• Faber, Alice. (1981). Phonetic reconstruction. Glossa, 15, 233–262. Cited by5
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1999). Some Semitic phonological considerations on the sibilants of the Greek alphabet. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 57–61.
    • Krispijn, Theo J. H. (2012). Writing Semitic with cuneiform script. The interaction of Sumerian and Akkadian orthography in the second half of the third millennium BC. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 181–218). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Threatte, Leslie (1999). [Book review: Roger D. Woodard, (1997), Greek writing from Knossos to Homer: A linguistic interpretation of the origin of the Greek alphabet and the continuity of Ancient Greek literacy]. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 145–152.
  • Faber, Alice. (1984). Semitic sibilants in an Afro-Asiatic context. Journal of Semitic Studies, 29(2), 189–24. Cited by5
    • Allen, James P. (2013). The ancient Egyptian language: An historical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1999). Some Semitic phonological considerations on the sibilants of the Greek alphabet. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 57–61.
    • Goerwitz, Richard L. (1996). The Jewish scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 487–498). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Krispijn, Theo J. H. (2012). Writing Semitic with cuneiform script. The interaction of Sumerian and Akkadian orthography in the second half of the third millennium BC. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 181–218). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Threatte, Leslie (1999). [Book review: Roger D. Woodard, (1997), Greek writing from Knossos to Homer: A linguistic interpretation of the origin of the Greek alphabet and the continuity of Ancient Greek literacy]. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 145–152.
  • Faber, Alice. (1992). Phonemic segmentation as epiphenomenon: Evidence from the history of alphabetic writing. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 111–134). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Cited by36
    • Aronoff, Mark. (1992). Segmentalism in linguistics: The alphabetic basis of phonological theory. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 71-82). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Baroni, Antonio. (2011). Alphabetic vs. non-alphabetic writing: Linguistic fit and natural tendencies. Rivista di Linguistica [Italian Journal of Linguistics], 23(2), 127–159.
    • Cook, Vivian. (2004). The English writing system. (The English Language series). London Hodder Arnold. [2014, reprinted, London: New York: Routledge]
    • Cook, Vivian, & Bassetti, Benedetta. (2005). An introduction to researching second language writing systems. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 1–67). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996b). Typology of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1380–1387). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2009). Evaluating merit–the evolution of writing reconsidered. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp001
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2018). Revisiting the ‘tyranny of writing’. In Constanze Weth & Kasper Juffermans (Eds.), Tyranny of writing: Ideologies of the written word (Bloomsbury advances in sociolinguistics) (pp. 19–29). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2019). „Die Buchstabenschrift ist an und für sich die intelligentere.‟ Überlegungen zur Bewertung von Schriftsystemen. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st Century: Brest, June 13-15, 2018, Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 1–16). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-coul
    • Crellin, Robert. (2019). Writing vowels in Punic: From morphography to phonography [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00026.cre
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1998). [Book review: D. Gary Miller, (1994), Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(1), 141–147.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1999). Some Semitic phonological considerations on the sibilants of the Greek alphabet. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 57–61.
    • Davidson, Andrew. (2019). Writing: The re-construction of language. Language Sciences, 72, 134–149. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.09.004
    • Evertz, Martin. (2018). Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2021). S
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2021). A modular theoretic approach to the Japanese writing system: Possibilities and challenges. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 621–643). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-hond
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Joyce, Terry. (2016). Writing systems and scripts. In Andrea Rocci & Louis de Saussure (Eds.), Verbal communication (Handbooks of Communication Science 3) (pp. 287–308). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255478-016
    • Joyce, Terry, & Borgwaldt, Susanne R. (2011). Typology of writing systems: Special issue introduction [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.01joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Lew, Sigrid. (2014). A linguistic analysis of the Lao writing system and its suitability for minority language orthographies [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.846843
    • Linell, Per. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations (Routledge Advances in Communication and Linguistic Theory). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • O'Connor, M. (1996c). The alphabet as a technology. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 787–794). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Ratcliffe, Robert R. (2001). What do “phonemic” writing systems represent?: Arabic huruuf, Japanese kana, and the moraic principle. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 1–14.
    • Smith, Janet S. (Shibamoto) (1996). Japanese writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 209–217). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Song, Hye Jeong, & Wiese, Richard. (2010). Resistance to complexity interacting with visual shape—German and Korean orthography. Writing Systems Research, 2(2) 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq010
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2003). A formal computational analysis of Indic scripts. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 9–40). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2006). Brahmi-derived scripts, script layout, and segmental awareness [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.05spr
    • Sproat, Richard. (2018). [Book review: Peter T. Daniels, (2018), An exploration of writing]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(2), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00017.spr
    • Swank, Heidi. (2008). It all hinges on the vowels: Reconsidering the alphasyllabary classification. Written Language & Literacy, 11(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.1.06swa
    • Swank, Heidi. (2009). A response to Peter T. Daniels. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.10swa
  • Facoetti, Andrea, Franceschini, Sandro, & Gori, Simone. (2019). Role of visual attention in developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 307–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.014
  • Facoetti, A., Zorzi, M., Cestnick, L., Lorusso, M. L., Molteni, M., Paganoni, P., Umiltà, C., & Mascetti, G. G. (2006). The relationship between visuo-spatial attention and nonword reading in developmental dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 841–855. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02643290500483090 Cited by5
    • Facoetti, Andrea, Franceschini, Sandro, & Gori, Simone. (2019). Role of visual attention in developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 307–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.014
    • Holmes, V. M. (2012). Adult word recognition and visual sequential memory. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9245-z
    • Orsolini, Margherita, Fanari, Rachele, Cerracchio, Sara, & Famiglietti, Luisa. (2009). Phonological and lexical reading in Italian children with dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 933–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9134-x
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Ziegler, Johannes C., Perry, Conrad, & Zorzi, Marco. (2019). Modeling the variability of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 350–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.016
  • Fairbank, Alfred. (1949). The book of scripts. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Cited by6
    • Clayton, Ewan. (2013). The golden thread: The story of writing. London: Atlantic Books; Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint.
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Dowding, Geoffrey. (1961). An introduction to the history of printing types: An illustrated summary of the main stages in the development of type design from 1440 up to the present day: An aid to type face identification. London: Wace & Company. [1998, reprinted, London: The British Library; New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press]
    • Drogin, Marc. (1980). Medieval calligraphy: Its history and technique. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun and Co. [1989, Corrected reprint, New York: Dover Publications]
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    • Firmage, R. A. (1993). The alphabet abecedarium: Some notes on letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine. [2000, Reprinted, London: Bloomsbury]
  • Fairbank, Alfred. (1970). The story of handwriting: Origins and development. London: Faber and Faber. Cited by5
    • Clayton, Ewan. (2013). The golden thread: The story of writing. London: Atlantic Books; Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Drogin, Marc. (1980). Medieval calligraphy: Its history and technique. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun and Co. [1989, Corrected reprint, New York: Dover Publications]
    • Firmage, R. A. (1993). The alphabet abecedarium: Some notes on letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine. [2000, Reprinted, London: Bloomsbury]
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
  • Fairservis, Walter A. (1992). The Harappan civilization and its writing: A model for the decipherment of the Indus script. Leiden; New York; København; Köln: E. J. Brill. Cited by3
    • Bright, William. (1998b). [Book review: Gregory L. Possehl, (1996), Indus age: The writing system]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 272–275.
    • Farmer, Steve, Sproat, Richard, & Witzel, Michael. (2004). The collapse of the Indus-script thesis: The myth of a literate Harappan civilization. Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 11(2), 19–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/ejvs.2004.2.620
    • Pettersson, John Sören. (1996b). Numerical notation. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 795–806). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Falk, H. (1993). Schrift im alten Indien: Ein Forschungsbericht mit Anmerkungen (Script Oralia 56). Tübingen: Narr. Cited by13
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1998). [Book review: D. Gary Miller, (1994), Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(1), 141–147.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2000). On writing syllabaries: Three episodes of transfer [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 73–86.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2001). Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 43–80). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. [2017, Second edition, (pp. 75–94)]
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • Falk, Harry. (2001). [Book review: Richard Salomon, (1998), Indian epigraphy. A guide to the study of inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan languages]. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 96–101.
    • Falk, Harry. (2010). Foreign terms in Sanskrit pertaining to writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 207–217). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Falk, Harry. (2018). The creation and spread of scripts in ancient India. In Anne Kolb (Ed.), Literacy in ancient everyday life (pp. 43–66). Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Oberlies, Thomas. (2001). [Book review: Richard Salomon, (1999), Ancient Buddhist scrolls from Gandhāra: The British Library Kharoṣṭhī fragments]. Written Language & Literacy, 4(2), 230–234.
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Salomon, Corinna. (2021). Comparative perspectives on the study of script transfer, and the origin of the runic script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 143–199). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-salo
    • Salomon, Richard G. (1996). Brahmi and Kharoshthi. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 373–383). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sander, Lore. (2003). Brāhmī scripts in North India from the beginning in the 3rd cent. B.C. to the 7th cent. A.D. under the aspect of digitisation. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 92–102). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Strauch, Ingo. (2012). The character of the Indian Kharoṣṭhī script and the “Sanskrit Revolution”: A writing system between identity and assimilation. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 131–168). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Falk, Harry. (1996). Aramaic script and the Kharoṣṭhī: A comparison. Berliner Indologische Studien, 9/10, 151–156. Cited by6
    • Bright, William. (2003). How written symbols change: Toward a historical grammatology. In Peri Bhaskararao (Ed.), Working papers for the International Symposium on Indic Scripts: Past and Future. (pp. 1–8). Tokyo: Research Institute of the Language Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    • Falk, Harry. (2001). [Book review: Richard Salomon, (1998), Indian epigraphy. A guide to the study of inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan languages]. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 96–101.
    • Falk, Harry. (2010). Foreign terms in Sanskrit pertaining to writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 207–217). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Falk, Harry. (2018). The creation and spread of scripts in ancient India. In Anne Kolb (Ed.), Literacy in ancient everyday life (pp. 43–66). Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Oberlies, Thomas. (2001). [Book review: Richard Salomon, (1999), Ancient Buddhist scrolls from Gandhāra: The British Library Kharoṣṭhī fragments]. Written Language & Literacy, 4(2), 230–234.
    • Strauch, Ingo. (2012). The character of the Indian Kharoṣṭhī script and the “Sanskrit Revolution”: A writing system between identity and assimilation. In Alex de Voogt & Joachim Friedrich Quack (Eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders (pp. 131–168). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Falk, Harry. (2001). [Book review: Richard Salomon, (1998), Indian epigraphy. A guide to the study of inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan languages]. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 96–101.
  • Falk, Harry. (2010). Foreign terms in Sanskrit pertaining to writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 207–217). Leiden; Boston: Brill. Cited by1
    • Falk, Harry. (2018). The creation and spread of scripts in ancient India. In Anne Kolb (Ed.), Literacy in ancient everyday life (pp. 43–66). Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Falk, Harry. (2018). The creation and spread of scripts in ancient India. In Anne Kolb (Ed.), Literacy in ancient everyday life (pp. 43–66). Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Falkenstein, Adam. (1936). Archaische Texte aus Uruk (Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft in Uruk-Warka 2). Berlin; Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz. Cited by12
    • Boltz, William G. (1994). The origin and early development of the Chinese writing system (American Oriental Series 78). New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society. [2003, reprinted with corrections]
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Goody, Jack. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind (Themes in the Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goody, Jack. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Green, M. W. (1989). Early cuneiform. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 43–57). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Lecompte, Camille. (2016). Observations on diplomatics, tablet layout and cultural evolution of the early third mMillennium: The archaic texts from Ur. In Thomas E. Balke & Christina Tsouparopoulou (Eds.), Materiality of writing in early Mesopotamia (Materiale Textkulturen 13) (pp. 134–164). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Nissen, Hans. (1986). The archaic texts from Uruk. World Archaeology, 17(3), 317–334.
    • Pope, Maurice. (1975). The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphics to Linear B. London: Thames & Hudson: New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. [1999, Revised edition, The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphs to Maya script. London; New York: Thames & Hudson]
    • Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. (1992). Before writing [Two volumes: Volume 1. From counting to cuneiform; Volume 2. A catalog of near eastern tokens]. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Fan, Fengxiang, & Altmann, Gabriel. (2008). Graphemic representation of English phonemes. In Gabriel Altmann & Fengxiang Fan (Eds.), Analyses of script: Properties of characters and writing systems (Quantitative Linguistics 63) (pp. 25–29). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Cited by3
    • Altmann, Gabriel. (2008). Towards a theory of script. In Gabriel Altmann & Fengxiang Fan (Eds.), Analyses of script: Properties of characters and writing systems (Quantitative Linguistics 63) (pp. 149–164). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    • Cook, Vivian. (2016). Background to the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 5–23). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Kelih, Emmerich. (2008). The phoneme-grapheme relationship in Slovene. In Gabriel Altmann & Fengxiang Fan (Eds.), Analyses of script: Properties of characters and writing systems (Quantitative Linguistics 63) (pp. 61–74). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Fan, K. Y., Gao, J. Y., & Ao, X. P. (1984). Pronunciation principles of the Chinese character and alphabetic writing scripts. Chinese character reform, 3, 19–22. Beijing: National Commission of Chinese Character Reform. [in Chinese] Cited by5
    • Su, Yi-Fen, & Samuels, S. Jay. (2010). Developmental changes in character-complexity and word-length effects when reading Chinese script. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1085–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9197-3
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Williams, Clay, & Bever, Thomas. (2010). Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias? Reading and Writing, 23(5), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9228-0
    • Xu, Min, Tan, Li Hai, & Perfetti, Charles. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Chinese. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 200–225). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.010
    • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1999b). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837.
  • Fang, S. P., Horng, R. Y., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (1986). Consistency effects in the Chinese character and pseudo-character naming tasks. In H. S. R. Kao & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Linguistics, psychology, and the Chinese language (pp. 11–21). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press. Cited by18
    • Bertelson, Paul, Chen, Hsuan-Chih, & de Gelder, Béatrice. (1997). Explicit speech analysis and orthographic experience in Chinese readers. In Hsuan-Chih Chen, (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 27–46). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Cheng, Chao-Ming, & Lan, Ying-Hsiang. (2011). An implicit test of Chinese orthographic satiation. Reading and Writing, 24(1), 55–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9201-y
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Hanley, J. Richard, Tzeng, Ovid, & Huang, H.-S. (1999). Learning to read Chinese. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 173–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ho, Connie Suk-Han, Law, Teresa Pui-Sze, & Ng, Penny Man. (2000). The phonological deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008040922662
    • Hue, Chih-Wei. (1992). Recognition processes in character naming. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 93–107). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Hung, Daisy L., Tzeng, Ovid J. L., Lee, Wei Ling, & Chang, Ji Mei. (1994). Orthography, reading disability, and cerebral organization. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 11–35). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Hung, Daisy L., Tzeng, Ovid J. L., & Tzeng, Angela K. Y. (1992). Automatic activation of linguistic information in Chinese character recognition. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 119–130). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Ko, Hwawei, & Tzeng, Ovid J. L. (2000). The role of phonological awareness in a phonetically opaque script [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachu]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 119–132.
    • Leong, Che Kan, & Cheng, Pui-Wan. (2003). Consistency effects on lexical decision and naming of two-character Chinese words. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(5), 455–474.
    • Liu, In-Mao. (1997). The issue of prelexical phonology in the reading of Chinese characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 65–75). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Tzeng, Ovid J. L., & Hung, Daisy L. (1988b). Orthography, reading, and cerebral functions. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 273–290). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Tzeng, Ovid J. L., Hung, Daisy L., Lee, Wei Ling, & Chang, Ji-Mei. (1996). Cross-Linguistic analyses of basic reading processes. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1101–1117). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Weekes, B. S., Chen, M. J., & Lin, Y-B. (1998). Differential effects of phonological priming on Chinese character recognition [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 201–222. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 47–68). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Wu, Jei-Tun, & Liu, In-Mao. (1997). Phonological activation in pronouncing characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 47–64). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Yang, Hui, & Peng, Dan-ling. (1997). The learning and naming of Chinese characters of elementary school children. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 323–346). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1999b). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837.
  • Fang, S. P., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Alva, L. (1981). Intralanguage versus interlanguage Stroop effects in two types of writing systems. Memory & Cognition, 6, 609–617. Cited by6
    • Flores d'Arcais, Giovanni B. (1992). Graphemic, phonological and semantic activation processes during the recognition of Chinese characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 37–66). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Kess, Joseph F., & Miyamoto, Tadao. (1999). The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Leong, Che Kan. (1995). Orthographic and psycholinguistic considerations in developing literacy in Chinese. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 163–183). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Paradis, Michel, Hagiwara, Hiroko, & Hildebrandt, Nancy. (1985). Neurolinguistic aspects of the Japanese writing system (Perspectives in Neurolinguistics, Neuropsychology, and Psycholinguistics). Tokyo; Orlando, FL; London: Academic Press.
