• Ó Murchú, Máirtín. (1977). Successes and failures in the modernization of Irish spelling. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 267–289). The Hague; Paris: Mouton. Cited by1
    • Hickey, Tina. (2005). Second language writing systems: Minority languages and reluctant readers. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 398–423). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
  • Oaken, R., Wiener, M., & Cromer, W. (1971). Identification, organization, and reading comprehension for good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 71–78. Cited by3
    • Gibson, Eleanor J., & Levin, Harry. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Martin-Chang, Sandra Lyn, & Levy, Betty Ann. (2005). Fluency transfer: Differential gains in reading speed and accuracy following isolated word and context training. Reading and Writing, 18(4), 343–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-0668-x
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Oakey, David, & Russell, David R. (2014). Beyond single domains: Writing in boundary crossing. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 385–411). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Oakhill, J. V. (1982). Constructive processes in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders' memory for sentences. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 13–20. Cited by8
    • Cain, Kate, & Oakhill, Jane V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
    • Cain, Kate, Oakhill, Jane, & Bryant, Peter. (2000a). Investigating the causes of reading comprehension failure: The comprehension-age match design. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008058319399
    • Cain, Kate, Oakhill, Jane, & Bryant, Peter. (2000b). Phonological skills and comprehension failure: A test of the phonological processing deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008051414854
    • Megherbi, Hakima, & Ehrlich, Marie-France. (2005). Language impairment in less skilled comprehenders: The on-line processing of anaphoric pronouns in a listening situation. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 715–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-8131-6
    • Oakhill, Jane V., Berenhaus, Molly S., & Cain, Kate. (2015). Children's reading comprehension and comprehension difficulties. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 344–360). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Oakhill, Jane, & Cain, Kate. (2017). Children with specific text comprehension problems. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 359–375). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Oakhill, Jane, Hartt, Joanne, & Samols, Deborah. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3355-z
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Oakhill, J. V. (1983). Instantiation in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 441–450. Cited by3
    • Cain, Kate, & Oakhill, Jane V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
    • Oakhill, Jane, Hartt, Joanne, & Samols, Deborah. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3355-z
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Oakhill, J. V. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children's comprehension of stories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1984.tb00842.x Cited by9
    • Cain, Kate, & Oakhill, Jane V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
    • Cain, Kate, Oakhill, Jane, & Bryant, Peter. (2000a). Investigating the causes of reading comprehension failure: The comprehension-age match design. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008058319399
    • Megherbi, Hakima, & Ehrlich, Marie-France. (2005). Language impairment in less skilled comprehenders: The on-line processing of anaphoric pronouns in a listening situation. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 715–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-8131-6
    • Oakhill, Jane V., Berenhaus, Molly S., & Cain, Kate. (2015). Children's reading comprehension and comprehension difficulties. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 344–360). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Oakhill, Jane, & Cain, Kate. (2017). Children with specific text comprehension problems. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 359–375). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Oakhill, Jane, Hartt, Joanne, & Samols, Deborah. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3355-z
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • van den Broek, Paul, & Kendeou, Panayiota. (2017). Development of reading comprehension: Change and continuity in the ability to construct coherent representations. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 283–305). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Oakhill, J. V. (1993). Children's difficulties in reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 223–237. Cited by4
    • Dufva, Mia, Niemi, Pekka, & Voeten, Marinus J. M. (2001). The role of phonological memory, word recognition, and comprehension skills in reading development: From preschool to grade 2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1/2), 91–117.
    • Hacker, Douglas J. (1997). Comprehension monitoring of written discourse across early-to-middle adolescence. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(3), 207–240.
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Oakhill, J. V. (1994). Individual differences in children's text comprehension. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 821–848). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Cited by10
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, Share, David, & Mansour, Maysaloon Said. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(5), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024237415143
    • Cain, Kate, Oakhill, Jane, & Bryant, Peter. (2000a). Investigating the causes of reading comprehension failure: The comprehension-age match design. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008058319399
    • Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan. (2006). How language characteristics influence Turkish literacy development. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 219–229). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Ehrlich, Marie-France, Remond, Martine, & Tardieu, Hubert (1999). Processing of anaphoric devices in young skilled and less skilled comprehenders: Differences in metacognitive monitoring. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(1), 29–63.
    • Goff, Deborah A., Pratt, Chris, & Ong, Ben. (2005). The relations between children's reading comprehension, working memory, language skills and components of reading decoding in a normal sample. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 583–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-7109-0
    • Hart, Lesley, & Perfetti, Charles. (2008). Learning words in Zekkish: Implications for understanding lexical representation. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 107–128). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Kaplan, Dafna. (2013). Development of reading comprehension from middle childhood to adolescence: Distributional and qualitative analyses of two genres. Written Language & Literacy, 16(2), 208–240. https://doi.org/10.1075/wlL16.2.04kap
    • Megherbi, Hakima, & Ehrlich, Marie-France. (2005). Language impairment in less skilled comprehenders: The on-line processing of anaphoric pronouns in a listening situation. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 715–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-8131-6
    • Seigneuric, Alix, & Ehrlich, Marie-France. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children's reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 617–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Oakhill, Jane V., Berenhaus, Molly S., & Cain, Kate. (2015). Children's reading comprehension and comprehension difficulties. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 344–360). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219 Cited by7
    • Cain, Kate, & Barnes, Marcia A. (2017). Reading comprehension: What develops and when? In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 257–281). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • McMaster, Kristen L., & Espin, Christine A. (2017). Reading comprehension instruction and intervention: Promoting inference making. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 463–487). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Oakhill, Jane V., Berenhaus, Molly S., & Cain, Kate. (2015). Children's reading comprehension and comprehension difficulties. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 344–360). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Oakhill, Jane, & Cain, Kate. (2017). Children with specific text comprehension problems. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 359–375). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Russell, Devin, & Connor, Carol McDonald. (2016). Memory and learning to read. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 53–66). London; New York: Routledge.
    • van den Broek, Paul, & Kendeou, Panayiota. (2017). Development of reading comprehension: Change and continuity in the ability to construct coherent representations. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 283–305). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Vaughn, Sharon, & Hall, Colby. (2017). Theoretically guided interventions for adolescents who are poor readers. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 489–506). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Oakhill, Jane, & Cain, Kate. (2017). Children with specific text comprehension problems. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 359–375). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K. E., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008 Cited by16
    • Betjemann, Rebecca S., Willcutt, Erik G., Olson, Richard K., Keenan, Janice M., DeFries, John C., & Wadsworth, Sally J. (2008). Word reading and reading comprehension: stability, overlap and independence. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9076-8
    • Botting, N., Simkin, Z., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2006). Associated reading skills in children with a history of Specific Language Impairment (SLI) [Special issue: Reading comprehension - Part II]. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4322-4
    • Keenan, Janice M., & Betjemann, Rebecca S. (2008a). Comprehension of single words: The role of semantics in word identification and reading disability. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 191–210). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Kim, Young-Suk Grace. (2020). Interactive dynamic literacy model: An integrative theoretical framework for reading-writing relations. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 11–34). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_2
    • Landi, Nicole. (2010). An examination of the relationship between reading comprehension, higher-level and lower-level reading sub-skills in adults. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9180-z
    • Leong, Che Kan, & Ho, Man Koon. (2008). The role of lexical knowledge and related linguistic components in typical and poor language comprehenders of Chinese. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9113-7
    • Oakhill, Jane, & Cain, Kate. (2017). Children with specific text comprehension problems. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 359–375). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Oakhill, Jane, Hartt, Joanne, & Samols, Deborah. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3355-z
    • Ouellette, Gene, & Beers, Ashley. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Sánchez, Emilio, & García, J. Ricardo. (2009). The relation of knowledge of textual integration devices to expository text comprehension under different assessment conditions. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1081–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9145-7
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stafura, Joseph Z., & Perfetti, Charles A. (2017). Integrating word processing with text comprehension: Theoretical frameworks and empirical examples. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 9–31). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Vaughn, Sharon, & Hall, Colby. (2017). Theoretically guided interventions for adolescents who are poor readers. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 489–506). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Veneziano, Edy. (2016). The development of narrative discourse in French by 5 to 10 years old children: Some insights from a conversational interaction method. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 141–159). Cham: Springer.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Reitsma, Pieter, & Siegel, Linda S. (2011). Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9232-4
  • Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Yuill, N. (1998). Individual differences in children's comprehension skill: Toward an integrative model. In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 343–367). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by4
    • Goff, Deborah A., Pratt, Chris, & Ong, Ben. (2005). The relations between children's reading comprehension, working memory, language skills and components of reading decoding in a normal sample. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 583–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-7109-0
    • Hart, Lesley, & Perfetti, Charles. (2008). Learning words in Zekkish: Implications for understanding lexical representation. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 107–128). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Megherbi, Hakima, & Ehrlich, Marie-France. (2005). Language impairment in less skilled comprehenders: The on-line processing of anaphoric pronouns in a listening situation. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 715–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-8131-6
    • Seigneuric, Alix, & Ehrlich, Marie-France. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children's reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 617–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0
  • Oakhill, J., & Garnham. A. (1988). Becoming a skilled reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Cited by7
    • Cain, Kate, Oakhill, Jane, & Bryant, Peter. (2000b). Phonological skills and comprehension failure: A test of the phonological processing deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008051414854
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Faust, Miriam, & Kandelshine-Waldman, Osnat. (2011). The effects of different approaches to reading instruction on letter detection tasks in normally achieving and low achieving readers. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 545–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9219-1
    • Smith, Philip T. (1996). Research methods in the psychology of reading. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 932–942). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Yang, Chin Lung, Perfetti, Charles A., & Schmalhofer, Franz. (2005). Less skilled comprehenders' ERPs show sluggish word-to-text integration processes [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 233–257.
  • Oakhill, Jane, Hartt, Joanne, & Samols, Deborah. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3355-z Cited by3
    • Connor, Carol McDonald. (2016a). Using cognitive development research to inform literacy instruction and improve practice in the classroom. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 166–185). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Oakhill, Jane V., Berenhaus, Molly S., & Cain, Kate. (2015). Children's reading comprehension and comprehension difficulties. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 344–360). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Russell, Devin, & Connor, Carol McDonald. (2016). Memory and learning to read. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 53–66). London; New York: Routledge.
  • Oakhill, J., & Kyle, F. (2000). The relation between phonological awareness and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 152–164. Cited by4
    • Barbosa, Thais, Miranda, Monica Carolina, Santos, Ruth F., & Bueno, Orlando Francisco A. (2009). Phonological working memory, phonological awareness and language in literacy difficulties in Brazilian children. Reading and Writing, 22(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9109-3
    • Fricke, Silke, Szczerbinski, Marcin, Stackhouse, Joy, & Fox-Boyer, Annette V. (2008). Predicting individual differences in early literacy acquisition in German: The role of speech and language processing skills and letter knowledge [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 103–146. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.02fri
    • McDougall, Siné J. P., & Donohoe, Rachael. (2002). Reading ability and memory span: Long-term memory contributions to span for good and poor readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 359–387.
    • Zaretsky, Elena, Kraljevic, Jelena Kuvac, Core, Cynthia, & Lencek, Mirjana. (2009). Literacy predictors and early reading and spelling skills as a factor of orthography: Cross-linguistic evidence. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 52–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.03zar
  • Oakhill, J., & Patel, S. (1991). Can imagery training help children who have comprehension problems? Journal of Research in Reading, 14, 106–115. Cited by3
    • Dufva, Mia, Niemi, Pekka, & Voeten, Marinus J. M. (2001). The role of phonological memory, word recognition, and comprehension skills in reading development: From preschool to grade 2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1/2), 91–117.
    • Johnson-Glenberg, Mina C. (2005). Web-based training of metacognitive strategies for text comprehension: Focus on poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 755–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-0956-5
    • Oakhill, Jane, Hartt, Joanne, & Samols, Deborah. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3355-z
  • Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1986). Pronoun resolution in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders: Effects of memory load and inferential complexity. Language and Speech, 29, 25–36. Cited by5
    • Ehrlich, Marie-France, Remond, Martine, & Tardieu, Hubert (1999). Processing of anaphoric devices in young skilled and less skilled comprehenders: Differences in metacognitive monitoring. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(1), 29–63.
    • Megherbi, Hakima, & Ehrlich, Marie-France. (2005). Language impairment in less skilled comprehenders: The on-line processing of anaphoric pronouns in a listening situation. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 715–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-8131-6
    • Oakhill, Jane V., Berenhaus, Molly S., & Cain, Kate. (2015). Children's reading comprehension and comprehension difficulties. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 344–360). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Sánchez, Emilio, & García, J. Ricardo. (2009). The relation of knowledge of textual integration devices to expository text comprehension under different assessment conditions. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1081–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9145-7
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1996). Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and remediation. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 70–91). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by7
    • Connor, Carol McDonald. (2016a). Using cognitive development research to inform literacy instruction and improve practice in the classroom. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 166–185). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Connor, Carol McDonald, & Al Otaiba, Stephanie. (2015). Primary grade reading instruction in the United States. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 415–430). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Engen, Liv, & Høien, Torleiv. (2002). Phonological skills and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 613–631.
    • Lau, Kit-ling, & Chan, David W. (2007). The effects of cognitive strategy instruction on Chinese reading comprehension among Hong Kong low achieving students. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 833–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9047-5
    • Megherbi, Hakima, & Ehrlich, Marie-France. (2005). Language impairment in less skilled comprehenders: The on-line processing of anaphoric pronouns in a listening situation. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 715–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-8131-6
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Oakhill, J., Yuill, N., & Parkin, A. (1986). On the nature of the difference between skilled and less-skilled comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 9, 80–91. Cited by7
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, Desrochers, Alain, & Levesque, Kyle. (2017). Learning to read French. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goff, Deborah A., Pratt, Chris, & Ong, Ben. (2005). The relations between children's reading comprehension, working memory, language skills and components of reading decoding in a normal sample. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 583–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-7109-0
    • Oakhill, Jane V., Berenhaus, Molly S., & Cain, Kate. (2015). Children's reading comprehension and comprehension difficulties. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 344–360). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Oakhill, Jane, Hartt, Joanne, & Samols, Deborah. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7/9), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3355-z
    • Russell, Devin, & Connor, Carol McDonald. (2016). Memory and learning to read. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 53–66). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sparks, Richard L. (2004). Orthographic awareness, phonemic awareness, syntactic processing, and working memory skill in hyperlexic children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(4), 359–386.
  • Ober, J. Hamilton. (1965). Writing: Man's greatest invention. Baltimore: Peabody Institution. Cited by3
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag]
    • Firmage, R. A. (1993). The alphabet abecedarium: Some notes on letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine. [2000, Reprinted, London: Bloomsbury]
  • Oberlies, Thomas. (2001). [Book review: Richard Salomon, (1999), Ancient Buddhist scrolls from Gandhāra: The British Library Kharoṣṭhī fragments]. Written Language & Literacy, 4(2), 230–234.
  • O'Brien, Edward J., & Cook, Anne E. (2015). Models of discourse comprehension. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 217–231). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • O'Brien, E. J., Shank, D. M., Myers, J. L., & Rayner, K. (1988). Elaborative inferences during reading: Do they occur on-line? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 410–420. Cited by6
    • Inhoff, Albrecht W., & Rayner, Keith. (1996). Das Blickverhalten beim Lesen [Eye movements during reading]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 942–957). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • O'Brien, Edward J., & Cook, Anne E. (2015). Models of discourse comprehension. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 217–231). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • O'Connor, M. (1983). Writing systems, native speaker analyses, and the earliest stages of North-West Semitic orthography. In C. L. Meyers & M. O'Connor (Eds.), The word of the Lord shall go on: Essays in honor of David Noel Freedman in celebration of his sixtieth birthday (pp. 439–465). Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns. Cited by7
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2001). Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 43–80). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. [2017, Second edition, (pp. 75–94)]
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Faber, Alice. (1992). Phonemic segmentation as epiphenomenon: Evidence from the history of alphabetic writing. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 111–134). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Hockett, Charles F. (2003). Two lectures on writing [prepared for publication by Peter T. Daniels]. Written Language & Literacy, 6(2), 131–175.
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2007). Kana digraphs and morae: A structural analysis. Written Language & Literacy, 10(1), 65–82.
    • O'Connor, M. (1996c). The alphabet as a technology. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 787–794). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • O'Connor, M. (1996a). Epigraphic Semitic scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 88–107). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by18
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Crellin, Robert. (2019). Writing vowels in Punic: From morphography to phonography [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00026.cre
    • Fear, Douglas. (2015). utā pavastāyā utā carmā grftam āha—Written on clay and parchment: Old Persian writing and allography in Iranian. In Susanne Enderwitz & Rebecca Sauer (Eds.), Communication and materiality: Written and unwritten communication in pre-modern societies (Materiale Textkulturen 8) (pp. 73–92). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Harbour, Daniel. (2021). Grammar drives writing system evolution. Lessons from the birth of vowels. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 201–221). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-harb
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen, Baines, John, & Cooper, Jerrold. (2003). Last writing: Script obsolescence in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Mesoamerica. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45(3), 430–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417503000227
    • Jones, Mari C., & Mooney, Damien (Eds.). (2017). Creating orthographies for endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316562949
    • Lehmann, Reinhard G. (2012). 27–30–22–26 – How many letters needs an alphabet? The case of Semitic. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 11–52). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Rollston, Christopher A. (2014b). The Iron Age Phoenician script. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 72–99). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Salomon, Corinna. (2021). Comparative perspectives on the study of script transfer, and the origin of the runic script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 143–199). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-salo
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard, & Gutkin, Alexander. (2021). The taxonomy of writing systems: How to measure how logographic a system is. Computational Linguistics, 47(3), 477–528. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00409
    • The Unicode Consortium. (1991). The Unicode Standard: Version 1.0. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [1996, Version 2.0; 2003, Version, 4.0.0; 2005, Version 5.0; 2011, Version 6.0.0; 2016, Version 9.0.0; 2018, Version 11.0.0]
  • O'Connor, M. (1996b). The Berber scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 112–116). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by4
    • Baroni, Antonio. (2011). Alphabetic vs. non-alphabetic writing: Linguistic fit and natural tendencies. Rivista di Linguistica [Italian Journal of Linguistics], 23(2), 127–159.
