• Da Fontoura, H. A., & Siegel, L. S. (1995). Reading, syntactic and memory skills of bilingual Portuguese-English Canadian children. Reading and Writing: An International Journal, 7, 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026951 Cited by20
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, & Siegel, Linda S. (2003). Reading skills in three orthographies: The case of trilingual Arabic-Hebrew-English-speaking Arab children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(7), 611–634.
    • Bodé, Sylvie, Serres, Joyce, & Ugen, Sonja. (2009). Similarities and differences of Luxembourgish and Romanophone 12 year olds' spelling strategies in German and in French. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.04bod
    • Breznitz, Zvia, Oren, Revital, & Shaul, Shelley. (2004). Brain activity of regular and dyslexic readers while reading Hebrew as compared to English sentences [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 707–737.
    • Figueredo, L. (2006). Using the known to chart the unknown: A review of first-language influence on the development of English-as-a-second-language spelling skill. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 873–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9014-1
    • Gottardo, Alexandra, Javier, Christine, Farnia, Fataneh, Mak, Lorinda, & Geva, Esther. (2014). Bidirectional cross-linguistic relations of first and second language skills in reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English learners [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 62–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.04got
    • Koda, Keiko. (2005). Learning to read across writing systems: Transfer, metalinguistic awareness, and second-language reading development. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (311–334). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Koda, Keiko. (2009). Learning to read in new writing systems. In Michael H. Long & Catherine J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching. Blackwell Publishing.
    • Koda, Keiko, & Miller, Ryan T. (2018). Cross-linguistic interactions in L2 word meaning inference in English as a foreign language. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 293–312). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Leikin, Mark, Schwartz, Mila, & Share, David L. (2010). General and specific benefits of bi-literate bilingualism: A Russian–Hebrew study of beginning literacy [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9210-x
    • Leikin, Mark, Share, David L., & Schwartz, Mila. (2005). Difficulties in L2 Hebrew reading in Russian-speaking second graders. Reading and Writing, 18(59, 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-8919-4
    • Lesaux, Nonie K., Lipka, Orly, & Siegel, Linda S. (2006). Investigating cognitive and linguistic abilities that influence the reading comprehension skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds [Special issue: Reading comprehension - Part II]. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4713-6
    • Lipka, Orly, & Siegel, Linda S. (2010). Early identification and intervention to prevent reading difficulties. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 205–219). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_15
    • Low, Pauline B., & Siegel, Linda S. (2005). A comparison of the cognitive processes underlying reading comprehension in native English and ESL speakers [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 207–231.
    • Mirza, Amna, & Gottardo, Alexandra. (2019). Learning to read in their heritage language: Hindi-English speaking children reading two different orthographies. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 329–351). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_17
    • Nakamoto, Jonathan, Lindsey, Kim A., & Manis, Franklin R. (2012). Development of reading skills from K-3 in Spanish-speaking English language learners following three programs of instruction. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9285-4
    • Nakamura, Pooja R., Koda, Keiko, & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2014). Biliteracy acquisition in Kannada and English: A developmental study [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855620
    • Reddy, Pooja P., & Koda, Keiko. (2013). Orthographic constraints on phonological awareness in biliteracy development. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.748639
    • Tibi, Sana, & McLeod, Lorraine. (2014). The development of young children's Arabic language and literacy in the United Arab Emirates. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 303–321). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling [Special issue: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends, edited by Esther Geva & Ludo Verhoeven]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0404_4
    • Wolff, Ulrika. (2010). Subgrouping of readers based on performance measures: A latent profile analysis. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9160-8
  • Dahl, K. L., & Freppon, P. A. (1995). A comparison of innercity children's interpretations of reading and writing instruction in the early grades in skills-based and whole language classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 50–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/747744 Cited by5
    • Connor, Carol McDonald. (2016a). Using cognitive development research to inform literacy instruction and improve practice in the classroom. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 166–185). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Connor, Carol McDonald, & Al Otaiba, Stephanie. (2015). Primary grade reading instruction in the United States. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 415–430). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Connor, Carol McDonald, & Morrison, Frederick J. (2017). Child characteristics by instruction interactions, literacy, and implications for theory and practice. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 507–524). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Hertz-Lazarowitz, Rachel. (2004). Storybook writing in first grade. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(3), 267–299.
    • Rasinski, Timothy. (2000). [Book review: Catherine E. Snow, M. Susan Burns, & Peg Griffin (Eds.), (1998), Preventing reading difficulties in young children]. Written Language & Literacy, 3(2), 281–285.
  • Dahlgren Sandberg, Annika. (1998). Reading and spelling among nonvocal children with cerebral palsy: Influence of home and school literacy environment. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 23–50.
  • Dahlgren Sandberg, Annika, & Hjelmquist, Erland. (1997). Language and literacy in nonvocal children with cerebral palsy. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 107–133. Cited by1
    • Dahlgren Sandberg, Annika. (1998). Reading and spelling among nonvocal children with cerebral palsy: Influence of home and school literacy environment. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 23–50.
  • Dahlin, Karin I. E. (2011). Effects of working memory training on reading in children with special needs [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9238-y
  • Dai, Jumana, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Share, David L. (2013). The influence of orthographic structure on printed word learning in Arabic. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.827563 Cited by2
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2017). Learning to read Arabic. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 127–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Yassin, Rana, Share, David L., & Shalhoub-Awwad, Yasmin. (2020). Learning to spell in Arabic: The impact of script-specific visual-orthographic features. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:2059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02059
  • Daigle, Daniel, & Armand, Françoise. (2008). Phonological sensitivity in severely and profoundly deaf readers of French. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9087-5
  • Dair, Carl. (1967). Design with type. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Cited by4
    • Bigelow, Charles. (1999). [Book review: Robert Bringhurst, (1996), The elements of typographic style (Second edition)]. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 156–161.
    • Brekle, Herbert E. (1994d). Typographie [Typography]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 204–227). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Haley, Allan, Poulin, Richard, Tselentis, Jason, Seddon, Tony, Leonidas, Gerry, Saltz, & Ina, Henderson, Kathryn, with Alterman, Tyler. (2012). Typography, referenced: A comprehensive visual guide to the language, history, and practice of typography. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
    • Rummonds, Richard-Gabriel. (1998). Printing on the iron handpress. New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press; London: The British Library.
  • Dalby, David. (1967). A survey of the indigenous scripts of Liberia and Sierra Leone: Vai, Mende, Loma, Kpelle and Bassa. African Language Studies, 8, 1–51. Cited by15
    • Berry, Jack. (1977). ‘The making of alphabets’ revisited. In Joshua A. Fishman, (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 3–16). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Buckley, Eugene. (2018). Core syllables vs. moraic writing [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00009.buc
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1992b). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 83–110). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Gregersen, Edgar A. (1977). Successes and failures in the modernization of Hausa spelling. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 421–440). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Kotei, S. I. A. (1977). The West African autochthonous alphabets: An exercise in comparative palaeography. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 55–73). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Monaghan, John. (2008). Revelatory scripts, ‘the unlettered genius’, and the appearance and disappearance of writing. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 323–334). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Scribner, Sylvia, & Cole, Michael. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
    • Singler, John Victor. (1996). Scripts of West Africa. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 593–598). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Smalley, William A. (1994b). Native creation of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 708–720). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Smalley, William, Chia Koua Vang, & Gnia Yee Yang. (1990). Mother of writing: The origin and development of a Hmong messianic script. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
    • Unseth, Peter. (2016a). The international impact of Sequoyah's Cherokee syllabary. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.03uns
    • Wyrod, Christopher. (2008). A social orthography of identity: the N'ko literacy movement in West Africa [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.033
  • Dalby, David. (1968). The indigenous scripts of West Africa and Surinam: Their inspiration and design. African Language Studies, 9, 156–197. Cited by16
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1992b). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 83–110). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Houston, Stephen, Baines, John, & Cooper, Jerrold. (2003). Last writing: Script obsolescence in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Mesoamerica. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45(3), 430–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417503000227
    • Kotei, S. I. A. (1977). The West African autochthonous alphabets: An exercise in comparative palaeography. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 55–73). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Monaghan, John. (2008). Revelatory scripts, ‘the unlettered genius’, and the appearance and disappearance of writing. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 323–334). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Mumin, Meikal. (2014). The Arabic script in Africa: Understudied literacy. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 41–76). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Scribner, Sylvia, & Cole, Michael. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
    • Singler, John Victor. (1996). Scripts of West Africa. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 593–598). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Smalley, William A. (1994b). Native creation of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 708–720). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Smalley, William, Chia Koua Vang, & Gnia Yee Yang. (1990). Mother of writing: The origin and development of a Hmong messianic script. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
    • Unseth, Peter. (2005). Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns
    • Unseth, Peter. (2016a). The international impact of Sequoyah's Cherokee syllabary. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.03uns
    • Wyrod, Christopher. (2008). A social orthography of identity: the N'ko literacy movement in West Africa [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.033
  • Dalby, David. (1969). Further indigenous scripts of West Africa: Manding, Wolof and Fula alphabets and Yoruba ‘holy’ writing. African Language Studies, 10, 161–181. Cited by12
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1992b). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 83–110). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Humery, Marie-Ève. (2014). Fula and the ajami writing system in the Haalpulaar society of Fuuta Tooro (Senegal and Mauritania): A specific ‘restricted literacy’. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 174–198). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Kotei, S. I. A. (1977). The West African autochthonous alphabets: An exercise in comparative palaeography. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 55–73). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Monaghan, John. (2008). Revelatory scripts, ‘the unlettered genius’, and the appearance and disappearance of writing. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 323–334). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Mumin, Meikal. (2014). The Arabic script in Africa: Understudied literacy. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 41–76). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Singler, John Victor. (1996). Scripts of West Africa. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 593–598). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Smalley, William A. (1994b). Native creation of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 708–720). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Street, Brian V., & Lefstein, Adam. (2007). Literacy: An advanced resource book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Unseth, Peter. (2016a). The international impact of Sequoyah's Cherokee syllabary. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.03uns
    • Wyrod, Christopher. (2008). A social orthography of identity: the N'ko literacy movement in West Africa [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.033
  • Dalby, David. (1970). The historical problem of the indigenous scripts of West Africa and Surinam. In David Dalby (Ed.), Language and history in Africa (pp. 109–119). New York: Africana. Cited by5
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Gregersen, Edgar A. (1977). Successes and failures in the modernization of Hausa spelling. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 421–440). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Scribner, Sylvia, & Cole, Michael. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
    • Singler, John Victor. (1996). Scripts of West Africa. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 593–598). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Smalley, William A. (1994b). Native creation of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 708–720). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27(2), 11–20; 37– 54. Cited by6
    • Bailin, Alan, & Grafstein, Ann. (2016). Readability: Text and context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Gibson, Eleanor J., & Levin, Harry. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Harrison, Colin. (1986). New directions in text research and readability. In Asher Cashdan (Ed.), Literacy: Teaching and learning language skills (pp. 61–81). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Kucer, Stephen B. (2010). Readers' tellings: Narrators, settings, flashbacks and comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(3), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01416.x
    • Shanahan, Timothy. (2005). Gaining perspective through science: A history of research synthesis in reading. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 193–210). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
  • Dale, Ian R. H. (1980). Digraphia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 26, 5–13. Cited by8
    • Ahmad, Rizwan. (2011). Urdu in Devanagari: Shifting orthographic practices and Muslim identity in Delhi. Language in Society, 40, 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404511000182
    • Angermeyer, Philipp Sebastian. (2012). Bilingualism meets digraphia: Script alternation and hybridity in Russian-American writing and beyond. In Mark Sebba, Shahrzad Mahootian, & Carla Jonsson (Eds.), Language mixing and code-switching in writing: Approaches to mixed-language written discourse (Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism 2) (pp. 255–272). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1994b). Schriftlichkeit und Diglossie [Writing and diglossia]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 739–745). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Elti di Rodeano, Sveva. (2019). Digraphia: The story of a sociolinguistic typology. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 111–126). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-elti
    • Tiun Hak-khiam. (1998). Writing in two scripts: A case study of digraphia in Taiwanese. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 225–248.
    • Unseth, Peter. (2005). Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns
    • Unseth, Peter. (2008). The sociolinguistics of script choice: An introduction [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.030
  • Dale, Philip S., Harlaar, Nicole, & Plomin, Robert. (2005). Telephone testing and teacher assessment of reading skills in 7-year-olds: I. Substantial correspondence for a sample of 5544 children and for extremes. Reading and Writing, 18(5), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-8130-z Cited by1
    • Harlaar, Nicole, Dale, Philip S., & Plomin, Robert. (2005). Telephone testing and teacher assessment of reading skills in 7-year-olds: II. Strong genetic overlap. Reading and Writing, 18(5), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-0271-1
  • d'Alfonso, Lorenzo, & Payne, Annick. (2016). The paleography of Anatolian hieroglyphic stone inscriptions. Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 68, 107–127. https://doi.org/10.5615/jcunestud.68.2016.0107 Cited by1
    • van den Hout, Theo. (2020). A history of Hittite literacy: Writing and reading in Late Bronze-Age Anatolia (1650–1200 BC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860161
  • Dalley, S. (Ed.). (1998). The legacy of Mesopotamia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by3
    • Brown, David. (2008). Increasingly redundant: The growing obsolescence of the cuneiform script in Babylonia from 539 BC. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 73–101). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Houston, Stephen, Baines, John, & Cooper, Jerrold. (2003). Last writing: Script obsolescence in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Mesoamerica. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45(3), 430–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417503000227
    • Pope, Maurice. (1975). The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphics to Linear B. London: Thames & Hudson: New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. [1999, Revised edition, The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphs to Maya script. London; New York: Thames & Hudson]
  • Daly, L. W. (1967). Contributions to a history of alphabetization in antiquity and the Middle Ages. Brüssel: Latomus. Cited by6
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Günther, Hartmut. (1996b). Schrift als Zahlen- und Ordnungssystem - alphabetisches Sortieren [Writing as a numbering and ordering system]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1568–1583). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Saarela, Mårten Söderblom. (2014). The Manchu script and information management: Some aspects of Qing China's great encounter with alphabetic literacy. In Benjamin A. Elman (Ed.), Rethinking East Asian languages, vernaculars, and literacies, 1000–1919 (Sinica Leidensia 115) (pp. 169–197). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004279278_008
  • Damasio, A. R., Castro-Caldas, A., Grosso, J. T., & Ferro, J. M. (1976). Brain specialization for language does not depend on literacy. Archives of Neurology, 33, 300–301. Cited by4
    • Castro-Caldas, Alexandre, & Reis, Alexandra. (2003). The knowledge of orthography is a revolution in the brain [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 81–97.
    • Jurdant, Baudouin. (1988). The role of vowels in alphabetic writing. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 381–400). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Lecours, André Roch, Mehler, Jacques, Parente, Maria-Alice, & Vadeboncoeur, Alain. (1988). Literacy and the brain. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 291–300). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Lecours, André Roch, & Nespoulous, Jean-Luc. (1988). The biology of writing. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 236–245). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Damerow, P. (1999). The origins of writing as a problem of historical epistemology (Preprint 114). Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Cited by5
    • Elti di Rodeano, Sveva. (2021). Scripts in contact: Transmission of the first alphabets. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 223–239). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-rode
    • Farmer, Steve, Sproat, Richard, & Witzel, Michael. (2004). The collapse of the Indus-script thesis: The myth of a literate Harappan civilization. Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 11(2), 19–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/ejvs.2004.2.620
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Salomon, Frank. (2013). The twisting paths of recall: Khipu (Andean cord notation) as artifact. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 15–43). London: Ubiquity Press. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.b
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
  • Damerow, P. (2006.). The origins of writing as a problem of historical epistemology. Cuneiform Digital Library Journal, 1, 1–10. http://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlj/2006/cdlj2006_001.html Cited by7
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2009). Evaluating merit–the evolution of writing reconsidered. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp001
    • Elti di Rodeano, Sveva. (2021). Scripts in contact: Transmission of the first alphabets. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 223–239). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-rode
    • Maiocchi, Massimo. (2019). Writing in early Mesopotamia: The historical interplay of technology, cognition, and environment. In Alan C. Love & William Wimsatt (Eds.). Beyond the meme: Development and structure in cultural evolution (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22) (pp. 395–424). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctvnp0krm.13
    • Melka, Tomi S. (2013). On a “kinetic”-like sequence in rongorongo tablet “Mamari”. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.742005
    • Piquette, Kathryn E. (2018a). An archaeology of art and writing: Early Egyptian labels in context. Cologne: Modern Academic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.16994/bak
    • Piquette, Kathryn E. (2018b). Signs and symbols. In Andrew Gardner, Mark Lake, & Ulrike Sommer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of archaeological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199567942.013.020
    • Woods, Christopher. (2010a). Introduction. Visible language: The earliest writing systems. in Christopher Woods (Ed.) with the assistance of Geoff Emberling & Emily Teeter, Visible language: Inventions of writing in the ancient Middle East and beyond (Oriental Institute Museum Publications 32) (pp. 15–25). Chicago, IL: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
  • Damerow, Peter, & Englund, Robert. (1987). Die Zahlzeichensysteme der Archaischen Texte aus Uruk. In Margaret W. Green & Hans Nissen (Eds.), Zeichenliste der Archaischen Texte aus Uruk (pp. 117–66). Berlin: Mann. Cited by7
    • Englund, Robert K. (1996). The Proto-Elamite script. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 160–164). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Justus, Carol F. (2002). [Book review: Jean Bottéro, Clarisse Herrenschmidt, & Jean-Pierre Vernant, (2000), Ancestor of the West: Writing, reasoning, and religion in Mesopotamia, Elam, and Greece]. Visible Language, 36(1), 62–74.
    • Middeke-Conlin, Robert. (2020). The making of a scribe: Errors, mistakes and rounding numbers in the Old Babylonian kingdom of Larsa (Why the Sciences of the Ancient World Matter 4). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35951-5
    • Nissen, Hans. (1986). The archaic texts from Uruk. World Archaeology, 17(3), 317–334.
    • Pettersson, John Sören. (1996b). Numerical notation. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 795–806). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. (1992). Before writing [Two volumes: Volume 1. From counting to cuneiform; Volume 2. A catalog of near eastern tokens]. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Damerow, Peter, & Englund, Robert. (1989). The Proto-Elamite texts from Tepe Yahya (American School of Prehistoric Research Bulletin 39). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cited by7
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Englund, Robert K. (1996). The Proto-Elamite script. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 160–164). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Farmer, Steve, Sproat, Richard, & Witzel, Michael. (2004). The collapse of the Indus-script thesis: The myth of a literate Harappan civilization. Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 11(2), 19–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/ejvs.2004.2.620
    • Finkel, Irving. (2010). Strange byways in cuneiform writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 9–25). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Justus, Carol F. (2002). [Book review: Jean Bottéro, Clarisse Herrenschmidt, & Jean-Pierre Vernant, (2000), Ancestor of the West: Writing, reasoning, and religion in Mesopotamia, Elam, and Greece]. Visible Language, 36(1), 62–74.
    • Krebernik, Manfred, & Nissen, Hans J. (1994). Die sumerisch-akkadische Keilschrift [Sumerian-Accadic cuneiform scripts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 274–288). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Dane, Joseph A. (2012). Out of sorts: On typography and modern theories of print culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022‑5371(80)90312‑6 Cited by37
    • Alptekin, Cem, & Erçetin, Gülcan. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01412.x
    • Andreassen, Rune, & Bråten, Ivar. (2010). Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different multiple-choice tests. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(3), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01413.x
    • Babayiğit, Selma, & Stainthorp, Rhona. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y
    • Beers, Scott F., Quinlan, Thomas, & Harbaugh, Allen G. (2010). Adolescent students' reading during writing behaviors and relationships with text quality: An eyetracking study [Special issue: Reading during writing. What does eyetracking research tell us about the interaction between reading and writing processes during text production?, edited by Luuk Van Waes, Mariëlle, Leijten, & Åsa Wengelin]. Reading and Writing, 23(7), 743–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9193-7
    • Bourke, Lorna, & Adams, Anne-Marie. (2010). Cognitive constraints and the early learning goals in writing [Special Issue:Writing development: Cognitive, sociocultural, linguistic perspectives, edited b Debra Myhill & Ros Fisher]. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01434.x
    • Cui, Yao, & Chen, Yong-ming. (1997). Predictive inference in reading. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 287–297). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Geva, Esther. (1995). Orthographic and cognitive processing in learning to read English and Hebrew. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 277–291). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Geva, Esther, & Siegel, Linda S. (2000). Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in two languages. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008017710115
    • Goff, Deborah A., Pratt, Chris, & Ong, Ben. (2005). The relations between children's reading comprehension, working memory, language skills and components of reading decoding in a normal sample. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 583–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-7109-0
    • Grabowski, Joachim, Weinzierl, Christian, & Schmitt, Markus. (2010). Second and fourth graders’ copying ability: From graphical to linguistic processing [Special Issue:Writing development: Cognitive, sociocultural, linguistic perspectives, edited b Debra Myhill & Ros Fisher]. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01431.x
    • Hacker, Douglas J. (1997). Comprehension monitoring of written discourse across early-to-middle adolescence. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(3), 207–240.
    • Hagtvet, Bente E. (2003). Listening comprehension and reading comprehension in poor decoders: Evidence for the importance of syntactic and semantic skills as well as phonological skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(6), 505–539.
    • Hoskyn, Maureen, & Swanson, H. Lee. (2003). The relationship between working memory and writing in younger and older adults. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(8), 759–784.
    • Just, Marcel Adam, & Carpenter, Patricia A. (1995). The intensity dimension of thought: Pupillometric indices of sentence processing. In John M. Henderson, Murray Singer, & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 182–211). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Koda, Keiko. (1995). Cognitive consequences of L1 and L2 orthographies. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 311–326). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Leinonen, Seija, Müller, Kurt, Leppänen, Paavo H. T., Aro, Mikko, Ahonen, Timo, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2001). Heterogeneity in adult dyslexic readers: Relating processing skills to the speed and accuracy of oral text reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 265–296.
    • Lesaux, Nonie K., Lipka, Orly, & Siegel, Linda S. (2006). Investigating cognitive and linguistic abilities that influence the reading comprehension skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds [Special issue: Reading comprehension - Part II]. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4713-6
    • Lipka, Orly, & Siegel, Linda S. (2010). Early identification and intervention to prevent reading difficulties. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 205–219). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_15
    • Margolin, Sara J., & Brackins, Timothy. (2020). Comprehension and metacomprehension of negated text: Is retrieval practice beneficial for understanding? Written Language & Literacy, 23(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00034.mar
    • Meyler, Ann, & Breznitz, Zvia. (1998). Developmental associations between verbal and visual short-term memory and the acquisition of decoding skill. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(6), 519–540.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Russell, Devin, & Connor, Carol McDonald. (2016). Memory and learning to read. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 53–66). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Seidenberg, Mark S., & McClelland, James L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
    • Seigneuric, Alix, & Ehrlich, Marie-France. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children's reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 617–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0
    • Seigneuric, Alix, Ehrlich, Marie-France, Oakhill, Jane V., & Yuill, Nicola M. (2000). Working memory resources and children's reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008088230941
    • Shimron, Joseph. (1999). The role of vowel signs in Hebrew: Beyond word recognition [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008045316692
    • Smith, Philip T. (1996). Research methods in the psychology of reading. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 932–942). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sparks, Richard L. (2004). Orthographic awareness, phonemic awareness, syntactic processing, and working memory skill in hyperlexic children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(4), 359–386.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Staub, Adrian. (2015). Reading sentences: Syntactic parsing and semantic interpretation. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 202–216). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Stringer, Ronald W., Toplak, Maggie E., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2004). Differential relationships between RAN performance, behaviour ratings, and executive function measures: Searching for a double dissociation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 891–914.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • van den Broek, Paul, & Kendeou, Panayiota. (2017). Development of reading comprehension: Change and continuity in the ability to construct coherent representations. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 283–305). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Vanderberg, Robert, & Swanson, H. Lee. (2007). Which components of working memory are important in the writing process? Reading and Writing, 20(7), 721–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9046-6
    • Wagner, Richard K., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192
    • Zaretsky, Elena, Kraljevic, Jelena Kuvac, Core, Cynthia, & Lencek, Mirjana. (2009). Literacy predictors and early reading and spelling skills as a factor of orthography: Cross-linguistic evidence. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 52–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.03zar
  • Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 561–584. Cited by6
    • Alptekin, Cem, & Erçetin, Gülcan. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01412.x
    • Daneman, Meredyth, & Reingold, Eyal. (1993). What eye fixations tell us about phonological recoding during reading. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 153–178. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 25–50). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Oakhill, Jane V., Berenhaus, Molly S., & Cain, Kate. (2015). Children's reading comprehension and comprehension difficulties. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 344–360). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Seigneuric, Alix, Ehrlich, Marie-France, Oakhill, Jane V., & Yuill, Nicola M. (2000). Working memory resources and children's reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008088230941
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1–18. Cited by6
    • Alamargot, Denis, Lambert, Eric, Thebault, Claire, & Dansac, Christophe. (2007). Text composition by deaf and hearing middle-school students: The role of working memory. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9033-y
    • Alptekin, Cem, & Erçetin, Gülcan. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01412.x
    • Bourke, Lorna, & Adams, Anne-Marie. (2010). Cognitive constraints and the early learning goals in writing [Special Issue:Writing development: Cognitive, sociocultural, linguistic perspectives, edited b Debra Myhill & Ros Fisher]. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01434.x
    • Hacker, Douglas J. (1997). Comprehension monitoring of written discourse across early-to-middle adolescence. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(3), 207–240.
    • Russell, Devin, & Connor, Carol McDonald. (2016). Memory and learning to read. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 53–66). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996).Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214546 Cited by7
    • Alptekin, Cem, & Erçetin, Gülcan. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01412.x
    • Cain, Kate, & Barnes, Marcia A. (2017). Reading comprehension: What develops and when? In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 257–281). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Goff, Deborah A., Pratt, Chris, & Ong, Ben. (2005). The relations between children's reading comprehension, working memory, language skills and components of reading decoding in a normal sample. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 583–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-7109-0
    • Margolin, Sara J., & Brackins, Timothy. (2020). Comprehension and metacomprehension of negated text: Is retrieval practice beneficial for understanding? Written Language & Literacy, 23(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00034.mar
    • Oakhill, Jane V., Berenhaus, Molly S., & Cain, Kate. (2015). Children's reading comprehension and comprehension difficulties. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 344–360). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Russell, Devin, & Connor, Carol McDonald. (2016). Memory and learning to read. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 53–66). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Seigneuric, Alix, Ehrlich, Marie-France, Oakhill, Jane V., & Yuill, Nicola M. (2000). Working memory resources and children's reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008088230941
  • Daneman, Meredyth, & Reingold, Eyal. (1993). What eye fixations tell us about phonological recoding during reading. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 153–178. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 25–50). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates] Cited by7
    • Binder, Katherine, & Borecki, Caren. (2008). The use of phonological, orthographic, and contextual information during reading: A comparison of adults who are learning to read and skilled adult readers. Reading and Writing, 21(8), 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9099-1
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Matsunaga, Sachiko. (2002b). Early phonological activation in reading kanji: An eye-tracking study. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 157–171). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Penke, Martina, & Schrader, Kathrin. (2008). The role of phonology in visual word recognition: Reading acquisition vs. skilled reading [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.04pen
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2012). Eye movements and word recognition during reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 73–101). London: Psychology Press.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Daneman, M., Reingold, E. M., & Davidson, M. (1995). Time course of phonological activation during reading: Evidence from eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 884–898. Cited by5
    • Binder, Katherine, & Borecki, Caren. (2008). The use of phonological, orthographic, and contextual information during reading: A comparison of adults who are learning to read and skilled adult readers. Reading and Writing, 21(8), 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9099-1
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Matsunaga, Sachiko. (2002b). Early phonological activation in reading kanji: An eye-tracking study. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 157–171). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Ren, Gui-Qin, & Yang, Yufang. (2010). Syntactic boundaries and comma placement during silent reading of Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01406.x
  • Daneman, M., & Tardif, T. (1987). Working memory and reading skill reexamined. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance: Volume 12 (pp. 491–508). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cited by3
    • Seigneuric, Alix, Ehrlich, Marie-France, Oakhill, Jane V., & Yuill, Nicola M. (2000). Working memory resources and children's reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008088230941
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Danesi, Marcel. (2017). The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet (Bloomsbury Advances in Semiotics). London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Cited by3
    • Alshenqeeti, Hamza. (2016). Are emojis creating a new or old visual language for new generations? A socio-semiotic study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(6). 56-69. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.6p.5
    • Dürscheid, Christa, & Meletis, Dimitrios. (2019). Emojis: A grapholinguistic approach. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 167–183). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-duer
    • Verheijen, Lieke. (2018). Orthographic principles in computer-mediated communication: The SUPER-functions of textisms and their interaction with age and medium [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 111–145. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00012.ver
  • Danet, B. (2001). Cyberpl@y: Communicating online. Oxford: Berg Publishers. Cited by9
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2004). Rethinking written culture [A discussion of R. Harris, (2000), Rethinking writing]. Language Sciences, 26, 57–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2003.06.001
    • Gottlieb, Nanette. (2008). Japan: Language planning and policy in transition. In Robert B. Kaplan & Richard B. Baldauf Jr. (Eds.), Language planning and policy in Asia, Volume 1: Japan, Nepal, Taiwan and Chinese characters (Language Planning and Policy) (pp. 102–169). Bristol; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Grace, Abbie, Kemp, Nenagh, Martin, Frances Heritage, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Undergraduates' use of text messaging language: Effects of country and collection method [Special issue: The writing system at play, edited by Vivian Cook, Benedetta Bassetti, & Jyotsna Vaid]. Writing Systems Research, 4, 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.712875
    • Hachimi, Atiqa. (2017). Moralizing stances: Discursive play and ideologies of language and gender in Moroccan digital discourse. In Jacob Høigilt & Gunvor Mejdell (Eds.), The politics of written language in the Arab world: Writing change (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 90) (pp. 239–265). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Houston, Keith. (2013). Shady characters: The secret life of punctuation, symbols and other typographical marks. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
    • Kytölä, Samu. (2012). Multilingual web discussion forums: Theoretical, practical and methodological issues. In Mark Sebba, Shahrzad Mahootian, & Carla Jonsson (Eds.), Language mixing and code-switching in writing: Approaches to mixed-language written discourse (Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism 2) (pp. 106–127). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Squires, Lauren. (2016). Computer-mediated communication and the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 471–486). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Tagg, Caroline, & Seargeant, Philip. (2012). Writing systems at play in Thai-English online interactions [Special issue: The writing system at play, edited by Vivian Cook, Benedetta Bassetti, & Jyotsna Vaid]. Writing Systems Research, 4, 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2011.628583
    • Zelenkauskaite, Asta. (2017). Abbreviate and insert? Message length, addressee and non-standard writing in Italian mobile texting and Facebook. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1389797
  • Danet, B., & Herring, S. C. (Eds.). (2007). The multilingual Internet: Language, culture and communication online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by10
    • Abu Elhija, Dua'a. (2014). A new writing system? Developing orthographies for writing Arabic dialects in electronic media. Writing Systems Research, 6(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.868334
    • Angermeyer, Philipp Sebastian. (2012). Bilingualism meets digraphia: Script alternation and hybridity in Russian-American writing and beyond. In Mark Sebba, Shahrzad Mahootian, & Carla Jonsson (Eds.), Language mixing and code-switching in writing: Approaches to mixed-language written discourse (Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism 2) (pp. 255–272). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Danesi, Marcel. (2017). The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet (Bloomsbury Advances in Semiotics). London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    • Hachimi, Atiqa. (2017). Moralizing stances: Discursive play and ideologies of language and gender in Moroccan digital discourse. In Jacob Høigilt & Gunvor Mejdell (Eds.), The politics of written language in the Arab world: Writing change (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 90) (pp. 239–265). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Jones, Mari C., & Mooney, Damien (Eds.). (2017). Creating orthographies for endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316562949
    • Kytölä, Samu. (2012). Multilingual web discussion forums: Theoretical, practical and methodological issues. In Mark Sebba, Shahrzad Mahootian, & Carla Jonsson (Eds.), Language mixing and code-switching in writing: Approaches to mixed-language written discourse (Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism 2) (pp. 106–127). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Lee, Carmen, & Barton, David. (2012). Multilingual texts on Web 2.0: The case of Flickr.com. In Mark Sebba, Shahrzad Mahootian, & Carla Jonsson (Eds.), Language mixing and code-switching in writing: Approaches to mixed-language written discourse (Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism 2) (pp. 128–145). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Themistocleous, Christiana. (2010). Writing in a non-standard Greek variety: Romanized Cypriot Greek in online chat. Writing Systems Research, 2(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq008
    • Wood, Clare, Kemp, Nenagh, & Plester, Beverley. (2013). Text messaging and literacy - The evidence (Routledge Psychology in Education). London; New York: Routledge.
  • Danet, Claire, Boutet, Dominique, Doan, Patrick, Bianchini, Claudia Savina, Contesse, Adrien, Chèvrefils, Léa, Rébulard, Morgane, Thomas, Chloé, & Dauphin, Jean-François. (2021). Transcribing sign languages with TYPANNOT: The typographic system that retains and displays layers of information. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 1009–1037). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-dane
  • Dani, Ahmad Hasan. (1963). Indian palaeography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [1986, Second edition, Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal] Cited by14
    • Bhatia, Tej K. (2003). The Gurmukhi script and other writing systems of Punjab: History, structure and identity. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 181–213). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Bright, William. (1994). Evolution of the Indian writing system. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 322–328). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2000). On writing syllabaries: Three episodes of transfer [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 73–86.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Padakannaya, Prakash, Pandey, Aparna, Saligram, Deepthi, & Rao, Shruthi Ranga. (2016). Visual-orthographic complexity of Akshara and eye movements in reading: A study in Kannada alphasyllabary. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1071235
    • Prakash, P., & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (1995). Orthography and reading in Kannada: A Dravidian language. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 95–108). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Salomon, Richard G. (1996). Brahmi and Kharoshthi. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 373–383). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sander, Lore. (2003). Brāhmī scripts in North India from the beginning in the 3rd cent. B.C. to the 7th cent. A.D. under the aspect of digitisation. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 92–102). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Sen, Subhadra Kumer. (1996). The Devanagari writing system. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1428–1432). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Srivastava, Anupama. (1998). The development of imperial Gupta Brāhmī script (The Heritage of Ancient India 35). New Delhi: Ramanand Vidya Bhawan.
    • Strauch, Ingo. (2012). The character of the Indian Kharoṣṭhī script and the “Sanskrit Revolution”: A writing system between identity and assimilation. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 131–168). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Dani, Ahmad Hasan. (1986). Indian palaeography (Second edition). Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal. [1963, First edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press] Cited by10
    • Bright, William. (1996b). Kannada and Telugu writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 413–419). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2000). On writing syllabaries: Three episodes of transfer [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 73–86.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2017a). The writing systems of Indo-European. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph, & Matthias Fritz (Eds.) in cooperation with Mark Wenthe, Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 41.1) (pp. 26–61). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261288-00
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • Daswani, Chander J. (1994). The sphere of Indian writing. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 451-472). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Patel, Purushottam G. (1995). Brahmi scripts, Orthographic units and reading acquisition. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 265–275). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Ramanarasimham, Parimi. (2003). Telugu script: Historical and synchronic profiles. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 350–368). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Salomon, Richard G. (1996). Brahmi and Kharoshthi. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 373–383). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Daniel, J. F. (1941). Prolegomena to the Cypro-Minoan script. American Journal of Archaeology, 45(2), 249–282. Cited by7
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2013). A linguistic history of Ancient Cyprus: The non-Greek languages, and their relations with Greek, c.1600–300 BC (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2017c). Writing «systems»: Literacy and the transmission of writing in nonadministrative contexts. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 153–172). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2019). Writing and society in ancient Cyprus (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316729977
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2020a). Material entanglements of writing practices in the Bronze Age Aegean and Cyprus. Sustainability, 12, 10671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410671
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2013). Syllabic writing on Cyprus and its context (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Valério, Miguel, & Davis, Brent. (2017). Cypro-Minoan in marking systems of the Eastern and Central Mediterranean: New methods of investigating old questions. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 132–152). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1990). Fundamentals of grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 110, 727–731. https://doi.org/10.2307/602899 Cited by42
    • Ahlberg, Aija Katriina. (2020). How abugida readers learn alphabetic literacy skills: The role of phonological awareness in the transfer process in the Konso language, Southwest Ethiopia (JYU Dissertations 237). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-8188-4
    • Ahlberg, Aija Katriina, Eklund, Kenneth, Otieno, Suzanne C. S. A., & Nieminen, Lea. (2019). From abugida to alphabet in Konso, Ethiopia: The interplay between script and phonological awareness. Written Language & Literacy, 22(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00018.ahl
    • Asaad, Hanan, & Eviatar, Zohar. (2013). The effects of orthographic complexity and diglossia on letter naming in Arabic: A developmental study. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.862163
    • Ashworth, Evan. (2013). Language and ideologies and orthographies: Developing a writing system for Than Ówîngeh. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New Mexico.
    • Bondarev, Dmitry. (2019). Introduction: Orthographic polyphony in Arabic script. In Dmitry Bondarev, Alessandro Gori, & Lameen Souag (Eds.), Creating standards: Interactions with Arabic script in 12 manuscript cultures (Studies in Manuscript Cultures 16) (pp. 1–37). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110639063-001
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Buckley, Eugene. (2018). Core syllables vs. moraic writing [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00009.buc
    • Chang, Li-Yun, Chen, Yen-Chi, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2018). GraphCom: A multidimensional measure of graphic complexity applied to 131 written languages. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0881-y
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Crellin, Robert. (2019). Writing vowels in Punic: From morphography to phonography [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00026.cre
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Dai, Jumana, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Share, David L. (2013). The influence of orthographic structure on printed word learning in Arabic. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.827563
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1992b). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 83–110). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2000). On writing syllabaries: Three episodes of transfer [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 73–86.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2006). On beyond alphabets [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.03dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009b). Two notes on terminology. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.09dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2021). Hebrew script for Jewish languages: A unique phenomenon. Written Language & Literacy, 24(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00050.dan
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2012). Maldivian Thaana, Japanese kana, and the representation of moras in writing [Special issue: Second language writing systems, edited by Benedetta Bassetti, Jyotsna Vaid, & Vivian Cook]. Writing Systems Research, 4(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.693459
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Houston, Stephen, Baines, John, & Cooper, Jerrold. (2003). Last writing: Script obsolescence in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Mesoamerica. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45(3), 430–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417503000227
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Joyce, Terry. (2016). Writing systems and scripts. In Andrea Rocci & Louis de Saussure (Eds.), Verbal communication (Handbooks of Communication Science 3) (pp. 287–308). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255478-016
    • Joyce, Terry, & Borgwaldt, Susanne R. (2011). Typology of writing systems: Special issue introduction [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.01joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Joyce, Terry, & Crellin, Robert. (2019). Introduction. Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?) [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00024.joy
    • Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. (2000). Sejong's theory of literacy and writing [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin w. Kim, Elmer H., Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 13–45.
    • Lehmann, Reinhard G. (2012). 27–30–22–26 – How many letters needs an alphabet? The case of Semitic. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 11–52). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2018). What is natural in writing? Prolegomena to a Natural Grapholinguistics [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00010.mel
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Moran, Steven, & Cysouw, Michael. (2018). The Unicode cookbook for linguists: Managing writing systems using orthography profiles (Translation and Multilingual Natural Language Processing 10). Berlin: Language Science Press.
    • Nag, Sonali. (2017b). Learning to read alphasyllabaries. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 75–97). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • O'Connor, M. (1996a). Epigraphic Semitic scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 88–107). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Share, David L. (2017). Learning to read Hebrew. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 155–180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Share, David L. & Daniels, Peter T. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
    • Share, David L., Shany, Michal, & Lipka, Orly. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Hebrew. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 152–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.008
    • Tonietti, Maria Vittoria. (2015). The Assyrian model: Les syllabaires d'Ebla (2350 av. J.-C.) et les abjads du IIe millénaire av. J.-C. In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 49–72). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1991a). Ha, La, Ḥa or Hōi, Lawe, Ḥaut: The Ethiopic letter names. In Alan S. Kaye (Eds.), Semitic studies in honor of Wolf Leslau on the occasion of his eighty-fifth birthday (pp. 275–288). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Cited by5
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1992b). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 83–110). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996c). The first civilization. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 21–32). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Haile, Getatchew. (1996). Ethiopic writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 569–576). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • O'Connor, M. (1996c). The alphabet as a technology. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 787–794). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1991b). Is a structural graphemics possible? LACUS Forum, 18, 528–537. Cited by14
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Hockett, Charles F. (2003). Two lectures on writing [prepared for publication by Peter T. Daniels]. Written Language & Literacy, 6(2), 131–175.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2009). Homographic kanji, their ambiguity and the effectiveness of okurigana as a device for disambiguation [Special issue: Writing systems and linguistic structure, edited by Sang-Oak Lee]. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.06hon
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2011). The relation of orthographic units to linguistic units in the Japanese writing system: An analysis of kanji, kana and kanji-okurigana writing. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Tsukuba, Japan.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2021). On being a grapholinguist. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 125–141). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-mele
    • Neef, Martin. (2012b). Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems. Writing Systems Research, 4(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.706658
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Ryan, Des. (2015). Google doodles: Evidence of how graphemes' colour, shape, size and position can interact to make writing multidimensional. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.912578
    • Share, David L. & Daniels, Peter T. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
    • Sproat, Richard. (1998). [Book review: Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), (1996), The world's writing systems]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(1), 129–137.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Tranter, Nicolas. (2013). Logography and layering: A functional cross-linguistic analysis. Written Language & Literacy, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.1.01tra
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1992a). Contacts between Semitic and Indic scripts. In Amir Harrak (Ed.), Contacts between cultures: Selected papers from the 33rd International Congress of Asian and North African Studies, Toronto, 15-25 August 1990, West Asia and North Africa (pp. 146–152). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen. Cited by7
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996c). The first civilization. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 21–32). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2000). On writing syllabaries: Three episodes of transfer [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 73–86.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • Share, David L. & Daniels, Peter T. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
    • Unseth, Peter. (2005). Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1992b). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 83–110). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Cited by39
    • Baroni, Antonio. (2011). Alphabetic vs. non-alphabetic writing: Linguistic fit and natural tendencies. Rivista di Linguistica [Italian Journal of Linguistics], 23(2), 127–159.
    • Behr, Wolfgang. (2010). In the interstices of representation: Ludic writing and the locus of polysemy in the Chinese sign. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 281–314). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Buckley, Eugene. (2018). Core syllables vs. moraic writing [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00009.buc
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996g). The invention of writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 579–586). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996i). Shorthand. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 807–820). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1998). [Book review: D. Gary Miller, (1994), Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(1), 141–147.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2000). On writing syllabaries: Three episodes of transfer [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 73–86.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2001). Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 43–80). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. [2017, Second edition, (pp. 75–94)]
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2006). On beyond alphabets [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.03dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009b). Two notes on terminology. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.09dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2017a). The writing systems of Indo-European. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph, & Matthias Fritz (Eds.) in cooperation with Mark Wenthe, Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 41.1) (pp. 26–61). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261288-00
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2019). What do kanji graphs represent in the current Japanese writing system? Towards a unified model of kanji as written signs. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 185–208). Brest: Fluxus Editions. http://www.fluxus-editions.fr/gla1-hond.pdf
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • King, Ross. (1996). Korean writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 218–227). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Maiocchi, Massimo. (2019). Writing in early Mesopotamia: The historical interplay of technology, cognition, and environment. In Alan C. Love & William Wimsatt (Eds.). Beyond the meme: Development and structure in cultural evolution (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22) (pp. 395–424). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctvnp0krm.13
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • O'Connor, M. (1996c). The alphabet as a technology. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 787–794). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Ratcliffe, Robert R. (2001). What do “phonemic” writing systems represent?: Arabic huruuf, Japanese kana, and the moraic principle. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 1–14.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2013). A tale of one letter: Morphological processing in early Arabic spelling. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.857586
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2017). Learning to read Arabic. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 127–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, & Henkin-Roitfarbm Roni. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Share, David L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(752). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
    • Share, David L. (2020). Extricating reading science from entrenched anglocentricism, eurocentricism, and alphabetism and embracing global diversity: A personal journey. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 4(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.28987/ijrld.4.2.3
    • Share, David L. & Daniels, Peter T. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
    • Song, Hye Jeong, & Wiese, Richard. (2010). Resistance to complexity interacting with visual shape—German and Korean orthography. Writing Systems Research, 2(2) 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq010
    • Sproat, Richard. (2017). A computational model of the discovery of writing. Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 194-226. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00004.spr
    • Sproat, Richard. (2018). [Book review: Peter T. Daniels, (2018), An exploration of writing]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(2), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00017.spr
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Traulsen, Thorsten. (2012). Han'gğl reform movement in the twentieth century: Roman pressure on Korean writing. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 103–130). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Vernon, Sofía A. (2016). Syllabic processes in the initial stages of writing development. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 93–108). Cham: Springer.
    • Woods, Christopher. (2010a). Introduction. Visible language: The earliest writing systems. in Christopher Woods (Ed.) with the assistance of Geoff Emberling & Emily Teeter, Visible language: Inventions of writing in the ancient Middle East and beyond (Oriental Institute Museum Publications 32) (pp. 15–25). Chicago, IL: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
    • Yassin, Rana, Share, David L., & Shalhoub-Awwad, Yasmin. (2020). Learning to spell in Arabic: The impact of script-specific visual-orthographic features. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:2059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02059
  • Daniels, P. T. (1994a). Edward Hincks's decipherment of Mesopotamian cuneiform. In K. J. Cathcart (Ed.) ,The Edward Hincks Bicentenary Lectures (pp. 30–57). Dublin: Department of Near Eastern Languages, University College. Cited by6
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996d). Methods of decipherment. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 141–159). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2001). Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 43–80). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. [2017, Second edition, (pp. 75–94)]
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2017a). The writing systems of Indo-European. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph, & Matthias Fritz (Eds.) in cooperation with Mark Wenthe, Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 41.1) (pp. 26–61). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261288-00
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2020). The decipherment of ancient Near Eastern languages. In Rebecca Hasselbach-Andee (Ed.), A companion to ancient Near Eastern languages (pp. 3–25). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1994b). Reply to Herrick. LACUS Forum, 21, 425–431. Cited by8
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2009). Homographic kanji, their ambiguity and the effectiveness of okurigana as a device for disambiguation [Special issue: Writing systems and linguistic structure, edited by Sang-Oak Lee]. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.06hon
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2011). The relation of orthographic units to linguistic units in the Japanese writing system: An analysis of kanji, kana and kanji-okurigana writing. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Tsukuba, Japan.
    • Neef, Martin. (2012b). Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems. Writing Systems Research, 4(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.706658
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Ryan, Des. (2011). Grammaphonology: A new theory of English spelling. Skase Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 8(2), 2–30.
    • Ryan, Des. (2015). Google doodles: Evidence of how graphemes' colour, shape, size and position can interact to make writing multidimensional. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.912578
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1996a). Grammatology. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 1–2). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by13
    • Berman, Ruth A. (2016). Linguistic literacy and later language development. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 181–200). Cham: Springer.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Habib, Sandy, & Kurzon, Dennis. (2008). The systematization and typology of the instant messaging writing system used by young Israeli Arabs. Written Language & Literacy, 11(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.1.04hab
    • Küster, Marc Wilhelm. (2019). Open and closed writing systems. Some reflections. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 17–26). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-kues
    • Nag, Sonali. (2017b). Learning to read Kannada and other languages of South Asia. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 104-126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Primus, Beatrice. (2004). A featural analysis of the Modern Roman Alphabet [Special issue: From letter to sound, edited by Martin Neef & Beatrice Primus]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(2), 235–274. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.2.06pri
    • Primus, Beatrice, & Neef, Martin. (2004). Introduction: From letter to sound: New perspectives on writing systems [Special issue: From letter to sound, edited by Martin Neef & Beatrice Primus]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(2), 133–138.
    • Quack, Joachim Friedrich. (2010b). Difficult hieroglyphs and unreadable demotic? How the ancient Egyptians dealt with the complexities of their script. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 235–251). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Ryan, Des. (2015). Google doodles: Evidence of how graphemes' colour, shape, size and position can interact to make writing multidimensional. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.912578
    • Swank, Heidi. (2008). It all hinges on the vowels: Reconsidering the alphasyllabary classification. Written Language & Literacy, 11(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.1.06swa
    • Swank, Heidi. (2009). A response to Peter T. Daniels. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.10swa
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by52
    • Ahlberg, Aija Katriina. (2020). How abugida readers learn alphabetic literacy skills: The role of phonological awareness in the transfer process in the Konso language, Southwest Ethiopia (JYU Dissertations 237). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-8188-4
    • Ahlberg, Aija Katriina, Eklund, Kenneth, Otieno, Suzanne C. S. A., & Nieminen, Lea. (2019). From abugida to alphabet in Konso, Ethiopia: The interplay between script and phonological awareness. Written Language & Literacy, 22(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00018.ahl
    • Bhide, Adeetee, & Perfetti, Charles. (2019). Challenges in learning akshara orthographies for second language learners. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 311–326). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_16
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Bright, William. (1999). A matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.03bri
    • Bright, William. (2000). A matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 63–71.
    • Bright, William. (2005). [Book review: Henry Rogers, (2005), Writing systems: A linguistic approach]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 72–76.
    • Chrisomalis, Stephen. (2009). The origins and co-evolution of literacy and numeracy. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 59–74). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    • Cook, Vivian. (2016). Background to the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 5–23). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Diller, Anthony. (2017). Early Thai orthography: Innovative tone-marking or recent hoax? Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00005.dil
    • Elvira Astoreca, Natalia. (2021a). Early Greek alphabetic writing: A linguistic approach (Contexts of and Relations Between Early Writing Systems 5). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Fedorova, Liudmila L. (2012). The development of structural characteristics of Brahmi script in derivative writing systems. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1). 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.01fed
    • Fedorova, Liudmila L. (2021). On the typology of writing systems. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 805–824). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-fedo
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Handel, Zev. (2015). Logography and the classification of writing systems: A response to Unger. Scripta, 7, 109–150.
    • Handel, Zev. (2019). Sinography: The borrowing and adaptation of the Chinese script (Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis 1). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352223
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2011). The relation of orthographic units to linguistic units in the Japanese writing system: An analysis of kanji, kana and kanji-okurigana writing. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Tsukuba, Japan.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2019). What do kanji graphs represent in the current Japanese writing system? Towards a unified model of kanji as written signs. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 185–208). Brest: Fluxus Editions. http://www.fluxus-editions.fr/gla1-hond.pdf
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2021). A modular theoretic approach to the Japanese writing system: Possibilities and challenges. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 621–643). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-hond
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2004). Modeling the Japanese mental lexicon: Morphological, orthographic and phonological considerations. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in Psychological Research: Volume 31 (pp. 27–61). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Joyce, Terry. (2016). Writing systems and scripts. In Andrea Rocci & Louis de Saussure (Eds.), Verbal communication (Handbooks of Communication Science 3) (pp. 287–308). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255478-016
    • Joyce, Terry, & Borgwaldt, Susanne R. (2011). Typology of writing systems: Special issue introduction [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.01joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Joyce, Terry, & Ohta, Nobuo. (2002). Constituent morpheme frequency data for two-kanji compound words. Tsukuba Psychological Research, 24, 111–141.
    • Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. (2000). Sejong's theory of literacy and writing [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin w. Kim, Elmer H., Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 13–45.
    • Küster, Marc Wilhelm. (2016). Writing beyond the letter. Tijdschrift Voor Mediageschiendenis, 19(2). doi10.18146/2213-7653.2016.262
    • Lehmann, Reinhard G. (2012). 27–30–22–26 – How many letters needs an alphabet? The case of Semitic. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 11–52). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Lew, Sigrid. (2014). A linguistic analysis of the Lao writing system and its suitability for minority language orthographies [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.846843
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • Maiocchi, Massimo. (2019). Writing in early Mesopotamia: The historical interplay of technology, cognition, and environment. In Alan C. Love & William Wimsatt (Eds.). Beyond the meme: Development and structure in cultural evolution (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22) (pp. 395–424). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctvnp0krm.13
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Moran, Steven, & Cysouw, Michael. (2018). The Unicode cookbook for linguists: Managing writing systems using orthography profiles (Translation and Multilingual Natural Language Processing 10). Berlin: Language Science Press.
    • Nag, Sonali, Treiman, Rebecca, & Snowling, Margaret J. (2010). Learning to spell in an alphasyllabary: The case of Kannada. Writing Systems Research, 2(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq001
    • Overmann, Karenleigh A. (2016). Beyond writing: The development of literacy in the ancient Near East. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000019
    • Pae, Hye K. (2018a). Written languages, East-Asian scripts, and cross-linguistic influences: An introduction. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Ratcliffe, Robert R. (2001). What do “phonemic” writing systems represent?: Arabic huruuf, Japanese kana, and the moraic principle. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 1–14.
    • Rimzhim, Anurag, Katz, Leonard, & Fowler, Carol A. (2014). Brāhmī-derived orthographies are typologically Āksharik but functionally predominantly alphabetic [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855618
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Salomon, Frank, & Hyland, Sabine. (2010). Guest editors' introduction [Special issue: Graphic pluralism: Native American systems of inscription and the colonial situation, edited by Frank Salomon & Sabine Hyland]. Ethnohistory, 57(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-2009-050
    • Schmitz, Philip C. (2014). Phoenician seal script. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 141–174). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Schniedewind, William M. (2019). The finger of the scribe: How scribes learned to write the Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2003). A formal computational analysis of Indic scripts. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 9–40). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Sproat, Richard, & Gutkin, Alexander. (2021). The taxonomy of writing systems: How to measure how logographic a system is. Computational Linguistics, 47(3), 477–528. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00409
    • Swank, Heidi. (2008). It all hinges on the vowels: Reconsidering the alphasyllabary classification. Written Language & Literacy, 11(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.1.06swa
    • Wang, Yifan. (2019). What are we calling “Latin script”? Name and reality in the grammatological terminology. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 91–109). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-wang
    • Woods, Christopher. (2010a). Introduction. Visible language: The earliest writing systems. in Christopher Woods (Ed.) with the assistance of Geoff Emberling & Emily Teeter, Visible language: Inventions of writing in the ancient Middle East and beyond (Oriental Institute Museum Publications 32) (pp. 15–25). Chicago, IL: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1996c). The first civilization. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 21–32). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by7
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Lehmann, Reinhard G. (2012). 27–30–22–26 – How many letters needs an alphabet? The case of Semitic. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 11–52). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • O'Connor, M. (2001). [Book review: Leonard Shlain, (1998), The alphabet versus the goddess: The conflict between word and image]. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 87–94.
    • Unseth, Peter. (2005). Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns
    • Waal, Willemijn. (2012). Writing in Anatolia: The origins of the Anatolian hieroglyphs and the introductions of the cuneiform script. Altorientalische Forschungen, 39(2), 287–315. https://doi.org/10.1524/aofo.2012.0020
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1996d). Methods of decipherment. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 141–159). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by3
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Sproat, Richard, & Gutkin, Alexander. (2021). The taxonomy of writing systems: How to measure how logographic a system is. Computational Linguistics, 47(3), 477–528. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00409
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1996e). Aramaic scripts for Aramaic languages. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 499–504). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by6
    • Crellin, Robert. (2019). Writing vowels in Punic: From morphography to phonography [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00026.cre
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Joyce, Terry, & Crellin, Robert. (2019). Introduction. Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?) [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00024.joy
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1996f). Mandaic. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 511–513). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by1
    • Crellin, Robert. (2019). Writing vowels in Punic: From morphography to phonography [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00026.cre
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1996g). The invention of writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 579–586). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by18
    • Baroni, Antonio. (2011). Alphabetic vs. non-alphabetic writing: Linguistic fit and natural tendencies. Rivista di Linguistica [Italian Journal of Linguistics], 23(2), 127–159.