    • Tzeng, Ovid J. L., & Hung, Daisy L. (1988b). Orthography, reading, and cerebral functions. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 273–290). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Tzeng, Ovid J. L., Hung, Daisy L., Lee, Wei Ling, & Chang, Ji-Mei. (1996). Cross-Linguistic analyses of basic reading processes. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1101–1117). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Fang, S. P., & Wu, P. (1989). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 434–447. Cited by6
    • Cheng, Chao-Ming, & Lan, Ying-Hsiang. (2011). An implicit test of Chinese orthographic satiation. Reading and Writing, 24(1), 55–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9201-y
    • Huang, Jong-Tsun, & Wang, Man-Ying. (1992). From unit to gestalt: Perceptual dynamics in recognizing Chinese characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 3–35). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Li, Hong, &Chen, Hsuan-Chih. (1997). Processing of radicals in Chinese character recognition. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 141–160). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Pak, Ada K. H., Cheng-Lai, Alice, Tso, Ivy F., Shu, Hua, Lia, Wenling, & Anderson, Richard C. (2005). Visual chunking skills of Hong Kong children. Reading and Writing, 18(5), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-6575-3
    • Saito, Hirofumi, Kawakami, Masahiro, Masuda, Hisashi, & Flores d'Arcais, Giovanni B. (1997). Contributions of radical components to kanji character recognition and recall. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 109–140). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Saito, H., Masuda, H., & Kawakami, M. (1998). Form and sound similarity effects in kanji recognition [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 323–357. [Also published as Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 169–203). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
  • Farmer, M. E., & Klein, R. (1995). The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 460–493. Cited by19
    • Booth, James R., Perfetti, Charles A., MacWhinney, Brian, & Hunt, Sean B. (2000). The association of rapid temporal perception with orthographic and phonological processing in children and adults with reading impairment. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 101–132.
    • Bowers, Patricia G., & Newby-Clark, Elissa. (2002). The role of naming speed within a model of reading acquisition [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 109–126.
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Breznitz, Zvia, & Share, David. (2002). Introduction on timing and phonology [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 1–3.
    • Chiappe, Penny, Stringer, Ron, Siegel, Linda S., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2002). Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 73–107.
    • Edwards, Jerri D., Walley, Amanda C., & Ball, Karlene K. (2003). Phonological, visual and temporal processing in adults with and without reading disability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(8), 737–758.
    • Groth, Katarina, Lachmann, Thomas, Riecker, Axel, Muthmann, Irene, & Steinbrink, Claudia. (2011). Developmental dyslexics show deficits in the processing of temporal auditory information in German vowel length discrimination. Reading and Writing, 24(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9213-7
    • Ho, Connie Suk-Han, Law, Teresa Pui-Sze, & Ng, Penny Man. (2000). The phonological deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008040922662
    • Katzir, Tami, Shaul, Shelly, Bretnitz, Zvia, & Wolf, Maryanne. (2004). The universal and the unique in dyslexia: A cross-linguistic investigation of reading and reading fluency in Hebrew-and English-speaking children with reading disorders [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 739–768.
    • Kim, Jeesun, & Davis, Chris. (2004). Characteristics of poor readers of Korean hangul: Auditory, visual and phonological processing [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 153–185. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000013804.76677.a9
    • Klein, Raymond M. (2002). Observations on the temporal correlates of reading failure [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 207–232.
    • Olson, Richard, & Datta, Helen. (2002). Visual-temporal processing in reading-disabled and normal twins [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 127–149.
    • Savage, Robert. (2004). Motor skills, automaticity and developmental dyslexia: A review of the research literature. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(3), 301–324.
    • Share, David L., Jorm, Anthony F., MacLean, Rod, & Matthews, Russell. (2002). Temporal processing and reading disability [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 151–178.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Reitsma, Pieter, & Siegel, Linda S. (2011). Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9232-4
    • Wolf, Maryanne, O'Rourke, Alyssa Goldberg, Gidney, Calvin, Lovett, Maureen, Cirino, Paul, & Morris, Robin. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013816320290
    • Wolff, Peter H. (2002). Timing precision and rhythm in developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 179–206.
  • Farmer, Steve, Sproat, Richard, & Witzel, Michael. (2004). The collapse of the Indus-script thesis: The myth of a literate Harappan civilization. Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 11(2), 19–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/ejvs.2004.2.620 Cited by9
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • Falk, Harry. (2010). Foreign terms in Sanskrit pertaining to writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 207–217). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Handel, Zev. (2019). Sinography: The borrowing and adaptation of the Chinese script (Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis 1). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352223
    • Sproat, Richard. (2010). Language, technology, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2017). A computational model of the discovery of writing. Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 194-226. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00004.spr
    • Sproat, Richard. (2018). [Book review: Peter T. Daniels, (2018), An exploration of writing]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(2), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00017.spr
    • Weingarten, Rüdiger. (2011). Comparative graphematics [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 12–38. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.02wei [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 13–39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
  • Farnell, Brenda. (1996). Movement notation systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 855–879). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by3
    • Hopkins, Jason. (2008). Choosing how to write sign language: A sociolinguistic perspective [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.036
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Kolff, Joukje. (2010). Writing dance. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 357–380). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
  • Farran, Lama K., Bingham, Gary E., & Matthews, Mona W. (2014). Environmental contributions to language and literacy outcomes in bilingual English-Arabic children in the U.S. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 351–379). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Farrell, Joseph. (2009). The impermanent text in Catullus and other Roman poets. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 164–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Farrell, Joseph P. (2009). Literacy and international development: Education and literacy as basic human rights. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 518–534). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by1
    • Olson, David R. (2009b). Literacy, literacy policy, and the school. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 566–576). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fashola, O. S., Drum, P. A., Mayer, R. E., & Kang, J.-S. (1996). A cognitive theory of orthographic transitioning: Predictable errors in how Spanish-speaking children spell English words. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 825–843. Cited by7
    • Allaith, Zainab A., & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2011). Spelling performance of English consonants among students whose first language is Arabic [Special issue: Literacy acquisition in Arabic, edited by Abdessatar Mahfoudhi, John Everatt & Gad Elbeheri]. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 1089–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9294-3
    • Figueredo, L. (2006). Using the known to chart the unknown: A review of first-language influence on the development of English-as-a-second-language spelling skill. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 873–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9014-1
    • Leikin, Mark, Schwartz, Mila, & Share, David L. (2010). General and specific benefits of bi-literate bilingualism: A Russian–Hebrew study of beginning literacy [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9210-x
    • Raynolds, Laura B., & Uhry, Joanna K. (2010). The invented spellings of non-Spanish phonemes by Spanish–English bilingual and English monolingual kindergarteners. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9169-7
    • Rolla San Francisco, Andrea, Mo, Elaine, Carlo, María, August, Diane, & Snow, Catherine. (2006). The influences of language of literacy instruction and vocabulary on the spelling of Spanish–English bilinguals. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9012-3
    • Sun-Alperin, M. Kendra, & Wang, Min. (2011). Cross-language transfer of phonological and orthographic processing skills from Spanish L1 to English L2. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9221-7
    • Wang, Min, & Geva, Esther. (2003a). Spelling acquisition of novel English phonemes in Chinese children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 325–348.
  • Faust, Miriam, & Kandelshine-Waldman, Osnat. (2011). The effects of different approaches to reading instruction on letter detection tasks in normally achieving and low achieving readers. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 545–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9219-1
  • Favreau, M., Komoda, M., & Segalowitz, N. (1980). Second language reading: Implications of the word superiority effect in skilled bilinguals. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 370–380. Cited by4
    • Geva, Esther, Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Shany, Michal. (1997). Development of reading efficiency in first and second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_2
    • Hickey, Tina. (2005). Second language writing systems: Minority languages and reluctant readers. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 398–423). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Lyddy, Fiona, & Roche-Dwyer, Catherine. (2008). A bilingual word superiority effect in Irish speakers. Written Language & Literacy, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.1.02lyd
    • Miller-Guron, Louise, & Lundberg, Ingvar. (2000). Dyslexia and second language reading: A second bite at the apple? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 41–61.
  • Favreau, M., & Segalowitz, N. (1983). Automatic and controlled processes in the first- and second-language reading of fluent bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 11, 565–574. Cited by5
    • Akamatsu, Nobuhiko. (1999). The effects of first language orthographic features on word recognition processing in English as a second language [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008053520326
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Geva, Esther, Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Shany, Michal. (1997). Development of reading efficiency in first and second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_2
    • Liu, Ying, & Peng, Dan-ling. (1997). Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 219–232). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Geva, Esther. (1999). Processing inflected morphology in second language word recognition: Russian-speakers and English-speakers read Hebrew [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 321–343.
  • Fawcett, A. J., & Nicolson, R. I. (1994). Naming speed in children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 641–646. Cited by5
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Chiappe, Penny, Stringer, Ron, Siegel, Linda S., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2002). Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 73–107.
    • Geva, Esther, Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Shany, Michal. (1997). Development of reading efficiency in first and second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_2
    • Groth, Katarina, Lachmann, Thomas, Riecker, Axel, Muthmann, Irene, & Steinbrink, Claudia. (2011). Developmental dyslexics show deficits in the processing of temporal auditory information in German vowel length discrimination. Reading and Writing, 24(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9213-7
    • Tractenberg, Rochelle E. (2001). Exploring a new silent test of phonological awareness. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 195–228.
  • Fawcett, A. J., & Nicolson, R. I. (1995). Persistence of phonological awareness deficits in older children with dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 361–376. Cited by4
    • Leinonen, Seija, Müller, Kurt, Leppänen, Paavo H. T., Aro, Mikko, Ahonen, Timo, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2001). Heterogeneity in adult dyslexic readers: Relating processing skills to the speed and accuracy of oral text reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 265–296.
    • Tractenberg, Rochelle E. (2001). Exploring a new silent test of phonological awareness. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 195–228.
    • Valdois, Sylviane, Bosse, Marie-Line, Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., Zorman, Michel, David, D., & Pellat, Jacques. (2003). Phonological and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from two case studies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(6), 541–572.
    • Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Siegel, Linda S. (1997). The spelling performance of ESL and native speakers of English as a function of reading skill [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 387–406.
  • Fayol, M. (1997). Des idées au texte. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Cited by4
    • Fayol, M., Totereau, Corinne, & Barrouillet, Pierre. (2006). Disentangling the impact of semantic and formal factors in the acquisition of number inflections: Noun, adjective and verb agreement in written French [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-1371-7
    • Jaffré, Jean-Pierre, & Fayol, Michel. (2006). Orthography and literacy in French. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 81–103). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Mazur-Palandre, Audrey. (2015). Overcoming preferred argument structure in written French: Development, modality, text type. Written Language & Literacy, 18(1), 25–55. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.02maz
    • Ragnarsdóttir, Hrafnhildur, Aparici, Melina, Cahana-Amitay, Dalia, van Hell, Janet, & Viguié, Anne. (2002). Verbal structure and content in written discourse: Expository and narrative texts [Special issue: Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities in speech and writing (Part 1), edited by Ruth A. Berman & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 5(1), 95–126.
  • Fayol, Michel, Hupet, Michel, & Largy, Pierre. (1999). The acquisition of subject-verb agreement in written French: From novices to experts' errors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008038127807 Cited by5
    • Caravolas, Marketa. (2006). Learning to spell in different languages: How orthographic variables might affect early literacy. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 497–511). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Fayol, M., Totereau, Corinne, & Barrouillet, Pierre. (2006). Disentangling the impact of semantic and formal factors in the acquisition of number inflections: Noun, adjective and verb agreement in written French [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-1371-7
    • Jaffré, Jean-Pierre, & Fayol, Michel. (2006). Orthography and literacy in French. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 81–103). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, Esther. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
    • Weth, Constanze, Ugen, Sonja, Fayol, Michel, & Bîlici, Natalia. (2021). Spelling patterns of plural marking and learning trajectories in French taught as a foreign language. Written Language & Literacy, 24(1), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00048.wet
  • Fayol, M., Largy, P., & Lemaire, P. (1994). When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors: A study in French written language. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 437–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749408401119 Cited by9
    • Alamargot, Denis, Lambert, Eric, Thebault, Claire, & Dansac, Christophe. (2007). Text composition by deaf and hearing middle-school students: The role of working memory. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9033-y
    • Bourdin, Béatrice, & Fayol, Michel. (2000). Is graphic activity cognitively costly? A developmental approach. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 183–196.
    • Cook, Vivian, & Bassetti, Benedetta. (2005). An introduction to researching second language writing systems. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 1–67). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Fayol, Michel, Hupet, Michel, & Largy, Pierre. (1999). The acquisition of subject-verb agreement in written French: From novices to experts' errors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008038127807
    • Hoang, Ha. (2019). Metaphorical language in second language learners’ texts: Additional baggage of the writing journey? In Eva Lindgren & Kirk P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (Studies in Writing 38) (pp. 236–257). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_012
    • Jaffré, Jean-Pierre, & Fayol, Michel. (2006). Orthography and literacy in French. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 81–103). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Ravid, Dorit. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: Phonological and morphological factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011192806656
    • Sandra, Dominiek, Frisson, Steven, & Daems, Frans. (2004). Still errors after all those years ...: Limited attentional resources and homophone frequency account for spelling errors on silent verb suffixes in Dutch [Special issue: Process and acquisition of written language, edited by Robert Schreuder & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(1), 61–77.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Fayol, Michel, & Mouchon, Serge. (1997). Production and comprehension of connectives in the written modality: A study of written French. In Clotilde Pontecorvo (Ed.), Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6) (pp. 193–204). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. Cited by1
    • Tellings, Agnes E. J. M., & Penning de Vries, Bart. (2020). Connective frequencies in child-directed texts: A corpus analysis in comparison to theorized orders of connective acquisition and to connective frequencies in adult-directed texts. Written Language & Literacy, 23(1), 59–91. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00033.tel
  • Fayol, M., Thevenin, M. G., Jarousse, J. P., & Totereau, C. (1999). From learning to teaching to learning French written morphology. In T. Nunes (Ed.), Learning to read: An integrated view from research and practice (pp. 43–64). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Cited by15
    • Bryant, Peter, Deacon, Hélène, & Nunes, Terezinha. (2006). Morphology and spelling: What have morphemes to do with spelling? In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 601–616). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Bryant, Peter, Nunes, Terezinha, & Aidinis, Athanasios. (1999). Different morphemes, same spelling problems: cross-linguistic developmental studies. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Ed.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 112–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Cook, Vivian, & Bassetti, Benedetta. (2005). An introduction to researching second language writing systems. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 1–67). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, Desrochers, Alain, & Levesque, Kyle. (2017). Learning to read French. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, & Sparks, Erin. (2015). Children's spelling development: Theories and evidence. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 311–325). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Defior, Sylvia, & Serrano, Francisca. (2005). The initial development of spelling in Spanish: From global to analytical. Reading and Writing, 18(1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5893-1
    • Fayol, M., Totereau, Corinne, & Barrouillet, Pierre. (2006). Disentangling the impact of semantic and formal factors in the acquisition of number inflections: Noun, adjective and verb agreement in written French [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-1371-7
    • Geva, Esther. (1999). Introduction: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 275–280.
    • Harris, Margaret, & Gianouli, Vicky. (1999). Learning to read and spell in Greek: the importance of letter knowledge and morphological awareness. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 51–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Jaffré, Jean-Pierre, & Fayol, Michel. (2006). Orthography and literacy in French. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 81–103). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Juul, Holger, & Elbro, Carsten. (2004). The links between grammar and spelling: A cognitive hurdle in deep orthographies? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 915–942.
    • Nunes, Terezinha, Aidinis, Athanasios, & Bryant, Peter. (2006). The acquisition of written morphology in Greek. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 201–218). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Nunes, Terezinha, Bryant, P., & Bindman, Miriam. (2006). The effects of learning to spell on children's awareness of morphology [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 767–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9025-y
    • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, Esther. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
    • Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in French. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 50–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.003
  • Fayol, M., Totereau, Corinne, & Barrouillet, Pierre. (2006). Disentangling the impact of semantic and formal factors in the acquisition of number inflections: Noun, adjective and verb agreement in written French [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-1371-7 Cited by4
    • Berninger, Virginia W., Nagy, William, & Beers, Scott. (2011). Child writers' construction and reconstruction of single sentences and construction of multi-sentence texts: Contributions of syntax and transcription to translation [Special issue: Writing development from early to middle childhood, edited by Virgina W. Berninger, Brett Miller & Victoria J. Molfese]. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9262-y
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, Desrochers, Alain, & Levesque, Kyle. (2017). Learning to read French. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Weth, Constanze, Ugen, Sonja, Fayol, Michel, & Bîlici, Natalia. (2021). Spelling patterns of plural marking and learning trajectories in French taught as a foreign language. Written Language & Literacy, 24(1), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00048.wet
  • Fear, Douglas. (2015). utā pavastāyā utā carmā grftam āha—Written on clay and parchment: Old Persian writing and allography in Iranian. In Susanne Enderwitz & Rebecca Sauer (Eds.), Communication and materiality: Written and unwritten communication in pre-modern societies (Materiale Textkulturen 8) (pp. 73–92). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Febvre, Lucien, & Martin, Henri-Jean. (1958). L'apparition du livre. Paris: Editions Albin Michel. [1976, The coming of the book: The impact of printing 1450–1800 (Translated by David Gerard). London: Verso Editions; New Left Books] Cited by15
    • Auji, Hala. (2016). Printing Arab modernity: Book culture and The American Press in nineteenth-century Beirut (Arts and Archaeology of the Islamic World 7). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Bolter, Jay David. (1991). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [2001, Second edition]
    • Chartier, A.-M. (2009). The teaching of literacy skills in Western Europe: An historical perspective. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 451–467). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Dane, Joseph A. (2012). Out of sorts: On typography and modern theories of print culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. (2011). Divine art, infernal machine: The reception of printing in the West from first impressions to the sense of an ending (Material Texts). Philadelphia, PE; Oxford: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Goody, Jack. (1987). The interface between the written and oral (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Graff, Harvey J. (1987a). The labyrinths of literacy: Reflections on literacy past and present. London: The Falmer Press. [1995, Revised and expanded edition, (Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture), Pittsburgh, PA; London: University of Pittsburgh Press]
    • McLuhan, Marshall. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto; Buffalo; London: University of Toronto Press.