    • Harbour, Daniel. (2021). Grammar drives writing system evolution. Lessons from the birth of vowels. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 201–221). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-harb
    • Savage, Andrew. (2008). Writing Tuareg - the three script options [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.031
    • Soulaimani, Dris. (2016). Writing and rewriting Amazigh/Berber identity: Orthographies and language ideologies. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1023176
  • O'Connor, M. (1996c). The alphabet as a technology. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 787–794). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by3
    • Lehmann, Reinhard G. (2012). 27–30–22–26 – How many letters needs an alphabet? The case of Semitic. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 11–52). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Schmitz, Philip C. (2014). Phoenician seal script. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 141–174). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
  • O'Connor, M. (2001). [Book review: Leonard Shlain, (1998), The alphabet versus the goddess: The conflict between word and image]. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 87–94.
  • O'Connor, Mary Catherine. (2006). The implicit discourse genres of standardized testing: what verbal analogy items require of test takers. In Jenny Cook-Gumperz (Ed.), The social construction of literacy (Second edition) (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 25) (pp. 264–287). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • O'Connor, R. E., & Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9, 78-92. Cited by6
    • Davis, Colin J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
    • Davis, Colin J. (2012). The orthographic similarity of printed words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 185–206). London: Psychology Press.
    • Forster, Kenneth. (1992). Memory-addressing mechanisms and lexical access. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 413–434). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Perea, Manuel. (2015). Neighborhoods effects in visual word recognition and reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 76–87). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
  • O'Connor, R. E., & Jenkins, J. R. (1999). Prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 159–197. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0302_4 Cited by7
    • Catts, Hugh W. (2017). Early identification of reading disabilities. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 311–331). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Fuchs, Douglas, Compton, Donald L., Fuchs, Lynn S., Bryant, Joan, & Davis, G. Nicole. (2008). Making “secondary intervention” work in a three-tier responsiveness-to-intervention model: findings from the first-grade longitudinal reading study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities [Special issue: Recent developments in reading intervention research, edited by William E. Tunmer]. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9083-9
    • Norton, Elizabeth S., Gabrieli, John D. E., & Gaab, Nadine. (2019). Neural predictors of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 253–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.012
    • Piasta, Shayne B., Purpura, David J., & Wagner, Richard K. (2010). Fostering alphabet knowledge development: A comparison of two instructional approaches. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 607–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9174-x
    • Ritchey, Kristen D. (2008). The building blocks of writing: Learning to write letters and spell words [Special issue: Research on writing development, practice, instruction, and assessment, edited by Steve Graham]. Reading and Writing, 21(1/2), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9063-0
    • Sprugevica, Ieva, Paunina, Ingrida, & Høien, Torleiv. (2006). Early phonological skill as a predictor of reading acquisition in Latvian. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 291–301). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Vellutino, Frank R., Scanlon, Donna M., Zhang, Haiyan, & Schatschneider, Christopher. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties [Special issue: Recent developments in reading intervention research, edited by William E. Tunmer]. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 437–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9098-2
  • O'Connor, R. E., Notari-Suverson, A., & Vadasy, P. F. (1996). Ladders to literacy: The effects of teacher-led phonological activities for kindergarten children with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63(1), 117–130. Cited by4
    • Blachman, Benita A., Tangel, Darlene M., Ball, Eileen Wynne, Black, Rochella, & McGraw, Colleen K. (1999). Developing phonological awareness and word recognition skills: A two-year intervention with low-income, inner-city children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 239–273. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008050403932
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (2006). Alphabetics instruction helps students learn to read. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 649–677). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • O'Connor, Rollanda E., & Padeliadu, Susana. (2000). Blending versus whole word approaches in first grade remedial reading: Short-term and delayed effects on reading and spelling words. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 159–182.
    • Vasanta, Duggirala. (2004). Processing phonological information in a semi-syllabic script: Developmental data from Telugu [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000013830.55257.3a
  • O'Connor, Rollanda E., & Padeliadu, Susana. (2000). Blending versus whole word approaches in first grade remedial reading: Short-term and delayed effects on reading and spelling words. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 159–182.
  • Odenstedt, Bengt. (1990). On the origin and early history of the runic script: Typology and graphic variation in the older futhark. Uppsala: Acta Academiae Regiae Gustavi Adolphi. Cited by5
    • Antonsen, Elmer H. (2002). Runes and Germanic linguistics (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and monographs 140). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Salomon, Corinna. (2021). Comparative perspectives on the study of script transfer, and the origin of the runic script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 143–199). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-salo
  • O'Donnell, R. C. (1974). Syntactic differences between speech and writing. American Speech, 49, 102–110. Cited by4
    • Berry, Eleanor. (1992). Modern American poetry and modern American speech. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological studies in language, 21) (pp. 47–67). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Biber, Douglas. (2009). Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 75–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Oesterreicher, W. (1993). Verschriftung und Verschriftlichung im Kontext medialer und konzeptioneller Schriftlichkeit. In Ursula Schäfer (Ed.), Schriftlichkeit im frühen Mittelalter (ScriptOralia 53) (pp. 267–292). Tübingen: Narr. Cited by5
    • Bäuml, Franz H. (1998). [Book review: Joyce Coleman, (1996), Public reading and the reading public in late medieval England and France]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 264–269.
    • Koch, Peter, & Oesterreicher, Wulf. (1994). Schriftlichkeit und Sprache [Writing and language]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 587–604). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Kropp, Amina. (2018). Schriftlichkeit in der Schadenzauberpraxis am Beispiel der vulgärlateinischen defixionum tabellae. In Anne Kolb (Ed.), Literacy in ancient everyday life (pp. 261–286). Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Morales, Antonio J. (2016). From voice to papyrus to wall: Verschriftung and Verschriftlichung in the Old Kingdom Pyramid texts. In Markus Hilgert (Ed.), Understanding material text cultures: A multidisciplinary view (Materiale Textkulturen 9) (pp. 69–130). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515_9783110417845-004
    • Schiegg, Markus. (2013). Medieval glossators as agents of language change. In Esther-Miriam Wagner, Ben Outhwaite, & Bettina Beinhoff (Eds.), Scribes as agents of language change (Studies in Language Change 10) (pp. 39–69). Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Offner, Jerome A. (2019b). What lies beneath: Generating Mesoamerican media surfaces. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 180–203). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c006
  • Offner, Jerome A. (2019b). Afterword. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 376–380). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c014
  • Ogbu, John U. (1990). Minority status and literacy in comparative perspective. Deadalus, 119(2), 141–168. Cited by3
    • Aram, Dorit, Korat, Ofra, & Levin, Iris. (2006). Maternal mediation in a young child's writing activity: A sociocultural perspective. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 709–733). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Giere, Ursula. (1994). Entwicklung von Literalität und Alphabetisierung in England und Nordamerika [The development and advancement of literacy in England and North America]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 873–883). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Schiff, Rachel, & Korat, Ofra. (2006). Sociocultural factors in children's written narrative production. Written Language & Literacy, 9(2), 213–246.
  • Ogg, Oscar. (1948). The 26 letters. New York: Crowell. [1961, Second edition] Cited by5
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Drogin, Marc. (1980). Medieval calligraphy: Its history and technique. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun and Co. [1989, Corrected reprint, New York: Dover Publications]
    • Firmage, R. A. (1993). The alphabet abecedarium: Some notes on letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine. [2000, Reprinted, London: Bloomsbury]
  • Ogg, Oscar. (1961). The 26 letters (Second edition). New York: Crowell. [1948, First edition] Cited by4
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1984). A history of writing. London: British Library. [1987, Second edition; 1992, Third revised edition, London: British Library; New York: Abbeville Press]
  • Ogilvie, Brian. (2016). Correspondence networks. In Bernard Lightman (Ed.), A companion to the history of science (Blackwell Companions to History) (pp. 358–371). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • O'Gorman, L. (1993). The document spectrum for page layout analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15(11), 1162–1173. Cited by5
    • Bukhari, Syed Saqib, Shafait, Faisal, & Breuel, Thomas M. (2012). Layout analysis of Arabic script documents. In Volker Märgner & Haikal El Abed (Eds.), Guide to OCR for Arabic scripts (pp. 35–53). Berlin: Springer.
    • Cao, Huaigu, & Natarajan, Prem. (2014). Machine-printed character recognition. In David Doermann & Karl Tombre (Eds.), Handbook of document image processing and recognition (pp. 331–358). London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-859-1_44
    • Gatos, Basilis G. (2014). Imaging techniques in document analysis processes. In David Doermann & Karl Tombre (Eds.), Handbook of document image processing and recognition (pp. 73–131). London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-859-1_4
    • Kise, Koichi. (2014). Page segmentation techniques in document analysis. In David Doermann & Karl Tombre (Eds.), Handbook of document image processing and recognition (pp. 135–175). London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-859-1_5
    • Shi, Zhixin, Setlur, Srirangaraj, & Govindaraju, Venu. (2012). Pre-processing issues in Arabic OCR. In Volker Märgner & Haikal El Abed (Eds.), Guide to OCR for Arabic scripts (pp. 79–102). Berlin: Springer.
  • Ohala, John J. (1992). The costs and benefits of phonological analysis. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 211–237). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Cited by1
    • Cook, Vivian, & Bassetti, Benedetta. (2005). An introduction to researching second language writing systems. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 1–67). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
  • Ohala, Manjari. (1983). Aspects of Hindi phonology. New Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass. Cited by7
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Pandey, Pramod. (2014). Akshara-to-sound rules for Hindi [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855622
    • Pandey, Pramod. (2003). Phonetic and phonological bases of Hindi orthography. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 41–61). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Pandey, Pramod. (2007). Phonology-orthography interface in Devanāgarī for Hindi [Special issue: Constraints on spelling changes, edited by Guido Nottbusch & Eliane Segers]. Written Language & Literacy, 10(2), 145–162.
    • Sircar, Shruti, & Nag, Sonali. (2019). Spelling and reading words in Bengali: The role of distributed phonology. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 161–179). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_9
    • Sproat, Richard. (2003). A formal computational analysis of Indic scripts. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 9–40). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2006). Brahmi-derived scripts, script layout, and segmental awareness [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.05spr
  • Oka, N., Mori, T., & Kakigi, S. (1979). Yoji no kanji to kana moji no yomi no gakushu [Learning to read kanji and kana by young children]. Shinrigaku Kenkyu [Japanese Journal of Psychology], 50, 49–52. Cited by4
    • Kess, Joseph F., & Miyamoto, Tadao. (1999). The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1995). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.3 [2014, Revised edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14)]
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
  • Okada, Takeshi. (2005). A corpus-based study of spelling errors of Japanese EFL writers with reference to errors occurring in word-initial and word-final positions. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (164–183). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters. Cited by3
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2014). Writing systems and language contact in the Euro- and Sinocentric worlds. Applied Linguistics Review, 5(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2014-0001
    • Okada, Takeshi. (2016). Japanese uses of the English writing system: A case study. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 397–412). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina. (2018). English compounds and their spelling (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Okada, Takeshi. (2016). Japanese uses of the English writing system: A case study. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 397–412). Oxon: Routledge. Cited by1
    • Joyce, Terry, & Masuda, Hisashi. (2018). Introduction to the multi-script Japanese writing system and word processing. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 179–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Okano, Kenji. (2003). Standardization of consonant ligature writings in Bagan Burmese. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 293–300). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
  • Olinghouse, Natalie G. (2008). Student- and instruction-level predictors of narrative writing in third-grade students [Special issue: Research on writing development, practice, instruction, and assessment, edited by Steve Graham]. Reading and Writing, 21(1/2), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9062-1 Cited by7
    • Ahmed, Yusra, & Wagner, Richard K. (2020). A “simple” illustration of a joint model of reading and writing using meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM). In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 55–75). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_4
    • Albuquerque, Cristina P. (2012). Rapid naming contributions to reading and writing acquisition of European Portuguese. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 775–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9299-6
    • Babayiğit, Selma, & Stainthorp, Rhona. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y
    • Kim, Young-Suk Grace. (2020). Interactive dynamic literacy model: An integrative theoretical framework for reading-writing relations. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 11–34). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_2
    • Olinghouse, Natalie G., & Leaird, Jacqueline T. (2009). The relationship between measures of vocabulary and narrative writing quality in second- and fourth-grade students. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9124-z
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Verheyden, Lieve, Van den Branden, Kris, Rijlaarsdam, Gert, Van den Bergh, Huub, & De Maeyer, Sven. (2010). Written narrations by 8- to 10-year-old Turkish pupils in Flemish primary education: A follow-up of seven text features [Special Issue:Writing development: Cognitive, sociocultural, linguistic perspectives, edited b Debra Myhill & Ros Fisher]. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01430.x
  • Olinghouse, Natalie G., & Leaird, Jacqueline T. (2009). The relationship between measures of vocabulary and narrative writing quality in second- and fourth-grade students. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9124-z Cited by2
    • Ahmed, Yusra, & Wagner, Richard K. (2020). A “simple” illustration of a joint model of reading and writing using meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM). In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 55–75). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_4
    • Dockrell, Julie E., & Connelly, Vincent. (2016). The relationships between oral and written sentence generation in English speaking children: The role of language and literacy skills. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 161–177). Cham: Springer.
  • Oliphant, G. W. (1983). Repetition and recency effects in word recognition. Australian Journal of Psychology, 35, 393–403. Cited by3
    • Gijsel, Martine A. R., van Bon, Wim H. J., & Bosman, Anna M. T. (2004). Assessing reading skills by means of paper-and-pencil lexical decision: Issues of reliability, repetition, and word-pseudoword ratio. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(5), 517–536.
    • Levy, Betty Ann, Barnes, Lauren, & Martin, Lisa. (1993). Transfer of fluency across repetitions and across texts. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 401–427. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 273–299). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Martin-Chang, Sandra Lyn, & Levy, Betty Ann. (2006). Word reading fluency: A transfer appropriate processing account of fluency transfer. Reading and Writing, 19(5), 517–542. https://doi.org/101007/s11145-006-9007-0
  • Olive, T. (2003). Working memory in writing: Empirical evidence from the dual task technique. European Psychologist, 9(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.9.1.32 Cited by5
    • Adams, Anne-Marie, Simmons, Fiona, Willis, Catherine, & Pawling, Ralph. (2010). Undergraduate students’ ability to revise text effectively: relationships with topic knowledge and working memory [Special Issue:Writing development: Cognitive, sociocultural, linguistic perspectives, edited b Debra Myhill & Ros Fisher]. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01432.x
    • Bourke, Lorna, & Adams, Anne-Marie. (2010). Cognitive constraints and the early learning goals in writing [Special Issue:Writing development: Cognitive, sociocultural, linguistic perspectives, edited b Debra Myhill & Ros Fisher]. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01434.x
    • Kamelifar, Leila, & Ali Salimi, Esmaeel. (2016). The effect of exposure to fluid intelligence components on learning sentence connectors of foreign language learners. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.05kam
    • Olive, Thierry, & Cislaru, Georgeta. (2015). Linguistic forms at the process-product interface: Analysing the linguistic content of bursts of production. In Georgeta Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface (pp. 99–123). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.06oli
    • Vanderberg, Robert, & Swanson, H. Lee. (2007). Which components of working memory are important in the writing process? Reading and Writing, 20(7), 721–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9046-6
  • Olive, T., Alves, R. A., & Castro, S. L. (2009). Cognitive processes in writing during pause and execution periods. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(5), 758–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802079850 Cited by9
    • Ailhaud, Emilie, Chenu, Florence, & Jisa, Harriet. (2016). A developmental perspective on the units of written French. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 287–305). Cham: Springer.