    • Bright, William. (1999). A matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.03bri
    • Bright, William. (2000). A matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 63–71.
    • Eira, Christina. (1998). Authority and discourse: Towards a model for orthography selection. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 171–224. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.1.2.03eir
    • Eviatar, Zohar, & Share, David. (2013). Processing Semitic writing systems: Introduction to a special issue of Writing Systems Research [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.863086
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2011). Syllables and syllabaries: What writing systems tell us about syllable structure. In Charles Cairns & Eric Raimy (Eds.), Handbook of the syllable (Brill's Handbooks in Linguistics 1) (pp. 395–414). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004187405.i-464.118
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Maiocchi, Massimo. (2019). Writing in early Mesopotamia: The historical interplay of technology, cognition, and environment. In Alan C. Love & William Wimsatt (Eds.). Beyond the meme: Development and structure in cultural evolution (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22) (pp. 395–424). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctvnp0krm.13
    • Ramanujan, Keerthi, & Weekes, Brendan S. (2019). What is an akshara? In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 43–52). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_3
    • Salomon, Corinna. (2021). Comparative perspectives on the study of script transfer, and the origin of the runic script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 143–199). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-salo
    • Share, David L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(752). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
    • Smalley, William A., & Wimuttikosol, Nina. (1998). Another Hmong messianic script and its texts. Written Language & Literacy, 1(1), 103–128.
    • Swank, Heidi. (2008). It all hinges on the vowels: Reconsidering the alphasyllabary classification. Written Language & Literacy, 11(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.1.06swa
    • Unseth, Peter. (2016a). The international impact of Sequoyah's Cherokee syllabary. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.03uns
    • Zhou, Minglang. (2001). Language policy and reforms of writing systems for minority languages in China. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 31–65.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1996h). English. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 651–655). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1996i). Shorthand. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 807–820). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1996j). Analog and digital writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 883–892). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1997). The protean Arabic abjad. In Asma Afsaruddin & A. H. Mathias Zahniser (Eds.), Humanism, culture, and language in the Near East: Studies in honor of George Krotkoff (pp. 369–384). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns. Cited by10
    • Bondarev, Dmitry. (2019). Introduction: Orthographic polyphony in Arabic script. In Dmitry Bondarev, Alessandro Gori, & Lameen Souag (Eds.), Creating standards: Interactions with Arabic script in 12 manuscript cultures (Studies in Manuscript Cultures 16) (pp. 1–37). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110639063-001
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996c). The first civilization. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 21–32). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2006). On beyond alphabets [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.03dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009b). Two notes on terminology. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.09dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2014). The type and spread of Arabic script. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 25–39). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2021). Hebrew script for Jewish languages: A unique phenomenon. Written Language & Literacy, 24(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00050.dan
    • Kaye, Alan S. (1996). Adaptations of Arabic script. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 743–762). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Mumin, Meikal. (2014). The Arabic script in Africa: Understudied literacy. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 41–76). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1998). [Book review: D. Gary Miller, (1994), Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(1), 141–147. Cited by3
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1999). Some Semitic phonological considerations on the sibilants of the Greek alphabet. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 57–61.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2007). Kana digraphs and morae: A structural analysis. Written Language & Literacy, 10(1), 65–82.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (1999). Some Semitic phonological considerations on the sibilants of the Greek alphabet. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 57–61. Cited by4
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2000). On writing syllabaries: Three episodes of transfer [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 73–86.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Threatte, Leslie (1999). [Book review: Roger D. Woodard, (1997), Greek writing from Knossos to Homer: A linguistic interpretation of the origin of the Greek alphabet and the continuity of Ancient Greek literacy]. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 145–152.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (2000). On writing syllabaries: Three episodes of transfer [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 73–86. Cited by12
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2006). On beyond alphabets [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.03dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009b). Two notes on terminology. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.09dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2014). The type and spread of Arabic script. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 25–39). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Karanth, Prathibha. (2006). The Kagunita of Kannada - Learning to read and write an Indian alphasyllabary. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 389–404). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. (2000). Sejong's theory of literacy and writing [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin w. Kim, Elmer H., Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 13–45.
    • Kurzon, Dennis. (2013). Diacritics and the Perso-Arabic script [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 234–243, https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.799451
    • Lew, Sigrid. (2014). A linguistic analysis of the Lao writing system and its suitability for minority language orthographies [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.846843
    • Shenoy, Sunaina, & Wagner, Richard K. (2019). Language and literacy practices that influence bilingual and bi-literate acquisition in L1 Kannada and L2 English in Bangalore, India. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 373–388). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_19
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Swank, Heidi. (2009). A response to Peter T. Daniels. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.10swa
  • Daniels, P. T. (2000b). Syllables, consonants, and vowels in West Semitic writing. Lingua Posnaniensis, 42, 43–55. Cited by5
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2000). On writing syllabaries: Three episodes of transfer [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 73–86.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • Share, David L. & Daniels, Peter T. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
  • Daniels, Peter T. (2001). Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 43–80). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. [2017, Second edition, (pp. 75–94)] Cited by16
    • Baroni, Antonio. (2011). Alphabetic vs. non-alphabetic writing: Linguistic fit and natural tendencies. Rivista di Linguistica [Italian Journal of Linguistics], 23(2), 127–159.
    • Bhatia, Tej K. (2003). The Gurmukhi script and other writing systems of Punjab: History, structure and identity. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 181–213). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Buckley, Eugene. (2018). Core syllables vs. moraic writing [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00009.buc
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2000). On writing syllabaries: Three episodes of transfer [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 73–86.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009b). Two notes on terminology. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.09dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Joyce, Terry. (2004). Modeling the Japanese mental lexicon: Morphological, orthographic and phonological considerations. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in Psychological Research: Volume 31 (pp. 27–61). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Joyce, Terry. (2016). Writing systems and scripts. In Andrea Rocci & Louis de Saussure (Eds.), Verbal communication (Handbooks of Communication Science 3) (pp. 287–308). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255478-016
    • Joyce, Terry, & Borgwaldt, Susanne R. (2011). Typology of writing systems: Special issue introduction [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.01joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Pae, Hye K. (2018a). Written languages, East-Asian scripts, and cross-linguistic influences: An introduction. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Roberts, David. (2010a). Exploring written ambiguities can help assess where to mark tone. Writing Systems Research, 2(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq003
    • Share, David L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(752). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
    • Silva, Cláudia. (2011). Writing in Portuguese chats :) : A new wrtng systm? [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.07sil [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 147–159). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
  • Daniels, Peter T. (2006). On beyond alphabets [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.03dan Cited by17
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009b). Two notes on terminology. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.09dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2014). The type and spread of Arabic script. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 25–39). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2017a). The writing systems of Indo-European. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph, & Matthias Fritz (Eds.) in cooperation with Mark Wenthe, Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 41.1) (pp. 26–61). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261288-00
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Diller, Anthony. (2017). Early Thai orthography: Innovative tone-marking or recent hoax? Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00005.dil
    • Elti di Rodeano, Sveva. (2021). Scripts in contact: Transmission of the first alphabets. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 223–239). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-rode
    • Fedorova, Liudmila L. (2012). The development of structural characteristics of Brahmi script in derivative writing systems. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1). 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.01fed
    • Kurzon, Dennis. (2008). A brief note on diacritics. Written Language & Literacy, 11(1), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.1.07kur
    • Kurzon, Dennis. (2013). Diacritics and the Perso-Arabic script [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 234–243, https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.799451
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2018). What is natural in writing? Prolegomena to a Natural Grapholinguistics [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00010.mel
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Neef, Martin. (2015). Writing systems as modular objects: Proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics, 1, 708–721. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2015-0026
    • Neef, Martin, & Balestra, Miriam. (2011). Measuring graphematic transparency: German and Italian compared [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 109–142. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.06nee [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 113–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (2007). Littera ex occidente: Toward a functional history of writing. In Cynthia L. Miller (Eds.), Studies in Semitic and Afroasiatic linguistics presented to Gene B. Gragg (Studies in Ancient and Oriental Civilization 60) (pp. 53–68). Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. Cited by11
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2006). On beyond alphabets [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.03dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2014). The type and spread of Arabic script. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 25–39). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2017a). The writing systems of Indo-European. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph, & Matthias Fritz (Eds.) in cooperation with Mark Wenthe, Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 41.1) (pp. 26–61). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261288-00
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2012). Invention and borrowing in the development and dispersal of writing systems. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 1–10). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Lehmann, Reinhard G. (2012). 27–30–22–26 – How many letters needs an alphabet? The case of Semitic. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 11–52). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Share, David L. & Daniels, Peter T. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
  • Daniels, P. T. (2008). Writing systems of major and minor languages. In Braj Kachru, Yamuna Kachru, & S. N. Sridhar (Eds.), Language in South Asia (pp. 283–305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by6
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2017a). The writing systems of Indo-European. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph, & Matthias Fritz (Eds.) in cooperation with Mark Wenthe, Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 41.1) (pp. 26–61). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261288-00
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • Share, David L. & Daniels, Peter T. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
    • Vasanta, Duggirala. (2019). Akshara processing in Telugu depends on syllabic and phonemic sensitivity: Preliminary evidence from normal hearing and hearing-impaired children. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 119–138). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_7
  • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by14
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009b). Two notes on terminology. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.09dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2016). Writing systems and scripts. In Andrea Rocci & Louis de Saussure (Eds.), Verbal communication (Handbooks of Communication Science 3) (pp. 287–308). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255478-016
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2018). What is natural in writing? Prolegomena to a Natural Grapholinguistics [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00010.mel
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Neef, Martin. (2015). Writing systems as modular objects: Proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics, 1, 708–721. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2015-0026
    • Olson, David R. (2009a). A theory of reading/writing: From literacy to literature. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp005
    • Olson, David R. (2009b). Literacy, literacy policy, and the school. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 566–576). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2009c). Why literacy matters, then and now. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 385–403). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678466
    • Rimzhim, Anurag, Katz, Leonard, & Fowler, Carol A. (2014). Brāhmī-derived orthographies are typologically Āksharik but functionally predominantly alphabetic [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855618
    • Unseth, Peter. (2016a). The international impact of Sequoyah's Cherokee syllabary. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.03uns
    • Wang, Yifan. (2019). What are we calling “Latin script”? Name and reality in the grammatological terminology. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 91–109). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-wang
  • Daniels, Peter T. (2009b). Two notes on terminology. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.09dan Cited by5
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Fedorova, Liudmila L. (2012). The development of structural characteristics of Brahmi script in derivative writing systems. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1). 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.01fed
    • Fedorova, Liudmila L. (2021). On the typology of writing systems. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 805–824). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-fedo
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2018). What is natural in writing? Prolegomena to a Natural Grapholinguistics [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00010.mel
    • Vagh, Shaher Banu, & Nag, Sonali. (2019). The assessment of emergent and early literacy skills in the akshara languages. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 235–260). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_13
  • Daniels, P. T. (2013). The Arabic eriting system. In J. Owens (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Arabic linguistics (pp. 412–432). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by5
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2014). The type and spread of Arabic script. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 25–39). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2021). Hebrew script for Jewish languages: A unique phenomenon. Written Language & Literacy, 24(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00050.dan
    • Kurzon, Dennis. (2013). Diacritics and the Perso-Arabic script [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 234–243, https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.799451
  • Daniels, Peter T. (2014). The type and spread of Arabic script. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 25–39). Leiden; Boston: Brill. Cited by6
    • Bondarev, Dmitry. (2019). Introduction: Orthographic polyphony in Arabic script. In Dmitry Bondarev, Alessandro Gori, & Lameen Souag (Eds.), Creating standards: Interactions with Arabic script in 12 manuscript cultures (Studies in Manuscript Cultures 16) (pp. 1–37). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110639063-001
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Harbour, Daniel. (2021). Grammar drives writing system evolution. Lessons from the birth of vowels. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 201–221). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-harb
    • Ivušić, Branka. (2019). Developing consistency in the absence of standards – A manuscript as a melting-pot of languages, religions and writing systems. In Dmitry Bondarev, Alessandro Gori, & Lameen Souag (Eds.), Creating standards: Interactions with Arabic script in 12 manuscript cultures (Studies in Manuscript Cultures 16) (pp. 147–175). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110639063-007
    • Share, David L. & Daniels, Peter T. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
  • Daniels, Peter T. (2017a). The writing systems of Indo-European. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph, & Matthias Fritz (Eds.) in cooperation with Mark Wenthe, Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 41.1) (pp. 26–61). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261288-00 Cited by1
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (2017b). Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (Second edition) (pp. 75–94). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. [2001, First edition, (pp. 43–80)] Cited by6
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2018). What is natural in writing? Prolegomena to a Natural Grapholinguistics [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00010.mel
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020). Types of allography. Open Linguistics, 6, 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0006
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2021). On being a grapholinguist. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 125–141). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-mele
    • Share, David L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(752). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
  • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing. Cited by22
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Buckley, Eugene. (2018). Core syllables vs. moraic writing [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00009.buc
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2021). Hebrew script for Jewish languages: A unique phenomenon. Written Language & Literacy, 24(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00050.dan
    • Dürscheid, Christa, & Meletis, Dimitrios. (2019). Emojis: A grapholinguistic approach. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 167–183). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-duer
    • Elti di Rodeano, Sveva. (2021). Scripts in contact: Transmission of the first alphabets. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 223–239). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-rode
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2021). S
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2019). What do kanji graphs represent in the current Japanese writing system? Towards a unified model of kanji as written signs. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 185–208). Brest: Fluxus Editions. http://www.fluxus-editions.fr/gla1-hond.pdf
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2021). A modular theoretic approach to the Japanese writing system: Possibilities and challenges. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 621–643). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-hond
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2018). What is natural in writing? Prolegomena to a Natural Grapholinguistics [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00010.mel
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2021). On being a grapholinguist. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 125–141). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-mele
    • Osterkamp, Sven, & Schreiber, Gordian. (2021). Challenging the dichotomy between phonography and morphography: Transitions and gray areas. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 47–82). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-oste
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2019). EPS mid-career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819829696
    • Salomon, Corinna. (2021). Comparative perspectives on the study of script transfer, and the origin of the runic script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 143–199). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-salo
    • Share, David L. (2020). Extricating reading science from entrenched anglocentricism, eurocentricism, and alphabetism and embracing global diversity: A personal journey. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 4(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.28987/ijrld.4.2.3
    • Sproat, Richard, & Gutkin, Alexander. (2021). The taxonomy of writing systems: How to measure how logographic a system is. Computational Linguistics, 47(3), 477–528. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00409
    • van den Hout, Theo. (2020). A history of Hittite literacy: Writing and reading in Late Bronze-Age Anatolia (1650–1200 BC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860161
    • Wang, Yifan. (2019). What are we calling “Latin script”? Name and reality in the grammatological terminology. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 91–109). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-wang
    • Yassin, Rana, Share, David L., & Shalhoub-Awwad, Yasmin. (2020). Learning to spell in Arabic: The impact of script-specific visual-orthographic features. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:2059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02059
  • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2 Cited by1
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2021). Hebrew script for Jewish languages: A unique phenomenon. Written Language & Literacy, 24(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00050.dan
  • Daniels, Peter T. (2020). The decipherment of ancient Near Eastern languages. In Rebecca Hasselbach-Andee (Ed.), A companion to ancient Near Eastern languages (pp. 3–25). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Cited by1
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
  • Daniels, Peter T. (2021). Hebrew script for Jewish languages: A unique phenomenon. Written Language & Literacy, 24(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00050.dan
  • Daniels, Peter T., & Bright, William. (Eds.). (1996). The world's writing systems. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by140
    • Backhaus, Peter. (2007a). Alphabet ante portas: How English text invades Japanese public space. Visible Language, 41(1), 70–87.
    • Baird, Henry S. (2014). A brief history of documents and writing systems. In David Doermann & Karl Tombre (Eds.), Handbook of document image processing and recognition (pp. 3–10). London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-859-1_2
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2004). Rethinking written culture [A discussion of R. Harris, (2000), Rethinking writing]. Language Sciences, 26, 57–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2003.06.001
    • Baroni, Antonio. (2011). Alphabetic vs. non-alphabetic writing: Linguistic fit and natural tendencies. Rivista di Linguistica [Italian Journal of Linguistics], 23(2), 127–159.
    • Baroni, Antonio. (2013). Eye dialect and casual speech spelling: Orthographic variation in OT. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 24–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.808155
    • Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [2007, Second edition]
    • Bassetti, Benedetta, Vaid, Jyotsna, & Cook, Vivian. (2012). Interdisciplinary approaches to second language writing systems [Special issue: Second language writing systems, edited by Benedetta Bassetti, Jyotsna Vaid, & Vivian Cook]. Writing Systems Research, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.708977
    • Bennet, John. (2017a). Final reflections. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 247–253). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Bergerhausen, Johannes, & Huot-Marchand, Thomas. (2021). The missing scripts project. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 439–454). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-huot
    • Boeckeler, Erika Mary. (2017). Playful letters: A study in early modern alphabetics. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
    • Bondarev, Dmitry. (2014). Old Kanembu and Kanuri in Arabic script: Phonology through the graphic system. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 108–142). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Boot, Erik. (2010a). Substitution, substitution, substitution: The many faces of Maya writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 43–70). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Bright, William. (1999). A matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.03bri
    • Bright, William. (2000). A matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 63–71.
    • Bright, William. (2003). How written symbols change: Toward a historical grammatology. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 1–8). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Bright, William. (2005). [Book review: Henry Rogers, (2005), Writing systems: A linguistic approach]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 72–76.
    • Chang, Li-Yun, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2018). Visual factors in writing system variation: Measurement and implications for reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 49–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Changizi, Mark A., & Shimojo, Shinsuke. (2005). Character complexity and redundancy in writing systems over human history. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2942
    • Chrisomalis, Stephen. (2009). The origins and co-evolution of literacy and numeracy. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 59–74). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Crellin, Robert. (2019). Writing vowels in Punic: From morphography to phonography [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00026.cre
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Dai, Jumana, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Share, David L. (2013). The influence of orthographic structure on printed word learning in Arabic. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.827563
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2000). On writing syllabaries: Three episodes of transfer [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 73–86.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2001). Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 43–80). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. [2017, Second edition, (pp. 75–94)]
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2006). On beyond alphabets [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.03dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009b). Two notes on terminology. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.09dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2017a). The writing systems of Indo-European. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph, & Matthias Fritz (Eds.) in cooperation with Mark Wenthe, Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 41.1) (pp. 26–61). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261288-00
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2010a). Introducing writing on writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 1–5). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2012). Invention and borrowing in the development and dispersal of writing systems. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 1–10). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2014). The cultural transmission of script in Africa: The presence of syllabaries. Scripta, 6, 121–143.
    • Diller, Anthony. (2017). Early Thai orthography: Innovative tone-marking or recent hoax? Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00005.dil
    • Eira, Christina. (1998). Authority and discourse: Towards a model for orthography selection. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 171–224. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.1.2.03eir
    • Elbeheri, Gad, & Everatt, John. (2007). Literacy ability and phonological processing skills amongst dyslexic and non-dyslexic speakers of Arabic. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9031-0
    • Ellis, Nick C., Miwa, Natsume, Stavropoulou, Katerina, Hoxhallari, Lorenc, Van Daal, Victor H.P., Polyzoe, Nicoletta, Tsipa, Maria-Louisa, & Petalas, Michalis. (2004). The effects of orthographic depth on learning to read alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic scripts. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 438–468. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.4.5
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Eviatar, Zohar, & Share, David. (2013). Processing Semitic writing systems: Introduction to a special issue of Writing Systems Research [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.863086
    • Farmer, Steve, Sproat, Richard, & Witzel, Michael. (2004). The collapse of the Indus-script thesis: The myth of a literate Harappan civilization. Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 11(2), 19–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/ejvs.2004.2.620
    • Fear, Douglas. (2015). utā pavastāyā utā carmā grftam āha—Written on clay and parchment: Old Persian writing and allography in Iranian. In Susanne Enderwitz & Rebecca Sauer (Eds.), Communication and materiality: Written and unwritten communication in pre-modern societies (Materiale Textkulturen 8) (pp. 73–92). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Finkel, Irving. (2010). Strange byways in cuneiform writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 9–25). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Gautam, Seema, Everatt, John, Sadeghi, Amir, & McNeill, Brigid. (2019). Multiliteracy in akshara and alphabetic orthographies: The case of Punjabi, Hindi and English learners in primary schools in Punjab. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 139–160). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_8
    • Gillam, Richard. (2003). Unicode demystified: A practical programmer's guide to the encoding standard. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2011). Syllables and syllabaries: What writing systems tell us about syllable structure. In Charles Cairns & Eric Raimy (Eds.), Handbook of the syllable (Brill's Handbooks in Linguistics 1) (pp. 395–414). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004187405.i-464.118
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2021). S
    • Handel, Zev. (2019). Sinography: The borrowing and adaptation of the Chinese script (Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis 1). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352223
    • Haralambous, Yannis. (2007). Fonts & encodings: From Unicode to advanced typography and everything in between (translated by P. Scott Horne). Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
    • Haralambous, Yannis, & Dürst, Martin. (2019). Unicode from a linguistic point of view. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 127–166). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-hara1
    • Hockett, Charles F. (2003). Two lectures on writing [prepared for publication by Peter T. Daniels]. Written Language & Literacy, 6(2), 131–175.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2007). Kana digraphs and morae: A structural analysis. Written Language & Literacy, 10(1), 65–82.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2011). The relation of orthographic units to linguistic units in the Japanese writing system: An analysis of kanji, kana and kanji-okurigana writing. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Tsukuba, Japan.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2019). What do kanji graphs represent in the current Japanese writing system? Towards a unified model of kanji as written signs. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 185–208). Brest: Fluxus Editions. http://www.fluxus-editions.fr/gla1-hond.pdf
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2021). A modular theoretic approach to the Japanese writing system: Possibilities and challenges. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 621–643). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-hond
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen, Baines, John, & Cooper, Jerrold. (2003). Last writing: Script obsolescence in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Mesoamerica. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45(3), 430–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417503000227
    • Iyengar, Arvind. (2018). Variation in Perso-Arabic and Devanāgarī Sindhī orthographies: An overview. Written Language & Literacy, 21(2), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00014.iye
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Kahn-Horwitz, Janina, Kuash, Sara, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Schwartz, Mila. (2014). How do previously acquired languages affect acquisition of English as a foreign language: The case of Circassian [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.03kah
    • Kandhadai, Padmapriya, & Sproat, Richard. (2010). Impact of spatial ordering of graphemes in alphasyllabic scripts on phonemic awareness in Indic languages. Writing Systems Research, 2(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq009
    • Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. (2000). Sejong's theory of literacy and writing [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin w. Kim, Elmer H., Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 13–45.
    • Kuipers, Joel. (2003). Indic scripts of insular Southeast Asia: Changing structures and functions. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 241–262). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Leikin, Mark, Schwartz, Mila, & Share, David L. (2010). General and specific benefits of bi-literate bilingualism: A Russian–Hebrew study of beginning literacy [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9210-x
    • Levin, Iris, Aram, Dorit, Tolchinsky, Liliana, & McBride, Catherine. (2013). Maternal mediation of writing and children's early spelling and reading: The Semitic abjad versus the European alphabet [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.797335
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • Lyons, Martyn, & Marquilhas, Rita (Eds.). (2017). Approaches to the history of written culture: A world inscribed (New Directions in Book History). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54136-5
    • Machida, Kazuhiko. (2003). Levels of character-glyph transduction in Indic scripts: The case of Devanagari. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 369–381). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Maiocchi, Massimo. (2019). Writing in early Mesopotamia: The historical interplay of technology, cognition, and environment. In Alan C. Love & William Wimsatt (Eds.). Beyond the meme: Development and structure in cultural evolution (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22) (pp. 395–424). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctvnp0krm.13
    • Man, John. (2000). Alpha Beta: How 26 letters shaped the Western world. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Manohar, Kavya, & Thottingal, Santhosh. (2019). Malayalam orthographic reforms. Impact on language and popular culture. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 329–351). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-mano
    • McGuinness, Diane. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Mehlem, Ulrich. (2007). The graphematic representation of prepositional phrases in experimental writing of Tarifit Berber by Moroccan students in Germany and Morocco [Special issue: Constraints on spelling changes, edited by Guido Nottbusch & Eliane Segers]. Written Language & Literacy, 10(2), 195–218.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2021). On being a grapholinguist. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 125–141). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-mele
    • Militello, Pietro M. (2017). Management, power and non-literate communication in Prepalatial and Palatial Messara. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 55–72). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Moran, Steven, & Cysouw, Michael. (2018). The Unicode cookbook for linguists: Managing writing systems using orthography profiles (Translation and Multilingual Natural Language Processing 10). Berlin: Language Science Press.
    • Mumin, Meikal. (2014). The Arabic script in Africa: Understudied literacy. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 41–76). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Neef, Sonja. (2008) Abdruck und Spur: Handschrift im Zeitalter ihrer technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos. [English translation: Mathews, Anthony (Translator). (2011). Imprint and trace: Handwriting in the age of technology. London: Reaktion Books]
    • Neijt, Anneke. (2002). The interfaces of writing and grammar. In Martin Neef, Anneke Neijt, & Richard Sproat (Eds.), The relation of writing to spoken language (Linguistische Arbeiten 460) (pp. 11–34). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
    • O'Connor, M. (2001). [Book review: Leonard Shlain, (1998), The alphabet versus the goddess: The conflict between word and image]. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 87–94.
    • Osterkamp, Sven, & Schreiber, Gordian. (2021). Challenging the dichotomy between phonography and morphography: Transitions and gray areas. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 47–82). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-oste
    • Pae, Hye K. (2018a). Written languages, East-Asian scripts, and cross-linguistic influences: An introduction. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Penn, Gerald. (2001). [Book review: Richard Sproat, (2000), A computational theory of writing systems]. Written Language & Literacy, 4(2), 218–223.
    • Pettersson, John Sören. (1998). [Book review: Florian Coulmas, (1996), The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 253–257.
    • Pope, Maurice. (1975). The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphics to Linear B. London: Thames & Hudson: New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. [1999, Revised edition, The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphs to Maya script. London; New York: Thames & Hudson]
    • Powell, Barry B. (2009). Writing: Theory and history of the technology of civilization. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Primus, Beatrice. (2004). A featural analysis of the Modern Roman Alphabet [Special issue: From letter to sound, edited by Martin Neef & Beatrice Primus]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(2), 235–274. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.2.06pri
    • Ratcliffe, Robert R. (2001). What do “phonemic” writing systems represent?: Arabic huruuf, Japanese kana, and the moraic principle. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 1–14.
    • Robinson, Andrew. (2009b). Writing and script: A very short introduction (Very Short Introductions). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Salomon, Richard G. (2000). Typological observations on the Indic script group and its relationship to other alphasyllabaries [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj. B. Kachu]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 87–103.
    • Salomon, Richard. (2008). Whatever happened to Kharoṣṭhī? The fate of a forgotten Indic script. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 139–155). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2016b). Writing systems: Methods for recording language. In Keith Allan (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics (pp. 47–61). London; New York, NY: Routledge.
    • Schmitz, Philip C. (2014). Phoenician seal script. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 141–174). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Schoch, Robert M., & Melka, Tomi S. (2021). A “Sacred Amulet from Easter Island—1885/6—”: Analyzing enigmatic glyphic characters in the context of the rongorongo script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 847–903). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-scho
    • Schwartz, Mila, Geva, Esther, Share, David L., & Leikin, Mark. (2007). Learning to read in English as third language: The cross-linguistic transfer of phonological processing skills. Written Language & Literacy, 10(1), 25–52.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Leikin, Mark, & Share, David L. (2005). Bi-literate bilingualism versus mono-literate bilingualism: A longitudinal study of reading acquisition in Hebrew (L2) among Russian-speaking (L1) children [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 179–206.
    • Seidenberg, Mark S. (2013). The science of reading and its educational implications [Special issue: Learning to read and write: Connections between written and spoken language]. Language Learning and Development, 9(4), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2013.812017
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Share, David L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(752). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
    • Share, David L. (2017). Learning to read Hebrew. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 155–180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Share, David L. (2020). Extricating reading science from entrenched anglocentricism, eurocentricism, and alphabetism and embracing global diversity: A personal journey. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 4(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.28987/ijrld.4.2.3
    • Share, David L., Shany, Michal, & Lipka, Orly. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Hebrew. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 152–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.008
    • Smalley, William A., & Wimuttikosol, Nina. (1998). Another Hmong messianic script and its texts. Written Language & Literacy, 1(1), 103–128.
    • Sproat, Richard. (1998). [Book review: Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), (1996), The world's writing systems]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(1), 129–137.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2016). English among the writing systems of the world. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 27–40). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Strauch, Ingo. (2012). The character of the Indian Kharoṣṭhī script and the “Sanskrit Revolution”: A writing system between identity and assimilation. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 131–168). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Street, Brian V., & Lefstein, Adam. (2007). Literacy: An advanced resource book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Swank, Heidi. (2008). It all hinges on the vowels: Reconsidering the alphasyllabary classification. Written Language & Literacy, 11(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.1.06swa
    • Swank, Heidi. (2009). A response to Peter T. Daniels. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.10swa
    • Taibah, Nadia J., & Haynes, Charles W. (2011). Contributions of phonological processing skills to reading skills in Arabic speaking children [Special issue: Literacy acquisition in Arabic, edited by Abdessatar Mahfoudhi, John Everatt & Gad Elbeheri]. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 1019–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9273-8
    • Tenny, Carol. (2016). A linguist looks at AAC: Language representation systems for augmentative and alternative communication, compared with writing systems and natural language. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 84–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.959459
    • Thaine, Patricia, & Penn, Gerald. (2019). Vowel and consonant classification through spectral decomposition. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp. 367–386). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-thai
    • The Unicode Consortium. (1991). The Unicode Standard: Version 1.0. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [1996, Version 2.0; 2003, Version, 4.0.0; 2005, Version 5.0; 2011, Version 6.0.0; 2016, Version 9.0.0; 2018, Version 11.0.0]
    • Tonietti, Maria Vittoria. (2015). The Assyrian model: Les syllabaires d'Ebla (2350 av. J.-C.) et les abjads du IIe millénaire av. J.-C. In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 49–72). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    • Unseth, Peter. (2005). Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns
    • van den Hout, Theo. (2020). A history of Hittite literacy: Writing and reading in Late Bronze-Age Anatolia (1650–1200 BC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860161
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, & Perfetti, Charles. (2017). Introduction: Operating principles in learning to read. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Vitrano-Wilson, Seth. (2018). Tai Dam orthographies: Multigraphia, mismatching tones, and mutual borrowing of tone marking devices among three scripts. Written Language & Literacy, 21(2), 198–237. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00015.vit
    • Vitrano-Wilson, Seth, Gehrmann, Ryan, Miller, Carolyn, & Xaiyavong, Cheung. (2018). Tone marks as vowel diacritics in two scripts: Repurposing tone marks for non-tonal phenomena in Cado and other Southeast Asian languages. Writing Systems Research, 10(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2018.1493409
    • Waal, Willemijn. (2018). On the “Phoenician letters”: The case for an early transmission of the Greek alphabet from an archaeological, epigraphic and linguistic perspective. Aegean Studies, 1, 83–125.
    • Wang, Feng, Tsai, Yaching, & Wang, William S.-Y. (2009). Chinese literacy. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 386–417). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Wang, Yifan. (2019). What are we calling “Latin script”? Name and reality in the grammatological terminology. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 91–109). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-wang
    • Weingarten, Rüdiger. (2011). Comparative graphematics [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 12–38. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.02wei [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 13–39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Whittaker, Gordon. (2011). Writing systems. In Patrick Colm Hogan (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences (pp. 935–939). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Winskel, Heather, & Ratitamkul, Theeraporn. (2019). Learning to read and write in Thai. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 217–231). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_12
    • Woods, Christopher. (2010a). Introduction. Visible language: The earliest writing systems. in Christopher Woods (Ed.) with the assistance of Geoff Emberling & Emily Teeter, Visible language: Inventions of writing in the ancient Middle East and beyond (Oriental Institute Museum Publications 32) (pp. 15–25). Chicago, IL: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
    • Yassin, Rana, Share, David L., & Shalhoub-Awwad, Yasmin. (2020). Learning to spell in Arabic: The impact of script-specific visual-orthographic features. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:2059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02059
    • Zadka, Małgorzata. (2018). Semasiographic principle in Linear B inscriptions. Writing Systems Research, 10(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2019.1588835
    • Zhou, Minglang. (2001). Language policy and reforms of writing systems for minority languages in China. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 31–65.
  • Daniels, P. T., & Share, D. L. (2018). Writing system variation and its consequences for reading and dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1379082 Cited by10
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • Joshi, R. Malatesha, & McBride, Catherine. (2019). Introduction: Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 3–9). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_1
    • McClung, Nicola A., & Pearson, P. David. (2019). Reading comprehension across languages: Seven European orthographies and two international literacy assessments. Written Language & Literacy, 22(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00019.mcc
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Nakamura, Pooja, Joshi, R. Malatesha, & Ji, Xuejun Ryan. (2019). Biliteracy spelling acquisition in akshara and English. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 103–117). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_6
    • Share, David L. (2020). Extricating reading science from entrenched anglocentricism, eurocentricism, and alphabetism and embracing global diversity: A personal journey. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 4(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.28987/ijrld.4.2.3
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Perfetti, Charles, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Introduction: Developmental dyslexia – A cross-linguistic perspective. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.001
    • Wijayathilake, Marasinghe A. D. K., & Parrila, Rauno. (2019). Reading and writing Sinhala. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 195–216). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_11
    • Yassin, Rana, Share, David L., & Shalhoub-Awwad, Yasmin. (2020). Learning to spell in Arabic: The impact of script-specific visual-orthographic features. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:2059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02059
  • Danielsson, Kristina. (2001). Beginning readers' sensitivity to different linguistic levels: An error and correction analysis at the lexical, syntactic, and semantic levels. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 395–421.
  • Danks, Joseph H., & Hill, Gregory O. (1981). An interactive analysis of oral reading. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Dannenbring, G. L., & Briand, K. (1982). Semantic priming and the word repetition effect in a lexical decision task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 435–444. Cited by4
    • Feldman, Laurie B. (1992). Morphological relationships revealed through the repetition priming task. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 239–254). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Feldman, Laurie B., & Andjelković, Darinka. (1992). Morphological analysis in word recognition. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Phonology, orthography, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 343–360). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Gijsel, Martine A. R., van Bon, Wim H. J., & Bosman, Anna M. T. (2004). Assessing reading skills by means of paper-and-pencil lexical decision: Issues of reliability, repetition, and word-pseudoword ratio. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(5), 517–536.
    • Weekes, Brendan, Chen, May Jane, & Yu, Bo-lin. (1997). Repetition priming effects of Chinese characters and pseudocharacters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 171–186). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  • Dānwiwat, Nanthanā. (1987). The Thai writing system (Forum Phoneticum 39). Hamburg: Buske. Cited by6
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Diller, Anthony. (1996). Thai and Lao writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 457–466). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Diller, Anthony. (2017). Early Thai orthography: Innovative tone-marking or recent hoax? Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00005.dil
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Patel, Purushottam G. (1995). Brahmi scripts, Orthographic units and reading acquisition. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 265–275). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Tagg, Caroline, & Seargeant, Philip. (2012). Writing systems at play in Thai-English online interactions [Special issue: The writing system at play, edited by Vivian Cook, Benedetta Bassetti, & Jyotsna Vaid]. Writing Systems Research, 4, 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2011.628583
  • Danzak, Robin L. (2020). (Re)constructing voices: Immigrant women read and write for social justice and themselves. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 147–161). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_9
  • Danzel, Theodor W. (1912). Die Anfänge der Schrift. Leipzig. [1929, second edition] Cited by3
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (1997). Rongorongo: The Easter Island script: History, traditions, texts (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 14). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Knobloch, Clemens. (1996). Historisch-systematischer Aufriß der psychologischen Schreibforschung [Historical outline of psychological research on writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 983–992). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Danzel, Theodor W. (1912). Die Anfänge der Schrift (Second edition). Leipzig. [1912, First edition] Cited by4
    • Diringer, David. (1948). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind. London: Hutchinson; New York: Philosophical Library. [1953, Second revised edition; 1968, Third revised edition (2 volumes), London: Hutchinson; New York: Funk & Wagnalls; 1996, Reprinted, Munshiram Maniharlal Publishers]
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
  • Danziger, Eve, & Pederson, Eric (1998). Through the looking glass: Literacy, writing systems and mirror-image discrimination. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.1.2.02dan Cited by5
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Kolinsky, Régine. (2015). How learning to read influences language and cognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 377–393). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Pederson, Eric 2003). Mirror-image discrimination among nonliterate, monoliterate, and biliterate Tamil subjects. Written Language & Literacy, 6(1), 71–91.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Darnell, J. C., Dobbs-Allsopp, F. W., Lundberg, M. J., McCarter, P. K., & Zuckerman, B. (2005). Two early alphabetic inscriptions from the Wadi el-Ḥôl: New evidence for the origin of the alphabet from the Western Desert of Egypt. Annual of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 59, 63–124. Cited by18
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Goldwasser, Orly. (2015). The invention of the alphabet: On “lost papyri” and the Egyptian “alphabet”. In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 124–141). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    • Hamilton, Gordon J. (2014). Reconceptualizing the periods of early alphabetic scripts. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 30–55). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Harbour, Daniel. (2021). Grammar drives writing system evolution. Lessons from the birth of vowels. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 201–221). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-harb
    • Koller, Aaron. (2018). The diffusion of the alphabet in the second millennium BCE: On the movements of scribal ideas from Egypt to the Levant, Mesopotamia, and Yemen. Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections, 20, 1–14.
    • Küster, Marc Wilhelm. (2016). Writing beyond the letter. Tijdschrift Voor Mediageschiendenis, 19(2). doi10.18146/2213-7653.2016.262
    • Lam, Joseph. (2010). The invention and development of the alphabet. In Christopher Woods (Ed.) with the assistance of Geoff Emberling & Emily Teeter, Visible language: Inventions of writing in the ancient Middle East and beyond (Oriental Institute Museum Publications 32) (pp. 189–195). Chicago, IL: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
    • Puech, Emile. (2015). Aux sources de l'alphabet: De quelques anciens témoignages en écriture alphabétique. In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 73–123). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    • Rollston, Christopher A. (2014b). The Iron Age Phoenician script. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 72–99). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
    • Tonietti, Maria Vittoria. (2015). The Assyrian model: Les syllabaires d'Ebla (2350 av. J.-C.) et les abjads du IIe millénaire av. J.-C. In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 49–72). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    • Waal, Willemijn. (2018). On the “Phoenician letters”: The case for an early transmission of the Greek alphabet from an archaeological, epigraphic and linguistic perspective. Aegean Studies, 1, 83–125.
    • Yasur-Landau, Assaf. (2017). Non-scribal communication in the Southern Levant during the Middle and Late Bronze Ages. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 207–219). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  • Das, Tanusree, Bapi, Raju S., Padakannaya, Prakash, & Singh, Nandini C. (2011). Cortical network for reading linear words in an alphasyllabary. [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9241-3 Cited by1
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Das, T., Kumar, U., Bapi, R. S., Padakannaya, P., & Singh, N. C. (2010). Neural representation of an alphasyllabary – The story of Devanagari. Current Science, 97, 1033–1038. Cited by7
    • Das, Tanusree, Bapi, Raju S., Padakannaya, Prakash, & Singh, Nandini C. (2011). Cortical network for reading linear words in an alphasyllabary. [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9241-3
    • Kandhadai, Padmapriya, & Sproat, Richard. (2010). Impact of spatial ordering of graphemes in alphasyllabic scripts on phonemic awareness in Indic languages. Writing Systems Research, 2(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq009
    • Mishra, Ramesh Kumar. (2019). Cross-modal processing of orthography-phonology interface in Hindi-English bilinguals. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 353–371). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_18
    • Nag, Sonali. (2017b). Learning to read alphasyllabaries. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 75–97). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Share, David L. & Daniels, Peter T. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
    • Wijayathilake, Marasinghe A. D. K., & Parrila, Rauno. (2019). Reading and writing Sinhala. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 195–216). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_11
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dasgupta, Probal, & Sengupta, Gautam. (2003). The Bangla-Asamiya script and its representation in Unicode. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 214–240). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. Cited by2
    • Nag, Sonali. (2014a). Akshara-phonology mappings: The common yet uncommon case of the consonant cluster [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855621
    • Nag, Sonali. (2017b). Learning to read Kannada and other languages of South Asia. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 104-126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Daswani, Chander J. (1994). The sphere of Indian writing. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 451-472). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Dávalos, Amira, & Alvarado, Mónica. (2010). Elementary school children's decisions about paragraph organization [Special issue: Developmental aspects of written language, edited by Sofía A. Vernon & Mónica Alvarado]. Written Language & Literacy, 13(2), 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.2.04dav
  • Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., & Jonasson, J. T. (1978). Phonological recoding and lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 6, 391–402. Cited by11
    • Allport, D. Alan. (1979). Word recognition in reading (tutorial paper). In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 227–257). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Berent, Iris, & Van Orden, Guy C. (2000). Homophone dominance modulates the phonemic-masking effect. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 133–167.
    • Friesen, Deanna C., & Joanisse, Marc F. (2012). Homophone effects in deaf readers: Evidence from lexical decision. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9275-6
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Kinoshita, Sachiko. (1998). The role of phonology in reading Japanese: Or why I don't hear myself when reading Japanese [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 439–455. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 285–301). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Lesgold, Alan M., & Perfetti, Charles A. (1981). Interactive processes in reading: Where do we stand? In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 387–407). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Pollatsek, Alexander, & Lesch, Mary. (1996). The perception of words and letters. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 957–971). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
  • David, Madeleine. (1965). Le débat sur les écritures et l'hiéroglyphe au XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Paris. Cited by4
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    • Fleming, Juliet. (2016). Cultural graphology: Writing after Derrida. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    • Pope, Maurice. (1975). The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphics to Linear B. London: Thames & Hudson: New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. [1999, Revised edition, The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphs to Maya script. London; New York: Thames & Hudson]
    • Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte. (1994). Geschichte der Reflexion über Schrift und Schriftlichkeit [History of the reflection on writing and its use]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig, (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 102–121). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110111293.1.2.102
  • Davidse, Neeltje J., De Jong, Maria T., Bus, Adriana G., Huijbregts, Stephan C. J., & Swaab, Hanna. (2011). Cognitive and environmental predictors of early literacy skills [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9233-3 Cited by1
    • Sénéchal, Monique. (2015). Young children's home literacy experiences. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 397–414). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Davidson, Andrew. (2019). Writing: The re-construction of language. Language Sciences, 72, 134–149. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.09.004 Cited by2
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2021). On being a grapholinguist. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 125–141). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-mele
  • Davies, E. E. (1987). Eyeplay: On some uses of non-standard spelling. Language and Communication, 7(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271‑5309(87)90013‑9 Cited by7
    • Forster, Iris, Borgwald, Susanne R., & Neef, Martin. (2012). Form follows function: Interjections and onomatopoetica in comics [Special issue: The writing system at play, edited by Vivian Cook, Benedetta Bassetti, & Jyotsna Vaid]. Writing Systems Research, 4, 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.751348
    • Joyce, Terry, & Masuda, Hisashi. (2019). On the notions of graphematic representation and orthography from the perspective of the Japanese writing system [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00028.joy
    • Kataoka, Kuniyoshi. (2003). Form and function of emotive pictorial signs in casual letter writing. Written Language & Literacy, 6(1), 1–29.
    • Sebba, Mark. (2007). Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486739
    • Sebba, Mark. (2015). Iconisation, attribution and branding in orthography [Special issue: The historical sociolinguistics of spelling, edited by Laura Villa & Rik Vosters]. Written Language & Literacy, 18(2), 208–227. doi 10.1075/wll.18.2.02seb
    • Shortis, Tim. (2016). Texting and other messaging: Written system in digitally mediated vernaculars. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 487–516). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Wong, Andrew D. (2013). Brand names and unconventional spelling: A two-pronged analysis of the orthographic construction of brand identity. Written Language & Literacy, 16(2), 115–145. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.2.01won
  • Davies, Philip R. (2013). The dissemination of written texts. In Philip R. Davies & Thomas Römer (Eds.), Writing the Bible: Scribes, scribalism and script (pp. 35–46). Durham: Acumen.
  • Davies, Philip R., & Römer, Thomas (Eds.). (2013). Writing the Bible: Scribes, scribalism and script. Durham: Acumen.
  • Davies, Robert A. I., & Cuetos, Fernando. (2010). Reading acquisition and dyslexia in Spanish. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 155–180). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
  • Davies, W. V. (1987). Egyptian hieroglyphs (Reading the past). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press. [1990, In J. T. Hooker (Ed.), Reading the past: Ancient writing from cuneiform to the alphabet (pp. 75–135). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press] Cited by16
    • Bodel, John, & Houston, Stephen (Eds.). (2021). The hidden language of graphic signs: Cryptic writing and meaningful marks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886505
    • Bolter, Jay David. (1991). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [2001, Second edition]
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996d). Methods of decipherment. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 141–159). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Farmer, Steve, Sproat, Richard, & Witzel, Michael. (2004). The collapse of the Indus-script thesis: The myth of a literate Harappan civilization. Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 11(2), 19–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/ejvs.2004.2.620
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen, Baines, John, & Cooper, Jerrold. (2003). Last writing: Script obsolescence in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Mesoamerica. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45(3), 430–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417503000227
    • Judson, Anna P. (2017). The decipherment: People, process, challenges. In Yannis Galanakis, Anastasia Christophilopoulou & James Grime (Eds.), Codebreakers and groundbreakers (pp. 15–29). Cambridge: The Fitzwilliam Museum.
    • Meltzer, Edmund S. (1994). Hieratic is beautiful: Ancient Egyptian calligraphy revisited. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 293–301). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Mikulska, Katarzyna. (2019b). The system of graphic communication in the Central Mexican divinatory codices from the functional perspective [translation by Jerome A. Offner]. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 41–92). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c002
    • Ritner, Robert K. (1996a). Egyptian writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 73–84). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Robinson, Andrew. (1995). The story of writing: Alphabets, hieroglyphs & pictograms. London: Thames & Hudson. [2007, Revised edition]
  • Davies, W. V. (1990). Egyptian hieroglyphs. In J. T. Hooker (Ed.), Reading the past: Ancient writing from cuneiform to the alphabet (pp. 75–135). London: The British Museum Press; Berkeley: University of California Press. [1987, Egyptian hieroglyphs (Reading the past). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley: University of California Press] Cited by12
    • Boltz, William G. (1994). The origin and early development of the Chinese writing system (American Oriental Series 78). New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society. [2003, reprinted with corrections]
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1984). A history of writing. London: British Library. [1987, Second edition; 1992, Third revised edition, London: British Library; New York: Abbeville Press]
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1995). Scripts and writing systems: A historical perspective. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 19–30). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Haarmann, Harald. (1994b). Entstehung und Verbreitung von Alphabetschriften [Evolution and spread of alphabetic scripts] In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 329–347). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Handel, Zev. (2019). Sinography: The borrowing and adaptation of the Chinese script (Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis 1). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352223
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Powell, Barry B. (2009). Writing: Theory and history of the technology of civilization. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Robinson, Andrew. (2009b). Writing and script: A very short introduction (Very Short Introductions). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Salomon, Richard G. (2000). Typological observations on the Indic script group and its relationship to other alphasyllabaries [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj. B. Kachu]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 87–103.
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
  • Davis, B. (2014). Minoan stone vessels with Linear A inscriptions (Aegaeum 36). Leuven; Liège: Peeters. Cited by6
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Judson, Anna P. (2019). Orthographic variation as evidence for the development of the Linear B writing system [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00025.jud
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
    • Salgarella, Ester, & Castellan, Simon. (2021). SigLA: The signs of Linear A. A palæographical database. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 945–962). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-salg
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2019). Writing and society in ancient Cyprus (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316729977
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
  • Davis, Chris, & Kim, Jeesun. (2006). Changing circumstance: How flexible is lexical access? In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 207–228). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
  • Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organizing lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New South Wales, Australia. Cited by15
    • Andrews, Sally. (2006b). All about words: A lexicalist perspective on reading. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 318–347). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Bijeljac-Babic, Ranka, Millogo, Victor, Farioli, Fernand, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). A developmental investigation of word length effects in reading using a new on-line word identification paradigm. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(4), 411–431.
    • Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). Sublexical representations and the ‘front end’ of visual word recognition [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000288 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 1–10). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Castles, Anne, & Nation, Kate. (2006). How does orthographic learning happen? In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From ink marks to ideas: Challenges and controversies about word recognition and reading (pp. 151–179). Hove; New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203841211
    • Davis, Colin J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
    • Davis, Colin J. (2012). The orthographic similarity of printed words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 185–206). London: Psychology Press.
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Ktori, Maria, & Pitchford, Nicola J. (2010). Letter position encoding across deep and transparent orthographies. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 69–85). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Pollatsek, Alexander, & Hyönä, Jukka. (2006). Processing of morphemically complex words in context: What can be learned from eye movements. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 275–298). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Schoonbaert, Sofie, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000198 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 12–42). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Sibley, Daragh E., & Kello, Christopher T. (2012). Learned orthographic representations facilitates large-scale modeling of word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 28–51). London: Psychology Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Method, 37, 65–70. Cited by6
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
    • Davis, Colin J. (2012). The orthographic similarity of printed words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 185–206). London: Psychology Press.
    • Marian, Viorica. (2017). Orthographic and phonological neighborhood databases across multiple languages [Special issue: Orthographic databases and lexicons, edited by Lynne Cahill & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 20(1), 6–26. doi 10.1075/wll.20.1.02mar
    • Perea, Manuel. (2015). Neighborhoods effects in visual word recognition and reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 76–87). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Taft, Marcus, Xu, Joe, & Li, Sonny. (2017). Letter coding in visual word recognition: The impact of embedded words. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.05.002
    • Tellings, Agnes, & Bouts, Lex. (2011). Dutch elementary school children's attribution of meaning to written pseudowords. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9225-3
  • Davis, Colin J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Hove; New York: Psychology Press. Cited by4
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
    • Kinoshita, Sachiko. (2015). Visual word recognition in the Bayesian reader framework. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 63–75). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2016). Processing the written word. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 453–469). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738 Cited by17
    • Andrews, Sally. (2012). Individual differences in skilled visual word recognition and reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 151–172). London: Psychology Press.
    • Andrews, Sally. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Beyersmann, Elisabeth, Kezilas, Yvette, Coltheart, Max, Castles, Anne, Ziegler, Johannes C., Taft, Marcus, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2018). Taking the book from the bookshelf: Masked constituent priming effects from compound words and nonwords. Journal of Cognition, 1(1): 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.11
    • Bosse, Marie-Line. (2015). Learning to read and spell: How children acquire word orthographic knowledge. Child Development Perspectives, 9(4), 222–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12133
    • Davis, Colin J. (2012). The orthographic similarity of printed words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 185–206). London: Psychology Press.
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2012). A parallel activation model with a sequential twist. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 52–69). London: Psychology Press.
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Grainger, Jonathan & Dufau, Stéphane. (2012). The front end of visual word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 159–184). London: Psychology Press.
    • Kinoshita, Sachiko. (2015). Visual word recognition in the Bayesian reader framework. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 63–75). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Norris, Dennis. (2013). Models of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.003
    • Perea, Manuel. (2015). Neighborhoods effects in visual word recognition and reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 76–87). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Taft, Marcus, Xu, Joe, & Li, Sonny. (2017). Letter coding in visual word recognition: The impact of embedded words. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.05.002
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2016). Processing the written word. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 453–469). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Zevin, Jason D. (2019). Modeling developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 372–390). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.017
  • Davis, Colin J. (2012). The orthographic similarity of printed words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 185–206). London: Psychology Press. Cited by1
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2016). Processing the written word. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 453–469). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2004). What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 923–941. Cited by5
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Davis, Colin J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Davis, C. J., & Bowers, S. J. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position encoding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 535–557. Cited by7
    • Davis, Colin J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
    • Davis, Colin J. (2012). The orthographic similarity of printed words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 185–206). London: Psychology Press.
    • Kinoshita, Sachiko. (2015). Visual word recognition in the Bayesian reader framework. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 63–75). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Ktori, Maria, & Pitchford, Nicola J. (2010). Letter position encoding across deep and transparent orthographies. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 69–85). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Norris, Dennis. (2013). Models of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.003
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 668–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.668 Cited by10
    • Andrews, Sally. (2012). Individual differences in skilled visual word recognition and reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 151–172). London: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, Colin J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2012). A parallel activation model with a sequential twist. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 52–69). London: Psychology Press.
    • Khateb, Asaid, Taha, Haitham Y., Elias, Inas, & Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2013). The effect of the internal orthographic connectivity of written Arabic words on the process of the visual recognition: A comparison between skilled and dyslexic readers [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.834244
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Ko, In Yeong. (2018). The time course of activation of semantic and orthographic information in morphological decomposition by Korean adults and developing readers. Frontiers in Communication, 3:51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00051
    • Nation, Kate, & Castles, Anne. (2017). Putting the learning into orthographic learning. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 147–168). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Perea, Manuel. (2015). Neighborhoods effects in visual word recognition and reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 76–87). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Rao, Chaitra, Vaid, Jyotsna, Srinivasan, Narayanan, & Chen, Hsin-Chin. (2011). Orthographic characteristics speed Hindi word naming but slow Urdu naming: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu biliterates [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9256-9
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Davis, C. J., Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: The role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1550–1570. Cited by7
    • Davis, Colin J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
    • Davis, Colin J. (2012). The orthographic similarity of printed words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 185–206). London: Psychology Press.
    • Norris, Dennis. (2013). Models of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.003
    • Perea, Manuel. (2015). Neighborhoods effects in visual word recognition and reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 76–87). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Taft, Marcus, Xu, Joe, & Li, Sonny. (2017). Letter coding in visual word recognition: The impact of embedded words. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.05.002
  • Davis, C. J., & Taft, M. (2005). More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 904–910. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196784 Cited by8
    • Beyersmann, Elisabeth, Kezilas, Yvette, Coltheart, Max, Castles, Anne, Ziegler, Johannes C., Taft, Marcus, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2018). Taking the book from the bookshelf: Masked constituent priming effects from compound words and nonwords. Journal of Cognition, 1(1): 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.11
    • Davis, Colin J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
    • Davis, Colin J. (2012). The orthographic similarity of printed words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 185–206). London: Psychology Press.
