• Uchida, Seiichi. (2014). Text localization and recognition in images and video. In David Doermann & Karl Tombre (Eds.), Handbook of document image processing and recognition (pp. 843–883). London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-859-1_28
  • Ueda, Atsuko. (2014). Competing “languages”: “Sound” in the orthographic reforms of early Meiji Japan. In Benjamin A. Elman (Ed.), Rethinking East Asian languages, vernaculars, and literacies, 1000–1919 (Sinica Leidensia 115) (pp. 220–253). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004279278_010
  • Uhry, Joanna K. (1999). Invented spelling in kindergarten: The relationship with finger-point reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 441–464. Cited by2
    • Raynolds, Laura B., & Uhry, Joanna K. (2010). The invented spellings of non-Spanish phonemes by Spanish–English bilingual and English monolingual kindergarteners. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9169-7
    • Ritchey, Kristen D. (2008). The building blocks of writing: Learning to write letters and spell words [Special issue: Research on writing development, practice, instruction, and assessment, edited by Steve Graham]. Reading and Writing, 21(1/2), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9063-0
  • Uhry, J. K., & Shepherd, M. J. (1993). Segmentation/spelling instruction as part of a first grade reading program: Effects on several measures of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 218–233. Cited by8
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (2006). Alphabetics instruction helps students learn to read. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 649–677). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Kroese, Judith M., Hynd, George W., Knight, Deborah F., Hiemenz, Jennifer R., & Hall, Josh. (2000). Clinical appraisal of spelling ability and its relationship to phonemic awareness (blending, segmenting, elision, and reversal), phonological memory, and reading in reading disabled, ADHD, and normal children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 105–131.
    • McGuinness, Diane. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • O'Connor, Rollanda E., & Padeliadu, Susana. (2000). Blending versus whole word approaches in first grade remedial reading: Short-term and delayed effects on reading and spelling words. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 159–182.
    • Ritchey, Kristen D. (2008). The building blocks of writing: Learning to write letters and spell words [Special issue: Research on writing development, practice, instruction, and assessment, edited by Steve Graham]. Reading and Writing, 21(1/2), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9063-0
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Uhry, Joanna K. (1999). Invented spelling in kindergarten: The relationship with finger-point reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 441–464.
  • Uldall, H. J. (1944). Speech and writing. Acta Linguistica, 4, 11–16. Cited by9
    • Bhatt, Prath M. (1988). Graphic systems, phonic systems, and linguistic representations. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 106–120). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Erfurt, Jürgen. (1996). Sprachwandel und Schriftlichkeit [Language change and writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1387–1404). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2011). The relation of orthographic units to linguistic units in the Japanese writing system: An analysis of kanji, kana and kanji-okurigana writing. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Tsukuba, Japan.
    • Kohrt, Manfred. (1986). The term ‘grapheme’ in the history and theory of linguistics. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphemics and orthography (pp. 80–96). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867329.80
    • Presutti, Stefano. (2021a). The interdependence between speech and writing. Towards a greater awareness. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 83–101). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-prea
    • Tauli, Valter. (1977). Speech and spelling. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 17–35). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Vachek, Josef. (1973). Written language: General problems and problems of English (Janua Linguarum, Series Critica 14). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Vachek, Josef. (1989b). Written language revisited (Selected, edited and introduced by Philip A. Luelsdorff). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Ullman, Berthold L. (1932). Ancient writing and its influence. New York: Longmans Green. [1969, Reprint, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1980, Second edition, Toronto: University of Toronto Press] Cited by7
    • Drogin, Marc. (1980). Medieval calligraphy: Its history and technique. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun and Co. [1989, Corrected reprint, New York: Dover Publications]
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Houston, Keith. (2013). Shady characters: The secret life of punctuation, symbols and other typographical marks. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2012). The shape of script: How and why writing systems change (School for Advanced Research Advanced Seminar Series). Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
    • Knight, Stan. (1996). The Roman alphabet. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 312–332). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sass, Benjamin. (1988). The genesis of the alphabet and its development in the second millenium B.C. (Ägyten und Altes Testament 13). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
    • Song, Ki-Joong. (2011). Ancient Indian and Chinese models of sound classification and their reflections in the writing systems. Scripta, 3, 25–43.