    • Chukharev-Hudilainen, Evgeny. (2019). Empowering automated writing evaluation with keystroke logging. In Eva Lindgren & Kirk P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (Studies in Writing 38) (pp. 125–142). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_007
    • Cislaru, Georgeta. (2015). Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface. In Georgeta Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface (pp. 1–17). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.01cis
    • Leijten, Mariëlle, Van Horenbeeck, Eric, & Van Waes, Luuk Van. (2019). Analysing keystroke logging data from a linguistic perspective. In Eva Lindgren & Kirk P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (Studies in Writing 38) (pp. 71–95). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_005
    • Lindgren, Eva, Knospe, Yvonne, & Sullivan, Kirk P. H. (2019). Researching writing with observational logging tools from 2006 to the present. In Eva Lindgren & Kirk P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (Studies in Writing 38) (pp. 1–29). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_002
    • Olive, Thierry, & Cislaru, Georgeta. (2015). Linguistic forms at the process-product interface: Analysing the linguistic content of bursts of production. In Georgeta Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface (pp. 99–123). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.06oli
    • Prior, Paul A. (2015). Writing, literate activity, semiotic remediation: A sociocultural approach. In Georgeta Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface (pp. 185–201). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.10pri
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Wagner. Richard K., Puranik, Cynthia S., Foorman, Barbara, Foster, Elizabeth, Wilson, Laura Gehron, Tschinkel, Erika, & Kantor, Patricia Thatcher. (2011). Modeling the development of written language [Special issue: Writing development from early to middle childhood, edited by Virgina W. Berninger, Brett Miller & Victoria J. Molfese]. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7
  • Olive, Thierry, & Cislaru, Georgeta. (2015). Linguistic forms at the process-product interface: Analysing the linguistic content of bursts of production. In Georgeta Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface (pp. 99–123). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.06oli Cited by1
    • Leijten, Mariëlle, Van Horenbeeck, Eric, & Van Waes, Luuk Van. (2019). Analysing keystroke logging data from a linguistic perspective. In Eva Lindgren & Kirk P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (Studies in Writing 38) (pp. 71–95). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_005
  • Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2002). Concurrent activation of high- and low-level production processes in written composition. Memory & Cognition, 30(4), 594–600. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194960 Cited by7
    • Alves, Rui A., Leal, José Paulo, & Limpo, Teresa. (2019). Using HandSpy to study writing in real time: A comparison between low- and high-quality texts in grade 2. In Eva Lindgren & Kirk P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (Studies in Writing 38) (pp. 30–49). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_004
    • Breuer, Esther Odilia. (2019). Fluency in L1 and FL writing: An analysis of planning, essay writing and final revision. In Eva Lindgren & Kirk P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (Studies in Writing 38) (pp. 190–211). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_010
    • Johansson, Roger, Wengelin, Åsa, Johansson, Victoria, & Holmqvist, Kenneth. (2010). Looking at the keyboard or the monitor: Relationship with text production processes. [Special issue: Reading during writing. What does eyetracking research tell us about the interaction between reading and writing processes during text production?, edited by Luuk Van Waes, Mariëlle, Leijten, & Åsa Wengelin]. Reading and Writing, 23(7), 835–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9189-3
    • Olive, Thierry, & Cislaru, Georgeta. (2015). Linguistic forms at the process-product interface: Analysing the linguistic content of bursts of production. In Georgeta Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface (pp. 99–123). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.06oli
    • Richards, Todd L., Berninger, Virginia W., Stock, Pat, Altemeier, Leah, Trivedi, Pamala, & Maravilla, Kenneth R. (2011). Differences between good and poor child writers on fMRI contrasts for writing newly taught and highly practiced letter forms. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9217-3
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Wagner. Richard K., Puranik, Cynthia S., Foorman, Barbara, Foster, Elizabeth, Wilson, Laura Gehron, Tschinkel, Erika, & Kantor, Patricia Thatcher. (2011). Modeling the development of written language [Special issue: Writing development from early to middle childhood, edited by Virgina W. Berninger, Brett Miller & Victoria J. Molfese]. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7
  • Olivier, J.-P. (1967), Les scribes de Cnossos. Essai de classement des archives d'un palais mycénien (Incunabula Graeca 17). Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo. Cited by6
    • Bennet, John. (2008). Now you see it; now you don't! The disappearance of the Linear A script on Crete. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 1–29). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020). Scribes as editors: Tracking changes in the Linear B documents. American Journal of Archaeology, 124(4), 523–549. https://doi.org/:10.3764/aja.124.4.0523
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
    • Karagianni, Angeliki. (2015). Linear B administration: The communicative aspects of written media and the organisation of the Mycenaean bureaucracy. In Susanne Enderwitz & Rebecca Sauer (Eds.), Communication and materiality: Written and unwritten communication in pre-modern societies (Materiale Textkulturen 8) (pp. 25–60). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2020a). Material entanglements of writing practices in the Bronze Age Aegean and Cyprus. Sustainability, 12, 10671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410671
  • Olivier, J.-P. (1986). Cretan writing in the second millennium B.C. World Archaeology, 17(3), 377–389. Cited by7
    • Colin, Loh Jia Sheng, & Cacciafoco, Francesco Perono. (2021). A new approach to the decipherment of Linear A, stage 2. Cryptanalysis and language deciphering: A “brute force attack” on an undeciphered writing system. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 927–943). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-cacc
    • Ferrara, Silvia, & Jasink, Anna Margherita. (2017). To have and to hold: Hieroglyphic seals as personal markers and objects of display. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 41–53). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Finlayson, Sarah. (2013). Form follows function: Writing and its supports in the Aegean Bronze Age. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 123–142). London: Ubiquity Press. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.g
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Whittaker, Helène. (2013). The function and meaning of writing in the Prehistoric Aegean: Some reflections on the social and symbolic significance of writing from a material perspective. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 105–121). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.f
  • Olivier, J.-P. (1989). The possible methods in deciphering the pictographic Cretan script. In Y. Duhoux, T. G. Palaima & J. Bennet (Eds.), Problems in decipherment (Bibliothèque des Cahiers de l'Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 49) (pp. 39–58). Louvain-La-Neuve: Peeters. Cited by5
    • Bennett, Emmett L. (1996). Aegean scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 125–133). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Flouda, Georgia. (2013). Materiality of Minoan writing: Modes of display and perception. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 143–174). London: Ubiquity Press. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.h
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
  • Olivier, Jean-Pierre. (2013). The development of Cypriot syllabaries, from Enkomi to Kafizin. In Philippa M. Steele (Ed.), Syllabic writing on Cyprus and its context (Cambridge Classical Studies) (pp. 7–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by5
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2013). A linguistic history of Ancient Cyprus: The non-Greek languages, and their relations with Greek, c.1600–300 BC (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2019). Writing and society in ancient Cyprus (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316729977
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
  • Olivier, J.-P., & Godart, L. (Eds.). (1996). Corpus hieroglyphicarum inscriptionum Cretae (Études Crétoises 31). Paris: De Boccard. Cited by12
    • Bennet, John. (2008). Now you see it; now you don't! The disappearance of the Linear A script on Crete. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 1–29). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Farmer, Steve, Sproat, Richard, & Witzel, Michael. (2004). The collapse of the Indus-script thesis: The myth of a literate Harappan civilization. Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 11(2), 19–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/ejvs.2004.2.620
    • Ferrara, Silvia, & Jasink, Anna Margherita. (2017). To have and to hold: Hieroglyphic seals as personal markers and objects of display. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 41–53). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Finlayson, Sarah. (2013). Form follows function: Writing and its supports in the Aegean Bronze Age. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 123–142). London: Ubiquity Press. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.g
    • Flouda, Georgia. (2013). Materiality of Minoan writing: Modes of display and perception. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 143–174). London: Ubiquity Press. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.h
    • Melka, Tomi S., & Schoch, Robert M. (2021). A case in point: Communication with unknown intelligence/s. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 513–559). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-melk
    • Militello, Pietro M. (2017). Management, power and non-literate communication in Prepalatial and Palatial Messara. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 55–72). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2017c). Writing «systems»: Literacy and the transmission of writing in nonadministrative contexts. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 153–172). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2013). Syllabic writing on Cyprus and its context (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Tomas, Helena. (2013). Saving on clay: The Linear B practice of cutting tablets. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 175–191). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.i
    • Whittaker, Helène. (2013). The function and meaning of writing in the Prehistoric Aegean: Some reflections on the social and symbolic significance of writing from a material perspective. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 105–121). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.f
  • Olivo, Warren. (2001). Phat lines: Spelling conventions in rap music. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 67–85.
  • Olofsson, Å., & Lundberg, I. (1983). Can phonemic awareness be trained in kindergarten? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 35–44. Cited by7
    • Bentin, Shlomo. (1992). Phonological awareness, reading, and reading acquisition: A survey and appraisal of current knowledge. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 193–210). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Dufva, Mia, Niemi, Pekka, & Voeten, Marinus J. M. (2001). The role of phonological memory, word recognition, and comprehension skills in reading development: From preschool to grade 2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1/2), 91–117.
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (2006). Alphabetics instruction helps students learn to read. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 649–677). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Hagtvet, Bente E. (2003). Listening comprehension and reading comprehension in poor decoders: Evidence for the importance of syntactic and semantic skills as well as phonological skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(6), 505–539.
    • Lyster, Solveig-Alma Halaas. (2002). The effects of morphological versus phonological awareness training in kindergarten on reading development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 261–294. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015272516220
    • Treutlein, Anke, Zöller, Isabelle, Roos, Jeanette, & Schöler, Hermann. (2008). Effects of phonological awareness training on reading achievement [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.03tre
    • Van Bon, Wim H. J., & Uit De Haag, Inge J. C. A. F. (1997). Difficulties with consonants in the spelling and segmentation of CCVCC pseudowords: Differences among Dutch first graders [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 363–386.
  • Olofsson, Å., & Lundberg, I. (1985). Evaluation of long term effects of phonemic awareness training in kindergarten: Illustrations of some methodological problems in evaluation research. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 26, 21–34. Cited by8
    • Dahlgren Sandberg, Annika. (1998). Reading and spelling among nonvocal children with cerebral palsy: Influence of home and school literacy environment. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 23–50.
    • Dahlgren Sandberg, Annika, & Hjelmquist, Erland. (1997). Language and literacy in nonvocal children with cerebral palsy. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 107–133.
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (2006). Alphabetics instruction helps students learn to read. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 649–677). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • González, Juan E. Jiménez. (1997). A reading-level match study of phonemic processes underlying reading disabilities in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(1), 23–40.
    • Hagtvet, Bente E. (2003). Listening comprehension and reading comprehension in poor decoders: Evidence for the importance of syntactic and semantic skills as well as phonological skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(6), 505–539.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Treutlein, Anke, Zöller, Isabelle, Roos, Jeanette, & Schöler, Hermann. (2008). Effects of phonological awareness training on reading achievement [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.03tre
  • Olofsson, A., & Niedersoe, J. (1999). Early language development and kindergarten phonological awareness as predictors of reading problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949903200512 Cited by5
    • Cain, Kate, Compton, Donald L., & Parrila, Rauno K. (2017c). Introduction to reading comprehension. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 237–238). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Mimran, R. Cohen. (2006). Reading disabilities among Hebrew-speaking children in upper elementary grades: The role of phonological and nonphonological language skills. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5461-3
    • Müller, Kurt, & Brady, Susan. (2001). Correlates of early reading performance in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 757–799.
    • Smith, Susan Lambrecht. (2009). Early phonological and lexical markers of reading disabilities. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9101-y
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Reitsma, Pieter, & Siegel, Linda S. (2011). Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9232-4
  • Olson, A., & Cararnazza, A. (1994). Representation and connectionist models: The NETspell experience. In G. D. A. Brown & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention (pp. 337–363). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Cited by4
    • Deavers, Rachael P., & Brown, Gordon D. A. (1997). Rules versus analogies in children's spelling: Evidence for task dependence [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 339–361.
    • Kaminska, Zofia. (2003). Little Frog and Toad: Interaction of orthography and phonology in Polish spelling [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 61–80.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Olson, D. R. (1977a). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47(3), 257–281. Cited by35
    • Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [2007, Second edition]
    • Biber, Douglas. (2009). Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 75–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Carlisle, Joanne F., & Beeman, Margaret M. (2000). The effects of language of instruction on the reading and writing achievement of first-grade Hispanic children [Special issue: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends, edited by Esther Geva & Ludo Verhoeven]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 331–353.
    • Cook-Gumperz, Jenny (Ed.). (2006). The social construction of literacy (Second edition) (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [1986, First edition]
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2016). Sociolinguistics and the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 261–274). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Davidson, Andrew. (2019). Writing: The re-construction of language. Language Sciences, 72, 134–149. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.09.004
    • Fichtner, Bernd. (1986). Wie lernen Kinder lesen und schreiben? - Aspekte einer pädagogischen Fragestellung [How do children learn to read and to write? - Aspects of a pedagogical problem]. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 444–462). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Hornberger, Nancy H. (1994). Oral and literate cultures. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 424–431). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Kellogg, Ronald T. (1994). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Koda, Keiko. (1995). Cognitive consequences of L1 and L2 orthographies. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 311–326). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Lillis, Theresa. (2013). The sociolinguistics of writing (Edinburgh Sociolinguistics). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    • Linell, Per. (1982). The written language bias in linguistics (Studies in Comrnunication 2). Linköping: Linköping University.
    • Linell, Per. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations (Routledge Advances in Communication and Linguistic Theory). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Marcel, Tony, & Barnard, Philip. (1979). Paragraphs of pictographs: The use of non-verbal instructions for equipment. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 501–518). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Martlew, Margaret. (1983). The development of writing: Communication and cognition. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 257–275). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Olson, David R. (1988). Mind, media, and memory: The archival and epistemic functions of written text. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 422–441). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678466
    • Olson, David R., & Hildyard, Angela. (1983). Literacy and the comprehension and expression of literal meaning. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 291–325). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Olson, David R., & Oatley, Keith. (2014). The quotation theory of writing. Written Communication, 31(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515164
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Scribner, Sylvia, & Cole, Michael. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
    • Smith, Frank. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [1978, second edition; 1982, third edition; 1988, fourth edition; 1994, fifth edition; 2004, sixth edition, Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Street, Brian. (2009). Ethnography of writing and reading. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 329–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Street, Brian V., & Lefstein, Adam. (2007). Literacy: An advanced resource book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Walters, Keith. (1994). Writing and education. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 638–645). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Weth, Constanze, & Juffermans, Kasper. (2018b). Introduction: The tyranny of writing in language and society. In Constanze Weth & Kasper Juffermans (Eds.), Tyranny of writing: Ideologies of the written word (Bloomsbury Advances in Sociolinguistics) (pp. 1–17). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    • Wright, Patricia. (1980). Textual literacy: An outline sketch of psychological research on reading and writing. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 517–535). New York; London: Plenum Press.
  • Olson, D. R. (1977b). The language of instruction: On the literate bias of schooling. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. W. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 65–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by4
    • Graff, Harvey J. (1987a). The labyrinths of literacy: Reflections on literacy past and present. London: The Falmer Press. [1995, Revised and expanded edition, (Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture), Pittsburgh, PA; London: University of Pittsburgh Press]
    • Scribner, Sylvia, & Cole, Michael. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Walters, Keith. (1994). Writing and education. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 638–645). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Olson, D. R. (1982). What is said and what is meant in speech and writing. Visible Language, 16(2), 151–161. Cited by4
    • Augst, Gerhard, & Müller, Karin. (1996). Die schriftliche Sprache im Deutschen [Written language: German]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1500–1506). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Dahlgren Sandberg, Annika, & Hjelmquist, Erland. (1997). Language and literacy in nonvocal children with cerebral palsy. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 107–133.
    • Hannas, William C. (2003). The writing on the wall: How Asian orthography curbs creativity (Encounters with Asia). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. (2000). Sejong's theory of literacy and writing [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin w. Kim, Elmer H., Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 13–45.
  • Olson, D. R. (1986). The cognitive consequences of literacy. Canadian Psychology, 27(2), 109–121. Cited by3
    • Berry, John W., & Bennett, Jo Anne. (1995). Syllabic literacy and cognitive performance among the Cree and Ojibwe people of Northern Canada. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 341–357). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Bolter, Jay David. (1991). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [2001, Second edition]
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Olson, David R. (1988). Mind, media, and memory: The archival and epistemic functions of written text. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 422–441). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer. Cited by1
    • Bhatt, Prath M. (1988). Graphic systems, phonic systems, and linguistic representations. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 106–120). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Olson, D. R. (1991). Literacy as a metalinguistic activity. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Literacy and orality (pp. 251–270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by7
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Hannas, William C. (2003). The writing on the wall: How Asian orthography curbs creativity (Encounters with Asia). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Hornberger, Nancy H. (1994). Oral and literate cultures. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 424–431). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Kolinsky, Régine. (2015). How learning to read influences language and cognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 377–393). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Raible, Wolfgang. (1994). Orality and literacy. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 1–17). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Sabatini, John. (2005). What does it mean to comprehend or construct meaning in multimedia environments: Thoughts on cognitive and assessment construct development. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 149–172). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Olson, D. R. (1993). How writing represents speech. Language & Communication, 13(1):1–17. Cited by6
    • Davidson, Andrew. (2019). Writing: The re-construction of language. Language Sciences, 72, 134–149. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.09.004
    • Evertz, Martin. (2018). Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441
    • Harris, Roy. (2000). Rethinking writing. London; New York: Continuum.
    • Harris, Roy. (2009). Speech and writing. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 46–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609664.004
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Tollini, Aldo. (2012). Symmetry and asymmetry, Chinese writing in Japan: The case of Kojiki (712). In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 169–179). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by95
    • Ahlberg, Aija Katriina. (2020). How abugida readers learn alphabetic literacy skills: The role of phonological awareness in the transfer process in the Konso language, Southwest Ethiopia (JYU Dissertations 237). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-8188-4
    • Alves, Rui A., Limpo, Teresa., & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2020). Introduction to reading-writing connections: The integration roads ahead. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 1–7). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_1
    • Aram, Dorit, & Levin, Iris. (2004). The role of maternal mediation of writing to kindergartners in promoting literacy achievements in second grade: A longitudinal perspective. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(4), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000032665.14437.e0
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2004). Rethinking written culture [A discussion of R. Harris, (2000), Rethinking writing]. Language Sciences, 26, 57–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2003.06.001
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2013). Reading in print or onscreen: Better, worse, or about the same? In Deborah Tannen & Anna Marie Trester (Eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media (pp. 201–224). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    • Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [2007, Second edition]
    • Berman, Ruth A. (2016). Linguistic literacy and later language development. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 181–200). Cham: Springer.
    • Berman, Ruth A., & Nir, Bracha. (2010). The lexicon in writing-speech-differentiation: Developmental perspectives [Special issue: Developmental aspects of written language, edited by Sofía A. Vernon & Mónica Alvarado]. Written Language & Literacy, 13(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.2.01ber
    • Berman, Ruth A., & Ravid, Dorit. (2009). Becoming a literate language user: Oral and written text construction across adolescence. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 92–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Brockmeier, Jens, & Olson, David R. (2009). The literacy episteme: From Innis to Derrida. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 3–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Chemla, Karine. (2009). Literacy and the history of science: Reflections based on Chinese and other sources. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 253–270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Chrisomalis, Stephen. (2009). The origins and co-evolution of literacy and numeracy. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 59–74). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    • Cook-Gumperz, Jenny (Ed.). (2006). The social construction of literacy (Second edition) (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [1986, First edition]
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2016). Sociolinguistics and the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 261–274). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2019). „Die Buchstabenschrift ist an und für sich die intelligentere.‟ Überlegungen zur Bewertung von Schriftsystemen. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st Century: Brest, June 13-15, 2018, Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 1–16). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-coul
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996c). The first civilization. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 21–32). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996j). Analog and digital writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 883–892). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Davidson, Andrew. (2019). Writing: The re-construction of language. Language Sciences, 72, 134–149. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.09.004
    • Dichy, Joseph. (2017). The analytics of writing, exemplified by Arabic, the youngest of the Semitic scripts. In Manuel Sartori, Manuela E. B. Giolfo, & Philippe Cassuto (Eds), Approaches to the history and dialectology of Arabic in honor of Pierre Larcher (Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics 88) (pp. 29–56). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Evertz, Martin. (2018). Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441
    • Eviatar, Zohar, & Share, David. (2013). Processing Semitic writing systems: Introduction to a special issue of Writing Systems Research [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.863086
    • Garton, Alison F., & Pratt, Chris. (2009). Cultural and developmental predispositions to literacy. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 501–517). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Gee, James Paul. (2009). Literacy, video games, and popular culture. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 313–325). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Habinek, Thomas. (2009). Situating literacy at Rome. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 114–140). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Handel, Zev. (2019). Sinography: The borrowing and adaptation of the Chinese script (Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis 1). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352223
    • Hannam, Rachel, Frazer, Helen, & Byrne, Brian. (2007). The sbelling of sdops: Preliterate children's spelling of stops after /s/. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9038-6
    • Hannas, William C. (2003). The writing on the wall: How Asian orthography curbs creativity (Encounters with Asia). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Harris, Roy. (2000). Rethinking writing. London; New York: Continuum.