    • Norris, Dennis. (2013). Models of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.003
    • Perea, Manuel. (2015). Neighborhoods effects in visual word recognition and reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 76–87). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Taft, Marcus, Xu, Joe, & Li, Sonny. (2017). Letter coding in visual word recognition: The impact of embedded words. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.05.002
  • Davis, Dennis S., & Neitzel, Carin. (2012). Collaborative sense-making in print and digital text environments. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 831–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9302-2 Cited by1
    • Fesel, Sabine S., Segers, Eliane, de Leeuw, Linda, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2016). Strategy training and mind-mapping facilitates children's hypertext comprehension. Written Language & Literacy, 19(2), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.2.01fes
  • Davis, F. B. (1968). Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 499–545. Cited by3
    • Gibson, Eleanor J., & Levin, Harry. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Shebilske, Wayne L. (1980). Structuring an internal representation of text: A basis of literacy. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma, (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 227–239). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
  • Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. (2010). Form and meaning in early morphological processing: Comment on Feldman, O'Connor, and Moscoso del Prado Martín (2009). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 749–755. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.5.749 Cited by5
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, Milin, Petar, Cho, Kit W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, & O'Connor, Patrick A. (2015). Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00111
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Katherine. (2012). Morphological processing: A comparison of graded and categorical accounts. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–22). London: Psychology Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2019). EPS mid-career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819829696
    • Taft, Marcus. (2015). The nature of lexical representation in visual word recognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 99–113). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Balota, David A. (2015). Visual word recognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 26–43). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • de Abreu, Mônica Dourado, & Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia. (1998). Alphabetic access route in beginning reading acquisition in Portuguese: The role of letter-name knowledge. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 85–104. Cited by9
    • Cardoso-Martins, Claudia. (2006). Beginning reading acquisition in Brazilian Portuguese. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 171–187). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, Resenda, Selmara Mamede, & Rodrigues, Larissa Assunção. (2002). Letter name knowledge and the ability to learn to read by processing letter–phoneme relations in words: Evidence from Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 409–432.
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (2015). How children learn to read words. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 293–310). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Evans, Mary Ann, Bell, Michelle, Shaw, Deborah, Moretti, Shelley, & Page, Jodi. (2006). Letter names, letter sounds and phonological awareness: An examination of kindergarten children across letters and of letters across children. Reading and Writing, 19(9), 959–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9026-x
    • Foulin, Jean Noel. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2
    • Levin, Iris. (2010). The role of Hebrew letter names in early literacy: The case of multi-phonemic acrophonic names. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 55–81). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_5
    • Pollo, Tatiana Cury, Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2008). Three perspectives on spelling development. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 175–189). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • De Agostini, Maria, Kazandjian, Seta, Lellouch, Joseph, & Chokron, Sylvie. (2010). Visual aesthetic preference: Effects of handedness, sex, and age-related reading/writing directional scanning experience. Writing Systems Research, 2(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq006
  • de Beaugrande, R. (1984). Text production: Toward a science of composition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500011520 Cited by7
    • Antos, Gerd. (1996). Die Produktion schriftlicher Texte [The production of written texts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1527–1535). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Cislaru, Georgeta. (2015). Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface. In Georgeta Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface (pp. 1–17). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.01cis
    • De Manrique, Ana María Borzone, & Signorini, Angela. (1998). Emergent writing forms in Spanish. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(6), 499–517.
    • Donahue, Christiane, & Lillis, Theresa. (2014). Models of writing and text production. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 55–78). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Jakobs, Eva-Maria, & Perrin, Daniel. (2014b). Introduction: Theory and methodology in text production research. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 27–30). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Kellogg, Ronald T. (1994). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Molitor-Lübbert, Sylvie. (1996). Schreiben als mentaler und sprachlicher Prozeß [Writing as a mental and linguistic process]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1005–1027). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • de Beaugrande, Robert-Alain, & Dressler, Wolfgang U. (1981). Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen. Cited by5
    • Antos, Gerd. (1996). Die Produktion schriftlicher Texte [The production of written texts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1527–1535). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Brinker, Klaus. (1996). Die Konstitution schriftlicher Texte [The constitution of written texts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1515–1526). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Christmann, Ursula, & Groeben, Norbert. (1996). Die Rezeption schriftlicher Texte [The reception of written texts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1536–1545). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Koch, Peter, & Oesterreicher, Wulf. (1994). Schriftlichkeit und Sprache [Writing and language]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 587–604). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Linell, Per. (1982). The written language bias in linguistics (Studies in Comrnunication 2). Linköping: Linköping University.
  • De Cara, B., & Goswami, U. (2002). Similarity relations among spoken words: Evidence for the special status of rimes in English. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 34, 416–423. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195470 Cited by8
    • Bae, Sungbong, Pae, Hye K., & Yi, Kwangoh. (2018). Subunit priming effects on lexical decision in Korean: Both body and rime units are important in Korean. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 373–390). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2006). Orthography, phonology, and reading development: A cross-linguistics perspective. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 463–480). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2008). Phonological representations for reading acquisition across languages. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 65–84). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2009). The basic processes in reading: Insights from neuroscience. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 134–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2010). A psycholinguistic grain size view of reading acquisition across languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 23–42). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Kim, Young-Suk. (2009a). Crosslinguistic influence on phonological awareness for Korean–English bilingual children [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 843–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9132-z
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, Kogan, Nadya, & Walters, Joel. (2010). Universal and language-specific constraints on phonemic awareness: Evidence from Russian–Hebrew bilingual children. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9204-8
    • Thomson, Jennifer M., & Goswami, Usha. (2010). Learning novel phonological representations in developmental dyslexia: Associations with basic auditory processing of rise time and phonological awareness. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9167-9
  • De Cara, B., & Goswami, U. (2003). Phonological neighbourhood density: Effects in a rhyme awareness task in five-year-old children. Journal of Child Language, 30, 695–710. Cited by5
    • Goswami, Usha. (2006). Orthography, phonology, and reading development: A cross-linguistics perspective. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 463–480). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2008). Phonological representations for reading acquisition across languages. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 65–84). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2010). A psycholinguistic grain size view of reading acquisition across languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 23–42). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, Kogan, Nadya, & Walters, Joel. (2010). Universal and language-specific constraints on phonemic awareness: Evidence from Russian–Hebrew bilingual children. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9204-8
    • Thomson, Jennifer M., & Goswami, Usha. (2010). Learning novel phonological representations in developmental dyslexia: Associations with basic auditory processing of rise time and phonological awareness. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9167-9
  • de Casparis, J. G. (1975). Indonesian palaeography: A history of writing in Indonesia from the beginnings to c. A.D. 1500 (Handbuch der Orientalistik: Division 3, Volume 4, Part 1). Leiden: Brill. Cited by10
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Court, Christopher. (1996). The spread of Brahmi script into Southeast Asia. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 445–449). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Kuipers, Joel. (2003). Indic scripts of insular Southeast Asia: Changing structures and functions. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 241–262). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Kuipers, Joel C. & McDermott, Ray. (1996). Insular Southeast Asian scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 474–484). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Miller, Christopher Ray. (2014). Devanagari's descendants in North and South India, Indonesia and the Philippines [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.857288
  • de Castilla, Nuria. (2019). Uses and written practices in Aljamiado manuscripts. In Dmitry Bondarev, Alessandro Gori, & Lameen Souag (Eds.), Creating standards: Interactions with Arabic script in 12 manuscript cultures (Studies in Manuscript Cultures 16) (pp. 111–129). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110639063-005
  • de Graaff, S., Bosman, A. M. T., Hasselman, F., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Benefits of systematic phonics instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(4), 318–333. Cited by5
    • Perfetti, Charles, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2017). Epilogue: Universals and particulars in learning to read across seventeen orthographies. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 455–466). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (2017a). Learning to read Dutch. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 322–346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Dutch. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 73–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.004
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, & Perfetti, Charles. (2017). Introduction: Operating principles in learning to read. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Perfetti, Charles, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Introduction: Developmental dyslexia – A cross-linguistic perspective. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.001
  • de Groot, A. M. B. (1983). The range of automatic spreading activation in word priming. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 417–436. Cited by4
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Feldman, Laurie B. (1992). Morphological relationships revealed through the repetition priming task. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 239–254). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Jones, Lara L., & Estes, Zachary. (2012). Lexical priming: Associative, semantic, and thematic influences on word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 44–72). London: Psychology Press.
    • Taylor, M. Martin. (1988). The bilateral cooperative model of reading. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 322–361). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
  • de Groot, Annette M. B. (1992). Bilingual lexical representation: A closer look at conceptual representations. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 389–412). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. Cited by1
    • Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2006). Morpho-Phonemic similarity within and between languages: A factor to be considered in processing Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9009-y
  • de Groot, Annette, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Bos, Mieke, & van den Eijnden, Ellen. (2002). Lexical decision and word naming in bilinguals: Language effects and task effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 91–124. Cited by4
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Hellwig, Frauke M., & de Groot, Annette M. B. (2005). Onset entropy matters – Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3001-9
    • Macizo, Pedro, & Van Petten, Cyma. (2007). Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 295–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9032-z
    • Marian, Viorica. (2017). Orthographic and phonological neighborhood databases across multiple languages [Special issue: Orthographic databases and lexicons, edited by Lynne Cahill & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 20(1), 6–26. doi 10.1075/wll.20.1.02mar
  • de Groot, A. M. B., Thomassen, A. J. W. M., & Hudson, P. T. W. (1982). Associative facilitation of word recognition as measured from a neutral prime. Memory & Cognition, 10, 358–370. Cited by6
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • de Groot, Annette M. B. (1992). Bilingual lexical representation: A closer look at conceptual representations. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 389–412). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Jones, Lara L., & Estes, Zachary. (2012). Lexical priming: Associative, semantic, and thematic influences on word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 44–72). London: Psychology Press.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2004). Modeling the Japanese mental lexicon: Morphological, orthographic and phonological considerations. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in Psychological Research: Volume 31 (pp. 27–61). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Taylor, M. Martin. (1988). The bilateral cooperative model of reading. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 322–361). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
  • de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2002). Quality of book-reading matters for emergent readers: An experiment with the same book in a regular or electronic format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.145 Cited by5
    • Gong, Zhiyu, & Levy, Betty Ann. (2009). Four year old children's acquisition of print knowledge during electronic storybook reading. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 889–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9130-1
    • Karemaker, Arjette M., Pitchford, Nicola J., & O'Malley, Claire. (2010). Does whole-word multimedia software support literacy acquisition? Reading and Writing, 23(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9148-4
    • Kerr, Matthew A., & Symons, Sonya E. (2006). Computerized presentation of text: Effects on children's reading of informational material [Special issue: Reading comprehension - Part II]. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145–003-8128-y
    • Segal-Drori, Ora, Korat, Ofra, Shamir, Adina, & Klein, Pnina S. (2010). Reading electronic and printed books with and without adult instruction: Effects on emergent reading. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 913–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9182-x
    • Shamir, Adina, Korat, Ofra, & Fellah, Renat. (2012). Promoting vocabulary, phonological awareness and concept about print among children at risk for learning disability: Can e-books help? Reading and Writing, 25(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9245-z
  • de Jong, N. H., Feldman, L. B., Schreuder, R., Pastizzo, M. J., & Baayen, R. H. (2002). The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological, and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language, 81(1-3). 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2547. Cited by6
    • Dronjic, Vedran. (2011). Mandarin Chinese compounds, their representation, and processing in the visual modality [Special issue: Linguistic and cognitive factors in reading Chinese, edited by Xi Chen & Yang C. Luo]. Writing Systems Research, 3(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr005
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Basnight-Brown, Dana M. (2008). The role of morphology in visual word recognition: Graded semantic influences due to competing senses and semantic richness of the stem. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 85–106). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, Milin, Petar, Cho, Kit W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, & O'Connor, Patrick A. (2015). Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00111
    • Krott, Andrea, Hagoort, Peter, & Baayen, R. Harald. (2004). Sublexical units and supralexical combinatorics in the processing of interfixed Dutch compounds [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000251 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 124–139) Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Libben, Gary. (2006). Reading complex morphological structures. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 259–274). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina. (2018). English compounds and their spelling (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 329–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119625 Cited by8
    • Conrad, Markus, & Jacobs, Arthur M. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000224 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 44–64). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Basnight-Brown, Dana M. (2008). The role of morphology in visual word recognition: Graded semantic influences due to competing senses and semantic richness of the stem. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 85–106). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, Milin, Petar, Cho, Kit W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, & O'Connor, Patrick A. (2015). Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00111
    • Joyce, Terry, & Ohta, Nobuo. (2002). Constituent morpheme frequency data for two-kanji compound words. Tsukuba Psychological Research, 24, 111–141.
    • Krott, Andrea, Hagoort, Peter, & Baayen, R. Harald. (2004). Sublexical units and supralexical combinatorics in the processing of interfixed Dutch compounds [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000251 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 124–139) Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Neijt, Anneke, Baayen, Harald, & Schreuder, Robert. (2006). Formal and semantic constraints on the interpretation of the suffix -s in reading Dutch nominal compounds. Written Language & Literacy, 9(2), 247–264.
    • Perdijk, Kors, Schreuder, Robert, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2005). The role of morphological family size in word recognition: A developmental perspective [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 121–135.
    • Rispens, Judith E., McBride-Chang, Catherine, & Reitsma, Pieter. (2008). Morphological awareness and early and advanced word recognition and spelling in Dutch. Reading and Writing, 21(6), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9077-7
  • de Jong, P. F. (1998). Working memory deficits of reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 75–96. Cited by4
    • Bourke, Lorna, & Adams, Anne-Marie. (2010). Cognitive constraints and the early learning goals in writing [Special Issue:Writing development: Cognitive, sociocultural, linguistic perspectives, edited b Debra Myhill & Ros Fisher]. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01434.x
    • Mimran, R. Cohen. (2006). Reading disabilities among Hebrew-speaking children in upper elementary grades: The role of phonological and nonphonological language skills. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5461-3
    • Puranik, Cynthia S., Lomdardino, Linda J., & Altmann, Lori J. (2007). Writing through retellings: An exploratory study of language-impaired and dyslexic populations. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9030-1
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • de Jong, P. F., & Share, D. L. (2007). Orthographic learning during oral and silent reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430709336634 Cited by7
    • Arfé, Barbara. (2020). A mature science of reading and spelling. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 235–240). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_15
    • Bekebrede, Judith, van der Leij, Aryan, & Share, David L. (2009). Dutch dyslexic adolescents: Phonological-core variable-orthographic differences. Reading and Writing, 22(2), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9105-7
    • McClung, Nicola A., O'Donnell, Colleen R., & Cunningham, Anne E. (2012). Orthographic learning and the development of visual word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 173–195). London: Psychology Press.
    • Nation, Kate, & Castles, Anne. (2017). Putting the learning into orthographic learning. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 147–168). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Rosenthal, Julie, & Ehri, Linnea C. (2011). Pronouncing new words aloud during the silent reading of text enhances fifth graders' memory for vocabulary words and their spellings. Reading and Writing, 24(8), 921–950. doi10.1007/s11145-010-9239-x
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.450 Cited by29
    • Aram, Dorit. (2006). Early literacy interventions: The relative roles of storybook reading, alphabetic activities, and their combination. Reading and Writing, 19(5), 489–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9005-2
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Babayiğit, Selma, & Stainthorp, Rhona. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y
    • Bekebrede, Judith, van der Leij, Aryan, & Share, David L. (2009). Dutch dyslexic adolescents: Phonological-core variable-orthographic differences. Reading and Writing, 22(2), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9105-7
    • Caravolas, Markéta, & Samara, Anna. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 326–343). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Cho, Jeung-Ryeul. (2018). Cognitive-linguistic skills and reading and writing in Korean Hangul, Chinese Hanja, and English among Korean children. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 391–410). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Elbro, Carsten, & de Jong, Peter F. (2017). Orthographic learning is verbal learning: The role of spelling pronunciations. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 169–189). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Evans, Mary Ann, Bell, Michelle, Shaw, Deborah, Moretti, Shelley, & Page, Jodi. (2006). Letter names, letter sounds and phonological awareness: An examination of kindergarten children across letters and of letters across children. Reading and Writing, 19(9), 959–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9026-x
    • Georgiou, George K., Parrila, Rauno, & Liao, Chen-Huei. (2008). Rapid naming speed and reading across languages that vary in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 21(9), 885–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9096-4
    • Georgiou, George K, Torppa, Minna, Manolitsis, George, Lyytinen, Heikki, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of reading and spelling across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9271-x
    • Hintikka, Sini, Aro, Mikko, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2005). Computerized training of the correspondences between phonological and orthographic units [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 155–178.
    • Kim, Young-Suk. (2009b). The foundation of literacy skills in Korean: The relationship between letter-name knowledge and phonological awareness and their relative contribution to literacy skills. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 907–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9131-0
    • Kim, Young-Suk, & Pallante, Daniel. (2012). Predictors of reading skills for kindergartners and first grade students in Spanish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9244-0
    • Levin, Iris. (2010). The role of Hebrew letter names in early literacy: The case of multi-phonemic acrophonic names. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 55–81). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_5
    • Liao, Chen-Huei, Georgiou, George K., & Parrila, Rauno. (2008). Rapid naming speed and Chinese character recognition. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9071-0
    • Liu, Duo, & Zhu, Xiaoqin. (2016). The associations of phonological awareness, morphological awareness, orthographic awareness and RAN with Hong Kong Chinese children's literacy performance at word level. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218747
    • Messbauer, Vera C. S., & de Jong, Peter F. (2006). Effects of visual and phonological distinctness on visual-verbal paired associate learning in Dutch dyslexic and normal readers. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 393–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5121-7
    • Morfidi, Eleni, van der Leij, Aryan, de Jong, Peter F., Scheltinga, Femke, & Bekebrede, Judith. (2007). Reading in two orthographies: A cross-linguistic study of Dutch average and poor readers who learn English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 753–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9035-9
    • Müller, Kurt, & Brady, Susan. (2001). Correlates of early reading performance in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 757–799.
    • Nakamoto, Jonathan, Lindsey, Kim A., & Manis, Franklin R. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of English language learners' word decoding and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 20(7), 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9045-7
    • Nergård-Nilssen, T. (2006). Word-decoding deficits in Norwegian: The impact of psycholinguistic marker effects. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5468-9
    • Ramirez, Gloria, Chen, Xi, Geva, Esther, & Kiefer, Heidi. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3180-4
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (2017a). Learning to read Dutch. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 322–346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Dutch. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 73–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.004
    • Wauters, Loes N., Van Bon, Wim H. J., & Tellings, Agnes E. J. M. (2006). Reading comprehension of Dutch deaf children [Special issue: Reading comprehension - Part II]. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5894-0
  • de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(1), 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0601_03 Cited by25
    • Albuquerque, Cristina P. (2012). Rapid naming contributions to reading and writing acquisition of European Portuguese. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 775–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9299-6
    • Betjemann, Rebecca S., Willcutt, Erik G., Olson, Richard K., Keenan, Janice M., DeFries, John C., & Wadsworth, Sally J. (2008). Word reading and reading comprehension: stability, overlap and independence. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9076-8
    • Cain, Kate, & Barnes, Marcia A. (2017). Reading comprehension: What develops and when? In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 257–281). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Cain, Kate, Compton, Donald L., & Parrila, Rauno K. (2017c). Introduction to reading comprehension. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 237–238). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Candan, Ecehan, Babür, Nalan, Haznedar, Belma, & Erçetin , Gülcan. (2020). Reading and spelling skills in transparent orthographies: Phonological encoding and rapid automatized naming in Turkish. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 185–201). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_12
    • Caravolas, Markéta, & Samara, Anna. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 326–343). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Catts, Hugh W. (2017). Early identification of reading disabilities. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 311–331). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Conners, Frances A. (2009). Attentional control and the Simple View of reading. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9126-x
    • Georgiou, George K, Torppa, Minna, Manolitsis, George, Lyytinen, Heikki, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of reading and spelling across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9271-x
    • Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2010). Role of orthography in literacy acquisition and literacy problems among monolinguals and bilinguals. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 167–176). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_12
    • Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2016). Writing and spelling development: Impact of Liliana Tolchinsky's research over 30 years. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 17–28). Cham: Springer.
    • Landerl, Karin. (2006). Reading acquisition in different orthographies: Evidence from direct comparisons. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 513–530). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Landerl, Karin. (2019). Behavioral precursors of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.011
    • Little, Callie W., Wang, Frances, & Hart, Sara A. (2016). Behavioral and molecular genetic influences on reading-related outcomes. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 14–32). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Liu, Duo, & Zhu, Xiaoqin. (2016). The associations of phonological awareness, morphological awareness, orthographic awareness and RAN with Hong Kong Chinese children's literacy performance at word level. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218747
    • Oakhill, Jane V., Berenhaus, Molly S., & Cain, Kate. (2015). Children's reading comprehension and comprehension difficulties. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 344–360). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Oakhill, Jane, & Cain, Kate. (2017). Children with specific text comprehension problems. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 359–375). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Seigneuric, Alix, & Ehrlich, Marie-France. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children's reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 617–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sun-Alperin, M. Kendra, & Wang, Min. (2011). Cross-language transfer of phonological and orthographic processing skills from Spanish L1 to English L2. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9221-7
    • Vaughn, Sharon, & Hall, Colby. (2017). Theoretically guided interventions for adolescents who are poor readers. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 489–506). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Reitsma, Pieter, & Siegel, Linda S. (2011). Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9232-4
    • Wagner, Richard K., Piasta, Shayne B., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (2006). Learning to read. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 1111–1142). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Yuan, Han, Segers, Eliane, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2020). Factors affecting L2 phonological awareness in Chinese-Dutch preschoolers. Written Language & Literacy, 23(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00035.yua
  • de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.22 Cited by23
    • Abu Ahmad, Hanadi, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Share, David L. (2014). Cognitive predictors of early reading ability in Arabic: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to grade 2. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 171–194). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Ahmed, Yusra, Wagner, Richard K., & Kantor, Patricia Thatcher. (2012). How visual word recognition is affected by developmental dyslexia. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 196–215). London: Psychology Press.
    • Bekebrede, Judith, van der Leij, Aryan, & Share, David L. (2009). Dutch dyslexic adolescents: Phonological-core variable-orthographic differences. Reading and Writing, 22(2), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9105-7
    • Brunswick, Nicola. (2010). Unimpaired reading development and dyslexia across different languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 131–154). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Chung, Kevin K. H., Ho, Connie S.-H., Chan, David W., Tsang, Suk-Man, & Lee, Suk-Han. (2011). Cognitive skills and literacy performance of Chinese adolescents with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 835–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9227-1
    • Duncan, Lynne G., Castro, São Luís, Defior, Sylvia, Seymour, Philip H. K., Baillie, Sheila, Leybaert, Jacqueline, Mousty, Philippe, Genard, Nathalie, Sarris, Menelaos, Porpodas, Costas D., Lund, Rannveig, Sigurðsson, Baldur, Þráinsdóttir, Anna S., Sucena, Ana, & Serrano, Francisca. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009
    • Elbro, Carsten, & de Jong, Peter F. (2017). Orthographic learning is verbal learning: The role of spelling pronunciations. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 169–189). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Hintikka, Sini, Aro, Mikko, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2005). Computerized training of the correspondences between phonological and orthographic units [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 155–178.
    • Jiménez, Juan E., García, Eduardo, & Venegas, Enrique. (2010). Are phonological processes the same or different in low literacy adults and children with or without reading disabilities? Reading and Writing, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9146-6
    • Landerl, Karin, & Thaler, Verena. (2006). Reading and spelling acquisition and dyslexia in German. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 121–134). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Messbauer, Vera C. S., & de Jong, Peter F. (2006). Effects of visual and phonological distinctness on visual-verbal paired associate learning in Dutch dyslexic and normal readers. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 393–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5121-7
    • Morfidi, Eleni, van der Leij, Aryan, de Jong, Peter F., Scheltinga, Femke, & Bekebrede, Judith. (2007). Reading in two orthographies: A cross-linguistic study of Dutch average and poor readers who learn English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 753–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9035-9
    • Nag, Sonali, & Snowling, Margaret J. (2011a). Cognitive profiles of poor readers of Kannada [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9258-7
    • Ramirez, Gloria, Chen, Xi, Geva, Esther, & Kiefer, Heidi. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9
    • Rispens, Judith E., McBride-Chang, Catherine, & Reitsma, Pieter. (2008). Morphological awareness and early and advanced word recognition and spelling in Dutch. Reading and Writing, 21(6), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9077-7
    • Russak, Susie, amp; Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2011). Phonological awareness in Hebrew (L1) and English (L2) in normal and disabled readers [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9235-1
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Steenbeek-Planting, Esther G., van Bon, Wim H. J., & Schreuder, Robert. (2017). Instability of word reading errors of typical and poor readers. Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00002.ste
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (2017a). Learning to read Dutch. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 322–346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Dutch. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 73–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.004
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Reitsma, Pieter, & Siegel, Linda S. (2011). Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9232-4
    • Wijayathilake. M. A. D. K., & Parrila. R. (2014). Predictors of word reading skills in good and struggling readers in Sinhala [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.846844
  • De Jonge, S., & Kemp, N. (2012). Text-message abbreviations and language skills in high school and university students. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01466.x Cited by5
    • Grace, Abbie, & Kemp, Nenagh. (2015). Text messaging language: A comparison of undergraduates' naturalistic textism use in four consecutive cohorts. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.898575
    • Grace, Abbie, Kemp, Nenagh, Martin, Frances Heritage, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Undergraduates' use of text messaging language: Effects of country and collection method [Special issue: The writing system at play, edited by Vivian Cook, Benedetta Bassetti, & Jyotsna Vaid]. Writing Systems Research, 4, 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.712875
    • Kemp, Nenagh, & Grace, Abbie. (2017). Txting across time: Undergraduates' use of ‘textese’ in seven consecutive first-year psychology cohorts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1285220
    • Verheijen, Lieke. (2018). Orthographic principles in computer-mediated communication: The SUPER-functions of textisms and their interaction with age and medium [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 111–145. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00012.ver
    • Wood, Clare, Kemp, Nenagh, & Plester, Beverley. (2013). Text messaging and literacy - The evidence (Routledge Psychology in Education). London; New York: Routledge.
  • de Kerckhove, D. (1984). Effets cognitifs de l'alphabet. In D. de Kerckhove & D. Jutras (Eds.), Pour comprendre 1984 (Occasional Paper 49) (pp. 112–129). Ottawa: UNESCO. Cited by4
    • Bhatt, Prath M. (1988). Graphic systems, phonic systems, and linguistic representations. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 106–120). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • de Kerckhove, Derrick. (1988a). Logical principles underlying the layout of Greek orthography. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 153–172). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • de Kerckhove, Derrick. (1988b). Critical brain processes involved in deciphering the Greek alphabet. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 401–421). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Jurdant, Baudouin. (1988). The role of vowels in alphabetic writing. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 381–400). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
  • de Kerckhove, Derrick. (1988a). Logical principles underlying the layout of Greek orthography. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 153–172). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer. Cited by2
    • Elvira Astoreca, Natalia. (2021a). Early Greek alphabetic writing: A linguistic approach (Contexts of and Relations Between Early Writing Systems 5). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Saenger, Paul. (1997). Space between words: The origins of silent reading (Figurae: Reading Medieval Culture). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • de Kerckhove, Derrick. (1988b). Critical brain processes involved in deciphering the Greek alphabet. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 401–421). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer. Cited by2
    • Brekle, Herbert E. (1994b). Die Buchstabenformen westlicher Alphabetschriften in ihrer historischen Entwicklung [The development of letter forms in western alphabets]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 171–204). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110111293.1.2.171
    • Saenger, Paul. (1997). Space between words: The origins of silent reading (Figurae: Reading Medieval Culture). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • de Kerckhove, Derrick, & Lumsden, Charles J. (1988). General introduction. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 1–14). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
  • de Kerckhove, Derrick, & Lumsden, Charles J. (Eds.). (1988). The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer. Cited by10
    • Brekle, Herbert E. (1994b). Die Buchstabenformen westlicher Alphabetschriften in ihrer historischen Entwicklung [The development of letter forms in western alphabets]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 171–204). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110111293.1.2.171
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    • Hannas, William C. (2003). The writing on the wall: How Asian orthography curbs creativity (Encounters with Asia). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Mignolo, Walter D. (1994a). Signs and their transmission: The question of the book in the New World. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 220–270). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Saenger, Paul. (1997). Space between words: The origins of silent reading (Figurae: Reading Medieval Culture). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    • Sirat, Colette. (1994). Handwriting and the writing hand. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 375–460). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2010). Language, technology, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1995). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.3 [2014, Revised edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14)]
    • Watt, W. C. (1994a). Foreword. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. vii-xiii). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Watt, W. C. (1994d). Curves as angles. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 215–246). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • De Luca, M., Borrelli, M., Judica, A., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2002). Reading words and pseudowords: An eye movement study of developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 80, 617–626. Cited by11
    • Burani, Cristina, Thornton, Anna M., & and Zoccolotti, Pierluigi. (2017). Learning to read Italian. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 211–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Job, Remo, Peressotti, Francesca, & Mulatti, Claudio. (2006). The acquisition of literacy in Italian. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 105–119). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Marinelli, Chiara Valeria, Angelelli, Paola, Notarnicola, Alessandra, & Luzzatti, Claudio. (2009). Do Italian dyslexic children use the lexical reading route efficiently? An orthographic judgment task. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9118-x
    • Mishra, Ramesh Kumar. (2019). Cross-modal processing of orthography-phonology interface in Hindi-English bilinguals. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 353–371). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_18
    • Orsolini, Margherita, Fanari, Rachele, Cerracchio, Sara, & Famiglietti, Luisa. (2009). Phonological and lexical reading in Italian children with dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 933–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9134-x
    • Paizi, Despina, Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, & Burani, Cristina. (2010). Lexical reading in Italian developmental dyslexic readers. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 181–198). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Paizi, Despina, Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, & Burani, Cristina. (2011). Lexical stress assignment in Italian developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9236-0
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Su, Yi-Fen, & Samuels, S. Jay. (2010). Developmental changes in character-complexity and word-length effects when reading Chinese script. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1085–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9197-3
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, De Luca, Maria, Di Filippo, Gloria, Judica, Anna, & Martelli, Marialuisa. (2009). Reading development in an orthographically regular language: effects of length, frequency, lexicality and global processing ability. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1053–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9144-8
  • De Luca, M., Di Pace, M., Judica, A., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (1999). Eye movement patterns in linguistic and non-linguistic tasks in developmental surface dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1407–1420. Cited by10
    • Burani, Cristina, Thornton, Anna M., & and Zoccolotti, Pierluigi. (2017). Learning to read Italian. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 211–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Job, Remo, Peressotti, Francesca, & Mulatti, Claudio. (2006). The acquisition of literacy in Italian. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 105–119). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Marinelli, Chiara Valeria, Angelelli, Paola, Notarnicola, Alessandra, & Luzzatti, Claudio. (2009). Do Italian dyslexic children use the lexical reading route efficiently? An orthographic judgment task. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9118-x
    • Orsolini, Margherita, Fanari, Rachele, Cerracchio, Sara, & Famiglietti, Luisa. (2009). Phonological and lexical reading in Italian children with dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 933–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9134-x
    • Paizi, Despina, Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, & Burani, Cristina. (2010). Lexical reading in Italian developmental dyslexic readers. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 181–198). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Paizi, Despina, Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, & Burani, Cristina. (2011). Lexical stress assignment in Italian developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9236-0
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Su, Yi-Fen, & Samuels, S. Jay. (2010). Developmental changes in character-complexity and word-length effects when reading Chinese script. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1085–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9197-3
    • Valdois, Sylviane, Bosse, Marie-Line, Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., Zorman, Michel, David, D., & Pellat, Jacques. (2003). Phonological and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from two case studies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(6), 541–572.
    • Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, De Luca, Maria, Di Filippo, Gloria, Judica, Anna, & Martelli, Marialuisa. (2009). Reading development in an orthographically regular language: effects of length, frequency, lexicality and global processing ability. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1053–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9144-8
  • De Manrique, Ana María Borzone, & Signorini, Angela. (1998). Emergent writing forms in Spanish. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(6), 499–517. Cited by2
    • Defior, Sylvia, & Serrano, Francisca. (2005). The initial development of spelling in Spanish: From global to analytical. Reading and Writing, 18(1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5893-1
    • Goikietxea, Edurne. (2005). Levels of phonological awareness in preliterate and literate Spanish-speaking children. Reading and Writing, 18(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-1955-7
  • de Mecquenem, Roland. (1949). Epigraphie proto-élamite (Mission de la Délégation en Perse 31). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Cited by3
    • Englund, Robert K. (1996). The Proto-Elamite script. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 160–164). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Vallat, François. (1986). The most ancient scripts of Iran: The current situation. World Archaeology, 17(3), 335–347.
  • De Moor, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2000). Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths. Psychological Research / Psychologische Forschung, 63, 159–162. Cited by6
    • Davis, Colin J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Perea, Manuel. (2015). Neighborhoods effects in visual word recognition and reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 76–87). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Rao, Chaitra, Vaid, Jyotsna, Srinivasan, Narayanan, & Chen, Hsin-Chin. (2011). Orthographic characteristics speed Hindi word naming but slow Urdu naming: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu biliterates [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9256-9
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Snell, Joshua, Vitu, Françoise, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2017). Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: Beyond the sub-lexical level? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(10), 1984–1996. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1217247
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • De Roberto, Elisa. (2019). Inscriptions in Italian literature. In Ricarda Wagner, Christine Neufeld, Ludger Lieb (Eds.), Writing beyond pen and parchment: Inscribed objects in medieval European literature (Materiale Textkulturen 30) (pp. 109–140). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515_9783110645446-006
  • de Sahagún, B. (1950-1982). Florentine Codex: The general history of the things of new Spain (translated by C. E. Dibble & A. J. O. Anderson) (12 books in 13 volumes). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research and the University of Utah. Cited by13
    • Boone, Elizabeth Hill. (1994b). Aztec pictorial histories: Records without words. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 50–76). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Boone, Elizabeth Hill. (2008). The death of Mexican pictography. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 253–284). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Dehouve, Danièle. (2019). The “law of the series”: A proposal for the decipherment of Aztec ritual language [translation by Jerome A. Offner]. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 95–122). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c003
    • Hamann, Byron. (2004). Seeing and the Mixtec screenfolds. Visible Language, 38(1), 67–124.
    • Houston, Stephen. (1994). Literacy among the Pre-Columbian Maya: A comparative perspective. In Elizabeth H. Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 27–49). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Mignolo, Walter D. (1994a). Signs and their transmission: The question of the book in the New World. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 220–270). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Mikulska, Katarzyna. (2019b). The system of graphic communication in the Central Mexican divinatory codices from the functional perspective [translation by Jerome A. Offner]. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 41–92). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c002
    • Oudijk, Michel R. (2019). The aaking of academic myth. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 340–375). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c013
    • Pohl, John M. D. (1994). Mexican codices, maps, and lienzos as social contracts. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 137–160). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Szoblik, Katarzyna. (2019). Traces of orality in the Codex Xolotl. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 204–229). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c007
    • Terraciano, Kevin. (2010). Three texts in one: Book XII of the Florentine Codex [Special issue: Graphic pluralism: Native American systems of inscription and the colonial situation, edited by Frank Salomon & Sabine Hyland]. Ethnohistory, 57(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-2009-053
    • Vauzelle, Loïc. (2019). Clothes with metaphorical names and the representation of metaphors in the costumes of the Aztec gods. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 154–179). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c005
  • de Saussure, Ferdinand. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale (Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, in collaboration with Albert Reidlinger). Paris: Payot. [1922, Second edition; 1959, Course in general linguistics (Edited by Wade Baskin). New York: Philosophical Library; 1966, Reprint, New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967, (Édition critique préparée par Tullio de Mauro). Paris: Payot; 1878, Third edition; 1983, Course in general linguistics (Translated by Roy Harris). London: Duckworth; 1986; Reprint, La Salle, IL: Open Court] Cited by56
    • Ashworth, Evan. (2013). Language and ideologies and orthographies: Developing a writing system for Than Ówîngeh. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New Mexico.
    • Berg, Kristian. (2016). Graphemic analysis and the spoken language bias. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00388
    • Berg, Kristian, Buchmann, Franziska, Dybiec, Katharina, & Fuhrhop, Nanna. (2014). Morphological spellings in English [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 282–307. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.05ber
    • Bergerhausen, Johannes, & Huot-Marchand, Thomas. (2021). The missing scripts project. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 439–454). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-huot
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Castro, São Luís, & Cary, Luz. (2003). Introduction [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 1–3.
    • Cook, Vivian. (2004). The English writing system. (The English Language series). London Hodder Arnold. [2014, reprinted, London: New York: Routledge]
    • Cook, Vivian. (2016). Background to the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 5–23). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2018). Revisiting the ‘tyranny of writing’. In Constanze Weth & Kasper Juffermans (Eds.), Tyranny of writing: Ideologies of the written word (Bloomsbury advances in sociolinguistics) (pp. 19–29). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    • Danesi, Marcel. (2017). The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet (Bloomsbury Advances in Semiotics). London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Donahue, Christiane, & Lillis, Theresa. (2014). Models of writing and text production. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 55–78). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Ehlich, Konrad. (1983). Development of writing as social problem solving. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 99–129). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Erfurt, Jürgen. (1996). Sprachwandel und Schriftlichkeit [Language change and writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1387–1404). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Goody, Jack. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind (Themes in the Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goody, Jack. (1987). The interface between the written and oral (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Hagège, Claude. (1988). Writing: The invention and the dream. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 72–83). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2011). The relation of orthographic units to linguistic units in the Japanese writing system: An analysis of kanji, kana and kanji-okurigana writing. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Tsukuba, Japan.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2019). What do kanji graphs represent in the current Japanese writing system? Towards a unified model of kanji as written signs. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 185–208). Brest: Fluxus Editions. http://www.fluxus-editions.fr/gla1-hond.pdf
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2021). A modular theoretic approach to the Japanese writing system: Possibilities and challenges. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 621–643). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-hond
    • Johnson, Sally. (2005). Spelling trouble? Language, ideology and the reform of German orthography. Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.1017/s004740450707025x
    • Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2016). Writing and spelling development: Impact of Liliana Tolchinsky's research over 30 years. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 17–28). Cham: Springer.
    • Kohrt, Manfred. (1986). The term ‘grapheme’ in the history and theory of linguistics. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphemics and orthography (pp. 80–96). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867329.80
    • Lillis, Theresa. (2013). The sociolinguistics of writing (Edinburgh Sociolinguistics). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    • Linell, Per. (1982). The written language bias in linguistics (Studies in Comrnunication 2). Linköping: Linköping University.
    • Linell, Per. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations (Routledge Advances in Communication and Linguistic Theory). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • McDonald, Edward. (2016). The “ideograph” and the 漢字 hànzì: A cross-cultural concept with two mutually invisible faces. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 13(2), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.00016.mcd
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Mikulska, Katarzyna. (2019a). Introduction: Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach [translation by Jerome A. Offner]. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 3–22). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c000b
    • Neef, Martin. (2015). Writing systems as modular objects: Proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics, 1, 708–721. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2015-0026
    • Olson, David R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678466
    • Olson, David R., & Oatley, Keith. (2014). The quotation theory of writing. Written Communication, 31(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515164
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
    • Pae, Hye K. (2018a). Written languages, East-Asian scripts, and cross-linguistic influences: An introduction. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Presutti, Stefano. (2021a). The interdependence between speech and writing. Towards a greater awareness. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 83–101). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-prea
    • Roberts, David. (2010a). Exploring written ambiguities can help assess where to mark tone. Writing Systems Research, 2(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq003
    • Roberts, David, & Joyce, Terry. (2012). Introduction to special issue on ‘Units of Language – Units of Writing’: A key relationship for writing systems research [Special issue: Units of language – units of writing, edited by Terry Joyce & David Roberts]. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.2.01rob
    • Roca, Iggy. (2016). Phonology and English spelling. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 65–91). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Ryan, Des. (2016b). Linguists' descriptions of the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 41–64). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Ryan, Des. (2017). Principles of English spelling formation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Trinity College Dublin, Dublin.
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2016b). Writing systems: Methods for recording language. In Keith Allan (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics (pp. 47–61). London; New York, NY: Routledge.
    • Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina. (2018). English compounds and their spelling (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Schaper, Joachim. (2015). Hebrew culture at the “interface between the written and the oral”. In Brian B. Schmidt (Ed.), Contextualizing Israel's sacred writing: Ancient literacy, orality, and literary production (Ancient Israel and Its Literature 22) (pp. 323–340). Atlanta, GA: SBL Press.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Vachek, Josef. (1973). Written language: General problems and problems of English (Janua Linguarum, Series Critica 14). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Vachek, Josef. (1989b). Written language revisited (Selected, edited and introduced by Philip A. Luelsdorff). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Venezky, Richard L. (1970c). The structure of English orthography (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor 82). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Weth, Constanze, & Bunčić, Daniel. (2020). Foreign schriftdenken in ausbau languages: Luxembourgish and Rusyn orthographies in multiple language contact [Special issue: Literacies in contact, edited by Constanze Weth & Manuela Böhm, in collaboration Daniel Bunčić]. Written Language & Literacy, 23(2), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00045.wet
    • Weth, Constanze, & Juffermans, Kasper. (2018b). Introduction: The tyranny of writing in language and society. In Constanze Weth & Kasper Juffermans (Eds.), Tyranny of writing: Ideologies of the written word (Bloomsbury Advances in Sociolinguistics) (pp. 1–17). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • de Saussure, Ferdinand. (1922). Cours de linguistique générale (Second edition) (Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, in collaboration with Albert Reidlinger). Paris: Payot. [1916, First edition; 1959, Course in general linguistics (Edited by Wade Baskin). New York: Philosophical Library; 1966, Reprint, New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967, (Édition critique préparée par Tullio de Mauro). Paris: Payot; 1978, Third edition; 1983, Course in general linguistics (Translated by Roy Harris). London: Duckworth; 1986; Reprint, La Salle, IL: Open Court] Cited by8
    • Bennet, John. (2013). Epilogue. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 335–342). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.q
    • Bloomfield, Leonard. (1933). Language. New York; Chicago; San Francisco; Toronto: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [1935, 1950, 1962, London: Allen & Unwin; 1984, Chicago: University of Chicago Press]
    • Harris, Roy. (1994). Semiotic aspects of writing. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 41–48). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Harris, Roy. (2000). Rethinking writing. London; New York: Continuum.
    • Harris, Roy. (2009). Speech and writing. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 46–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609664.004
    • Powell, Barry B. (2009). Writing: Theory and history of the technology of civilization. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Vachek, Josef. (1989b). Written language revisited (Selected, edited and introduced by Philip A. Luelsdorff). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • de Saussure, Ferdinand. (1959). Course in general linguistics (Edited by Wade Baskin). New York: Philosophical Library. [1916, Cours de linguistique générale (Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, in collaboration with Albert Reidlinger). Paris: Payot; 1922, Second edition; 1966, Reprint, New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967, (Édition critique préparée par Tullio de Mauro). Paris: Payot; 1978, Third edition; 1983, Course in general linguistics (Translated by Roy Harris). London: Duckworth; 1986; Reprint, La Salle, IL: Open Court] Cited by31
    • Aronoff, Mark. (1992). Segmentalism in linguistics: The alphabetic basis of phonological theory. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 71-82). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Berg, Kristian. (2016). Graphemic analysis and the spoken language bias. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00388
    • Berg, Kristian, Buchmann, Franziska, Dybiec, Katharina, & Fuhrhop, Nanna. (2014). Morphological spellings in English [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 282–307. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.05ber
    • Cook, Vivian. (2004). The English writing system. (The English Language series). London Hodder Arnold. [2014, reprinted, London: New York: Routledge]
    • Cook, Vivian. (2016). Background to the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 5–23). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2009). Evaluating merit–the evolution of writing reconsidered. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp001
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2018). Revisiting the ‘tyranny of writing’. In Constanze Weth & Kasper Juffermans (Eds.), Tyranny of writing: Ideologies of the written word (Bloomsbury advances in sociolinguistics) (pp. 19–29). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Davidson, Andrew. (2019). Writing: The re-construction of language. Language Sciences, 72, 134–149. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.09.004
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Elti di Rodeano, Sveva. (2019). Digraphia: The story of a sociolinguistic typology. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 111–126). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-elti
    • Englehardt, Joshua (Ed.). (2012). Agency in ancient writing. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
    • Evertz, Martin. (2018). Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441
    • Faber, Alice. (1992). Phonemic segmentation as epiphenomenon: Evidence from the history of alphabetic writing. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 111–134). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Goody, Jack. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind (Themes in the Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goody, Jack. (1987). The interface between the written and oral (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Habib, Sandy, & Kurzon, Dennis. (2008). The systematization and typology of the instant messaging writing system used by young Israeli Arabs. Written Language & Literacy, 11(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.1.04hab
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Johnson, Sally. (2005). Spelling trouble? Language, ideology and the reform of German orthography. Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.1017/s004740450707025x
    • Lillis, Theresa. (2013). The sociolinguistics of writing (Edinburgh Sociolinguistics). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    • McDonald, Edward. (2016). The “ideograph” and the 漢字 hànzì: A cross-cultural concept with two mutually invisible faces. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 13(2), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.00016.mcd
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
    • Robinson, Andrew. (1995). The story of writing: Alphabets, hieroglyphs & pictograms. London: Thames & Hudson. [2007, Revised edition]
    • Ryan, Des. (2017). Principles of English spelling formation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Trinity College Dublin, Dublin.
    • Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina. (2018). English compounds and their spelling (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Shockey, Nathan. (2019). The typographic imagination: Reading and writing in Japan's age of modern print media (Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute). New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Unger, J. Marshall, & DeFrancis, John. (1995). Logographic and semasiographic writing systems: A critique of Sampson's classification. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 45–58). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Venezky, Richard L. (1970c). The structure of English orthography (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor 82). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
  • de Saussure, Ferdinand. (1966). Course in general linguistics (Reprint) (Edited by Wade Baskin). New York: McGraw-Hill. [1916, Cours de linguistique générale (Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, in collaboration with Albert Reidlinger). Paris: Payot; 1922, Second edition; 1959, Course in general linguistics (Edited by Wade Baskin). New York: Philosophical Library; 1967, (Édition critique préparée par Tullio de Mauro). Paris: Payot; 1978, Third edition; 1983, Course in general linguistics (Translated by Roy Harris). London: Duckworth; 1986; Reprint, La Salle, IL: Open Court] Cited by7
    • Bodel, John, & Houston, Stephen (Eds.). (2021). The hidden language of graphic signs: Cryptic writing and meaningful marks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886505
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Gu, Ming Dong. (2000). Reconceptualizing the linguistic divide: Chinese and Western theories of the written sign. Comparative Literature Studies, 37(2), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1353/cls.2000.0012
    • Pae, Hye K. (2018a). Written languages, East-Asian scripts, and cross-linguistic influences: An introduction. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2019). EPS mid-career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819829696
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
  • de Saussure, Ferdinand. (1967). Cours de linguistique générale. (Édition critique préparée par Tullio de Mauro). Paris: Payot. [1916, Cours de linguistique générale (Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, in collaboration with Albert Reidlinger). Paris: Payot; 1922, Second edition; 1959, Course in general linguistics (Edited by Wade Baskin). New York: Philosophical Library; 1978, Third edition; 1983, Course in general linguistics (Translated by Roy Harris). London: Duckworth; 1986; Reprint, La Salle, IL: Open Court] Cited by15
    • Brandt, Carmen, & Sohoni, Pushkar. (2018). Script and identity – the politics of writing in South Asia: An introduction [Special issue: Script and identity - The politics of writing in South Asia, edited by Carmen Brandt & Pushkar Sohoni]. South Asian History and Culture, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2017.1411048
    • Castro, São Luís, & Cary, Luz. (2003). Introduction [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 1–3.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996b). Typology of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1380–1387). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Donahue, Christiane, & Lillis, Theresa. (2014). Models of writing and text production. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 55–78). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Erfurt, Jürgen. (1996). Sprachwandel und Schriftlichkeit [Language change and writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1387–1404). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Hagège, Claude. (1988). Writing: The invention and the dream. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 72–83). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Jurdant, Baudouin. (1988). The role of vowels in alphabetic writing. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 381–400). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. (2000). Sejong's theory of literacy and writing [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin w. Kim, Elmer H., Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 13–45.
    • Kohrt, Manfred. (1986). The term ‘grapheme’ in the history and theory of linguistics. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphemics and orthography (pp. 80–96). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867329.80
    • Linell, Per. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations (Routledge Advances in Communication and Linguistic Theory). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Vachek, Josef. (1989b). Written language revisited (Selected, edited and introduced by Philip A. Luelsdorff). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Weth, Constanze, & Bunčić, Daniel. (2020). Foreign schriftdenken in ausbau languages: Luxembourgish and Rusyn orthographies in multiple language contact [Special issue: Literacies in contact, edited by Constanze Weth & Manuela Böhm, in collaboration Daniel Bunčić]. Written Language & Literacy, 23(2), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00045.wet
  • de Saussure, Ferdinand. (1978). Cours de linguistique générale (Third edition) (Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, in collaboration with Albert Reidlinger). Paris: Payot. [1916, First edition; 1922, Second edition; 1959, Course in general linguistics (Edited by Wade Baskin). New York: Philosophical Library; 1966, Reprint, New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967, (Édition critique préparée par Tullio de Mauro). Paris: Payot; 1983, Course in general linguistics (Translated by Roy Harris). London: Duckworth; 1986; Reprint, La Salle, IL: Open Court] Cited by5
    • Bachner, Andrea. (2014). Beyond Sinology: Chinese writing and the scripts of culture (Global Chinese Culture). New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Ehlich, Konrad. (1983). Development of writing as social problem solving. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 99–129). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Roca, Iggy. (2016). Phonology and English spelling. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 65–91). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Ryan, Des. (2016b). Linguists' descriptions of the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 41–64). Oxon: Routledge.
  • de Saussure, Ferdinand. (1983). Course in general linguistics (Translated by Roy Harris). London: Duckworth. [1916, Cours de linguistique générale (Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, in collaboration with Albert Reidlinger). Paris: Payot; 1922, Second edition; 1959, Course in general linguistics (Edited by Wade Baskin). New York: Philosophical Library; 1966, Reprint, New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967, 1972, (Édition critique préparée par Tullio de Mauro). Paris: Payot; 1986; Reprint, La Salle, IL: Open Court] Cited by19
    • Bennet, John. (2013). Epilogue. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 335–342). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.q
    • Boltz, William G. (1994). The origin and early development of the Chinese writing system (American Oriental Series 78). New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society. [2003, reprinted with corrections]
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Elvira Astoreca, Natalia. (2021a). Early Greek alphabetic writing: A linguistic approach (Contexts of and Relations Between Early Writing Systems 5). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Englehardt, Joshua (Ed.). (2012). Agency in ancient writing. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
    • Haralambous, Yannis. (2007). Fonts & encodings: From Unicode to advanced typography and everything in between (translated by P. Scott Horne). Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
    • Harris, Roy. (2000). Rethinking writing. London; New York: Continuum.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2011). The relation of orthographic units to linguistic units in the Japanese writing system: An analysis of kanji, kana and kanji-okurigana writing. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Tsukuba, Japan.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2021). A modular theoretic approach to the Japanese writing system: Possibilities and challenges. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 621–643). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-hond
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678466
    • Olson, David R., & Oatley, Keith. (2014). The quotation theory of writing. Written Communication, 31(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515164
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Powell, Barry B. (2009). Writing: Theory and history of the technology of civilization. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Street, Brian V., & Lefstein, Adam. (2007). Literacy: An advanced resource book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
  • de Saussure, Ferdinand. (1986). Course in general linguistics (Reprint) (Translated by Roy Harris). La Salle, IL: Open Court. [1916, Cours de linguistique générale (First edition) (Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, in collaboration with Albert Reidlinger). Paris: Payot; 1922, Second edition; 1959, Course in general linguistics (Edited by Wade Baskin). New York: Philosophical Library; 1966, Reprint, New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967, (Édition critique préparée par Tullio de Mauro). Paris: Payot; 1983, Course in general linguistics (Translated by Roy Harris). London: Duckworth] Cited by3
    • Ashworth, Evan. (2013). Language and ideologies and orthographies: Developing a writing system for Than Ówîngeh. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New Mexico.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Woodard, Roger D. (1994). On the interaction of Greek orthography and phonology: Consonant clusters in the syllabic scripts. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 311–334). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • De Silva, M. W. S. (1969). The phonological efficiency of the Maldivian writing system. Anthropological Linguistics, 11(7), 199–208. Cited by6
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2010b). Languages and scripts in the Maldive Islands: Coding and encoding. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 197–205). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2012). Invention and borrowing in the development and dispersal of writing systems. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 1–10). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Gair, James W., & Cain, Bruce D. (1996). Dhivehi writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 564–568). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2012). Maldivian Thaana, Japanese kana, and the representation of moras in writing [Special issue: Second language writing systems, edited by Benedetta Bassetti, Jyotsna Vaid, & Vivian Cook]. Writing Systems Research, 4(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.693459
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
  • De Silva, M. W. S. (1976). Diglossia and literacy. Mysore, India: Central Institute of Indian Languages. Cited by5
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1994b). Schriftlichkeit und Diglossie [Writing and diglossia]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 739–745). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Wijayathilake, Marasinghe A. D. K., & Parrila, Rauno. (2019). Reading and writing Sinhala. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 195–216). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_11
  • De Soto, J. L., & De Soto, C. B. (1983). Relationship of reading achievement to verbal processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(1), 116–127. Cited by4
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Ehrlich, Marie-France, Remond, Martine, & Tardieu, Hubert (1999). Processing of anaphoric devices in young skilled and less skilled comprehenders: Differences in metacognitive monitoring. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(1), 29–63.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
  • de Voogt, Alex. (2010a). Introducing writing on writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 1–5). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • de Voogt, Alex. (2010b). Languages and scripts in the Maldive Islands: Coding and encoding. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 197–205). Leiden; Boston: Brill. Cited by1
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2012). Invention and borrowing in the development and dispersal of writing systems. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 1–10). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • de Voogt, Alex. (2010c). The Caroline Islands script: A linguistic confrontation. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 327–343). Leiden; Boston: Brill. Cited by2
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2012). Invention and borrowing in the development and dispersal of writing systems. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 1–10). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2014). The cultural transmission of script in Africa: The presence of syllabaries. Scripta, 6, 121–143.
  • de Voogt, Alex. (2012). Invention and borrowing in the development and dispersal of writing systems. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 1–10). Leiden; Boston: Brill. Cited by5
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Handel, Zev. (2019). Sinography: The borrowing and adaptation of the Chinese script (Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis 1). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352223
    • Kornicki, Peter Francis. (2018). Languages, scripts, and Chinese texts in East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198797821.001
    • Salomon, Corinna. (2021). Comparative perspectives on the study of script transfer, and the origin of the runic script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 143–199). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-salo
    • van den Hout, Theo. (2020). A history of Hittite literacy: Writing and reading in Late Bronze-Age Anatolia (1650–1200 BC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860161
  • de Voogt, Alex. (2014). The cultural transmission of script in Africa: The presence of syllabaries. Scripta, 6, 121–143. Cited by1
    • Unseth, Peter. (2016a). The international impact of Sequoyah's Cherokee syllabary. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.03uns
  • de Voogt, Alex, & Döhla, Hans-Jörg. (2012). Nubian graffiti messages and the history of writing in the Sudanese Nile Basin. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 53–67). Leiden; Boston: Brill. Cited by3
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2014). The cultural transmission of script in Africa: The presence of syllabaries. Scripta, 6, 121–143.