  • Ullman, B. L. (1934). How old is the Greek alphabet? American Journal of Archaeology, 38(3), 359–381. Cited by5
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Elti di Rodeano, Sveva. (2021). Scripts in contact: Transmission of the first alphabets. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 223–239). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-rode
    • Elvira Astoreca, Natalia. (2021a). Early Greek alphabetic writing: A linguistic approach (Contexts of and Relations Between Early Writing Systems 5). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Waal, Willemijn. (2018). On the “Phoenician letters”: The case for an early transmission of the Greek alphabet from an archaeological, epigraphic and linguistic perspective. Aegean Studies, 1, 83–125.
  • Ullman, Berthold L. (1960). The origin and development of humanistic script. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura. [1974, Second edition] Cited by7
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2004). Rethinking written culture [A discussion of R. Harris, (2000), Rethinking writing]. Language Sciences, 26, 57–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2003.06.001
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Brekle, Herbert E. (1994b). Die Buchstabenformen westlicher Alphabetschriften in ihrer historischen Entwicklung [The development of letter forms in western alphabets]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 171–204). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110111293.1.2.171
    • Clayton, Ewan. (2013). The golden thread: The story of writing. London: Atlantic Books; Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint.
    • Dane, Joseph A. (2012). Out of sorts: On typography and modern theories of print culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Römer, Jürgen. (1996). Abkürzungen [Abbreviations]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1506–1515). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Ullman, Berthold L. (1969). Ancient writing and its influence (Reprint). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [1932, First edition, New York: Longmans Green; 1980, Second edition, Toronto: University of Toronto Press] Cited by3
    • Firmage, R. A. (1993). The alphabet abecedarium: Some notes on letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine. [2000, Reprinted, London: Bloomsbury]
    • Knight, Stan. (1996). The Roman alphabet. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 312–332). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Song, Ki-Joong. (2011). Ancient Indian and Chinese models of sound classification and their reflections in the writing systems. Scripta, 3, 25–43.
  • Ullman, Berthold L. (1974). The origin and development of humanistic script (Second edition). Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura. [1960, First edition] Cited by3
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Houston, Keith. (2013). Shady characters: The secret life of punctuation, symbols and other typographical marks. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
    • Knight, Stan. (1996). The Roman alphabet. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 312–332). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ullman, Berthold L. (1980). Ancient writing and its influence (Second edition). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. [1932, First edition, New York: Longmans Green; 1969, Reprint, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press] Cited by4
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Underwood, Geoffrey, & Underwood, Jean. (1986). Cognitive processes in reading and spelling. In Asher Cashdan (Ed.), Literacy: Teaching and learning language skills (pp. 32–60). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Cited by1
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Underwood, Jean D. M. (1980). The influence of texture gradients on relief interpretation from isopleth maps. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 279–290). New York; London: Plenum Press.
  • Underwood, N. R., & McConkie, G. W. (1985). Perceptual span for letter distinctions during reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.2307/747752 Cited by8
    • Beier, Sofie, & Oderkerk, Chiron. (2019). The effect of age and font on reading ability, Visible Language, 53(3), 50–69.
    • Heister, Julian, Würzner, Kay-Michael, & Kliegl, Reinhold. (2012). Analysing large datasets of eye movements during reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 102–130). London: Psychology Press.