    • Harris, Roy. (2009). Speech and writing. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 46–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609664.004
    • Hertz-Lazarowitz, Rachel. (2004). Storybook writing in first grade. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(3), 267–299.
    • Homer, Bruce D. (2009). Literacy and metalinguistic development. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 487–500). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Homer, Bruce D., & Olson, David R. (1999). Literacy and children's conception of words. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.07hom
    • Johnson, William A. (2009a). Introduction. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 3–10). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. (2000). Sejong's theory of literacy and writing [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin w. Kim, Elmer H., Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 13–45.
    • Kress, Gunther. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London; New York: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203164754
    • Kurvers, Jeanne. (2015). Emerging literacy in adult second-language learners: A synthesis of research findings in the Netherlands [Special issue: Adolescents and adults who develop literacy for the first time in L2, edited by Martha Young-Scholten]. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.943149
    • Kurvers, Jeanne, Van Hout, Roeland, & Vallen, Ton. (2009). Print awareness of adult illiterates: A comparison with young pre-readers and low-educated adult readers. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 863–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9129-7
    • Kurzon, Dennis. (2013). Diacritics and the Perso-Arabic script [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 234–243, https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.799451
    • Lillis, Theresa. (2013). The sociolinguistics of writing (Edinburgh Sociolinguistics). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    • Linell, Per. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations (Routledge Advances in Communication and Linguistic Theory). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Lyons, Martyn, & Marquilhas, Rita (Eds.). (2017). Approaches to the history of written culture: A world inscribed (New Directions in Book History). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54136-5
    • McDougall, Siné, Brunswick, Nicola, & de Mornay Davies, Paul. (2010). Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies: An introduction and overview. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 3–21). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2018). What is natural in writing? Prolegomena to a Natural Grapholinguistics [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00010.mel
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Mikulska, Katarzyna. (2019a). Introduction: Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach [translation by Jerome A. Offner]. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 3–22). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c000b
    • Mikulska, Katarzyna. (2019b). The system of graphic communication in the Central Mexican divinatory codices from the functional perspective [translation by Jerome A. Offner]. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 41–92). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c002
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Norris, Stephen P., & Phillips, Linda M. (2009). Scientific literacy. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 271–285). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (1988). Mind, media, and memory: The archival and epistemic functions of written text. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 422–441). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Olson, David R. (1994c). Writing and science. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 654–657). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Olson, David R. (2009a). A theory of reading/writing: From literacy to literature. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp005
    • Olson, David R. (2009b). Literacy, literacy policy, and the school. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 566–576). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2012). Literacy, rationality, and logic: The historical and developmental origins of logical discourse [Special issue: Units of language – units of writing, edited by Terry Joyce & David Roberts]. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.2.02ols
    • Olson, David R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678466
    • Olson, David R., & Oatley, Keith. (2014). The quotation theory of writing. Written Communication, 31(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515164
    • Olson, David R., & Torrance, Nancy. (2009). Preface. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. xiii-xxi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ong, Walter J. (1992). Writing is a technology that restructures thought. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 293–319). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Overmann, Karenleigh A. (2016). Beyond writing: The development of literacy in the ancient Near East. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000019
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Ramachandra, Vijayachandra, & Karanth, Prathibha. (2007). The role of literacy in the conceptualization of words: Data from Kannada-speaking children and non-literate adults. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9000-7
    • Ravid, Dorit. (2006a). Hebrew orthography and literacy. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Ravid, Dorit Diskin. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling (Literacy Studies 3). New York: Springer.
    • Ravid, Dorit, & Chen-Djemal, Yehudit. (2015). Spoken and written narration in Hebrew: A case study. Written Language & Literacy, 18(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.03rav
    • Ravid, Dorit, & Schiff, Rachel. (2006). Roots and patterns in Hebrew language development: Evidence from written morphological analogies. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 789–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9004-3
    • Ravid, Dorit, Shalom, Tsila, Dattner, Elitzur, Katzenberger, Irit, & Sha'shoua, Guy. (2016). Top-down measures in 7th grade writing: The effects of genre and SES. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 345–359). Cham: Springer.
    • Roberts, David, & Joyce, Terry. (2012). Introduction to special issue on ‘Units of Language – Units of Writing’: A key relationship for writing systems research [Special issue: Units of language – units of writing, edited by Terry Joyce & David Roberts]. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.2.01rob
    • Robinson, Andrew. (1995). The story of writing: Alphabets, hieroglyphs & pictograms. London: Thames & Hudson. [2007, Revised edition]
    • Saenger, Paul. (1997). Space between words: The origins of silent reading (Figurae: Reading Medieval Culture). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    • Sandbank, Ana. (2016). Writing as a domain of knowledge for both children and researchers. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 109–124). Cham: Springer.
    • Sawyer, R. Keith. (2002). [Book review: Jack Goody, (2000), The power of the written tradition]. Written Language & Literacy, 5(1), 127–131.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Share, David L., Leikin, Mark, & Kozminsky, Ely. (2008). On the benefits of bi-literacy: Just a head start in reading or specific orthographic insights? Reading and Writing, 21(9), 905–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9097-3
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Share, David L. (2020). Extricating reading science from entrenched anglocentricism, eurocentricism, and alphabetism and embracing global diversity: A personal journey. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 4(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.28987/ijrld.4.2.3
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Street, Brian. (2009). Ethnography of writing and reading. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 329–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Street, Brian V., & Lefstein, Adam. (2007). Literacy: An advanced resource book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Teberosky, Ana, Sepúlveda, Angélica, & Costa e Sousa, Otília. (2020). Orality, reading and writing in early literacy. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 85–105). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_6
    • Thonhauser, Ingo. (2003). “Written language but easily to use!”: Perceptions of continuity and discontinuity between written/oral modes in the Lebanese context of biliteracy and diglossia. Written Language & Literacy, 6(1), 93–110.
    • Tolchinsky, Liliana. (2009). The configuration of literacy as a domain of knowledge. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 468–486). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Tolchinsky, Liliana. (2010). Becoming literate in a foreign language. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 177–190). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_13
    • Tolchinsky, Liliana. (2020). Text writing at the core of literacy discourse. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 163–168). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_10
    • van Holthoon, Frits. (2009). Literacy, modernization, the intellectual community, and civil society in the Western world. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 431–448). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Veldhuis, Dorina, & Kurvers, Jeanne. (2012). Offline segmentation and online language processing units: The influence of literacy [Special issue: Units of language – units of writing, edited by Terry Joyce & David Roberts]. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.2.03vel
    • Vernon, Sofía A., Calderón, Gabriela, & Castro, Luis. (2004). The relationship between phonological awareness and writing in Spanish-speaking kindergartners [Special issue: Process and acquisition of written language, edited by Robert Schreuder & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(1), 101–118.
    • Wagner, Daniel A. (2009). New technologies for adult literacy and international development. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 548–565). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Werner, Shirley. (2009). Literacy studies in classics: The last twenty years. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 333–382). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Zadka, Małgorzata. (2018). Semasiographic principle in Linear B inscriptions. Writing Systems Research, 10(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2019.1588835
  • Olson, David R. (1994b). Writing and industrialization. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 635–638). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Olson, David R. (1994c). Writing and science. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 654–657). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. Cited by1
    • Werner, Shirley. (2009). Literacy studies in classics: The last twenty years. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 333–382). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Olson, D. R. (1996). Toward a psychology of literacy: On the relations between speech and writing. Cognition, 60, 83–104. Cited by9
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Cook, Vivian. (2004). The English writing system. (The English Language series). London Hodder Arnold. [2014, reprinted, London: New York: Routledge]
    • Cook, Vivian. (2005). Written language and foreign language teaching. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 424–441). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Kurvers, Jeanne. (2015). Emerging literacy in adult second-language learners: A synthesis of research findings in the Netherlands [Special issue: Adolescents and adults who develop literacy for the first time in L2, edited by Martha Young-Scholten]. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.943149
    • Nunes, Terezinha, Bryant, P., & Bindman, Miriam. (2006). The effects of learning to spell on children's awareness of morphology [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 767–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9025-y
    • Petersson, Karl Magnus, Ingvar, Martin, & Reis, Alexandra. (2009). Language and literacy from a cognitive neuroscience perspective. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 152–181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Post, Yolanda V., & Carreker, Suzanne. (2002). Orthographic similarity and phonological transparency in spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 317–340.
    • Veldhuis, Dorina, & Kurvers, Jeanne. (2012). Offline segmentation and online language processing units: The influence of literacy [Special issue: Units of language – units of writing, edited by Terry Joyce & David Roberts]. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.2.03vel
  • Olson, David. (1997). On the relations between speech and writing. In Clotilde Pontecorvo (Ed.), Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6) (pp. 3–20). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. Cited by1
    • Kurvers, Jeanne, Van Hout, Roeland, & Vallen, Ton. (2009). Print awareness of adult illiterates: A comparison with young pre-readers and low-educated adult readers. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 863–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9129-7
  • Olson, David R. (2009a). A theory of reading/writing: From literacy to literature. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp005 Cited by2
    • Olson, David R. (2012). Literacy, rationality, and logic: The historical and developmental origins of logical discourse [Special issue: Units of language – units of writing, edited by Terry Joyce & David Roberts]. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.2.02ols
    • Olson, David R., & Oatley, Keith. (2014). The quotation theory of writing. Written Communication, 31(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515164
  • Olson, David R. (2009b). Literacy, literacy policy, and the school. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 566–576). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Olson, David R. (2009c). Why literacy matters, then and now. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 385–403). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by1
    • Woolf, Greg (2015). Ancient illiteracy? Ancient literacies: Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 58(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.2015.12010.x
  • Olson, David R. (2010). Whatever happened to pedagogical theory? In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 223–234). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_16
  • Olson, David R. (2012). Literacy, rationality, and logic: The historical and developmental origins of logical discourse [Special issue: Units of language – units of writing, edited by Terry Joyce & David Roberts]. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.2.02ols
  • Olson, David R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678466 Cited by3
    • Alves, Rui A., Limpo, Teresa., & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2020). Introduction to reading-writing connections: The integration roads ahead. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 1–7). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_1
    • Davidson, Andrew. (2019). Writing: The re-construction of language. Language Sciences, 72, 134–149. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.09.004
    • Tolchinsky, Liliana. (2020). Text writing at the core of literacy discourse. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 163–168). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_10
  • Olson, D. R., & Astington, J. W. (1990). Talking about text: How literacy contributes to thought. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(5), 557–573. Cited by6
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Beers, Scott F., & Nagy, William E. (2009). Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre? Reading and Writing, 22(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9107-5
    • Beers, Scott F., & Nagy, William E. (2011). Writing development in four genres from grades three to seven: Syntactic complexity and genre differentiation [Special issue: Writing development from early to middle childhood, edited by Virgina W. Berninger, Brett Miller & Victoria J. Molfese]. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9264-9
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2009b). Literacy, literacy policy, and the school. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 566–576). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678466
  • Olson, David R., & Hildyard, Angela. (1983). Literacy and the comprehension and expression of literal meaning. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 291–325). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
  • Olson, David R., & Oatley, Keith. (2014). The quotation theory of writing. Written Communication, 31(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515164 Cited by3
    • Davidson, Andrew. (2019). Writing: The re-construction of language. Language Sciences, 72, 134–149. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.09.004
    • Olson, David R. (2012). Literacy, rationality, and logic: The historical and developmental origins of logical discourse [Special issue: Units of language – units of writing, edited by Terry Joyce & David Roberts]. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.2.02ols
    • Olson, David R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678466
  • Olson, David R., & Torrance, Nancy. (2009). Preface. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. xiii-xxi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Olson, David R., & Torrance, Nancy (Eds.). (1991). Literacy and orality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by12
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Hannas, William C. (2003). The writing on the wall: How Asian orthography curbs creativity (Encounters with Asia). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Hornberger, Nancy H. (1994). Oral and literate cultures. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 424–431). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Raible, Wolfgang. (1994). Orality and literacy. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 1–17). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Sabatini, John. (2005). What does it mean to comprehend or construct meaning in multimedia environments: Thoughts on cognitive and assessment construct development. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 149–172). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Street, Brian V., & Lefstein, Adam. (2007). Literacy: An advanced resource book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (1994a). Demographics of literacy. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 767–779). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Olson, David R., & Torrance, Nancy (Eds.). (2001). The making of literate societies. Oxford: Blackwell. Cited by8
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Dávalos, Amira, & Alvarado, Mónica. (2010). Elementary school children's decisions about paragraph organization [Special issue: Developmental aspects of written language, edited by Sofía A. Vernon & Mónica Alvarado]. Written Language & Literacy, 13(2), 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.2.04dav
    • Münch, Christian, & Noack, Christina. (2020). From the oral-literate debate to the translanguaging paradigm – and back again: A German perspective on multilingual writing strategies [Special issue: Literacies in contact, edited by Constanze Weth & Manuela Böhm, in collaboration Daniel Bunčić]. Written Language & Literacy, 23(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00041.mun
    • Olson, David R., & Torrance, Nancy. (2009). Preface. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. xiii-xxi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Thomas, Rosalind. (2009a). The origins of western literacy: Literacy in ancient Greece and Rome. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 346–361). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Thomas, Rosalind. (2009b). Writing, reading, public and private “literacies”: Functional literacy and democratic literacy in Greece. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 13–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Wagner, Daniel A. (2009). New technologies for adult literacy and international development. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 548–565). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Werner, Shirley. (2009). Literacy studies in classics: The last twenty years. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 333–382). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Olson, David R., & Torrance, Nancy (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge handbook of literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by3
    • Berman, Ruth, Nayditz, Ronit, & Ravid, Dorit. (2011). Linguistic diagnostics of written texts in two school-age populations. Written Language & Literacy, 14(2), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.01ber
    • Neijt, Anneke. (2012). [Book review: David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), (2009), The Cambridge handbook of literacy]. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.07nei
    • Olson, David R. (2009a). A theory of reading/writing: From literacy to literature. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp005
  • Olson, David R., Torrance, Nancy, & Hildyard, Angela (Eds.). (1985). Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by14
    • Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [2007, Second edition]
    • Bhatt, Prath M. (1988). Graphic systems, phonic systems, and linguistic representations. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 106–120). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • de Kerckhove, Derrick. (1988a). Logical principles underlying the layout of Greek orthography. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 153–172). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Giere, Ursula. (1994). Entwicklung von Literalität und Alphabetisierung in England und Nordamerika [The development and advancement of literacy in England and North America]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 873–883). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Johnson, Merieta. (1994). Literacy movements in Central and South America and in the Carribean. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 824–834). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Leong, Che Kan. (1995). Orthographic and psycholinguistic considerations in developing literacy in Chinese. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 163–183). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Raible, Wolfgang. (1994). Orality and literacy. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 1–17). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Ravid, Dorit, & Chen-Djemal, Yehudit. (2015). Spoken and written narration in Hebrew: A case study. Written Language & Literacy, 18(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.03rav
    • Schaefer, Ronald P. (1992). Interpreting Emai orthographic strategies. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 153–168). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Smith, Frank. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [1978, second edition; 1982, third edition; 1988, fourth edition; 1994, fifth edition; 2004, sixth edition, Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Werner, Shirley. (2009). Literacy studies in classics: The last twenty years. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 333–382). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Olson, R. K. (1994). Language deficits in ‘specific’ reading disability. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 895–916). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Cited by8
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, & Taha, Haitham. (2004). Reading and spelling error analysis of native Arabic dyslexic readers [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 651–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2657-x
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, & Taha, Haitham. (2006b). Reading in Arabic orthography: Characteristics, research findings, and assessment. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron, (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 321–338). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Gottardo, Alexandra, Chiappe, Penny, Siegel, Linda S., & Stanovich, Keith E. (1999). Patterns of word and nonword processing in skilled and less-skilled readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 465–487.
    • Hagtvet, Bente E. (2003). Listening comprehension and reading comprehension in poor decoders: Evidence for the importance of syntactic and semantic skills as well as phonological skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(6), 505–539.
    • Mody, Maria. (2003). Phonological basis in reading disability: A review and analysis of the evidence [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 21–39.
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Fowler, Anne E. (2004). Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(5), 483–515. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044598.81628.e6
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Wolf, Maryanne, O'Rourke, Alyssa Goldberg, Gidney, Calvin, Lovett, Maureen, Cirino, Paul, & Morris, Robin. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013816320290
  • Olson, R. K. (2004). SSSR, environment, and genes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0802_1 Cited by8
    • Betjemann, Rebecca S., Willcutt, Erik G., Olson, Richard K., Keenan, Janice M., DeFries, John C., & Wadsworth, Sally J. (2008). Word reading and reading comprehension: stability, overlap and independence. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9076-8
    • Bus, A. G., & Out, D. (2009). Unraveling genetic and environmental components of early literacy: A twin study. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9115-0
    • Moats, Louisa. (2009). Knowledge foundations for teaching reading and spelling [Special issue: Perspectives on teachers' disciplinary knowledge of reading processes, development, and pedagogy, edited by Anne Cunningham & Jamie Zibulsky]. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9162-1
    • Olson, Richard K. (2007). Introduction to the special issue on genes, environment, and reading [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9015-0
    • Olson, Richard K. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on word-reading skills. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 233–253). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Olson, Richard K., Keenan, Janice M., Byrne, Brian, & Samuelsson, Stefan. (2017). Genetic and environmental influences on the development of reading and related skills. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 33–53). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Royer, James M., & Walles, Rena. (2008). Fluency training as an alternative intervention for reading-disabled and poor readers. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 327–353). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Samuelsson, Stefan, Olson, Richard, Wadsworth, Sally, Corley, Robin, DeFries, John C., Willcutt, Erik, Hulslander, Jacqueline, & Byrne, Brian. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on prereading skills and early reading and spelling development in the United States, Australia, and Scandinavia [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9018-x
  • Olson, Richard K. (2006). Genetics?? and environmental influences on the development of reading and related cognitive skills. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 693–707). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Olson, Richard K. (2007). Introduction to the special issue on genes, environment, and reading [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9015-0
  • Olson, Richard K. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on word-reading skills. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 233–253). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Olson, Richard, & Datta, Helen. (2002). Visual-temporal processing in reading-disabled and normal twins [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 127–149. Cited by5
    • Abu Ahmad, Hanadi, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Share, David L. (2014). Cognitive predictors of early reading ability in Arabic: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to grade 2. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 171–194). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Klein, Raymond M. (2002). Observations on the temporal correlates of reading failure [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 207–232.