    • Salomon, Corinna. (2021). Comparative perspectives on the study of script transfer, and the origin of the runic script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 143–199). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-salo
    • van den Hout, Theo. (2020). A history of Hittite literacy: Writing and reading in Late Bronze-Age Anatolia (1650–1200 BC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860161
  • de Voogt, Alex, & Finkel, Irving (Eds.). (2010). The idea of writing: Play and complexity. Leiden; Boston: Brill. Cited by3
    • Bodel, John, & Houston, Stephen (Eds.). (2021). The hidden language of graphic signs: Cryptic writing and meaningful marks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886505
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2012). Invention and borrowing in the development and dispersal of writing systems. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 1–10). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • de Voogt, Alex, & Döhla, Hans-Jörg. (2012). Nubian graffiti messages and the history of writing in the Sudanese Nile Basin. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 53–67). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • de Voogt, Alex, & Quack, Joachim Friedrich (Eds.). (2012). The idea of writing: Writing across borders. Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • De Weirdt, W. (1988). Speech perception and frequency discrimination in good and poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 163–183. Cited by5
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2008). Phonological representations for reading acquisition across languages. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 65–84). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Serniclaes, Willy. (2006). Allophonic perception in developmental dyslexia: Origin, reliability and implications of the categorical perception deficit [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 135–152.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Siegel, Linda S. (1997). The spelling performance of ESL and native speakers of English as a function of reading skill [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 387–406.
  • de Zeeuw, Marlies, Schreuder, Robert, & Verhoeven, Ludo T. W. (2015). Lexical processing of nominal compounds in first- and second-language learners across primary grades [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.926806 Cited by1
    • Wang, Min, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2015). Introduction to this special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.988109
  • Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, B. (2006). Getting to the root: Young writers' sensitivity to the role of root morphemes in the spelling of inflected and derived words. Journal of Child Language, 33, 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007409 Cited by5
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, & Dhooge, Sarah. (2010). Developmental stability and changes in the impact of root consistency on children's spelling. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1055–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9195-5
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, & Sparks, Erin. (2015). Children's spelling development: Theories and evidence. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 311–325). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Kemp, Nenagh. (2016). Children's first language acquisition of the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 191–204). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Tellings, Agnes, & Bouts, Lex. (2011). Dutch elementary school children's attribution of meaning to written pseudowords. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9225-3
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Deacon, S. H., Conrad, N., & Pacton, S. (2008). A statistical learning perspective on children's learning about graphotactic and morphological regularities in spelling. Canadian Psychology, 49(2), 118-124. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.118 Cited by7
    • Commissaire, Eva, Pasquarella, Adrian, Chen, Xi, & Deacon, S. Hélène. (2014). The development of orthographic processing skills in children in early French immersion programs [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.02com
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, & Dhooge, Sarah. (2010). Developmental stability and changes in the impact of root consistency on children's spelling. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1055–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9195-5
    • Ravid, Dorit Diskin. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling (Literacy Studies 3). New York: Springer.
    • Steacy, Laura M., Elleman, Amy M., & Compton, Donald L. (2017). Opening the “black box” of learning to read: Inductive learning mechanisms supporting word acquisition development with a focus on children who struggle to read. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 99–121). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Taha, Haitham, & Khateeb, Hala. (2018). Statistical learning and orthographic preferences among native Arab kindergarten and first graders. Writing Systems Research, 10(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2018.1473313
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2011). Similarities among the shapes of writing and their effects on learning [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.03tre [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 41–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Treiman, Rebecca, Mulqueeny, Kevin, & Kessler, Brett. (2015). Young children's knowledge about the spatial layout of writing. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.924386
  • Deacon, S. Hélène, Desrochers, Alain, & Levesque, Kyle. (2017). Learning to read French. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by1
    • Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in French. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 50–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.003
  • Deacon, S. Hélène, & Dhooge, Sarah. (2010). Developmental stability and changes in the impact of root consistency on children's spelling. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1055–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9195-5 Cited by1
    • Ravid, Dorit Diskin. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling (Literacy Studies 3). New York: Springer.
  • Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001110 Cited by29
    • Abu Ahmad, Hanadi, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Share, David L. (2014). Cognitive predictors of early reading ability in Arabic: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to grade 2. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 171–194). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Cain, Kate, Compton, Donald L., & Parrila, Rauno K. (2017c). Introduction to reading comprehension. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 237–238). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Carlisle, Joanne F., & Kearns, Devin M. (2017). Learning to read morphologically complex words. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 191–214). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Chen, Xi, Hao, Meiling, Geva, Esther, Zhu, Jin, & Shu, Hua. (2009). The role of compound awareness in Chinese children's vocabulary acquisition and character reading. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9127-9
    • Chik, Pakey Pui-man, Ho, Connie Suk-han, Yeung, Pui-sze, Chan, David Wai-ock, Chung, Kevin Kien-hoa, Luan, Hui, Lo, Lap-yan, & Lau, Wendy Suet-yee. (2012). Syntactic skills in sentence reading comprehension among Chinese elementary school children. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 679–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9293-4
    • Chung, Wei-Lun, & Hu, Chieh-Fang. (2007). Morphological awareness and learning to read Chinese. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9037-7
    • Fricke, Silke, Szczerbinski, Marcin, Stackhouse, Joy, & Fox-Boyer, Annette V. (2008). Predicting individual differences in early literacy acquisition in German: The role of speech and language processing skills and letter knowledge [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 103–146. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.02fri
    • Geva, Esther, & Shafman, Dana. (2010). Rudiments of inflectional morphology skills in emergent English–Hebrew biliterates. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 191–204). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_14
    • Hipfner-Boucher, Kathleen, Lam, Katie, Chen, Xi, & Deacon, S. Hélène. (2015). Exploring the effects of word features on French immersion children's ability to deconstruct morphologically complex words [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.943645
    • Jarmulowicz, Linda, Hay, Sarah E., Taran, Valentina L., & Ethington, Corinna A. (2008). Fitting derivational morphophonology into a developmental model of reading. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9073-y
    • Kieffer, Michael J., & Lesaux, Noneie K. (2008). The role of derivational morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing, 21(8), 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9092-8
    • Kirby, John R., & Bowers, Peter N. (2017). Morphological instruction and literacy: Binding phonological, orthographic, and semantic features of words. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 437–461). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Kirby, John R., Deacon, S. Hélène, Bowers, Peter N., Izenberg, Leah, Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Children's morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5
    • Kruk, Richard S., & Bergman, Krista. (2013). The reciprocal relations between morphological processes and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 10–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.014
    • Lew, Sigrid. (2014). A linguistic analysis of the Lao writing system and its suitability for minority language orthographies [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.846843
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Ko, In Yeong. (2018). The time course of activation of semantic and orthographic information in morphological decomposition by Korean adults and developing readers. Frontiers in Communication, 3:51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00051
    • Llaurado, Anna, & Tolchinsky, Liliana. (2016). The developmental pattern of spelling in Catalan from first to fifth school grade. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.1000812
    • Luo, Yang Cathy, Chen, Xi, & Geva, Esther. (2014). Concurrent and longitudinal cross-linguistic transfer of phonological awareness and morphological awareness in Chinese-English bilingual children [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.05luo
    • McBride, Catherine. (2017). Early literacy across languages. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 55–74). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Nunes, Terezinha, Burman, Diana, Evans, Deborah, & Bell, Daniel. (2010). Writing a language that you can't hear. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 109–128). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Perfetti, Charles, & Harris, Lindsay. (2017). Learning to read English. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 347–370). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ramirez, Gloria, Chen, Xi, Geva, Esther, & Kiefer, Heidi. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2013). A tale of one letter: Morphological processing in early Arabic spelling. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.857586
    • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Elouty, Arige. (2018). Inflectional and derivational morphological awareness in Arabic-speaking High versus Low EFL literacy students. Written Language & Literacy, 21(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00013.sai
    • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, Esther. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Shechter, Ady, Lipka, Orly, & Katzir, Tami. (2018). Predictive models of word reading fluency in Hebrew. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:1882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01882
    • Tong, Xiuli, & McBride-Chang, Catherine. (2010). Chinese-English biscriptal reading: Cognitive component skills across orthographies [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9211-9
    • Weiss, Silvana, Grabner, Roland H., Kargl, Reinhard, Purgstaller, Christian, & Fink, Andreas. (2010). Behavioral and neurophysiological effects of morphological awareness training on spelling and reading. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 645–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9177-7
  • Deacon, S. Hélène, & Sparks, Erin. (2015). Children's spelling development: Theories and evidence. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 311–325). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Deacon, S. Hélène, Tong, Xiuli, & Mimeau, Catherine. (2019). Morphological and semantic processing in developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 327–349). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.015
  • Deacon, S. H., Wade-Woolley, L., & Kirby, J. (2007). Crossover: The role of morphological awareness in French Immersion children's reading. Developmental Psychology, 43, 732–746. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.732 Cited by11
    • Geva, Esther, & Shafman, Dana. (2010). Rudiments of inflectional morphology skills in emergent English–Hebrew biliterates. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 191–204). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_14
    • Hipfner-Boucher, Kathleen, Lam, Katie, & Chen, Xi. (2014). The effects of bilingual education on the English language and literacy outcomes of Chinese-speaking children [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.06hip
    • Hipfner-Boucher, Kathleen, Lam, Katie, Chen, Xi, & Deacon, S. Hélène. (2015). Exploring the effects of word features on French immersion children's ability to deconstruct morphologically complex words [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.943645
    • Jared, Debra. (2015). Literacy and literacy development in bilinguals. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 165–182). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Kieffer, Michael J., & Lesaux, Noneie K. (2012). Knowledge of words, knowledge about words: Dimensions of vocabulary in first and second language learners in sixth grade. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 347–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9272-9
    • McBride, Catherine. (2017). Early literacy across languages. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 55–74). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Ramirez, Gloria, Chen, Xi, Geva, Esther, & Kiefer, Heidi. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9
    • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Elouty, Arige. (2018). Inflectional and derivational morphological awareness in Arabic-speaking High versus Low EFL literacy students. Written Language & Literacy, 21(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00013.sai
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
    • Tong, Xiuli, & McBride-Chang, Catherine. (2010). Chinese-English biscriptal reading: Cognitive component skills across orthographies [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9211-9
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (2017b). Learning to read in a second language. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 215–234). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Deacon, S. H., Wade-Woolley, L., & Kirby, J. R. (2009). Flexibility in young second-language learners: Examining the language specificity of orthographic processing. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01392.x. Cited by5
    • Cho, Jeung-Ryeul. (2018). Cognitive-linguistic skills and reading and writing in Korean Hangul, Chinese Hanja, and English among Korean children. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 391–410). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Commissaire, Eva, Pasquarella, Adrian, Chen, Xi, & Deacon, S. Hélène. (2014). The development of orthographic processing skills in children in early French immersion programs [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.02com
    • Kirby, John R., Deacon, S. Hélène, Bowers, Peter N., Izenberg, Leah, Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Children's morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5
    • Niolaki, Georgia Z., Terzopoulos, Aris R., & Masterson, Jackie. (2014). Varieties of developmental dyslexia in Greek children. Writing Systems Research, 6(2), 230–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.893862
    • Zaretsky, Elena. (2014). The role of L1 and L2 reading on L1 preservation and positive cross-linguistic transfer among sequential bilinguals [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.07zar
  • Deacon, S. H., Whalen, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2011). Do children see the danger in dangerous? Grade 4, 6, and 8 children's reading of morphologically complex words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000166 Cited by5
    • Carlisle, Joanne F., & Kearns, Devin M. (2017). Learning to read morphologically complex words. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 191–214). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Casalis, Séverine, Commissaire, Eva, & Duncan, Lynne G. (2015). Sensitivity to morpheme units in English as L2 word recognition [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.976165
    • Hipfner-Boucher, Kathleen, Lam, Katie, Chen, Xi, & Deacon, S. Hélène. (2015). Exploring the effects of word features on French immersion children's ability to deconstruct morphologically complex words [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.943645
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Ko, In Yeong. (2018). The time course of activation of semantic and orthographic information in morphological decomposition by Korean adults and developing readers. Frontiers in Communication, 3:51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00051
    • Perfetti, Charles, & Harris, Lindsay. (2017). Learning to read English. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 347–370). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Deater-Deckard, Kirby, Mullineaux, Paula Y., Petrill, Stephen A., & Thompson, Lee A. (2009). Effortful control, surgency, and reading skills in middle childhood. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9111-9
  • Deavers, Rachael P., & Brown, Gordon D. A. (1997). Rules versus analogies in children's spelling: Evidence for task dependence [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 339–361. Cited by2
    • Bosse, Marie-Line, Valdois, Sylviane, & Tainturier, Marie-Josèphe. (2003). Analogy without priming in early spelling development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(7), 693–716.
    • Nation, Kate. (1997). Children's sensitivity to rime unit frequency when spelling words and nonwords [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007938810898
  • Debiais, Vincent. (2017). Writing on medieval doors: The surveyor angel on the moissac capital (ca. 1100). In Irene Berti, Katharina Bolle, Fanny Opdenhoff, & Fabian Stroth (Eds.), Writing matters: Presenting and perceiving monumental inscriptions in antiquity and the middle ages (Materiale Textkulturen 14) (pp. 285–307). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110534597-012 Cited by1
    • Neufeld, Christine. (2019). Writing spaces: Inscriptions on architecture. In Ricarda Wagner, Christine Neufeld, Ludger Lieb (Eds.), Writing beyond pen and parchment: Inscribed objects in medieval European literature (Materiale Textkulturen 30) (pp. 223–238). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515_9783110645446-012
  • Decker, S. N. (1989). Cognitive processing rates among disabled and normal reading young adults: A nine year follow-up study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 123–134. Cited by4
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Laasonen, Marja, Service, Elisabet, Lipsanen, Jari, & Virsu, Veijo. (2012). Adult developmental dyslexia in a shallow orthography: Are there subgroups? Reading and Writing, 25(1), 71–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9248-9
    • Leinonen, Seija, Müller, Kurt, Leppänen, Paavo H. T., Aro, Mikko, Ahonen, Timo, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2001). Heterogeneity in adult dyslexic readers: Relating processing skills to the speed and accuracy of oral text reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 265–296.
    • Samuelsson, Stefan, Gustavsson, Ann, Herkner, Birgitta, & Lundberg, Ingvar. (2000). Is the frequency of dyslexic problems among prison inmates higher than in a normal population? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 297–312.
  • Decorte, Roeland P.-J. E. (2017a). Cretan ‘Hieroglyphic’ and the nature of script. In Philippa M. Steele (Ed.). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems (pp. 33–56). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books. Cited by3
    • Bennet, John. (2017a). Final reflections. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 247–253). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
  • Deffenbacher, K. E., Kenyon, J. B., Hoover, D. M., Olson, R. K., Pennington, B. F., DeFries, J. C., & Smith, S. D. (2004). Refinement of the 6p21.3 quantitative trait locus influencing dyslexia: Linkage and association analyses. Human Genetics, 115, 128–138. Cited by6
    • Barr, Cathy L., & Couto, Jillian M. (2008). Molecular genetics of reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 255–281). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Byrne, Brian, Samuelsson, Stefan, Wadsworth, Sally, Hulslander, Jacqueline, Corley, Robin, DeFries, John C., Quain, Peter, Willcutt, Erik G., & Olson, Richard K. (2007). Longitudinal twin study of early literacy development: Preschool through Grade 1 [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9019-9
    • Grigorenko, Elena L. (2008). Four “nons” of the brain–genes connection. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 283–308). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Grigorenko, Elena L., Naples, Adam, Chang, Joseph, Romano, Christina, Ngorosho, Damaris, Kungulilo, Selemani, Jukes, Matthew, & Bundy, Donald. (2007). Back to Africa: Tracing dyslexia genes in east Africa [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9017-y
    • Olson, Richard K. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on word-reading skills. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 233–253). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Defior, S., Martos, F., & Cary, L. (2002). Differences in reading acquisition development in two shallow orthographies: Portuguese and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23(1), 135–148. Cited by13
    • Bodé, Sylvie, Serres, Joyce, & Ugen, Sonja. (2009). Similarities and differences of Luxembourgish and Romanophone 12 year olds' spelling strategies in German and in French. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.04bod
    • Brunswick, Nicola. (2010). Unimpaired reading development and dyslexia across different languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 131–154). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Caravolas, Markéta, & Samara, Anna. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 326–343). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Defior, Sylvia, & Serrano, Francisca. (2017). Learning to read Spanish. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 270-298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (2015). How children learn to read words. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 293–310). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Levin, Iris, Aram, Dorit, Tolchinsky, Liliana, & McBride, Catherine. (2013). Maternal mediation of writing and children's early spelling and reading: The Semitic abjad versus the European alphabet [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.797335
    • Pollo, Tatiana Cury, Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2008). Three perspectives on spelling development. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 175–189). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rahbari, Noriyeh, Sénéchal, Monique, & Arab-Moghaddam, Narges. (2007). The role of orthographic and phonological processing skills in the reading and spelling of monolingual Persian children. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9042-x
    • Sainz, Javier S. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Spanish. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 151–169). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sun-Alperin, M. Kendra, & Wang, Min. (2011). Cross-language transfer of phonological and orthographic processing skills from Spanish L1 to English L2. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9221-7
    • Weingarten, Rüdiger. (2011). Comparative graphematics [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 12–38. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.02wei [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 13–39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Winskel, Heather, & Iemwanthong, Kanyarat. (2010). Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1021–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9194-6
  • Defior, Sylvia, & Serrano, Francisca. (2005). The initial development of spelling in Spanish: From global to analytical. Reading and Writing, 18(1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5893-1 Cited by5
    • Defior, Sylvia, & Serrano, Francisca. (2017). Learning to read Spanish. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 270-298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Rahbari, Noriyeh, Sénéchal, Monique, & Arab-Moghaddam, Narges. (2007). The role of orthographic and phonological processing skills in the reading and spelling of monolingual Persian children. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9042-x
    • Ravid, Dorit Diskin. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling (Literacy Studies 3). New York: Springer.
    • Rolla San Francisco, Andrea, Mo, Elaine, Carlo, María, August, Diane, & Snow, Catherine. (2006). The influences of language of literacy instruction and vocabulary on the spelling of Spanish–English bilinguals. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9012-3
    • Vilageliu, Olga Soler, Lasheras, Cristina Sotoca, Ramis, Yago, & Castellà, Judit. (2016). Development of literacy and notational knowledge: Prediction of literacy development difficulties through graphomotor measures in grade 1. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 77–92). Cham: Springer.
  • Defior, Sylvia, & Serrano, Francisca. (2017). Learning to read Spanish. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 270-298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Defior, S., & Tudela, P. (1994). Effect of phonological training on reading and writing acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 299–320. Cited by7
    • Aidinis, Athanasios, & Nunes, Terezinha. (2001). The role of different levels of phonological awareness in the development of reading and spelling in Greek. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1/2), 145–177.
    • Defior, Sylvia, & Serrano, Francisca. (2017). Learning to read Spanish. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 270-298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (2006). Alphabetics instruction helps students learn to read. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 649–677). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Foulin, Jean Noel. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2
    • Goikietxea, Edurne. (2005). Levels of phonological awareness in preliterate and literate Spanish-speaking children. Reading and Writing, 18(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-1955-7
    • Hintikka, Sini, Aro, Mikko, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2005). Computerized training of the correspondences between phonological and orthographic units [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 155–178.
    • Valdois, Sylviane, Bosse, Marie-Line, Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., Zorman, Michel, David, D., & Pellat, Jacques. (2003). Phonological and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from two case studies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(6), 541–572.
  • DeFrancis, John. (1947). Japanese language reform: Politics and phonetics. Far Eastern Survey, 16(19), 217–220. Cited by4
    • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag]
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Fishman, Joshua A. (1977a). Preface: Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. xi-xxviii). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Gottlieb, Nanette. (1995). Kanji politics: Language policy and Japanese script. London; New York: Kegan Paul International. [2016, reprinted, London; New York: Routledge]
  • DeFrancis, John. (1950). Nationalism and language reform in China. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [1972, Reprinted edition, New York: Octagon Books] Cited by17
    • Bachner, Andrea. (2014). Beyond Sinology: Chinese writing and the scripts of culture (Global Chinese Culture). New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • DeFrancis, John. (1967). Language and script reform in China. In Thomas A. Sebeok (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics: Volume 2 (pp. 130–150). The Hague: Mouton. [1977, Reprinted, In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 121–148). The Hague; Paris: Mouton]
    • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag]
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Fishman, Joshua A. (1977a). Preface: Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. xi-xxviii). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Hannas, William C. (2003). The writing on the wall: How Asian orthography curbs creativity (Encounters with Asia). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Li, Yu. (2020). The Chinese writing system in Asia: An interdisciplinary perspective. London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345333
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • Mair, Victor H. (1996). Modern Chinese writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 200–208). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Martin, Samuel E. (1972). Nonalphabetic writing systems: Some observations. In James F. Kavanagh & Ignatius G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 81–102). Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
    • Mattingly, Ignatius G. (1992). Linguistic awareness and orthographic form. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 11–26). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Mullaney, Thomas S. (2017). The Chinese typewriter: A history. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Shockey, Nathan. (2019). The typographic imagination: Reading and writing in Japan's age of modern print media (Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute). New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Venezky, Richard L. (1977). Principles for the design of practical writing systems. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 37–54). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Wang, Shaomei. (2012a). Chinese writing reform: A socio-psycholinguistic perspective. In Ken Goodman, Shaomei Wang, Mieko Shimizu Iventosch, & Yetta Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 45–67). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Wang, Xuan. (2018). Fangyan and the linguistic landscapes of authenticity: Normativity and innovativity of writing in globalizing China. In Constanze Weth & Kasper Juffermans (Eds.), Tyranny of writing: Ideologies of the written word (Bloomsbury advances in sociolinguistics) (pp. 165–182). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • DeFrancis, John. (1967). Language and script reform in China. In Thomas A. Sebeok (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics: Volume 2 (pp. 130–150). The Hague: Mouton. [1977, Reprinted, In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 121–148). The Hague; Paris: Mouton] Cited by4
    • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag]
    • Fishman, Joshua A. (1977a). Preface: Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. xi-xxviii). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Martin, Samuel E. (1972). Nonalphabetic writing systems: Some observations. In James F. Kavanagh & Ignatius G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 81–102). Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
    • Stubbs, Michael. (1980). Language and literacy: The sociolinguistics of reading and writing. London; Boston; Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • DeFrancis, John. (1950). Nationalism and language reform in China. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [1950, Originally published, Princeton: Princeton University Press] Cited by4
    • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag]
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Mair, Victor H. (1996). Modern Chinese writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 200–208). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Shang, Wei. (2014). Writing and speech: Rethinking the issue of vernaculars in early modern China. In Benjamin A. Elman (Ed.), Rethinking East Asian languages, vernaculars, and literacies, 1000–1919 (Sinica Leidensia 115) (pp. 254–301). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004279278_011
  • DeFrancis, John. (1977a). Colonialism and language policy in Viet Nam. The Hague: Mouton. Cited by11
    • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag]
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Glück, Helmut. (1994). Schriften im Kontakt [Writing systems in contact]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 745–766). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Hannas, William C. (2003). The writing on the wall: How Asian orthography curbs creativity (Encounters with Asia). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Iventosch, Meiko Shimizu. (2012a). Orthography: Human creativity and adaptability. In Ken Goodman, Shaomei Wang, Mieko Shimizu Iventosch, & Yetta Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 99–113). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. (2000). Sejong's theory of literacy and writing [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin w. Kim, Elmer H., Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 13–45.
    • Kornicki, Peter Francis. (2018). Languages, scripts, and Chinese texts in East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198797821.001
    • Li, Yu. (2020). The Chinese writing system in Asia: An interdisciplinary perspective. London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345333
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • Smalley, William A. (1994a). Codification by means of foreign systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 697–708). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • DeFrancis, John. (1977b). Language and script reform in China. Reprinted in Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 121–148). The Hague; Paris: Mouton. [1967, Originally published in Thomas A. Sebeok (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics: Volume 2 (pp. 130–150). The Hague: Mouton. ] Cited by7
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag]
    • Glück, Helmut. (1994). Schriften im Kontakt [Writing systems in contact]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 745–766). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Rogers, Henry. (1995). Optimal orthographies. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 31–43). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Stubbs, Michael. (1980). Language and literacy: The sociolinguistics of reading and writing. London; Boston; Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Tsao, Feng-fu. (2008a). The language planning situation in Taiwan. In Robert B. Kaplan & Richard B. Baldauf Jr. (Eds.), Language planning and policy in Asia, Volume 1: Japan, Nepal, Taiwan and Chinese characters (Language Planning and Policy) (pp. 237–284). Bristol; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
  • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag] Cited by79
    • Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [2007, Second edition]
    • Bertelson, Paul, Chen, Hsuan-Chih, & de Gelder, Béatrice. (1997). Explicit speech analysis and orthographic experience in Chinese readers. In Hsuan-Chih Chen, (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 27–46). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Boltz, William G. (1996). Early Chinese writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 191–199). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Chen, Xi, & Pasquarella, Adrian. (2017). Learning to read Chinese. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 31–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Chik, Pakey Pui-man, Ho, Connie Suk-han, Yeung, Pui-sze, Chan, David Wai-ock, Chung, Kevin Kien-hoa, Luan, Hui, Lo, Lap-yan, & Lau, Wendy Suet-yee. (2012). Syntactic skills in sentence reading comprehension among Chinese elementary school children. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 679–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9293-4
    • Chrisomalis, Stephen. (2017). Re-evaluating merit: Multiple overlapping factors explain the evolution of numerical notations. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1227688
    • Cook, Vivian. (2004). The English writing system. (The English Language series). London Hodder Arnold. [2014, reprinted, London: New York: Routledge]
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1994a). Theorie der Schriftgeschichte [Theory of the history of writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 256–264). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2000). The nationalization of writing [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30(1), 47–59.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Creamer, Thomas. (1994). The Chinese experiences and models of promotion of literacy. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 835–855). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1992b). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 83–110). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Eom, Ik-sang. (2009). Discrepancies between sounds and graphs: Irregular readings of Chinese characters [Special issue: Writing systems and linguistic structure, edited by Sang-Oak Lee]. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.04eom
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Galambos, Imre. (2014b). The Chinese script. Chinese Studies, Oxford Bibliographies (added: 28/04/2014). http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/browse?module_0=obo-9780199920082
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Glück, Helmut. (1994). Schriften im Kontakt [Writing systems in contact]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 745–766). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Gu, Ming Dong. (2000). Reconceptualizing the linguistic divide: Chinese and Western theories of the written sign. Comparative Literature Studies, 37(2), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1353/cls.2000.0012
    • Handel, Zev. (2015). Logography and the classification of writing systems: A response to Unger. Scripta, 7, 109–150.
    • Handel, Zev. (2019). Sinography: The borrowing and adaptation of the Chinese script (Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis 1). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352223
    • Hannas, William C. (2003). The writing on the wall: How Asian orthography curbs creativity (Encounters with Asia). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Ho, Connie Suk-Han, Wong, Yau-Kai, Yeung, Pui-Sze, Chan, David Wai-ock, Chung, Kevin Kien-Hoa, Lo, Sau-Ching, & Luan, Hui. (2012). The core components of reading instruction in Chinese. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 857–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9303-1
    • Houston, Stephen. (1994). Literacy among the Pre-Columbian Maya: A comparative perspective. In Elizabeth H. Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 27–49). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Hung, Yueh-Nu. (2012a). How a morphosyllabic writing system works in Chinese. In Ken Goodman, Shaomei Wang, Mieko Shimizu Iventosch, & Yetta Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 16–31). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Hung, Yueh-Nu. (2012b). Similarities and dissimilarities in reading Chinese and English: Goodman's reading model perspective. In Ken Goodman, Shaomei Wang, Mieko Shimizu Iventosch, & Yetta Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 32–44). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Keightley, David N. (1989). The origins of writing in China: Scripts and cultural contexts. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 171–202). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    • Li, David C. S. (2000). Phonetic borrowing. Key to the vitality of written Cantonese in Hong Kong. Written Language & Literacy, 3(2), 199–233.
    • Li, Jie. (1996). Das chinesische Schriftsystem [The Chinese writing system]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1404–1412). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Li, Yu. (2020). The Chinese writing system in Asia: An interdisciplinary perspective. London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345333
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Singh, Anisha. (2018). Introduction to script processing in Chinese and cognitive consequences for bilingual reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 25–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Lippert, Wolfgang. (1996). Die schriftliche Sprache im Chinesischen [Written language: Chinese]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1467–1476). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • Mair, Victor H. (1996). Modern Chinese writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 200–208). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Matsunaga, Sachiko. (2016). Teaching and learning to read kanji as L2: Why are they difficult? In Jun Xing, & Pak-sheung Ng (Eds.), Indigenous culture, education and globalization: Critical perspectives from Asia (pp. 245–262). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48159-2_13
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Mumin, Meikal. (2014). The Arabic script in Africa: Understudied literacy. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 41–76). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • O'Neill, Timothy Michael. (2016). Ideography and Chinese language theory: A history (Welten Ostasiens - Worlds of East Asia - Mondes de l'Extrême Orient 26). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Osterkamp, Sven, & Schreiber, Gordian. (2021). Challenging the dichotomy between phonography and morphography: Transitions and gray areas. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 47–82). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-oste
    • Parkard, Jerome, Chen, Xi, Li, Wenling, Wu, Xinchun, Gaffney, Janet S., Li, Hong, & Anderson, Richard C. (2006). Explicit instruction in orthographic structure and word morphology helps Chinese children learn to write characters. Reading and Writing, 19(5), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9003-4
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Powell, Barry B. (2009). Writing: Theory and history of the technology of civilization. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Robinson, Andrew. (1995). The story of writing: Alphabets, hieroglyphs & pictograms. London: Thames & Hudson. [2007, Revised edition]
    • Robinson, Andrew. (2009b). Writing and script: A very short introduction (Very Short Introductions). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rogers, Henry. (1995). Optimal orthographies. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 31–43). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2016a). Typology and the study of writing systems. Linguistic Typology, 20(3), 561–567. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0027
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2018). From phonemic spelling to distinctive spelling [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00008.sam
    • Schindelin, Cornelia. (2019). The li-variation (隶变/隸變) lìbiàn. When the ancient Chinese writing changed to modern Chinese script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 227–243). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-schi
    • Scollon, Ron, & Scollon, Suzanne Wong, (1998). Literate design in the discourses of revolution, reform, and transition: Hong Kong and China. Written Language & Literacy, 1(1), 1–39.
    • Slaměníková, Tereza. (2019). On the nature of unmotivated components in modern Chinese characters. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 209–226). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-slam
    • Smalley, William A. (1994a). Codification by means of foreign systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 697–708). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Smalley, William, Chia Koua Vang, & Gnia Yee Yang. (1990). Mother of writing: The origin and development of a Hmong messianic script. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2008). [Book review: Shouhui Zhao & Richard B. Baldauf, Jr., (2008), Planning Chinese characters: Reaction, evolution or revolution]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.07spr
    • Sproat, Richard. (2010). Language, technology, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2013). A note on Unger's “What linguistic units do Chinese characters represent?” Written Language & Literacy, 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.1.05spr
    • Sproat, Richard. (2017). A computational model of the discovery of writing. Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 194-226. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00004.spr
    • Sproat, Richard. (2018). [Book review: Peter T. Daniels, (2018), An exploration of writing]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(2), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00017.spr
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1995). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.3 [2014, Revised edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14)]
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
    • Tenny, Carol. (2016). A linguist looks at AAC: Language representation systems for augmentative and alternative communication, compared with writing systems and natural language. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 84–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.959459
    • Tiun Hak-khiam. (1998). Writing in two scripts: A case study of digraphia in Taiwanese. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 225–248.
    • Tranter, Nicolas. (2013). Logography and layering: A functional cross-linguistic analysis. Written Language & Literacy, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.1.01tra
    • Unger, J. Marshall. (2004). Ideogram: Chinese characters and the myth of disembodied meaning. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Unger, J. Marshall. (2011). What linguistic units do Chinese characters represent? Written Language & Literacy, 14(2), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.06ung
    • Unger, J. Marshall, & DeFrancis, John. (1995). Logographic and semasiographic writing systems: A critique of Sampson's classification. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 45–58). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Wang, Shaomei. (2012a). Chinese writing reform: A socio-psycholinguistic perspective. In Ken Goodman, Shaomei Wang, Mieko Shimizu Iventosch, & Yetta Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 45–67). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Woods, Christopher. (2010a). Introduction. Visible language: The earliest writing systems. in Christopher Woods (Ed.) with the assistance of Geoff Emberling & Emily Teeter, Visible language: Inventions of writing in the ancient Middle East and beyond (Oriental Institute Museum Publications 32) (pp. 15–25). Chicago, IL: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
    • Xu, Duoduo. (2021). A semantic index for a Dongba script database. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 985–1006). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-xudu
    • Zhao, Shouhui. (2008). Chinese character modernisation in the digital era: A historical perspective. In Robert B. Kaplan & Richard B. Baldauf Jr. (Eds.), Language planning and policy in Asia, Volume 1: Japan, Nepal, Taiwan and Chinese characters (Language Planning and Policy) (pp. 38–101). Bristol; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
  • DeFrancis, John. (1984b). Digraphia. Word, 35(1), 59–66. Cited by8
    • Angermeyer, Philipp Sebastian. (2012). Bilingualism meets digraphia: Script alternation and hybridity in Russian-American writing and beyond. In Mark Sebba, Shahrzad Mahootian, & Carla Jonsson (Eds.), Language mixing and code-switching in writing: Approaches to mixed-language written discourse (Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism 2) (pp. 255–272). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1994b). Schriftlichkeit und Diglossie [Writing and diglossia]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 739–745). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag]
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Tiun Hak-khiam. (1998). Writing in two scripts: A case study of digraphia in Taiwanese. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 225–248.
    • Unseth, Peter. (2008). The sociolinguistics of script choice: An introduction [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.030
  • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. Cited by149
    • Ahmed, Yusra, Wagner, Richard K., & Kantor, Patricia Thatcher. (2012). How visual word recognition is affected by developmental dyslexia. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 196–215). London: Psychology Press.
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Aronoff, Mark. (1994). Spelling as culture. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 67–86). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Bentin, Shlomo. (1992). Phonological awareness, reading, and reading acquisition: A survey and appraisal of current knowledge. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 193–210). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Boone, Elizabeth Hill. (1994a). Introduction: Writing and recorded knowledge. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 3–26). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Brekle, Herbert E. (1994d). Typographie [Typography]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 204–227). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Buckley, Eugene. (2018). Core syllables vs. moraic writing [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00009.buc
    • Carello, Claudia, & Turvey, M. T., Lukatela, Georgije. (1992). Can theories of word recognition remain stubbornly nonphonological? In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 211–226). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Chang, Li-Yun, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2018). Visual factors in writing system variation: Measurement and implications for reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 49–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Chung, Kevin K. H., Ho, Connie S.-H., Chan, David W., Tsang, Suk-Man, & Lee, Suk-Han. (2011). Cognitive skills and literacy performance of Chinese adolescents with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 835–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9227-1
    • Cossu, Giuseppe. (1999b). Biological constraints on literacy acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 213–237.
    • Cossu, Giuseppe. (2003). The role of output speech in literacy acquisition: Evidence from congenital anarthria [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 99–122.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1994a). Theorie der Schriftgeschichte [Theory of the history of writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 256–264). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996b). Typology of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1380–1387). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2001). Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 43–80). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. [2017, Second edition, (pp. 75–94)]
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2006). On beyond alphabets [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.03dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2010a). Introducing writing on writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 1–5). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2010c). The Caroline Islands script: A linguistic confrontation. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 327–343). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, Tong, Xiuli, & Mimeau, Catherine. (2019). Morphological and semantic processing in developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 327–349). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.015
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Ellis, Nick C., Miwa, Natsume, Stavropoulou, Katerina, Hoxhallari, Lorenc, Van Daal, Victor H.P., Polyzoe, Nicoletta, Tsipa, Maria-Louisa, & Petalas, Michalis. (2004). The effects of orthographic depth on learning to read alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic scripts. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 438–468. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.4.5
    • Elvira Astoreca, Natalia. (2021a). Early Greek alphabetic writing: A linguistic approach (Contexts of and Relations Between Early Writing Systems 5). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Farmer, Steve, Sproat, Richard, & Witzel, Michael. (2004). The collapse of the Indus-script thesis: The myth of a literate Harappan civilization. Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 11(2), 19–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/ejvs.2004.2.620
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Galambos, Imre. (2014b). The Chinese script. Chinese Studies, Oxford Bibliographies (added: 28/04/2014). http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/browse?module_0=obo-9780199920082
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1984). A history of writing. London: British Library. [1987, Second edition; 1992, Third revised edition, London: British Library; New York: Abbeville Press]
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Gu, Ming Dong. (2000). Reconceptualizing the linguistic divide: Chinese and Western theories of the written sign. Comparative Literature Studies, 37(2), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1353/cls.2000.0012
    • Haarmann, Harald (2006). Language planning: Graphization and the development of writing systems [Sprachplanung: Graphisation und die Entwicklung von Schreibsystemen]. In Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier, & Peter Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society [Ein internationales Handbuch zur Wissenschaft von Sprache und Gesellschaft] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistic and Communication Science 3.3) (pp. 2402–2420). Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110184181.3.11.2402
    • Habib, Sandy, & Kurzon, Dennis. (2008). The systematization and typology of the instant messaging writing system used by young Israeli Arabs. Written Language & Literacy, 11(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.1.04hab
    • Hannas, William C. (2003). The writing on the wall: How Asian orthography curbs creativity (Encounters with Asia). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Harris, Roy. (2000). Rethinking writing. London; New York: Continuum.
    • Henderson, Edmund H. (1992). The interface of lexical competence and knowledge of written words. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 1–30). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2007). Kana digraphs and morae: A structural analysis. Written Language & Literacy, 10(1), 65–82.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2011). The relation of orthographic units to linguistic units in the Japanese writing system: An analysis of kanji, kana and kanji-okurigana writing. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Tsukuba, Japan.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2019). What do kanji graphs represent in the current Japanese writing system? Towards a unified model of kanji as written signs. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 185–208). Brest: Fluxus Editions. http://www.fluxus-editions.fr/gla1-hond.pdf
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2021). A modular theoretic approach to the Japanese writing system: Possibilities and challenges. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 621–643). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-hond
    • Houston, Stephen. (1994). Literacy among the Pre-Columbian Maya: A comparative perspective. In Elizabeth H. Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 27–49). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Hung, Daisy L., Tzeng, Ovid J. L., & Tzeng, Angela K. Y. (1992). Automatic activation of linguistic information in Chinese character recognition. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 119–130). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Jeong, Junghye, Katz, Leonard, & Lee, Yang. (2018). The two-dimensional orthography of phonology and morphology in differentiating Korean and Chinese. Writing Systems Research, 10(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2018.1519482
    • Joyce, Terry. (2004). Modeling the Japanese mental lexicon: Morphological, orthographic and phonological considerations. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in Psychological Research: Volume 31 (pp. 27–61). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Joyce, Terry. (2014). [Book review: Richard Sproat, (2010), Language, technology, and society]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.08joy
    • Joyce, Terry. (2016). Writing systems and scripts. In Andrea Rocci & Louis de Saussure (Eds.), Verbal communication (Handbooks of Communication Science 3) (pp. 287–308). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255478-016
    • Joyce, Terry, & Borgwaldt, Susanne R. (2011). Typology of writing systems: Special issue introduction [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.01joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Joyce, Terry, Hodošček, Bor, & Nishina, Kikuko. (2012). Orthographic representation and variation within the Japanese writing system: Some corpus-based observations [Special issue: Units of language – units of writing, edited by Terry Joyce & David Roberts]. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 254–278. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.2.07joy
    • Joyce, Terry, & Masuda, Hisashi. (2018). Introduction to the multi-script Japanese writing system and word processing. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 179–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Joyce, Terry, & Ohta, Nobuo. (2002). Constituent morpheme frequency data for two-kanji compound words. Tsukuba Psychological Research, 24, 111–141.
    • Kalindi, Sylvia Chanda, Chung, Kevin Kien Hoa, Liu, Duo Phil, & Wang, Li-Chih Angus. (2018). The complexities of written Chinese and the cognitive-linguistic precursors to reading, with consequent implications for reading interventions. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 99–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Kaminska, Zofia. (2003). Little Frog and Toad: Interaction of orthography and phonology in Polish spelling [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 61–80.
    • Katz, Leonard, & Frost, Ram. (1992b). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62789-2
    • Kess, Joseph F., & Miyamoto, Tadao. (1999). The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Kim, Chin W. (1997). The structure of phonological units in Han'gŭl. In Young-Key Kim-Renaud (Ed.), The Korean alphabet: Its history and structure (pp. 145–160). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. (1997a). Introduction. In Young-Key Kim-Renaud (Ed.), The Korean alphabet: Its history and structure (pp. 1–10). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. (2000). Sejong's theory of literacy and writing [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin w. Kim, Elmer H., Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 13–45.
    • Ko, Hwawei, & Tzeng, Ovid J. L. (2000). The role of phonological awareness in a phonetically opaque script [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachu]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 119–132.
    • Kurzon, Dennis. (2013). Diacritics and the Perso-Arabic script [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 234–243, https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.799451
    • Küster, Marc Wilhelm. (2019). Open and closed writing systems. Some reflections. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 17–26). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-kues
    • Lee, Ki-Moon. (1997). The inventor of the Korean alphabet. In Young-Key Kim-Reynaud (Ed.), The Korean alphabet: Its history and structure (pp. 11–30). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Leong, Che-Kan. (2002a). ‘Cognitive conjunction’ analysis of processing Chinese. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 1–31). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Leong, Che-Kan. (2002c). Segmental analysis and reading in Chinese. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 227–245). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Li, David C. S. (2000). Phonetic borrowing. Key to the vitality of written Cantonese in Hong Kong. Written Language & Literacy, 3(2), 199–233.
    • Li, Jie. (1996). Das chinesische Schriftsystem [The Chinese writing system]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1404–1412). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Li, Yu. (2020). The Chinese writing system in Asia: An interdisciplinary perspective. London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345333
    • Liberman, Alvin M. (1992). The relation of speech to reading and writing. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 167–178). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Lin, Angel Mei-yi, & Akamatsu, Nobuhiko. (1997). The learnability and psychological processing of reading in Chinese and reading in English. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 369–387). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • Lyons, Martyn, & Marquilhas, Rita (Eds.). (2017). Approaches to the history of written culture: A world inscribed (New Directions in Book History). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54136-5
    • Mair, Victor H. (1996). Modern Chinese writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 200–208). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Man, John. (2000). Alpha Beta: How 26 letters shaped the Western world. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Matsunaga, Sachiko. (2016). Teaching and learning to read kanji as L2: Why are they difficult? In Jun Xing, & Pak-sheung Ng (Eds.), Indigenous culture, education and globalization: Critical perspectives from Asia (pp. 245–262). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48159-2_13
    • Mattingly, Ignatius G. (1992). Linguistic awareness and orthographic form. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 11–26). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • McCarthy, Suzanne. (1995). The Cree syllabary and the writing system riddle: A paradigm in crisis. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 59–75). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • McDougall, Siné, Brunswick, Nicola, & de Mornay Davies, Paul. (2010). Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies: An introduction and overview. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 3–21). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Melka, Tomi S. (2013). On a “kinetic”-like sequence in rongorongo tablet “Mamari”. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.742005
    • Melka, Tomi S., & Stanley, Jeffrey C. (2012). Performance of Seraphinian in reference to some statistical tests [Special issue: The writing system at play, edited by Vivian Cook, Benedetta Bassetti, & Jyotsna Vaid]. Writing Systems Research, 4, 140–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.683052
    • Mikulska, Katarzyna. (2019a). Introduction: Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach [translation by Jerome A. Offner]. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 3–22). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c000b
    • Mullaney, Thomas S. (2017). The Chinese typewriter: A history. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Mumin, Meikal. (2014). The Arabic script in Africa: Understudied literacy. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 41–76). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Myers, James. (2019). The grammar of Chinese characters: Productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthograhic system (Routledge Studies in East Asian Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Osterkamp, Sven, & Schreiber, Gordian. (2021). Challenging the dichotomy between phonography and morphography: Transitions and gray areas. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 47–82). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-oste
    • Pae, Hye K. (2018a). Written languages, East-Asian scripts, and cross-linguistic influences: An introduction. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Perfetti, Charles A., & Liu, Ying. (2005). Orthography to phonology and meaning: Comparisons across and within writing systems [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2344-y
    • Perfetti, Charles A., Liu, Ying, & Tan, Li-Tan. (2002). How the mind can meet the brain in reading: A comparative writing systems approach. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 35–60). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Piquette, Kathryn E. (2018b). Signs and symbols. In Andrew Gardner, Mark Lake, & Ulrike Sommer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of archaeological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199567942.013.020
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Pope, Maurice. (1975). The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphics to Linear B. London: Thames & Hudson: New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. [1999, Revised edition, The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphs to Maya script. London; New York: Thames & Hudson]
    • Primus, Beatrice. (2004). A featural analysis of the Modern Roman Alphabet [Special issue: From letter to sound, edited by Martin Neef & Beatrice Primus]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(2), 235–274. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.2.06pri
    • Rimzhim, Anurag, Katz, Leonard, & Fowler, Carol A. (2014). Brāhmī-derived orthographies are typologically Āksharik but functionally predominantly alphabetic [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855618
    • Robinson, Andrew. (1995). The story of writing: Alphabets, hieroglyphs & pictograms. London: Thames & Hudson. [2007, Revised edition]
    • Robinson, Andrew. (2009b). Writing and script: A very short introduction (Very Short Introductions). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Ryan, Des. (2015). Google doodles: Evidence of how graphemes' colour, shape, size and position can interact to make writing multidimensional. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.912578
    • Ryan, Des. (2017). Principles of English spelling formation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Trinity College Dublin, Dublin.
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2016a). Typology and the study of writing systems. Linguistic Typology, 20(3), 561–567. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0027
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2018). From phonemic spelling to distinctive spelling [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00008.sam
    • Sampson, Geoffrey, & Chen, Zhiqun. (2013). The reality of compound ideographs. Journal of Chinese linguistics, 41(2), 255–272.
    • Sasaki, Miho. (2005). The effect of L1 reading processes on L2: A crosslinguistic comparison of Italian and Japanese users of English. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (289–308). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Schoch, Robert M., & Melka, Tomi S. (2021). A “Sacred Amulet from Easter Island—1885/6—”: Analyzing enigmatic glyphic characters in the context of the rongorongo script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 847–903). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-scho
    • Sebba, Mark. (2007). Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486739
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Fowler, Anne E. (2004). Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(5), 483–515. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044598.81628.e6
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Lundquis, Eric. (1992). On the relations between learning to spell and learning to read. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 179–192). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Silva, Cláudia. (2011). Writing in Portuguese chats :) : A new wrtng systm? [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.07sil [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 147–159). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Smalley, William A. (1994a). Codification by means of foreign systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 697–708). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Smalley, William A. (1994b). Native creation of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 708–720). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Smith, Janet S. (Shibamoto), & Schmidt, David L. (1996). Variability in written Japanese: Toward a sociolinguistics of script choice. Visible Language, 30(1), 46–71.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Song, Hye Jeong, & Wiese, Richard. (2010). Resistance to complexity interacting with visual shape—German and Korean orthography. Writing Systems Research, 2(2) 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq010
    • Sproat, Richard. (1998). [Book review: Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), (1996), The world's writing systems]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(1), 129–137.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2003). A formal computational analysis of Indic scripts. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 9–40). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2010). Language, technology, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2013). A note on Unger's “What linguistic units do Chinese characters represent?” Written Language & Literacy, 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.1.05spr
    • Sproat, Richard. (2016). English among the writing systems of the world. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 27–40). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2017). A computational model of the discovery of writing. Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 194-226. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00004.spr
    • Sproat, Richard, & Gutkin, Alexander. (2021). The taxonomy of writing systems: How to measure how logographic a system is. Computational Linguistics, 47(3), 477–528. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00409
    • Su, I-Fan, Klingebiel, Kathrin, & Weekes, Brendan S. (2010). Dyslexia in Chinese: Implications for connectionist models of reading. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 199–219). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Templeton, Shane, & Bear, Donald R. (1992). A summary and synthesis: “Teaching the lexicon to read and spell”. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Tenny, Carol. (2016). A linguist looks at AAC: Language representation systems for augmentative and alternative communication, compared with writing systems and natural language. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 84–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.959459
    • The Unicode Consortium. (1991). The Unicode Standard: Version 1.0. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [1996, Version 2.0; 2003, Version, 4.0.0; 2005, Version 5.0; 2011, Version 6.0.0; 2016, Version 9.0.0; 2018, Version 11.0.0]
    • Tranter, Nicolas. (2013). Logography and layering: A functional cross-linguistic analysis. Written Language & Literacy, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.1.01tra
    • Tzeng, Ovid J. L., Hung, Daisy L., Lee, Wei Ling, & Chang, Ji-Mei. (1996). Cross-Linguistic analyses of basic reading processes. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1101–1117). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Unger, J. Marshall. (2004). Ideogram: Chinese characters and the myth of disembodied meaning. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Unger, J. Marshall. (2011). What linguistic units do Chinese characters represent? Written Language & Literacy, 14(2), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.06ung
    • Unger, J. Marshall, & DeFrancis, John. (1995). Logographic and semasiographic writing systems: A critique of Sampson's classification. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 45–58). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Van Auken, Newell Ann. (2003). [Book review: Oliver Moore, (2000), Chinese]. Written Language & Literacy, 6(2), 246–250.
    • Wagner, Richard K., Piasta, Shayne B., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (2006). Learning to read. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 1111–1142). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Wang, Min, Lin, Candise Y., & Gao, Wei. (2010). Bilingual compound processing: The effects of constituent frequency and semantic transparency. Writing Systems Research, 2(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq012
    • Wang, Yifan. (2019). What are we calling “Latin script”? Name and reality in the grammatological terminology. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 91–109). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-wang
    • Weekes, Brendan, Chen, May Jane, & Yu, Bo-lin. (1997). Repetition priming effects of Chinese characters and pseudocharacters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 171–186). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Whittaker, Gordon. (2011). Writing systems. In Patrick Colm Hogan (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences (pp. 935–939). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Woods, Christopher. (2010a). Introduction. Visible language: The earliest writing systems. in Christopher Woods (Ed.) with the assistance of Geoff Emberling & Emily Teeter, Visible language: Inventions of writing in the ancient Middle East and beyond (Oriental Institute Museum Publications 32) (pp. 15–25). Chicago, IL: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
    • Zadka, Małgorzata. (2018). Semasiographic principle in Linear B inscriptions. Writing Systems Research, 10(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2019.1588835
    • Zevin, Jason D. (2019). Modeling developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 372–390). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.017
  • DeFrancis, John. (2002). The ideographic myth. In Mary S. Erbaugh (Ed.), Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6) (pp. 1–20). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University. Cited by4
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Joyce, Terry, & Borgwaldt, Susanne R. (2011). Typology of writing systems: Special issue introduction [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.01joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Li, David C. S. (2018). Writing Chinese: A challenge for Cantonese-L1 and South Asian Hongkongers. In Constanze Weth & Kasper Juffermans (Eds.), Tyranny of writing: Ideologies of the written word (Bloomsbury advances in sociolinguistics) (pp. 149–163). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    • Myers, James. (2019). The grammar of Chinese characters: Productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthograhic system (Routledge Studies in East Asian Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
  • DeFrancis, John. (2011). Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag. [1984, The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press] Cited by1
    • Schindelin, Cornelia. (2019). The li-variation (隶变/隸變) lìbiàn. When the ancient Chinese writing changed to modern Chinese script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 227–243). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-schi
  • DeFrancis, John, & Unger, J. Marshall. (1994). Rejoinder to Geoffrey Sampson: “Chinese script and the diversity of writing systems”. Linguistics, 32(3), 549–554. Cited by16
    • Handel, Zev. (2015). Logography and the classification of writing systems: A response to Unger. Scripta, 7, 109–150.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2019). What do kanji graphs represent in the current Japanese writing system? Towards a unified model of kanji as written signs. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 185–208). Brest: Fluxus Editions. http://www.fluxus-editions.fr/gla1-hond.pdf
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Joyce, Terry. (2016). Writing systems and scripts. In Andrea Rocci & Louis de Saussure (Eds.), Verbal communication (Handbooks of Communication Science 3) (pp. 287–308). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255478-016
    • Joyce, Terry, & Borgwaldt, Susanne R. (2011). Typology of writing systems: Special issue introduction [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.01joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Li, Jie. (1996). Das chinesische Schriftsystem [The Chinese writing system]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1404–1412). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • Pae, Hye K. (2018a). Written languages, East-Asian scripts, and cross-linguistic influences: An introduction. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Robinson, Andrew. (1995). The story of writing: Alphabets, hieroglyphs & pictograms. London: Thames & Hudson. [2007, Revised edition]
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sebba, Mark. (2001). [Book review: Gunther Kress, (2000), Early spelling: Between convention and creativity]. Written Language & Literacy, 4(2), 261–264.
    • Sebba, Mark. (2007). Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486739
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2013). A note on Unger's “What linguistic units do Chinese characters represent?” Written Language & Literacy, 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.1.05spr
    • Sproat, Richard. (2016). English among the writing systems of the world. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 27–40). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Unger, J. Marshall. (2004). Ideogram: Chinese characters and the myth of disembodied meaning. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
  • DeFries, J. C. (1985). Colorado reading project. In D. B. Gray & J. F. Kavanagh (Eds.), Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia (pp. 107–122). Parkton, MD: York Press. Cited by3
    • Boada, Richard, Willcutt, Erik G., Tunick, Rachel A., Chhabildas, Nomita A., Olson, Richard K., DeFries, John C., & Pennington, Bruce F. (2002). A twin study of the etiology of high reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 683–707.
    • Hawke, Jesse L., Wadsworth, Sally J., Olson, Richard K., & DeFries, John C. (2007). Etiology of reading difficulties as a function of gender and severity [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9016-z
    • Wadsworth, Sally J., Knopik, Valerie S., & DeFries, J. C. (2000). Reading disability in boys and girls: No evidence for a differential genetic etiology. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 133–145.
  • DeFries, J. C., Filipek, P. A., Fulker, D. W., Olson, R. K., Pennington, B. F., Smith, S. D., & Wise, B. W. (1997). Colorado Learning Disabilities Research Center. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 7–19. Cited by9
    • Betjemann, Rebecca S., Willcutt, Erik G., Olson, Richard K., Keenan, Janice M., DeFries, John C., & Wadsworth, Sally J. (2008). Word reading and reading comprehension: stability, overlap and independence. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9076-8
    • Boada, Richard, Willcutt, Erik G., Tunick, Rachel A., Chhabildas, Nomita A., Olson, Richard K., DeFries, John C., & Pennington, Bruce F. (2002). A twin study of the etiology of high reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 683–707.
    • Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, Peterson, Robin, Olson, Richard, & Pennington, Bruce. (2009). Component reading skills in Down Syndrome. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9114-6
    • Hawke, Jesse L., Wadsworth, Sally J., Olson, Richard K., & DeFries, John C. (2007). Etiology of reading difficulties as a function of gender and severity [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9016-z
    • Keenan, Janice M., & Betjemann, Rebecca S. (2008a). Comprehension of single words: The role of semantics in word identification and reading disability. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 191–210). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Olson, Richard, & Datta, Helen. (2002). Visual-temporal processing in reading-disabled and normal twins [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 127–149.
    • Olson, Richard K., Keenan, Janice M., Byrne, Brian, & Samuelsson, Stefan. (2017). Genetic and environmental influences on the development of reading and related skills. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 33–53). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Wadsworth, Sally J., Knopik, Valerie S., & DeFries, J. C. (2000). Reading disability in boys and girls: No evidence for a differential genetic etiology. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 133–145.
