• Qiu, X. (2000). Chinese writing (Translated by G. L. Mattos & J. Norman). Berkeley: The Society for the Study of Early China; The Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California. Cited by13
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Englehardt, Joshua (Ed.). (2012). Agency in ancient writing. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
    • Galambos, Imre. (2014b). The Chinese script. Chinese Studies, Oxford Bibliographies (added: 28/04/2014). http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/browse?module_0=obo-9780199920082
    • Handel, Zev. (2019). Sinography: The borrowing and adaptation of the Chinese script (Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis 1). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352223
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2012). The shape of script: How and why writing systems change (School for Advanced Research Advanced Seminar Series). Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
    • Li, F. (2018). The development of literacy in early China: With the nature and uses of bronze inscriptions in context, and more. In Anne Kolb (Ed.), Literacy in ancient everyday life (pp. 13–42). Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020). Types of allography. Open Linguistics, 6, 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0006
    • Schindelin, Cornelia. (2019). The li-variation (隶变/隸變) lìbiàn. When the ancient Chinese writing changed to modern Chinese script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 227–243). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-schi
    • Shaughnessy, Edward L. (2010). The beginnings of writing in China. In Christopher Woods (Ed.) with the assistance of Geoff Emberling & Emily Teeter, Visible language: Inventions of writing in the ancient Middle East and beyond (Oriental Institute Museum Publications 32) (pp. 215–221). Chicago, IL: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
    • Wang, Shaomei. (2012a). Chinese writing reform: A socio-psycholinguistic perspective. In Ken Goodman, Shaomei Wang, Mieko Shimizu Iventosch, & Yetta Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 45–67). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Woods, Christopher. (2010a). Introduction. Visible language: The earliest writing systems. in Christopher Woods (Ed.) with the assistance of Geoff Emberling & Emily Teeter, Visible language: Inventions of writing in the ancient Middle East and beyond (Oriental Institute Museum Publications 32) (pp. 15–25). Chicago, IL: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
  • Quack, Joachim Friedrich. (2010a). From group-writing to word association: Representation and integration of foreign words in Egyptian script. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 73–92). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Quack, Joachim Friedrich. (2010b). Difficult hieroglyphs and unreadable demotic? How the ancient Egyptians dealt with the complexities of their script. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 235–251). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Quack, Joachim Friedrich. (2010c). Egyptian writing for non-Egyptian languages and vice versa: A short overview. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 317–325). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Quack, Joachim Friedrich. (2012). Old wine in new wineskins? How to write classical Egyptian rituals in more modern writing systems. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 219–243). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Quaegebeur, Jan. (1982). De la préhistoire de l'écriture copte. Orientalia Lovanensia Periodica, 13, 125–136. Cited by3
    • Davies, W. V. (1987). Egyptian hieroglyphs (Reading the past). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press. [1990, In J. T. Hooker (Ed.), Reading the past: Ancient writing from cuneiform to the alphabet (pp. 75–135). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press]
    • Ritner, Robert K. (1996b). The Coptic alphabet. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 287–290). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Stadler, Martin Andreas. (2008). On the demise of Egyptian writing: Working with a problematic source basis. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 157–181). London: Equinox Publishing.
  • Quantz, J. O. (1897). Problems in the psychology of reading. Psychological Monographs, 2, 1 [whole issue]. Cited by6
    • Gibson, Eleanor J., & Levin, Harry. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Günther, Hartmut. (1996a). Historisch-systematischer Aufriß der psychologischen Leseforschung [Historical outline of psychological research on reading]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 918–831). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Venezky, Richard L. (1977). Principles for the design of practical writing systems. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 37–54). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Venezky, Richard L. (2006). Foundations for studying basic processes in reading. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 7359–758). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Quick, Laura. (2020). Scribal habits and scholarly texts: Codicology at Oxyrhynchus and Qumran. In Anna Krauß, Jonas Leipziger, & Friederike Schücking-Jungblut (Eds.), Material aspects of reading in ancient and medieval cultures: Materiality, presence and performance (Materiale Textkulturen 26) (pp. 37–54). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110639247-004
Compiled and edited by Terry Joyce. © April, 2022