    • Mignolo, Walter D. (1994a). Signs and their transmission: The question of the book in the New World. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 220–270). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Saenger, Paul, & Van Kampen, Kimberly. (1999). The Bible as book: The first printed editions. London; New Castle, DE: The British Library & Oak Knoll Press in association with The Scriptorium: Center for Christian Antiquities.
    • Twyman, Michael. (1998). The British Library guide to printing: History and techniques. London: The British Library.
  • Febvre, Lucien, & Martin, Henri-Jean. (1976). The coming of the book: The impact of printing 1450–1800 (Translated by David Gerard). London: Verso Editions; New Left Books. [1958, L'apparition du livre. Paris: Editions Albin Michel] Cited by20
    • Auji, Hala. (2016). Printing Arab modernity: Book culture and The American Press in nineteenth-century Beirut (Arts and Archaeology of the Islamic World 7). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2013). Reading in print or onscreen: Better, worse, or about the same? In Deborah Tannen & Anna Marie Trester (Eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media (pp. 201–224). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [2007, Second edition]
    • Chartier, A.-M. (2009). The teaching of literacy skills in Western Europe: An historical perspective. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 451–467). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Childress, Diana. (2008). Johannes Gutenberg and the printing press (Pivotal Moments in History). Minneapolis, MN: Twenty-First Century Books.
    • Clayton, Ewan. (2013). The golden thread: The story of writing. London: Atlantic Books; Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Dane, Joseph A. (2012). Out of sorts: On typography and modern theories of print culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Graff, Harvey J. (1987a). The labyrinths of literacy: Reflections on literacy past and present. London: The Falmer Press. [1995, Revised and expanded edition, (Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture), Pittsburgh, PA; London: University of Pittsburgh Press]
    • McKee, Stuart. (2010). How print culture came to be indigenous. Visible Language, 44(2), 161–186.
    • Mullaney, Thomas S. (2017). The Chinese typewriter: A history. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Saenger, Paul, & Van Kampen, Kimberly. (1999). The Bible as book: The first printed editions. London; New Castle, DE: The British Library & Oak Knoll Press in association with The Scriptorium: Center for Christian Antiquities.
    • Scribner, Sylvia, & Cole, Michael. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
    • Shockey, Nathan. (2019). The typographic imagination: Reading and writing in Japan's age of modern print media (Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute). New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Twyman, Michael. (1998). The British Library guide to printing: History and techniques. London: The British Library.
  • Fedeli, Alba. (2020). The Qur'ānic text from manuscript to digital form: Metalinguistic markup of scribes and editors. In Bradford A. Anderson (Ed.), From scrolls to scrolling: Sacred texts, materiality, and dynamic media cultures (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam – Tension, Transmission, Transformation 12) (pp. 213–245). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110634440-010
  • Fedorova, Liudmila L. (2009). The emblematic script of the Aztec codices as a particular semiotic type of writing system [Special issue: Writing systems and linguistic structure, edited by Sang-Oak Lee]. Written Language & Literacy, 12(2), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.08fed Cited by2
    • Fedorova, Liudmila L. (2021). On the typology of writing systems. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 805–824). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-fedo
    • Tranter, Nicolas. (2013). Logography and layering: A functional cross-linguistic analysis. Written Language & Literacy, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.1.01tra
  • Fedorova, Liudmila L. (2012). The development of structural characteristics of Brahmi script in derivative writing systems. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1). 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.01fed Cited by2
    • Diller, Anthony. (2017). Early Thai orthography: Innovative tone-marking or recent hoax? Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00005.dil
    • Fedorova, Liudmila L. (2021). On the typology of writing systems. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 805–824). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-fedo
  • Fedorova, Liudmila L. (2021). On the typology of writing systems. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 805–824). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-fedo
  • Feigs, Wölfgang. (1986). Zur Dekodierung individueller Handschriften [On decoding handwritten texts]. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 143–154). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Feilke, Helmut. (1996). Die Entwicklung der Schreibfähigkeiten [The development of writing skills]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1178–1191). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. Cited by1
    • Antos, Gerd. (1996). Die Produktion schriftlicher Texte [The production of written texts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1527–1535). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Feilke, Helmuth, & Augst, Gerhard. (1989). Zur Ontogenese der Schreibkompetenz. In Gerd Antos & Hans P. Krings (Eds.), Textproduktion. Ein interdisziplinärer Forschungsüberblick (pp. 297–327). Tübingen. Cited by5
    • Antos, Gerd. (1996). Die Produktion schriftlicher Texte [The production of written texts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1527–1535). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Feilke, Helmut. (1996). Die Entwicklung der Schreibfähigkeiten [The development of writing skills]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1178–1191). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Molitor-Lübbert, Sylvie. (1996). Schreiben als mentaler und sprachlicher Prozeß [Writing as a mental and linguistic process]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1005–1027). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Scheerer-Neumann, Gerheid. (1996a). Der Erwerb der basalen Lese- und Schreibfertigkeiten [The acquisition of basic reading and writing skills]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1153–1169). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Weth, Constanze, & Juffermans, Kasper. (2018b). Introduction: The tyranny of writing in language and society. In Constanze Weth & Kasper Juffermans (Eds.), Tyranny of writing: Ideologies of the written word (Bloomsbury Advances in Sociolinguistics) (pp. 1–17). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Feitelson, D. (1988). Facts and fads in beginning reading: A cross-language perspective. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Cited by14
    • Foulin, Jean Noel. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2
    • Hertz-Lazarowitz, Rachel. (2004). Storybook writing in first grade. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(3), 267–299.
    • Katz, Leonard, & Feldman, Laurie B. (1996). The influence of an alphabetic writing system on the reading process. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1094–1101). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Leikin, Mark, Schwartz, Mila, & Share, David L. (2010). General and specific benefits of bi-literate bilingualism: A Russian–Hebrew study of beginning literacy [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9210-x
    • Meyler, Ann, & Breznitz, Zvia. (1998). Developmental associations between verbal and visual short-term memory and the acquisition of decoding skill. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(6), 519–540.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Share, David L., Leikin, Mark, & Kozminsky, Ely. (2008). On the benefits of bi-literacy: Just a head start in reading or specific orthographic insights? Reading and Writing, 21(9), 905–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9097-3
    • Share, David L. (2004a). Knowing letter names and learning letter sounds: A causal connection. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.03.005
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Share, David L. (2017). Learning to read Hebrew. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 155–180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Share, David, & Levin, Iris. (1999). Learning to read and write in Hebrew. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 89–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Taouk, Miriam, & Coltheart, Max. (2004). The cognitive processes involved in learning to read in Arabic [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000013831.91795.ec
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1995). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.3 [2014, Revised edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14)]
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
    • Tolchinsky, Liliana. (2010). Becoming literate in a foreign language. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 177–190). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_13
  • Feitelson, D., & Goldstein, Z. (1986). Patterns of book ownership and reading to young children in Israeli school-oriented and nonschool-oriented families. Reading Teacher, 39, 924–930. Cited by6
    • Aram, Dorit, Korat, Ofra, & Levin, Iris. (2006). Maternal mediation in a young child's writing activity: A sociocultural perspective. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 709–733). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Korat, Ofra, Klein, Pnina, & Segal-Drori, Ora. (2007). Maternal mediation in book reading, home literacy environment, and children's emergent literacy: A comparison between two social groups. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 361–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9034-x
    • Linebarger, Deborah, Piotrowski, Jessica Taylor, & Greenwood, Charles R. (2010). On-screen print: The role of captions as a supplemental literacy tool. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01407.x
    • Schiff, Rachel, & Korat, Ofra. (2006). Sociocultural factors in children's written narrative production. Written Language & Literacy, 9(2), 213–246.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Feitelson, D., Goldstein, Z., Iraqi, J., & Share, D. L. (1993). Effects of listening to story reading on aspects of literary acquisition in a diglossic situation. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 71–79. Cited by11
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim. (1998). Reading Arabic texts: Effects of text type, reader type and vowelization. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007906222227
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim. (2000). Effects of exposure to literary Arabic on reading comprehension in diglossic situation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 147–157.
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim. (2001). The role of vowels in reading Semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1/2), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008147606320
    • Farran, Lama K., Bingham, Gary E., & Matthews, Mona W. (2014). Environmental contributions to language and literacy outcomes in bilingual English-Arabic children in the U.S. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 351–379). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Korat, Ofra, Aram, Dorit, Hassunha-Arafat, Safieh, Iraki, Himat Hag-Yehiya, & Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2014). Mother-child literacy activities and early literacy in the Israeli Arab family. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 323–347). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Rosenhouse, Judith. (2014). Literacy acquisition and diglossia: Textbooks in Israeli Arabic-speaking schools. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 255–278). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3180-4
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2017). Learning to read Arabic. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 127–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, & Spolsky, Bernard. (2014). Acquiring literacy in a diglossic context: Problems and prospects. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 225–240). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Tahan, Sandy, Cline, Tony, & Messaoud-Galusi, Souhila. (2011). The relationship between language dominance and pre-reading skills in young bilingual children in Egypt [Special issue: Literacy acquisition in Arabic, edited by Abdessatar Mahfoudhi, John Everatt & Gad Elbeheri]. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 1061–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9301-3
    • Tibi, Sana, & McLeod, Lorraine. (2014). The development of young children's Arabic language and literacy in the United Arab Emirates. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 303–321). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Feldbusch, Elisabeth. (1985). Geschriebene Sprache: Untersuchungen zu ihrer Herausbildung und Grundlegung ihrer Theorie. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. Cited by18
    • Antos, Gerd. (1996). Die Produktion schriftlicher Texte [The production of written texts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1527–1535). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Augst, Gerhard, & Müller, Karin. (1996). Die schriftliche Sprache im Deutschen [Written language: German]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1500–1506). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Aust, Hugo. (1996). Die Entfaltung der Fähigkeit des Lesens [The development of reading skills]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1169–1178). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1994a). Theorie der Schriftgeschichte [Theory of the history of writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 256–264). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Ehlich, Konrad. (1994). Funktion und Struktur schriftlicher Kommunikation [Function and structure of written communication]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 18–41). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Erfurt, Jürgen. (1996). Sprachwandel und Schriftlichkeit [Language change and writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1387–1404). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Gallmann, Peter. (1996). Interpunktion [Punctuation]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1456–1467). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Günther, Hartmut. (1986). Was the alphabet discovered or invented? On the alleged common processes in speech and writing. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 248–261). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Kohrt, Manfred. (1986). The term ‘grapheme’ in the history and theory of linguistics. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphemics and orthography (pp. 80–96). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867329.80
    • Pogarell, Reiner. (1994). Schriftlichkeit und Technik [Writing and technology]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 628–635). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte. (1994). Geschichte der Reflexion über Schrift und Schriftlichkeit [History of the reflection on writing and its use]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig, (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 102–121). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110111293.1.2.102
    • Scholz, Manfred Günter. (1994). Die Entstehung volkssprachlicher Schriftkultur in Westeuropa [The evolution of vernacular literate cultures in western Europe]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 555–572). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Viollet, Catherine. (1994). Schriftlichkeit und Literatur [Writing and literature]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 658–672). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Wolff, Gerhard. (1996). Stilistik als Theorie des schriftlichen Sprachgebrauchs [Stilistics as a theory of written language usage]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1545–1558). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Feldman, C. F. (1991). Oral metalanguage. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Literacy and orality (pp. 47–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by9
    • Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [2007, Second edition]
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2009a). A theory of reading/writing: From literacy to literature. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp005
    • Olson, David R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678466
    • Olson, David R., & Oatley, Keith. (2014). The quotation theory of writing. Written Communication, 31(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515164
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Raible, Wolfgang. (1994). Orality and literacy. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 1–17). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Street, Brian V., & Lefstein, Adam. (2007). Literacy: An advanced resource book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
  • Feldman, L. B. (1991). The contribution of morphology to word recognition. Psychological Research, 53, 33–41. Cited by3
    • Casalis, Séverine, & Louis-Alexandre, Marie-France. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 303–335. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008177205648
    • Leong, Che Kan. (2000b). Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words and grades 4, 5 and 6 children's spelling [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 277–302.
    • Pollatsek, Alexander, & Lesch, Mary. (1996). The perception of words and letters. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 957–971). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Feldman, Laurie B. (1992). Morphological relationships revealed through the repetition priming task. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 239–254). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Cited by2
    • Feldman, Laurie B., & Andjelković, Darinka. (1992). Morphological analysis in word recognition. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Phonology, orthography, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 343–360). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Liu, Ying, & Peng, Dan-ling. (1997). Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 219–232). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  • Feldman, L. B. (2000). Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1431–1444. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1431 Cited by6
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, Milin, Petar, Cho, Kit W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, & O'Connor, Patrick A. (2015). Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00111
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Katherine. (2012). Morphological processing: A comparison of graded and categorical accounts. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–22). London: Psychology Press.
    • Kirby, John R., & Bowers, Peter N. (2017). Morphological instruction and literacy: Binding phonological, orthographic, and semantic features of words. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 437–461). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Schiff, Rachel, Raveh, Michal, & Kahta, Shani. (2008). The developing mental lexicon: Evidence from morphological priming of irregular Hebrew forms. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9088-4
    • Smolka, Eva, Preller, Katrin H., & Eulitz, Carsten. (2014). ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
  • Feldman, L. B. (Ed.). (1995). Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by11
    • Assink, Egbert M. H., Vooijs, Caroline, & Knuijt, Paul P. N. A. (2000). Prefixes as access units in visual word recognition: A comparison of Italian and Dutch data [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 149–168.
    • Cho, Jeung-Ryeul. (2018). Cognitive-linguistic skills and reading and writing in Korean Hangul, Chinese Hanja, and English among Korean children. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 391–410). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Cossu, Giuseppe. (1999b). Biological constraints on literacy acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 213–237.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2004). Modeling the Japanese mental lexicon: Morphological, orthographic and phonological considerations. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in Psychological Research: Volume 31 (pp. 27–61). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Leong, Che Kan. (2000b). Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words and grades 4, 5 and 6 children's spelling [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 277–302.
    • Mann, Virginia A. (2000). Introduction to special issue on morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 143–147.
    • Masuda, Hisashi, & Joyce, Terry. (2005). A database of two-kanji compound words featuring morphological family, morphological structure, and semantic category data. In Katsuo Tamaoka, (Ed.), Corpus studies on Japanese kanji (Glottometrics 10) (pp. 30–44). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo; Lüdenschied, Germany: RAM-Verlag.
    • Masuda, Hisashi, & Joyce, Terry. (2018). Constituent-priming investigations of the morphological activation of Japanese compound words. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 221–244). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Müller, Kurt, & Brady, Susan. (2001). Correlates of early reading performance in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 757–799.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2003a). Bilingual oral reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of Arabic/Hebrew (L1) - English (L2) readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(8), 717–736.