    • Olson, Richard K. (2006). Genetics?? and environmental influences on the development of reading and related cognitive skills. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 693–707). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Savage, Robert. (2004). Motor skills, automaticity and developmental dyslexia: A review of the research literature. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(3), 301–324.
  • Olson, R. K., Datta, H., Gayan, J., & DeFries, J. (1999). A behavioral-genetic analysis of reading disabilities and component processes. In R. M. Klein & P. McMullen (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia (pp. 133–152). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cited by5
    • Klein, Raymond M. (2002). Observations on the temporal correlates of reading failure [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 207–232.
    • Little, Callie W., Wang, Frances, & Hart, Sara A. (2016). Behavioral and molecular genetic influences on reading-related outcomes. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 14–32). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Olson, Richard K. (2006). Genetics?? and environmental influences on the development of reading and related cognitive skills. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 693–707). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Olson, Richard K. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on word-reading skills. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 233–253). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Olson, R. K., Forsberg, H., & Wise, B. (1994). Genes, environment, and the development of orthographic skills. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge. Volume 1: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 27–71). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. Cited by18
    • Aaron, P. G., Joshi, R. M., Ayotollah, Mahboobeh, Ellsberry, Annie, Henderson, Janet, & Lindsey, Kim. (1999). Decoding and sight-word naming: Are they independent components of word recognition skill? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(2), 89–127.
    • Amtmann, Dagmar, Abbott, Robert D., & Berninger, V. W. (2007). Mixture growth models of RAN and RAS row by row: Insight into the reading system at work over time. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 785–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9041-y
    • Boada, Richard, Willcutt, Erik G., Tunick, Rachel A., Chhabildas, Nomita A., Olson, Richard K., DeFries, John C., & Pennington, Bruce F. (2002). A twin study of the etiology of high reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 683–707.
    • Byrne, Brian, Samuelsson, Stefan, Wadsworth, Sally, Hulslander, Jacqueline, Corley, Robin, DeFries, John C., Quain, Peter, Willcutt, Erik G., & Olson, Richard K. (2007). Longitudinal twin study of early literacy development: Preschool through Grade 1 [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9019-9
    • Conners, Frances A. (2009). Attentional control and the Simple View of reading. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9126-x
    • Garcia, Noelia P., Abbott, Robert D., & Berninger, Virginia W. (2010). Predicting poor, average, and superior spellers in grades 1 to 6 from phonological, orthographic, and morphological, spelling, or reading composites. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 61–98. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.03gar
    • Hagiliassis, Nick, Pratt, Chris, & Johnston, Michael. (2006). Orthographic and phonological processes in reading. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4123-9
    • Jackson, Nancy Ewald, Chen, Huanwen, Goldsberry, Lonie, Kim, Ahyoung, & Vanderwerff, Carla. (1999). Effects of variations in orthographic information on Asian and American readers' English text reading [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 345–379.
    • Llaurado, Anna, & Tolchinsky, Liliana. (2016). The developmental pattern of spelling in Catalan from first to fifth school grade. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.1000812
    • Luo, Yang C., Chen, Xi., Deacon, S. Hélène, & Li, Hong. (2011). Development of Chinese orthographic processing: A cross-cultural perspective [Special issue: Linguistic and cognitive factors in reading Chinese, edited by Xi Chen & Yang C. Luo]. Writing Systems Research, 3(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr008
    • O'Connor, Rollanda E., & Padeliadu, Susana. (2000). Blending versus whole word approaches in first grade remedial reading: Short-term and delayed effects on reading and spelling words. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 159–182.
    • Olson, Richard K. (2006). Genetics?? and environmental influences on the development of reading and related cognitive skills. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 693–707). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Olson, Richard K. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on word-reading skills. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 233–253). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Olson, Richard, & Datta, Helen. (2002). Visual-temporal processing in reading-disabled and normal twins [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 127–149.
    • Petrill, Stephen A., Deater-Deckard, Kirby, Thompson, Lee Ann, Schatschneider, Chris, Dethorne, Laura S., & Vendenbergh, David J. (2007). Longitudinal genetic analysis of early reading: The Western Reserve Reading Project [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9021-2
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Wolff, Ulrika. (2010). Subgrouping of readers based on performance measures: A latent profile analysis. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9160-8
  • Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B. & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 243–268). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Cited by26
    • Barr, Cathy L., & Couto, Jillian M. (2008). Molecular genetics of reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 255–281). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Bekebrede, Judith, van der Leij, Aryan, & Share, David L. (2009). Dutch dyslexic adolescents: Phonological-core variable-orthographic differences. Reading and Writing, 22(2), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9105-7
    • Cho, Jeung-Ryeul. (2018). Cognitive-linguistic skills and reading and writing in Korean Hangul, Chinese Hanja, and English among Korean children. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 391–410). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Commissaire, Eva, Pasquarella, Adrian, Chen, Xi, & Deacon, S. Hélène. (2014). The development of orthographic processing skills in children in early French immersion programs [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.02com
    • Conrad, Nicole J., & Levy, Betty Ann. (2007). Letter processing and the formation of memory representations in children with naming speed deficits. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9028-8
    • Conrad, Nicole J., & Levy, Betty Ann. (2011). Training letter and orthographic pattern recognition in children with slow naming speed. Reading and Writing, 24(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9202-x
    • Cunningham, Anne E., Perry, Kathryn E., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011100226798
    • Hagiliassis, Nick, Pratt, Chris, & Johnston, Michael. (2006). Orthographic and phonological processes in reading. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4123-9
    • Keenan, Janice M., & Betjemann, Rebecca S. (2008a). Comprehension of single words: The role of semantics in word identification and reading disability. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 191–210). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Landi, Nicole. (2010). An examination of the relationship between reading comprehension, higher-level and lower-level reading sub-skills in adults. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9180-z
    • Leinonen, Seija, Müller, Kurt, Leppänen, Paavo H. T., Aro, Mikko, Ahonen, Timo, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2001). Heterogeneity in adult dyslexic readers: Relating processing skills to the speed and accuracy of oral text reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 265–296.
    • McClung, Nicola A., O'Donnell, Colleen R., & Cunningham, Anne E. (2012). Orthographic learning and the development of visual word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 173–195). London: Psychology Press.
    • McGuinness, Diane. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Miller-Guron, Louise, & Lundberg, Ingvar. (2000). Dyslexia and second language reading: A second bite at the apple? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 41–61.
    • Morfidi, Eleni, van der Leij, Aryan, de Jong, Peter F., Scheltinga, Femke, & Bekebrede, Judith. (2007). Reading in two orthographies: A cross-linguistic study of Dutch average and poor readers who learn English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 753–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9035-9
    • Olson, Richard K. (2006). Genetics?? and environmental influences on the development of reading and related cognitive skills. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 693–707). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Olson, Richard K. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on word-reading skills. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 233–253). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Olson, Richard, & Datta, Helen. (2002). Visual-temporal processing in reading-disabled and normal twins [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 127–149.
    • Olson, Richard K., Keenan, Janice M., Byrne, Brian, & Samuelsson, Stefan. (2019). Etiology of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 391–412). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.018
    • Priebe, Sarah J., Keenan, Janice M., & Miller, Amanda C. (2012). How prior knowledge affects word identification and comprehension. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9260-0
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Sparks, Richard L. (2004). Orthographic awareness, phonemic awareness, syntactic processing, and working memory skill in hyperlexic children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(4), 359–386.
    • Svensson, Idor, Lundberg, Ingvar, & Jacobson, Christer. (2003). The nature of reading difficulties among inmates in juvenile institutions. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(7), 667–691.
    • Tractenberg, Rochelle E. (2001). Exploring a new silent test of phonological awareness. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 195–228.
    • van der Leij, Aryan, Bekebrede, Judith, & Kotterink, Mieke. (2010). Acquiring reading and vocabulary in Dutch and English: The effect of concurrent instruction. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9207-5
  • Olson, R. K., Gillis, J. J., Rack, J. P., DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1991). Confirmatory factor analysis of word recognition and process measures in the Colorado Reading Project. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal, 3, 235–248. Cited by3
    • Boada, Richard, Willcutt, Erik G., Tunick, Rachel A., Chhabildas, Nomita A., Olson, Richard K., DeFries, John C., & Pennington, Bruce F. (2002). A twin study of the etiology of high reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 683–707.
    • Ho, Connie Suk-Han, Law, Teresa Pui-Sze, & Ng, Penny Man. (2000). The phonological deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008040922662
    • Petrill, Stephen A., Deater-Deckard, Kirby, Thompson, Lee Ann, Schatschneider, Chris, Dethorne, Laura S., & Vendenbergh, David J. (2007). Longitudinal genetic analysis of early reading: The Western Reserve Reading Project [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9021-2
  • Olson, Richard K., Keenan, Janice M., Byrne, Brian, & Samuelsson, Stefan. (2017). Genetic and environmental influences on the development of reading and related skills. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 33–53). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Olson, Richard K., Keenan, Janice M., Byrne, Brian, & Samuelsson, Stefan. (2019). Etiology of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 391–412). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.018
  • Olson, R. K., Kliegl, R., & Davidson, B. J. (1983). Dyslexic and normal readers' eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 816–825. Cited by5
    • Olson, Richard K. (2006). Genetics?? and environmental influences on the development of reading and related cognitive skills. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 693–707). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Olson, Richard, & Datta, Helen. (2002). Visual-temporal processing in reading-disabled and normal twins [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 127–149.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Olson, R. K., Kliegl, R., Davidson, B., & Foltz, G. (1985). Individual and developmental differences in reading disability. In G. E. MacKinnon & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Volume 4. Advances in theory and practice (pp. 1–64). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Cited by24
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, Share, David, & Mansour, Maysaloon Said. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(5), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024237415143
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, & Siegel, Linda S. (2003). Reading skills in three orthographies: The case of trilingual Arabic-Hebrew-English-speaking Arab children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(7), 611–634.
    • Booth, James R., Perfetti, Charles A., MacWhinney, Brian, & Hunt, Sean B. (2000). The association of rapid temporal perception with orthographic and phonological processing in children and adults with reading impairment. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 101–132.
    • Bowers, Patricia G., & Newby-Clark, Elissa. (2002). The role of naming speed within a model of reading acquisition [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 109–126.
    • Cook, Vivian. (2004). The English writing system. (The English Language series). London Hodder Arnold. [2014, reprinted, London: New York: Routledge]
    • Duncan, Lynne G., & Johnson, Rhona S. (1999). How does phonological awareness relate to nonword reading skill amongst poor readers? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 405–439.
    • Gottardo, Alexandra, Chiappe, Penny, Siegel, Linda S., & Stanovich, Keith E. (1999). Patterns of word and nonword processing in skilled and less-skilled readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 465–487.
    • Hagiliassis, Nick, Pratt, Chris, & Johnston, Michael. (2006). Orthographic and phonological processes in reading. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4123-9
    • Ho, Connie Suk-Han, Law, Teresa Pui-Sze, & Ng, Penny Man. (2000). The phonological deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008040922662
    • Lyster, Solveig-Alma Halaas. (2002). The effects of morphological versus phonological awareness training in kindergarten on reading development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 261–294. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015272516220
    • Olson, Richard K. (2006). Genetics?? and environmental influences on the development of reading and related cognitive skills. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 693–707). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Olson, Richard K. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on word-reading skills. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 233–253). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Olson, Richard, & Datta, Helen. (2002). Visual-temporal processing in reading-disabled and normal twins [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 127–149.
    • Olson, Richard K., Keenan, Janice M., Byrne, Brian, & Samuelsson, Stefan. (2019). Etiology of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 391–412). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.018
    • Samuelsson, Stefan, Finnström, Orvar, Leijon, Ingemar, & Mård, Selina. (2000). Phonological and surface profiles of reading difficulties among very low birth weight children: Converging evidence for the developmental lag hypothesis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(3), 197–217.
    • Samuelsson, Stefan, Gustavsson, Ann, Herkner, Birgitta, & Lundberg, Ingvar. (2000). Is the frequency of dyslexic problems among prison inmates higher than in a normal population? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 297–312.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Share, David L., & Shalev, Carmit. (2004). Self-teaching in normal and disabled readers [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 769–800.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Sun-Alperin, M. Kendra, & Wang, Min. (2011). Cross-language transfer of phonological and orthographic processing skills from Spanish L1 to English L2. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9221-7
    • Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Geva, Esther. (2000). Processing novel phonemic contrasts in the acquisition of L2 word reading [Special issue: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends, edited by Esther Geva & Ludo Verhoeven]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0404_3
    • Yamashita, Junko. (2018). Orthographic and phonological processing in L2-English word recognition: Longitudinal observations from Grade 9 to 11 in EFL learners in Japan. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 267–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Olson, R., Wise, B., Connors, F., Rack, J., & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disability, 22(6), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948902200604 Cited by31
    • Boada, Richard, Willcutt, Erik G., Tunick, Rachel A., Chhabildas, Nomita A., Olson, Richard K., DeFries, John C., & Pennington, Bruce F. (2002). A twin study of the etiology of high reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 683–707.
    • Bråten, Ivar, Lie, Alfred, Andreassen, Rune, & Olaussen, Bodil S. (1999). Leisure time reading and orthographic processes in word recognition among Norwegian third- and fourth-grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(1), 65–88.
    • Byrne, Brian, Samuelsson, Stefan, Wadsworth, Sally, Hulslander, Jacqueline, Corley, Robin, DeFries, John C., Quain, Peter, Willcutt, Erik G., & Olson, Richard K. (2007). Longitudinal twin study of early literacy development: Preschool through Grade 1 [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9019-9
    • Carver, Ronald P. (1998). Predicting reading level in grades 1 to 6 from listening level and decoding level: Testing theory relevant to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 121–154.
    • Chiappe, Penny, Stringer, Ron, Siegel, Linda S., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2002). Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 73–107.
    • Chik, Pakey Pui-man, Ho, Connie Suk-han, Yeung, Pui-sze, Chan, David Wai-ock, Chung, Kevin Kien-hoa, Luan, Hui, Lo, Lap-yan, & Lau, Wendy Suet-yee. (2012). Syntactic skills in sentence reading comprehension among Chinese elementary school children. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 679–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9293-4
    • Cunningham, Anne E., Perry, Kathryn E., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011100226798
    • Duncan, Lynne G., & Johnson, Rhona S. (1999). How does phonological awareness relate to nonword reading skill amongst poor readers? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 405–439.
    • Gottardo, Alexandra, Chiappe, Penny, Siegel, Linda S., & Stanovich, Keith E. (1999). Patterns of word and nonword processing in skilled and less-skilled readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 465–487.
    • Hagtvet, Bente E. (2003). Listening comprehension and reading comprehension in poor decoders: Evidence for the importance of syntactic and semantic skills as well as phonological skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(6), 505–539.
    • Ho, Connie Suk-Han, Law, Teresa Pui-Sze, & Ng, Penny Man. (2000). The phonological deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008040922662
    • Hoeft, Fumiko, & Wang, Cheng. (2019). Intergenerational transmission in developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 413–438). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.019
    • Lewis, Barbara A., Freebairn, Lisa A., & Taylor, H. Gerry. (2002). Correlates of spelling abilities in children with early speech sound disorders. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 389–407.
    • López, Mercedes Rodrigo, & González, Juan E. Jiménez. (2000). IQ vs phonological recoding skill in explaining differences between poor readers and normal readers in word recognition: Evidence from a naming task. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 129–142.
    • Marinelli, Chiara Valeria, Angelelli, Paola, Notarnicola, Alessandra, & Luzzatti, Claudio. (2009). Do Italian dyslexic children use the lexical reading route efficiently? An orthographic judgment task. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9118-x
    • Morfidi, Eleni, van der Leij, Aryan, de Jong, Peter F., Scheltinga, Femke, & Bekebrede, Judith. (2007). Reading in two orthographies: A cross-linguistic study of Dutch average and poor readers who learn English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 753–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9035-9
    • Muter, Valerie, & Snowling, Margaret. (1997). Grammar and phonology predict spelling in middle childhood [Special issue: Spelling, editied by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 407–425.
    • Olson, Richard K. (2006). Genetics?? and environmental influences on the development of reading and related cognitive skills. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 693–707). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Olson, Richard K. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on word-reading skills. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 233–253). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Olson, Richard K., Keenan, Janice M., Byrne, Brian, & Samuelsson, Stefan. (2017). Genetic and environmental influences on the development of reading and related skills. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 33–53). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Olson, Richard K., Keenan, Janice M., Byrne, Brian, & Samuelsson, Stefan. (2019). Etiology of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 391–412). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.018
    • Piasta, Shayne B., & Wagner, Richard K. (2008). Dyslexia: Identification and classification. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 309–326). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rahbari, Noriyeh, Sénéchal, Monique, & Arab-Moghaddam, Narges. (2007). The role of orthographic and phonological processing skills in the reading and spelling of monolingual Persian children. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9042-x
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Reid, Agnieszka A. (2006). Developmental dyslexia: Evidence from Polish. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 249–274). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Samuelsson, Stefan, Gustavsson, Ann, Herkner, Birgitta, & Lundberg, Ingvar. (2000). Is the frequency of dyslexic problems among prison inmates higher than in a normal population? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 297–312.
    • Scheerer-Neumann, Gerheid. (1996b). Störungen des Erwerbs der Schriftlichkeit bei alphabetischen Schriftsystemen [Disorders in written language acquisition]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1329–1351). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Tractenberg, Rochelle E. (2001). Exploring a new silent test of phonological awareness. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 195–228.