    • Henderson, John M., & Ferreira, Fernanda. (1993). Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 201–221. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 73–93). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Slattery, Timothy J. (2016). Eye movements: From psycholinguistics to font design. In Mary C. Dyson & Ching Y. Suen (Eds.), Digital fonts and reading Series on Computer Processing of Languages 1) (pp. 54–78). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Unger, J. M. (1984). Japanese orthography in the computer age. Visible Language, 18(3), 238–253. Cited by9
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1998b). [Book reviews: Nanette Gottlieb, (1995), Kanji politics: Language policy and Japanese script & J. Marshall Unger, (1996), Literacy and script reform in Occupation Japan: Reading between the lines]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 282–286.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Kess, Joseph F., & Miyamoto, Tadao. (1999). The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Leong, Che Kan. (1995). Orthographic and psycholinguistic considerations in developing literacy in Chinese. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 163–183). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Robertson, Wesley C. (2020). Scripting Japan: Orthography, variation, and the creation of meaning in written Japanese (Routledge Studies in Sociolinguistics). London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331008
    • Seeley, Christopher. (1991). A history of writing in Japan. (Brill’s Japanese Studies Library 3). Leiden: Brill. [2000, Reprinted, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press]
    • Sirat, Colette. (1994). Handwriting and the writing hand. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 375–460). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Smith, Janet S. (Shibamoto), & Schmidt, David L. (1996). Variability in written Japanese: Toward a sociolinguistics of script choice. Visible Language, 30(1), 46–71.
  • Unger, J. Marshall. (1987). The fifth generation fallacy: Why Japan is betting its future on artificial intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press. Cited by24
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Gottlieb, Nanette. (1995). Kanji politics: Language policy and Japanese script. London; New York: Kegan Paul International. [2016, reprinted, London; New York: Routledge]
    • Gottlieb, Nanette. (2005). Language and society in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Hannas, William C. (2003). The writing on the wall: How Asian orthography curbs creativity (Encounters with Asia). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Hatano, Giyoo. (1995). The psychology of Japanese literacy: Expanding ‘the practice account’. In Laura M. W. Martin, Katherine Nelson, & Ethel Tobach (Eds.), Sociocultural psychology: Theory and practice of doing and knowing (pp. 250–275). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2011). The relation of orthographic units to linguistic units in the Japanese writing system: An analysis of kanji, kana and kanji-okurigana writing. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Tsukuba, Japan.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2019). What do kanji graphs represent in the current Japanese writing system? Towards a unified model of kanji as written signs. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 185–208). Brest: Fluxus Editions. http://www.fluxus-editions.fr/gla1-hond.pdf
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Kess, Joseph F., & Miyamoto, Tadao. (1999). The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. (2000). Sejong's theory of literacy and writing [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin w. Kim, Elmer H., Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 13–45.
    • Lee, Shin-Ping, Uttal, David H., & Chen, Chuansheng. (1995). Writing systems and acquisition of reading in American, Chinese and Japanese first-graders. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 247–263). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Leong, Che Kan. (1995). Orthographic and psycholinguistic considerations in developing literacy in Chinese. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 163–183). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • Mair, Victor H. (1996). Modern Chinese writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 200–208). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Robinson, Andrew. (1995). The story of writing: Alphabets, hieroglyphs & pictograms. London: Thames & Hudson. [2007, Revised edition]
    • Smith, Janet S. (Shibamoto) (1996). Japanese writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 209–217). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1995). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.3 [2014, Revised edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14)]