  • Feldman, Laurie B., & Andjelković, Darinka. (1992). Morphological analysis in word recognition. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Phonology, orthography, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 343–360). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. Cited by5
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Kahn-Horwitz, Janina, Shimron, Joseph, & Sparks, Richard L. (2005). Predicting foreign language reading achievement in elementary school students. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 527–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3179-x
    • Liu, Ying, & Peng, Dan-ling. (1997). Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 219–232). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Lyster, Solveig-Alma Halaas. (2002). The effects of morphological versus phonological awareness training in kindergarten on reading development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 261–294. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015272516220
    • Pae, Hye K., Bae, Sungbong, & Yi, Kwangoh. (2019). More than an alphabet: Linguistic features of Korean and their influences on Hangul word recognition [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00027.pae
  • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Barac-Cikoja, Dragana. (1996). Serbo-Croatian: A biscriptal language. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 769–772). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by2
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Kemp, Nenagh. (2010). Texting versus txtng: Reading and writing text messages, and links with other linguistic skills. Writing Systems Research, 2(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq002
  • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Basnight-Brown, Dana M. (2008). The role of morphology in visual word recognition: Graded semantic influences due to competing senses and semantic richness of the stem. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 85–106). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Feldman, L. B., Frost, R., & Pnini, T. (1995). Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: Evidence from English and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 947–960. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.947 Cited by8
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Koda, Keiko, & Miller, Ryan T. (2018). Cross-linguistic interactions in L2 word meaning inference in English as a foreign language. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 293–312). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Liu, Ying, & Peng, Dan-ling. (1997). Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 219–232). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Llaurado, Anna, & Tolchinsky, Liliana. (2016). The developmental pattern of spelling in Catalan from first to fifth school grade. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.1000812
    • Shimron, Joseph. (1999). The role of vowel signs in Hebrew: Beyond word recognition [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008045316692
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, & Carlisle, Joanne F. (2006). Introduction to the special issue: Morphology in word identification and word spelling [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9010-5
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, & Perfetti, Charles. (2017). Introduction: Operating principles in learning to read. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Geva, Esther. (1999). Processing inflected morphology in second language word recognition: Russian-speakers and English-speakers read Hebrew [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 321–343.
  • Feldman, Laurie Beth, Milin, Petar, Cho, Kit W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, & O'Connor, Patrick A. (2015). Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00111
  • Feldman, L. B., & Moskovljević, J. (1987). Repetition priming is not purely episodic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 573–581. Cited by4
    • Feldman, Laurie B. (1992). Morphological relationships revealed through the repetition priming task. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 239–254). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Feldman, Laurie B., & Andjelković, Darinka. (1992). Morphological analysis in word recognition. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Phonology, orthography, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 343–360). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Barac-Cikoja, Dragana. (1996). Serbo-Croatian: A biscriptal language. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 769–772). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Park, Kwonsaeng, & Vaid, Jyotsna. (1995). Lexical representation of script variation: Evidence from Korean biscriptals. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and cognition 7) (pp. 327–339). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Feldman, L. B., O'Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F. (2009). Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 684–691. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.684 Cited by8
    • Andrews, Sally. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Casalis, Séverine, Commissaire, Eva, & Duncan, Lynne G. (2015). Sensitivity to morpheme units in English as L2 word recognition [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.976165
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, Milin, Petar, Cho, Kit W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, & O'Connor, Patrick A. (2015). Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00111
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Katherine. (2012). Morphological processing: A comparison of graded and categorical accounts. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–22). London: Psychology Press.
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Ko, In Yeong. (2018). The time course of activation of semantic and orthographic information in morphological decomposition by Korean adults and developing readers. Frontiers in Communication, 3:51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00051
    • Smolka, Eva, Preller, Katrin H., & Eulitz, Carsten. (2014). ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
    • Taft, Marcus. (2015). The nature of lexical representation in visual word recognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 99–113). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Balota, David A. (2015). Visual word recognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 26–43). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. T. (1997). The role of component function in visual recognition of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(3), 776–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.3.776 Cited by8
    • Chung, Kevin K. H., Ho, Connie S.-H., Chan, David W., Tsang, Suk-Man, & Lee, Suk-Han. (2011). Cognitive skills and literacy performance of Chinese adolescents with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 835–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9227-1
    • Han, Buxin. (2002). Frequency and position effects of component combination in Chinese character recognition. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 207–223). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Kalindi, Sylvia Chanda, Chung, Kevin Kien Hoa, Liu, Duo Phil, & Wang, Li-Chih Angus. (2018). The complexities of written Chinese and the cognitive-linguistic precursors to reading, with consequent implications for reading interventions. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 99–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Lü, Chan, Koda, Keiko, Zhang, Dongbu, & Zhang, Yanhui. (2015). Effects of semantic radical properties on character meaning extraction and inference among learners of Chinese as a foreign language [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.955076
    • Luo, Yang C., Chen, Xi., Deacon, S. Hélène, & Li, Hong. (2011). Development of Chinese orthographic processing: A cross-cultural perspective [Special issue: Linguistic and cognitive factors in reading Chinese, edited by Xi Chen & Yang C. Luo]. Writing Systems Research, 3(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr008
    • Myers, James. (2019). The grammar of Chinese characters: Productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthograhic system (Routledge Studies in East Asian Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1999b). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837.
  • Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. T. (1999a). Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 559–576. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2629 Cited by6
    • Handel, Zev. (2015). Logography and the classification of writing systems: A response to Unger. Scripta, 7, 109–150.
    • Lü, Chan, Koda, Keiko, Zhang, Dongbu, & Zhang, Yanhui. (2015). Effects of semantic radical properties on character meaning extraction and inference among learners of Chinese as a foreign language [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.955076
    • Myers, James. (2019). The grammar of Chinese characters: Productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthograhic system (Routledge Studies in East Asian Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Myers, James. (2021). Levels of structure within Chinese character constituents. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 645–681). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-myer
    • Su, Yi-Fen, & Samuels, S. Jay. (2010). Developmental changes in character-complexity and word-length effects when reading Chinese script. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1085–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9197-3
    • Williams, Clay, & Bever, Thomas. (2010). Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias? Reading and Writing, 23(5), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9228-0
  • Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. T. (1999b). Semantic radicals in phonetic compounds: Implications for visual character recognition in Chinese. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H.C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 19–36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by9
    • Cheng, Chao-Ming, & Lan, Ying-Hsiang. (2011). An implicit test of Chinese orthographic satiation. Reading and Writing, 24(1), 55–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9201-y
    • Chung, Kevin K. H., Ho, Connie S.-H., Chan, David W., Tsang, Suk-Man, & Lee, Suk-Han. (2011). Cognitive skills and literacy performance of Chinese adolescents with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 835–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9227-1
    • Handel, Zev. (2015). Logography and the classification of writing systems: A response to Unger. Scripta, 7, 109–150.
    • Ho, Connie Suk-Han, Wong, Yau-Kai, Yeung, Pui-Sze, Chan, David Wai-ock, Chung, Kevin Kien-Hoa, Lo, Sau-Ching, & Luan, Hui. (2012). The core components of reading instruction in Chinese. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 857–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9303-1
    • Leong, Che-Kan. (2002a). ‘Cognitive conjunction’ analysis of processing Chinese. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 1–31). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Pak, Ada K. H., Cheng-Lai, Alice, Tso, Ivy F., Shu, Hua, Lia, Wenling, & Anderson, Richard C. (2005). Visual chunking skills of Hong Kong children. Reading and Writing, 18(5), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-6575-3
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
    • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1999b). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837.
  • Feldman, L. B., & Soltano, E. G. (1999). Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain and Language, 68, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2077 Cited by6
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Basnight-Brown, Dana M. (2008). The role of morphology in visual word recognition: Graded semantic influences due to competing senses and semantic richness of the stem. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 85–106). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, Milin, Petar, Cho, Kit W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, & O'Connor, Patrick A. (2015). Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00111
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Katherine. (2012). Morphological processing: A comparison of graded and categorical accounts. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–22). London: Psychology Press.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2004). Modeling the Japanese mental lexicon: Morphological, orthographic and phonological considerations. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in Psychological Research: Volume 31 (pp. 27–61). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Ko, In Yeong. (2018). The time course of activation of semantic and orthographic information in morphological decomposition by Korean adults and developing readers. Frontiers in Communication, 3:51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00051
    • Sibley, Daragh E., & Kello, Christopher T. (2012). Learned orthographic representations facilitates large-scale modeling of word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 28–51). London: Psychology Press.
  • Feldman, L. B., & Turvey, M. T. (1980). Words written in kana are named faster than the same words written in kanji. Language and Speech, 23, 141–147. Cited by11
    • Hoosain, Rumjahn. (1995). Getting at the sound and meaning of logographic and alphabetic scripts. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 131–144). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Kess, Joseph F., & Miyamoto, Tadao. (1999). The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Kinoshita, Sachiko. (1998). The role of phonology in reading Japanese: Or why I don't hear myself when reading Japanese [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 439–455. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 285–301). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Paradis, Michel, Hagiwara, Hiroko, & Hildebrandt, Nancy. (1985). Neurolinguistic aspects of the Japanese writing system (Perspectives in Neurolinguistics, Neuropsychology, and Psycholinguistics). Tokyo; Orlando, FL; London: Academic Press.
    • Sasaki, Miho. (2005). The effect of L1 reading processes on L2: A crosslinguistic comparison of Italian and Japanese users of English. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (289–308). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo, & Hatsuzuka, Makiko. (1998). The effects of morphological semantics on the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 293–322. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 139–168). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Tzeng, Ovid J. L., Hung, Daisy L., Lee, Wei Ling, & Chang, Ji-Mei. (1996). Cross-Linguistic analyses of basic reading processes. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1101–1117). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Yamada, Jun. (1998). The time course of semantic and phonological access in naming kanji and kana words [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008095920749 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 271–283). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Yamada, Jun, & Leong, Che Kan. (2005). Differential reading, naming, and transcribing speeds of Japanese romaji and hiragana. Reading and Writing, 18(4), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3356-y
  • Feldman, L. B., & Turvey, M. T. (1983). Word recognition in Serbo-Croatian is phonologically analytic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 228–298. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.9.2.288 Cited by17
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Buchanan, Lori, & Besner, Derek. (1993). Reading aloud: Evidence for the use of whole word nonsemantic pathway. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 133–152. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 5–24). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Carello, Claudia, & Turvey, M. T., Lukatela, Georgije. (1992). Can theories of word recognition remain stubbornly nonphonological? In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 211–226). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Barac-Cikoja, Dragana. (1996). Serbo-Croatian: A biscriptal language. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 769–772). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Frost, Ram. (1992). Orthography and phonology: The psychological reality of orthographic depth. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 255–274). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Geva, Esther, Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Shany, Michal. (1997). Development of reading efficiency in first and second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_2
    • Hansen, Gunna Funder. (2014). Word recognition in Arabic: Approaching a language-specific reading model. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 55–76). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Katz, Leonard, & Frost, Ram. (1992b). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62789-2
    • Leong, Che Kan. (1995). Orthographic and psycholinguistic considerations in developing literacy in Chinese. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 163–183). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Perfetti, Charles A., Zhang, Sulan, & Berent, Iris. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a “universal” phonological principle. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62798-3
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [1987, Reprinted with corrections; 2015, Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing]
    • Schmalz, Xenia, Marinus, Eva, Coltheart, Max, & Castles, Anne. (2015). Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1614–1629. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0835-2
    • Seidenberg, M. S. (1992a). Beyond orthographic depth: Equitable division of labor. In R. Frost & K. Katz (Eds.), Orthography; phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 85–118). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Wu, Jei-Tun, & Liu, In-Mao. (1997). Phonological activation in pronouncing characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 47–64). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Katherine. (2012). Morphological processing: A comparison of graded and categorical accounts. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–22). London: Psychology Press.
  • Felici, James. (2003). The complete manual of typography: A guide to setting perfect type. Berkeley, CA: Adobe Press. [2012, Second edition] Cited by3
    • Cullen, Kristin. (2012). Design elements, typography fundamentals: A graphic style manual for understanding how typography affects design. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
    • Haley, Allan, Poulin, Richard, Tselentis, Jason, Seddon, Tony, Leonidas, Gerry, Saltz, & Ina, Henderson, Kathryn, with Alterman, Tyler. (2012). Typography, referenced: A comprehensive visual guide to the language, history, and practice of typography. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
    • Strizver, Ilene. (2006). Type rules! The designer's guide to professional typography (Second edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Felton, R. H., & Brown, I. S. (1990). Phonological processes as predictors of specific reading skills in children at risk for reading failure. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 39–59. Cited by10
    • Anthony, Jason L., Williams, Jeffrey M., Aghara, Rachel G., Dunkelberger, Martha, Novak, Barbara, & Mukherjee, Anuja Divatia. (2010). Assessment of individual differences in phonological representation. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 969–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9185-7
    • Bowers, Patricia G., & Newby-Clark, Elissa. (2002). The role of naming speed within a model of reading acquisition [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 109–126.
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Chiappe, Penny, Stringer, Ron, Siegel, Linda S., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2002). Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 73–107.
    • Cutting, Laurie E., & Denckla, Martha Bridge. (2001). The relationship of rapid serial naming and word reading in normally developing readers: An exploratory model. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 673–705.
    • Morfidi, Eleni, van der Leij, Aryan, de Jong, Peter F., Scheltinga, Femke, & Bekebrede, Judith. (2007). Reading in two orthographies: A cross-linguistic study of Dutch average and poor readers who learn English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 753–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9035-9
    • Nakamoto, Jonathan, Lindsey, Kim A., & Manis, Franklin R. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of English language learners' word decoding and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 20(7), 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9045-7
    • Savage, Robert. (2004). Motor skills, automaticity and developmental dyslexia: A review of the research literature. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(3), 301–324.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Torgesen, Joseph K., Wagner, Richard K., Rashotte, Carol A., Burgess, Stephen, & Hecht, Stephen. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second-to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_4
  • Felton, R. H., Naylor, C. E., & Wood, F. B. (1990). Neuropsychological profile of adult dyslexics. Brain and Language, 39, 485–497. Cited by10
    • Barr, Cathy L., & Couto, Jillian M. (2008). Molecular genetics of reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 255–281). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Chung, Kevin K. H., Ho, Connie S.-H., Chan, David W., Tsang, Suk-Man, & Lee, Suk-Han. (2011). Cognitive skills and literacy performance of Chinese adolescents with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 835–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9227-1
    • Cutting, Laurie E., & Denckla, Martha Bridge. (2001). The relationship of rapid serial naming and word reading in normally developing readers: An exploratory model. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 673–705.
    • Leinonen, Seija, Müller, Kurt, Leppänen, Paavo H. T., Aro, Mikko, Ahonen, Timo, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2001). Heterogeneity in adult dyslexic readers: Relating processing skills to the speed and accuracy of oral text reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 265–296.
    • Liao, Chen-Huei, Georgiou, George K., & Parrila, Rauno. (2008). Rapid naming speed and Chinese character recognition. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9071-0
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Samuelsson, Stefan, Gustavsson, Ann, Herkner, Birgitta, & Lundberg, Ingvar. (2000). Is the frequency of dyslexic problems among prison inmates higher than in a normal population? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 297–312.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
  • Felton, R. H. & Wood, F. B. (1989). Cognitive deficits in reading disability and attention deficit disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 3–13. Cited by3
    • Hecht, Steven A., Burgess, Stephen R., Torgesen, Joseph K., Wagner, Richard K., & Rashotte, Carol A. (2000). Explaining social class differences in growth of reading skills from beginning kindergarten through fourth-grade: The role of phonological awareness, rate of access, and print knowledge. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 99–127.
    • Leinonen, Seija, Müller, Kurt, Leppänen, Paavo H. T., Aro, Mikko, Ahonen, Timo, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2001). Heterogeneity in adult dyslexic readers: Relating processing skills to the speed and accuracy of oral text reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 265–296.
    • Wolf, Maryanne, O'Rourke, Alyssa Goldberg, Gidney, Calvin, Lovett, Maureen, Cirino, Paul, & Morris, Robin. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013816320290
  • Felton, R. H., & Wood, F. R. (1992). A reading level match study of nonword reading skills in poor readers with varying IQs. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 318–326. Cited by5
    • Chiappe, Penny, Stringer, Ron, Siegel, Linda S., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2002). Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 73–107.
    • Hart, Lesley, & Perfetti, Charles. (2008). Learning words in Zekkish: Implications for understanding lexical representation. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 107–128). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Share, David L., & Shalev, Carmit. (2004). Self-teaching in normal and disabled readers [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 769–800.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Stringer, Ron, & Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). The connection between reaction time and variation in reading ability: Unravelling covariance relationships with cognitive ability and phonological sensitivity. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(1), 41–53.
  • Fendel, Victoria. (2021). A small step for a man, a giant leap for a aeople—The Coptic language. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 775–786). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-fend
  • Feng, G. (2006). Eye movements as time-series random variables: A stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 70–95. Cited by5
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, Reichle, Erik D., & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Cognitive processes in reading: The E-Z Reader model of eyemovement control. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 122–148). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Reichle, Erik D., & Sheridan, Heather. (2015). E-Z reader: An overview of the model and two recent applications. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 277–290). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2015). The work of the eyes during reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 44–59). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • White, Sarah J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.205
  • Feng, Zhiwei, & Yin, Binyong. (2000). The Chinese digraphia problem in the information age [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 229–234. Cited by1
    • Husmann, Lisa E. (2002). [Book review: John E. Ingulsrud & Kate Allen, (1999), Learning to read in China: Sociolinguistic perspectives on the acquisition of literary]. Written Language & Literacy, 5(2), 291–296.