  • DeFries, J. C., Fulker, D. W., & LaBuda, M. C. (1987). Evidence for a genetic aetiology in reading disability of twins. Nature, 239, 537–539. Cited by5
    • Barr, Cathy L., & Couto, Jillian M. (2008). Molecular genetics of reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 255–281). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Bates, Timothy C., Castles, Anne, Luciano, Michelle, Wright, Margaret J., Coltheart, Max, & Martin, Nicholas G. (2007). Genetic and environmental bases of reading and spelling: A unified genetic dual route model [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9022-1
    • Olson, Richard K. (2006). Genetics?? and environmental influences on the development of reading and related cognitive skills. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 693–707). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Olson, Richard K., Keenan, Janice M., Byrne, Brian, & Samuelsson, Stefan. (2017). Genetic and environmental influences on the development of reading and related skills. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 33–53). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • DeFries, J. C., & Gillis, J. J. (1993). Genetics of reading disability. In R. Plomin & G. E. McClearn (Eds.), Nature, nurture, and psychology (pp. 121–145). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Cited by6
    • Barr, Cathy L., & Couto, Jillian M. (2008). Molecular genetics of reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 255–281). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Boada, Richard, Willcutt, Erik G., Tunick, Rachel A., Chhabildas, Nomita A., Olson, Richard K., DeFries, John C., & Pennington, Bruce F. (2002). A twin study of the etiology of high reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 683–707.
    • Hawke, Jesse L., Wadsworth, Sally J., Olson, Richard K., & DeFries, John C. (2007). Etiology of reading difficulties as a function of gender and severity [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9016-z
    • Little, Callie W., Wang, Frances, & Hart, Sara A. (2016). Behavioral and molecular genetic influences on reading-related outcomes. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 14–32). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Wadsworth, Sally J., Knopik, Valerie S., & DeFries, J. C. (2000). Reading disability in boys and girls: No evidence for a differential genetic etiology. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 133–145.
  • DeFries, J. C., Olson, R. K., Pennington, B. F., & Smith, S. D. (1991). Colorado Reading Project: Past, present, and future. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2, 37–46. Cited by3
    • Boada, Richard, Willcutt, Erik G., Tunick, Rachel A., Chhabildas, Nomita A., Olson, Richard K., DeFries, John C., & Pennington, Bruce F. (2002). A twin study of the etiology of high reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 683–707.
    • Hawke, Jesse L., Wadsworth, Sally J., Olson, Richard K., & DeFries, John C. (2007). Etiology of reading difficulties as a function of gender and severity [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9016-z
    • Wadsworth, Sally J., Knopik, Valerie S., & DeFries, J. C. (2000). Reading disability in boys and girls: No evidence for a differential genetic etiology. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 133–145.
  • DeFries, J. C., Stevenson, J., Gillis, J. J., & Wadsworth, S. J. (1991). Genetic aetiology of spelling deficits in the Colorado and London twin studies of reading disability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3, 271–283. Cited by3
    • Bates, Timothy C., Castles, Anne, Luciano, Michelle, Wright, Margaret J., Coltheart, Max, & Martin, Nicholas G. (2007). Genetic and environmental bases of reading and spelling: A unified genetic dual route model [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9022-1
    • Boada, Richard, Willcutt, Erik G., Tunick, Rachel A., Chhabildas, Nomita A., Olson, Richard K., DeFries, John C., & Pennington, Bruce F. (2002). A twin study of the etiology of high reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 683–707.
    • Lewis, Barbara A., Freebairn, Lisa A., & Taylor, H. Gerry. (2002). Correlates of spelling abilities in children with early speech sound disorders. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 389–407.
  • Degand, Liesbeth, & Sanders, Ted. (2002). The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 739–757. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020932715838 Cited by5
    • Bailin, Alan, & Grafstein, Ann. (2016). Readability: Text and context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Lindgren, Eva, Leijten, Mariëlle, & Van Waes, Luuk. (2011). Adapting to the reader during writing. Written Language & Literacy, 14(2), 188–223. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.02lin
    • Rydland, Veslemøy, Aukrust, Vibeke Grøver, & Fulland, Helene. (2012). How word decoding, vocabulary and prior topic knowledge predict reading comprehension. A study of language-minority students in Norwegian fifth grade classrooms. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9279-2
    • Sánchez, Emilio, & García, J. Ricardo. (2009). The relation of knowledge of textual integration devices to expository text comprehension under different assessment conditions. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1081–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9145-7
    • Tellings, Agnes E. J. M., & Penning de Vries, Bart. (2020). Connective frequencies in child-directed texts: A corpus analysis in comparison to theorized orders of connective acquisition and to connective frequencies in adult-directed texts. Written Language & Literacy, 23(1), 59–91. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00033.tel
  • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking. Cited by27
    • Andrews, Sally. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Bennet, John. (2013). Epilogue. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 335–342). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.q
    • Bodel, John, & Houston, Stephen (Eds.). (2021). The hidden language of graphic signs: Cryptic writing and meaningful marks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886505
    • Bouhali, Florence, Thiebaut de Schotten, Michel, Pinel, Philippe, Poupon, Cyril, Mangin, Jean-François, Dehaene, Stanislas, & Cohen, Laurent. (2014). Anatomical connections of the visual word form area. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(46), 15402–15414. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4918-13.201
    • Brandt, Deborah. (2015). The rise of writing: Redefining mass literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Englehardt, Joshua (Ed.). (2012). Agency in ancient writing. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
    • Handel, Zev. (2015). Logography and the classification of writing systems: A response to Unger. Scripta, 7, 109–150.
    • Li, David C. S. (2018). Writing Chinese: A challenge for Cantonese-L1 and South Asian Hongkongers. In Constanze Weth & Kasper Juffermans (Eds.), Tyranny of writing: Ideologies of the written word (Bloomsbury advances in sociolinguistics) (pp. 149–163). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Norris, Dennis. (2013). Models of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.003
    • Olson, David R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678466
    • Olson, David R., & Oatley, Keith. (2014). The quotation theory of writing. Written Communication, 31(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515164
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Pandey, Pramod. (2014). Akshara-to-sound rules for Hindi [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855622
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Schmalz, Xenia, Marinus, Eva, Coltheart, Max, & Castles, Anne. (2015). Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1614–1629. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0835-2
    • Share, David L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(752). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
    • Share, David L. (2020). Extricating reading science from entrenched anglocentricism, eurocentricism, and alphabetism and embracing global diversity: A personal journey. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 4(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.28987/ijrld.4.2.3
    • Shuai, Lan, Frost, Stephen J., Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Neurocognitive markers of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 277–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.013
    • Sproat, Richard. (2016). English among the writing systems of the world. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 27–40). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2017). A computational model of the discovery of writing. Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 194-226. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00004.spr
    • Sproat, Richard, & Gutkin, Alexander. (2021). The taxonomy of writing systems: How to measure how logographic a system is. Computational Linguistics, 47(3), 477–528. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00409
    • Stein, John F. (2012). Biological-level account of developmental dyslexia. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 216–243). London: Psychology Press.
    • van den Hout, Theo. (2020). A history of Hittite literacy: Writing and reading in Late Bronze-Age Anatolia (1650–1200 BC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860161
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Perfetti, Charles, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Introduction: Developmental dyslexia – A cross-linguistic perspective. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.001
  • Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2011). The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.003 Cited by10
    • Andrews, Sally. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Bouhali, Florence, Thiebaut de Schotten, Michel, Pinel, Philippe, Poupon, Cyril, Mangin, Jean-François, Dehaene, Stanislas, & Cohen, Laurent. (2014). Anatomical connections of the visual word form area. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(46), 15402–15414. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4918-13.201
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Carreiras, Manuel, Armstrong, Blair C., Perea, Manuel, & Frost, Ram. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Hannagan, Thomas. (2014). What is special about orthographic processing? [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 225–252. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.03gra
    • Myers, James. (2019). The grammar of Chinese characters: Productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthograhic system (Routledge Studies in East Asian Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Overmann, Karenleigh A. (2016). Beyond writing: The development of literacy in the ancient Near East. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000019
    • Shuai, Lan, Frost, Stephen J., Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Neurocognitive markers of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 277–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.013
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Perfetti, Charles, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Introduction: Developmental dyslexia – A cross-linguistic perspective. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.001
    • Woollams, Anna M. (2015). What does acquired dyslexia tell us about reading in the mind and brain? In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 149–164). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Morais, J., & Kolinsky, R. (2015). Illiterate to literate: Behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(4), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3924 Cited by7
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Davidson, Andrew. (2019). Writing: The re-construction of language. Language Sciences, 72, 134–149. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.09.004
    • Facoetti, Andrea, Franceschini, Sandro, & Gori, Simone. (2019). Role of visual attention in developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 307–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.014
    • Myers, James. (2019). The grammar of Chinese characters: Productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthograhic system (Routledge Studies in East Asian Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Shuai, Lan, Frost, Stephen J., Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Neurocognitive markers of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 277–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.013
  • Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004 Cited by14
    • Bouhali, Florence, Thiebaut de Schotten, Michel, Pinel, Philippe, Poupon, Cyril, Mangin, Jean-François, Dehaene, Stanislas, & Cohen, Laurent. (2014). Anatomical connections of the visual word form area. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(46), 15402–15414. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4918-13.201
    • Carreiras, Manuel, Armstrong, Blair C., Perea, Manuel, & Frost, Ram. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Englehardt, Joshua (Ed.). (2012). Agency in ancient writing. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Grainger, Jonathan & Dufau, Stéphane. (2012). The front end of visual word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 159–184). London: Psychology Press.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Hannagan, Thomas. (2014). What is special about orthographic processing? [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 225–252. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.03gra
    • Khateb, Asaid, Taha, Haitham Y., Elias, Inas, & Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2013). The effect of the internal orthographic connectivity of written Arabic words on the process of the visual recognition: A comparison between skilled and dyslexic readers [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.834244
    • Kinoshita, Sachiko. (2015). Visual word recognition in the Bayesian reader framework. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 63–75). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Norris, Dennis. (2013). Models of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.003
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Ravid, Dorit Diskin. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling (Literacy Studies 3). New York: Springer.
    • Taha, Haitham. (2016). Deep and shallow in Arabic orthography: New evidence from reading performance of elementary school native Arab readers. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1114910
  • Dehaene, S., Le Clec' H. G., Poline, J. B., Bihan, D. L., & Cohen, L. (2002). The visual word form area: A prelexical representation of visual words in the left fusiform gyrus. Neuroreport, 13(3), 321–325. Cited by9
    • Bouhali, Florence, Thiebaut de Schotten, Michel, Pinel, Philippe, Poupon, Cyril, Mangin, Jean-François, Dehaene, Stanislas, & Cohen, Laurent. (2014). Anatomical connections of the visual word form area. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(46), 15402–15414. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4918-13.201
    • Carreiras, Manuel, Armstrong, Blair C., Perea, Manuel, & Frost, Ram. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Richards, Todd L., Berninger, Virginia W., Stock, Pat, Altemeier, Leah, Trivedi, Pamala, & Maravilla, Kenneth R. (2011). Differences between good and poor child writers on fMRI contrasts for writing newly taught and highly practiced letter forms. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9217-3
    • Sibley, Daragh E., & Kello, Christopher T. (2012). Learned orthographic representations facilitates large-scale modeling of word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 28–51). London: Psychology Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
    • Woollams, Anna M. (2015). What does acquired dyslexia tell us about reading in the mind and brain? In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 149–164). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Dehaene, S., Pegado, F., Braga, L. W., Ventura, P., Filho, G. N., Jobert, A., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Kolinsky, R., Morais, J., & Cohen, L. (2010). How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science, 330 (6009), 1359–1364. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194140 Cited by10
    • Andrews, Sally. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Ashby, Jane. (2016). Why does prosody accompany fluency? Re-conceptualizing the role of phonology in reading. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 65–89). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_5
    • Cao, Fan. (2018). Brain mechanisms of Chinese word reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 137–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Hannagan, Thomas. (2014). What is special about orthographic processing? [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 225–252. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.03gra
    • Jasińska, Kaja K., Frost, Stephen, Molfese, Peter, Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, Rueckl, Jay, & Pugh, Ken. (2016). Neuroimaging perspectives on skilled and impaired reading and the bilingual experience. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_3
    • Kolinsky, Régine. (2015). How learning to read influences language and cognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 377–393). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Overmann, Karenleigh A. (2016). Beyond writing: The development of literacy in the ancient Near East. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000019
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Parrila, Rauno K., & Protopapas, Athanassios. (2017). Dyslexia and word reading problems. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 333–358). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in French. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 50–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.003
  • Dehn, Mechthild. (1986). On the acquisition of the phonemic principle of spelling for learning to read and to write. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 432–443). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Dehn, Mechthild. (1988). Zeit für die Schrift. Lesenlernen und Schreibenkönnen. Bochum. [1994, fourth edition] Cited by4
    • Dehn, Mechthild, & Sjölin, Amelie. (1996). Frühes Lesen und Schreiben [Early reading and writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1141–1153). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Friedrich, Bodo. (1996). Aspekte und Probleme des Schreibunterrichts: Rechtschreiben [Aspects and problems of the teaching of writing: Spelling]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1249–1260). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Giese, Heinz W. (1994). Literalität und Analphabetismus in modernen Industrieländern [Literacy and illiteracy in modern industrial nations]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 883–893). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Neuhaus-Siemon, Elisabeth. (1996). Aspekte und Probleme des Schreibunterrichts: Erstschreiben [Aspects and problems of the teaching of writing: Beginning writing skills]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1240–1248). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Dehn, Mechthild, & Sjölin, Amelie. (1996). Frühes Lesen und Schreiben [Early reading and writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1141–1153). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Dehouve, Danièle. (2019). The “law of the series”: A proposal for the decipherment of Aztec ritual language [translation by Jerome A. Offner]. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 95–122). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c003
  • Déjerine, J. (1891). Sur un cas de cécité verbale avec agraphie suivi d'autopsie. Mémoires de la Société de Biologie, 3, 197–201. Cited by6
    • Bhatt, Prath M. (1988). Graphic systems, phonic systems, and linguistic representations. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 106–120). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Tzeng, Ovid J. L., & Hung, Daisy L. (1988b). Orthography, reading, and cerebral functions. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 273–290). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Tzeng, Ovid J. L., Hung, Daisy L., Lee, Wei Ling, & Chang, Ji-Mei. (1996). Cross-Linguistic analyses of basic reading processes. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1101–1117). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Déjerine, J. (1892). Contribution a l'étude anatomopathologique et clinique des différentes variétés de cécité verbale. Mémoires de la Société de Biologie, 4, 61–90. Cited by9
    • Bhatt, Prath M. (1988). Graphic systems, phonic systems, and linguistic representations. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 106–120). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Bouhali, Florence, Thiebaut de Schotten, Michel, Pinel, Philippe, Poupon, Cyril, Mangin, Jean-François, Dehaene, Stanislas, & Cohen, Laurent. (2014). Anatomical connections of the visual word form area. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(46), 15402–15414. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4918-13.201
    • Cossu, Giuseppe. (1999a). The acquisition of Italian orthography. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 10–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Cossu, Giuseppe. (1999b). Biological constraints on literacy acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 213–237.
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Lecours, André Roch, & Nespoulous, Jean-Luc. (1988). The biology of writing. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 236–245). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
  • del Barco, Javier. (2020). From scroll to codex: Dynamics of text layout transformation in the Hebrew Bible. In Bradford A. Anderson (Ed.), From scrolls to scrolling: Sacred texts, materiality, and dynamic media cultures (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam – Tension, Transmission, Transformation 12) (pp. 91–118). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110634440-006
  • Delbreilh, Fanny. (2015). Writing acts and writing performativity: Producing and disseminating leaflets. In Georgeta Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface (pp. 203–227). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.11del
  • Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 96, 283–321. Cited by12
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Bourdin, Béatrice, & Fayol, Michel. (2000). Is graphic activity cognitively costly? A developmental approach. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 183–196.
    • Kim, Jeesun, Taft, Marcus, & Davis, Chris. (2004). Orthographic-phonological links in the lexicon: When lexical and sublexical information conflict [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 187–218.
    • Lambert, Eric, Kandel, Sonia, Fayol, Michel, & Espéret, Eric. (2008). The effect of the number of syllables on handwriting production. Reading and Writing, 21(9), 859–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9095-5
    • Macizo, Pedro, & Van Petten, Cyma. (2007). Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 295–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9032-z
    • Maggio, Severine, Chenu, Florence, Bes de Berc, Guillemette, Pesci, Blandine, Lété, Bernard, Jisa, Harriet, & Fayol, Michel. (2015). Producing written noun phrases in French. Written Language & Literacy, 18(1), 1–24. doi 10.1075/wll.18.1.01mag
    • Nooteboom, Sieb. (2007). Alphabetics: From phonemes to letters or from letters to phonemes? [Special issue: Constraints on spelling changes, edited by Guido Nottbusch & Eliane Segers]. Written Language & Literacy, 10(2), 129–143.
    • Seidenberg, Mark S., & McClelland, James L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
    • Taft, Marcus. (2015). The nature of lexical representation in visual word recognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 99–113). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo, & Hatsuzuka, Makiko. (1998). The effects of morphological semantics on the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 293–322. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 139–168). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Weekes, Brendan, Davies, Robert, & Chen, May Jane. (2002). Picture-word interference effects on naming in Chinese. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 101–127). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Will, Udo, Nottbusch, Guido, & Weingarten, Rüdiger. (2006). Linguistic units in word typing: Effects of word presentation modes and typing delay [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.10wil
  • Demb, J. B., Boynton, G. M., & Heeger, D. J. (1998). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of early visual pathways in dyslexia. Journal of Neuroscience, 18(17), 6939–6951. Cited by4
    • Booth, James R., Perfetti, Charles A., MacWhinney, Brian, & Hunt, Sean B. (2000). The association of rapid temporal perception with orthographic and phonological processing in children and adults with reading impairment. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 101–132.
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Edwards, Jerri D., Walley, Amanda C., & Ball, Karlene K. (2003). Phonological, visual and temporal processing in adults with and without reading disability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(8), 737–758.
    • Valdois, Sylviane, Bosse, Marie-Line, Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., Zorman, Michel, David, D., & Pellat, Jacques. (2003). Phonological and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from two case studies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(6), 541–572.
  • Demont, É., & Gombert, J. E. (1996). Phonological awareness as a predictor of recoding skills and syntactic awareness as a predictor of comprehension skills. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(3), 315–332. Cited by12
    • Anthony, Jason L., Williams, Jeffrey M., Aghara, Rachel G., Dunkelberger, Martha, Novak, Barbara, & Mukherjee, Anuja Divatia. (2010). Assessment of individual differences in phonological representation. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 969–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9185-7
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, Desrochers, Alain, & Levesque, Kyle. (2017). Learning to read French. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Duncan, Lynne G., Castro, São Luís, Defior, Sylvia, Seymour, Philip H. K., Baillie, Sheila, Leybaert, Jacqueline, Mousty, Philippe, Genard, Nathalie, Sarris, Menelaos, Porpodas, Costas D., Lund, Rannveig, Sigurðsson, Baldur, Þráinsdóttir, Anna S., Sucena, Ana, & Serrano, Francisca. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009
    • Goswami, Usha. (2006). Orthography, phonology, and reading development: A cross-linguistics perspective. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 463–480). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2008). Phonological representations for reading acquisition across languages. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 65–84). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2010). A psycholinguistic grain size view of reading acquisition across languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 23–42). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Laurent, Angélique, & Martinot, Clara. (2010). Bilingualism and phonological awareness: The case of bilingual (French–Occitan) children [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9209-3
    • Lefrançois, Pascale, & Armand, Françoise. (2003). The role of phonological and syntactic awareness in second-language reading: The case of Spanish-speaking learners of French. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 219–246.
    • Oakhill, Jane V., Berenhaus, Molly S., & Cain, Kate. (2015). Children's reading comprehension and comprehension difficulties. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 344–360). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Seigneuric, Alix, & Ehrlich, Marie-France. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children's reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 617–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0
    • Walton, Partrick D., Bowden, Michael E., Kurtz, Shelly L., & Angus, Mary. (2001). Evaluation of a rime-based reading program with Shuswap and Heiltsuk First Nations prereaders. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 229–264.
    • Wesseling, Ralph, & Reitsma, Pieter. (2000). The transient role of explicit phonological recoding for reading acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 313–336.
  • Demsky, A. (1977). A proto-Canaanite abecedary dating from the period of the judges and its implications for the history of the alphabet. Tel Aviv, 4, 14–27. Cited by7
    • Demsky, Aaron. (2015). The interface of oral and written traditions in ancient Israel: The case of the abecedaries. In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 17–48). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    • Goody, Jack. (1983). Literacy and achievement in the ancient world. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 83–97). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Goody, Jack. (1987). The interface between the written and oral (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Millard, A. R. (1986). The infancy of the alphabet. World Archaeology, 17(3), 390–398.
    • O'Connor, M. (1996c). The alphabet as a technology. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 787–794). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sass, Benjamin. (1988). The genesis of the alphabet and its development in the second millenium B.C. (Ägyten und Altes Testament 13). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
    • Schniedewind, William M. (2019). The finger of the scribe: How scribes learned to write the Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Demsky, Aaron. (2015). The interface of oral and written traditions in ancient Israel: The case of the abecedaries. In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 17–48). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Cited by2
    • Elti di Rodeano, Sveva. (2021). Scripts in contact: Transmission of the first alphabets. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 223–239). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-rode
    • Schniedewind, William M. (2019). The finger of the scribe: How scribes learned to write the Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Denckla, M. B. (1972). Color-naming defects in dyslexic boys. Cortex, 8, 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(72)80016-9 Cited by5
    • Chiappe, Penny, Stringer, Ron, Siegel, Linda S., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2002). Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 73–107.
    • Cutting, Laurie E., & Denckla, Martha Bridge. (2001). The relationship of rapid serial naming and word reading in normally developing readers: An exploratory model. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 673–705.
    • Shechter, Ady, Lipka, Orly, & Katzir, Tami. (2018). Predictive models of word reading fluency in Hebrew. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:1882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01882
    • Stringer, Ronald W., Toplak, Maggie E., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2004). Differential relationships between RAN performance, behaviour ratings, and executive function measures: Searching for a double dissociation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 891–914.
    • Wolf, Maryanne, O'Rourke, Alyssa Goldberg, Gidney, Calvin, Lovett, Maureen, Cirino, Paul, & Morris, Robin. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013816320290
  • Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1974). Rapid “automatized” naming of pictured objects, colors, letters and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10(2), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(74)80009-2 Cited by27
    • Abouzeid, Mary P. (1992). Stages of word knowledge in reading disabled children. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 279–306). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Arfé, Barbara, & Pizzocaro, Eleonora. (2016). Sentence generation in children with and without problems of written expression. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 327–344). Cham: Springer.
    • Asaad, Hanan, & Eviatar, Zohar. (2013). The effects of orthographic complexity and diglossia on letter naming in Arabic: A developmental study. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.862163
    • Babayiğit, Selma, & Stainthorp, Rhona. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y
    • Bekebrede, Judith, van der Leij, Aryan, & Share, David L. (2009). Dutch dyslexic adolescents: Phonological-core variable-orthographic differences. Reading and Writing, 22(2), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9105-7
    • Berninger, Virginia, Abbott, Robert D., & Alsdorf, Barbara J. (1997). Lexical- and sentence-level processes in comprehension of written sentences. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 135–162.
    • Bowers, Patricia G., & Newby-Clark, Elissa. (2002). The role of naming speed within a model of reading acquisition [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 109–126.
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Candan, Ecehan, Babür, Nalan, Haznedar, Belma, & Erçetin , Gülcan. (2020). Reading and spelling skills in transparent orthographies: Phonological encoding and rapid automatized naming in Turkish. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 185–201). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_12
    • Cho, Jeung-Ryeul. (2018). Cognitive-linguistic skills and reading and writing in Korean Hangul, Chinese Hanja, and English among Korean children. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 391–410). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Cormier, Pierre, & Kelson, Suzanne. (2000). The roles of phonological and syntactic awareness in the use of plural morphemes among children in French immersion [Special issue: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends, edited by Esther Geva & Ludo Verhoeven]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 267–293.
    • Cutting, Laurie E., & Denckla, Martha Bridge. (2001). The relationship of rapid serial naming and word reading in normally developing readers: An exploratory model. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 673–705.
    • Holopainen, Leena, Ahonen, Timo, Tolvanen, Asko, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2000). Two alternative ways to model the relation between reading accuracy and phonological awareness at preschool age. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 77–100.
    • Hooper, Stephen R., Costa, Lara-Jeane, McBee, Matthew, Anderson, Kathleen L., Yerby, Donna C., Knuth, Sean B., & Childress, Amy. (2011). Concurrent and longitudinal neuropsychological contributors to written language expression in first and second grade students [Special issue: Writing development from early to middle childhood, edited by Virgina W. Berninger, Brett Miller & Victoria J. Molfese]. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 221–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9263-x
    • Jasińska, Kaja K., Frost, Stephen, Molfese, Peter, Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, Rueckl, Jay, & Pugh, Ken. (2016). Neuroimaging perspectives on skilled and impaired reading and the bilingual experience. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_3
    • Jiménez, Juan E., García de la Cadena, Claudia, Siegel, Linda S., O'Shanahan, Isabel, García, Eduardo, & Rodríguez, Cristina. (2011). Gender ratio and cognitive profiles in dyslexia: A cross-national study. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 729–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9222-6
    • Klein, Raymond M. (2002). Observations on the temporal correlates of reading failure [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 207–232.
    • Leong, Che Kan, & Ho, Man Koon. (2008). The role of lexical knowledge and related linguistic components in typical and poor language comprehenders of Chinese. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9113-7
    • Logan, Jessica A. R., Schatschneider, Christopher, & Wagner, Richard K. (2011). Rapid serial naming and reading ability: The role of lexical access. Reading and Writing, 24(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9199-1
    • Mann, Virginia, & Wimmer, Heinz. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 653–682.
    • Morfidi, Eleni, van der Leij, Aryan, de Jong, Peter F., Scheltinga, Femke, & Bekebrede, Judith. (2007). Reading in two orthographies: A cross-linguistic study of Dutch average and poor readers who learn English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 753–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9035-9
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3180-4
    • Stringer, Ronald W., Toplak, Maggie E., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2004). Differential relationships between RAN performance, behaviour ratings, and executive function measures: Searching for a double dissociation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 891–914.
    • Wang, Hsiao-Lan Sharon, Huss, Martina, Hämäläinen, Jarmo A., & Goswami, Usha. (2012). Basic auditory processing and developmental dyslexia in Chinese. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 509–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9284-5
    • Wolf, Maryanne, O'Rourke, Alyssa Goldberg, Gidney, Calvin, Lovett, Maureen, Cirino, Paul, & Morris, Robin. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013816320290
    • Wolff, Peter H. (2002). Timing precision and rhythm in developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 179–206.
  • Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976a). Naming of objects by dyslexic and other learning disabled children. Brain and Language, 3, 1–15. Cited by18
    • Abouzeid, Mary P. (1992). Stages of word knowledge in reading disabled children. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 279–306). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A., Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Khateb, Asaid. (2017). What contributes to spelling in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218748
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2002). Asynchrony of visual-orthographic and auditory-phonological word recognition processes: An underlying factor in dyslexia [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 15–42.
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Cutting, Laurie E., & Denckla, Martha Bridge. (2001). The relationship of rapid serial naming and word reading in normally developing readers: An exploratory model. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 673–705.
    • Fricke, Silke, Szczerbinski, Marcin, Stackhouse, Joy, & Fox-Boyer, Annette V. (2008). Predicting individual differences in early literacy acquisition in German: The role of speech and language processing skills and letter knowledge [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 103–146. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.02fri
    • Frith, Uta. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). Hove; Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Grigorenko, Elena L., Naples, Adam, Chang, Joseph, Romano, Christina, Ngorosho, Damaris, Kungulilo, Selemani, Jukes, Matthew, & Bundy, Donald. (2007). Back to Africa: Tracing dyslexia genes in east Africa [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9017-y
    • Groth, Katarina, Lachmann, Thomas, Riecker, Axel, Muthmann, Irene, & Steinbrink, Claudia. (2011). Developmental dyslexics show deficits in the processing of temporal auditory information in German vowel length discrimination. Reading and Writing, 24(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9213-7
    • Lyytinen, Heikki, Aro, Mikko, Holopainen, Leena, Leiwo, Matti, Lyytinen, Paula, & Tolvanen, Asko. (2006). Children's language development and reading acquisition in a highly transparent orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 47–62). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Messbauer, Vera C. S., & de Jong, Peter F. (2006). Effects of visual and phonological distinctness on visual-verbal paired associate learning in Dutch dyslexic and normal readers. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 393–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5121-7
    • Post, Yolanda V., & Carreker, Suzanne. (2002). Orthographic similarity and phonological transparency in spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 317–340.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Roodenrys, Steven, & Stokes, Julie. (2001). Serial recall and nonword repetition in reading disabled children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 379–394.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3180-4
    • Stringer, Ronald W., Toplak, Maggie E., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2004). Differential relationships between RAN performance, behaviour ratings, and executive function measures: Searching for a double dissociation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 891–914.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Wolf, Maryanne, O'Rourke, Alyssa Goldberg, Gidney, Calvin, Lovett, Maureen, Cirino, Paul, & Morris, Robin. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013816320290
  • Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976b). Rapid automatized naming (R.A.N.): dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-0 Cited by41
    • Amtmann, Dagmar, Abbott, Robert D., & Berninger, V. W. (2007). Mixture growth models of RAN and RAS row by row: Insight into the reading system at work over time. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 785–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9041-y
    • Barr, Cathy L., & Couto, Jillian M. (2008). Molecular genetics of reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 255–281). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Breznitz, Zvia, Oren, Revital, & Shaul, Shelley. (2004). Brain activity of regular and dyslexic readers while reading Hebrew as compared to English sentences [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 707–737.
    • Caravolas, Markéta, & Samara, Anna. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 326–343). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, & da Silva, Juliane Ribeiro. (2010). Cognitive and language correlates of hyperlexia: Evidence from children with autism spectrum disorders. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9154-6
    • Chiappe, Penny, Stringer, Ron, Siegel, Linda S., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2002). Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 73–107.
    • Chik, Pakey Pui-man, Ho, Connie Suk-han, Yeung, Pui-sze, Chan, David Wai-ock, Chung, Kevin Kien-hoa, Luan, Hui, Lo, Lap-yan, & Lau, Wendy Suet-yee. (2012). Syntactic skills in sentence reading comprehension among Chinese elementary school children. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 679–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9293-4
    • Compton, Donald L. (2000). Modeling the growth of decoding skills in first-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(3), 219–259.
    • Conrad, Nicole J., & Levy, Betty Ann. (2007). Letter processing and the formation of memory representations in children with naming speed deficits. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9028-8
    • Elbeheri, Gad, & Everatt, John. (2007). Literacy ability and phonological processing skills amongst dyslexic and non-dyslexic speakers of Arabic. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9031-0
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Gautam, Seema, Everatt, John, Sadeghi, Amir, & McNeill, Brigid. (2019). Multiliteracy in akshara and alphabetic orthographies: The case of Punjabi, Hindi and English learners in primary schools in Punjab. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 139–160). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_8
    • Geva, Esther, Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Shany, Michal. (1997). Development of reading efficiency in first and second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_2
    • Hagtvet, Bente E. (2003). Listening comprehension and reading comprehension in poor decoders: Evidence for the importance of syntactic and semantic skills as well as phonological skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(6), 505–539.
    • Horowitz-Kraus, Tzipi. (2016). The role of executive functions in the reading process. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 51–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_4
    • Hudson, Roxanne F., Torgesen, Joseph K., Lane, Holly B., & Turner, Stephen J. (2012). Relations among reading skills and sub-skills and text-level reading proficiency in developing readers. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9283-6
    • Katzir, Tami, Shaul, Shelly, Bretnitz, Zvia, & Wolf, Maryanne. (2004). The universal and the unique in dyslexia: A cross-linguistic investigation of reading and reading fluency in Hebrew-and English-speaking children with reading disorders [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 739–768.
    • Khateb, Asaid, Taha, Haitham Y., Elias, Inas, & Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2013). The effect of the internal orthographic connectivity of written Arabic words on the process of the visual recognition: A comparison between skilled and dyslexic readers [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.834244
    • Khoury-Metanis, Afnan, Asadi, Ibrahim A., & Khateb, Asaid. (2018). The contribution of basic linguistic skills to handwriting among fifth-grade Arabic-speaking children. Writing Systems Research, 10(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2018.1540375
    • Landerl, Karin, & Thaler, Verena. (2006). Reading and spelling acquisition and dyslexia in German. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 121–134). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Leinonen, Seija, Müller, Kurt, Leppänen, Paavo H. T., Aro, Mikko, Ahonen, Timo, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2001). Heterogeneity in adult dyslexic readers: Relating processing skills to the speed and accuracy of oral text reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 265–296.
    • Lipka, Orly, & Siegel, Linda S. (2010). Early identification and intervention to prevent reading difficulties. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 205–219). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_15
    • Nag, Sonali, & Snowling, Margaret J. (2011a). Cognitive profiles of poor readers of Kannada [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9258-7
    • Olson, Richard K. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on word-reading skills. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 233–253). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Pennington, Bruce F., Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, Green, Phyllis A., & Lefly, Dianne L. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 707–755.
    • Perfetti, Charles, & Harris, Lindsay. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in English. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 25–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.002
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Sadeghi, Amir, Everatt, John, & McNeill, Brigid. (2016). A simple model of Persian reading. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.1003768
    • Scheerer-Neumann, Gerheid. (1996b). Störungen des Erwerbs der Schriftlichkeit bei alphabetischen Schriftsystemen [Disorders in written language acquisition]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1329–1351). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Leikin, Mark, & Share, David L. (2005). Bi-literate bilingualism versus mono-literate bilingualism: A longitudinal study of reading acquisition in Hebrew (L2) among Russian-speaking (L1) children [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 179–206.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Share, David L., Leikin, Mark, & Kozminsky, Ely. (2008). On the benefits of bi-literacy: Just a head start in reading or specific orthographic insights? Reading and Writing, 21(9), 905–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9097-3
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Stringer, Ronald W., Toplak, Maggie E., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2004). Differential relationships between RAN performance, behaviour ratings, and executive function measures: Searching for a double dissociation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 891–914.
    • Sucena, Ana, Castro, São Luís, & Seymour, Philip. (2009). Developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth: The case of European Portuguese [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9156-4
    • Vellutino, Frank R., Scanlon, Donna M., Zhang, Haiyan, & Schatschneider, Christopher. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties [Special issue: Recent developments in reading intervention research, edited by William E. Tunmer]. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 437–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9098-2
    • Wagner, Richard K., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192
    • Wimmer, Heinz, Landerl, Karin, & Frith, Uta. (1999). Learning to read German: normal and impaired acquisition. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 34–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Wolf, Maryanne, O'Rourke, Alyssa Goldberg, Gidney, Calvin, Lovett, Maureen, Cirino, Paul, & Morris, Robin. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013816320290
    • Zadeh, Zohreh Yaghoub, Farnia, Fataneh, & Geva, Esther. (2012). Toward modeling reading comprehension and reading fluency in English language learners. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9252-0
  • Dengel, Andreas, & Shafait, Faisal. (2014). Analysis of the logical layout of documents. In David Doermann & Karl Tombre (Eds.), Handbook of document image processing and recognition (pp. 177–222). London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-859-1_6
  • Denton, Carolyn A., Swanson, Elizabeth A., & Mathes, Patricia G. (2007). Assessment-based instructional coaching provided to reading intervention teachers. Reading and Writing, 20(6), 569–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9055-0
  • Depau, Giovanni. (2012). How graffiti provide evidence on the relationship between writing, orality, and identity [Special issue: The writing system at play, edited by Vivian Cook, Benedetta Bassetti, & Jyotsna Vaid]. Writing Systems Research, 4, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.658163
  • Derolez, A. (2003). The palaeography of Gothic manuscript books from the twelfth to the early sixteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by4
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Dane, Joseph A. (2012). Out of sorts: On typography and modern theories of print culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Roberts, Jane. (2015). Guide to scripts used in English writings up to 1500 (Revised edition) (Exeter Medieval Texts and Studies). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
    • Voeste, Anja. (2012). The emergence of suprasegmental spellings in German. In Susan Baddeley & Anja Voeste (Eds.), Orthographies in Early Modern Europe (pp. 167–191). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Derolez, René (1954). Runica Manuscripta: The English tradition. Brugge: De Tempel. Cited by5
    • Antonsen, Elmer H. (1989). The runes: The earliest Germanic writing system. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 137–158). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    • Antonsen, Elmer H. (2002). Runes and Germanic linguistics (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and monographs 140). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    • Elliott, Ralph W. V. (1996). The Runic script. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 333–339). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Lehmann, Ruth P. M. (1989). Ogham: The ancient script of the Celts. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 159–170). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    • Roberts, Jane. (2015). Guide to scripts used in English writings up to 1500 (Revised edition) (Exeter Medieval Texts and Studies). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
  • Derrida, Jacques. (1967). De la grammatologie. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit. [1976, Of grammatology (Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins Press; 1998, Corrected edition] Cited by27
    • Bachner, Andrea. (2014). Beyond Sinology: Chinese writing and the scripts of culture (Global Chinese Culture). New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Bodel, John, & Houston, Stephen (Eds.). (2021). The hidden language of graphic signs: Cryptic writing and meaningful marks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886505
    • Bolter, Jay David. (1991). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [2001, Second edition]
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Brockmeier, Jens, & Olson, David R. (2009). The literacy episteme: From Innis to Derrida. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 3–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Dichy, Joseph. (2017). The analytics of writing, exemplified by Arabic, the youngest of the Semitic scripts. In Manuel Sartori, Manuela E. B. Giolfo, & Philippe Cassuto (Eds), Approaches to the history and dialectology of Arabic in honor of Pierre Larcher (Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics 88) (pp. 29–56). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Hagège, Claude. (1988). Writing: The invention and the dream. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 72–83). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Haralambous, Yannis. (2007). Fonts & encodings: From Unicode to advanced typography and everything in between (translated by P. Scott Horne). Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
    • Harris, Roy. (2000). Rethinking writing. London; New York: Continuum.
    • Koch, Peter, & Oesterreicher, Wulf. (1994). Schriftlichkeit und Sprache [Writing and language]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 587–604). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Linell, Per. (1982). The written language bias in linguistics (Studies in Comrnunication 2). Linköping: Linköping University.
    • Linell, Per. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations (Routledge Advances in Communication and Linguistic Theory). London; New York: Routledge.
    • McDonald, Edward. (2016). The “ideograph” and the 漢字 hànzì: A cross-cultural concept with two mutually invisible faces. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 13(2), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.00016.mcd
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2018). What is natural in writing? Prolegomena to a Natural Grapholinguistics [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00010.mel
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Mignolo, Walter D. (1994b). Afterword: Writing and recorded knowledge in colonial and postcolonial situations. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 292–313). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Mikulska, Katarzyna. (2019a). Introduction: Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach [translation by Jerome A. Offner]. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 3–22). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c000b
    • Mikulska, Katarzyna. (2019b). The system of graphic communication in the Central Mexican divinatory codices from the functional perspective [translation by Jerome A. Offner]. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 41–92). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c002
    • Neef, Sonja. (2008) Abdruck und Spur: Handschrift im Zeitalter ihrer technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos. [English translation: Mathews, Anthony (Translator). (2011). Imprint and trace: Handwriting in the age of technology. London: Reaktion Books]
    • Presutti, Stefano. (2021a). The interdependence between speech and writing. Towards a greater awareness. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 83–101). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-prea
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
    • Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte. (1994). Geschichte der Reflexion über Schrift und Schriftlichkeit [History of the reflection on writing and its use]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig, (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 102–121). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110111293.1.2.102
    • Sirat, Colette. (1994). Handwriting and the writing hand. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 375–460). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Watt, W. C. (1994c). Part II. Writing systems: Introduction. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 89–114). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Derrida, Jacques. (1976). Of grammatology (Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins Press. [1967, De la grammatologie. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit; 1998, Corrected edition] Cited by31
    • Bolter, Jay David. (1991). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [2001, Second edition]
    • Boone, Elizabeth Hill. (1994a). Introduction: Writing and recorded knowledge. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 3–26). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Brockmeier, Jens, & Olson, David R. (2009). The literacy episteme: From Innis to Derrida. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 3–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Danesi, Marcel. (2017). The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet (Bloomsbury Advances in Semiotics). London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2006). On beyond alphabets [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.03dan
    • Davidson, Andrew. (2019). Writing: The re-construction of language. Language Sciences, 72, 134–149. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.09.004
    • Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. (2011). Divine art, infernal machine: The reception of printing in the West from first impressions to the sense of an ending (Material Texts). Philadelphia, PE; Oxford: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Elti di Rodeano, Sveva. (2021). Scripts in contact: Transmission of the first alphabets. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 223–239). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-rode
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Gu, Ming Dong. (2000). Reconceptualizing the linguistic divide: Chinese and Western theories of the written sign. Comparative Literature Studies, 37(2), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1353/cls.2000.0012
    • Hamann, Byron. (2004). Seeing and the Mixtec screenfolds. Visible Language, 38(1), 67–124.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Jacobowitz, Seth. (2015). Writing technology in Meiji Japan: A media history of modern Japanese literature and visual culture (Harvard East Asian Monographs 387). Cambridge MA; London: Harvard University Asia Center.
    • McDonald, Edward. (2016). The “ideograph” and the 漢字 hànzì: A cross-cultural concept with two mutually invisible faces. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 13(2), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.00016.mcd
    • Mignolo, Walter D. (1994b). Afterword: Writing and recorded knowledge in colonial and postcolonial situations. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 292–313). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Mullaney, Thomas S. (2017). The Chinese typewriter: A history. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Neef, Sonja. (2008) Abdruck und Spur: Handschrift im Zeitalter ihrer technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos. [English translation: Mathews, Anthony (Translator). (2011). Imprint and trace: Handwriting in the age of technology. London: Reaktion Books]
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2009c). Why literacy matters, then and now. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 385–403). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Olson, David R., & Torrance, Nancy. (2009). Preface. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. xiii-xxi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Ravid, Dorit Diskin. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling (Literacy Studies 3). New York: Springer.
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [1987, Reprinted with corrections; 2015, Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing]
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2016b). Writing systems: Methods for recording language. In Keith Allan (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics (pp. 47–61). London; New York, NY: Routledge.
    • Schaper, Joachim. (2015). Hebrew culture at the “interface between the written and the oral”. In Brian B. Schmidt (Ed.), Contextualizing Israel's sacred writing: Ancient literacy, orality, and literary production (Ancient Israel and Its Literature 22) (pp. 323–340). Atlanta, GA: SBL Press.
    • Scheible, Jeff. (2015). Digital shift: The cultural logic of punctuation. Minneapolis, MN; London: University of Minnesota Press.
    • Street, Brian V., & Lefstein, Adam. (2007). Literacy: An advanced resource book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
  • Derrida, Jacques. (1976). Of grammatology (Corrected edition) (Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins Press. [1967, De la grammatologie. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit; 1976, First edition] Cited by2
    • Dufresne, Therese, & Masny, Diana. (2005). Different and differing views on conceptualising writing system research and education. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (375–397). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • O'Neill, Timothy Michael. (2016). Ideography and Chinese language theory: A history (Welten Ostasiens - Worlds of East Asia - Mondes de l'Extrême Orient 26). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Derwing, Bruce L. (1992). Orthographic aspects of linguistic competence. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 193–210). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Cited by7
    • Bassetti, Benedetta. (2006). Orthographic input and phonological representations in learners of Chinese as a foreign language [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 95–114.
    • Cook, Vivian. (2004). The English writing system. (The English Language series). London Hodder Arnold. [2014, reprinted, London: New York: Routledge]
    • Cook, Vivian. (2005). Written language and foreign language teaching. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 424–441). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Ravid, Dorit. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: Phonological and morphological factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011192806656
    • Ravid, Dorit Diskin. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling (Literacy Studies 3). New York: Springer.
  • Derwing, B. L., Smith, M. L., & Wiebe, G. E. (1995). On the role of spelling in morpheme recognition: Experimental studies with children and adults. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 3–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cited by7
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, & Dhooge, Sarah. (2010). Developmental stability and changes in the impact of root consistency on children's spelling. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1055–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9195-5
    • Kemp, Nenagh. (2006). Children's spelling of base, inflected, and derived words: Links with morphological awareness [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 737–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9001-6
    • Leong, Che Kan. (2000b). Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words and grades 4, 5 and 6 children's spelling [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 277–302.
    • Nunes, Terezinha, Bryant, Peter, & Bindman, Miriam. (1997a). Learning to spell regular and irregular verbs [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007951213624
    • Ravid, Dorit, & Bar-On, Amalia. (2005). Manipulating written Hebrew roots across development: The interface of semantic, phonological and orthographic factors [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-1802-5
    • Tsesmeli, Styliani N., & Seymour, Philip H. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 587–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9011-4
    • Walker, Joanne, & Hauerwas, Laura Boynton. (2006). Development of phonological, morphological, and orthographic knowledge in young spellers: The case of inflected verbs. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 819–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9006-1
  • Desberg, Peter, Elliott, Dale E., & Marsh, George. (1980). American Black English and spelling. In Uta Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 69–82). London; New York: Academic Press. Cited by1
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
  • Desbordes, Françoise. (1990). Idées romaines sur l'écriture. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille. Cited by10
    • Erfurt, Jürgen. (1996). Sprachwandel und Schriftlichkeit [Language change and writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1387–1404). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1984). A history of writing. London: British Library. [1987, Second edition; 1992, Third revised edition, London: British Library; New York: Abbeville Press]
    • Günther, Hartmut. (1996b). Schrift als Zahlen- und Ordnungssystem - alphabetisches Sortieren [Writing as a numbering and ordering system]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1568–1583). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Harris, Roy. (2000). Rethinking writing. London; New York: Continuum.
    • Harris, Roy. (2009). Speech and writing. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 46–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609664.004
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Voeste, Anja. (2015). Proficiency and efficiency: Why German spelling changed in Early Modern times [Special issue: The historical sociolinguistics of spelling, edited by Laura Villa & Rik Vosters]. Written Language & Literacy, 18(2), 248–259. doi 10.1075/wll.18.2.04voe
    • Vogt-Spira, Gregor. (1994). Die lateinische Schriftkultur der Antike [The Roman literate culture of antiquity]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 517–524). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Werner, Shirley. (2009). Literacy studies in classics: The last twenty years. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 333–382). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Desbordes, Françoise. (1997). The notion of orthography: A Latin inheritance. In Clotilde Pontecorvo (Ed.), Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6) (pp. 117–128). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. Cited by1
    • Joyce, Terry, & Masuda, Hisashi. (2019). On the notions of graphematic representation and orthography from the perspective of the Japanese writing system [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00028.joy
  • Deutsch, A. (1994). Operating of attention systems in the field of the syntax in children with severe reading disabilities. Unpublished doctoral thesis [in Hebrew]. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University. Cited by7
    • Kahn-Horwitz, Janina, Kuash, Sara, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Schwartz, Mila. (2014). How do previously acquired languages affect acquisition of English as a foreign language: The case of Circassian [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.03kah
    • Leikin, Mark, & Assayag-Bouskila, Orit. (2004). Expression of syntactic complexity in sentence comprehension: A comparison between dyslexic and regular readers [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 801–821.
    • Leikin, Mark, Schwartz, Mila, & Share, David L. (2010). General and specific benefits of bi-literate bilingualism: A Russian–Hebrew study of beginning literacy [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9210-x
    • Leikin, Mark, Share, David L., & Schwartz, Mila. (2005). Difficulties in L2 Hebrew reading in Russian-speaking second graders. Reading and Writing, 18(59, 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-8919-4
    • Schwartz, Mila, Geva, Esther, Share, David L., & Leikin, Mark. (2007). Learning to read in English as third language: The cross-linguistic transfer of phonological processing skills. Written Language & Literacy, 10(1), 25–52.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Leikin, Mark, & Share, David L. (2005). Bi-literate bilingualism versus mono-literate bilingualism: A longitudinal study of reading acquisition in Hebrew (L2) among Russian-speaking (L1) children [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 179–206.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Share, David L., Leikin, Mark, & Kozminsky, Ely. (2008). On the benefits of bi-literacy: Just a head start in reading or specific orthographic insights? Reading and Writing, 21(9), 905–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9097-3
  • Deutsch, A., & Bentin, S. (1996). Attention factors mediating syntactic deficiency in reading-disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 386–415. Cited by7
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, Share, David, & Mansour, Maysaloon Said. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(5), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024237415143
    • Chik, Pakey Pui-man, Ho, Connie Suk-han, Yeung, Pui-sze, Chan, David Wai-ock, Chung, Kevin Kien-hoa, Luan, Hui, Lo, Lap-yan, & Lau, Wendy Suet-yee. (2012). Syntactic skills in sentence reading comprehension among Chinese elementary school children. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 679–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9293-4
    • Lefrançois, Pascale, & Armand, Françoise. (2003). The role of phonological and syntactic awareness in second-language reading: The case of Spanish-speaking learners of French. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 219–246.
    • Leikin, Mark, & Assayag-Bouskila, Orit. (2004). Expression of syntactic complexity in sentence comprehension: A comparison between dyslexic and regular readers [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 801–821.
    • Mimran, R. Cohen. (2006). Reading disabilities among Hebrew-speaking children in upper elementary grades: The role of phonological and nonphonological language skills. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5461-3
    • Schiff, Rachel, Raveh, Michal, & Kahta, Shani. (2008). The developing mental lexicon: Evidence from morphological priming of irregular Hebrew forms. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9088-4
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
  • Deutsch, A., Frost, R., & Forster, K. I. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1238–1255. Cited by9
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Basnight-Brown, Dana M. (2008). The role of morphology in visual word recognition: Graded semantic influences due to competing senses and semantic richness of the stem. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 85–106). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Ko, In Yeong. (2018). The time course of activation of semantic and orthographic information in morphological decomposition by Korean adults and developing readers. Frontiers in Communication, 3:51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00051
    • Mimran, R. Cohen. (2006). Reading disabilities among Hebrew-speaking children in upper elementary grades: The role of phonological and nonphonological language skills. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5461-3
    • Pollatsek, Alexander, & Hyönä, Jukka. (2006). Processing of morphemically complex words in context: What can be learned from eye movements. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 275–298). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Ravid, Dorit, & Schiff, Rachel. (2006). Roots and patterns in Hebrew language development: Evidence from written morphological analogies. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 789–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9004-3
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Schiff, Rachel. (2003). The effects of morphology and word length on the reading of Hebrew nominals. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 263–287.
    • Schiff, Rachel, Raveh, Michal, & Kahta, Shani. (2008). The developing mental lexicon: Evidence from morphological priming of irregular Hebrew forms. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9088-4
  • Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Peleg, S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 415–422. Cited by10
    • Ashby, Jane. (2016). Why does prosody accompany fluency? Re-conceptualizing the role of phonology in reading. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 65–89). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_5
    • Carreiras, Manuel, Armstrong, Blair C., Perea, Manuel, & Frost, Ram. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005
    • Cutter, Michael G., Drieghe, Denis, & Liversedge, Simon P. (2015). How is information integrated across fixations in reading? In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 245–260). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Hansen, Gunna Funder. (2014). Word recognition in Arabic: Approaching a language-specific reading model. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 55–76). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2012). Eye movements and word recognition during reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 73–101). London: Psychology Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2000). Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119670 Cited by11
    • Cutter, Michael G., Drieghe, Denis, & Liversedge, Simon P. (2015). How is information integrated across fixations in reading? In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 245–260). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Friedmann, Naama, & Haddad-Hanna, Manar. (2014). Types of Developmental Dyslexia in Arabic. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 119–151). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Hansen, Gunna Funder. (2014). Word recognition in Arabic: Approaching a language-specific reading model. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 55–76). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2012). Eye movements and word recognition during reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 73–101). London: Psychology Press.
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2015). The work of the eyes during reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 44–59). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Shechter, Ady, Lipka, Orly, & Katzir, Tami. (2018). Predictive models of word reading fluency in Hebrew. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:1882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01882
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2005). Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 341–371. Cited by9
    • Ashby, Jane. (2016). Why does prosody accompany fluency? Re-conceptualizing the role of phonology in reading. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 65–89). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_5
    • Carreiras, Manuel, Armstrong, Blair C., Perea, Manuel, & Frost, Ram. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005
    • Cutter, Michael G., Drieghe, Denis, & Liversedge, Simon P. (2015). How is information integrated across fixations in reading? In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 245–260). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Hansen, Gunna Funder. (2014). Word recognition in Arabic: Approaching a language-specific reading model. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 55–76). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2012). Eye movements and word recognition during reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 73–101). London: Psychology Press.
  • Deutsch, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Initial fixation location effects in reading Hebrew words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 393–421. Cited by10
    • Albrengues, Claire, Lavigne, Frédéric, Aguilar, Carlos, Castet, Eric, & Vitu, Françoise. (2019). Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eyemovement control during reading. PLOS ONE, 14(7), e0219666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219666
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2004). Introduction on regular and impaired reading in semitic languages [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 645–649.
    • Breznitz, Zvia, Oren, Revital, & Shaul, Shelley. (2004). Brain activity of regular and dyslexic readers while reading Hebrew as compared to English sentences [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 707–737.
    • Katzir, Tami, Shaul, Shelly, Bretnitz, Zvia, & Wolf, Maryanne. (2004). The universal and the unique in dyslexia: A cross-linguistic investigation of reading and reading fluency in Hebrew-and English-speaking children with reading disorders [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 739–768.
    • Li, Xingshan, Zang, Chuanli, Liversedge, Simon P., & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2015). The role of words in Chinese reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 232–244). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Nazir, Tatjana A., & Huckauf, Anke. (2008). The visual skill “reading”. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 25–42). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Shillcock, Richard. (2007). Eye movements and visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Deutsch, R., & Heltzer, M. (1997). Windows to the past. Tel Aviv–Jaffa: Archaeological Center. Cited by5
    • Herr, Larry G. (2014b). Hebrew, Moabite, and Edomite seal scripts. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 187–201). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Lemarie, André. (2014a). A history of Northwest Semitic epigraphy. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 5–29). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Lemarie, André. (2015). Levantine literacy ca. 1000–750 BCE. In Brian B. Schmidt (Ed.), Contextualizing Israel's sacred writing: Ancient literacy, orality, and literary production (Ancient Israel and Its Literature 22) (pp. 11–45). Atlanta, GA: SBL Press.