    • Unger, J. Marshall. (2004). Ideogram: Chinese characters and the myth of disembodied meaning. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Unger, J. Marshall, & DeFrancis, John. (1995). Logographic and semasiographic writing systems: A critique of Sampson's classification. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 45–58). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Yamada, Jun. (1995). Asymmetries between reading and writing for Japanese children. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 215–230). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Yamada, Jun, & Leong, Che Kan. (2005). Differential reading, naming, and transcribing speeds of Japanese romaji and hiragana. Reading and Writing, 18(4), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3356-y
  • Unger, J. Marshall. (1990). The very idea: the notion of ideogram in China and Japan. Monumenta Nipponica, 45(4), 391–411. Cited by15
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1998b). [Book reviews: Nanette Gottlieb, (1995), Kanji politics: Language policy and Japanese script & J. Marshall Unger, (1996), Literacy and script reform in Occupation Japan: Reading between the lines]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 282–286.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Dürscheid, Christa, & Meletis, Dimitrios. (2019). Emojis: A grapholinguistic approach. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 167–183). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-duer
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Galambos, Imre. (2014b). The Chinese script. Chinese Studies, Oxford Bibliographies (added: 28/04/2014). http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/browse?module_0=obo-9780199920082
    • Gottlieb, Nanette. (1995). Kanji politics: Language policy and Japanese script. London; New York: Kegan Paul International. [2016, reprinted, London; New York: Routledge]
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2011). The relation of orthographic units to linguistic units in the Japanese writing system: An analysis of kanji, kana and kanji-okurigana writing. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Tsukuba, Japan.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2019). What do kanji graphs represent in the current Japanese writing system? Towards a unified model of kanji as written signs. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 185–208). Brest: Fluxus Editions. http://www.fluxus-editions.fr/gla1-hond.pdf
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • Mair, Victor H. (1996). Modern Chinese writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 200–208). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Mullaney, Thomas S. (2017). The Chinese typewriter: A history. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • O'Neill, Timothy Michael. (2016). Ideography and Chinese language theory: A history (Welten Ostasiens - Worlds of East Asia - Mondes de l'Extrême Orient 26). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Robinson, Andrew. (1995). The story of writing: Alphabets, hieroglyphs & pictograms. London: Thames & Hudson. [2007, Revised edition]
    • Unger, J. Marshall. (2004). Ideogram: Chinese characters and the myth of disembodied meaning. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
  • Unger, J. Marshall. (1996). Literacy and script reform in occupation Japan: Reading between the lines. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by14
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2004). Rethinking written culture [A discussion of R. Harris, (2000), Rethinking writing]. Language Sciences, 26, 57–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2003.06.001
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1998b). [Book reviews: Nanette Gottlieb, (1995), Kanji politics: Language policy and Japanese script & J. Marshall Unger, (1996), Literacy and script reform in Occupation Japan: Reading between the lines]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 282–286.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Gottlieb, Nanette. (2005). Language and society in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Igarashi, Yuko. (2007). The changing role of katakana in the Japanese writing system: Processing and pedagogical dimensions for native speakers and foreign learners. Doctoral dissertation. University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. [2008, Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.]
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Rubinger, Richard. (2000). Who can't read and write? Illiteracy in Meiji Japan. Monumenta Nipponica, 55(2), 163–198.
    • Tranter, Nicolas. (2008). Nonconventional script choice in Japan [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.040
    • Unger, J. Marshall. (2004). Ideogram: Chinese characters and the myth of disembodied meaning. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Unseth, Peter. (2005). Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns
    • Weisenfeld, Gennifer. (2011). Japanese typographic design and the art of letterforms. In Jerome Silbergeld, Dora C. Y. Ching, Judith G. Smith, & Alfreda Murck (Eds.), Bridges to heaven: Essays on East Asian Art in honor of Professor Wen C. fong. Volume 1 (pp. 827–848). Princeton, NJ: P. Y. & Kinmay W. Tang Center for East Asian Art, Department of Art and Archaeology, Princeton University, in association with Princeton University Press.