  • Fenoglio, Irène. (2015). From writing under production to the finished product: A processual threshold. In Georgeta Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface (pp. 127–150). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.07fen
  • Feraudi-Gruénais, Francisca. (2017). Das synaktive Potential von Beischriften. In Irene Berti, Katharina Bolle, Fanny Opdenhoff, & Fabian Stroth (Eds.), Writing matters: Presenting and perceiving monumental inscriptions in antiquity and the middle ages (Materiale Textkulturen 14) (pp. 43–76). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110534597-004
  • Ferguson, Charles A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15(2), 325–340. [1972, Reprinted, in Giglioli, Pier Paolo (Ed.), Language and social context (pp. 232–251). Harmondsworth, Penguin] Cited by60
    • Abdelhadi, Souad, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Eviatar, Zohar. (2011). Perceptual load in the reading of Arabic: Effects of orthographic visual complexity on detection. Writing Systems Research, 3(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr014
    • Abu Elhija, Dua'a. (2014). A new writing system? Developing orthographies for writing Arabic dialects in electronic media. Writing Systems Research, 6(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.868334
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim. (2000). Effects of exposure to literary Arabic on reading comprehension in diglossic situation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 147–157.
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, Share, David, & Mansour, Maysaloon Said. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(5), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024237415143
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, & Taha, Haitham. (2006b). Reading in Arabic orthography: Characteristics, research findings, and assessment. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron, (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 321–338). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A., Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Khateb, Asaid. (2017). What contributes to spelling in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218748
    • Bauer, Thomas. (1996c). Die schriftliche Sprache im Arabischen [Written language: Arabic]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1483–1490). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Böhm, Manuela. (2018). The tyranny of orthography: Multilingualism and Frenchification at primary schools in late-nineteenth-century France. In Constanze Weth & Kasper Juffermans (Eds.), Tyranny of writing: Ideologies of the written word (Bloomsbury advances in sociolinguistics) (pp. 64–80). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    • Böhm, Manuela, & Mehlem, Ulrich. (2020). What is a word? Word segmentation in multilingual writers writing French and Moroccan Arabic [Special issue: Literacies in contact, edited by Constanze Weth & Manuela Böhm, in collaboration Daniel Bunčić]. Written Language & Literacy, 23(2), 154–179. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00038.boh
    • Bondarev, Dmitry. (2013). Language change induced by written codes: A case of Old Kanembu and Kanuri dialects. In Esther-Miriam Wagner, Ben Outhwaite, & Bettina Beinhoff (Eds.), Scribes as agents of language change (Studies in Language Change 10) (pp. 291–323). Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1994b). Schriftlichkeit und Diglossie [Writing and diglossia]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 739–745). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Dai, Jumana, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Share, David L. (2013). The influence of orthographic structure on printed word learning in Arabic. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.827563
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag]
    • Elti di Rodeano, Sveva. (2019). Digraphia: The story of a sociolinguistic typology. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 111–126). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-elti
    • Eviatar, Zohar, & Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2014). Why is it hard to read Arabic? In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 77–96). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Farran, Lama K., Bingham, Gary E., & Matthews, Mona W. (2014). Environmental contributions to language and literacy outcomes in bilingual English-Arabic children in the U.S. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 351–379). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Handel, Zev. (2019). Sinography: The borrowing and adaptation of the Chinese script (Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis 1). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352223
    • Høigilt, Jacob, & Mejdell, Gunvor. (2017). Introduction. In Jacob Høigilt & Gunvor Mejdell (Eds.), The politics of written language in the Arab world: Writing change (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 90) (pp. 1–17). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2006). Morpho-Phonemic similarity within and between languages: A factor to be considered in processing Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9009-y
    • Karolij, Edeltraud, & Nehr, Monika. (1996). Schriftspracherwerb unter Bedingungen der Mehrsprachigkeit [Acquisition of written language under conditions of multilingualism]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1191–1205). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Khamis-Dakwar, Reem, & Makhoul, Baha. (2014). The development of ADAT (Arabic Diglossic Knowledge and Awareness Test): A theoretical and clinical overview. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 279–300). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Khateb, Asaid, Taha, Haitham Y., Elias, Inas, & Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2013). The effect of the internal orthographic connectivity of written Arabic words on the process of the visual recognition: A comparison between skilled and dyslexic readers [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.834244
    • Koch, Peter, & Oesterreicher, Wulf. (1994). Schriftlichkeit und Sprache [Writing and language]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 587–604). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Kornicki, Peter Francis. (2018). Languages, scripts, and Chinese texts in East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198797821.001
    • Laks, Lior, & Berman, Ruth A. (2014). A new look at diglossia: Modality-driven distinctions between spoken and written narratives in Jordanian Arabic. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 241–254). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Linell, Per. (1982). The written language bias in linguistics (Studies in Comrnunication 2). Linköping: Linköping University.
    • Ludwig, Ralph. (1996). Die schriftliche Sprache im Französischen [Written language: French]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1491–1495). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Mbodj-Pouye, Aïssatou, & Van den Avenne, Cécile. (2012). Vernacular literacy practices in present-day Mali: Combining ethnography and textual analysis to understand multilingual texts. In Mark Sebba, Shahrzad Mahootian, & Carla Jonsson (Eds.), Language mixing and code-switching in writing: Approaches to mixed-language written discourse (Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism 2) (pp. 170–191). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Mohamed, Wessam, Landerl, Karin, & Elbert, Thomas. (2014). An epidemiological survey of specific reading and spelling disabilities in Arabic speaking children in Egypt. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 99–117). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Myhill, John. (2014). The effect of diglossia on literacy in Arabic and other languages. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 197–223). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Ravid, Dorit, Naoum, Dina, & Nasser, Suheir. (2014). Narrative development in Arabic: Story re-telling. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 153–170). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Roberts, David. (2018). [Book review: Dyck, Carrie, Granadillo, Tania, Rice, Keren, & Labrada, Jorge Emilio Rosés, (2014), Dialogue on dialect standardization]. Writing Systems Research, 10(1), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2018.1491440
    • Rosenhouse, Judith. (2014). Literacy acquisition and diglossia: Textbooks in Israeli Arabic-speaking schools. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 255–278). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Russak, Susie, & Fragman, Alon. (2014). The development of grapho-phonemic representations among native Hebrew speakers learning Arabic as a foreign language. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 381–393). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2003a). Bilingual oral reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of Arabic/Hebrew (L1) - English (L2) readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(8), 717–736.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3180-4
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2017). Learning to read Arabic. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 127–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, & Henkin-Roitfarbm Roni. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, & Spolsky, Bernard. (2014). Acquiring literacy in a diglossic context: Problems and prospects. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 225–240). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Schiegg, Markus. (2013). Medieval glossators as agents of language change. In Esther-Miriam Wagner, Ben Outhwaite, & Bettina Beinhoff (Eds.), Scribes as agents of language change (Studies in Language Change 10) (pp. 39–69). Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter.
    • Sebba, Mark. (2007). Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486739
    • Sebba, Mark. (2016). The orthography of English-lexicon pidgins and creoles. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 347–364). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Share, David L. & Daniels, Peter T. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
    • Stine, Philip C. (1994). Writing and religion. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 604–610). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Stubbs, Michael. (1980). Language and literacy: The sociolinguistics of reading and writing. London; Boston; Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    • Taouk, Miriam, & Coltheart, Max. (2004). The cognitive processes involved in learning to read in Arabic [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000013831.91795.ec
    • Thonhauser, Ingo. (2003). “Written language but easily to use!”: Perceptions of continuity and discontinuity between written/oral modes in the Lebanese context of biliteracy and diglossia. Written Language & Literacy, 6(1), 93–110.
    • Tibi, Sana, Joshi, R. Malatesha, & McLeod, Lorraine. (2013). Emergent writing of young children in the United Arab Emirates. Written Language & Literacy, 16(1), 77–105. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.1.04tib
    • Tibi, Sana, & McLeod, Lorraine. (2014). The development of young children's Arabic language and literacy in the United Arab Emirates. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 303–321). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Unseth, Peter. (2005). Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns
    • Weth, Constanze, Böhm, Manuela, & Bunčić, Daniel. (2020). Literacies in contact: Forms, functions, and practices [Special issue: Literacies in contact, edited by Constanze Weth & Manuela Böhm, in collaboration Daniel Bunčić]. Written Language & Literacy, 23(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00037.wet
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ferguson, Daniel, Kato, Yasuhiko, & Nagahiro, Mariko. (2012). Miscues and eye movements of Japanese beginner readers. In Ken Goodman, Shaomei Wang, Mieko Shimizu Iventosch, & Yetta Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 127–143). New York; London: Routledge.
  • Ferguson, W. Craig. (1989). Pica Roman type in Elizabethan England. Aldershot: Scolar Press.
  • Fernandes, Sandra, Ventura, Paulo, Querido, Luís, & Morais, José (2008). Reading and spelling acquisition in European Portuguese: A preliminary study. Reading and Writing, 21(8), 805–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9093-7 Cited by5
    • Sucena, Ana, Castro, São Luís, & Seymour, Philip. (2009). Developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth: The case of European Portuguese [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9156-4
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Winskel, Heather, & Iemwanthong, Kanyarat. (2010). Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1021–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9194-6
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Winskel, Heather, & Ratitamkul, Theeraporn. (2019). Learning to read and write in Thai. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 217–231). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_12
  • Fern-Pollak, Liory, & Masterson, Jackie. (2016). Dyslexia and the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 223–233). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Ferrand, L. (2000). Reading aloud polysyllabic words and nonwords: The syllabic length effect reexamined. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7(1), 142–148. Cited by5
    • Ashby, Jane. (2016). Why does prosody accompany fluency? Re-conceptualizing the role of phonology in reading. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 65–89). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_5
    • Bijeljac-Babic, Ranka, Millogo, Victor, Farioli, Fernand, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). A developmental investigation of word length effects in reading using a new on-line word identification paradigm. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(4), 411–431.
    • Paizi, Despina, Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, & Burani, Cristina. (2010). Lexical reading in Italian developmental dyslexic readers. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 181–198). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Simpson, Greg B., & Kang, Hyewon. (2004). Syllable processing in alphabetic Korean [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000013808.65933.a1
    • Su, Yi-Fen, & Samuels, S. Jay. (2010). Developmental changes in character-complexity and word-length effects when reading Chinese script. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1085–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9197-3
  • Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A(3), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724989208250619 Cited by14
    • Álvarez, Carlos J., Carreiras, Manuel, & Perea, Manuel. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000242 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 98–123). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Bedoin, Nathalie, & dos Santos, Christophe. (2008). How do consonant feature values affect the processing of a CVCV structure? Evidence from a reading task [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.05bed
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). Sublexical representations and the ‘front end’ of visual word recognition [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000288 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 1–10). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Grainger, Jonathan. (1992). Orthographic neighborhoods and visual word recognition. In Ram Frost and Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 131–146). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Morais, José. (2003). Levels of phonological representation in skilled reading and in learning to read [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 123–151.
    • Morita, Aiko, & Tamaoka, Katsuo. (2002). Phonological involvement in the processing of Japanese at the lexical and sentence levels. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 633–651.
    • Perfetti, Charles A., Zhang, Sulan, & Berent, Iris. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a “universal” phonological principle. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62798-3
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2019). EPS mid-career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819829696
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
  • Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1993). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 119–122. Cited by9
    • Álvarez, Carlos J., Carreiras, Manuel, & Perea, Manuel. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000242 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 98–123). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Berent, Iris, & Van Orden, Guy C. (2000). Homophone dominance modulates the phonemic-masking effect. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 133–167.
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Chetail, Fabienne, & Mathey, Stéphanie. (2009). The syllable frequency effect in visual recognition of French words: A study in skilled and beginning readers. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 955–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9135-9
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rao, Chaitra, Vaid, Jyotsna, Srinivasan, Narayanan, & Chen, Hsin-Chin. (2011). Orthographic characteristics speed Hindi word naming but slow Urdu naming: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu biliterates [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9256-9
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Van Heuven, Walter J. B. (2005). Bilingual interactive activation models of word recognition in a second language. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (260–288). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
  • Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A47(2), 365–382. Cited by11
    • Álvarez, Carlos J., Carreiras, Manuel, & Perea, Manuel. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000242 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 98–123). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Berent, Iris, & Van Orden, Guy C. (2000). Homophone dominance modulates the phonemic-masking effect. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 133–167.
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Carreiras, Manuel, Armstrong, Blair C., Perea, Manuel, & Frost, Ram. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005
    • Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). Sublexical representations and the ‘front end’ of visual word recognition [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000288 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 1–10). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Halderman, Laura K., Ashby, Jane, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2012). Phonology: An early and integral role in identifying words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 207–228). London: Psychology Press.
    • Rao, Chaitra, Vaid, Jyotsna, Srinivasan, Narayanan, & Chen, Hsin-Chin. (2011). Orthographic characteristics speed Hindi word naming but slow Urdu naming: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu biliterates [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9256-9
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
  • Ferrand, L., & New, B. (2003). Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming. Acta Psychologica, 113(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(03)00031-3 Cited by7
    • Ashby, Jane. (2016). Why does prosody accompany fluency? Re-conceptualizing the role of phonology in reading. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 65–89). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_5
    • Cahill, Lynne, & Joyce, Terry. (2017). Introduction: Orthographic databases and lexicons [Special issue: Orthographic databases and lexicons, edited by Lynne Cahill & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 20(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.20.1.01cah
    • Conrad, Markus, & Jacobs, Arthur M. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000224 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 44–64). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Matsumoto, Mallory E. (2017). From sound to symbol: Orthographic semantization in Maya hieroglyphic writing. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1335634
    • Pae, Hye K., Kim, Sun-A, Mano, Quintino R., & Wang, Min. (2018). Crosslinguistic influences of script format: L1-derived syllabification in reading L2 English among native Korean readers. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 353–372). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Sulpizio, Simone, Spinelli, Giacomo, & Burani, Cristina. (2017). STRESYL: An Italian Stress-in-Syllables database for reading research [Special issue: Orthographic databases and lexicons, edited by Lynne Cahill & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 20(1), 80–103. doi 10.1075/wll.20.1.05sul
  • Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., & Pallier, C. (2000). The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 488–496. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.488 Cited by5
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., Hutchinson, Keith A., & Cortese, Michael J. (2012). Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 90–115). London: Psychology Press.