    • Schmitz, Philip C. (2014). Phoenician seal script. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 141–174). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Vanderhooft, David S. (2014). Iron Age Moabite, Hebrew, and Edomite monumental scripts. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 107–126). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
  • Deutsch, R., & Lemaire, A. (2000). Biblical period personal seals in the Shlomo Moussaieff Collection. Tel Aviv: Archaeological Center. Cited by7
    • Bordreuil, Pierre. (2014). On the authenticity of Iron Age Northwest Semitic inscribed seals. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 127–140). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Hamilton, Gordon J. (2014b). Paleo-Hebrew texts and scripts of the Persian period. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 253–290). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Herr, Larry G. (2014a). Aramaic and Ammonite seal scripts. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 175–186). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Herr, Larry G. (2014b). Hebrew, Moabite, and Edomite seal scripts. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 187–201). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Lemarie, André. (2014a). A history of Northwest Semitic epigraphy. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 5–29). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Schmitz, Philip C. (2014). Phoenician seal script. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 141–174). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Vanderhooft, David S. (2014). Iron Age Moabite, Hebrew, and Edomite monumental scripts. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 107–126). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
  • Devitt, A. (2004). Writing genres. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. Cited by5
    • Andersen, Jack, Bazerman, Charles, & Schneider, Jesper. (2014). Beyond single genres: Pattern mapping in global communication. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 305–322). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Berkenkotter, Carol, & Luginbühl, Martin. (2014). Producing genres: Pattern variation and genre development. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 285–304). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Devitt, Amy, & Reiff, Mary Jo. (2014). Reproducing genres: Pattern-related writing. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 263–284). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Lillis, Theresa. (2013). The sociolinguistics of writing (Edinburgh Sociolinguistics). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    • Prior, Paul, & Thorne, Steven L. (2014). Research paradigms: Beyond product, process, and social activity. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 31–54). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Devitt, Amy, & Reiff, Mary Jo. (2014). Reproducing genres: Pattern-related writing. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 263–284). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Dewey, G. (1971). English spelling: Roadblock to reading. New York: Teachers College Press. Cited by10
    • Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & de Groot, Annette M. B. (2002). Beyond the rime: Measuring the consistency of monosyllabic and polysyallabic words. In Martin Neef, Anneke Neijt, & Richard Sproat (Eds.), The relation of writing to spoken language (Linguistische Arbeiten, 460) (pp. 49–69). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
    • Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Hellwig, Frauke M., & de Groot, Annette M. B. (2004). Word-initial entropy in five languages: Letter to sound, and sound to letter. [Special issue: From letter to sound, edited by Martin Neef & Beatrice Primus]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(2), 165–184.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Glushko, Robert J. (1981). Principles for pronouncing print: The psychology of phonography. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 61–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Hagtvet, Bente E., Helland, Turid, & Lyster, Solveig-Alma H. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Norwegian. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 15–29). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Tauli, Valter. (1977). Speech and spelling. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 17–35). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2016). Processing the written word. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 453–469). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Yule, Valerie, & Ishi, Yasuko. (2016). Spelling reform. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 413–427). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Dhorme, Édouard. (1930). Un nouvel alphabet sémitique. Revue Biblique, 39, 571–577. Cited by4
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996d). Methods of decipherment. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 141–159). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2020). The decipherment of ancient Near Eastern languages. In Rebecca Hasselbach-Andee (Ed.), A companion to ancient Near Eastern languages (pp. 3–25). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Pope, Maurice. (1975). The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphics to Linear B. London: Thames & Hudson: New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. [1999, Revised edition, The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphs to Maya script. London; New York: Thames & Hudson]
    • Segert, Stanislav. (1983). Decipherment of forgotten writing systems: Two different approaches. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 131–156). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
  • Dhorme, Édouard. (1946). Déchiffrement des inscriptions pseudo-hiéroglyphiques de Byblos. Syria, 25, 1–35. Cited by5
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996c). The first civilization. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 21–32). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Koller, Aaron. (2018). The diffusion of the alphabet in the second millennium BCE: On the movements of scribal ideas from Egypt to the Levant, Mesopotamia, and Yemen. Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections, 20, 1–14.
  • Diakonoff, Igor M. (1983). Some reflections on numerals in Sumerian towards a history of mathematical speculations. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 103(1), 83–93. Cited by5
    • Jasim, Sabah Abboud, & Oates, Joan. (1986). Early tokens and tablets in Mesopotamia: New information from Tell Abada and Tell Brak. World Archaeology, 17(3), 348–362.
    • Krispijn, Theo J. H. (2012). Writing Semitic with cuneiform script. The interaction of Sumerian and Akkadian orthography in the second half of the third millennium BC. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 181–218). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. (1984). Before numerals. Visible Language, 18(1), 48–60.
    • Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. (1992). Before writing [Two volumes: Volume 1. From counting to cuneiform; Volume 2. A catalog of near eastern tokens]. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    • Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. (1994a). Forerunners of writing. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 264–268). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Dibble, Charles E. (1971). Writing in Central Mexico. In Robert Wauchope, Gordon Ekholm, & Ignacio Bernal (Eds.), Handbook of middle American Indians: Volume 10 (pp. 322–332). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. Cited by5
    • Boone, Elizabeth Hill. (1994a). Introduction: Writing and recorded knowledge. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 3–26). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Grube, Nikolai. (1994a). Mittelamerikanische Schriften [Central American scripts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 405–415). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen, Baines, John, & Cooper, Jerrold. (2003). Last writing: Script obsolescence in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Mesoamerica. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45(3), 430–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417503000227
    • Mikulska, Katarzyna. (2019a). Introduction: Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach [translation by Jerome A. Offner]. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 3–22). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c000b
  • Dich, Nadya. (2010). Development of sensitivity to phonological context in learning to spell in English: Evidence from Russian ESL speakers. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.04dic
  • Dichy, Joseph. (2017). The analytics of writing, exemplified by Arabic, the youngest of the Semitic scripts. In Manuel Sartori, Manuela E. B. Giolfo, & Philippe Cassuto (Eds), Approaches to the history and dialectology of Arabic in honor of Pierre Larcher (Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics 88) (pp. 29–56). Leiden; Boston: Brill. Cited by1
    • Dichy, Joseph. (2019). On the writing system of Arabic: The semiographic principle as reflected in Nasḫī letter shapes. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 257–268). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-dich
  • Dichy, Joseph. (2019). On the writing system of Arabic: The semiographic principle as reflected in Nasḫī letter shapes. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 257–268). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-dich Cited by1
    • Haralambous, Yannis, & Dürst, Martin. (2019). Unicode from a linguistic point of view. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 127–166). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-hara1
  • Dickinson, D. K., McCabe, A., Anastasopoulos, L., Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., & Poe, M. D. (2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy: The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge among preschool-aged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.465 Cited by6
    • Blair, Rebecca, & Savage, Robert. (2006). Name writing but not environmental print recognition is related to letter-sound knowledge and phonological awareness in pre-readers. Reading and Writing, 19(9), 991–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9027-9
    • Linebarger, Deborah, Piotrowski, Jessica Taylor, & Greenwood, Charles R. (2010). On-screen print: The role of captions as a supplemental literacy tool. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01407.x
    • Reese, Elaine, Suggate, Sebastian, Long, Jennifer, & Schaughency, Elizabeth. (2010). Children's oral narrative and reading skills in the first 3 years of reading instruction. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9175-9
    • Shanya, Michal, Geva, Esther, & Melech-Feder, Liat. (2010). Emergent literacy in children of immigrants coming from a primarily oral literacy culture. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 24–60. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.02sha
    • Vadasy, Patricia F., & Sanders, Elizabeth A. (2008). Code-oriented instruction for kindergarten students at risk for reading difficulties: A replication and comparison of instructional groupings. Reading and Writing, 21(9), 929–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9119-9
    • Vaughn, Sharon, & Hall, Colby. (2017). Theoretically guided interventions for adolescents who are poor readers. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 489–506). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Dickinson, D. K., McCabe, A., Clark-Chiarelli, N., & Wolf, A. (2004). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness in low-income Spanish and English bilingual preschool children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 323–347. Cited by5
    • Baker, Doris Luft, Park, Yonghan, & Baker, Scott K. (2012). The reading performance of English learners in grades 1-3: The role of initial status and growth on reading fluency in Spanish and English. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9261-z
    • Kang, Jennifer Yusun. (2012). Do bilingual children possess better phonological awareness? Investigation of Korean monolingual and Korean-English bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9277-4
    • Raynolds, Laura B., & Uhry, Joanna K. (2010). The invented spellings of non-Spanish phonemes by Spanish–English bilingual and English monolingual kindergarteners. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9169-7
    • Rolla San Francisco, Andrea, Mo, Elaine, Carlo, María, August, Diane, & Snow, Catherine. (2006). The influences of language of literacy instruction and vocabulary on the spelling of Spanish–English bilinguals. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9012-3
    • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, Esther. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
  • Dickinson, D. K., & Smith, M. W. (1994). Long-term effects of preschool teachers' book readings on low-income children's vocabulary and story comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 104–122. Cited by6
    • Aram, Dorit. (2006). Early literacy interventions: The relative roles of storybook reading, alphabetic activities, and their combination. Reading and Writing, 19(5), 489–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9005-2
    • Assel, Michael Andrew, Landry, Susan H., Swank, Paul R., & Gunnewig, Susan. (2007). An evaluation of curriculum, setting, and mentoring on the performance of children enrolled in pre-kindergarten. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 463–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9039-5
    • Corrigan, Roberta. (2011). Effects of pre-service teachers' receptive vocabulary knowledge on their interactive read-alouds with elementary school students. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 749–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9223-5
    • Cunningham, Anne, Zibulsky, Jamie, & Callahan, Mia D. (2009). Starting small: Building preschool teacher knowledge that supports early literacy development [Special issue: Perspectives on teachers' disciplinary knowledge of reading processes, development, and pedagogy, edited by Anne Cunningham & Jamie Zibulsky]. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9164-z
    • McGuinness, Diane. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Morrison, Frederick J., Connor, Carol MacDonald, & Hindman, Annemarie. (2010). Early schooling and growth of literacy in the transition to school. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 153–164). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_11
  • Dickinson, D. K., & Snow, C. E. (1987). Interrelationships among prereading and oral language skills in kindergarteners from two social classes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2, 1–25. Cited by6
    • Burgess, Stephen R. (2002). The influence of speech perception, oral language ability, the home literacy environment, and pre-reading knowledge on the growth of phonological sensitivity: A one-year longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 709–737.
    • Evans, Mary Ann, Bell, Michelle, Shaw, Deborah, Moretti, Shelley, & Page, Jodi. (2006). Letter names, letter sounds and phonological awareness: An examination of kindergarten children across letters and of letters across children. Reading and Writing, 19(9), 959–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9026-x
    • Hecht, Steven A., Burgess, Stephen R., Torgesen, Joseph K., Wagner, Richard K., & Rashotte, Carol A. (2000). Explaining social class differences in growth of reading skills from beginning kindergarten through fourth-grade: The role of phonological awareness, rate of access, and print knowledge. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 99–127.
    • Levin, Iris, & Aram, Dorit. (2012). Mother-child joint writing and storybook reading and their effects on children's literacy: An intervention study. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 217–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9254-y
    • Lundberg, Ingvar, Larsman, Pernilla, & Strid, Anna. (2012). Development of phonological awareness during the preschool year: The influence of gender and socio-economic status. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9269-4
    • Min, Lanbin, & Zhou, Jing. (2018). A comparative study of visual fixation of Uygur and Han 5- to 6-year-olds in reading picture books within a Chinese reading context: Evidence from eye movement. Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, 2(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/2513850217752490
  • Dickinson, D. K., & Tabors, P. O. (Eds.). (2001). Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning at home and school. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing. Cited by7
    • Connor, Carol McDonald, & Morrison, Frederick J. (2017). Child characteristics by instruction interactions, literacy, and implications for theory and practice. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 507–524). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Corrigan, Roberta. (2011). Effects of pre-service teachers' receptive vocabulary knowledge on their interactive read-alouds with elementary school students. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 749–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9223-5
    • Cunningham, Anne, Zibulsky, Jamie, & Callahan, Mia D. (2009). Starting small: Building preschool teacher knowledge that supports early literacy development [Special issue: Perspectives on teachers' disciplinary knowledge of reading processes, development, and pedagogy, edited by Anne Cunningham & Jamie Zibulsky]. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9164-z
    • Kim, Young-Suk. (2009c). The relationship between home literacy practices and developmental trajectories of emergent literacy and conventional literacy skills for Korean children. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9103-9
    • Min, Lanbin, & Zhou, Jing. (2018). A comparative study of visual fixation of Uygur and Han 5- to 6-year-olds in reading picture books within a Chinese reading context: Evidence from eye movement. Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, 2(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/2513850217752490
    • Reese, Elaine, Suggate, Sebastian, Long, Jennifer, & Schaughency, Elizabeth. (2010). Children's oral narrative and reading skills in the first 3 years of reading instruction. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9175-9
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Diem, Werner. (1974). Hochsprache und Dialekt in Arabischen: Untersuchungen zur heutigen arabischen Zewisprachigkeit Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes XLI, 1). Wiesbaden: Steiner. [2006, second edition, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz] Cited by5
    • Bauer, Thomas. (1996c). Die schriftliche Sprache im Arabischen [Written language: Arabic]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1483–1490). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Biesterfeldt, H. H. (1996). Lese- und Schreibunterricht im arabischen Sprachraum [The teaching of reading and writing in the Arabic-speaking world]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1299–1309). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Glück, Helmut. (1994). Schriften im Kontakt [Writing systems in contact]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 745–766). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Mejdell, Gunvor. (2017). Changing norms, concepts and practices of written Arabic: A ‘long distance’ perspective. In Jacob Høigilt & Gunvor Mejdell (Eds.), The politics of written language in the Arab world: Writing change (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 90) (pp. 68–89). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Rosenhouse, Judith. (2014). Literacy acquisition and diglossia: Textbooks in Israeli Arabic-speaking schools. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 255–278). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Diem, Werner. (2006). Hochsprache und Dialekt in Arabischen: Untersuchungen zur heutigen arabischen Zewisprachigkeit (Second edition) (Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes XLI, 1). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. [1974, First edition, Wiesbaden: Steiner] Cited by1
    • Wagner, Esther-Miriam. (2013). Challenges of multiglossia: Scribes and the emergence of substandard Judaeo-Arabic registers. In Esther-Miriam Wagner, Ben Outhwaite, & Bettina Beinhoff (Eds.), Scribes as agents of language change (Studies in Language Change 10) (pp. 261–275). Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003 Cited by5
    • Casalis, Séverine, Commissaire, Eva, & Duncan, Lynne G. (2015). Sensitivity to morpheme units in English as L2 word recognition [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.976165
    • de Zeeuw, Marlies, Schreuder, Robert, & Verhoeven, Ludo T. W. (2015). Lexical processing of nominal compounds in first- and second-language learners across primary grades [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.926806
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, Milin, Petar, Cho, Kit W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, & O'Connor, Patrick A. (2015). Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00111
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Katherine. (2012). Morphological processing: A comparison of graded and categorical accounts. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–22). London: Psychology Press.
    • Ko, In Yeong, & Wang, Min. (2015). Reading compound words by adult Korean-English bilinguals [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.981495
  • Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2005). Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unraveling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 75–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000197 Cited by7
    • Andrews, Sally. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Casalis, Séverine, Commissaire, Eva, & Duncan, Lynne G. (2015). Sensitivity to morpheme units in English as L2 word recognition [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.976165
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, Milin, Petar, Cho, Kit W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, & O'Connor, Patrick A. (2015). Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00111
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Katherine. (2012). Morphological processing: A comparison of graded and categorical accounts. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–22). London: Psychology Press.
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Ko, In Yeong. (2018). The time course of activation of semantic and orthographic information in morphological decomposition by Korean adults and developing readers. Frontiers in Communication, 3:51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00051
    • Smolka, Eva, Preller, Katrin H., & Eulitz, Carsten. (2014). ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
    • van den Bosch, Antal. (2006). Spelling space: A computational test bed for phonological and morphological changes in Dutch spelling [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 25–44.
  • Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 37, 895–908. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.6.895 Cited by5
    • Beyersmann, Elisabeth, Kezilas, Yvette, Coltheart, Max, Castles, Anne, Ziegler, Johannes C., Taft, Marcus, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2018). Taking the book from the bookshelf: Masked constituent priming effects from compound words and nonwords. Journal of Cognition, 1(1): 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.11
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Katherine. (2012). Morphological processing: A comparison of graded and categorical accounts. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–22). London: Psychology Press.
    • Schmidt, Karsten. (2014). Morphophonographic regularities in German: The graphematic syllable boundary. A non-linear graphematic approach [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 253–281. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.04sch
    • Smolka, Eva, Preller, Katrin H., & Eulitz, Carsten. (2014). ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
    • Taft, Marcus. (2015). The nature of lexical representation in visual word recognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 99–113). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Dietrich, J. A., & Brady, S. A. (2001). Phonological representations of adult poor readers: An investigation of specificity and stability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 383–418. Cited by4
    • Gilliver, Megan Louise, & Byrne, Brian. (2009). What's in a name? Preschoolers' noun learning performance in relation to their risk for reading disability [Special issue: Lexical representations in reading and writing, edited by Joanne Arciuli]. Reading and Writing, 22(6), 637–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9155-5
    • Messbauer, Vera C. S., & de Jong, Peter F. (2006). Effects of visual and phonological distinctness on visual-verbal paired associate learning in Dutch dyslexic and normal readers. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 393–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5121-7
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Fowler, Anne E. (2004). Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(5), 483–515. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044598.81628.e6
    • Smith, Susan Lambrecht. (2009). Early phonological and lexical markers of reading disabilities. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9101-y
  • Dietrich, Manfred, & Loretz, Oswald. (1988). Die Keilalphabete: Die phönizisch-kanaanäischen und altarabischen Alphabete in Ugarit. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag. Cited by11
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Ellison, John L. (2014). The Ugaritic alphabetic script. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 56–71). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1984). A history of writing. London: British Library. [1987, Second edition; 1992, Third revised edition, London: British Library; New York: Abbeville Press]
    • Healey, John F. (1990). The early alphabet (Reading the past). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2012). The shape of script: How and why writing systems change (School for Advanced Research Advanced Seminar Series). Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
    • Krebernik, Manfred, & Nissen, Hans J. (1994). Die sumerisch-akkadische Keilschrift [Sumerian-Accadic cuneiform scripts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 274–288). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Lehmann, Reinhard G. (2012). 27–30–22–26 – How many letters needs an alphabet? The case of Semitic. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 11–52). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Tropper, Josef. (1994). Die nordwestsemitischen Schriften [North-west Semitic scripts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 297–306). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 496–518. Cited by8
    • Casaponsa, Aina, Carreiras, Manuel, & Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni. (2015). How do bilinguals identify the language of the words they read? Brain Research, 1624, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.07.035
    • Gomez, Pablo. (2012). Mathematical models of the lexical decision task. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 70–89). London: Psychology Press.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2006). Morpho-Phonemic similarity within and between languages: A factor to be considered in processing Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9009-y
    • Jared, Debra. (2015). Literacy and literacy development in bilinguals. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 165–182). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Rao, Chaitra, Vaid, Jyotsna, Srinivasan, Narayanan, & Chen, Hsin-Chin. (2011). Orthographic characteristics speed Hindi word naming but slow Urdu naming: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu biliterates [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9256-9
    • Schwartz, Ana I., & Van Hell, Janet G. (2012). Bilingual visual word recognition in sentence context. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 131–150). London: Psychology Press.
    • Van Heuven, Walter J. B. (2005). Bilingual interactive activation models of word recognition in a second language. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (260–288). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
  • Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (1998). The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 189–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by5
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Jared, Debra. (2015). Literacy and literacy development in bilinguals. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 165–182). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Koda, Keiko. (2005). Learning to read across writing systems: Transfer, metalinguistic awareness, and second-language reading development. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (311–334). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Ma, Fengyang, Ai, Haiyang, & Guo, Taomei. (2018). Semantic and lexical processing of words across two languages in Chinese-English bilinguals. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 163–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Van Heuven, Walter J. B. (2005). Bilingual interactive activation models of word recognition in a second language. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (260–288). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
  • Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1366728902003012 Cited by7
    • Casaponsa, Aina, Carreiras, Manuel, & Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni. (2015). How do bilinguals identify the language of the words they read? Brain Research, 1624, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.07.035
    • Crosson, Amy C., & Lesaux, Nonie K. (2010). Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers' text-reading fluency in English. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9168-8
    • de Zeeuw, Marlies, Schreuder, Robert, & Verhoeven, Ludo T. W. (2015). Lexical processing of nominal compounds in first- and second-language learners across primary grades [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.926806
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2006). Five challenges for activation models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 95–121). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Jared, Debra. (2015). Literacy and literacy development in bilinguals. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 165–182). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Schwartz, Ana I., & Van Hell, Janet G. (2012). Bilingual visual word recognition in sentence context. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 131–150). London: Psychology Press.
    • Van Heuven, Walter J. B. (2005). Bilingual interactive activation models of word recognition in a second language. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (260–288). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
  • Diller, Anthony. (1996). Thai and Lao writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 457–466). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by8
    • Bassetti, Benedetta. (2005). Effects of writing systems on second language awareness: Word awareness in English learners of Chinese as a foreign language. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 335–356). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597954‑015
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • Diller, Anthony. (2017). Early Thai orthography: Innovative tone-marking or recent hoax? Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00005.dil
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Lew, Sigrid. (2014). A linguistic analysis of the Lao writing system and its suitability for minority language orthographies [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.846843
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2003). A formal computational analysis of Indic scripts. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 9–40). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2006). Brahmi-derived scripts, script layout, and segmental awareness [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.05spr
  • Diller, Anthony. (2017). Early Thai orthography: Innovative tone-marking or recent hoax? Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00005.dil
  • Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1297–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139208967394 Cited by7
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Dyson, Mary C., & Gregory, Judy. (2002). Typographic cueing on screen. Visible Language, 36(3), 326–346.
    • Kerr, Matthew A., & Symons, Sonya E. (2006). Computerized presentation of text: Effects on children's reading of informational material [Special issue: Reading comprehension - Part II]. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145–003-8128-y
    • Marshall, Catherine C. (2010). Reading and writing the electronic book (Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services 9). Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
    • Nanavati, Anuj A., & Bias, Randolph G. (2005). Optimal line length in reading - A literature review. Visible Language, 39(2), 120–145.
    • Ruecker, Stan, & Uszkalo, Kirsten C. (2007). Binding the electronic book: Design features for bibliophiles. Visible Language, 41(1), 50–69.
    • Shibata, Hirohito, & Omura, Kengo. (2020). Why digital displays cannot replace paper: The cognitive science of media for reading and writing. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9476-2
  • Dillon, Amanda. (2020). Be your own scribe: Bible journalling and the new illuminators of the densely-printed page. In Bradford A. Anderson (Ed.), From scrolls to scrolling: Sacred texts, materiality, and dynamic media cultures (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam – Tension, Transmission, Transformation 12) (pp. 153–178). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110634440-008
  • Dinh, Khac-Thuan. (2017). Vietnam Tran Dynasty inscriptions at the time of the Yuan Dynasty in China. Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, 1(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/2513850217709223
  • Diringer, David. (1937). L'alfabeto nella storia della civiltà. Florence: Barbera. Cited by5
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Diringer, David. (1948). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind. London: Hutchinson; New York: Philosophical Library. [1953, Second revised edition; 1968, Third revised edition (2 volumes), London: Hutchinson; New York: Funk & Wagnalls; 1996, Reprinted, Munshiram Maniharlal Publishers]
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Trager, George L. (1974). Writing and writing systems. In Thomas A. Sebeok (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics (Linguistics and Adjacent Arts and Sciences 12) (pp. 373–469). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
  • Diringer, David. (1943). The origin of the alphabet. Antiquity, 17, 77–90. Cited by4
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Katzir, Tami, Shaul, Shelly, Bretnitz, Zvia, & Wolf, Maryanne. (2004). The universal and the unique in dyslexia: A cross-linguistic investigation of reading and reading fluency in Hebrew-and English-speaking children with reading disorders [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 739–768.
  • Diringer, David. (1948). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind. London: Hutchinson; New York: Philosophical Library. [1953, Second revised edition; 1968, Third revised edition (2 volumes), London: Hutchinson; New York: Funk & Wagnalls; 1996, Reprinted, Munshiram Maniharlal Publishers] Cited by39
    • Baroni, Antonio. (2011). Alphabetic vs. non-alphabetic writing: Linguistic fit and natural tendencies. Rivista di Linguistica [Italian Journal of Linguistics], 23(2), 127–159.
    • Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [2007, Second edition]
    • Basso, Keith H., & Anderson, Ned. (1977). A Western Apache writing system: The symbols of Silas John. In Joshua A. Fishman, (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 77–104). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Bhatt, Prath M. (1988). Graphic systems, phonic systems, and linguistic representations. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 106–120). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Blood, Doris E. (2008). The ascendancy of the Cham script: How a literacy workshop became the catalyst [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.034
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2001). Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 43–80). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. [2017, Second edition, (pp. 75–94)]
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2006). On beyond alphabets [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.03dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2021). Hebrew script for Jewish languages: A unique phenomenon. Written Language & Literacy, 24(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00050.dan
    • de Kerckhove, Derrick. (1988a). Logical principles underlying the layout of Greek orthography. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 153–172). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2010a). Introducing writing on writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 1–5). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Dichy, Joseph. (2017). The analytics of writing, exemplified by Arabic, the youngest of the Semitic scripts. In Manuel Sartori, Manuela E. B. Giolfo, & Philippe Cassuto (Eds), Approaches to the history and dialectology of Arabic in honor of Pierre Larcher (Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics 88) (pp. 29–56). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    • Ehlich, Konrad. (1983). Development of writing as social problem solving. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 99–129). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (1997). Rongorongo: The Easter Island script: History, traditions, texts (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 14). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Goody, Jack. (1987). The interface between the written and oral (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Harbour, Daniel. (2021). Grammar drives writing system evolution. Lessons from the birth of vowels. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 201–221). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-harb
    • Harris, Roy. (2000). Rethinking writing. London; New York: Continuum.
    • Hockett, Charles F. (2003). Two lectures on writing [prepared for publication by Peter T. Daniels]. Written Language & Literacy, 6(2), 131–175.
    • Jensen, Hans. (1935). Die Schrift in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Glückstadt; Hamburg: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften VEB. [1958, Second edition; 1968, Third edition; 1969, Sign, symbol and script: An account of man's efforts to write (Translated by George Unwin). London: George Allen & Unwin; New York: Putman's]
    • McCarthy, Suzanne. (1995). The Cree syllabary and the writing system riddle: A paradigm in crisis. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 59–75). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • McDougall, Siné, Brunswick, Nicola, & de Mornay Davies, Paul. (2010). Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies: An introduction and overview. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 3–21). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • McLuhan, Marshall. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto; Buffalo; London: University of Toronto Press.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Mikulska, Katarzyna. (2019a). Introduction: Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach [translation by Jerome A. Offner]. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 3–22). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c000b
    • Mistry, P. J. (2003). Gujarati script: Its emergence and divergence. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 154–180). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Powell, Barry B. (2009). Writing: Theory and history of the technology of civilization. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Segert, Stanislav. (1983). Decipherment of forgotten writing systems: Two different approaches. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 131–156). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Share, David L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(752). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
    • Share, David L. (2017). Learning to read Hebrew. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 155–180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Share, David L., Shany, Michal, & Lipka, Orly. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Hebrew. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 152–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.008
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Trager, George L. (1974). Writing and writing systems. In Thomas A. Sebeok (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics (Linguistics and Adjacent Arts and Sciences 12) (pp. 373–469). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
  • Diringer, David. (1953). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind (Second revised edition). London: Hutchinson; New York: Philosophical Library. [1948, First edition; 1968, Third revised edition (2 volumes), London: Hutchinson; New York: Funk & Wagnalls; 1996, Reprinted, Munshiram Maniharlal Publishers] Cited by8
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Danesi, Marcel. (2017). The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet (Bloomsbury Advances in Semiotics). London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1995). Scripts and writing systems: A historical perspective. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 19–30). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Kotei, S. I. A. (1977). The West African autochthonous alphabets: An exercise in comparative palaeography. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 55–73). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
    • Salomon, Richard G. (2000). Typological observations on the Indic script group and its relationship to other alphasyllabaries [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj. B. Kachu]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 87–103.
    • Sen, Subhadra Kumer. (1996). The Devanagari writing system. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1428–1432). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Srivastava, Anupama. (1998). The development of imperial Gupta Brāhmī script (The Heritage of Ancient India 35). New Delhi: Ramanand Vidya Bhawan.
  • Diringer, David. (1953b). The hand-produced book. London: Hutchinson's Scientific and Technical Publications. Cited by5
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1984). A history of writing. London: British Library. [1987, Second edition; 1992, Third revised edition, London: British Library; New York: Abbeville Press]
    • Jördens, Andrea. (2020). Codices des Typs C und die Anfänge des Blätterns. In Anna Krauß, Jonas Leipziger, & Friederike Schücking-Jungblut (Eds.), Material aspects of reading in ancient and medieval cultures: Materiality, presence and performance (Materiale Textkulturen 26) (pp. 115–148). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110639247-009
    • Levarie, Norma. (1968). The art and history of books. New York: James H. Heinemn. [1995, Reprinted, New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press; London: The British Library]
    • Rollston, Christopher A. (2014c). Northwest Semitic cursive scripts of Iron II. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 202–234). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
  • Diringer, David. (1958a). The illuminated book, its history and production. London: Faber and Faber. [1967, second edition] Cited by3
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1984). A history of writing. London: British Library. [1987, Second edition; 1992, Third revised edition, London: British Library; New York: Abbeville Press]
    • Levarie, Norma. (1968). The art and history of books. New York: James H. Heinemn. [1995, Reprinted, New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press; London: The British Library]
  • Diringer, David. (1958b). The story of the aleph beth. New York: Philosophical Library. Cited by4
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
  • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger. Cited by37
    • Basso, Keith H., & Anderson, Ned. (1977). A Western Apache writing system: The symbols of Silas John. In Joshua A. Fishman, (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 77–104). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Bhatt, Prath M. (1988). Graphic systems, phonic systems, and linguistic representations. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 106–120). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Boone, Elizabeth Hill. (1994a). Introduction: Writing and recorded knowledge. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 3–26). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996b). Typology of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1380–1387). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2014). Writing systems and language contact in the Euro- and Sinocentric worlds. Applied Linguistics Review, 5(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2014-0001
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Firmage, R. A. (1993). The alphabet abecedarium: Some notes on letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine. [2000, Reprinted, London: Bloomsbury]
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (1997). Rongorongo: The Easter Island script: History, traditions, texts (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 14). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Harris, Roy. (2000). Rethinking writing. London; New York: Continuum.
    • Healey, John F. (1990). The early alphabet (Reading the past). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2011). The relation of orthographic units to linguistic units in the Japanese writing system: An analysis of kanji, kana and kanji-okurigana writing. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Tsukuba, Japan.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Iwaniszewski, Stanisław. (2019). Geometric motifs in rock art as a system of visual communication. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 257–273). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c009
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Joyce, Terry. (2016). Writing systems and scripts. In Andrea Rocci & Louis de Saussure (Eds.), Verbal communication (Handbooks of Communication Science 3) (pp. 287–308). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255478-016
    • Joyce, Terry, & Borgwaldt, Susanne R. (2011). Typology of writing systems: Special issue introduction [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.01joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Lock, Charles. (2016). On roman letters and other stories: An essay in heterographics. Journal of World Literature, 1(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/ 10.1163/24056480-00102003
    • Lyons, Martyn, & Marquilhas, Rita (Eds.). (2017). Approaches to the history of written culture: A world inscribed (New Directions in Book History). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54136-5
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Mignolo, Walter D. (1994a). Signs and their transmission: The question of the book in the New World. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 220–270). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
    • Piquette, Kathryn E. (2018b). Signs and symbols. In Andrew Gardner, Mark Lake, & Ulrike Sommer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of archaeological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199567942.013.020
    • Pope, Maurice. (1975). The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphics to Linear B. London: Thames & Hudson: New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. [1999, Revised edition, The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphs to Maya script. London; New York: Thames & Hudson]
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sassoon, Rosemary. (1995). The acquisition of a second writing system. Oxford: Intellect.
    • Scribner, Sylvia, & Cole, Michael. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
    • Senner, Wayne M. (1989). Theories and myths on the origins of writing: A historical overview. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 1–26). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    • Smalley, William A. (1994b). Native creation of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 708–720). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Srivastava, Anupama. (1998). The development of imperial Gupta Brāhmī script (The Heritage of Ancient India 35). New Delhi: Ramanand Vidya Bhawan.
    • Stubbs, Michael. (1980). Language and literacy: The sociolinguistics of reading and writing. London; Boston; Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    • The Unicode Consortium. (1991). The Unicode Standard: Version 1.0. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [1996, Version 2.0; 2003, Version, 4.0.0; 2005, Version 5.0; 2011, Version 6.0.0; 2016, Version 9.0.0; 2018, Version 11.0.0]
    • Trager, George L. (1974). Writing and writing systems. In Thomas A. Sebeok (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics (Linguistics and Adjacent Arts and Sciences 12) (pp. 373–469). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Zadka, Małgorzata. (2018). Semasiographic principle in Linear B inscriptions. Writing Systems Research, 10(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2019.1588835
  • Diringer, David. (1967). The illuminated book, its history and production (Second edition). London: Faber and Faber. [1958a, First edition] Cited by2
    • Drogin, Marc. (1980). Medieval calligraphy: Its history and technique. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun and Co. [1989, Corrected reprint, New York: Dover Publications]
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
  • Diringer, David. (1968). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind (Third revised edition) (2 volumes). London: Hutchinson; New York: Funk & Wagnalls. [1948, First edition, London: Hutchinson; New York: Philosophical Library; 1953, Second revised edition; 1996, Reprinted, Munshiram Maniharlal Publishers] Cited by74
    • Amha, Azeb. (2010). On loans and additions to the Fidäl (Ethiopic) writing system. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 179–196). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [2007, Second edition]
    • Bhatia, Tej K. (2003). The Gurmukhi script and other writing systems of Punjab: History, structure and identity. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 181–213). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Boeckeler, Erika Mary. (2017). Playful letters: A study in early modern alphabetics. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
    • Bright, William. (1999). A matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.03bri
    • Bright, William. (2000). A matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 63–71.
    • Brockmeier, Jens, & Olson, David R. (2009). The literacy episteme: From Innis to Derrida. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 3–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1994a). Theorie der Schriftgeschichte [Theory of the history of writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 256–264). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1994b). Schriftlichkeit und Diglossie [Writing and diglossia]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 739–745). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2009). Evaluating merit–the evolution of writing reconsidered. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp001
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2001). Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 43–80). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. [2017, Second edition, (pp. 75–94)]
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2006). On beyond alphabets [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.03dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2017a). The writing systems of Indo-European. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph, & Matthias Fritz (Eds.) in cooperation with Mark Wenthe, Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 41.1) (pp. 26–61). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261288-00
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2021). Hebrew script for Jewish languages: A unique phenomenon. Written Language & Literacy, 24(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00050.dan
    • de Voogt, Alex. (2010a). Introducing writing on writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 1–5). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Dichy, Joseph. (2017). The analytics of writing, exemplified by Arabic, the youngest of the Semitic scripts. In Manuel Sartori, Manuela E. B. Giolfo, & Philippe Cassuto (Eds), Approaches to the history and dialectology of Arabic in honor of Pierre Larcher (Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics 88) (pp. 29–56). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    • Eviatar, Zohar, & Share, David. (2013). Processing Semitic writing systems: Introduction to a special issue of Writing Systems Research [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.863086
    • Firmage, R. A. (1993). The alphabet abecedarium: Some notes on letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine. [2000, Reprinted, London: Bloomsbury]
    • Fischer, Henry George. (1989). The origin of Egyptian hieroglyphs. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 59–76). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1984). A history of writing. London: British Library. [1987, Second edition; 1992, Third revised edition, London: British Library; New York: Abbeville Press]
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Glück, Helmut. (1994). Schriften im Kontakt [Writing systems in contact]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 745–766). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Healey, John F. (1990). The early alphabet (Reading the past). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    • Humery, Marie-Ève. (2014). Fula and the ajami writing system in the Haalpulaar society of Fuuta Tooro (Senegal and Mauritania): A specific ‘restricted literacy’. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 174–198). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Kaye, Alan S. (1996). Adaptations of Arabic script. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 743–762). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Knight, Stan. (1996). The Roman alphabet. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 312–332). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Lemarie, André. (2014a). A history of Northwest Semitic epigraphy. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 5–29). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Man, John. (2000). Alpha Beta: How 26 letters shaped the Western world. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Nakanishi, Akira. (1980). Writing systems of the word: Alphabets, syllabaries, pictograms (Revised translation). Boston; Vermont; Tokyo: Tuttle Publishing. [1975, Sekai no moji. Kyoto: Shōkadō; 1998, Revised edition, Tuttle Publishing]
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678466
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Pope, Maurice. (1975). The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphics to Linear B. London: Thames & Hudson: New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. [1999, Revised edition, The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphs to Maya script. London; New York: Thames & Hudson]
    • Rimzhim, Anurag, Katz, Leonard, & Fowler, Carol A. (2014). Brāhmī-derived orthographies are typologically Āksharik but functionally predominantly alphabetic [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855618
    • Robinson, Andrew. (1995). The story of writing: Alphabets, hieroglyphs & pictograms. London: Thames & Hudson. [2007, Revised edition]
    • Robinson, Andrew. (2009b). Writing and script: A very short introduction (Very Short Introductions). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Salomon, Richard G. (1996). Brahmi and Kharoshthi. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 373–383). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [1987, Reprinted with corrections; 2015, Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing]
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
    • Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. (1992). Before writing [Two volumes: Volume 1. From counting to cuneiform; Volume 2. A catalog of near eastern tokens]. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    • Scribner, Sylvia, & Cole, Michael. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
    • Sebba, Mark. (2009). Sociolinguistic approaches to writing systems research. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp002
    • Segert, Stanislav. (1983). Decipherment of forgotten writing systems: Two different approaches. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 131–156). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Segert, Stanislav. (1994). Decipherment. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 416–423). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Senner, Wayne M. (1989). Theories and myths on the origins of writing: A historical overview. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 1–26). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    • Sirat, Colette. (1988). The material conditions of the lateralization of the ductus. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 173–201). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Sirat, Colette. (1994). Handwriting and the writing hand. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 375–460). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Smalley, William A. (1994a). Codification by means of foreign systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 697–708). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Smalley, William A. (1994b). Native creation of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 708–720). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Smalley, William, Chia Koua Vang, & Gnia Yee Yang. (1990). Mother of writing: The origin and development of a Hmong messianic script. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
    • Song, Ki-Joong. (2011). Ancient Indian and Chinese models of sound classification and their reflections in the writing systems. Scripta, 3, 25–43.
    • Street, Brian V., & Lefstein, Adam. (2007). Literacy: An advanced resource book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Taylor, Insup. (1980). The Korean writing system: An alphabet? a syllabary? a logography? In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 67–82). New York; London: Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1068-6_5
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1995). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.3 [2014, Revised edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14)]
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
    • The Unicode Consortium. (1991). The Unicode Standard: Version 1.0. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [1996, Version 2.0; 2003, Version, 4.0.0; 2005, Version 5.0; 2011, Version 6.0.0; 2016, Version 9.0.0; 2018, Version 11.0.0]
    • Throop, Liz C. (2004). Thinking on paper: Hindu-Arabic numerals in European typography. Visible Language, 38(3), 290–303.
    • Watt, William C. (1988a). Canons of alphabetic change. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 122–152). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Watt, W. C. (1994b). Part I. Reading, writing and the difference: Introduction. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 3–10). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Watt, W. C. (1994c). Part II. Writing systems: Introduction. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 89–114). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Watt, W. C. (1994d). Curves as angles. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 215–246). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Diringer, David. (1977). A history of the alphabet (Second edition). London. Cited by5
    • Bhatt, Prath M. (1988). Graphic systems, phonic systems, and linguistic representations. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 106–120). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Brekle, Herbert E. (1994b). Die Buchstabenformen westlicher Alphabetschriften in ihrer historischen Entwicklung [The development of letter forms in western alphabets]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 171–204). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110111293.1.2.171
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1984). A history of writing. London: British Library. [1987, Second edition; 1992, Third revised edition, London: British Library; New York: Abbeville Press]
  • Diringer, David. (1996). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind (Reprint) (2 volumes). New Delhi: Munshiram Maniharlal Publishers. [1948, First edition, London: Hutchinson; New York: Philosophical Library; 1953, Second revised edition; 1968, Third revised edition, (2 volumes), London: Hutchinson; New York: Funk & Wagnalls] Cited by3
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Powell, Barry B. (2009). Writing: Theory and history of the technology of civilization. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Dixon, M., & Kaminska, Z. (1994). Casting a spell with witches and broomsticks: Direct and associative influences on pseudoword orthography. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 383–398. Cited by3
    • Bosse, Marie-Line, Valdois, Sylviane, & Tainturier, Marie-Josèphe. (2003). Analogy without priming in early spelling development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(7), 693–716.
    • Dixon, Maureen, & Kaminska, Zofia. (1997). Is it misspelled or is it mispelled? The influence of fresh orthographic information on spelling [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 483–498.
    • Kaminska, Zofia. (2003). Little Frog and Toad: Interaction of orthography and phonology in Polish spelling [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 61–80.
  • Dixon, Maureen, & Kaminska, Zofia. (1997). Is it misspelled or is it mispelled? The influence of fresh orthographic information on spelling [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 483–498. Cited by4
    • Abrams, Lise, Trunk, Dunja L., & White, Katherine K. (2008). Visual and auditory priming influences the production of low-frequency spellings. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 745–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9090-x
    • Kwong, Tru E., Desjarlais, Malinda, & Duffy, Megan L. (2015). Aer yuo looking cloesly? Even good spellers are impacted by partial cue reading. Written Language & Literacy, 18(1), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.04kwo
    • McGuinness, Diane. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Stebbins, Tonya. (2001). Emergent spelling patterns in Sm'algyax (Tsimshian, British Columbia). Written Language & Literacy, 4(2), 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.4.2.03ste
  • Dixon, Maureen, Stuart, Morag, & Masterson, Jackie. (2002). The relationship between phonological awareness and the development of orthographic representations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 295–316. Cited by2
    • Blair, Rebecca, & Savage, Robert. (2006). Name writing but not environmental print recognition is related to letter-sound knowledge and phonological awareness in pre-readers. Reading and Writing, 19(9), 991–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9027-9
    • Kim, Young-Suk. (2009b). The foundation of literacy skills in Korean: The relationship between letter-name knowledge and phonological awareness and their relative contribution to literacy skills. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 907–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9131-0
  • Dixon, Peter, Harrison, Karen, & Taylor, Dean. (1995). Effects of sentence form on the construction of mental plans from procedural discourse. In John M. Henderson, Murray Singer, & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 247–272). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Dixon, P., LeFevre, J. A., & Twilley, L. C. (1988). Word knowledge and working memory as predictors of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.465 Cited by6
    • Andreassen, Rune, & Bråten, Ivar. (2010). Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different multiple-choice tests. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(3), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01413.x
    • Cain, Kate, Compton, Donald L., & Parrila, Rauno K. (2017c). Introduction to reading comprehension. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 237–238). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Keenan, Janice M., & Betjemann, Rebecca S. (2008a). Comprehension of single words: The role of semantics in word identification and reading disability. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 191–210). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Russell, Devin, & Connor, Carol McDonald. (2016). Memory and learning to read. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 53–66). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Seigneuric, Alix, & Ehrlich, Marie-France. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children's reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 617–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0
    • Seigneuric, Alix, Ehrlich, Marie-France, Oakhill, Jane V., & Yuill, Nicola M. (2000). Working memory resources and children's reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008088230941
  • Djurek, Nikola. (2008). The new way of making fonts with DTL font master. Visible Language, 42(3), 285–300.
  • Doblhofer, Ernst. (1957). Zeichen und Wunder. Die Entzifferung verschollener Schriften und Sprachen. Wien; Berlin; Stuttgart: Paul Neff Verlag. [1961, Voices in stone: The decipherment of ancient scripts and writings (Translated by Mervyn Savill). London: Souvenir Press; New York: Viking Press] Cited by8
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996d). Methods of decipherment. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 141–159). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (1997). Rongorongo: The Easter Island script: History, traditions, texts (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 14). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Melka, Tomi S., & Schoch, Robert M. (2021). A case in point: Communication with unknown intelligence/s. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 513–559). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-melk
    • Segert, Stanislav. (1983). Decipherment of forgotten writing systems: Two different approaches. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 131–156). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Segert, Stanislav. (1994). Decipherment. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 416–423). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Doblhofer, Ernst. (1961). Voices in stone: The decipherment of ancient scripts and writings (Translated by Mervyn Savill). London: Souvenir Press; New York: Viking Press. [1957, Zeichen und Wunder. Die Entzifferung verschollener Schriften und Sprachen. Wien; Berlin; Stuttgart: Paul Neff Verlag] Cited by9
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996d). Methods of decipherment. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 141–159). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Firmage, R. A. (1993). The alphabet abecedarium: Some notes on letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine. [2000, Reprinted, London: Bloomsbury]
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (1997). Rongorongo: The Easter Island script: History, traditions, texts (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 14). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. (1992). Before writing [Two volumes: Volume 1. From counting to cuneiform; Volume 2. A catalog of near eastern tokens]. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    • Senner, Wayne M. (1989). Theories and myths on the origins of writing: A historical overview. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 1–26). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Doblin, Jay. (1980). A structure for nontextual communications (Tutorial paper). In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 89–111). New York; London: Plenum Press.
  • Dobronravin, Nikolay. (2014). West African ajami in the new world (Hausa, Fulfulde, Mande languages). In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics71) (pp. 160–172). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Dobson, E. J. (1957). English pronunciation 1500–1700 (2 volumns). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [1968, Second edition] Cited by4
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Rutkowska, Hanna. (2017). Orthography. In Laurel J. Brinton, & Alexander Bergs (Eds), The history of English. Volume 1: Historical outlines from sound to text (pp. 200–217). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Vachek, Josef. (1973). Written language: General problems and problems of English (Janua Linguarum, Series Critica 14). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Venezky, Richard L. (1970c). The structure of English orthography (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor 82). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
  • Dobson, E. J. (1968). English pronunciation 1500–1700 (Second edition) (2 volumns). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [1957, First edition] Cited by7
    • Aronoff, Mark. (1994). Spelling as culture. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 67–86). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Condorelli, Marco (Ed.). (2020). Advances in historical orthography, c. 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674171
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Rutkowska, Hanna. (2017). Orthography. In Laurel J. Brinton, & Alexander Bergs (Eds), The history of English. Volume 1: Historical outlines from sound to text (pp. 200–217). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Stenroos, Merja, & Smith, Jeremy J. (2016). Changing functions: English spelling before 1600. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 125–141). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Upward, Christopher, & Davidson, George. (2011). The history of English spelling (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Vachek, Josef. (1973). Written language: General problems and problems of English (Janua Linguarum, Series Critica 14). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
  • Dobson, Michael W. (1980). The acquisition anti processing of cartographic information: Some preliminary experimentation. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 291–304). New York; London: Plenum Press. Cited by1
    • Wright, Patricia. (1980). Textual literacy: An outline sketch of psychological research on reading and writing. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 517–535). New York; London: Plenum Press.
  • Dobson, Teresa M., & Willinsky, John. (2009). Digital literacy. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 286–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by1
    • Olson, David R. (2009b). Literacy, literacy policy, and the school. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 566–576). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dockrell, Julie E., & Connelly, Vincent. (2016). The relationships between oral and written sentence generation in English speaking children: The role of language and literacy skills. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 161–177). Cham: Springer.
  • Dockrell, J. E., Lindsay, G., Connelly, V., & Mackie, C. (2007). Constraints in the production of written text in children with specific language impairments. Exceptional Children, 73(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300202 Cited by5
    • Arfé, Barbara, & Pizzocaro, Eleonora. (2016). Sentence generation in children with and without problems of written expression. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 327–344). Cham: Springer.
    • Dockrell, Julie E., & Connelly, Vincent. (2016). The relationships between oral and written sentence generation in English speaking children: The role of language and literacy skills. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 161–177). Cham: Springer.
    • Hooper, Stephen R., Costa, Lara-Jeane, McBee, Matthew, Anderson, Kathleen L., Yerby, Donna C., Knuth, Sean B., & Childress, Amy. (2011). Concurrent and longitudinal neuropsychological contributors to written language expression in first and second grade students [Special issue: Writing development from early to middle childhood, edited by Virgina W. Berninger, Brett Miller & Victoria J. Molfese]. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 221–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9263-x
    • Khoury-Metanis, Afnan, Asadi, Ibrahim A., & Khateb, Asaid. (2018). The contribution of basic linguistic skills to handwriting among fifth-grade Arabic-speaking children. Writing Systems Research, 10(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2018.1540375
    • Salas, Naymé, Llauradó, Anna, Castillo, Cristina, Taulé, Mariona, & Martí, M. Antònia. (2016). Linguistic correlates of text quality from childhood to adulthood. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 307–326). Cham: Springer.
  • Doctor, E. A., & Coltheart, M. (1980). Children's use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning. Memory & Cognition, 8(3), 195–209. Cited by9
    • Daneman, Meredyth, & Reingold, Eyal. (1993). What eye fixations tell us about phonological recoding during reading. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 153–178. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 25–50). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Kwong, Yuk-yee, Cheung, Him, & Chen, Hsuan-Chih. (1997). Learning to read Chinese with computer-based speech feedback. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 347–367). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Seidenberg, M. S. (1992a). Beyond orthographic depth: Equitable division of labor. In R. Frost & K. Katz (Eds.), Orthography; phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 85–118). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Wagner, Richard K., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192
  • Dodd, Barbara. (1980). The spelling abilities of profoundly pre-lingually deaf children. In Uta Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 423–440). London; New York: Academic Press. Cited by7
    • Aaron, P. G., Keetay, V., Boyd, M., Palmatier, S., & Wacks, J. (1998). Spelling without phonology: A study of deaf and hearing children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 1–22.
    • Alamargot, Denis, Lambert, Eric, Thebault, Claire, & Dansac, Christophe. (2007). Text composition by deaf and hearing middle-school students: The role of working memory. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9033-y
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Pattison, Helen. (1986). Orthographic skills in the hearing-impaired. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 341–353). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Treiman, Rebecca. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Doehring, D. G. (1976). Acquisition of rapid reading responses. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 41(2), Serial no 165. Cited by8
    • Aaron, P. G., Joshi, R. M., Ayotollah, Mahboobeh, Ellsberry, Annie, Henderson, Janet, & Lindsey, Kim. (1999). Decoding and sight-word naming: Are they independent components of word recognition skill? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(2), 89–127.
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Lesgold, Alan M., & Perfetti, Charles A. (1981). Interactive processes in reading: Where do we stand? In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 387–407). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Smith, Frank. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [1978, second edition; 1982, third edition; 1988, fourth edition; 1994, fifth edition; 2004, sixth edition, Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Wolf, Maryanne, O'Rourke, Alyssa Goldberg, Gidney, Calvin, Lovett, Maureen, Cirino, Paul, & Morris, Robin. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013816320290
  • Doehring, D. G., Trites, R. L., Patel, P. G., & Fiedorowicz, C. A. M. (1981). Reading disabilities: The interaction of reading, language, and neuropsychological deficits. New York: Academic Press. Cited by4
    • Egan, Joanne, & Pring, Linda. (2004). The processing of inflectional morphology: A comparison of children with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 567–591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044433.30864.23
    • Patel, Purushottam G. (1995). Brahmi scripts, Orthographic units and reading acquisition. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 265–275). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
  • Doermann, David, & Tombre, Karl (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of document image processing and recognition. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-859-1
  • Doerr, Neriko Musha, & Kumagai, Yuri. (2014). Power of language ideologies: Challenging the notion of foreign loanwords in Japanese-as-a-foreign-language classroom. Writing Systems Research, 6(2), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.869190
  • Dolberg, Florian. (2013). Quantifying gender change in Medieval English. In Esther-Miriam Wagner, Ben Outhwaite, & Bettina Beinhoff (Eds.), Scribes as agents of language change (Studies in Language Change 10) (pp. 121–158). Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239–264. Cited by4
    • Franks, Bridget A., Mulhern, Sharon L., & Schillinger, Susan M. (1997). Reasoning in a reading context: Deductive inferences in basal reading series. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(4), 285–312.
    • Sánchez, Emilio, & García, J. Ricardo. (2009). The relation of knowledge of textual integration devices to expository text comprehension under different assessment conditions. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1081–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9145-7
    • Stone, Deborah B., Fisher, Sylvia K., & Eliot, John. (1999). Adults' prior exposure to print as a predictor of the legibility of text on paper and laptop computer. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007993603998
    • van den Bos, Kees P., Brand-Gruwel, Saskia, & Aarnoute, Cor A. J. (1998). Text comprehension strategy instruction with poor readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(6), 471–498.