    • Yamada, Jun, & Leong, Che Kan. (2005). Differential reading, naming, and transcribing speeds of Japanese romaji and hiragana. Reading and Writing, 18(4), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3356-y
  • Unger, J. Marshall. (2001). Functional digraphia in Japan as revealed in consumer product preferences. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 150, 141–152. Cited by4
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Li, Yu. (2020). The Chinese writing system in Asia: An interdisciplinary perspective. London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345333
    • Tranter, Nicolas. (2008). Nonconventional script choice in Japan [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.040
    • Unger, J. Marshall. (2004). Ideogram: Chinese characters and the myth of disembodied meaning. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
  • Unger, J. Marshall. (2002). How the ideographic myth misleads historians: An example from the occupation of Japan. In Mary S. Erbaugh (Ed.), Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6) (pp. 194–204). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
  • Unger, J. Marshall. (2004). Ideogram: Chinese characters and the myth of disembodied meaning. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press. Cited by12
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Galambos, Imre. (2014b). The Chinese script. Chinese Studies, Oxford Bibliographies (added: 28/04/2014). http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/browse?module_0=obo-9780199920082
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Jacobowitz, Seth. (2015). Writing technology in Meiji Japan: A media history of modern Japanese literature and visual culture (Harvard East Asian Monographs 387). Cambridge MA; London: Harvard University Asia Center.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Li, Yu. (2020). The Chinese writing system in Asia: An interdisciplinary perspective. London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345333
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • McDougall, Siné, Brunswick, Nicola, & de Mornay Davies, Paul. (2010). Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies: An introduction and overview. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 3–21). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Osterkamp, Sven, & Schreiber, Gordian. (2021). Challenging the dichotomy between phonography and morphography: Transitions and gray areas. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 47–82). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-oste
    • Robinson, Andrew. (2009b). Writing and script: A very short introduction (Very Short Introductions). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Unger, J. Marshall. (2011). What linguistic units do Chinese characters represent? Written Language & Literacy, 14(2), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.06ung
    • Yamada, Jun, & Leong, Che Kan. (2005). Differential reading, naming, and transcribing speeds of Japanese romaji and hiragana. Reading and Writing, 18(4), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3356-y
  • Unger, J. Marshall. (2011). What linguistic units do Chinese characters represent? Written Language & Literacy, 14(2), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.06ung Cited by3
    • Neef, Martin. (2015). Writing systems as modular objects: Proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics, 1, 708–721. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2015-0026
    • Osterkamp, Sven, & Schreiber, Gordian. (2021). Challenging the dichotomy between phonography and morphography: Transitions and gray areas. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 47–82). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-oste
    • Sproat, Richard. (2013). A note on Unger's “What linguistic units do Chinese characters represent?” Written Language & Literacy, 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.1.05spr
  • Unger, J. Marshall. (2012). Describing old Japanese kanji usage: The inadequacy of traditional terminology. Scripta, 4, 93–105. Cited by1
    • Kornicki, Peter Francis. (2018). Languages, scripts, and Chinese texts in East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198797821.001
  • Unger, J. Marshall. (2013). Zipf and morphemes: A reply to Sproat. Written Language & Literacy, 16(1), 112–114. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.1.06ung
  • Unger, J. Marshall, & DeFrancis, John. (1995). Logographic and semasiographic writing systems: A critique of Sampson's classification. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 45–58). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Cited by17
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Handel, Zev. (2015). Logography and the classification of writing systems: A response to Unger. Scripta, 7, 109–150.
    • Handel, Zev. (2019). Sinography: The borrowing and adaptation of the Chinese script (Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis 1). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352223
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2019). What do kanji graphs represent in the current Japanese writing system? Towards a unified model of kanji as written signs. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 185–208). Brest: Fluxus Editions. http://www.fluxus-editions.fr/gla1-hond.pdf
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Joyce, Terry, & Borgwaldt, Susanne R. (2011). Typology of writing systems: Special issue introduction [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.01joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • McCarthy, Suzanne. (1995). The Cree syllabary and the writing system riddle: A paradigm in crisis. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 59–75). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Pae, Hye K. (2018a). Written languages, East-Asian scripts, and cross-linguistic influences: An introduction. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Share, David L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(752). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
    • Unger, J. Marshall. (2004). Ideogram: Chinese characters and the myth of disembodied meaning. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Zadka, Małgorzata. (2018). Semasiographic principle in Linear B inscriptions. Writing Systems Research, 10(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2019.1588835
  • Ungnad, Arthur. (1927). Sumerische und chinesische Schrift. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 34, 76–86. Cited by3