    • Kinoshita, Sachiko. (2015). Visual word recognition in the Bayesian reader framework. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 63–75). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Norris, Dennis. (2013). Models of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.003
    • Snell, Joshua, Vitu, Françoise, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2017). Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: Beyond the sub-lexical level? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(10), 1984–1996. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1217247
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Balota, David A. (2015). Visual word recognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 26–43). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Memory & Language, 35, 708–723. Cited by6
    • Álvarez, Carlos J., Carreiras, Manuel, & Perea, Manuel. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000242 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 98–123). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Daigle, Daniel, & Armand, Françoise. (2008). Phonological sensitivity in severely and profoundly deaf readers of French. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9087-5
    • Gutiérrez-Palma, Nicolás, & Palma-Reyes, Alfonso. (2008). On the use of lexical stress in reading Spanish. Reading and Writing, 21(6), 645–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9082-x
    • Lambert, Eric, Kandel, Sonia, Fayol, Michel, & Espéret, Eric. (2008). The effect of the number of syllables on handwriting production. Reading and Writing, 21(9), 859–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9095-5
    • Macizo, Pedro, & Van Petten, Cyma. (2007). Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 295–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9032-z
    • Will, Udo, Nottbusch, Guido, & Weingarten, Rüdiger. (2006). Linguistic units in word typing: Effects of word presentation modes and typing delay [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.10wil
  • Ferrara, S. (2012). Cypro-Minoan inscriptions, Volume I: Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by11
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2013). A linguistic history of Ancient Cyprus: The non-Greek languages, and their relations with Greek, c.1600–300 BC (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2017b). The other pre-alphabetic scripts of Crete and Cyprus. In Yannis Galanakis, Anastasia Christophilopoulou & James Grime (Eds.), Codebreakers and groundbreakers (pp. 45–53). Cambridge: The Fitzwilliam Museum.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2017c). Writing «systems»: Literacy and the transmission of writing in nonadministrative contexts. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 153–172). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2019). Writing and society in ancient Cyprus (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316729977
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2020a). Material entanglements of writing practices in the Bronze Age Aegean and Cyprus. Sustainability, 12, 10671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410671
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2013). Syllabic writing on Cyprus and its context (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Valério, Miguel, & Davis, Brent. (2017). Cypro-Minoan in marking systems of the Eastern and Central Mediterranean: New methods of investigating old questions. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 132–152). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  • Ferrara, S. (2013a). Cypro-Minoan inscriptions, Volume 2: Corpus. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by9
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2013). A linguistic history of Ancient Cyprus: The non-Greek languages, and their relations with Greek, c.1600–300 BC (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2017b). The other pre-alphabetic scripts of Crete and Cyprus. In Yannis Galanakis, Anastasia Christophilopoulou & James Grime (Eds.), Codebreakers and groundbreakers (pp. 45–53). Cambridge: The Fitzwilliam Museum.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2017c). Writing «systems»: Literacy and the transmission of writing in nonadministrative contexts. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 153–172). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2019). Writing and society in ancient Cyprus (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316729977
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2020a). Material entanglements of writing practices in the Bronze Age Aegean and Cyprus. Sustainability, 12, 10671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410671
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2013). Syllabic writing on Cyprus and its context (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Valério, Miguel, & Davis, Brent. (2017). Cypro-Minoan in marking systems of the Eastern and Central Mediterranean: New methods of investigating old questions. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 132–152). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  • Ferrara, Silvia. (2013b). Writing in Cypro-Minoan: One script, too many? In Philippa M. Steele (Ed.), Syllabic writing on Cyprus and its context (Cambridge Classical Studies) (pp. 49–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by7
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Judson, Anna P. (2020b). The undeciphered signs of Linear B: Interpretation and scribal practices (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859745
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2013). A linguistic history of Ancient Cyprus: The non-Greek languages, and their relations with Greek, c.1600–300 BC (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2017c). Writing «systems»: Literacy and the transmission of writing in nonadministrative contexts. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 153–172). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2019). Writing and society in ancient Cyprus (Cambridge Classical Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316729977
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Valério, Miguel, & Davis, Brent. (2017). Cypro-Minoan in marking systems of the Eastern and Central Mediterranean: New methods of investigating old questions. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 132–152). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  • Ferrara, Silvia. (2017a). Another beginning's end: Secondary script formation in the Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean. In Philippa M. Steele (Ed.). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems (pp. 7–32). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books. Cited by3
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Ferrara, Silvia, & Jasink, Anna Margherita. (2017). To have and to hold: Hieroglyphic seals as personal markers and objects of display. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 41–53). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  • Ferrara, Silvia. (2020). A ‘top-down’ re-invention of an old form: Cuneiform alphabets in context. In Philip J. Boyes, & Philippa M. Steele (Eds.), Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1) (pp. 15–28). Oxbow; Philadelpia: Oxbow Books. Cited by1
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
  • Ferrara, Silvia, & Jasink, Anna Margherita. (2017). To have and to hold: Hieroglyphic seals as personal markers and objects of display. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 41–53). Firenze: Firenze University Press. Cited by1
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
  • Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348–368. Cited by7
    • Ferreira, Fernanda, & Henderson, John M. (1993). Reading processes during syntactic analysis and reanalysis. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 247–275. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 119–147). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Inhoff, Albrecht W., & Rayner, Keith. (1996). Das Blickverhalten beim Lesen [Eye movements during reading]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 942–957). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Liu, In-Mao. (1998). A slot-filling model of sentence comprehension [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 255–266. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 101–112). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Spivey-Knowlton, Michael J., Trueswell, John C., & Tanenhaus, Michael K. (1995). Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: Discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. In John M. Henderson, Murray Singer, & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 148–181). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ferreira, Fernanda, & Henderson, John M. (1993). Reading processes during syntactic analysis and reanalysis. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 247–275. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 119–147). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates] Cited by2
    • Henderson, John M., & Ferreira, Fernanda. (1993). Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 201–221. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 73–93). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Spivey-Knowlton, Michael J., Trueswell, John C., & Tanenhaus, Michael K. (1995). Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: Discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. In John M. Henderson, Murray Singer, & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 148–181). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ferreira, Fernanda, Henderson, John. M., & Singer, Murray. (1995). Reading and language processing: Similarities and differences. In John M. Henderson, Murray Singer, & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 338–341). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ferreiro, E. (1978). What is written in a written sentence? A developmental answer. Journal of Education, 160(4), 25–39. Cited by6
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, & Sparks, Erin. (2015). Children's spelling development: Theories and evidence. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 311–325). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Ferreiro, Emilia. (1983). The development of literacy: A complex psychological problem. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 277–290). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Frith, Uta. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). Hove; Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Kurvers, Jeanne, Van Hout, Roeland, & Vallen, Ton. (2009). Print awareness of adult illiterates: A comparison with young pre-readers and low-educated adult readers. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 863–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9129-7
    • Levy-Schoen, Ariane, & O'Regan, Kevin. (1979). The control of eye movements in reading (tutorial paper). In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Smith, Frank. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [1978, second edition; 1982, third edition; 1988, fourth edition; 1994, fifth edition; 2004, sixth edition, Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
  • Ferreiro, Emilia. (1983). The development of literacy: A complex psychological problem. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 277–290). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers. Cited by2
    • Kurvers, Jeanne, Van Hout, Roeland, & Vallen, Ton. (2009). Print awareness of adult illiterates: A comparison with young pre-readers and low-educated adult readers. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 863–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9129-7
    • Stavans, Anat. (2015). Monolingual and multilingual discrimination of written sequences' readability. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.898574
  • Ferreiro, Emilia. (1985). Literacy development: A psychogenetic perspective. In David R. Olson, Nancy Torrance, & Angela Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 217–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by7
    • Kurvers, Jeanne, Van Hout, Roeland, & Vallen, Ton. (2009). Print awareness of adult illiterates: A comparison with young pre-readers and low-educated adult readers. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 863–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9129-7
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678466
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Raible, Wolfgang. (1994). Orality and literacy. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 1–17). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Smith, Frank. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [1978, second edition; 1982, third edition; 1988, fourth edition; 1994, fifth edition; 2004, sixth edition, Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Tolchinsky, Liliana. (2009). The configuration of literacy as a domain of knowledge. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 468–486). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ferreiro, E. (1986). The interplay between information and assimilation in beginning literacy. In W. H. Teale & E. Sulzby (Eds.), Emergent literacy: Writing and reading (pp. 15–49). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Cited by6
    • Foulin, Jean Noel. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Tolchinsky, Liliana. (2009). The configuration of literacy as a domain of knowledge. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 468–486). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Vernon, Sofía A., Calderón, Gabriela, & Castro, Luis. (2004). The relationship between phonological awareness and writing in Spanish-speaking kindergartners [Special issue: Process and acquisition of written language, edited by Robert Schreuder & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(1), 101–118.
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ferreiro, E. (1990). Literacy development: Psychogenesis. In Y. M. Goodman (Ed.), How children construct literacy: Piagetian perspectives (pp. 12–25). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Cited by6
    • Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, & Corrêa, Marcela Fulanete. (2010). The role of letter name knowledge in early spelling development: Evidence from Brazilian Portuguese. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 31–42). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_3
    • Kenner, Charmian. (2000). Symbols make text: A social semiotic analysis of writing in a multilingual nursery. Written Language & Literacy, 3(2), 235–266.
    • Lee, Lian-Ju. (2012). Understanding and facilitating literacy development amoung young Chinese-speaking children. In Ken Goodman, Shaomei Wang, Mieko Shimizu Iventosch, & Yetta Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 193–210). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Pollo, Tatiana Cury, Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2008). Three perspectives on spelling development. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 175–189). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Stavans, Anat. (2015). Monolingual and multilingual discrimination of written sequences' readability. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.898574
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ferreiro, Emilia. (1997). The word out of (conceptual) context. In Clotilde Pontecorvo (Ed.), Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6) (pp. 47–59). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. Cited by2
    • Bassetti, Benedetta. (2005). Effects of writing systems on second language awareness: Word awareness in English learners of Chinese as a foreign language. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 335–356). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597954‑015
    • Kurvers, Jeanne, Van Hout, Roeland, & Vallen, Ton. (2009). Print awareness of adult illiterates: A comparison with young pre-readers and low-educated adult readers. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 863–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9129-7
  • Ferreiro, Emilia, & Teberosky, Ana.(1979). Los sistemas de escritura en el desarrollo del niño. México: Siglo XXI. [1982, Literacy before schooling. Exeter, NH: Heinemann; 1985, La costruzione della lingua scritta nel bambino. Firenze: Giunti Editore] Cited by12
    • Dávalos, Amira, & Alvarado, Mónica. (2010). Elementary school children's decisions about paragraph organization [Special issue: Developmental aspects of written language, edited by Sofía A. Vernon & Mónica Alvarado]. Written Language & Literacy, 13(2), 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.2.04dav
    • Ferreiro, Emilia. (1983). The development of literacy: A complex psychological problem. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 277–290). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Homer, Bruce D., & Olson, David R. (1999). Literacy and children's conception of words. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.07hom
    • Lyons, Martyn, & Marquilhas, Rita (Eds.). (2017). Approaches to the history of written culture: A world inscribed (New Directions in Book History). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54136-5
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2009c). Why literacy matters, then and now. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 385–403). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Pellicer, Alejandra 2004). The orthographic contrast between two languages: Mayan and Spanish [Special issue: Process and acquisition of written language, edited by Robert Schreuder & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(1), 35–48.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde, & Rossi, Franca. (2015). What have we learned about the transition phases to the syllabic and alphabetic systems? In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 176–191). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    • Ramachandra, Vijayachandra, & Karanth, Prathibha. (2007). The role of literacy in the conceptualization of words: Data from Kannada-speaking children and non-literate adults. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9000-7
    • Rico, Christophe. (2015). Les étapes du développement de l'écriture chez l'enfant et l'histoire de l'alphabet. In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 192–219). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    • Stavans, Anat. (2015). Monolingual and multilingual discrimination of written sequences' readability. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.898574
  • Ferreiro, Emilia, & Teberosky, Ana. (1982). Literacy before schooling. Exeter, NH: Heinemann. [1979, Los sistemas de escritura en el desarrollo del niño. México: Siglo XXI; 1985, La costruzione della lingua scritta nel bambino. Firenze: Giunti Editore] Cited by55
    • Alcock, Katie, & Ngorosho, Damaris. (2007). Learning to spell and learning phonology: The spelling of consonant clusters in Kiswahili. Reading and Writing, 20(7), 643–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9043-9
    • Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [2007, Second edition]
    • Both-de Vries, Anna C., & Bus, Adriana G. (2010b). The proper name as starting point for basic reading skills. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9158-2
    • Both-de Vries, Anna C., & Bus, Adriana G. (2010a). It's all in the name. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 3–15). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_1
    • Correa, Jane, & Dockrell, Julie E. (2007). Unconventional word segmentation in Brazilian children's early text production. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 815–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9049-3
    • Crystal, David. (2015). Making a point: The pernickety story of English punctuation. London: Profile Books.
    • De Manrique, Ana María Borzone, & Signorini, Angela. (1998). Emergent writing forms in Spanish. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(6), 499–517.
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, & Sparks, Erin. (2015). Children's spelling development: Theories and evidence. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 311–325). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Defior, Sylvia, & Serrano, Francisca. (2005). The initial development of spelling in Spanish: From global to analytical. Reading and Writing, 18(1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5893-1
    • Dehn, Mechthild, & Sjölin, Amelie. (1996). Frühes Lesen und Schreiben [Early reading and writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1141–1153). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Foulin, Jean Noel. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2
    • Frost, Jørgen. (2001a). Phonemic awareness, spontaneous writing, and reading and spelling development from a preventive perspective. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 487–513.
    • Günther, Klaus-B. (1996). Die Schrift als kompensatorisches Mittel zum Verbalspracherwerb [Written language as a means of learning spoken language]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1205–1216). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Hertz-Lazarowitz, Rachel. (2004). Storybook writing in first grade. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(3), 267–299.
    • Homer, Bruce D. (2009). Literacy and metalinguistic development. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 487–500). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Homer, Bruce D., & Olson, David R. (1999). Literacy and children's conception of words. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.07hom
    • Hung, Yueh-Nu. (2012a). How a morphosyllabic writing system works in Chinese. In Ken Goodman, Shaomei Wang, Mieko Shimizu Iventosch, & Yetta Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 16–31). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Jaffré, Jean-Pierre, & Fayol, Michel. (2006). Orthography and literacy in French. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 81–103). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Kenner, Charmian. (2000). Symbols make text: A social semiotic analysis of writing in a multilingual nursery. Written Language & Literacy, 3(2), 235–266.
    • Korat, Ofra, Klein, Pnina, & Segal-Drori, Ora. (2007). Maternal mediation in book reading, home literacy environment, and children's emergent literacy: A comparison between two social groups. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 361–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9034-x
    • Kurvers, Jeanne, Van Hout, Roeland, & Vallen, Ton. (2009). Print awareness of adult illiterates: A comparison with young pre-readers and low-educated adult readers. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 863–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9129-7
    • Lee, Lian-Ju. (2012). Understanding and facilitating literacy development amoung young Chinese-speaking children. In Ken Goodman, Shaomei Wang, Mieko Shimizu Iventosch, & Yetta Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 193–210). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Leikin, Mark, Schwartz, Mila, & Share, David L. (2010). General and specific benefits of bi-literate bilingualism: A Russian–Hebrew study of beginning literacy [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9210-x
    • Nunes, Terezinha. (2016). Teaching literacy to English children: Policy and practice. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 205–221). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2009a). A theory of reading/writing: From literacy to literature. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp005
    • Olson, David R. (2009c). Why literacy matters, then and now. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 385–403). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678466
    • Pollo, Tatiana Cury, Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2008). Three perspectives on spelling development. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 175–189). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Puranik, Cynthia S., & Lonigan, Christopher J. (2011). From scribbles to scrabble: Preschool children's developing knowledge of written language. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9220-8
    • Ramachandra, Vijayachandra, & Karanth, Prathibha. (2007). The role of literacy in the conceptualization of words: Data from Kannada-speaking children and non-literate adults. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9000-7
    • Rector, Monica. (1994). A note on teaching writing to Rio slum children. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 59–65). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Robins, Sarah, & Treiman, Rebecca. (2010). Learning about writing begins informally. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 17–29). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_2
    • Roy-Charland, Annie, Saint-Aubin, Jean, & Evans, Mary Ann. (2007). Eye movements in shared book reading with children from kindergarten to Grade 4. Reading and Writing, 20(9), 909–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9059-9
    • Sandbank, Ana. (2016). Writing as a domain of knowledge for both children and researchers. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 109–124). Cham: Springer.
    • Scheerer-Neumann, Gerheid. (1996a). Der Erwerb der basalen Lese- und Schreibfertigkeiten [The acquisition of basic reading and writing skills]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1153–1169). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Scheerer-Neumann, Gerheid. (1996b). Störungen des Erwerbs der Schriftlichkeit bei alphabetischen Schriftsystemen [Disorders in written language acquisition]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1329–1351). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Schiff, Rachel, & Korat, Ofra. (2006). Sociocultural factors in children's written narrative production. Written Language & Literacy, 9(2), 213–246.
    • Segal-Drori, Ora, Korat, Ofra, Shamir, Adina, & Klein, Pnina S. (2010). Reading electronic and printed books with and without adult instruction: Effects on emergent reading. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 913–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9182-x
    • Sénéchal, Monique, Ouellette, Gene, Pagan, Stephanie, & Lever, Rosemary. (2012). The role of invented spelling on learning to read in low-phoneme awareness kindergartners: A randomized-control-trial study. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9310-2
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Share, David L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(752). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
    • Share, David, & Levin, Iris. (1999). Learning to read and write in Hebrew. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 89–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Smith, Frank. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [1978, second edition; 1982, third edition; 1988, fourth edition; 1994, fifth edition; 2004, sixth edition, Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stavans, Anat. (2015). Monolingual and multilingual discrimination of written sequences' readability. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.898574
    • Teberosky, Ana, Sepúlveda, Angélica, & Costa e Sousa, Otília. (2020). Orality, reading and writing in early literacy. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 85–105). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_6
    • Treiman, Rebecca. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2013a). Learning to use an alphabetic writing system [Special issue: Learning to read and write: Connections between written and spoken language]. Language Learning and Development, 9(4), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2013.812016
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, Mulqueeny, Kevin, & Kessler, Brett. (2015). Young children's knowledge about the spatial layout of writing. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.924386
    • Treiman, Rebecca, Rosales, Nicole, & Kessler, Brett. (2016). Characteristics of print in books for preschool children. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1074058
    • Vernon, Sofía A. (2016). Syllabic processes in the initial stages of writing development. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 93–108). Cham: Springer.
    • Vernon, Sofía A., Calderón, Gabriela, & Castro, Luis. (2004). The relationship between phonological awareness and writing in Spanish-speaking kindergartners [Special issue: Process and acquisition of written language, edited by Robert Schreuder & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(1), 101–118.