    • Wolf, Maryanne, O'Rourke, Alyssa Goldberg, Gidney, Calvin, Lovett, Maureen, Cirino, Paul, & Morris, Robin. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013816320290
  • Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Conners, F. A., & Rack, J. P. (1990). Organisation, heritability, and remediation of component word recognition and language skills in disabled readers. In T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 261–322). New York: Academic Press. Cited by8
    • Duncan, Lynne G., & Johnson, Rhona S. (1999). How does phonological awareness relate to nonword reading skill amongst poor readers? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 405–439.
    • Gottardo, Alexandra, Chiappe, Penny, Siegel, Linda S., & Stanovich, Keith E. (1999). Patterns of word and nonword processing in skilled and less-skilled readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 465–487.
    • Lyster, Solveig-Alma Halaas. (2002). The effects of morphological versus phonological awareness training in kindergarten on reading development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 261–294. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015272516220
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Sprugevica, Ieva, & Høien, Torleiv. (2003). Enabling skills in early reading acquisition: A study of children in Latvian kindergartens. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 159–177.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Thompson, G. Brian, & Johnston, Rhona S. (2000). Are nonword and other phonological deficits indicative of a failed reading process? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 63–97.
    • Tractenberg, Rochelle E. (2001). Exploring a new silent test of phonological awareness. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 195–228.
  • Olson, R. K., Wise, B. W., Johnson, M. C., & Ring, J. (1997). The etiology and remediation of phonologically based word recognition and spelling disabilities: Are phonological deficits the ‘hole’ story? In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 305–326). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by7
    • Cao, Fan. (2018). Brain mechanisms of Chinese word reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 137–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Frost, Jørgen. (2001a). Phonemic awareness, spontaneous writing, and reading and spelling development from a preventive perspective. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 487–513.
    • Royer, James M., & Walles, Rena. (2008). Fluency training as an alternative intervention for reading-disabled and poor readers. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 327–353). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Sprugevica, Ieva, Paunina, Ingrida, & Høien, Torleiv. (2006). Early phonological skill as a predictor of reading acquisition in Latvian. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 291–301). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Thompson, G. Brian, & Johnston, Rhona S. (2000). Are nonword and other phonological deficits indicative of a failed reading process? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 63–97.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling [Special issue: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends, edited by Esther Geva & Ludo Verhoeven]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0404_4
  • Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Ring, J., & Johnson, M. (1997). Computer-based remedial training in phoneme awareness and phonological decoding: Effects on the post-training development of word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 235–253. Cited by7
    • Jacobson, Christer, & Lundberg, Ingvar. (2000). Early prediction of individual growth in reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 273–296.
    • McCutchen, Deborah, Green, Laura, Abbott, Robert D., & Sanders, Elizabeth A. (2009). Further evidence for teacher knowledge: Supporting struggling readers in grades three through five [Special issue: Perspectives on teachers' disciplinary knowledge of reading processes, development, and pedagogy, edited by Anne Cunningham & Jamie Zibulsky]. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9163-0
    • Olson, Richard K. (2006). Genetics?? and environmental influences on the development of reading and related cognitive skills. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 693–707). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Samuelsson, Stefan, Finnström, Orvar, Leijon, Ingemar, & Mård, Selina. (2000). Phonological and surface profiles of reading difficulties among very low birth weight children: Converging evidence for the developmental lag hypothesis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(3), 197–217.
    • Share, David L., & Shalev, Carmit. (2004). Self-teaching in normal and disabled readers [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 769–800.
    • Thompson, G. Brian, & Johnston, Rhona S. (2000). Are nonword and other phonological deficits indicative of a failed reading process? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 63–97.
    • Wesseling, Ralph, & Reitsma, Pieter. (2000). The transient role of explicit phonological recoding for reading acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 313–336.
  • O'Neil, Wayne. (1972). Our collective phonological illusions: Young and old. In James F. Kavanagh & Ignatius G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 111–116). Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press. Cited by3
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Smith, Philip T., & Pattison, Helen M. (1980). English shorthand systems and abbreviatory conventions: A psychological perspective. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 25–41). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Tauli, Valter. (1977). Speech and spelling. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 17–35). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
  • O'Neill, Timothy Michael. (2016). Ideography and Chinese language theory: A history (Welten Ostasiens - Worlds of East Asia - Mondes de l'Extrême Orient 26). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Öney, B., & Durgunoğlu, A. (1997). Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640000984X Cited by28
    • Abu Ahmad, Hanadi, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Share, David L. (2014). Cognitive predictors of early reading ability in Arabic: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to grade 2. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 171–194). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Alcock, Katie J. (2006). Literacy in Kiswahili. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 405–419). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Alcock, Katherine J., & Ngorosho, Damaris. (2003). Learning to spell a regularly spelled language is not a trivial task - Patterns of errors in Kiswahili. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(7), 635–666.
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Babayiğit, Selma, & Stainthorp, Rhona. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y
    • Brunswick, Nicola. (2010). Unimpaired reading development and dyslexia across different languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 131–154). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Candan, Ecehan, Babür, Nalan, Haznedar, Belma, & Erçetin , Gülcan. (2020). Reading and spelling skills in transparent orthographies: Phonological encoding and rapid automatized naming in Turkish. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 185–201). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_12
    • Caravolas, Marketa. (2006). Learning to spell in different languages: How orthographic variables might affect early literacy. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 497–511). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan. (2006). How language characteristics influence Turkish literacy development. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 219–229). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesa. (2017). Learning to read Turkish. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 437–454). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan, & Öney, Banu. (1999). A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 281–299.
    • Ellis, Nick C., Miwa, Natsume, Stavropoulou, Katerina, Hoxhallari, Lorenc, Van Daal, Victor H.P., Polyzoe, Nicoletta, Tsipa, Maria-Louisa, & Petalas, Michalis. (2004). The effects of orthographic depth on learning to read alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic scripts. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 438–468. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.4.5
    • Foulin, Jean Noel. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2
    • Georgiou, George K, Torppa, Minna, Manolitsis, George, Lyytinen, Heikki, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of reading and spelling across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9271-x
    • Hanley, J. Richard. (2010). Differences in reading ability between children attending Welsh- and English-speaking primary schools in Wales. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 87–107). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Kerek, Eugenia, & Niemi, Pekka. (2012). Grain-size units of phonological awareness among Russian first graders. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1), 80–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.05ker
    • Kim, Young-Suk. (2009b). The foundation of literacy skills in Korean: The relationship between letter-name knowledge and phonological awareness and their relative contribution to literacy skills. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 907–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9131-0
    • Kim, Young-Suk, & Pallante, Daniel. (2012). Predictors of reading skills for kindergartners and first grade students in Spanish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9244-0
    • Lau, Lily H.-S., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2005). Phonological awareness and spelling skill development in bilingual biscriptal children. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (357–371). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • McDougall, Siné, Brunswick, Nicola, & de Mornay Davies, Paul. (2010). Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies: An introduction and overview. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 3–21). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Öney, Banu, & Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan. (2005). Research and theory informing instruction in adult literacy. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 127–147). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Raman, Ilhan, & Baluch, Bahman. (2001). Semantic effects as a function of reading skill in word naming of a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 599–614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1012004729180
    • Rickard Liow, Susan J., & Lee, Lay Choo. (2004). Metalinguistic awareness and semi-syllabic scripts: Children's spelling errors in Malay [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 7–26.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2013). A tale of one letter: Morphological processing in early Arabic spelling. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.857586
    • Schroeder, Christoph. (2020). The advanced acquisition of orthography in heritage Turkish in Germany [Special issue: Literacies in contact, edited by Constanze Weth & Manuela Böhm, in collaboration Daniel Bunčić]. Written Language & Literacy, 23(2), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00043.sch
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Winskel, Heather, & Iemwanthong, Kanyarat. (2010). Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1021–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9194-6
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Öney, Banu, & Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan. (2005). Research and theory informing instruction in adult literacy. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 127–147). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Öney, B., & Goldman, S. R. (1984). Decoding and comprehension skills in Turkish and English: Effects of the regularity of grapheme-phoneme correspondences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‑0663.76.4.557 Cited by12
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Baluch, Bahman. (2006). Perian orthography and its relation to literacy. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 365–376). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Caravolas, Marketa. (2006). Learning to spell in different languages: How orthographic variables might affect early literacy. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 497–511). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan. (2006). How language characteristics influence Turkish literacy development. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 219–229). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan, & Öney, Banu. (1999). A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 281–299.
    • Landerl, Karin. (2006). Reading acquisition in different orthographies: Evidence from direct comparisons. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 513–530). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Lee, Shin-Ping, Uttal, David H., & Chen, Chuansheng. (1995). Writing systems and acquisition of reading in American, Chinese and Japanese first-graders. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 247–263). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Leikin, Mark, Schwartz, Mila, & Share, David L. (2010). General and specific benefits of bi-literate bilingualism: A Russian–Hebrew study of beginning literacy [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9210-x
    • McClung, Nicola A., & Pearson, P. David. (2019). Reading comprehension across languages: Seven European orthographies and two international literacy assessments. Written Language & Literacy, 22(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00019.mcc
    • Öney, Banu, & Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan. (2005). Research and theory informing instruction in adult literacy. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 127–147). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Öney, Banu, Peter, Mira, & Katz, Leonard. (1997). Phonological processing in printed word recognition: Effects of age and writing system. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0101_4 Cited by7
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Baluch, Bahman. (2006). Perian orthography and its relation to literacy. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 365–376). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Durgunoğlu, Aydin Yücesan, & Öney, Banu. (1999). A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 281–299.
    • Katz, Leonard, & Frost, Stephen J. (2001). Phonology constrains the internal orthographic representation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 297–332.
    • Nakamoto, Jonathan, Lindsey, Kim A., & Manis, Franklin R. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of English language learners' word decoding and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 20(7), 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9045-7
    • Rao, Chaitra, Vaid, Jyotsna, Srinivasan, Narayanan, & Chen, Hsin-Chin. (2011). Orthographic characteristics speed Hindi word naming but slow Urdu naming: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu biliterates [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9256-9
    • Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Geva, Esther. (2000). Processing novel phonemic contrasts in the acquisition of L2 word reading [Special issue: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends, edited by Esther Geva & Ludo Verhoeven]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0404_3
  • Ong, W. J. (1958). Ramus, method and the decay of dialogue: From the art of discourse to the art of reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cited by7
    • Bolter, Jay David. (1991). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [2001, Second edition]
    • Goody, Jack. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind (Themes in the Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goody, Jack. (1987). The interface between the written and oral (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Graff, Harvey J. (1987a). The labyrinths of literacy: Reflections on literacy past and present. London: The Falmer Press. [1995, Revised and expanded edition, (Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture), Pittsburgh, PA; London: University of Pittsburgh Press]
    • McLuhan, Marshall. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto; Buffalo; London: University of Toronto Press.
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
    • Scribner, Sylvia, & Cole, Michael. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
  • Ong, W. J. (1967). The presence of the word. New Haven; London: Yale University Press. Cited by13
    • Boone, Elizabeth Hill. (1994a). Introduction: Writing and recorded knowledge. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 3–26). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Brockmeier, Jens, & Olson, David R. (2009). The literacy episteme: From Innis to Derrida. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 3–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Brokaw, Galen. (2010). Indigenous American polygraphy and the dialogic model of media [Special issue: Graphic pluralism: Native American systems of inscription and the colonial situation, edited by Frank Salomon & Sabine Hyland]. Ethnohistory, 57(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-2009-056
    • Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. (2011). Divine art, infernal machine: The reception of printing in the West from first impressions to the sense of an ending (Material Texts). Philadelphia, PE; Oxford: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Geier, Manfred. (1994a). Schriftlichkeit und Philosophie [Writing and philosophy]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 646–654). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Graff, Harvey J. (1987a). The labyrinths of literacy: Reflections on literacy past and present. London: The Falmer Press. [1995, Revised and expanded edition, (Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture), Pittsburgh, PA; London: University of Pittsburgh Press]
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R., & Torrance, Nancy. (2009). Preface. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. xiii-xxi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
    • Ong, Walter J. (1992). Writing is a technology that restructures thought. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 293–319). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Presutti, Stefano. (2021a). The interdependence between speech and writing. Towards a greater awareness. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 83–101). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-prea
    • Smith, Larry E., & Long, Jesse R. (2000). Literacy, writing systems, and development in the Pacific [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj. B. Kachu]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 169–179.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Ong, Walter J. (1967). Interfaces of the word: Studies in the evolution of consciousness and culture. Ithaca, NY; London: Cornell University Press. Cited by9
    • Brokaw, Galen. (2010). Indigenous American polygraphy and the dialogic model of media [Special issue: Graphic pluralism: Native American systems of inscription and the colonial situation, edited by Frank Salomon & Sabine Hyland]. Ethnohistory, 57(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-2009-056
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Fichtner, Bernd. (1986). Wie lernen Kinder lesen und schreiben? - Aspekte einer pädagogischen Fragestellung [How do children learn to read and to write? - Aspects of a pedagogical problem]. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 444–462). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Graff, Harvey J. (1987a). The labyrinths of literacy: Reflections on literacy past and present. London: The Falmer Press. [1995, Revised and expanded edition, (Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture), Pittsburgh, PA; London: University of Pittsburgh Press]
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
    • Smith, Larry E., & Long, Jesse R. (2000). Literacy, writing systems, and development in the Pacific [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj. B. Kachu]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 169–179.
  • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge] Cited by94
    • Antos, Gerd. (1996). Die Produktion schriftlicher Texte [The production of written texts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1527–1535). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Ashworth, Evan. (2013). Language and ideologies and orthographies: Developing a writing system for Than Ówîngeh. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New Mexico.
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Baroni, Antonio. (2011). Alphabetic vs. non-alphabetic writing: Linguistic fit and natural tendencies. Rivista di Linguistica [Italian Journal of Linguistics], 23(2), 127–159.
    • Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [2007, Second edition]
    • Bäuml, Franz H. (1998). [Book review: Joyce Coleman, (1996), Public reading and the reading public in late medieval England and France]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 264–269.
    • Bennet, John. (2013). Epilogue. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 335–342). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.q
    • Berman, Ruth A. (2016). Linguistic literacy and later language development. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 181–200). Cham: Springer.
    • Berman, Ruth A., & Nir, Bracha. (2010). The lexicon in writing-speech-differentiation: Developmental perspectives [Special issue: Developmental aspects of written language, edited by Sofía A. Vernon & Mónica Alvarado]. Written Language & Literacy, 13(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.2.01ber
    • Bhatt, Prath M. (1988). Graphic systems, phonic systems, and linguistic representations. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 106–120). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Boffey, Julia. (2012). Manuscript and print in London c.1475–1530. London: The British Library.
    • Bolter, Jay David. (1991). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [2001, Second edition]
    • Boone, Elizabeth Hill. (1994a). Introduction: Writing and recorded knowledge. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 3–26). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
    • Brockmeier, Jens, & Olson, David R. (2009). The literacy episteme: From Innis to Derrida. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 3–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Brokaw, Galen. (2010). Indigenous American polygraphy and the dialogic model of media [Special issue: Graphic pluralism: Native American systems of inscription and the colonial situation, edited by Frank Salomon & Sabine Hyland]. Ethnohistory, 57(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-2009-056
    • Condorelli, Marco (Ed.). (2020). Advances in historical orthography, c. 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674171
    • Cook, Vivian. (2004). The English writing system. (The English Language series). London Hodder Arnold. [2014, reprinted, London: New York: Routledge]
    • Cook-Gumperz, Jenny (Ed.). (2006). The social construction of literacy (Second edition) (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [1986, First edition]
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2016). Sociolinguistics and the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 261–274). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2019). „Die Buchstabenschrift ist an und für sich die intelligentere.‟ Überlegungen zur Bewertung von Schriftsystemen. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st Century: Brest, June 13-15, 2018, Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 1–16). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-coul
    • Danesi, Marcel. (2017). The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet (Bloomsbury Advances in Semiotics). London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Davidson, Andrew. (2019). Writing: The re-construction of language. Language Sciences, 72, 134–149. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.09.004
    • Dobson, Teresa M., & Willinsky, John. (2009). Digital literacy. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 286–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Elti di Rodeano, Sveva. (2021). Scripts in contact: Transmission of the first alphabets. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 223–239). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-rode
    • Englehardt, Joshua (Ed.). (2012). Agency in ancient writing. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
    • Erfurt, Jürgen. (1996). Sprachwandel und Schriftlichkeit [Language change and writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1387–1404). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Gauger, Hans-Martin. (1994). Geschichte des Lesens [The history of reading]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 65–84). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1984). A history of writing. London: British Library. [1987, Second edition; 1992, Third revised edition, London: British Library; New York: Abbeville Press]
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Geier, Manfred. (1994a). Schriftlichkeit und Philosophie [Writing and philosophy]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 646–654). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Goody, Jack. (1987). The interface between the written and oral (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Graff, Harvey J. (1987a). The labyrinths of literacy: Reflections on literacy past and present. London: The Falmer Press. [1995, Revised and expanded edition, (Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture), Pittsburgh, PA; London: University of Pittsburgh Press]
    • Hannas, William C. (2003). The writing on the wall: How Asian orthography curbs creativity (Encounters with Asia). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Harris, Roy. (2000). Rethinking writing. London; New York: Continuum.