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1992b). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 83–110). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996c). The first civilization. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 21–32). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Uno, Akira, Wydell, Taeko N., Haruhara, Noriko, Kaneko, Masato, & Shinya, Naoko. (2009). Relationship between reading/writing skills and cognitive abilities among Japanese primary-school children: Normal readers versus poor readers (dyslexics) [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 755–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9128-8 Cited by4
    • Koda, Keiko. (2017). Learning to read Japanese. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 57–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
    • Wydell, Taeko N. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Japanese. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 176–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.009
  • Unseth, Peter. (2005). Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns Cited by19
    • Angermeyer, Philipp Sebastian. (2012). Bilingualism meets digraphia: Script alternation and hybridity in Russian-American writing and beyond. In Mark Sebba, Shahrzad Mahootian, & Carla Jonsson (Eds.), Language mixing and code-switching in writing: Approaches to mixed-language written discourse (Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism 2) (pp. 255–272). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2009). Evaluating merit–the evolution of writing reconsidered. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp001
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2016). Sociolinguistics and the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 261–274). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Enwall, Joakim. (2008). Script choice among the Miao in China [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.041
    • Genee, Inge. (2020). “It's written niisto but it sounds like knee stew.” Handling multiple orthographies in Blackfoot language web resources. Written Language & Literacy, 23(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00031.gen
    • Hopkins, Jason. (2008). Choosing how to write sign language: A sociolinguistic perspective [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.036
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2018). What is natural in writing? Prolegomena to a Natural Grapholinguistics [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00010.mel
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Robertson, Wesley C. (2020). Scripting Japan: Orthography, variation, and the creation of meaning in written Japanese (Routledge Studies in Sociolinguistics). London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331008
    • Sebba, Mark. (2009). Sociolinguistic approaches to writing systems research. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp002
    • Soulaimani, Dris. (2016). Writing and rewriting Amazigh/Berber identity: Orthographies and language ideologies. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1023176
    • Tranter, Nicolas. (2008). Nonconventional script choice in Japan [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.040
    • Unseth, Peter. (2008). The sociolinguistics of script choice: An introduction [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.030
    • Unseth, Peter. (2016a). The international impact of Sequoyah's Cherokee syllabary. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.03uns
    • Unseth, Peter. (2016b). The syllabary used by the Kickapoo in Mexico. Written Language & Literacy, 19(2), 246–256. doi 10.1075/wll.19.2.05uns
    • Vitrano-Wilson, Seth. (2016). Reading syllable-spaced versus word-spaced text in Hmong Daw: Breaking up isn't so hard to do. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1225562
    • Vitrano-Wilson, Seth. (2018). Tai Dam orthographies: Multigraphia, mismatching tones, and mutual borrowing of tone marking devices among three scripts. Written Language & Literacy, 21(2), 198–237. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00015.vit
  • Unseth, Peter. (2008). The sociolinguistics of script choice: An introduction [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.030 Cited by7
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2009). Evaluating merit–the evolution of writing reconsidered. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp001
    • Jones, Mari C., & Mooney, Damien (Eds.). (2017). Creating orthographies for endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316562949
    • Mumin, Meikal. (2014). The Arabic script in Africa: Understudied literacy. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 41–76). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Sebba, Mark. (2009). Sociolinguistic approaches to writing systems research. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp002
    • Soulaimani, Dris. (2016). Writing and rewriting Amazigh/Berber identity: Orthographies and language ideologies. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1023176
    • Unseth, Peter. (2016a). The international impact of Sequoyah's Cherokee syllabary. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.03uns
  • Unseth, Peter. (2016a). The international impact of Sequoyah's Cherokee syllabary. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.03uns Cited by2
    • Buckley, Eugene. (2018). Core syllables vs. moraic writing [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00009.buc
    • Salomon, Corinna. (2021). Comparative perspectives on the study of script transfer, and the origin of the runic script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 143–199). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-salo
  • Unseth, Peter. (2016b). The syllabary used by the Kickapoo in Mexico. Written Language & Literacy, 19(2), 246–256. doi 10.1075/wll.19.2.05uns
  • Unsworth, S. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). The impact of reader skill on phonological processing in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 63–81. Cited by7
    • Binder, Katherine, & Borecki, Caren. (2008). The use of phonological, orthographic, and contextual information during reading: A comparison of adults who are learning to read and skilled adult readers. Reading and Writing, 21(8), 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9099-1
    • Friesen, Deanna C., & Joanisse, Marc F. (2012). Homophone effects in deaf readers: Evidence from lexical decision. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9275-6
    • Nelson, Jessica R., Balass, Michal, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2005). Differences between written and spoken input in learning new words [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 101–120.