  • Dollaghan, C. A. (1994). Children's phonological neighbourhoods: Half empty or half full? Journal of Child Language, 21, 257–271. Cited by5
    • Goswami, Usha. (2006). Orthography, phonology, and reading development: A cross-linguistics perspective. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 463–480). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2008). Phonological representations for reading acquisition across languages. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 65–84). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2009). The basic processes in reading: Insights from neuroscience. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 134–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2010). A psycholinguistic grain size view of reading acquisition across languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 23–42). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Walley, Amanda C., Metsala, Jamie L., & Garlock, Victoria M. (2003). Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021789804977
  • d'Ollone, Henri Marie Gustave. (1912). Ecritures des peuples non chinois de la Chine. Paris: Ernest Leroux. Cited by5
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Enwall, Joakim. (2008). Script choice among the Miao in China [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.041
    • Nie, Hongyin. (2018a). Loloish dialect and script of 18th century Liangshan reflected in the Luoluo Yiyu. Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, 2(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2513850217748207
    • Smalley, William A. (1994b). Native creation of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 708–720). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Smalley, William, Chia Koua Vang, & Gnia Yee Yang. (1990). Mother of writing: The origin and development of a Hmong messianic script. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Domahs, F., de Bleser, R., & Eisenberg, P. (2001). Silbische Aspekte segmentalen Schreibens – neurolinguistische Evidenz. Linguistische Berichte, 185, 13–30. Cited by8
    • Evertz, Martin. (2016). Minimal graphematic words in English and German: Lexical evidence for a theory of graphematic feet. Written Language & Literacy, 19(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.2.03eve
    • Evertz, Martin. (2018). Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441
    • Evertz, Martin. (2019). The history of the graphematic foot in English and German. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 27–40). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-ever
    • Evertz, Martin, & Primus, Beatrice. (2013). The graphematic foot in English and German. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.765356
    • Evertz-Rittich, Martin. (2021). What is a written word? And if so, how many? In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 25–45). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-ever
    • Nottbusch, Guido, Grimm, Angela, Weingarten, Rüdiger, & Will, Udo. (2005). Syllabic structures in typing: Evidence from deaf writers. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 497–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3178-y
    • Primus, Beatrice. (2010). Strukturelle Grundlagen des deutschen Schriftsystems. In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller & Gabriele Hinney (Eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch - didaktisch - empirisch [Writing system and writing acquisition: Linguistic, didactic, empirical]. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 289) (pp. 9–45). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter; .Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110232257.9
    • Song, Hye Jeong, & Wiese, Richard. (2010). Resistance to complexity interacting with visual shape—German and Korean orthography. Writing Systems Research, 2(2) 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq010
  • Donahue, Christiane, & Lillis, Theresa. (2014). Models of writing and text production. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 55–78). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Donnelly, Kevin. (2021). Digitising Swahili in Arabic script with Andika! In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 963–984). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-donn
  • Donner, H., & Röllig, W. (1962). Kanaanäische und aramäische Inschriften (3 volumes). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. [1968, Second edition; 1971, Third edition; 1979, Fourth edition; 2002, Fifth edition] Cited by4
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Röllig, Wolfgang. (1994). Die nordwestsemitischen Schriftkulturen [North-west-Semitic literate cultures]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 503–510). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Sass, Benjamin. (1988). The genesis of the alphabet and its development in the second millenium B.C. (Ägyten und Altes Testament 13). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2019). Writing and society in ancient Cyprus (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316729977
  • Donner, H., & Röllig, W. (1968). Kanaanäische und aramäische Inschriften (Second edition) (3 volumes). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. [1962, First edition; 1971, Third edition; 1979, Fourth edition; 2002, Fifth edition] Cited by5
    • Crellin, Robert. (2019). Writing vowels in Punic: From morphography to phonography [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00026.cre
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2020). The decipherment of ancient Near Eastern languages. In Rebecca Hasselbach-Andee (Ed.), A companion to ancient Near Eastern languages (pp. 3–25). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Giunashvili, Helen. (2021). Old Aramaic script in Georgia. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 787–804). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-giun
    • O'Connor, M. (1996a). Epigraphic Semitic scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 88–107). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sass, Benjamin. (1988). The genesis of the alphabet and its development in the second millenium B.C. (Ägyten und Altes Testament 13). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
  • Donner, H., & Röllig, W. (1968). Kanaanäische und aramäische Inschriften (Third edition) (3 volumes). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. [1962, First edition; 1968, Second edition; 1979, Fourth edition; 2002, Fifth edition] Cited by12
    • Amadasi Guzzo, Maria Giulia. (2014). Punic scripts. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 314–333). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Betlyon, John W. (2014). Northwest Semitic scripts on coins. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 352–362). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Bordreuil, Pierre. (2014). On the authenticity of Iron Age Northwest Semitic inscribed seals. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 127–140). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Byrne, Ryan. (2014). The Aramaic papyri scripts. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 291–313). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2020). The decipherment of ancient Near Eastern languages. In Rebecca Hasselbach-Andee (Ed.), A companion to ancient Near Eastern languages (pp. 3–25). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Lemarie, André. (2014a). A history of Northwest Semitic epigraphy. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 5–29). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Lemarie, André. (2014b). Scripts of post–Iron Age Aramaic inscriptions and ostraca. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 235–252). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Rollston, Christopher A. (2014b). The Iron Age Phoenician script. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 72–99). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Rollston, Christopher A. (2014c). Northwest Semitic cursive scripts of Iron II. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 202–234). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Sass, Benjamin. (1988). The genesis of the alphabet and its development in the second millenium B.C. (Ägyten und Altes Testament 13). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
    • Schmitz, Philip C. (2014). Phoenician seal script. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 141–174). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Vanderhooft, David S. (2014). Iron Age Moabite, Hebrew, and Edomite monumental scripts. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 107–126). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
  • Donner, H., & Röllig, W. (1968). Kanaanäische und aramäische Inschriften (Fourth edition) (3 volumes). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. [1962, First edition; 1968, Second edition; 1971, Third edition; 2002, Fifth edition] Cited by2
    • Sass, Benjamin. (1988). The genesis of the alphabet and its development in the second millenium B.C. (Ägyten und Altes Testament 13). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
    • Schmitz, Philip C. (2014). Phoenician seal script. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 141–174). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
  • Donner, H., & Röllig, W. (1968). Kanaanäische und aramäische Inschriften (Fifth edition) (3 volumes). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. [1962, First edition; 1968, Second edition; 1971, Third edition; 1979, Fourth edition] Cited by15
    • Amadasi Guzzo, Maria Giulia. (2014). Punic scripts. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 314–333). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Betlyon, John W. (2014). Northwest Semitic scripts on coins. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 352–362). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Black, Jeremy. (2008). The obsolescence and demise of cuneiform writing in Elam. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 45–72). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Bordreuil, Pierre. (2014). On the authenticity of Iron Age Northwest Semitic inscribed seals. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 127–140). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Byrne, Ryan. (2014). The Aramaic papyri scripts. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 291–313). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Crellin, Robert. (2019). Writing vowels in Punic: From morphography to phonography [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00026.cre
    • Harbour, Daniel. (2021). Grammar drives writing system evolution. Lessons from the birth of vowels. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 201–221). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-harb
    • Lemarie, André. (2014a). A history of Northwest Semitic epigraphy. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 5–29). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Lemarie, André. (2014b). Scripts of post–Iron Age Aramaic inscriptions and ostraca. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 235–252). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Lemarie, André. (2015). Levantine literacy ca. 1000–750 BCE. In Brian B. Schmidt (Ed.), Contextualizing Israel's sacred writing: Ancient literacy, orality, and literary production (Ancient Israel and Its Literature 22) (pp. 11–45). Atlanta, GA: SBL Press.
    • Rollston, Christopher A. (2014b). The Iron Age Phoenician script. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 72–99). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Rollston, Christopher A. (2014c). Northwest Semitic cursive scripts of Iron II. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 202–234). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Sass, Benjamin. (1988). The genesis of the alphabet and its development in the second millenium B.C. (Ägyten und Altes Testament 13). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
    • Schmitz, Philip C. (2014). Phoenician seal script. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 141–174). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Vanderhooft, David S. (2014). Iron Age Moabite, Hebrew, and Edomite monumental scripts. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 107–126). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
  • Doquet, Claire, & Poudat, Céline. (2015). Professional writing as institutional norm and personal style: Inspection reports in French elementary schools. In Georgeta Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface (pp. 229–252). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.12doq
  • Dornseiff, Franz. (1916). Das Alphabet in Magie und Mystik. Leipzig; Berlin: B. G. Teubner. [1925, second edition; 1980, third edition] Cited by1
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
  • Dornseiff, Franz. (1922). Das Alphabet in Magie und Mystik (Second edition). Leipzig; Berlin: B. G. Teubner. [1916, First edition; 1980, Third edition] Cited by8
    • Boeckeler, Erika Mary. (2017). Playful letters: A study in early modern alphabetics. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
    • Diringer, David. (1948). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind. London: Hutchinson; New York: Philosophical Library. [1953, Second revised edition; 1968, Third revised edition (2 volumes), London: Hutchinson; New York: Funk & Wagnalls; 1996, Reprinted, Munshiram Maniharlal Publishers]
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    • Ehlich, Konrad. (1994). Funktion und Struktur schriftlicher Kommunikation [Function and structure of written communication]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 18–41). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Firmage, R. A. (1993). The alphabet abecedarium: Some notes on letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine. [2000, Reprinted, London: Bloomsbury]
    • Geier, Manfred. (1994b). Sekundäre Funktionen der Schrift [Secondary functions of writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 678–686). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Günther, Hartmut. (1996b). Schrift als Zahlen- und Ordnungssystem - alphabetisches Sortieren [Writing as a numbering and ordering system]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1568–1583). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Dornseiff, Franz. (1980). Das Alphabet in Magie und Mystik (Third edition). Leipzig; Berlin: B. G. Teubner. [1916, First edition; 1922, Second edition] Cited by1
    • Geier, Manfred. (1994b). Sekundäre Funktionen der Schrift [Secondary functions of writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 678–686). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Doss, Madiha, & Davies. (2013). Al-ʿāmmiyya al-miṣriyya al-maktūba [Written Egyptian dialect]. Cairo: The General Egyptian Book Organization. Cited by7
    • Brustad, Kristen. (2017). Diglossia as ideology. In Jacob Høigilt & Gunvor Mejdell (Eds.), The politics of written language in the Arab world: Writing change (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 90) (pp. 41–67). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Håland, Eva Marie. (2017). Adab sākhir (satirical literature) and the use of Egyptian vernacular. In Jacob Høigilt & Gunvor Mejdell (Eds.), The politics of written language in the Arab world: Writing change (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 90) (pp. 142–165). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Høigilt, Jacob. (2017). Dialect with an attitude: Language and criticism in New Egyptian print media. In Jacob Høigilt & Gunvor Mejdell (Eds.), The politics of written language in the Arab world: Writing change (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 90) (pp. 166–189). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Høigilt, Jacob, & Mejdell, Gunvor. (2017). Introduction. In Jacob Høigilt & Gunvor Mejdell (Eds.), The politics of written language in the Arab world: Writing change (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 90) (pp. 1–17). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Kindt, Kristian Takvam, & Kebede, Tewodros Aragie. (2017). A language for the people? Quantitative indicators of written dārija and ʿāmmiyya in Cairo and Rabat. In Jacob Høigilt & Gunvor Mejdell (Eds.), The politics of written language in the Arab world: Writing change (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 90) (pp. 18–40). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Mejdell, Gunvor. (2017). Changing norms, concepts and practices of written Arabic: A ‘long distance’ perspective. In Jacob Høigilt & Gunvor Mejdell (Eds.), The politics of written language in the Arab world: Writing change (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 90) (pp. 68–89). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Miller, Catherine. (2017). Contemporary dārija writings in Morocco: Ideology and practices. In Jacob Høigilt & Gunvor Mejdell (Eds.), The politics of written language in the Arab world: Writing change (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 90) (pp. 90–115). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Dowding, Geoffrey. (1961). An introduction to the history of printing types: An illustrated summary of the main stages in the development of type design from 1440 up to the present day: An aid to type face identification. London: Wace & Company. [1998, reprinted, London: The British Library; New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press] Cited by5
    • Cullen, Kristin. (2012). Design elements, typography fundamentals: A graphic style manual for understanding how typography affects design. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
    • Eliason, Craig. (2015). “Transitional” typefaces: The history of a typefounding classification. Design Issues, 31(4), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00349
    • Garfield, Simon. (2010). Just my type: A book about fonts. London: Profile Books.
    • Haley, Allan, Poulin, Richard, Tselentis, Jason, Seddon, Tony, Leonidas, Gerry, Saltz, & Ina, Henderson, Kathryn, with Alterman, Tyler. (2012). Typography, referenced: A comprehensive visual guide to the language, history, and practice of typography. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
    • Sutton, James, & Bartram, Alan. (1990). Typefaces for books. London: The British Library.
  • Dowhower, S. L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional reader's fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 389–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/747699 Cited by9
    • Hudson, Roxanne F., Torgesen, Joseph K., Lane, Holly B., & Turner, Stephen J. (2012). Relations among reading skills and sub-skills and text-level reading proficiency in developing readers. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9283-6
    • LeVasseur, Valerie Marciarille, Macaruso, Paul, & Shankweiler, Donald. (2008). Promoting gains in reading fluency: A comparison of three approaches. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9070-1
    • Levy, Betty Ann, Barnes, Lauren, & Martin, Lisa. (1993). Transfer of fluency across repetitions and across texts. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 401–427. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 273–299). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Martin-Chang, Sandra Lyn, & Levy, Betty Ann. (2005). Fluency transfer: Differential gains in reading speed and accuracy following isolated word and context training. Reading and Writing, 18(4), 343–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-0668-x
    • Martin-Chang, Sandra Lyn, & Levy, Betty Ann. (2006). Word reading fluency: A transfer appropriate processing account of fluency transfer. Reading and Writing, 19(5), 517–542. https://doi.org/101007/s11145-006-9007-0
    • McGuinness, Diane. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Roberts, David, & Walter, Stephen L. (Eds.). (2021). Tone orthography and literacy: The voice of evidence in ten Niger-Congo languages (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 18). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.18
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2003a). Bilingual oral reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of Arabic/Hebrew (L1) - English (L2) readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(8), 717–736.
    • Shany, Michal, & Biemiller, Andrew. (2010). Individual differences in reading comprehension gains from assisted reading practice: Pre existing conditions, vocabulary acquisition, and amounts of practice. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9196-4
  • Downing, John. (1967). Evaluating the initial teaching alphabet. London: Cassell. Cited by9
    • Berry, Jack. (1977). ‘The making of alphabets’ revisited. In Joshua A. Fishman, (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 3–16). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Glushko, Robert J. (1981). Principles for pronouncing print: The psychology of phonography. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 61–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Hanley, J. Richard. (2010). Differences in reading ability between children attending Welsh- and English-speaking primary schools in Wales. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 87–107). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Mountford, John. (1996). A functional classification. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 627–632). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Reid, Agnieszka A. (2006). Developmental dyslexia: Evidence from Polish. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 249–274). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Venezky, Richard L. (1977). Principles for the design of practical writing systems. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 37–54). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
  • Downing, John (Ed.). (1973). Comparative reading. New York: Macmillan. Cited by7
    • Gibson, Eleanor J., & Levin, Harry. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Saenger, Paul. (1997). Space between words: The origins of silent reading (Figurae: Reading Medieval Culture). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [1987, Reprinted with corrections; 2015, Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing]
    • Stubbs, Michael. (1980). Language and literacy: The sociolinguistics of reading and writing. London; Boston; Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    • Treiman, Rebecca. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (1994a). Demographics of literacy. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 767–779). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Downing, J., & Leong, C. K. (1982). Psychology of reading. New York: Macmillan. Cited by9
    • Frith, Uta. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). Hove; Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Hatta, Takeshi, & Hirose, Takehito. (1995). Reading disabilities in Japan: Implications from the study of hemisphere functioning. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 231–246). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Homer, Bruce D., & Olson, David R. (1999). Literacy and children's conception of words. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.07hom
    • Leong, Che Kan. (1995). Orthographic and psycholinguistic considerations in developing literacy in Chinese. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 163–183). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [1987, Reprinted with corrections; 2015, Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing]
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
  • Downing, J., & Oliver, P. (1974). The child's concept of a word. Reading Research Quarterly, 9(4), 568–582. Cited by6
    • Bassetti, Benedetta. (2005). Effects of writing systems on second language awareness: Word awareness in English learners of Chinese as a foreign language. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 335–356). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597954‑015
    • Davidson, Andrew. (2019). Writing: The re-construction of language. Language Sciences, 72, 134–149. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.09.004
    • Homer, Bruce D. (2009). Literacy and metalinguistic development. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 487–500). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Homer, Bruce D., & Olson, David R. (1999). Literacy and children's conception of words. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.07hom
    • Scribner, Sylvia, & Cole, Michael. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
    • Smith, Frank. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [1978, second edition; 1982, third edition; 1988, fourth edition; 1994, fifth edition; 2004, sixth edition, Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
  • Downing, John, & Valtin. Renate (Eds.). (1984). Language awareness and learning to read. New York: Springer-Verlag. Cited by4
    • Aust, Hugo. (1996). Die Entfaltung der Fähigkeit des Lesens [The development of reading skills]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1169–1178). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [2007, Second edition]
    • Dehn, Mechthild, & Sjölin, Amelie. (1996). Frühes Lesen und Schreiben [Early reading and writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1141–1153). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Olson, David R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678466
  • Downing, Pamela, & Lima, Susan D. (1992). Introduction. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. ix-xx). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Downing, Pamela, Lima, Susan D., & Noonan, Michael (Eds.). (1992). The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Cited by10
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Baroni, Antonio. (2011). Alphabetic vs. non-alphabetic writing: Linguistic fit and natural tendencies. Rivista di Linguistica [Italian Journal of Linguistics], 23(2), 127–159.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1998). [Book review: D. Gary Miller, (1994), Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(1), 141–147.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • O'Connor, M. (1996c). The alphabet as a technology. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 787–794). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Ratcliffe, Robert R. (2001). What do “phonemic” writing systems represent?: Arabic huruuf, Japanese kana, and the moraic principle. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 1–14.
    • Sebba, Mark. (2007). Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486739
  • Drake, D. A., & Ehri, L. C. (1984). Spelling acquisition: Effects of pronouncing words on memory for their spellings. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0103_2 Cited by7
    • Allyn, Frances A., & Burt, Jennifer S. (1998). Pinch my wig or winch my pig: Spelling, spoonerisms and other language skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 51–74.
    • Barnes, William G. W. (1992). The developmental acquisition of silent letters in orthographic images. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 191–212). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Burt, Jennifer S., & Fury, Mary B. (2000). Spelling in adults: The role of reading skills and experience. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 1–30.
    • Elbro, Carsten, & de Jong, Peter F. (2017). Orthographic learning is verbal learning: The role of spelling pronunciations. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 169–189). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Hilte, Maartje, Bos, Mieke, & Reitsma, Pieter. (2005). Effects of spelling pronunciations during spelling practice in Dutch [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 137–153.
    • Holmes, Virginia M., & Malone, N. (2004). Adult spelling strategies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 537–566.
    • Ravid, Dorit Diskin. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling (Literacy Studies 3). New York: Springer.
  • Dreuw, P., Heigold, G., & Ney, H. (2009). Confidence-based discriminative training for model adaptation in offline Arabic handwriting recognition. International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) (pp. 596–600), July 2009, Barcelona, Spain. Cited by5
    • Alkhoury, Ihab, Giménez, Adrià, & Juan, Alfons. (2012). Arabic handwriting recognition using Bernoulli HMMs. In Volker Märgner & Haikal El Abed (Eds.), Guide to OCR for Arabic scripts (pp. 255–272). Berlin: Springer.
    • Belaïd, Abdel, & Razzak, Mohamed Imran. (2014). Middle Eastern character recognition. In David Doermann & Karl Tombre (Eds.), Handbook of document image processing and recognition (pp. 427–457). London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-859-1_13
    • Dreuw, Philippe, Rybach, David, Heigold, Georg, & Ney, Hermann. (2012). RWTH OCR: A large vocabulary optical character recognition system for Arabic scripts. In Volker Märgner & Haikal El Abed (Eds.), Guide to OCR for Arabic scripts (pp. 215–254). Berlin: Springer.
    • Märgner, Volker, & El Abed, Haikal. (2012). Arabic handwriting recognition competitions. In Volker Märgner & Haikal El Abed (Eds.), Guide to OCR for Arabic scripts (pp. 395–422). Berlin: Springer.
    • Pechwitz, Mario, El Abed, Haikal, & Märgner, Volker 2012). Handwritten Arabic word recognition using the IFN/ENIT-database. In Volker Märgner & Haikal El Abed (Eds.), Guide to OCR for Arabic scripts (pp. 169–213). Berlin: Springer.
  • Dreuw, Philippe, Rybach, David, Heigold, Georg, & Ney, Hermann. (2012). RWTH OCR: A large vocabulary optical character recognition system for Arabic scripts. In Volker Märgner & Haikal El Abed (Eds.), Guide to OCR for Arabic scripts (pp. 215–254). Berlin: Springer.
  • Drewnowski, A., & Healy, A. F. (1977). Detection errors on the and and: Evidence for reading units larger than the word. Memory & Cognition, 5, 636–647. Cited by9
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Huang, Jong-Tsun, & Wang, Man-Ying. (1992). From unit to gestalt: Perceptual dynamics in recognizing Chinese characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 3–35). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Johnson, Neal F. (1992). On the role of cohorts or neighbors in visual word recognition. In Ram Frost and Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 147–164). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Levy, Betty Ann. (1981). Interactive processing during reading. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 1–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Li, Hong, &Chen, Hsuan-Chih. (1997). Processing of radicals in Chinese character recognition. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 141–160). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Pilotti, Maura, Chodorow, Martin, & Thornton, Kendell C. (2005). Effects of familiarity and type of encoding on proofreading of text. Reading and Writing, 18(4), 325-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145–005-4315-3
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Taylor, Insup. (1980). The Korean writing system: An alphabet? a syllabary? a logography? In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 67–82). New York; London: Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1068-6_5
  • Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(5), 1098–1116. Cited by10
    • Davis, Colin J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Katherine. (2012). Morphological processing: A comparison of graded and categorical accounts. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–22). London: Psychology Press.
    • Kim, Jeesun, Taft, Marcus, & Davis, Chris. (2004). Orthographic-phonological links in the lexicon: When lexical and sublexical information conflict [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 187–218.
    • Liu, Ying, & Peng, Dan-ling. (1997). Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 219–232). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Post, Yolanda V., & Carreker, Suzanne. (2002). Orthographic similarity and phonological transparency in spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 317–340.
    • Rao, Chaitra, Vaid, Jyotsna, Srinivasan, Narayanan, & Chen, Hsin-Chin. (2011). Orthographic characteristics speed Hindi word naming but slow Urdu naming: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu biliterates [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9256-9
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Schiff, Rachel, Raveh, Michal, & Kahta, Shani. (2008). The developing mental lexicon: Evidence from morphological priming of irregular Hebrew forms. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9088-4
    • Smolka, Eva, Preller, Katrin H., & Eulitz, Carsten. (2014). ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
  • Dreyer, Günter. (1998). Umm el-Qaab I: Das prädynastische Königsgrab U-j und seine frühen Schriftzeugnisse. (Archäologische Veröffentlichungen 86). Mainz: Verlag Philipp von Zabern. Cited by14
    • Allen, James P. (2013). The ancient Egyptian language: An historical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Bennet, John. (2013). Epilogue. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 335–342). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.q
    • Chrisomalis, Stephen. (2003). The Egyptian origin of the Greek alphabetic numerals. Antiquity, 77, 485–496.
    • Chrisomalis, Stephen. (2009). The origins and co-evolution of literacy and numeracy. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 59–74). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    • Englehardt, Joshua (Ed.). (2012). Agency in ancient writing. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
    • Flouda, Georgia. (2013). Materiality of Minoan writing: Modes of display and perception. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 143–174). London: Ubiquity Press. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.h
    • Graff, Gwenola. (2017). Predynastic Egyptian iconography: Contributions and relations with the hieroglyphic system's origin. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 221–232). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2012). The shape of script: How and why writing systems change (School for Advanced Research Advanced Seminar Series). Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
    • Piquette, Kathryn E. (2013). “It is written”?: Making, remaking and unmaking early ‘writing’ in the lower Nile Valley. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 213–238). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.k
    • Piquette, Kathryn E. (2018a). An archaeology of art and writing: Early Egyptian labels in context. Cologne: Modern Academic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.16994/bak
    • Piquette, Kathryn E. (2018b). Signs and symbols. In Andrew Gardner, Mark Lake, & Ulrike Sommer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of archaeological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199567942.013.020
    • Quack, Joachim Friedrich. (2010b). Difficult hieroglyphs and unreadable demotic? How the ancient Egyptians dealt with the complexities of their script. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 235–251). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Zinn, Katharina. (2018). Literacy in pharaonic Egypt: Orality and literacy between agency and memory. In Anne Kolb (Ed.), Literacy in ancient everyday life (pp. 67–97). Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Dreyer, L. G., & Katz, L. (1992). An examination of “the simple view of reading”. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 41, 169–175. Cited by5
    • Adlof, Suzanne M., Catts, Hugh W., & Little, Todd D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19(9), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z
    • Carver, Ronald P. (1998). Predicting reading level in grades 1 to 6 from listening level and decoding level: Testing theory relevant to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 121–154.
    • Conners, Frances A. (2009). Attentional control and the Simple View of reading. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9126-x
    • Johnston, Timothy C., & Kirby, John R. (2006). The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4644-2
    • Kershaw, Sarah, & Schatschneider, Chris. (2012). A latent variable approach to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 433–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9278-3
  • Drieghe, D., & Brysbaert, M. (2002). Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 951–961. Cited by5
    • Álvarez, Carlos J., Carreiras, Manuel, & Perea, Manuel. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000242 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 98–123). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2006). Five challenges for activation models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 95–121). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Halderman, Laura K., Ashby, Jane, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2012). Phonology: An early and integral role in identifying words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 207–228). London: Psychology Press.
    • Rao, Chaitra, Vaid, Jyotsna, Srinivasan, Narayanan, & Chen, Hsin-Chin. (2011). Orthographic characteristics speed Hindi word naming but slow Urdu naming: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu biliterates [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9256-9
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M., Desmet, T., & De Baecke, C. (2004). Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000141 Cited by7
    • Hermena, Ehab W., Bouamama, Sana, Liversedge, Simon P., & Drieghe, Denis. (2021). Does diacritics-based lexical disambiguation modulate word frequency, length, and predictability effects? An eye-movements investigation of processing Arabic diacritics. PLoS ONE, 16(11), e0259987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259987
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2015). The work of the eyes during reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 44–59). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Shillcock, Richard. (2007). Eye movements and visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Winskel, Heather, & Perea, Manuel. (2014). Can parafoveal-on-foveal effects be obtained when reading an unspaced alphasyllabic script (Thai)? [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.843440
  • Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2005). Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.954 Cited by12
    • Albrengues, Claire, Lavigne, Frédéric, Aguilar, Carlos, Castet, Eric, & Vitu, Françoise. (2019). Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eyemovement control during reading. PLOS ONE, 14(7), e0219666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219666
    • Beers, Scott F., Quinlan, Thomas, & Harbaugh, Allen G. (2010). Adolescent students' reading during writing behaviors and relationships with text quality: An eyetracking study [Special issue: Reading during writing. What does eyetracking research tell us about the interaction between reading and writing processes during text production?, edited by Luuk Van Waes, Mariëlle, Leijten, & Åsa Wengelin]. Reading and Writing, 23(7), 743–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9193-7
    • Clifton, Charles, Jr. (2015). The roles of phonology in silent reading: A selective review. In Lyn Frazier & Edward Gibson (Eds.), Explicit and implicit prosody in sentence processing: Studies in honor of Janet Dean Fodor (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 46) (pp. 161–176). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3–319-12961-7_9
    • Cutter, Michael G., Drieghe, Denis, & Liversedge, Simon P. (2015). How is information integrated across fixations in reading? In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 245–260). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Hermena, Ehab W., Bouamama, Sana, Liversedge, Simon P., & Drieghe, Denis. (2021). Does diacritics-based lexical disambiguation modulate word frequency, length, and predictability effects? An eye-movements investigation of processing Arabic diacritics. PLoS ONE, 16(11), e0259987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259987
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2012). Eye movements and word recognition during reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 73–101). London: Psychology Press.
    • Shillcock, Richard. (2007). Eye movements and visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Van Waes. Luuk, Leijten, Mariëlle, & Quinlan, Thomas. (2010). Reading during sentence composing and error correction: A multilevel analysis of the influences of task complexity. [Special issue: Reading during writing. What does eyetracking research tell us about the interaction between reading and writing processes during text production?, edited by Luuk Van Waes, Mariëlle, Leijten, & Åsa Wengelin]. Reading and Writing, 23(7), 803–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9190-x
    • White, Sarah J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.205
  • Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(8), 1239-1249. Cited by5
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2012). Eye movements and word recognition during reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 73–101). London: Psychology Press.
    • Slattery, Timothy J. (2016). Eye movements: From psycholinguistics to font design. In Mary C. Dyson & Ching Y. Suen (Eds.), Digital fonts and reading Series on Computer Processing of Languages 1) (pp. 54–78). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
    • White, Sarah J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.205
  • Drieman, G. H. J. (1962). Differences between written and spoken language. Acta Psychologica, 20, 36–58. Cited by4
    • Berman, Ruth A. (2016). Linguistic literacy and later language development. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 181–200). Cham: Springer.
    • Berman, Ruth A., & Nir, Bracha. (2010). The lexicon in writing-speech-differentiation: Developmental perspectives [Special issue: Developmental aspects of written language, edited by Sofía A. Vernon & Mónica Alvarado]. Written Language & Literacy, 13(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.2.01ber
    • Bourdin, Béatrice, & Fayol, Michel. (2000). Is graphic activity cognitively costly? A developmental approach. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 183–196.
    • Goody, Jack. (1987). The interface between the written and oral (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Driessen, J. (1990). An early destruction in the Mycenaean Palace at Knossos: A new interpretation of the excavation field-notes of the South-East area of the West Wing (Acta Archaeologica Lovaniensia – Monographiae 2). Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Cited by6
    • Bennet, John. (2008). Now you see it; now you don't! The disappearance of the Linear A script on Crete. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 1–29). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020). Scribes as editors: Tracking changes in the Linear B documents. American Journal of Archaeology, 124(4), 523–549. https://doi.org/:10.3764/aja.124.4.0523
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
    • Karagianni, Angeliki. (2015). Linear B administration: The communicative aspects of written media and the organisation of the Mycenaean bureaucracy. In Susanne Enderwitz & Rebecca Sauer (Eds.), Communication and materiality: Written and unwritten communication in pre-modern societies (Materiale Textkulturen 8) (pp. 25–60). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Tomas, Helena. (2013). Saving on clay: The Linear B practice of cutting tablets. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 175–191). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.i
  • Driessen, J. (2000). The scribes of the room of the Chariot Tablets at Knossos: Interdisciplinary approach to the study of a Linear B deposit (Minos Supplement 15). Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca. Cited by9
    • Bennet, John. (2008). Now you see it; now you don't! The disappearance of the Linear A script on Crete. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 1–29). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020). Scribes as editors: Tracking changes in the Linear B documents. American Journal of Archaeology, 124(4), 523–549. https://doi.org/:10.3764/aja.124.4.0523
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
    • Karagianni, Angeliki. (2015). Linear B administration: The communicative aspects of written media and the organisation of the Mycenaean bureaucracy. In Susanne Enderwitz & Rebecca Sauer (Eds.), Communication and materiality: Written and unwritten communication in pre-modern societies (Materiale Textkulturen 8) (pp. 25–60). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2013). Syllabic writing on Cyprus and its context (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Tomas, Helena. (2013). Saving on clay: The Linear B practice of cutting tablets. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 175–191). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.i
  • Driessen, J. (2008). Chronology of the Linear B texts. In A. Morpurgo-Davies & Y. Duhoux (Eds.), A companion to Linear B: Mycenaean Greek texts and their world: Volumn 1 (Bibliothè̀que des Cahiers de l'Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 120) (pp. 69–79). Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters. Cited by7
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Finlayson, Sarah. (2013). Form follows function: Writing and its supports in the Aegean Bronze Age. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 123–142). London: Ubiquity Press. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.g
    • Judson, Anna P. (2019). Orthographic variation as evidence for the development of the Linear B writing system [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00025.jud
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020). Scribes as editors: Tracking changes in the Linear B documents. American Journal of Archaeology, 124(4), 523–549. https://doi.org/:10.3764/aja.124.4.0523
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
    • Karagianni, Angeliki. (2015). Linear B administration: The communicative aspects of written media and the organisation of the Mycenaean bureaucracy. In Susanne Enderwitz & Rebecca Sauer (Eds.), Communication and materiality: Written and unwritten communication in pre-modern societies (Materiale Textkulturen 8) (pp. 25–60). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Tomas, Helena. (2013). Saving on clay: The Linear B practice of cutting tablets. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 175–191). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.i
  • Driver, G. R. (1948). Semitic writing: From pictograph to alphabet (The Schweich Lectures of the British Academy, 1944). London: Oxford University Press for the British Academy. [1954, Revised second edition; 1976, Revised third edition, (Edited by Simon A. Hopkins)] Cited by13
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Dichy, Joseph. (2017). The analytics of writing, exemplified by Arabic, the youngest of the Semitic scripts. In Manuel Sartori, Manuela E. B. Giolfo, & Philippe Cassuto (Eds), Approaches to the history and dialectology of Arabic in honor of Pierre Larcher (Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics 88) (pp. 29–56). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1984). A history of writing. London: British Library. [1987, Second edition; 1992, Third revised edition, London: British Library; New York: Abbeville Press]
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Goody, Jack. (1987). The interface between the written and oral (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Pope, Maurice. (1975). The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphics to Linear B. London: Thames & Hudson: New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. [1999, Revised edition, The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphs to Maya script. London; New York: Thames & Hudson]
    • Rico, Christophe. (2015). Les étapes du développement de l'écriture chez l'enfant et l'histoire de l'alphabet. In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 192–219). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    • Salomon, Corinna. (2021). Comparative perspectives on the study of script transfer, and the origin of the runic script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 143–199). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-salo
    • Sassoon, Rosemary. (1995). The acquisition of a second writing system. Oxford: Intellect.
    • Segert, Stanislav. (1983). Decipherment of forgotten writing systems: Two different approaches. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 131–156). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
  • Driver, G. R. (1954). Semitic writing: From pictograph to alphabet (Revised second edition) (The Schweich Lectures of the British Academy, 1944). London: Oxford University Press for the British Academy. [1948, First edition; 1976, Revised third edition, (Edited by Simon A. Hopkins)] Cited by9
    • Bhatt, Prath M. (1988). Graphic systems, phonic systems, and linguistic representations. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 106–120). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Cross, Frank Moore. (1989). The invention and development of the alphabet. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 77–90). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    • de Kerckhove, Derrick. (1988a). Logical principles underlying the layout of Greek orthography. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 153–172). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [1987, Reprinted with corrections; 2015, Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing]
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
    • Segert, Stanislav. (1983). Decipherment of forgotten writing systems: Two different approaches. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 131–156). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Waal, Willemijn. (2018). On the “Phoenician letters”: The case for an early transmission of the Greek alphabet from an archaeological, epigraphic and linguistic perspective. Aegean Studies, 1, 83–125.
  • Driver, G. R. (1976). Semitic writing: From pictograph to alphabet (Revised third edition edited by Simon A. Hopkins) (The Schweich Lectures of the British Academy, 1944). London: Oxford University Press for the British Academy. [1948, First edition; 1954, Revised second] Cited by32
    • Boltz, William G. (1994). The origin and early development of the Chinese writing system (American Oriental Series 78). New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society. [2003, reprinted with corrections]
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag]
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Demsky, Aaron. (2015). The interface of oral and written traditions in ancient Israel: The case of the abecedaries. In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 17–48). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    • Dichy, Joseph. (2017). The analytics of writing, exemplified by Arabic, the youngest of the Semitic scripts. In Manuel Sartori, Manuela E. B. Giolfo, & Philippe Cassuto (Eds), Approaches to the history and dialectology of Arabic in honor of Pierre Larcher (Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics 88) (pp. 29–56). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Dichy, Joseph. (2019). On the writing system of Arabic: The semiographic principle as reflected in Nasḫī letter shapes. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 257–268). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-dich
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    • Ehlich, Konrad. (1983). Development of writing as social problem solving. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 99–129). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Firmage, R. A. (1993). The alphabet abecedarium: Some notes on letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine. [2000, Reprinted, London: Bloomsbury]
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Günther, Hartmut. (1996b). Schrift als Zahlen- und Ordnungssystem - alphabetisches Sortieren [Writing as a numbering and ordering system]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1568–1583). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Handel, Zev. (2019). Sinography: The borrowing and adaptation of the Chinese script (Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis 1). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352223
    • Healey, John F. (1990). The early alphabet (Reading the past). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    • Mattingly, Ignatius G. (1992). Linguistic awareness and orthographic form. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 11–26). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Meltzer, Edmund S. (1994). Hieratic is beautiful: Ancient Egyptian calligraphy revisited. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 293–301). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Powell, Barry B. (2009). Writing: Theory and history of the technology of civilization. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Ravid, Dorit. (2006a). Hebrew orthography and literacy. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Segert, Stanislav. (1983). Decipherment of forgotten writing systems: Two different approaches. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 131–156). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Senner, Wayne M. (1989). Theories and myths on the origins of writing: A historical overview. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 1–26). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    • Sirat, Colette. (1988). The material conditions of the lateralization of the ductus. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 173–201). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Sirat, Colette. (1994). Handwriting and the writing hand. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 375–460). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Smalley, William, Chia Koua Vang, & Gnia Yee Yang. (1990). Mother of writing: The origin and development of a Hmong messianic script. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
    • Tropper, Josef. (1994). Die nordwestsemitischen Schriften [North-west Semitic scripts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 297–306). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Walker, C. B. F. (1987). Cuneiform (Reading the past 3). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press. [1989, Second edition; 1990, In J. T. Hooker (Ed.) Reading the past. Ancient writing from cuneiform to the alphabet (pp. 15–74). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press]
    • Watt, William C. (1988a). Canons of alphabetic change. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 122–152). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Drogin, Marc. (1980). Medieval calligraphy: Its history and technique. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun and Co. [1989, Corrected reprint, New York: Dover Publications] Cited by6
    • Clayton, Ewan. (2013). The golden thread: The story of writing. London: Atlantic Books; Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint.
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    • Firmage, R. A. (1993). The alphabet abecedarium: Some notes on letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine. [2000, Reprinted, London: Bloomsbury]
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Shailor, Barbara A. (1988). The medieval book: Catalogue of an exhibition at the Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library, Yale University (Medieval Academy Reprints for Teaching 28). New Haven, CO: The Library. [1991, Reprinted, The medieval book: Illustrated from the Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library British Library . Toronto; Buffalo; London: University of Toronto Press in association with the Medieval Academy of America]
  • Dronjic, Vedran. (2011). Mandarin Chinese compounds, their representation, and processing in the visual modality [Special issue: Linguistic and cognitive factors in reading Chinese, edited by Xi Chen & Yang C. Luo]. Writing Systems Research, 3(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr005 Cited by3
    • Chen, Xi, & Pasquarella, Adrian. (2017). Learning to read Chinese. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 31–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Singh, Anisha. (2018). Introduction to script processing in Chinese and cognitive consequences for bilingual reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 25–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first- and second-language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 78–103. Cited by12
    • Hickey, Tina. (2005). Second language writing systems: Minority languages and reluctant readers. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 398–423). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Kieffer, Michael J., & Lesaux, Noneie K. (2008). The role of derivational morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing, 21(8), 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9092-8
    • Kieffer, Michael J., & Lesaux, Noneie K. (2012). Knowledge of words, knowledge about words: Dimensions of vocabulary in first and second language learners in sixth grade. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 347–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9272-9
    • Lesaux, Nonie K., Lipka, Orly, & Siegel, Linda S. (2006). Investigating cognitive and linguistic abilities that influence the reading comprehension skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds [Special issue: Reading comprehension - Part II]. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4713-6
    • McElvain, Cheryl Marie. (2010). Transactional literature circles and the reading comprehension of English learners in the mainstream classroom. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 178–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01403.x
    • Nakamura, Pooja R., Koda, Keiko, & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2014). Biliteracy acquisition in Kannada and English: A developmental study [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855620
    • Netten, Andrea, Droop, Mienke, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2011). Predictors of reading literacy for first and second language learners [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9234-2
    • Rolla San Francisco, Andrea, Mo, Elaine, Carlo, María, August, Diane, & Snow, Catherine. (2006). The influences of language of literacy instruction and vocabulary on the spelling of Spanish–English bilinguals. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9012-3
    • Rydland, Veslemøy, Aukrust, Vibeke Grøver, & Fulland, Helene. (2012). How word decoding, vocabulary and prior topic knowledge predict reading comprehension. A study of language-minority students in Norwegian fifth grade classrooms. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9279-2
    • Townsend, Dianna, & Collins, Penny. (2009). Academic vocabulary and middle school English learners: An intervention study. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 993–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9141-y
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (2017a). Learning to read Dutch. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 322–346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Zadeh, Zohreh Yaghoub, Farnia, Fataneh, & Geva, Esther. (2012). Toward modeling reading comprehension and reading fluency in English language learners. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9252-0
  • Drouin, M., & Davis, C. (2009). R u txting? Is the use of text speak hurting your literacy? Journal of Literacy Research, 41(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960802695131 Cited by7
    • Grace, Abbie, & Kemp, Nenagh. (2015). Text messaging language: A comparison of undergraduates' naturalistic textism use in four consecutive cohorts. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.898575
    • Grace, Abbie, Kemp, Nenagh, Martin, Frances Heritage, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Undergraduates' use of text messaging language: Effects of country and collection method [Special issue: The writing system at play, edited by Vivian Cook, Benedetta Bassetti, & Jyotsna Vaid]. Writing Systems Research, 4, 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.712875
    • Kemp, Nenagh. (2010). Texting versus txtng: Reading and writing text messages, and links with other linguistic skills. Writing Systems Research, 2(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq002
    • Kemp, Nenagh, & Grace, Abbie. (2017). Txting across time: Undergraduates' use of ‘textese’ in seven consecutive first-year psychology cohorts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1285220
    • McCausland, Sinéad, Kingston, Justé, & Lyddy, Fiona. (2015). Processing costs when reading short message service shortcuts: An eye-tracking study. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.943150
    • Verheijen, Lieke. (2018). Orthographic principles in computer-mediated communication: The SUPER-functions of textisms and their interaction with age and medium [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 111–145. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00012.ver
    • Wood, Clare, Kemp, Nenagh, & Plester, Beverley. (2013). Text messaging and literacy - The evidence (Routledge Psychology in Education). London; New York: Routledge.
  • Drouin, M., & Driver, B. (2014). Texting, textese and literacy abilities: A naturalistic study. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01532.x Cited by5
    • Grace, Abbie, & Kemp, Nenagh. (2015). Text messaging language: A comparison of undergraduates' naturalistic textism use in four consecutive cohorts. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.898575
    • Grace, Abbie, Kemp, Nenagh, Martin, Frances Heritage, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Undergraduates' use of text messaging language: Effects of country and collection method [Special issue: The writing system at play, edited by Vivian Cook, Benedetta Bassetti, & Jyotsna Vaid]. Writing Systems Research, 4, 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.712875
    • Kemp, Nenagh, & Grace, Abbie. (2017). Txting across time: Undergraduates' use of ‘textese’ in seven consecutive first-year psychology cohorts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1285220
    • McCausland, Sinéad, Kingston, Justé, & Lyddy, Fiona. (2015). Processing costs when reading short message service shortcuts: An eye-tracking study. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.943150
    • Wood, Clare, Kemp, Nenagh, & Plester, Beverley. (2013). Text messaging and literacy - The evidence (Routledge Psychology in Education). London; New York: Routledge.
  • Drozhashchikh, Nataliia, Efimova, Elena, & Meshcheryakova, Evgenia. (2021). Form-meaning regularities in Old English lexicon. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 739–754). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-droz
  • Drucker, J. (1994). The visible word: Experimental typography and modern art, 1909–1923. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Cited by7
    • Auji, Hala. (2016). Printing Arab modernity: Book culture and The American Press in nineteenth-century Beirut (Arts and Archaeology of the Islamic World 7). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Bolter, Jay David. (1991). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [2001, Second edition]
    • Caracciolo, Marco. (2014). Punctuating minds: Non-verbal cues for consciousness representation in literary narrative. Journal of Literary Semantics, 43(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/jls-2014-0003
    • Cullen, Kristin. (2012). Design elements, typography fundamentals: A graphic style manual for understanding how typography affects design. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
    • Mullaney, Thomas S. (2017). The Chinese typewriter: A history. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Rath, Kyle. (2016). Letters that speak: Framing experiential properties of type. Image & Text, 28, 59–100.
    • Starre, Alexander. (2017). Social texts: How to account for the cultural work of carrier media. In Irene Berti, Katharina Bolle, Fanny Opdenhoff, & Fabian Stroth (Eds.), Writing matters: Presenting and perceiving monumental inscriptions in antiquity and the middle ages (Materiale Textkulturen 14) (pp. 27–42). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110534597-003
  • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson. Cited by11
    • Bodel, John, & Houston, Stephen (Eds.). (2021). The hidden language of graphic signs: Cryptic writing and meaningful marks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886505
    • Boeckeler, Erika Mary. (2017). Playful letters: A study in early modern alphabetics. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Cullen, Kristin. (2012). Design elements, typography fundamentals: A graphic style manual for understanding how typography affects design. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996i). Shorthand. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 807–820). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Haley, Allan, Poulin, Richard, Tselentis, Jason, Seddon, Tony, Leonidas, Gerry, Saltz, & Ina, Henderson, Kathryn, with Alterman, Tyler. (2012). Typography, referenced: A comprehensive visual guide to the language, history, and practice of typography. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
    • Scheible, Jeff. (2015). Digital shift: The cultural logic of punctuation. Minneapolis, MN; London: University of Minnesota Press.
    • Shockey, Nathan. (2019). The typographic imagination: Reading and writing in Japan's age of modern print media (Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute). New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard, & Gutkin, Alexander. (2021). The taxonomy of writing systems: How to measure how logographic a system is. Computational Linguistics, 47(3), 477–528. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00409
    • The Unicode Consortium. (1991). The Unicode Standard: Version 1.0. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [1996, Version 2.0; 2003, Version, 4.0.0; 2005, Version 5.0; 2011, Version 6.0.0; 2016, Version 9.0.0; 2018, Version 11.0.0]
    • Willen, Bruce, & Strals, Nolen. (2009). Lettering & type: Creating letters and designing typefaces. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  • Du Ponceau, Peter S. (1838). A dissertation on the nature and character of the Chinese system of writing in a letter to John Vaughan, esq. (Transactions of the Historical and Literary Committee of the American Philosophical Society 2). Philadelphia: M'Carty & Davis. Cited by16
    • Boltz, William G. (1994). The origin and early development of the Chinese writing system (American Oriental Series 78). New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society. [2003, reprinted with corrections]
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag]
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Hannas, William C. (2003). The writing on the wall: How Asian orthography curbs creativity (Encounters with Asia). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2011). The relation of orthographic units to linguistic units in the Japanese writing system: An analysis of kanji, kana and kanji-okurigana writing. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Tsukuba, Japan.
    • Li, David C. S. (2000). Phonetic borrowing. Key to the vitality of written Cantonese in Hong Kong. Written Language & Literacy, 3(2), 199–233.
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • Martin, Samuel E. (1972). Nonalphabetic writing systems: Some observations. In James F. Kavanagh & Ignatius G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 81–102). Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
    • McDonald, Edward. (2016). The “ideograph” and the 漢字 hànzì: A cross-cultural concept with two mutually invisible faces. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 13(2), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.00016.mcd
    • Mullaney, Thomas S. (2017). The Chinese typewriter: A history. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • O'Neill, Timothy Michael. (2016). Ideography and Chinese language theory: A history (Welten Ostasiens - Worlds of East Asia - Mondes de l'Extrême Orient 26). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Stalph, Jürgen. (1996). Das japanische Schriftsystem [The Japanese writing system]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1413–1427). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110147445.2.9.1413
  • Duane, Lucas. (2018). Salty politics and linguistics in the Balearic Islands: Tracing a non-standard iconization in metalinguistic Facebook communities. In Constanze Weth & Kasper Juffermans (Eds.), Tyranny of writing: Ideologies of the written word (Bloomsbury advances in sociolinguistics) (pp. 197–212). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Dubois, Sylvie. (2003). Letter-writing in French Louisiana: Interpreting variable spelling conventions, 1685-1840. Written Language & Literacy, 6(1), 31–70.
  • Dücker, Lisa, Hartmann, Stefan, & Szczepaniak, Renata. (2020). The emergence of sentence-internal capitalisation in Early New High German: Towards a multifactorial quantitative account. In Marco Condorelli (Ed.), Advances in historical orthography, c. 1500–1800 (pp. 67–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674171.004
  • Duff, Fiona J., Hayiou-Thomas, Marianna E., & Hulme, Charles. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of a phonologically based reading intervention for struggling readers with varying language profiles. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9291-6
  • Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90066-6 Cited by15
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Hermena, Ehab W., Bouamama, Sana, Liversedge, Simon P., & Drieghe, Denis. (2021). Does diacritics-based lexical disambiguation modulate word frequency, length, and predictability effects? An eye-movements investigation of processing Arabic diacritics. PLoS ONE, 16(11), e0259987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259987
    • Inhoff, Albrecht W., & Rayner, Keith. (1996). Das Blickverhalten beim Lesen [Eye movements during reading]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 942–957). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Magnuson, James S. (2008). Nondeterminism, pleiotropy, and single-word reading: Theoretical and practical concerns. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 377–404). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Rayner, Keith, Reichle, Erik D., & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Cognitive processes in reading: The E-Z Reader model of eyemovement control. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 122–148). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Schotter, Elizabeth R., Masson, Michael E. J., Potter, Mary C., & Treiman, Rebecca. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. doi10.1177/1529100615623267
    • Reingold, Eyal M., Sheridan, Heather, & Reichle, Erik D. (2015). Direct lexical and nonlexical control of fixation duration in reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 261–276). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2012). Eye movements and word recognition during reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 73–101). London: Psychology Press.
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2015). The work of the eyes during reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 44–59). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Schwartz, Ana I., & Van Hell, Janet G. (2012). Bilingual visual word recognition in sentence context. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 131–150). London: Psychology Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Staub, Adrian. (2015). Reading sentences: Syntactic parsing and semantic interpretation. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 202–216). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Dufresne, Therese, & Masny, Diana. (2005). Different and differing views on conceptualising writing system research and education. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (375–397). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
  • Dufva, Mia, Niemi, Pekka, & Voeten, Marinus J. M. (2001). The role of phonological memory, word recognition, and comprehension skills in reading development: From preschool to grade 2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1/2), 91–117. Cited by6
    • Babayiğit, Selma, & Stainthorp, Rhona. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y
    • Georgiou, George K, Torppa, Minna, Manolitsis, George, Lyytinen, Heikki, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of reading and spelling across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9271-x
    • Holopainen, Leena, Ahonen, Timo, Tolvanen, Asko, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2000). Two alternative ways to model the relation between reading accuracy and phonological awareness at preschool age. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 77–100.
    • Sibley, Daragh E., & Kello, Christopher T. (2012). Learned orthographic representations facilitates large-scale modeling of word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 28–51). London: Psychology Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Taibah, Nadia J., & Haynes, Charles W. (2011). Contributions of phonological processing skills to reading skills in Arabic speaking children [Special issue: Literacy acquisition in Arabic, edited by Abdessatar Mahfoudhi, John Everatt & Gad Elbeheri]. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 1019–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9273-8
  • Duhoux, Yves. (1977). Le disque de Phaistos. Louvain: Peeters. Cited by7
    • Bennett, Emmett L. (1996). Aegean scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 125–133). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Bennett, Emmett L. (1998). [Book review: Steven Roger Fischer, (1988), Evidence for Hellenic dialect in the Phaistos Disk]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 261–264.
    • Chadwick, John. (1987). Linear B and related scripts (Reading the past 1). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press. [1989, Second edition; 1990, In J. T. Hooker (Ed.) Reading the past. Ancient writing from cuneiform to the alphabet (pp. 136–195). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press]
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
    • Stroud, Ronald S. (1989). The art of writing in ancient Greece. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 103–119). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Duhoux, Y. (1978). Une analyse linguistique du linéaire A. In Y. Duhoux (Ed.), Études minoennes I. Le linéaire A (Bibliothè̀que des Cahiers de l'Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 14) (pp. 65–129). Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters. Cited by5
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2013). A linguistic history of Ancient Cyprus: The non-Greek languages, and their relations with Greek, c.1600–300 BC (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2013). Syllabic writing on Cyprus and its context (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Tomas, Helena. (2013). Saving on clay: The Linear B practice of cutting tablets. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 175–191). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.i
  • Duhoux, Y. (1989). Le Linéaire A: Problèmes de Déchiffrement. In Y. Duhoux, T. G. Palaima, & J. Bennet (Eds.), Problems in decipherment (Bibliothè̀que des Cahiers de l'Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 49) (pp. 59–119). Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters. Cited by6
    • Bennett, Emmett L. (1996). Aegean scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 125–133). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Judson, Anna P. (2019). Orthographic variation as evidence for the development of the Linear B writing system [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00025.jud
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
    • Karagianni, Angeliki. (2015). Linear B administration: The communicative aspects of written media and the organisation of the Mycenaean bureaucracy. In Susanne Enderwitz & Rebecca Sauer (Eds.), Communication and materiality: Written and unwritten communication in pre-modern societies (Materiale Textkulturen 8) (pp. 25–60). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
  • Duhoux, Y. (1998). Pre-Hellenic languages of Crete. Journal of Indo-European Studies, 26(1–2), 1–39. Cited by6
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Judson, Anna P. (2019). Orthographic variation as evidence for the development of the Linear B writing system [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00025.jud
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
    • Karagianni, Angeliki. (2015). Linear B administration: The communicative aspects of written media and the organisation of the Mycenaean bureaucracy. In Susanne Enderwitz & Rebecca Sauer (Eds.), Communication and materiality: Written and unwritten communication in pre-modern societies (Materiale Textkulturen 8) (pp. 25–60). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2013). Syllabic writing on Cyprus and its context (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
  • Duhoux, Y. (2009). The Cypro-Minoan Tablet 1885 (Enkomi): An analysis. Kadmos, 48, 5–38. Cited by5
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2013). A linguistic history of Ancient Cyprus: The non-Greek languages, and their relations with Greek, c.1600–300 BC (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2019). Writing and society in ancient Cyprus (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316729977
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2013). Syllabic writing on Cyprus and its context (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
  • Duhoux, Yves. (2013). Non-Greek languages of ancient Cyprus and their scripts: Cypro-Minoan 1–3. In Philippa M. Steele (Ed.), Syllabic writing on Cyprus and its context (Cambridge Classical Studies) (pp. 27–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by5
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2013). A linguistic history of Ancient Cyprus: The non-Greek languages, and their relations with Greek, c.1600–300 BC (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2019). Writing and society in ancient Cyprus (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316729977
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
  • Duhoux, Yves. (2017). Is there anything like a Cypro-Minoan 3 script? In Philippa M. Steele (Ed.). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems (pp. 162–179). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books. Cited by1
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2019). Writing and society in ancient Cyprus (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316729977
  • Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). The relative position priming effect depends on whether letters are vowels or consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 1143–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023577 Cited by5
    • Carreiras, Manuel, Armstrong, Blair C., Perea, Manuel, & Frost, Ram. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005
    • Friedmann, Naama, & Haddad-Hanna, Manar. (2014). Types of Developmental Dyslexia in Arabic. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 119–151). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Pae, Hye K., Bae, Sungbong, & Yi, Kwangoh. (2019). More than an alphabet: Linguistic features of Korean and their influences on Hangul word recognition [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00027.pae
    • Pae, Hye K., Kim, Sun-A, & Luo, Xiao (Peter). (2018). Constituent processing or gestalt processing?: How native Korean speakers read mutilated words in English. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 427–446). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Perea, Manuel. (2015). Neighborhoods effects in visual word recognition and reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 76–87). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Dunand, Maurice. (1945). Byblia grammata: Documents et recherches sur le développement de l'ériture en Phénicie. Beirut: Ministry of Education of Lebanon. Cited by12
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Cross, Frank Moore. (1989). The invention and development of the alphabet. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 77–90). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996c). The first civilization. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 21–32). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Koller, Aaron. (2018). The diffusion of the alphabet in the second millennium BCE: On the movements of scribal ideas from Egypt to the Levant, Mesopotamia, and Yemen. Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections, 20, 1–14.
    • Krebernik, Manfred, & Nissen, Hans J. (1994). Die sumerisch-akkadische Keilschrift [Sumerian-Accadic cuneiform scripts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 274–288). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Millard, A. R. (1986). The infancy of the alphabet. World Archaeology, 17(3), 390–398.