  • Ferreiro, Emilia, & Teberosky, Ana. (1985). La costruzione della lingua scritta nel bambino. Firenze: Giunti Editore. [1979, Los sistemas de escritura en el desarrollo del niño. México: Siglo XXI; 1982, Literacy before schooling. Exeter, NH: Heinemann] Cited by3
    • Cossu, Giuseppe. (1999a). The acquisition of Italian orthography. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 10–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde, & Rossi, Franca. (2015). What have we learned about the transition phases to the syllabic and alphabetic systems? In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 176–191). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Fesel, Sabine S., Segers, Eliane, de Leeuw, Linda, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2016). Strategy training and mind-mapping facilitates children's hypertext comprehension. Written Language & Literacy, 19(2), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.2.01fes
  • Feustel, T. C., Shriffrin, R. M., & Salasoo, A. (1983). Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition priming effect in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 309–346. Cited by5
    • Feldman, Laurie B. (1992). Morphological relationships revealed through the repetition priming task. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 239–254). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Feldman, Laurie B., & Andjelković, Darinka. (1992). Morphological analysis in word recognition. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Phonology, orthography, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 343–360). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Forster, Kenneth. (1992). Memory-addressing mechanisms and lexical access. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 413–434). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Grainger, Jonathan. (1992). Orthographic neighborhoods and visual word recognition. In Ram Frost and Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 131–146). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Weekes, Brendan, Chen, May Jane, & Yu, Bo-lin. (1997). Repetition priming effects of Chinese characters and pseudocharacters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 171–186). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  • Février, James-Germain. (1948). Histoire de l'écriture. Paris: Payot. [1959, Second edition] Cited by15
    • Basso, Keith H., & Anderson, Ned. (1977). A Western Apache writing system: The symbols of Silas John. In Joshua A. Fishman, (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 77–104). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1992b). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 83–110). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2001). Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 43–80). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. [2017, Second edition, (pp. 75–94)]
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2006). On beyond alphabets [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.03dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (1997). Rongorongo: The Easter Island script: History, traditions, texts (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 14). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2012). The shape of script: How and why writing systems change (School for Advanced Research Advanced Seminar Series). Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
    • Jensen, Hans. (1935). Die Schrift in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Glückstadt; Hamburg: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften VEB. [1958, Second edition; 1968, Third edition; 1969, Sign, symbol and script: An account of man's efforts to write (Translated by George Unwin). London: George Allen & Unwin; New York: Putman's]
    • Sirat, Colette. (1994). Handwriting and the writing hand. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 375–460). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Février, James-Germain. (1959). Histoire de l'écriture (Second edition). Paris: Payot. [1948, First edition] Cited by20
    • Bhatt, Prath M. (1988). Graphic systems, phonic systems, and linguistic representations. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 106–120). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Bright, William. (1999). A matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.03bri
    • Bright, William. (2000). A matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 63–71.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2001). Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 43–80). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. [2017, Second edition, (pp. 75–94)]
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2006). On beyond alphabets [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.03dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2017a). The writing systems of Indo-European. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph, & Matthias Fritz (Eds.) in cooperation with Mark Wenthe, Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 41.1) (pp. 26–61). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261288-00
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • de Kerckhove, Derrick. (1988a). Logical principles underlying the layout of Greek orthography. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 153–172). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Dichy, Joseph. (2017). The analytics of writing, exemplified by Arabic, the youngest of the Semitic scripts. In Manuel Sartori, Manuela E. B. Giolfo, & Philippe Cassuto (Eds), Approaches to the history and dialectology of Arabic in honor of Pierre Larcher (Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics 88) (pp. 29–56). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1984). A history of writing. London: British Library. [1987, Second edition; 1992, Third revised edition, London: British Library; New York: Abbeville Press]
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Glück, Helmut. (1994). Schriften im Kontakt [Writing systems in contact]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 745–766). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Hagège, Claude. (1988). Writing: The invention and the dream. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 72–83). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Haralambous, Yannis. (2007). Fonts & encodings: From Unicode to advanced typography and everything in between (translated by P. Scott Horne). Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
    • Harris, Roy. (2000). Rethinking writing. London; New York: Continuum.
    • LaFont, Robert. (1988). Relationships between speech and writing systems in ancient alphabets and syllabaries. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 92–105). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Puech, Emile. (2015). Aux sources de l'alphabet: De quelques anciens témoignages en écriture alphabétique. In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 73–123). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    • Sirat, Colette. (1994). Handwriting and the writing hand. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 375–460). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Fichtner, Bernd. (1986). Wie lernen Kinder lesen und schreiben? - Aspekte einer pädagogischen Fragestellung [How do children learn to read and to write? - Aspects of a pedagogical problem]. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 444–462). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Fidlerová, Alena A. (2020). Orthography and group identity: A comparative approach to studying orthographic systems in Early Modern Czech printed and handwritten texts (c. 1560‒1710). In Marco Condorelli (Ed.), Advances in historical orthography, c. 1500–1800 (pp. 154–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674171.008
  • Fiebach, C. J., Friederici, A. D., Muller, K., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). fMRI evidence for dual routes to the mental lexicon in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317205285 Cited by8
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Frost, Stephen J., Sandak, Rebecca, Mencl, W. Einar, Landi, Nicole, Moore, Dina, Della Porta, Gina, Rueckl, Jay G., Katz, Leonard, & Pugh, Kenneth R. (2008). Neurobiological and behavioral studies of skilled and impaired word reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 355–376). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Jasińska, Kaja K., Frost, Stephen, Molfese, Peter, Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, Rueckl, Jay, & Pugh, Ken. (2016). Neuroimaging perspectives on skilled and impaired reading and the bilingual experience. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_3
    • Simos, Panagiotis G., Billingsley-Marshall, Rebecca, Sarkari, Shirin, & Papanicolaou, Andrew C. (2008). Single-word reading: Perspectives from magnetic source imaging. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 211–232). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Weekes, Brendan S. (2010). Lexical retrieval in alphabetic and non-alphabetic scripts: Evidence from brain imaging. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 273–289). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
  • Fielding-Barnsley, Ruth. (1997). Explicit instruction in decoding benefits children high in phonemic awareness and alphabet knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0101_5
  • Fiez, J. A., Balota, D. A., Raichle, M. E., & Petersen, S. E. (1999). Effects of lexicality, frequency, and spelling-to-sound consistency on the functional anatomy of reading. Neuron, 24(1), 205–218. Cited by11
    • Andrews, Sally. (2006a). Preface. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. xix–xxix). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Balota, David A., & Yap, Melvin J. (2006). Attentional control and the flexible lexical processor: Explorations of the magic moment of word recognition. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 229–258). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Frost, Stephen J., Sandak, Rebecca, Mencl, W. Einar, Landi, Nicole, Moore, Dina, Della Porta, Gina, Rueckl, Jay G., Katz, Leonard, & Pugh, Kenneth R. (2008). Neurobiological and behavioral studies of skilled and impaired word reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 355–376). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Jasińska, Kaja K., Frost, Stephen, Molfese, Peter, Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, Rueckl, Jay, & Pugh, Ken. (2016). Neuroimaging perspectives on skilled and impaired reading and the bilingual experience. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_3
    • Kumar, Uttam, Das, Tanusree, Bapi, Raju S., Padakannaya, Prakash, Joshi, R. Malatesha, & Singh, Nandini C. (2010). Reading different orthographies: An fMRI study of phrase reading in Hindi–English bilinguals. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9176-8
    • Perfetti, Charles A., & Liu, Ying. (2005). Orthography to phonology and meaning: Comparisons across and within writing systems [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2344-y
    • Simos, Panagiotis G., Billingsley-Marshall, Rebecca, Sarkari, Shirin, & Papanicolaou, Andrew C. (2008). Single-word reading: Perspectives from magnetic source imaging. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 211–232). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Weekes, Brendan S. (2010). Lexical retrieval in alphabetic and non-alphabetic scripts: Evidence from brain imaging. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 273–289). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
  • Fiez, J. A., & Petersen, S. E. (1998). Neuroimaging studies of word reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 95(3), 914–921. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.3.914 Cited by11
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Cao, Fan. (2018). Brain mechanisms of Chinese word reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 137–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Frost, Stephen J., Sandak, Rebecca, Mencl, W. Einar, Landi, Nicole, Moore, Dina, Della Porta, Gina, Rueckl, Jay G., Katz, Leonard, & Pugh, Kenneth R. (2008). Neurobiological and behavioral studies of skilled and impaired word reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 355–376). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Grigorenko, Elena L. (2008). Four “nons” of the brain–genes connection. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 283–308). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Jasińska, Kaja K., Frost, Stephen, Molfese, Peter, Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, Rueckl, Jay, & Pugh, Ken. (2016). Neuroimaging perspectives on skilled and impaired reading and the bilingual experience. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_3
    • Matthews, Paul M., Fu, Shimin, Chen, Yi-Ping, & Iversen, Susan. (2002). Functional magnetic resonance imaging: A promising tool for defining the organization of Chinese language in the brain. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 61–77). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Perfetti, Charles A., & Liu, Ying. (2005). Orthography to phonology and meaning: Comparisons across and within writing systems [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2344-y
    • Perfetti, Charles A., Liu, Ying, & Tan, Li-Tan. (2002). How the mind can meet the brain in reading: A comparative writing systems approach. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 35–60). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Simos, Panagiotis G., Billingsley-Marshall, Rebecca, Sarkari, Shirin, & Papanicolaou, Andrew C. (2008). Single-word reading: Perspectives from magnetic source imaging. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 211–232). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Figueredo, L. (2006). Using the known to chart the unknown: A review of first-language influence on the development of English-as-a-second-language spelling skill. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 873–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9014-1 Cited by5
    • Allaith, Zainab A., & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2011). Spelling performance of English consonants among students whose first language is Arabic [Special issue: Literacy acquisition in Arabic, edited by Abdessatar Mahfoudhi, John Everatt & Gad Elbeheri]. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 1089–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9294-3
    • Dich, Nadya. (2010). Development of sensitivity to phonological context in learning to spell in English: Evidence from Russian ESL speakers. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.04dic
    • Leikin, Mark, Schwartz, Mila, & Share, David L. (2010). General and specific benefits of bi-literate bilingualism: A Russian–Hebrew study of beginning literacy [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9210-x
    • Nakamura, Pooja, Joshi, R. Malatesha, & Ji, Xuejun Ryan. (2019). Biliteracy spelling acquisition in akshara and English. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 103–117). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_6
    • Varnhagen, Connie K., McFall, G. Peggy, Pugh, Nicole, Routledge, Lisa, Sumida-MacDonald, Heather, & Kwong, Trudy E. (2010). lol: New language and spelling in instant messaging. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9181-y
  • Finkel, Irving. (2010). Strange byways in cuneiform writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 9–25). Leiden; Boston: Brill. Cited by1
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
  • Finkel, Leif H. (1988). A basis for categorization by the nervous system. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 51–69). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Finkelstein, I., & Sass, B. (2013). The West Semitic alphabetic inscriptions, Late Bronze II to Iron IIA: Archeological context, distribution and chronology. Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel, 2(2), 149–220. https://doi.org/10.1628/219222713X13757034787838 Cited by11
    • Boyes, Philip J. (2021). Script and society: The social context of writing practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 3). Oxbow; Philadephia: Oxbow Books.
    • Boyes, Philip J., & Steele, Philippa M. (Eds). (2020). Understanding relations between scripts II: Early alphabets. (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS) 1). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Goldwasser, Orly. (2015). The invention of the alphabet: On “lost papyri” and the Egyptian “alphabet”. In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 124–141). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    • Hamilton, Gordon J. (2014). Reconceptualizing the periods of early alphabetic scripts. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (Eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross (pp. 30–55). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    • Koller, Aaron. (2018). The diffusion of the alphabet in the second millennium BCE: On the movements of scribal ideas from Egypt to the Levant, Mesopotamia, and Yemen. Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections, 20, 1–14.
    • Lemarie, André. (2015). Levantine literacy ca. 1000–750 BCE. In Brian B. Schmidt (Ed.), Contextualizing Israel's sacred writing: Ancient literacy, orality, and literary production (Ancient Israel and Its Literature 22) (pp. 11–45). Atlanta, GA: SBL Press.
    • Sass, Benjamin. (2016). Aram and Israel during the 10th–9th centuries BCE, or Iron IIA. The Alphabet. In Omer Sergi, Manfred Oeming & Izaak J. de Hulster (Eds.), In search of Aram and Israel. Politics, culture and identity (Oriental Religions in Antiquity: Egypt, Israel, Ancient Near East 20) (pp. 199–227). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
    • Schmidt, Brian B. (2015b). Memorializing conflict: Toward an Iron Age “shadow” history of Israel's earliest literature. In Brian B. Schmidt (Ed.), Contextualizing Israel's sacred writing: Ancient literacy, orality, and literary production (Ancient Israel and Its Literature 22) (pp. 103–132). Atlanta, GA: SBL Press.
    • Schniedewind, William M. (2019). The finger of the scribe: How scribes learned to write the Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding relations between scripts: The Aegean writing systems. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Yasur-Landau, Assaf. (2017). Non-scribal communication in the Southern Levant during the Middle and Late Bronze Ages. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 207–219). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  • Finlayson, Sarah. (2013). Form follows function: Writing and its supports in the Aegean Bronze Age. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 123–142). London: Ubiquity Press. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.g Cited by1
    • Ferrara, Silvia, & Jasink, Anna Margherita. (2017). To have and to hold: Hieroglyphic seals as personal markers and objects of display. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 41–53). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  • Finlayson, Sarah. (2021). Writing and elite status in the Bronze Age Aegean. In Philip J. Boyes, Philippa M. Steele, & Natalia Elvira Astoreca (Eds.), The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices (pp. 249–267). Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
  • Finnegan, R. (1970). Oral literature in Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Cited by3
    • Goody, Jack. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind (Themes in the Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goody, Jack. (1987). The interface between the written and oral (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
  • Finnegan, R. (1977). Oral poetry: Its nature significance, and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by11
    • Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [2007, Second edition]
    • Bolter, Jay David. (1991). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [2001, Second edition]
    • Goody, Jack. (1987). The interface between the written and oral (Studies in Literacy, Family, Culture and the State). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Homer, Bruce D., & Olson, David R. (1999). Literacy and children's conception of words. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.07hom
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2009b). Literacy, literacy policy, and the school. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 566–576). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word (New Accents). London; New York: Methuen. [1986, Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1987, Oralität und Literalität. Die Technologisierung des Wortes. Opladen; 2002, Second edition, London; New York: Routledge; 2012, 30th anniversary edition (with additional chapters by John Hartley), London; New York: Routledge]
    • Parker, Holt N. (2009). Books and reading Latin poetry. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 186–229). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Polak, Frank H. (2015). Oral substratum, language usage, and thematic flow in the Abraham-Jacob narrative. In Brian B. Schmidt (Ed.), Contextualizing Israel's sacred writing: Ancient literacy, orality, and literary production (Ancient Israel and Its Literature 22) (pp. 217–238). Atlanta, GA: SBL Press.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Waal, Willemijn. (2018). On the “Phoenician letters”: The case for an early transmission of the Greek alphabet from an archaeological, epigraphic and linguistic perspective. Aegean Studies, 1, 83–125.
  • Finnegan, R. (1988). Literacy and orality: Studies in the technology of communication. Oxford: Blackwell. Cited by15
    • Baron, Naomi S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Elinson, Alexander. (2017). Writing oral and literary culture: The case of the contemporary Moroccan zajal. In Jacob Høigilt & Gunvor Mejdell (Eds.), The politics of written language in the Arab world: Writing change (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 90) (pp. 190–211). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Graff, Harvey J. (1987a). The labyrinths of literacy: Reflections on literacy past and present. London: The Falmer Press. [1995, Revised and expanded edition, (Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture), Pittsburgh, PA; London: University of Pittsburgh Press]
    • Houston, Stephen. (1994). Literacy among the Pre-Columbian Maya: A comparative perspective. In Elizabeth H. Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 27–49). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2012). The shape of script: How and why writing systems change (School for Advanced Research Advanced Seminar Series). Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Miller, Robert D., II. (2015). The performance of oral tradition in Ancient Israel. In Brian B. Schmidt (Ed.), Contextualizing Israel's sacred writing: Ancient literacy, orality, and literary production (Ancient Israel and Its Literature 22) (pp. 175–196). Atlanta, GA: SBL Press.
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (2009a). A theory of reading/writing: From literacy to literature. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp005
    • Olson, David R., & Oatley, Keith. (2014). The quotation theory of writing. Written Communication, 31(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515164
    • Olson, David R., & Torrance, Nancy. (2009). Preface. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. xiii-xxi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Street, Brian V., & Lefstein, Adam. (2007). Literacy: An advanced resource book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Werner, Shirley. (2009). Literacy studies in classics: The last twenty years. In William A. Johnson & Holt N. Parker (Eds.), Ancient literacies: The culture of reading in Greece and Rome (pp. 333–382). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Finnegan, Ruth. (2001). [Book review: Khosrow Jahandarie, (1999), Spoken and written discourse: A multi-disciplinary perspective]. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 101–105.
  • Firmage, R. A. (1993). The alphabet abecedarium: Some notes on letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine. [2000, Reprinted, London: Bloomsbury] Cited by1
    • Boeckeler, Erika Mary. (2017). Playful letters: A study in early modern alphabetics. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
  • Firth, I. (1972). Components of reading disability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New South Wales, Australia. Cited by7
    • Barron, Roderick W. (1981). Reading skill and reading strategies. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 299–327). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Castles, Anne, & Nation, Kate. (2006). How does orthographic learning happen? In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From ink marks to ideas: Challenges and controversies about word recognition and reading (pp. 151–179). Hove; New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203841211
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Wright, Patricia. (1980). Textual literacy: An outline sketch of psychological research on reading and writing. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 517–535). New York; London: Plenum Press.