    • Rahbari, Noriyeh, & Sénéchal, Monique. (2009). Lexical and nonlexical processes in the skilled reading and spelling of Persian. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9122-1
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Taft, Marcus. (2006). A localist-cum-distributed (LCD) framework for lexical processing. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 76–94). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
  • Upasak, Chandrika Singh. (1960). The history and palaeography of Mauryan Brahmi script. Nalanda, India. Cited by7
    • Bright, William. (1994). Evolution of the Indian writing system. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 322–328). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Pandey, Krishna Kumar, & Jha, Smita. (2019). Tracing the identity and ascertaining the nature of Brahmi-derived Devanagari script. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 9(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.9.1.59-73
    • Patel, Purushottam G. (1995). Brahmi scripts, Orthographic units and reading acquisition. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 265–275). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Salomon, Richard G. (1996). Brahmi and Kharoshthi. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 373–383). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sander, Lore. (2003). Brāhmī scripts in North India from the beginning in the 3rd cent. B.C. to the 7th cent. A.D. under the aspect of digitisation. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 92–102). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Srivastava, Anupama. (1998). The development of imperial Gupta Brāhmī script (The Heritage of Ancient India 35). New Delhi: Ramanand Vidya Bhawan.
  • Updike, Daniel Berkeley. (1922). Printing types: Their history, forms, and use; A study in survivals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [1937, Second edition; 1962, Third edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: Oxford University Press; 2001, Reprint, New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press] Cited by6
    • Diringer, David. (1948). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind. London: Hutchinson; New York: Philosophical Library. [1953, Second revised edition; 1968, Third revised edition (2 volumes), London: Hutchinson; New York: Funk & Wagnalls; 1996, Reprinted, Munshiram Maniharlal Publishers]
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Hill, Will. (2016). Typography and the printed English text. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 431–451). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Houston, Keith. (2013). Shady characters: The secret life of punctuation, symbols and other typographical marks. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [1987, Reprinted with corrections; 2015, Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing]
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
  • Updike, Daniel Berkeley. (1922). Printing types: Their history, forms, and use; A study in survivals (Second edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [1922, First edition; 1962, Third edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: Oxford University Press; 2001, Reprint, New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press] Cited by11
    • Boeckeler, Erika Mary. (2017). Playful letters: A study in early modern alphabetics. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
    • Clayton, Ewan. (2013). The golden thread: The story of writing. London: Atlantic Books; Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Dane, Joseph A. (2012). Out of sorts: On typography and modern theories of print culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Dowding, Geoffrey. (1961). An introduction to the history of printing types: An illustrated summary of the main stages in the development of type design from 1440 up to the present day: An aid to type face identification. London: Wace & Company. [1998, reprinted, London: The British Library; New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press]
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    • Eliason, Craig. (2015). “Transitional” typefaces: The history of a typefounding classification. Design Issues, 31(4), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00349
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Haralambous, Yannis. (2007). Fonts & encodings: From Unicode to advanced typography and everything in between (translated by P. Scott Horne). Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
    • Knight, Stan. (1996). The Roman alphabet. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 312–332). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Levarie, Norma. (1968). The art and history of books. New York: James H. Heinemn. [1995, Reprinted, New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press; London: The British Library]
  • Updike, Daniel Berkeley. (1962). Printing types: Their history, forms, and use; A study in survivals (Third edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: Oxford University Press. [1922, First edition; 1937, Second edition; 2001, Reprint, New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press] Cited by6
    • Firmage, R. A. (1993). The alphabet abecedarium: Some notes on letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine. [2000, Reprinted, London: Bloomsbury]
    • Fleming, Juliet. (2016). Cultural graphology: Writing after Derrida. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    • Knight, Stan. (1996). The Roman alphabet. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 312–332). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rummonds, Richard-Gabriel. (1998). Printing on the iron handpress. New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press; London: The British Library.