    • Rollston, Christopher A. (2014b). The Iron Age Phoenician script. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 72–99). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Sass, Benjamin. (1988). The genesis of the alphabet and its development in the second millenium B.C. (Ägyten und Altes Testament 13). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
    • Tonietti, Maria Vittoria. (2015). The Assyrian model: Les syllabaires d'Ebla (2350 av. J.-C.) et les abjads du IIe millénaire av. J.-C. In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 49–72). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Duncan, Lynne G. (2010). Phonological development from a cross-linguistic perspective. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 43–68). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
  • Duncan, Lynne G., Castro, São Luís, Defior, Sylvia, Seymour, Philip H. K., Baillie, Sheila, Leybaert, Jacqueline, Mousty, Philippe, Genard, Nathalie, Sarris, Menelaos, Porpodas, Costas D., Lund, Rannveig, Sigurðsson, Baldur, Þráinsdóttir, Anna S., Sucena, Ana, & Serrano, Francisca. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009 Cited by2
    • Defior, Sylvia, & Serrano, Francisca. (2017). Learning to read Spanish. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 270-298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Pires, Carla, Correia, Susana, Costa, Márcia, Cavaco, Afonso, & Vigário, Marina. (2019). Effects of non-native word shapes in the recognition and recall of medicine names. Written Language & Literacy, 22(1), 95–129. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00021.pir
  • Duncan, L. G., Cole, P., Seymour, P. H. K., & Magnan, A. (2006). Differing sequences of metaphonological development in French and English. Journal of Child Language, 33, 369–399. Cited by8
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, Desrochers, Alain, & Levesque, Kyle. (2017). Learning to read French. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Duncan, Lynne G. (2010). Phonological development from a cross-linguistic perspective. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 43–68). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Duncan, Lynne G., Castro, São Luís, Defior, Sylvia, Seymour, Philip H. K., Baillie, Sheila, Leybaert, Jacqueline, Mousty, Philippe, Genard, Nathalie, Sarris, Menelaos, Porpodas, Costas D., Lund, Rannveig, Sigurðsson, Baldur, Þráinsdóttir, Anna S., Sucena, Ana, & Serrano, Francisca. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009
    • Kerek, Eugenia, & Niemi, Pekka. (2012). Grain-size units of phonological awareness among Russian first graders. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1), 80–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.05ker
    • Seymour, Philip H. K. (2006). Theoretical framework for beginning reading in different orthographies. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 441–462). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Seymour, Philip H. K. (2008). Continuity and discontinuity in the development of single-word reading: Theoretical speculations. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 1–24). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Duncan, Lynne G., & Johnson, Rhona S. (1999). How does phonological awareness relate to nonword reading skill amongst poor readers? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 405–439. Cited by1
    • Welcome, Suzanne E., Chiarello, Christine, Halderman, Laura K., & Leonard, Christiana M. (2009). Lexical processing skill in college-age resilient readers. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9120-3
  • Duncan, L. G., & Seymour, P H. K. (2000). Socio-economic differences in foundation-level literacy. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 145–166. Cited by7
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Blair, Rebecca, & Savage, Robert. (2006). Name writing but not environmental print recognition is related to letter-sound knowledge and phonological awareness in pre-readers. Reading and Writing, 19(9), 991–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9027-9
    • Duncan, Lynne G., Castro, São Luís, Defior, Sylvia, Seymour, Philip H. K., Baillie, Sheila, Leybaert, Jacqueline, Mousty, Philippe, Genard, Nathalie, Sarris, Menelaos, Porpodas, Costas D., Lund, Rannveig, Sigurðsson, Baldur, Þráinsdóttir, Anna S., Sucena, Ana, & Serrano, Francisca. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009
    • Elimelech, Adi, Aram, Dorit, & Levin, Iris. (2020). Mothers teaching their children the Hebrew writing system: The effects on children’s early writing and reading skills. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 263–287). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_17
    • Foulin, Jean Noel. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2
    • Seymour, Philip H. K. (2006). Theoretical framework for beginning reading in different orthographies. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 441–462). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Duncan, L. G., Seymour, P. H. K., & Hill, S. (1997). How important are rhyme and analogy in beginning reading? Cognition, 63, 171–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00001-2 Cited by22
    • Blair, Rebecca, & Savage, Robert. (2006). Name writing but not environmental print recognition is related to letter-sound knowledge and phonological awareness in pre-readers. Reading and Writing, 19(9), 991–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9027-9
    • Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, Michalick, Mirelle Françe, & Pollo, Tatiana Cury. (2002). Is sensitivity to rhyme a developmental precursor to sensitivity to phoneme?: Evidence from individuals with Down syndrome [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 439–454.
    • Daigle, Daniel, & Armand, Françoise. (2008). Phonological sensitivity in severely and profoundly deaf readers of French. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9087-5
    • Deavers, Rachael P., & Brown, Gordon D. A. (1997). Rules versus analogies in children's spelling: Evidence for task dependence [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 339–361.
    • Duncan, Lynne G. (2010). Phonological development from a cross-linguistic perspective. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 43–68). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Duncan, Lynne G., Castro, São Luís, Defior, Sylvia, Seymour, Philip H. K., Baillie, Sheila, Leybaert, Jacqueline, Mousty, Philippe, Genard, Nathalie, Sarris, Menelaos, Porpodas, Costas D., Lund, Rannveig, Sigurðsson, Baldur, Þráinsdóttir, Anna S., Sucena, Ana, & Serrano, Francisca. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009
    • Duncan, Lynne G., & Johnson, Rhona S. (1999). How does phonological awareness relate to nonword reading skill amongst poor readers? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 405–439.
    • Goikietxea, Edurne. (2005). Levels of phonological awareness in preliterate and literate Spanish-speaking children. Reading and Writing, 18(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-1955-7
    • Gombert, Jean-Emile. (2002). Children with Down syndrome use phonological knowledge in reading [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 455–469.
    • Kerek, Eugenia, & Niemi, Pekka. (2012). Grain-size units of phonological awareness among Russian first graders. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1), 80–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.05ker
    • Morais, José. (2003). Levels of phonological representation in skilled reading and in learning to read [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 123–151.
    • Muter, Valerie, & Snowling, Margaret. (1997). Grammar and phonology predict spelling in middle childhood [Special issue: Spelling, editied by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 407–425.
    • Nesan, Mimisha, Sadeghi, Amir, & Everatt, John. (2019). Literacy acquisition in the Malayalam orthography: Cognitive/linguistic influences within a multilingual context. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 85–101). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_5
    • Reid, Agnieszka A. (2006). Developmental dyslexia: Evidence from Polish. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 249–274). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, Kogan, Nadya, & Walters, Joel. (2010). Universal and language-specific constraints on phonemic awareness: Evidence from Russian–Hebrew bilingual children. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9204-8
    • Savage, Robert, & Stuart, Morag. (2001). Orthographic analogies and early reading: Explorations of performance and variation in two transfer tasks. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 571–598.
    • Seymour, Philip H. K. (2006). Theoretical framework for beginning reading in different orthographies. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 441–462). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Seymour, Philip H. K. (2008). Continuity and discontinuity in the development of single-word reading: Theoretical speculations. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 1–24). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., Hulme, Charles, & Mercer, Robin C. (2002). A deficit in rime awareness in children with Down syndrome [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 471–495.
    • Sucena, Ana, Castro, São Luís, & Seymour, Philip. (2009). Developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth: The case of European Portuguese [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9156-4
    • Tsesmeli, Styliani N., & Seymour, Philip H. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 587–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9011-4
  • Duncan, L. G., Seymour, P. H. K., & Hill, S. (2000). A small-to-large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A53, 1081–1104. Cited by12
    • Bijeljac-Babic, Ranka, Millogo, Victor, Farioli, Fernand, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). A developmental investigation of word length effects in reading using a new on-line word identification paradigm. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(4), 411–431.
    • Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, Michalick, Mirelle Françe, & Pollo, Tatiana Cury. (2002). Is sensitivity to rhyme a developmental precursor to sensitivity to phoneme?: Evidence from individuals with Down syndrome [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 439–454.
    • Duncan, Lynne G. (2010). Phonological development from a cross-linguistic perspective. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 43–68). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Duncan, Lynne G., Castro, São Luís, Defior, Sylvia, Seymour, Philip H. K., Baillie, Sheila, Leybaert, Jacqueline, Mousty, Philippe, Genard, Nathalie, Sarris, Menelaos, Porpodas, Costas D., Lund, Rannveig, Sigurðsson, Baldur, Þráinsdóttir, Anna S., Sucena, Ana, & Serrano, Francisca. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009
    • Kerek, Eugenia, & Niemi, Pekka. (2012). Grain-size units of phonological awareness among Russian first graders. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1), 80–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.05ker
    • Rickard Liow, Susan J., & Lee, Lay Choo. (2004). Metalinguistic awareness and semi-syllabic scripts: Children's spelling errors in Malay [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 7–26.
    • Schwanenflugel, Paula J., Morris, Robin D., Kuhn, Melanie R., Strauss, Gregory P., & Sieczko, Jennifer M. (2008). The influence of reading unit size on the development of Stroop interference in early word decoding. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 177–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9061-2
    • Seymour, Philip H. K. (2006). Theoretical framework for beginning reading in different orthographies. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 441–462). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Seymour, Philip H. K. (2008). Continuity and discontinuity in the development of single-word reading: Theoretical speculations. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 1–24). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Tsesmeli, Styliani N., & Seymour, Philip H. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 587–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9011-4
    • Winskel, Heather, & Iemwanthong, Kanyarat. (2010). Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1021–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9194-6
  • Dunn, L. M. (1965). Peabody picture vocabulary test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service. Cited by8
    • Abu Ahmad, Hanadi, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Share, David L. (2014). Cognitive predictors of early reading ability in Arabic: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to grade 2. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 171–194). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A., Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Khateb, Asaid. (2017). What contributes to spelling in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218748
    • Leikin, Mark, Schwartz, Mila, & Share, David L. (2010). General and specific benefits of bi-literate bilingualism: A Russian–Hebrew study of beginning literacy [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9210-x
    • Leikin, Mark, Share, David L., & Schwartz, Mila. (2005). Difficulties in L2 Hebrew reading in Russian-speaking second graders. Reading and Writing, 18(59, 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-8919-4
    • Schwartz, Mila, Geva, Esther, Share, David L., & Leikin, Mark. (2007). Learning to read in English as third language: The cross-linguistic transfer of phonological processing skills. Written Language & Literacy, 10(1), 25–52.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Leikin, Mark, & Share, David L. (2005). Bi-literate bilingualism versus mono-literate bilingualism: A longitudinal study of reading acquisition in Hebrew (L2) among Russian-speaking (L1) children [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 179–206.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Share, David L., Leikin, Mark, & Kozminsky, Ely. (2008). On the benefits of bi-literacy: Just a head start in reading or specific orthographic insights? Reading and Writing, 21(9), 905–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9097-3
    • Shany, Michal, & Biemiller, Andrew. (2010). Individual differences in reading comprehension gains from assisted reading practice: Pre existing conditions, vocabulary acquisition, and amounts of practice. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9196-4
  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test: Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service. [1997, Third edition; 2007, Fourth edition] Cited by35
    • Adlof, Suzanne M., Catts, Hugh W., & Little, Todd D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19(9), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z
    • Barth, Amy Elizabeth, Catts, Hugh W., & Anthony, Jason L. (2009). The component skills underlying reading fluency in adolescent readers: A latent variable analysis. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9125-y
    • Berninger, Virginia, Abbott, Robert D., & Alsdorf, Barbara J. (1997). Lexical- and sentence-level processes in comprehension of written sentences. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 135–162.
    • Carlisle, Joanne F., & Beeman, Margaret M. (2000). The effects of language of instruction on the reading and writing achievement of first-grade Hispanic children [Special issue: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends, edited by Esther Geva & Ludo Verhoeven]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 331–353.
    • Chung, Wei-Lun, & Hu, Chieh-Fang. (2007). Morphological awareness and learning to read Chinese. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9037-7
    • Cormier, P., & Dea, S. (1997). Distinctive patterns of relationship of phonological awareness and working memory with reading development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(3), 193–206.
    • Cupples, Linda, & Iacono, Teresa. (2002). The efficacy of ‘whole word’ versus ‘analytic’ reading instruction for children with Down syndrome [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 549–574.
    • Evans, Mary Ann, Bell, Michelle, Shaw, Deborah, Moretti, Shelley, & Page, Jodi. (2006). Letter names, letter sounds and phonological awareness: An examination of kindergarten children across letters and of letters across children. Reading and Writing, 19(9), 959–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9026-x
    • Fielding-Barnsley, Ruth. (1997). Explicit instruction in decoding benefits children high in phonemic awareness and alphabet knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0101_5
    • Fletcher-Flinn, Claire M., Shankweiler, Donald, & Frost, Stephen J. (2004). Coordination of reading and spelling in early literacy development: An examination of the discrepancy hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 617–644.
    • Foorman, Barbara R., Chen, Dung-Tsa, Carlson, Coleen, Moats, Louisa, Francis, David J., & Fletcher, Jack M. (2003). The necessity of the alphabetic principle to phonemic awareness instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 289–324.
    • Gottardo, Alexandra, Javier, Christine, Farnia, Fataneh, Mak, Lorinda, & Geva, Esther. (2014). Bidirectional cross-linguistic relations of first and second language skills in reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English learners [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 62–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.04got
    • Hecht, Steven A., & Greenfield, Daryl B. (2002). Explaining the predictive accuracy of teacher judgments of their students' reading achievement: The role of gender, classroom behavior, and emergent literacy skills in a longitudinal sample of children exposed to poverty. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 789–809.
    • Holopainen, Leena, Ahonen, Timo, Tolvanen, Asko, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2000). Two alternative ways to model the relation between reading accuracy and phonological awareness at preschool age. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 77–100.
    • Kim, Young-Suk. (2009c). The relationship between home literacy practices and developmental trajectories of emergent literacy and conventional literacy skills for Korean children. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9103-9
    • Kim, Young-Suk, & Petscher, Yaacov. (2011). Relations of emergent literacy skill development with conventional literacy skill development in Korean [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 635–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9240-4
    • Korat, Ofra, Aram, Dorit, Hassunha-Arafat, Safieh, Iraki, Himat Hag-Yehiya, & Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2014). Mother-child literacy activities and early literacy in the Israeli Arab family. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 323–347). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Lyytinen, Heikki, Aro, Mikko, Holopainen, Leena, Leiwo, Matti, Lyytinen, Paula, & Tolvanen, Asko. (2006). Children's language development and reading acquisition in a highly transparent orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 47–62). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Mahony, Diana, Singson, Maria, & Mann, Virgina. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations, 12(3), 191–218.
    • Monnery, Sandrine, Seigneuric, Alix, Zagar, Daniel, & Robichon, Fabrice. (2002). A linguistic dissociation in Williams syndrome: Good at gender agreement but poor at lexical retrieval [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 589–612.
    • Morfidi, Eleni, van der Leij, Aryan, de Jong, Peter F., Scheltinga, Femke, & Bekebrede, Judith. (2007). Reading in two orthographies: A cross-linguistic study of Dutch average and poor readers who learn English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 753–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9035-9
    • Nakamura, Pooja, Joshi, R. Malatesha, & Ji, Xuejun Ryan. (2019). Biliteracy spelling acquisition in akshara and English. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 103–117). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_6
    • Nicholson, Thomas, & Ng, Lian Giok. (2006). The case for teaching phonemic awareness and simple phonics to preschoolers. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 637–648). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • O'Connor, Rollanda E., & Padeliadu, Susana. (2000). Blending versus whole word approaches in first grade remedial reading: Short-term and delayed effects on reading and spelling words. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 159–182.
    • Rahbari, Noriyeh, Sénéchal, Monique, & Arab-Moghaddam, Narges. (2007). The role of orthographic and phonological processing skills in the reading and spelling of monolingual Persian children. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9042-x
    • Reddy, Pooja P., & Koda, Keiko. (2013). Orthographic constraints on phonological awareness in biliteracy development. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.748639
    • Seigneuric, Alix, & Ehrlich, Marie-France. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children's reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 617–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0
    • Singson, Maria, Mahony, Diana, & Mann, Virginia. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 219–252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008196330239
    • Sparks, Richard L. (2001). Phonemic awareness and reading skill in hyperlexic children: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 333–360.
    • Sparks, Richard L. (2004). Orthographic awareness, phonemic awareness, syntactic processing, and working memory skill in hyperlexic children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(4), 359–386.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Tahan, Sandy, Cline, Tony, & Messaoud-Galusi, Souhila. (2011). The relationship between language dominance and pre-reading skills in young bilingual children in Egypt [Special issue: Literacy acquisition in Arabic, edited by Abdessatar Mahfoudhi, John Everatt & Gad Elbeheri]. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 1061–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9301-3
    • Uhry, Joanna K. (1999). Invented spelling in kindergarten: The relationship with finger-point reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 441–464.
    • van der Leij, Aryan, Bekebrede, Judith, & Kotterink, Mieke. (2010). Acquiring reading and vocabulary in Dutch and English: The effect of concurrent instruction. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9207-5
    • Walley, Amanda C., Metsala, Jamie L., & Garlock, Victoria M. (2003). Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021789804977
  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test: Revised (Third edition). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service. [1981, Revised edition; 2007, Fourth edition] Cited by38
    • Blair, Rebecca, & Savage, Robert. (2006). Name writing but not environmental print recognition is related to letter-sound knowledge and phonological awareness in pre-readers. Reading and Writing, 19(9), 991–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9027-9
    • Boudreau, Donna. (2002). Literacy skills in children and adolescents with Down syndrome [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 497–525.
    • Bowers, Peter N., & Kirby, John R. (2010). Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9172-z
    • Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, & da Silva, Juliane Ribeiro. (2010). Cognitive and language correlates of hyperlexia: Evidence from children with autism spectrum disorders. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9154-6
    • Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, Michalick, Mirelle Françe, & Pollo, Tatiana Cury. (2002). Is sensitivity to rhyme a developmental precursor to sensitivity to phoneme?: Evidence from individuals with Down syndrome [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 439–454.
    • Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, Peterson, Robin, Olson, Richard, & Pennington, Bruce. (2009). Component reading skills in Down Syndrome. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9114-6
    • Chow, Bonnie Wing-Yin, McBride-Chang, Catherine, Cheung, Him. (2010). Parent-child reading in English as a second language: Effects on language and literacy development of Chinese kindergarteners. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(3), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01414.x
    • Crosson, Amy C., & Lesaux, Nonie K. (2010). Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers' text-reading fluency in English. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9168-8
    • Davidse, Neeltje J., De Jong, Maria T., Bus, Adriana G., Huijbregts, Stephan C. J., & Swaab, Hanna. (2011). Cognitive and environmental predictors of early literacy skills [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9233-3
    • Goff, Deborah A., Pratt, Chris, & Ong, Ben. (2005). The relations between children's reading comprehension, working memory, language skills and components of reading decoding in a normal sample. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 583–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-7109-0
    • Gonzalez, Jorge E., Goetz, Ernest T., Hall, Robert J., Payne, Tara, Taylor, Aaron B., Kim, Minjung, & McCormick, Anita S. (2011). An evaluation of Early Reading First (ERF) preschool enrichment on language and literacy skills. Reading and Writing, 24(3), 253–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9212-8
    • Goodman, Ilana, Libenson, Amanda, & Wade-Woolley, Lesly. (2010). Sensitivity to linguistic stress, phonological awareness and early reading ability in preschoolers. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01423.x
    • Henning, Caroline, McIntosh, Beth, Arnott, Wendy, & Dodd, Barbara. (2010). Long-term outcome of oral language and phonological awareness intervention with socially disadvantaged preschoolers: The impact on language and literacy. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01410.x
    • Hipfner-Boucher, Kathleen, Lam, Katie, & Chen, Xi. (2014). The effects of bilingual education on the English language and literacy outcomes of Chinese-speaking children [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.06hip
    • Kang, Jennifer Yusun. (2012). Do bilingual children possess better phonological awareness? Investigation of Korean monolingual and Korean-English bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9277-4
    • Kieffer, Michael J., & Lesaux, Noneie K. (2008). The role of derivational morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing, 21(8), 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9092-8
    • Kirby, John R., Deacon, S. Hélène, Bowers, Peter N., Izenberg, Leah, Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Children's morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5
    • Leyva, Diana, Hopson, Sarah, & Nichols, Ashley. (2012). Reading a note, reading a mind: children's notating skills and understanding of mind. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9296-9
    • Luo, Yang Cathy, Chen, Xi, & Geva, Esther. (2014). Concurrent and longitudinal cross-linguistic transfer of phonological awareness and morphological awareness in Chinese-English bilingual children [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.05luo
    • Mancilla-Martinez, Jeannette, Kieffer, Michael J., Biancarosa, Gina, Christodoulou, Joanna A., & Snow, Catherine E. (2011). Investigating English reading comprehension growth in adolescent language minority learners: Some insights from the simple view. Reading and Writing, 24(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9215-5
    • McBride-Chang, C., Cheung, H., Chow, B. W.-Y., Chow, C. S.-L., & Choi, L. (2006). Metalinguistic skills and vocabulary knowledge in Chinese (L1) and English (L2) [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 695–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5742-x
    • Oakhill, Jane, & Cain, Kate. (2017). Children with specific text comprehension problems. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 359–375). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Pierce, Margaret E., Katzir, Tami, Wolf, Maryanne, & Noam, Gil G. (2007). Clusters of second and third grade dysfluent urban readers. Reading and Writing, 20(9), 885–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9058-x
    • Post, Yolanda V., & Carreker, Suzanne. (2002). Orthographic similarity and phonological transparency in spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 317–340.
    • Ramirez, Gloria, Chen, Xi, Geva, Esther, & Kiefer, Heidi. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9
    • Reilly, Judy, & Polse, Lara. (2016). Perspectives on spoken and written language: Evidence from English speaking children. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 125–140). Cham: Springer.
    • Rydland, Veslemøy, Aukrust, Vibeke Grøver, & Fulland, Helene. (2012). How word decoding, vocabulary and prior topic knowledge predict reading comprehension. A study of language-minority students in Norwegian fifth grade classrooms. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9279-2
    • Sénéchal, Monique, Ouellette, Gene, Pagan, Stephanie, & Lever, Rosemary. (2012). The role of invented spelling on learning to read in low-phoneme awareness kindergartners: A randomized-control-trial study. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9310-2
    • Spear-Swerling, Louise. (2006). Children's reading comprehension and oral reading fluency in easy text. Reading and Writing, 19(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4114-x
    • Spear-Swerling, Louise, Brucker, Pamela O., & Alfano, Michael P. (2010). Relationships between sixth-graders' reading comprehension and two different measures of print exposure. Reading and Writing, 23(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9152-8
    • Sun-Alperin, M. Kendra, & Wang, Min. (2011). Cross-language transfer of phonological and orthographic processing skills from Spanish L1 to English L2. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9221-7
    • Townsend, Dianna, & Collins, Penny. (2009). Academic vocabulary and middle school English learners: An intervention study. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 993–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9141-y
    • Vadasy, Patricia F., & Sanders, Elizabeth A. (2008). Code-oriented instruction for kindergarten students at risk for reading difficulties: A replication and comparison of instructional groupings. Reading and Writing, 21(9), 929–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9119-9
    • Vellutino, Frank R., Scanlon, Donna M., Zhang, Haiyan, & Schatschneider, Christopher. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties [Special issue: Recent developments in reading intervention research, edited by William E. Tunmer]. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 437–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9098-2
    • Walker, Joanne, & Hauerwas, Laura Boynton. (2006). Development of phonological, morphological, and orthographic knowledge in young spellers: The case of inflected verbs. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 819–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9006-1
    • Wang, Min, Anderson, Alida, Cheng, Chenxi, Park, Yoonjung, & Thomson, Jennifer. (2008). General auditory processing, Chinese tone processing, English phonemic processing and English reading skill: A comparison between Chinese-English and Korean-English bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(6), 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9081-y
    • Wang, Min, & Geva, Esther. (2003a). Spelling acquisition of novel English phonemes in Chinese children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 325–348.
    • Woodrome, Stacey E., & Johnson, Kathy E. (2009). The role of visual discrimination in the learning-to-read process. Reading and Writing, 22(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9104-8
  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test: Revised (Fourth edition). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service. [1981, Revised edition; 1997, Third edition] Cited by6
    • Commissaire, Eva, Pasquarella, Adrian, Chen, Xi, & Deacon, S. Hélène. (2014). The development of orthographic processing skills in children in early French immersion programs [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.02com
    • Hipfner-Boucher, Kathleen, Lam, Katie, Chen, Xi, & Deacon, S. Hélène. (2015). Exploring the effects of word features on French immersion children's ability to deconstruct morphologically complex words [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.943645
    • Hooper, Stephen R., Costa, Lara-Jeane, McBee, Matthew, Anderson, Kathleen L., Yerby, Donna C., Knuth, Sean B., & Childress, Amy. (2011). Concurrent and longitudinal neuropsychological contributors to written language expression in first and second grade students [Special issue: Writing development from early to middle childhood, edited by Virgina W. Berninger, Brett Miller & Victoria J. Molfese]. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 221–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9263-x
    • Ouellette, Gene, & Beers, Ashley. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1
    • Reese, Elaine, Suggate, Sebastian, Long, Jennifer, & Schaughency, Elizabeth. (2010). Children's oral narrative and reading skills in the first 3 years of reading instruction. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9175-9
    • Sadeghi, Amir, Everatt, John, & McNeill, Brigid. (2016). A simple model of Persian reading. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.1003768
  • Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M, Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1982). British picture vocabulary scale (Second edition). Windsor: NFER-Nelson. [1982, First edition, Dunn, L., Dunn, L., Whetton, C., & Pintilie, D.] Cited by8
    • Botting, N., Simkin, Z., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2006). Associated reading skills in children with a history of Specific Language Impairment (SLI) [Special issue: Reading comprehension - Part II]. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4322-4
    • Bourke, Lorna, & Adams, Anne-Marie. (2010). Cognitive constraints and the early learning goals in writing [Special Issue:Writing development: Cognitive, sociocultural, linguistic perspectives, edited b Debra Myhill & Ros Fisher]. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01434.x
    • Duff, Fiona J., Hayiou-Thomas, Marianna E., & Hulme, Charles. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of a phonologically based reading intervention for struggling readers with varying language profiles. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9291-6
    • Goetz, Kristina, Hulme, Charles, Brigstocke, Sophie, Carroll, Julia M., Nasir, Louise, & Snowling, M. (2008). Training reading and phoneme awareness skills in children with Down syndrome [Special issue: Recent developments in reading intervention research, edited by William E. Tunmer]. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9089-3
    • Hanley, J. Richard. (2010). Differences in reading ability between children attending Welsh- and English-speaking primary schools in Wales. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 87–107). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Oakhill, Jane, & Cain, Kate. (2017). Children with specific text comprehension problems. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 359–375). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Roncoli, Silvia, & Masterson, Jackie. (2016). ‘Unexpected’ spelling difficulty in a 10-year-old child with good reading skills: An intervention case study. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1159539
    • Rydland, Veslemøy, Aukrust, Vibeke Grøver, & Fulland, Helene. (2012). How word decoding, vocabulary and prior topic knowledge predict reading comprehension. A study of language-minority students in Norwegian fifth grade classrooms. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9279-2
  • Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M, Whetton, C., & Pintilie, D. (1982). British picture vocabulary scale (First edition). Windsor: NFER-Nelson. [1997, Second edition, Dunn, L., Dunn, L., Whetton, C., & Burley, J.] Cited by16
    • Brennan, Fiona, & Ireson, Judith. (1997). Training phonological awareness: A study to evaluate the effects of a program of metalinguistic games in kindergarten. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(4), 241–263.
    • Cain, Kate, & Oakhill, Jane V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
    • Cain, Kate, Oakhill, Jane, & Bryant, Peter. (2000b). Phonological skills and comprehension failure: A test of the phonological processing deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008051414854
    • Connelly, Vincent, Johnston, Rhona, & Thompson, G. Brian. (2001). The effect of phonics instruction on the reading comprehension of beginning readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 423–457.
    • Goswami, Usha, Gerson, Danielle, & Astruc, Luisa. (2010). Amplitude envelope perception, phonology and prosodic sensitivity in children with developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 995–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9186-6
    • Johnston, Rhona S., & Watson, Joyce E. (2004). Accelerating the development of reading, spelling and phonemic awareness skills in initial readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(4), 327–357.
    • Johnston, Rhona S., & Watson, Joyce E. (2006). The effectiveness of synthetic phonics teaching in developing reading and spelling skills in English-speaking boys and girls. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 679–691). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Laws, Glynis, & Gunn, Deborah. (2002). Relationships between reading, phonological skills and language development in individuals with Down syndrome: A five year follow-up study [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 527–548.
    • Monnery, Sandrine, Seigneuric, Alix, Zagar, Daniel, & Robichon, Fabrice. (2002). A linguistic dissociation in Williams syndrome: Good at gender agreement but poor at lexical retrieval [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 589–612.
    • Oakhill, Jane, & Cain, Kate. (2017). Children with specific text comprehension problems. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 359–375). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Savage, Robert, & Stuart, Morag. (2001). Orthographic analogies and early reading: Explorations of performance and variation in two transfer tasks. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 571–598.
    • Seigneuric, Alix, & Ehrlich, Marie-France. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children's reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 617–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Lundquis, Eric. (1992). On the relations between learning to spell and learning to read. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 179–192). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., Hulme, Charles, & Mercer, Robin C. (2002). A deficit in rime awareness in children with Down syndrome [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 471–495.
    • Thompson, G. Brian, & Johnston, Rhona S. (2007). Visual and orthographic information in learning to read and the influence of phonics instruction. Reading and Writing, 20(9), 859–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9050-5
    • Thompson, G. Brian, McKay, Michael F., Fletcher-Flinn, Claire M., Connelly, Vincent, Kaa, Richard T., & Ewing, Jason. (2008). Do children who acquire word reading without explicit phonics employ compensatory learning? Issues of phonological recoding, lexical orthography, and fluency. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 505–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9075-9
  • Dunn-Ranklin, P. (1978). The visual characteristics of words. Scientific American, 238, 122–130. Cited by4
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [1987, Reprinted with corrections; 2015, Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing]
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Treurniet, William C. (1980). Spacing of characters on a television display. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 365–374). New York; London: Plenum Press.
  • Dupont, Florence. (2009). The corrupted boy and the crowned poet: or, the material reality and the symbolic status of the literary book at Rome (Translated by Holt N. Parker). In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 143–163). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Durgunoğlu, A. Y. (1998). Acquiring literacy in English and Spanish in the United States. In A. Y. Durgunoğlu & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Literacy development in a multilingual context: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 135–145). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by7
    • Carlisle, Joanne F., & Beeman, Margaret M. (2000). The effects of language of instruction on the reading and writing achievement of first-grade Hispanic children [Special issue: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends, edited by Esther Geva & Ludo Verhoeven]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 331–353.
    • Figueredo, L. (2006). Using the known to chart the unknown: A review of first-language influence on the development of English-as-a-second-language spelling skill. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 873–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9014-1
    • Kang, Jennifer Yusun. (2012). Do bilingual children possess better phonological awareness? Investigation of Korean monolingual and Korean-English bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9277-4
    • Kim, Young-Suk, & Pallante, Daniel. (2012). Predictors of reading skills for kindergartners and first grade students in Spanish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9244-0
    • Leikin, Mark, Schwartz, Mila, & Share, David L. (2010). General and specific benefits of bi-literate bilingualism: A Russian–Hebrew study of beginning literacy [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9210-x
    • Schwartz, Mila, Leikin, Mark, & Share, David L. (2005). Bi-literate bilingualism versus mono-literate bilingualism: A longitudinal study of reading acquisition in Hebrew (L2) among Russian-speaking (L1) children [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 179–206.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Share, David L., Leikin, Mark, & Kozminsky, Ely. (2008). On the benefits of bi-literacy: Just a head start in reading or specific orthographic insights? Reading and Writing, 21(9), 905–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9097-3
  • Durgunoğlu, A. Y. (2002). Cross-linguistic transfer in literacy development and implications for language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-002-0012-y Cited by18
    • Cho, Jeung-Ryeul. (2018). Cognitive-linguistic skills and reading and writing in Korean Hangul, Chinese Hanja, and English among Korean children. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 391–410). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Dich, Nadya. (2010). Development of sensitivity to phonological context in learning to spell in English: Evidence from Russian ESL speakers. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.04dic
    • Figueredo, L. (2006). Using the known to chart the unknown: A review of first-language influence on the development of English-as-a-second-language spelling skill. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 873–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9014-1
    • Geva, Esther. (2014). Introduction: The cross-language transfer journey – a guide to the perplexed [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.01gev
    • Gottardo, Alexandra, Javier, Christine, Farnia, Fataneh, Mak, Lorinda, & Geva, Esther. (2014). Bidirectional cross-linguistic relations of first and second language skills in reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English learners [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 62–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.04got
    • Hipfner-Boucher, Kathleen, Lam, Katie, Chen, Xi, & Deacon, S. Hélène. (2015). Exploring the effects of word features on French immersion children's ability to deconstruct morphologically complex words [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.943645
    • Kang, Jennifer Yusun. (2012). Do bilingual children possess better phonological awareness? Investigation of Korean monolingual and Korean-English bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9277-4
    • Koh, Poh Wee, Chen, Xi, & Gottardo, Alexandra. (2018). How do phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and vocabulary knowledge relate to word reading within and between English and Chinese? In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 73–98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Lau, Lily H.-S., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2005). Phonological awareness and spelling skill development in bilingual biscriptal children. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (357–371). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Mirza, Amna, & Gottardo, Alexandra. (2019). Learning to read in their heritage language: Hindi-English speaking children reading two different orthographies. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 329–351). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_17
    • Nakamoto, Jonathan, Lindsey, Kim A., & Manis, Franklin R. (2012). Development of reading skills from K-3 in Spanish-speaking English language learners following three programs of instruction. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9285-4
    • Russak, Susie, amp; Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2011). Phonological awareness in Hebrew (L1) and English (L2) in normal and disabled readers [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9235-1
    • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, Esther. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, & Geva, Esther. (2010). Acquiring reading in two languages: An introduction to the special issue [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9208-4
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, Kogan, Nadya, & Walters, Joel. (2010). Universal and language-specific constraints on phonemic awareness: Evidence from Russian–Hebrew bilingual children. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9204-8
    • Sun-Alperin, M. Kendra, & Wang, Min. (2011). Cross-language transfer of phonological and orthographic processing skills from Spanish L1 to English L2. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9221-7
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Zaretsky, Elena. (2014). The role of L1 and L2 reading on L1 preservation and positive cross-linguistic transfer among sequential bilinguals [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.07zar
  • Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan. (2006). How language characteristics influence Turkish literacy development. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 219–229). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by4
    • Candan, Ecehan, Babür, Nalan, Haznedar, Belma, & Erçetin , Gülcan. (2020). Reading and spelling skills in transparent orthographies: Phonological encoding and rapid automatized naming in Turkish. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 185–201). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_12
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Piper, Benjamin, & van Ginkel, Agatha J. (2017). Reading the script: How the scripts and writing systems of Ethiopian languages relate to letter and word identification. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 36–59, https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1220354
    • Seidenberg, Mark S. (2013). The science of reading and its educational implications [Special issue: Learning to read and write: Connections between written and spoken language]. Language Learning and Development, 9(4), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2013.812017
  • Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesa. (2017). Learning to read Turkish. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 437–454). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Durgunoğlu, A. Y., & Hancin, B. J. (1992). An overview of cross-language transfer in bilingual reading. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processes in bilinguals (pp. 391–411). Amsterdam: North Holland. Cited by4
    • Geva, Esther, & Siegel, Linda S. (2000). Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in two languages. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008017710115
    • Geva, Esther, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2000). Introduction: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends [Special issue: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends, edited by Esther Geva & Ludo Verhoeven]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 261–266.
    • Lefrançois, Pascale, & Armand, Françoise. (2003). The role of phonological and syntactic awareness in second-language reading: The case of Spanish-speaking learners of French. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 219–246.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling [Special issue: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends, edited by Esther Geva & Ludo Verhoeven]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0404_4
  • Durgunoğlu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.453 Cited by47
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, & Siegel, Linda S. (2003). Reading skills in three orthographies: The case of trilingual Arabic-Hebrew-English-speaking Arab children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(7), 611–634.
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, & Taha, Haitham. (2006b). Reading in Arabic orthography: Characteristics, research findings, and assessment. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron, (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 321–338). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Baker, Doris Luft, Park, Yonghan, & Baker, Scott K. (2012). The reading performance of English learners in grades 1-3: The role of initial status and growth on reading fluency in Spanish and English. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9261-z
    • Bekebrede, Judith, van der Leij, Aryan, & Share, David L. (2009). Dutch dyslexic adolescents: Phonological-core variable-orthographic differences. Reading and Writing, 22(2), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9105-7
    • Cho, Jeung-Ryeul. (2018). Cognitive-linguistic skills and reading and writing in Korean Hangul, Chinese Hanja, and English among Korean children. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 391–410). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Cormier, Pierre, & Kelson, Suzanne. (2000). The roles of phonological and syntactic awareness in the use of plural morphemes among children in French immersion [Special issue: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends, edited by Esther Geva & Ludo Verhoeven]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 267–293.
    • Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan, & Öney, Banu. (1999). A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 281–299.
    • Figueredo, L. (2006). Using the known to chart the unknown: A review of first-language influence on the development of English-as-a-second-language spelling skill. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 873–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9014-1
    • Geva, Esther. (2014). Introduction: The cross-language transfer journey – a guide to the perplexed [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.01gev
    • Geva, Esther, & Siegel, Linda S. (2000). Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in two languages. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008017710115
    • Geva, Esther, Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Shany, Michal. (1997). Development of reading efficiency in first and second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_2
    • Gottardo, Alexandra, Javier, Christine, Farnia, Fataneh, Mak, Lorinda, & Geva, Esther. (2014). Bidirectional cross-linguistic relations of first and second language skills in reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English learners [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 62–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.04got
    • Hipfner-Boucher, Kathleen, Lam, Katie, & Chen, Xi. (2014). The effects of bilingual education on the English language and literacy outcomes of Chinese-speaking children [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.06hip
    • Hu, Chieh-Fang. (2008). Use orthography in L2 auditory word learning: Who benefits? Reading and Writing, 21(8), 823–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9094-6
    • Joshi, R. Malatesha, Høien, Torleiv, Feng, Xiwu, Chengappa, Rajni, & Boulware-Gooden, Regina. (2006). Learning to spell by ear any by eye: A cross-linguistic comparison. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 569–577). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Kang, Jennifer Yusun. (2012). Do bilingual children possess better phonological awareness? Investigation of Korean monolingual and Korean-English bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9277-4
    • Kim, Young-Suk. (2009a). Crosslinguistic influence on phonological awareness for Korean–English bilingual children [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 843–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9132-z
    • Kim, Young-Suk, & Pallante, Daniel. (2012). Predictors of reading skills for kindergartners and first grade students in Spanish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9244-0
    • Koda, Keiko. (2005). Learning to read across writing systems: Transfer, metalinguistic awareness, and second-language reading development. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (311–334). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Koda, Keiko. (2009). Learning to read in new writing systems. In Michael H. Long & Catherine J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching. Blackwell Publishing.
    • Koda, Keiko. (2013). Second language reading, scripts, and orthographies. In Carol A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1053
    • Koda, Keiko, & Miller, Ryan T. (2018). Cross-linguistic interactions in L2 word meaning inference in English as a foreign language. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 293–312). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Lau, Lily H.-S., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2005). Phonological awareness and spelling skill development in bilingual biscriptal children. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (357–371). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Lefrançois, Pascale, & Armand, Françoise. (2003). The role of phonological and syntactic awareness in second-language reading: The case of Spanish-speaking learners of French. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 219–246.
    • Lesaux, Nonie K., Lipka, Orly, & Siegel, Linda S. (2006). Investigating cognitive and linguistic abilities that influence the reading comprehension skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds [Special issue: Reading comprehension - Part II]. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4713-6
    • Lipka, Orly, & Siegel, Linda S. (2010). Early identification and intervention to prevent reading difficulties. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 205–219). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_15
    • Low, Pauline B., & Siegel, Linda S. (2005). A comparison of the cognitive processes underlying reading comprehension in native English and ESL speakers [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 207–231.
    • Luo, Yang Cathy, Chen, Xi, & Geva, Esther. (2014). Concurrent and longitudinal cross-linguistic transfer of phonological awareness and morphological awareness in Chinese-English bilingual children [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.05luo
    • McBride-Chang, C., Cheung, H., Chow, B. W.-Y., Chow, C. S.-L., & Choi, L. (2006). Metalinguistic skills and vocabulary knowledge in Chinese (L1) and English (L2) [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 695–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5742-x
    • Mirza, Amna, & Gottardo, Alexandra. (2019). Learning to read in their heritage language: Hindi-English speaking children reading two different orthographies. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 329–351). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_17
    • Morfidi, Eleni, van der Leij, Aryan, de Jong, Peter F., Scheltinga, Femke, & Bekebrede, Judith. (2007). Reading in two orthographies: A cross-linguistic study of Dutch average and poor readers who learn English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 753–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9035-9
    • Nakamoto, Jonathan, Lindsey, Kim A., & Manis, Franklin R. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of English language learners' word decoding and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 20(7), 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9045-7
    • Ramirez, Gloria, Chen, Xi, Geva, Esther, & Kiefer, Heidi. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9
    • Reddy, Pooja P., & Koda, Keiko. (2013). Orthographic constraints on phonological awareness in biliteracy development. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.748639
    • Russak, Susie, amp; Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2011). Phonological awareness in Hebrew (L1) and English (L2) in normal and disabled readers [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9235-1
    • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, Esther. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
    • Schwartz, Mila, Geva, Esther, Share, David L., & Leikin, Mark. (2007). Learning to read in English as third language: The cross-linguistic transfer of phonological processing skills. Written Language & Literacy, 10(1), 25–52.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sun-Alperin, M. Kendra, & Wang, Min. (2011). Cross-language transfer of phonological and orthographic processing skills from Spanish L1 to English L2. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9221-7
    • Tahan, Sandy, Cline, Tony, & Messaoud-Galusi, Souhila. (2011). The relationship between language dominance and pre-reading skills in young bilingual children in Egypt [Special issue: Literacy acquisition in Arabic, edited by Abdessatar Mahfoudhi, John Everatt & Gad Elbeheri]. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 1061–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9301-3
    • van der Leij, Aryan, Bekebrede, Judith, & Kotterink, Mieke. (2010). Acquiring reading and vocabulary in Dutch and English: The effect of concurrent instruction. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9207-5
    • Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Geva, Esther. (2000). Processing novel phonemic contrasts in the acquisition of L2 word reading [Special issue: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends, edited by Esther Geva & Ludo Verhoeven]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0404_3
    • Wang, Min, Anderson, Alida, Cheng, Chenxi, Park, Yoonjung, & Thomson, Jennifer. (2008). General auditory processing, Chinese tone processing, English phonemic processing and English reading skill: A comparison between Chinese-English and Korean-English bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(6), 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9081-y
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Yuan, Han, Segers, Eliane, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2020). Factors affecting L2 phonological awareness in Chinese-Dutch preschoolers. Written Language & Literacy, 23(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00035.yua
    • Zaretsky, Elena. (2014). The role of L1 and L2 reading on L1 preservation and positive cross-linguistic transfer among sequential bilinguals [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.07zar
    • Zhang, Jie, Anderson, Richard C., Li, Hong, Dong, Qiong, Wu, Xinchun, & Zhang, Yan. (2010). Cross-language transfer of insight into the structure of compound words [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9205-7
  • Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan, & Öney, Banu. (1999). A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 281–299. Cited by22
    • Anthony, Jason L., Williams, Jeffrey M., Aghara, Rachel G., Dunkelberger, Martha, Novak, Barbara, & Mukherjee, Anuja Divatia. (2010). Assessment of individual differences in phonological representation. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 969–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9185-7
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Babayiğit, Selma, & Stainthorp, Rhona. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y
    • Candan, Ecehan, Babür, Nalan, Haznedar, Belma, & Erçetin , Gülcan. (2020). Reading and spelling skills in transparent orthographies: Phonological encoding and rapid automatized naming in Turkish. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 185–201). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_12
    • Caravolas, Markéta, & Samara, Anna. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 326–343). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Duncan, Lynne G. (2010). Phonological development from a cross-linguistic perspective. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 43–68). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Duncan, Lynne G., Castro, São Luís, Defior, Sylvia, Seymour, Philip H. K., Baillie, Sheila, Leybaert, Jacqueline, Mousty, Philippe, Genard, Nathalie, Sarris, Menelaos, Porpodas, Costas D., Lund, Rannveig, Sigurðsson, Baldur, Þráinsdóttir, Anna S., Sucena, Ana, & Serrano, Francisca. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009
    • Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan. (2006). How language characteristics influence Turkish literacy development. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 219–229). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesa. (2017). Learning to read Turkish. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 437–454). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2006). Orthography, phonology, and reading development: A cross-linguistics perspective. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 463–480). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2008). Phonological representations for reading acquisition across languages. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 65–84). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2010). A psycholinguistic grain size view of reading acquisition across languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 23–42). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Kerek, Eugenia, & Niemi, Pekka. (2012). Grain-size units of phonological awareness among Russian first graders. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1), 80–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.05ker
    • Lefrançois, Pascale, & Armand, Françoise. (2003). The role of phonological and syntactic awareness in second-language reading: The case of Spanish-speaking learners of French. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 219–246.
    • Mann, Virginia, & Wimmer, Heinz. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 653–682.
    • Öney, Banu, & Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan. (2005). Research and theory informing instruction in adult literacy. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 127–147). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, Esther. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, Kogan, Nadya, & Walters, Joel. (2010). Universal and language-specific constraints on phonemic awareness: Evidence from Russian–Hebrew bilingual children. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9204-8
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
    • Winskel, Heather. (2009). Reading in Thai: The case of misaligned vowels. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9100-z
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Durgunoğlu, A. Y., & Öney, B. (2002). Phonological awareness in literacy acquisition: It's not only for children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0603_3 Cited by5
    • Ahlberg, Aija Katriina. (2020). How abugida readers learn alphabetic literacy skills: The role of phonological awareness in the transfer process in the Konso language, Southwest Ethiopia (JYU Dissertations 237). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-8188-4
    • Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan. (2006). How language characteristics influence Turkish literacy development. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 219–229). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Jiménez, Juan E., García, Eduardo, & Venegas, Enrique. (2010). Are phonological processes the same or different in low literacy adults and children with or without reading disabilities? Reading and Writing, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9146-6
    • Öney, Banu, & Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan. (2005). Research and theory informing instruction in adult literacy. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 127–147). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Tammelin-Laine, Taina, & Martin, Maisa. (2015). The simultaneous development of receptive skills in an orthographically transparent second language. [Special issue: Adolescents and adults who develop literacy for the first time in L2, edited by Martha Young-Scholten]. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.943148
  • Durgunoğlu, A. Y., & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.). (1998). Literacy development in a multilingual context: Cross-cultural perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by6
    • de Zeeuw, Marlies, Schreuder, Robert, & Verhoeven, Ludo T. W. (2015). Lexical processing of nominal compounds in first- and second-language learners across primary grades [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.926806
    • Hornberger, Nancy H. (2001). [Book review: Aydin Yücesan Durgunoğlu & Ludo Verhoeven (Eds.), (1998), Literacy development in a multilingual context: Cross-cultural perspectives]. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 125–129.
    • Mehlem, Ulrich. (2007). The graphematic representation of prepositional phrases in experimental writing of Tarifit Berber by Moroccan students in Germany and Morocco [Special issue: Constraints on spelling changes, edited by Guido Nottbusch & Eliane Segers]. Written Language & Literacy, 10(2), 195–218.
    • Netten, Andrea, Droop, Mienke, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2011). Predictors of reading literacy for first and second language learners [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9234-2
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling [Special issue: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends, edited by Esther Geva & Ludo Verhoeven]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0404_4
    • Zhou, Minglang. (2001). Language policy and reforms of writing systems for minority languages in China. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 31–65.
  • Durkin, D. (1966). Children who read early. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. Cited by6
    • Dehn, Mechthild, & Sjölin, Amelie. (1996). Frühes Lesen und Schreiben [Early reading and writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1141–1153). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Gibson, Eleanor J., & Levin, Harry. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Taylor, Insup. (1988). Psychology of literacy: East and west. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 202–233). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1995). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.3 [2014, Revised edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14)]
  • Durkin, Philip. (2016). Spelling variation as documented in historical dictionaries: The OED as a test case. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 163–173). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Dürscheid, Christa. (2002). Einführung in die Schriftlinguistik [Introduction to grapholinguistics] (Second edition). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. [2006, Third edition; 2012, Fourth edition; 2016, Fifth edition] Cited by5
    • Blatt, Inge, Müller, Astrid, & Voss, Andreas. (2010). Schriftstruktur als Lesehilfe. Konzeption und Ergebnisse eines Hamburger Leseförderprojekts in Klasse 5 (HeLp). In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller, & Gabriele Hinney (Eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch - didaktisch - empirisch [Writing system and writing acquisition: Linguistic, didactic, empirical]. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 289) (pp. 171–202). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Condorelli, Marco (Ed.). (2020). Advances in historical orthography, c. 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674171
    • Neef, Martin. (2021). The written utterance as a core concept in grapholinguistics. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 1–24). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-neef
    • Noack, Christina. (2010). Orthographie als Leserinstruktion: Die Leistung schriftsprachlicher Strukturen für den Dekodierprozess. In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller, & Gabriele Hinney (Eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch - didaktisch - empirisch [Writing system and writing acquisition: Linguistic, didactic, empirical]. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 289) (pp. 151–170). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Schmidt, Karsten. (2014). Morphophonographic regularities in German: The graphematic syllable boundary. A non-linear graphematic approach [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 253–281. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.04sch
  • Dürscheid, Christa. (2006). Einführung in die Schriftlinguistik [Introduction to grapholinguistics] (Third edition). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. [2002, Second edition; 2012, Fourth edition; 2016, Fifth edition] Cited by6
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Elti di Rodeano, Sveva. (2019). Digraphia: The story of a sociolinguistic typology. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 111–126). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-elti
    • Michel, Andreas. (2012). Italian orthography in Early Modern times. In Susan Baddeley & Anja Voeste (Eds.), Orthographies in Early Modern Europe (pp. 63–96). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Neef, Martin. (2012b). Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems. Writing Systems Research, 4(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.706658
    • Primus, Beatrice. (2010). Strukturelle Grundlagen des deutschen Schriftsystems. In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller & Gabriele Hinney (Eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch - didaktisch - empirisch [Writing system and writing acquisition: Linguistic, didactic, empirical]. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 289) (pp. 9–45). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter; .Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110232257.9
    • Schäfer, Roland, & Sayatz, Ulrike. (2016). Punctuation and syntactic structure in obwohl and weil clauses in nonstandard written German. Written Language & Literacy, 19(2), 212–245. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.2.04sch
  • Dürscheid, Christa. (2012). Einführung in die Schriftlinguistik [Introduction to grapholinguistics] (Fourth edition). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. [2002, Second edition; 2006, Third edition; 2016, Fifth edition] Cited by4
    • Bergerhausen, Johannes, & Huot-Marchand, Thomas. (2021). The missing scripts project. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 439–454). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-huot
    • Evertz, Martin. (2018). Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441
    • Neef, Martin. (2015). Writing systems as modular objects: Proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics, 1, 708–721. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2015-0026
    • Schmidt, Karsten. (2014). Morphophonographic regularities in German: The graphematic syllable boundary. A non-linear graphematic approach [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 253–281. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.04sch
  • Dürscheid, Christa. (2016). Einführung in die Schriftlinguistik [Introduction to grapholinguistics] (Fifth edition). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. [2002, Second edition; 2006, Third edition; 2012, Fourth edition] Cited by8
    • Dürscheid, Christa, & Meletis, Dimitrios. (2019). Emojis: A grapholinguistic approach. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 167–183). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-duer
    • Haralambous, Yannis, & Dürst, Martin. (2019). Unicode from a linguistic point of view. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 127–166). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-hara1
    • Kropp, Amina. (2018). Schriftlichkeit in der Schadenzauberpraxis am Beispiel der vulgärlateinischen defixionum tabellae. In Anne Kolb (Ed.), Literacy in ancient everyday life (pp. 261–286). Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2018). What is natural in writing? Prolegomena to a Natural Grapholinguistics [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00010.mel
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020). Types of allography. Open Linguistics, 6, 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0006
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2021). On being a grapholinguist. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 125–141). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-mele
    • Neef, Martin. (2021). The written utterance as a core concept in grapholinguistics. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 1–24). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-neef
  • Dürscheid, Christa. (2021). Emojis are everywhere. How emojis conquer new contexts. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 501–512). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-duer
  • Dürscheid, Christa, & Meletis, Dimitrios. (2019). Emojis: A grapholinguistic approach. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 167–183). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-duer Cited by2
    • Dürscheid, Christa. (2021). Emojis are everywhere. How emojis conquer new contexts. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 501–512). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-duer
    • Neef, Martin. (2021). The written utterance as a core concept in grapholinguistics. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 1–24). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-neef
  • Dutka, Julia To. (1980). Anaphoric relations, comprehension and readability. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 537–549). New York; London: Plenum Press. Cited by1
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
  • Dutta, Hemanga. (2019). Assamese orthography: An introduction and some applications for literacy development. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 181–194). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_10
  • Düwel, Klaus. (1968). Runenkunde. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler. [1983, Second edition; 2001, Third edition; 2008, Fourth edition, (Sammlung Metzler 72)] Cited by3
    • Antonsen, Elmer H. (2002). Runes and Germanic linguistics (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and monographs 140). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    • Elliott, Ralph W. V. (1996). The Runic script. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 333–339). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Düwel, Klaus. (1983). Runenkunde (Second edition). Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler. [1968, First edition; 2001, Third edition; 2008, Fourth edition, (Sammlung Metzler 72)] Cited by6
    • Antonsen, Elmer H. (1989). The runes: The earliest Germanic writing system. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 137–158). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    • Antonsen, Elmer H. (2002). Runes and Germanic linguistics (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and monographs 140). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    • Elliott, Ralph W. V. (1996). The Runic script. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 333–339). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Geier, Manfred. (1994b). Sekundäre Funktionen der Schrift [Secondary functions of writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 678–686). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Düwel, Klaus. (2001). Runenkunde (Third edition). Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler. [1968, First edition; 1983, Second edition; 2008, Fourth edition, (Sammlung Metzler 72)] Cited by4
    • Antonsen, Elmer H. (2002). Runes and Germanic linguistics (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and monographs 140). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    • Fear, Douglas. (2015). utā pavastāyā utā carmā grftam āha—Written on clay and parchment: Old Persian writing and allography in Iranian. In Susanne Enderwitz & Rebecca Sauer (Eds.), Communication and materiality: Written and unwritten communication in pre-modern societies (Materiale Textkulturen 8) (pp. 73–92). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Schulz, Katja. (2019). Inscriptions in Old Norse literature. In Ricarda Wagner, Christine Neufeld, Ludger Lieb (Eds.), Writing beyond pen and parchment: Inscribed objects in medieval European literature (Materiale Textkulturen 30) (pp. 41–61). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515_9783110645446-003
    • Wiebelt, Alexandra. (2004). Do symmetrical letter pairs affect readability? A cross-linguistic examination of writing systems with specific reference to the runes [Special issue: From letter to sound, edited by Martin Neef & Beatrice Primus]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(2), 275–303. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.2.07wie
  • Düwel, Klaus. (2008). Runenkunde (Fourth edition) (Sammlung Metzler 72). Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler. [1968, First edition; 1983, Second edition; 2001, Third edition] Cited by2
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Salomon, Corinna. (2021). Comparative perspectives on the study of script transfer, and the origin of the runic script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 143–199). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-salo
  • Dyer, F. N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes. Memory & Cognition, 1, 106–120. Cited by4
    • Paradis, Michel, Hagiwara, Hiroko, & Hildebrandt, Nancy. (1985). Neurolinguistic aspects of the Japanese writing system (Perspectives in Neurolinguistics, Neuropsychology, and Psycholinguistics). Tokyo; Orlando, FL; London: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Reich, Shulamit S., & Cherry, Colin. (1979). A direct access from graphics to meaning: A study of the Stroop effect in sentences. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 371–377). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Dyson, Mary C., & Gregory, Judy. (2002). Typographic cueing on screen. Visible Language, 36(3), 326–346.
  • Dyson, Mary C., & Suen, Ching Y. (Eds.). (2016). Digital fonts and reading (Series on Computer Processing of Languages 1). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
  • Dyson, Mary C., Tam, Keith, Leake, Clare, & Kwok, Brian. (2016). How does expertise contribute to the recognition of Latin and Chinese characters?. In Mary C. Dyson & Ching Y. Suen (Eds.), Digital fonts and reading (Series on Computer Processing of Languages 1) (pp. 193–208). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Compiled and edited by Terry Joyce. © April, 2022