    • Hornberger, Nancy H. (1994). Oral and literate cultures. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 424–431). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Houston, Stephen. (1994). Literacy among the Pre-Columbian Maya: A comparative perspective. In Elizabeth H. Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 27–49). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (2008). The small deaths of Maya writing. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 231–252). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Houston, Stephen, Baines, John, & Cooper, Jerrold. (2003). Last writing: Script obsolescence in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Mesoamerica. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45(3), 430–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417503000227
    • Jackson, Sarah E. (2013). Writing as material technology: Orientation within landscapes of the classic Maya world. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 45–63). London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.c
    • Johnson, William A. (2009a). Introduction. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 3–10). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. (2016). Track changes: A literary history of word processing. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
    • Koch, Peter, & Oesterreicher, Wulf. (1994). Schriftlichkeit und Sprache [Writing and language]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 587–604). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Kolinsky, Régine. (2015). How learning to read influences language and cognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 377–393). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Kress, Gunther. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London; New York: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203164754
    • Kurvers, Jeanne. (2015). Emerging literacy in adult second-language learners: A synthesis of research findings in the Netherlands [Special issue: Adolescents and adults who develop literacy for the first time in L2, edited by Martha Young-Scholten]. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.943149
    • Lillis, Theresa. (2013). The sociolinguistics of writing (Edinburgh Sociolinguistics). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    • Linell, Per. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations (Routledge Advances in Communication and Linguistic Theory). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Lyons, Martyn, & Marquilhas, Rita (Eds.). (2017). Approaches to the history of written culture: A world inscribed (New Directions in Book History). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54136-5
    • Mignolo, Walter D. (1994a). Signs and their transmission: The question of the book in the New World. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 220–270). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Mikulska, Katarzyna. (2019b). The system of graphic communication in the Central Mexican divinatory codices from the functional perspective [translation by Jerome A. Offner]. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 41–92). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c002
    • Miller, Robert D., II. (2015). The performance of oral tradition in Ancient Israel. In Brian B. Schmidt (Ed.), Contextualizing Israel's sacred writing: Ancient literacy, orality, and literary production (Ancient Israel and Its Literature 22) (pp. 175–196). Atlanta, GA: SBL Press.
    • Morales, Antonio J. (2016). From voice to papyrus to wall: Verschriftung and Verschriftlichung in the Old Kingdom Pyramid texts. In Markus Hilgert (Ed.), Understanding material text cultures: A multidisciplinary view (Materiale Textkulturen 9) (pp. 69–130). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515_9783110417845-004
    • Mullaney, Thomas S. (2017). The Chinese typewriter: A history. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Olson, David R. (1988). Mind, media, and memory: The archival and epistemic functions of written text. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 422–441). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2009b). Literacy, literacy policy, and the school. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 566–576). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R., & Oatley, Keith. (2014). The quotation theory of writing. Written Communication, 31(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515164
    • Ong, Walter J. (1992). Writing is a technology that restructures thought. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 293–319). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Presutti, Stefano. (2021a). The interdependence between speech and writing. Towards a greater awareness. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 83–101). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-prea
    • Raible, Wolfgang. (1994). Orality and literacy. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 1–17). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Rappaport, Joanne. (1994). Object and alphabet: Andean Indians and documents in the colonial period. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 271–292). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Schaper, Joachim. (2015). Hebrew culture at the “interface between the written and the oral”. In Brian B. Schmidt (Ed.), Contextualizing Israel's sacred writing: Ancient literacy, orality, and literary production (Ancient Israel and Its Literature 22) (pp. 323–340). Atlanta, GA: SBL Press.
    • Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. (1992). Before writing [Two volumes: Volume 1. From counting to cuneiform; Volume 2. A catalog of near eastern tokens]. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    • Schmandt-Besserat, Denise, & Moghimi, Niloufar. (2017). Making tokens talk. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 175–183). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Senner, Wayne M. (1989). Theories and myths on the origins of writing: A historical overview. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 1–26). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    • Shanya, Michal, Geva, Esther, & Melech-Feder, Liat. (2010). Emergent literacy in children of immigrants coming from a primarily oral literacy culture. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 24–60. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.02sha
    • Smalley, William, Chia Koua Vang, & Gnia Yee Yang. (1990). Mother of writing: The origin and development of a Hmong messianic script. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
    • Smith, Frank. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [1978, second edition; 1982, third edition; 1988, fourth edition; 1994, fifth edition; 2004, sixth edition, Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Smith, Larry E., & Long, Jesse R. (2000). Literacy, writing systems, and development in the Pacific [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj. B. Kachu]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 169–179.
    • Snow, Catherine E., & Uccelli, Paola. (2009). The challenge of academic language. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 112–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sridhar, Kamal K., & Kachru, Yamuna. (2000). Literacy, minority languages, and multilingual India [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj. B. Kachu]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 149–165.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Stine, Philip C. (1994). Writing and religion. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 604–610). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Street, Brian V., & Lefstein, Adam. (2007). Literacy: An advanced resource book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Szoblik, Katarzyna. (2019). Traces of orality in the Codex Xolotl. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 204–229). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c007
    • Themistocleous, Christiana. (2010). Writing in a non-standard Greek variety: Romanized Cypriot Greek in online chat. Writing Systems Research, 2(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq008
    • Throop, Liz C. (2004). Thinking on paper: Hindu-Arabic numerals in European typography. Visible Language, 38(3), 290–303.
    • van den Hout, Theo. (2020). A history of Hittite literacy: Writing and reading in Late Bronze-Age Anatolia (1650–1200 BC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860161
    • Vierke, Clarissa. (2014). Akhi patia kalamu: Writing Swahili poetry in Arabic script. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 319–339). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Viollet, Catherine. (1994). Schriftlichkeit und Literatur [Writing and literature]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 658–672). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Waal, Willemijn. (2018). On the “Phoenician letters”: The case for an early transmission of the Greek alphabet from an archaeological, epigraphic and linguistic perspective. Aegean Studies, 1, 83–125.
    • Walters, Keith. (1994). Writing and education. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 638–645). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Werner, Shirley. (2009). Literacy studies in classics: The last twenty years. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 333–382). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Woolf, Greg. (2009). Literacy or literacies in Rome? In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 46–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Woolf, Greg (2015). Ancient illiteracy? Ancient literacies: Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 58(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.2015.12010.x
  • Ong, Walter J. (1986a). Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino. [1982, First edition, Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge] Cited by1
    • Baroni, Antonio. (2011). Alphabetic vs. non-alphabetic writing: Linguistic fit and natural tendencies. Rivista di Linguistica [Italian Journal of Linguistics], 23(2), 127–159.
  • Ong, W. J. (1986b). Writing is a technology that restructures thought. In G. Baumann (Ed.), The written word: Literacy in transition (pp. 23–50). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Cited by5
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Werner, Shirley. (2009). Literacy studies in classics: The last twenty years. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 333–382). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Weth, Constanze, Böhm, Manuela, & Bunčić, Daniel. (2020). Literacies in contact: Forms, functions, and practices [Special issue: Literacies in contact, edited by Constanze Weth & Manuela Böhm, in collaboration Daniel Bunčić]. Written Language & Literacy, 23(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00037.wet
  • Ong, Walter J. (1987). Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen. [1982, First edition, Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen; 1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge] Cited by8
    • Ahlzweig, Claus. (1994). Geschichte des Buches [The history of the book]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 85–102). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Antos, Gerd. (1996). Die Produktion schriftlicher Texte [The production of written texts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1527–1535). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Ehlich, Konrad. (1994). Funktion und Struktur schriftlicher Kommunikation [Function and structure of written communication]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 18–41). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Erfurt, Jürgen. (1996). Sprachwandel und Schriftlichkeit [Language change and writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1387–1404). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Geier, Manfred. (1994a). Schriftlichkeit und Philosophie [Writing and philosophy]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 646–654). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Ludwig, Otto. (1994). Geschichte des Schreibens [The history of writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 48–65). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Pospeschill, Markus. (1996). Schreiben mit dem Computer [Writing with a computer]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1068–1074). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Weitzel, Jürgen. (1994). Schriftlichkeit und Recht [Writing and law]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 610–619). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Ong, Walter J. (1992). Writing is a technology that restructures thought. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 293–319). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Cited by5
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Berman, Ruth A., & Ravid, Dorit. (2009). Becoming a literate language user: Oral and written text construction across adolescence. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 92–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Davidson, Andrew. (2019). Writing: The re-construction of language. Language Sciences, 72, 134–149. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.09.004
    • Pederson, Eric 2003). Mirror-image discrimination among nonliterate, monoliterate, and biliterate Tamil subjects. Written Language & Literacy, 6(1), 71–91.
    • Ravid, Dorit, & Chen-Djemal, Yehudit. (2015). Spoken and written narration in Hebrew: A case study. Written Language & Literacy, 18(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.03rav
  • Ong, Walter J. (2002). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (Second edition). London; New York: Routledge. [1982, First edition, Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen; 1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge] Cited by7
    • Berman, Ruth A., & Ravid, Dorit. (2009). Becoming a literate language user: Oral and written text construction across adolescence. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 92–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Hopkins, Jason. (2008). Choosing how to write sign language: A sociolinguistic perspective [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.036
    • Ravid, Dorit Diskin. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling (Literacy Studies 3). New York: Springer.
    • Schaper, Joachim. (2015). Hebrew culture at the “interface between the written and the oral”. In Brian B. Schmidt (Ed.), Contextualizing Israel's sacred writing: Ancient literacy, orality, and literary production (Ancient Israel and Its Literature 22) (pp. 323–340). Atlanta, GA: SBL Press.
    • Shockey, Nathan. (2019). The typographic imagination: Reading and writing in Japan's age of modern print media (Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute). New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Vierke, Clarissa. (2014). Akhi patia kalamu: Writing Swahili poetry in Arabic script. In Meikal Mumin & Kess Versteegh (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 71) (pp. 319–339). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Waal, Willemijn. (2018). On the “Phoenician letters”: The case for an early transmission of the Greek alphabet from an archaeological, epigraphic and linguistic perspective. Aegean Studies, 1, 83–125.
  • Ong, Walter J. (2012). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (30th anniversary edition, with additional chapters by John Hartley). London; New York: Routledge. [1982, First edition, Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen; 1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, (Second edition). London; New York: Routledge] Cited by5
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Mullaney, Thomas S. (2017). The Chinese typewriter: A history. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Onifer, W., & Swinney, D. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency, meaning, and contextual bias. Memory & Cognition, 9, 225–236. Cited by4
    • Frost, Ram. (1992). Orthography and phonology: The psychological reality of orthographic depth. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 255–274). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Keenan, Janice M., & Betjemann, Rebecca S. (2008a). Comprehension of single words: The role of semantics in word identification and reading disability. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 191–210). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Li, Ping, & Yip, Michael C. (1998). Context effects and the processing of spoken homophones [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 223–243. [Also pulished in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 69–89). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Seidenberg, Mark S., & McClelland, James L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
  • Oppenheim, A. L. (1959). On an operational device in Mesopotamian bureaucracy. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 18, 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1086/371519 Cited by10
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996c). The first civilization. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 21–32). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Goody, Jack. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Jasim, Sabah Abboud, & Oates, Joan. (1986). Early tokens and tablets in Mesopotamia: New information from Tell Abada and Tell Brak. World Archaeology, 17(3), 348–362.
    • Pettersson, John Sören. (1996b). Numerical notation. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 795–806). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sauer, Kristina, & Sürenhagen, Dietrich. (2016). Zählmarken, Zeichenträger und Siegelpraxis: Einige Bemerkungen zu vor- und frühschriftlichen Verwaltungshilfen in frühsumerischer Zeit. In Thomas E. Balke & Christina Tsouparopoulou (Eds.), Materiality of writing in early Mesopotamia (Materiale Textkulturen 13) (pp. 11–46). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. (1992). Before writing [Two volumes: Volume 1. From counting to cuneiform; Volume 2. A catalog of near eastern tokens]. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2010). Language, technology, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2017). A computational model of the discovery of writing. Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 194-226. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00004.spr
    • Sproat, Richard. (2018). [Book review: Peter T. Daniels, (2018), An exploration of writing]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(2), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00017.spr
  • Oppenheim, A. Leo. (1964). Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a dead civilisation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [1977, Revised second edition edited by Erica Reiner] Cited by12
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Goody, Jack. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind (Themes in the Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goody, Jack. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goody, Jack. (1987). The interface between the written and oral (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Lyons, Martyn, & Marquilhas, Rita (Eds.). (2017). Approaches to the history of written culture: A world inscribed (New Directions in Book History). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54136-5
    • Mignolo, Walter D. (1994a). Signs and their transmission: The question of the book in the New World. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 220–270). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
    • Pope, Maurice. (1975). The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphics to Linear B. London: Thames & Hudson: New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. [1999, Revised edition, The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphs to Maya script. London; New York: Thames & Hudson]
    • Sirat, Colette. (1988). The material conditions of the lateralization of the ductus. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 173–201). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Sirat, Colette. (1994). Handwriting and the writing hand. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 375–460). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Tsouparopoulou, Christina. (2016). Deconstructing textuality, reconstructing materiality. In Thomas E. Balke & Christina Tsouparopoulou (Eds.), Materiality of writing in early Mesopotamia (Materiale Textkulturen 13) (pp. 257–275). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • van den Hout, Theo. (2020). A history of Hittite literacy: Writing and reading in Late Bronze-Age Anatolia (1650–1200 BC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860161
  • Oppenheim, A. Leo. (1977). Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a dead civilisation (Revised second edition edited by Erica Reiner). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [1964, First edition] Cited by4
    • Brown, David. (2008). Increasingly redundant: The growing obsolescence of the cuneiform script in Babylonia from 539 BC. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 73–101). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Walker, C. B. F. (1987). Cuneiform (Reading the past 3). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press. [1989, Second edition; 1990, In J. T. Hooker (Ed.) Reading the past. Ancient writing from cuneiform to the alphabet (pp. 15–74). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press]
  • O'Regan, J. K. (1979a). Eye guidance in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 501–509. Cited by10
    • Albrengues, Claire, Lavigne, Frédéric, Aguilar, Carlos, Castet, Eric, & Vitu, Françoise. (2019). Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eyemovement control during reading. PLOS ONE, 14(7), e0219666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219666
    • Chen, Hsuan-Chih, & Tang, Chi-Kong. (1998). The effective visual field in reading Chinese [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 245–254. [Also pulished in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Heister, Julian, Würzner, Kay-Michael, & Kliegl, Reinhold. (2012). Analysing large datasets of eye movements during reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 102–130). London: Psychology Press.
    • Inhoff, Albrecht W., & Rayner, Keith. (1996). Das Blickverhalten beim Lesen [Eye movements during reading]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 942–957). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Minkoff, Scott R. B., & Raney, Gary E. (2000). Letter-detection errors in the word the: Word frequency versus syntactic structure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(1), 55–76.
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Tang, Chi-kong, Yeung, Lai-hung, Au, & Chen, Hsuan-Chih. (1997). The effective visual field in Chinese reading. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 267–286). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  • O'Regan, Kevin. (1979b). Moment to moment control of eye saccades as a function of textual parameters in reading. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 49–60). New York; London: Plenum Press. Cited by6
    • Beier, Sofie. (2012a). How my brain stopped reading. Visible Language, 46(3), 200–205.
    • Henderson, John M., & Ferreira, Fernanda. (1993). Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 201–221. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 73–93). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Levy-Schoen, Ariane, & O'Regan, Kevin. (1979). The control of eye movements in reading (tutorial paper). In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • McConkie, George W. (1979). On the role and control of eye movements in reading. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 37–48). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • McConkie, George W., & Zola, David. (1981). Language constraints and the functional stimulus in reading. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 155–175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Smith, Philip T., & Groat, Anne. (1979). Spelling patterns, letter cancellation and the processing of text. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 309–324). New York; London: Plenum Press.
  • O'Regan, J. K. (1980). The control of saccade size and fixation duration in reading: The limits of linguistic control. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 112–117. Cited by7
    • Albrengues, Claire, Lavigne, Frédéric, Aguilar, Carlos, Castet, Eric, & Vitu, Françoise. (2019). Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eyemovement control during reading. PLOS ONE, 14(7), e0219666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219666
    • Inhoff, Albrecht W., & Rayner, Keith. (1996). Das Blickverhalten beim Lesen [Eye movements during reading]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 942–957). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Minkoff, Scott R. B., & Raney, Gary E. (2000). Letter-detection errors in the word the: Word frequency versus syntactic structure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(1), 55–76.
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2015). The work of the eyes during reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 44–59). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • O'Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 395–453). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. Cited by14
    • Albrengues, Claire, Lavigne, Frédéric, Aguilar, Carlos, Castet, Eric, & Vitu, Françoise. (2019). Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eyemovement control during reading. PLOS ONE, 14(7), e0219666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219666
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Grainger, Jonathan. (1992). Orthographic neighborhoods and visual word recognition. In Ram Frost and Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 131–146). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Nazir, Tatjana A., & Huckauf, Anke. (2008). The visual skill “reading”. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 25–42). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Reingold, Eyal M., Sheridan, Heather, & Reichle, Erik D. (2015). Direct lexical and nonlexical control of fixation duration in reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 261–276). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Roschke, Kristy, & Radach, Ralph. (2016). Perception, reading, and digital media. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 33–52). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2015). The work of the eyes during reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 44–59). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Shillcock, Richard. (2007). Eye movements and visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Wang, Hui, He, Xuanzi, & Legge, Gordon E. (2014). Effect of pattern complexity on the visual span for Chinese and alphabet characters. Journal of Vision, 14(8):6, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.8.6.
    • White, Sarah J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.205
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • O'Regan, J. K., & Jacobs, A. M. (1992). The optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 185–197. Cited by5
    • Álvarez, Carlos J., Carreiras, Manuel, & Perea, Manuel. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000242 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 98–123). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Conrad, Markus, & Jacobs, Arthur M. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000224 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 44–64). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2015). The work of the eyes during reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 44–59). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Shillcock, Richard. (2007). Eye movements and visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • O'Regan, J. K., & Levy-Schoen, A. (1987). Eye movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance Xll: The psychology of reading (pp. 363–383). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by7
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Inhoff, Albrecht W., & Rayner, Keith. (1996). Das Blickverhalten beim Lesen [Eye movements during reading]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 942–957). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Li, Xingshan, Zang, Chuanli, Liversedge, Simon P., & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2015). The role of words in Chinese reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 232–244). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Reichle, Erik D., & Sheridan, Heather. (2015). E-Z reader: An overview of the model and two recent applications. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 277–290). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2012). Eye movements and word recognition during reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 73–101). London: Psychology Press.