    • Sutton, James, & Bartram, Alan. (1990). Typefaces for books. London: The British Library.
    • Twyman, Michael. (1998). The British Library guide to printing: History and techniques. London: The British Library.
  • Updike, Daniel Berkeley. (2001). Printing types: Their history, forms, and use; A study in survivals (Reprint). New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press. [1922, First edition; 1937, Second edition; Third edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: Oxford University Press] Cited by1
    • Haley, Allan, Poulin, Richard, Tselentis, Jason, Seddon, Tony, Leonidas, Gerry, Saltz, & Ina, Henderson, Kathryn, with Alterman, Tyler. (2012). Typography, referenced: A comprehensive visual guide to the language, history, and practice of typography. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
  • Uppstad, Per Henning, Solheim, Oddny Judith, & Skaftun , Atle. (2020). The reading – writing connection in assessment of reading comprehension. Exploring the role of a communicative aspect of writing. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 243–262). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_16
  • Upward, Christopher, & Davidson, George. (2011). The history of English spelling (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Cited by8
    • Bann, Jennifer, & Corbett, John. (2015). Spelling Scots: The orthography of literary Scots, 1700-2000. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2016). Sociolinguistics and the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 261–274). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Cummings, D. W. (2016). The evolution of British and American spelling. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 275–292). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Horobin, Simon. (2016). The etymological inputs into English spelling. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 113–124). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Rutkowska, Hanna. (2017). Orthography. In Laurel J. Brinton, & Alexander Bergs (Eds), The history of English. Volume 1: Historical outlines from sound to text (pp. 200–217). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Scholfield, Phil. (2016). Modernization and standardization since the seventeenth century. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 143–161). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Yule, Valerie, & Ishi, Yasuko. (2016). Spelling reform. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 413–427). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Urton, G. (2003). Signs of the Inka Khipu: Binary coding in the Andean knotted-string records. Austin: University of Texas Press. Cited by9
    • Bodel, John, & Houston, Stephen (Eds.). (2021). The hidden language of graphic signs: Cryptic writing and meaningful marks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886505
    • Englehardt, Joshua (Ed.). (2012). Agency in ancient writing. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Hyland, Sabine. (2010). Sodomy, sin, and string writing: The moral origins of Andean khipu [Special issue: Graphic pluralism: Native American systems of inscription and the colonial situation, edited by Frank Salomon & Sabine Hyland]. Ethnohistory, 57(1), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-2009-058
    • Mikulska, Katarzyna. (2019a). Introduction: Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach [translation by Jerome A. Offner]. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 3–22). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c000b
    • Salomon, Frank. (2008). Late khipu use. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 285–310). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Salomon, Frank. (2013). The twisting paths of recall: Khipu (Andean cord notation) as artifact. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 15–43). London: Ubiquity Press. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.b
    • Urton, Gary. (2010). Numeral graphic pluralism in the colonial Andes [Special issue: Graphic pluralism: Native American systems of inscription and the colonial situation, edited by Frank Salomon & Sabine Hyland]. Ethnohistory, 57(1), 135–164. https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-2009-057
    • van den Hout, Theo. (2020). A history of Hittite literacy: Writing and reading in Late Bronze-Age Anatolia (1650–1200 BC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860161
  • Urton, Gary. (2010). Numeral graphic pluralism in the colonial Andes [Special issue: Graphic pluralism: Native American systems of inscription and the colonial situation, edited by Frank Salomon & Sabine Hyland]. Ethnohistory, 57(1), 135–164. https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-2009-057
Compiled and edited by Terry Joyce. © April, 2022