    • Shillcock, Richard. (2007). Eye movements and visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • O'Regan, J. K., Lévy-Schoen, A., Pynte, J., & Brugaillère, B. É. (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 250–257. Cited by6
    • Inhoff, Albrecht W., & Rayner, Keith. (1996). Das Blickverhalten beim Lesen [Eye movements during reading]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 942–957). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, Schotter, Elizabeth R., Masson, Michael E. J., Potter, Mary C., & Treiman, Rebecca. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. doi10.1177/1529100615623267
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2015). The work of the eyes during reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 44–59). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Shillcock, Richard. (2007). Eye movements and visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Tang, Chi-kong, Yeung, Lai-hung, Au, & Chen, Hsuan-Chih. (1997). The effective visual field in Chinese reading. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 267–286). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  • Ormrod, J. E., & Jenkins, L. (1989). Study strategies for learning spelling: Correlations with achievement and developmental changes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 643–650. Cited by3
    • Bosman, Anna M. T., de Graaff, Saskia, & Gijsel, Martine A. R. (2006). Double Dutch: The Dutch spelling system and learning to spell in Dutch. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 135–150). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Hilte, Maartje, Bos, Mieke, & Reitsma, Pieter. (2005). Effects of spelling pronunciations during spelling practice in Dutch [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 137–153.
    • Holmes, Virginia M., & Malone, N. (2004). Adult spelling strategies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 537–566.
  • Orsatti, Paola. (2019). Persian language in Arabic script: The formation of the orthographic standard and the different graphic traditions of Iran in the first centuries of the Islamic era. In Dmitry Bondarev, Alessandro Gori, & Lameen Souag (Eds.), Creating standards: Interactions with Arabic script in 12 manuscript cultures (Studies in Manuscript Cultures 16) (pp. 39–72). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110639063-002
  • Orsolini, Margherita, Fanari, Rachele, Cerracchio, Sara, & Famiglietti, Luisa. (2009). Phonological and lexical reading in Italian children with dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 933–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9134-x Cited by2
    • Lee, Lay Wah, Low, Hui Min, & Mohamed, Abdul Rashid. (2012). Word count analysis of Malay language textbooks for the purpose of developing a Malay reading remedial programme [Special issue: Second language writing systems, edited by Benedetta Bassetti, Jyotsna Vaid, & Vivian Cook]. Writing Systems Research, 4(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.690713
    • Paizi, Despina, Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, & Burani, Cristina. (2011). Lexical stress assignment in Italian developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9236-0
  • Orsolini, M., Fanari, R., Tosi, V., De Nigris, B., & Carrieri, R. (2006). From phonological recoding to lexical reading: a longitudinal study on reading development in Italian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(5), 576–607. Cited by7
    • Angelelli, Paola, Marinelli, Chiara Valeria, & Zoccolotti, Pierluigi. (2010). Single or dual orthographic representations for reading and spelling? A study of Italian dyslexic-dysgraphic and normal children. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(4), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2010.543539
    • Barca, Laura, Ellis, Andrew W., & Burani, Cristina. (2007). Context-sensitive rules and word naming in Italian children. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9040-z
    • Brunswick, Nicola. (2010). Unimpaired reading development and dyslexia across different languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 131–154). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Burani, Cristina, Thornton, Anna M., & and Zoccolotti, Pierluigi. (2017). Learning to read Italian. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 211–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Davies, Robert A. I., & Cuetos, Fernando. (2010). Reading acquisition and dyslexia in Spanish. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 155–180). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Orsolini, Margherita, Fanari, Rachele, Cerracchio, Sara, & Famiglietti, Luisa. (2009). Phonological and lexical reading in Italian children with dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 933–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9134-x
    • Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, De Luca, Maria, Di Filippo, Gloria, Judica, Anna, & Martelli, Marialuisa. (2009). Reading development in an orthographically regular language: effects of length, frequency, lexicality and global processing ability. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1053–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9144-8
  • Orton, S. T. (1925). “Word-blindness” in school children. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 14, 581–615. Cited by5
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Gibson, Eleanor J., & Levin, Harry. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Perfetti, Charles, & Harris, Lindsay. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in English. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 25–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.002
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Liberman, Isabelle Y. (1972). Misreading: A search for causes. In James F. Kavanagh & Ignatius G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 293–317). Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Orton, S. T. (1937). Reading, writing and speech problems in children. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Cited by11
    • Cossu, Giuseppe. (1999b). Biological constraints on literacy acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 213–237.
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Gibson, Eleanor J., & Levin, Harry. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Gough, Philip B. (1972). One second of reading. In James F. Kavanagh & Ignatius G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 331–358). Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
    • Liberman, Alvin M. (1992). The relation of speech to reading and writing. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 167–178). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Marshall, C. (2000). [Book review: T. R. Miles & Elaine Miles, (1999), Dyslexia: A hundred years on (Second edition)]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 357–359.
    • Reid, Agnieszka A. (2006). Developmental dyslexia: Evidence from Polish. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 249–274). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Liberman, Isabelle Y. (1972). Misreading: A search for causes. In James F. Kavanagh & Ignatius G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 293–317). Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Treiman, Rebecca. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Osaka, N. (1987). Effect of peripheral visual field size upon eye movements during Japanese text processing. In J. K. O'Regan & A. Levy-Schoen (Eds.), Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 421–429). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Cited by5
    • Chen, Hsuan-Chih, & Tang, Chi-Kong. (1998). The effective visual field in reading Chinese [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 245–254. [Also pulished in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Kess, Joseph F. (2005). On the history, use, and structure of Japanese kanji. In Katsuo Tamaoka (Ed.), Corpus studies on Japanese kanji (Glottometrics 10) (pp. 1–15). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo; Lüdenschied, Germany: RAM-Verlag.
    • Kess, Joseph F., & Miyamoto, Tadao. (1999). The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Osaka, N. (1992). Size of saccade and fixation duration of eye movements during reading: Psychophysics of Japanese text processing. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 9, 5–13. Cited by9
    • Chen, Hsuan-Chih, & Tang, Chi-Kong. (1998). The effective visual field in reading Chinese [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 245–254. [Also pulished in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Evertz-Rittich, Martin. (2021). What is a written word? And if so, how many? In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 25–45). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-ever
    • Ferguson, Daniel, Kato, Yasuhiko, & Nagahiro, Mariko. (2012). Miscues and eye movements of Japanese beginner readers. In Ken Goodman, Shaomei Wang, Mieko Shimizu Iventosch, & Yetta Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 127–143). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Kess, Joseph F. (2005). On the history, use, and structure of Japanese kanji. In Katsuo Tamaoka (Ed.), Corpus studies on Japanese kanji (Glottometrics 10) (pp. 1–15). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo; Lüdenschied, Germany: RAM-Verlag.
    • Kess, Joseph F., & Miyamoto, Tadao. (1999). The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Leong, Che-Kan. (2002a). ‘Cognitive conjunction’ analysis of processing Chinese. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 1–31). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
    • Williams, Clay, & Bever, Thomas. (2010). Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias? Reading and Writing, 23(5), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9228-0
  • Osaka, N., & Oda, K. (1991). Effective visual field size necessary for vertical reading during Japanese text processing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 345–347. Cited by4
    • Cook, Vivian, & Bassetti, Benedetta. (2005). An introduction to researching second language writing systems. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 1–67). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Kess, Joseph F. (2005). On the history, use, and structure of Japanese kanji. In Katsuo Tamaoka (Ed.), Corpus studies on Japanese kanji (Glottometrics 10) (pp. 1–15). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo; Lüdenschied, Germany: RAM-Verlag.
    • Kess, Joseph F., & Miyamoto, Tadao. (1999). The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Pollatsek, Alexander, Raney, Gary E., Lagasse, Linda, & Rayner, Keith. (1993). The use of information below fixation in reading and in visual search. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 179–200. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 51–72). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
  • Osterkamp, Sven. (2012). Early adaptations of the Korean script to render foreign languages. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 83–102). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Osterkamp, Sven, & Schreiber, Gordian. (2021). Challenging the dichotomy between phonography and morphography: Transitions and gray areas. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 47–82). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-oste Cited by1
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2021). A modular theoretic approach to the Japanese writing system: Possibilities and challenges. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 621–643). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-hond
  • Otake, T., Hatano, G., Cutler, A., & Mehler, J. (1993). Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 258–278. Cited by5
    • Akita, Kiyomi, & Hatano, Giyoo. (1999). Learning to read and write in Japanese. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 214–234). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Kess, Joseph F., & Miyamoto, Tadao. (1999). The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Leong, Che-Kan. (2002c). Segmental analysis and reading in Chinese. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 227–245). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Mori, Yoshiko. (2012). Five myths about kanji and kanji learning. Japanese Language and Literature, 46, 143–169.
    • Vasanta, Duggirala. (2004). Processing phonological information in a semi-syllabic script: Developmental data from Telugu [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000013830.55257.3a
  • Ott, Michael R. (2019a). Culture in nature: Writing on wood. In Ricarda Wagner, Christine Neufeld, Ludger Lieb (Eds.), Writing beyond pen and parchment: Inscribed objects in medieval European literature (Materiale Textkulturen 30) (pp. 167–178). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515_9783110645446-008
  • Ott, Michael R. (2019b). Text-bearing warriors: Inscriptions on weapons. In Ricarda Wagner, Christine Neufeld, Ludger Lieb (Eds.), Writing beyond pen and parchment: Inscribed objects in medieval European literature (Materiale Textkulturen 30) (pp. 275–289). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515_9783110645446-015
  • Ottenheimer, Harriet Joseph. (2001). Spelling Shinzwani: Dictionary construction and orthographic choice in the Comoro Islands. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 15–29. Cited by2
    • Jones, Mari C., & Mooney, Damien (Eds.). (2017). Creating orthographies for endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316562949
    • Sebba, Mark. (2007). Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486739
  • Oudijk, Michel R. (2019). The aaking of academic myth. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 340–375). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c013
  • Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554 Cited by20
    • Cain, Kate, & Barnes, Marcia A. (2017). Reading comprehension: What develops and when? In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 257–281). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Cain, Kate, Compton, Donald L., & Parrila, Rauno K. (2017c). Introduction to reading comprehension. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 237–238). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Defior, Sylvia, & Serrano, Francisca. (2017). Learning to read Spanish. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 270-298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Dockrell, Julie E., & Connelly, Vincent. (2016). The relationships between oral and written sentence generation in English speaking children: The role of language and literacy skills. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 161–177). Cham: Springer.
    • Fricke, Silke, Szczerbinski, Marcin, Stackhouse, Joy, & Fox-Boyer, Annette V. (2008). Predicting individual differences in early literacy acquisition in German: The role of speech and language processing skills and letter knowledge [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 103–146. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.02fri
    • Ho, Connie Suk-Han, Wong, Yau-Kai, Yeung, Pui-Sze, Chan, David Wai-ock, Chung, Kevin Kien-Hoa, Lo, Sau-Ching, & Luan, Hui. (2012). The core components of reading instruction in Chinese. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 857–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9303-1
    • Jasińska, Kaja K., Frost, Stephen, Molfese, Peter, Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, Rueckl, Jay, & Pugh, Ken. (2016). Neuroimaging perspectives on skilled and impaired reading and the bilingual experience. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_3
    • Kieffer, Michael J., & Lesaux, Noneie K. (2012). Knowledge of words, knowledge about words: Dimensions of vocabulary in first and second language learners in sixth grade. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 347–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9272-9
    • Kim, Young-Suk Grace. (2020). Interactive dynamic literacy model: An integrative theoretical framework for reading-writing relations. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 11–34). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_2
    • Kruk, Richard S., & Bergman, Krista. (2013). The reciprocal relations between morphological processes and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 10–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.014
    • Linebarger, Deborah, Piotrowski, Jessica Taylor, & Greenwood, Charles R. (2010). On-screen print: The role of captions as a supplemental literacy tool. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01407.x
    • Oakhill, Jane V., Berenhaus, Molly S., & Cain, Kate. (2015). Children's reading comprehension and comprehension difficulties. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 344–360). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Oakhill, Jane, & Cain, Kate. (2017). Children with specific text comprehension problems. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 359–375). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Ouellette, Gene, & Beers, Ashley. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1
    • Proctor, C. Patrick, Dalton, Bridget, Uccelli, Paola, Biancarosa, Gina, Mo, Elaine, Snow, Catherine, & Neugebauer, Sabina. (2011). Improving comprehension online: Effects of deep vocabulary instruction with bilingual and monolingual fifth graders. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 517–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9218-2
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Roncoli, Silvia, & Masterson, Jackie. (2016). ‘Unexpected’ spelling difficulty in a 10-year-old child with good reading skills: An intervention case study. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1159539
    • Shechter, Ady, Lipka, Orly, & Katzir, Tami. (2018). Predictive models of word reading fluency in Hebrew. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:1882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01882
    • Singh, Nandini Chatterjee, & Sumathi, T. A. (2019). The role of phonological processing and oral language in the acquisition of reading skills in Devanagari. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 261–276). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_14
    • Townsend, Dianna, & Collins, Penny. (2009). Academic vocabulary and middle school English learners: An intervention study. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 993–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9141-y
  • Ouellette, G. (2010). Orthographic learning in learning to spell: The roles of semantics and type of practice. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.009 Cited by5
    • Bhide, Adeetee, & Perfetti, Charles. (2019). Challenges in learning akshara orthographies for second language learners. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 311–326). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_16
    • Bosse, Marie-Line. (2015). Learning to read and spell: How children acquire word orthographic knowledge. Child Development Perspectives, 9(4), 222–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12133
    • McClung, Nicola A., O'Donnell, Colleen R., & Cunningham, Anne E. (2012). Orthographic learning and the development of visual word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 173–195). London: Psychology Press.
    • Nunes, Terezinha. (2016). Teaching literacy to English children: Policy and practice. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 205–221). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Weth, Constanze, Ugen, Sonja, Fayol, Michel, & Bîlici, Natalia. (2021). Spelling patterns of plural marking and learning trajectories in French taught as a foreign language. Written Language & Literacy, 24(1), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00048.wet
  • Ouellette, Gene, & Beers, Ashley. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1 Cited by5
    • Ahmed, Yusra, & Wagner, Richard K. (2020). A “simple” illustration of a joint model of reading and writing using meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM). In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 55–75). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_4
    • Cain, Kate, Compton, Donald L., & Parrila, Rauno K. (2017c). Introduction to reading comprehension. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 237–238). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Gottardo, Alexandra, Javier, Christine, Farnia, Fataneh, Mak, Lorinda, & Geva, Esther. (2014). Bidirectional cross-linguistic relations of first and second language skills in reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English learners [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 62–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.04got
    • Sadeghi, Amir, Everatt, John, & McNeill, Brigid. (2016). A simple model of Persian reading. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.1003768
    • Singh, Nandini Chatterjee, & Sumathi, T. A. (2019). The role of phonological processing and oral language in the acquisition of reading skills in Devanagari. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 261–276). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_14
  • Ouellette, G. P., & Sénéchal, M. (2008a). A window into early literacy: Exploring the cognitive and linguistic underpinnings of invented spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430801917324 Cited by6
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A., Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Khateb, Asaid. (2017). What contributes to spelling in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218748
    • Gedutienė, Reda. (2020). Research of reading and writing in Lithuania: Past, present and future. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 223–234). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_14
    • Lo, Jason Chor Ming, Ye, Yanyan, Tong, Xiuhong, McBride, Catherine, Ho, Connie Suk-han, & Waye, Mary Miu Yee. (2018). Delayed copying is uniquely related to dictation in bilingual Cantonese–English-speaking children in Hong Kong. Writing Systems Research, 10(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2018.1481902
    • Nunes, Terezinha. (2016). Teaching literacy to English children: Policy and practice. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 205–221). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Sénéchal, Monique, Ouellette, Gene, Pagan, Stephanie, & Lever, Rosemary. (2012). The role of invented spelling on learning to read in low-phoneme awareness kindergartners: A randomized-control-trial study. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9310-2
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ouellette, G. P., & Sénéchal, M. (2008b). Pathways to literacy: A study of invented spelling and its role in learning to read. Child Development, 79(4), 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01166.x Cited by5
    • Aram, Dorit. (2010). Writing with young children: A comparison of paternal and maternal guidance [Special Issue:Writing development: Cognitive, sociocultural, linguistic perspectives, edited b Debra Myhill & Ros Fisher]. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01429.x
    • Elimelech, Adi, Aram, Dorit, & Levin, Iris. (2020). Mothers teaching their children the Hebrew writing system: The effects on children’s early writing and reading skills. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 263–287). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_17
    • Sénéchal, Monique. (2015). Young children's home literacy experiences. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 397–414). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Sénéchal, Monique, Ouellette, Gene, Pagan, Stephanie, & Lever, Rosemary. (2012). The role of invented spelling on learning to read in low-phoneme awareness kindergartners: A randomized-control-trial study. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9310-2
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Outhwaite, Ben. (2013). Lines of communication: Medieval Hebrew letters of the eleventh century. In Esther-Miriam Wagner, Ben Outhwaite, & Bettina Beinhoff (Eds.), Scribes as agents of language change (Studies in Language Change 10) (pp. 183–198). Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter. Cited by1
    • Outhwaite, Ben. (2020). The Sefer Torah and Jewish orthodoxy in the Islamic middle ages. In Bradford A. Anderson (Ed.), From scrolls to scrolling: Sacred texts, materiality, and dynamic media cultures (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam – Tension, Transmission, Transformation 12) (pp. 64–89). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110634440-005
  • Outhwaite, Ben. (2020). The Sefer Torah and Jewish orthodoxy in the Islamic middle ages. In Bradford A. Anderson (Ed.), From scrolls to scrolling: Sacred texts, materiality, and dynamic media cultures (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam – Tension, Transmission, Transformation 12) (pp. 64–89). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110634440-005
  • Overmann, Karenleigh A. (2016). Beyond writing: The development of literacy in the ancient Near East. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000019 Cited by3
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Chrisomalis, Stephen. (2017). Re-evaluating merit: Multiple overlapping factors explain the evolution of numerical notations. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1227688
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2020a). Material entanglements of writing practices in the Bronze Age Aegean and Cyprus. Sustainability, 12, 10671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410671
  • Overmann, Karenleigh A. (2021). A cognitive archaeology of writing: Concepts, models, goals. In Philip J. Boyes, Philippa M. Steele, & Natalia Elvira Astoreca (Eds.), The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices (pp. 55–72). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books. Cited by1
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2020a). Material entanglements of writing practices in the Bronze Age Aegean and Cyprus. Sustainability, 12, 10671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410671
Compiled and edited by Terry Joyce. © April, 2022