  • Fischer, F. W., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, I. Y. (1985). Spelling proficiency and sensitivity to word structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 423–441. Cited by17
    • Allyn, Frances A., & Burt, Jennifer S. (1998). Pinch my wig or winch my pig: Spelling, spoonerisms and other language skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 51–74.
    • Burt, Jennifer S., & Fury, Mary B. (2000). Spelling in adults: The role of reading skills and experience. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 1–30.
    • Egan, Joanne, & Pring, Linda. (2004). The processing of inflectional morphology: A comparison of children with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 567–591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044433.30864.23
    • Holmes, Virginia M., & Malone, N. (2004). Adult spelling strategies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 537–566.
    • Juul, Holger, & Elbro, Carsten. (2004). The links between grammar and spelling: A cognitive hurdle in deep orthographies? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 915–942.
    • Katz, Leonard, & Feldman, Laurie B. (1996). The influence of an alphabetic writing system on the reading process. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1094–1101). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Kroese, Judith M., Hynd, George W., Knight, Deborah F., Hiemenz, Jennifer R., & Hall, Josh. (2000). Clinical appraisal of spelling ability and its relationship to phonemic awareness (blending, segmenting, elision, and reversal), phonological memory, and reading in reading disabled, ADHD, and normal children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 105–131.
    • Mann, Virginia A., & Balise, Raymond R. (1994). Predicting reading ability from the “invented” spellings of kindergarten children. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 37–57). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • McGuinness, Diane. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Perfetti, Charles, & Harris, Lindsay. (2017). Learning to read English. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 347–370). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Lundquis, Eric. (1992). On the relations between learning to spell and learning to read. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 179–192). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Singson, Maria, Mahony, Diana, & Mann, Virginia. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 219–252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008196330239
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Treiman, Rebecca. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Tsesmeli, Styliani N., & Seymour, Philip H. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 587–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9011-4
    • Walker, Joanne, & Hauerwas, Laura Boynton. (2006). Development of phonological, morphological, and orthographic knowledge in young spellers: The case of inflected verbs. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 819–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9006-1
  • Fischer, Henry G. (1977). Hieroglyphen. In Wolfgang Helck & Wolfhart Westendorf (Eds.), Lexikon der Ägyptologie: Volume 2 (pp. 1189–1199). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. Cited by6
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996c). The first civilization. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 21–32). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Davies, W. V. (1987). Egyptian hieroglyphs (Reading the past). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press. [1990, In J. T. Hooker (Ed.), Reading the past: Ancient writing from cuneiform to the alphabet (pp. 75–135). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press]
    • Meltzer, Edmund S. (1980). Remarks on ancient Egyptian writing with emphasis on its mnemonic aspects. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma, (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 43–66). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Ray, John D. (1986). The emergence of writing in Egypt. World Archaeology, 17(3), 307–316.
    • Ritner, Robert K. (1996a). Egyptian writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 73–84). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Schenkel, Wolfgang. (1994). Die ägyptische Hieroglyphenschrift und ihre Weiterentwicklungen [Egyptian hieroglyphs and their development]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 289–297). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Fischer, Henry George. (1977). The orientation of hieroglyphs: Part 1 Reversals. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. Cited by6
    • Gaur, Albertine. (2000). Literacy and the politics of writing. Bristol; Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2012). The shape of script: How and why writing systems change (School for Advanced Research Advanced Seminar Series). Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
    • Piquette, Kathryn E. (2018a). An archaeology of art and writing: Early Egyptian labels in context. Cologne: Modern Academic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.16994/bak
    • Schenkel, Wolfgang. (1994). Die ägyptische Hieroglyphenschrift und ihre Weiterentwicklungen [Egyptian hieroglyphs and their development]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 289–297). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Sirat, Colette. (1988). The material conditions of the lateralization of the ductus. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 173–201). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Sirat, Colette. (1994). Handwriting and the writing hand. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 375–460). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Fischer, Henry G. (1986). L'écriture et l'art de l'Egypte ancienne: Quatre leçons sur la paléographie et l'épigraphie pharaoniques. Collège de France, Essais et Conférences. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Cited by8
    • Assmann, Jan. (1994). Die ägyptische Schriftkultur [The literate culture of ancient Egypt]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 472–491). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Davies, W. V. (1987). Egyptian hieroglyphs (Reading the past). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press. [1990, In J. T. Hooker (Ed.), Reading the past: Ancient writing from cuneiform to the alphabet (pp. 75–135). London: The British Museum Press: Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press]
    • Fischer, Henry George. (1989). The origin of Egyptian hieroglyphs. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 59–76). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2012). The shape of script: How and why writing systems change (School for Advanced Research Advanced Seminar Series). Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
    • Meltzer, Edmund S. (1994). Hieratic is beautiful: Ancient Egyptian calligraphy revisited. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 293–301). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Mignolo, Walter D. (1994a). Signs and their transmission: The question of the book in the New World. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 220–270). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Schenkel, Wolfgang. (1994). Die ägyptische Hieroglyphenschrift und ihre Weiterentwicklungen [Egyptian hieroglyphs and their development]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 289–297). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Fischer, Henry George. (1989). The origin of Egyptian hieroglyphs. In Wayne M. Senner (Ed.), The origins of writing (pp. 59–76). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. Cited by5
    • Boltz, William G. (1994). The origin and early development of the Chinese writing system (American Oriental Series 78). New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society. [2003, reprinted with corrections]
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Piquette, Kathryn E. (2018a). An archaeology of art and writing: Early Egyptian labels in context. Cologne: Modern Academic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.16994/bak
    • Piquette, Kathryn E. (2018b). Signs and symbols. In Andrew Gardner, Mark Lake, & Ulrike Sommer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of archaeological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199567942.013.020
  • Fischer, Steven Roger. (1997). Rongorongo: The Easter Island script: History, traditions, texts (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 14). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Cited by9
    • Baines, John. (2008). Writing and its multiple disappearances. In John Baines, John Bennet, & Stephen Houston (Eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication (pp. 347–362). London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Houston, Stephen, Baines, John, & Cooper, Jerrold. (2003). Last writing: Script obsolescence in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Mesoamerica. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45(3), 430–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417503000227
    • Macri, Martha J. (1999). [Book review: Steven Roger Fischer, (1997), Rongorongo: The Easter Island script: History, traditions, text]. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 152–156.
    • Melka, Tomi S. (2013). On a “kinetic”-like sequence in rongorongo tablet “Mamari”. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.742005
    • Melka, Tomi S., & Schoch, Robert M. (2021). A case in point: Communication with unknown intelligence/s. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 513–559). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-melk
    • Schoch, Robert M., & Melka, Tomi S. (2021). A “Sacred Amulet from Easter Island—1885/6—”: Analyzing enigmatic glyphic characters in the context of the rongorongo script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 847–903). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-scho
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2010). Language, technology, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books. Cited by14
    • Clayton, Ewan. (2013). The golden thread: The story of writing. London: Atlantic Books; Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint.
    • Dichy, Joseph. (2017). The analytics of writing, exemplified by Arabic, the youngest of the Semitic scripts. In Manuel Sartori, Manuela E. B. Giolfo, & Philippe Cassuto (Eds), Approaches to the history and dialectology of Arabic in honor of Pierre Larcher (Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics 88) (pp. 29–56). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Iwaniszewski, Stanisław. (2019). Geometric motifs in rock art as a system of visual communication. In Katarzyna Mikulska & Jerome A. Offner (Eds.), Indigenous graphic communication systems: A theoretical approach (pp. 257–273). Louisville, University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607329350.c009
    • Joyce, Terry. (2004). Modeling the Japanese mental lexicon: Morphological, orthographic and phonological considerations. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in Psychological Research: Volume 31 (pp. 27–61). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.04joy [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Joyce, Terry. (2016). Writing systems and scripts. In Andrea Rocci & Louis de Saussure (Eds.), Verbal communication (Handbooks of Communication Science 3) (pp. 287–308). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255478-016
    • Joyce, Terry, & Masuda, Hisashi. (2018). Introduction to the multi-script Japanese writing system and word processing. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 179–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Li, Yu. (2020). The Chinese writing system in Asia: An interdisciplinary perspective. London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345333
    • Lock, Charles. (2016). On roman letters and other stories: An essay in heterographics. Journal of World Literature, 1(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/ 10.1163/24056480-00102003
    • Lurie, David B. (2006). Language, writing, and disciplinarity in the critique of the “Ideographic Myth”: Some proleptical remarks. Language & Communication, 26, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.015
    • Militello, Pietro M. (2017). Management, power and non-literate communication in Prepalatial and Palatial Messara. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 55–72). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 18). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Fischler, I. (1977). Associative facilitation without expectancy in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 18–26. Cited by5
    • Allport, D. Alan. (1979). Word recognition in reading (tutorial paper). In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 227–257). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Levy, Betty Ann. (1981). Interactive processing during reading. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 1–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (1981a). Attentional and automatic context effects in reading. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 241–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Fischler, I., & Bloom, P. A. (1979). Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 1–20. Cited by9
    • Glushko, Robert J. (1981). Principles for pronouncing print: The psychology of phonography. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 61–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Levy, Betty Ann. (1981). Interactive processing during reading. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 1–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • McConkie, George W., & Zola, David. (1981). Language constraints and the functional stimulus in reading. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 155–175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Perfetti, Charles A., & Roth, Steven F. (1981). Some of the interactive processes in reading and their role in reading skill. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 269–297). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rayner, Keith, Schotter, Elizabeth R., Masson, Michael E. J., Potter, Mary C., & Treiman, Rebecca. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. doi10.1177/1529100615623267
    • Seidenberg, Mark S., & McClelland, James L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (1981a). Attentional and automatic context effects in reading. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 241–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Fischler, I., & Goodman, G. O. (1978). Latency of associative activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 455–470. Cited by7
    • de Groot, Annette M. B. (1992). Bilingual lexical representation: A closer look at conceptual representations. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 389–412). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Levy, Betty Ann. (1981). Interactive processing during reading. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 1–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (1981a). Attentional and automatic context effects in reading. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 241–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Balota, David A. (2015). Visual word recognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 26–43). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Fisher, D. F. (1975). Reading and visual search. Memory & Cognition, 3, 188–196. Cited by7
    • Akamatsu, Nobuhiko. (2005). Effects of second language reading proficiency and first language orthography on second language word recognition. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 238–259). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Carver, Ronald P. (1997). Reading for one second, one minute, or one year from the perspective of rauding theory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0101_2
    • Fisher, Dennis F. (1979). Understanding the reading process through the use of transformed typography: PSG, CSG and automaticity. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 77–89). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Reich, Shulamit S., & Cherry, Colin. (1979). A direct access from graphics to meaning: A study of the Stroop effect in sentences. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 371–377). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Treurniet, William C. (1980). Spacing of characters on a television display. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 365–374). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Vitrano-Wilson, Seth. (2016). Reading syllable-spaced versus word-spaced text in Hmong Daw: Breaking up isn't so hard to do. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1225562
  • Fisher, Dennis F. (1979). Understanding the reading process through the use of transformed typography: PSG, CSG and automaticity. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 77–89). New York; London: Plenum Press. Cited by2
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • McConkie, George W. (1979). On the role and control of eye movements in reading. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 37–48). New York; London: Plenum Press.
  • Fisher, D. F., & Lefton, L. A. (1976). Peripheral information extraction: A developmental examination of reading processes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 21, 77–93. Cited by4
    • Fisher, Dennis F. (1979). Understanding the reading process through the use of transformed typography: PSG, CSG and automaticity. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 77–89). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Lefton, Lester A. (1979). Reading and searching through geometrically transformed text. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 91–96). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Treurniet, William C. (1980). Spacing of characters on a television display. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 365–374). New York; London: Plenum Press.
  • Fisher, D. F., & Montanary, W. E. (1977). Spatial and contextual factors in beginning reading: Evidence for PSG-CSG complements to developing automaticity? Memory & Cognition, 5, 247–251. Cited by4
    • Fisher, Dennis F. (1979). Understanding the reading process through the use of transformed typography: PSG, CSG and automaticity. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 77–89). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Lefton, Lester A. (1979). Reading and searching through geometrically transformed text. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 91–96). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
  • Fisher, S. E., & DeFries, J. C. (2002). Developmental dyslexia: Genetic dissection of a complex cognitive trait. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 767–780. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn936 Cited by9
    • Barr, Cathy L., & Couto, Jillian M. (2008). Molecular genetics of reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 255–281). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Betjemann, Rebecca S., Willcutt, Erik G., Olson, Richard K., Keenan, Janice M., DeFries, John C., & Wadsworth, Sally J. (2008). Word reading and reading comprehension: stability, overlap and independence. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9076-8
    • Byrne, Brian, Samuelsson, Stefan, Wadsworth, Sally, Hulslander, Jacqueline, Corley, Robin, DeFries, John C., Quain, Peter, Willcutt, Erik G., & Olson, Richard K. (2007). Longitudinal twin study of early literacy development: Preschool through Grade 1 [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9019-9
    • Harlaar, Nicole, Dale, Philip S., & Plomin, Robert. (2005). Telephone testing and teacher assessment of reading skills in 7-year-olds: II. Strong genetic overlap. Reading and Writing, 18(5), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-0271-1
    • Hoeft, Fumiko, & Wang, Cheng. (2019). Intergenerational transmission in developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 413–438). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.019
    • Pennington, Bruce F., & Peterson, Robin L. (2015). Development of dyslexia. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 361–376). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Petrill, Stephen A., Deater-Deckard, Kirby, Thompson, Lee Ann, Schatschneider, Chris, Dethorne, Laura S., & Vendenbergh, David J. (2007). Longitudinal genetic analysis of early reading: The Western Reserve Reading Project [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9021-2
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Fishman, Joshua. (1967). Bilingualism with and without diglossia; diglossia with and without bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 29–38. Cited by10
    • Abu Elhija, Dua'a. (2014). A new writing system? Developing orthographies for writing Arabic dialects in electronic media. Writing Systems Research, 6(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.868334
    • Angermeyer, Philipp Sebastian. (2012). Bilingualism meets digraphia: Script alternation and hybridity in Russian-American writing and beyond. In Mark Sebba, Shahrzad Mahootian, & Carla Jonsson (Eds.), Language mixing and code-switching in writing: Approaches to mixed-language written discourse (Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism 2) (pp. 255–272). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1994b). Schriftlichkeit und Diglossie [Writing and diglossia]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 739–745). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, & Spolsky, Bernard. (2014). Acquiring literacy in a diglossic context: Problems and prospects. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 225–240). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Schiegg, Markus. (2013). Medieval glossators as agents of language change. In Esther-Miriam Wagner, Ben Outhwaite, & Bettina Beinhoff (Eds.), Scribes as agents of language change (Studies in Language Change 10) (pp. 39–69). Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter.
    • Sebba, Mark. (2016). The orthography of English-lexicon pidgins and creoles. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 347–364). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Stine, Philip C. (1994). Writing and religion. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 604–610). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Tsao, Feng-fu. (2008a). The language planning situation in Taiwan. In Robert B. Kaplan & Richard B. Baldauf Jr. (Eds.), Language planning and policy in Asia, Volume 1: Japan, Nepal, Taiwan and Chinese characters (Language Planning and Policy) (pp. 237–284). Bristol; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
  • Fishman, Joshua A. (1977a). Preface: Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. xi-xxviii). The Hague; Paris: Mouton. Cited by1
    • Smalley, William A. (1994a). Codification by means of foreign systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 697–708). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Fishman, Joshua A. (1977b). The phenomenological and linguistic pilgrimage of Yiddish: Some examples of functional and structural pidginization and depidginization. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 293–306). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
  • Fishman, Joshua A. (1988). Ethnocultural issues in the creation, substitution, and revision of writing systems. In B. A. Rafoth & D. L. Rubin (Eds.), The social construction of written communication (pp. 273–286). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Cited by8
    • Ashworth, Evan. (2013). Language and ideologies and orthographies: Developing a writing system for Than Ówîngeh. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New Mexico.
    • Bird, Steven. (2001). Orthography and identity in Cameroon. Written Language & Literacy, 4(2), 131–162. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.4.2.02bir [Reprinted in SIL Notes on Literacy, 26(1-2), 3–44]
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Pasch, Helma. (2008). Competing scripts: The introduction of the Roman alphabet in Africa. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 191, 65–109. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.025
    • Sebba, Mark. (2007). Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486739
    • Unseth, Peter. (2005). Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns
    • Unseth, Peter. (2008). The sociolinguistics of script choice: An introduction [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.030
  • Fishman, Joshua A. (1991). Reversing language shift. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Cited by8
    • Ashworth, Evan. (2013). Language and ideologies and orthographies: Developing a writing system for Than Ówîngeh. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New Mexico.
    • Burkhardt, Jey Lingam, & Burkhardt, Jürgen Martin. (2019). Developing a unified orthography for Berawan: An endangered Bornean language [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 280–306. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00029.bur
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Edwards, Viv. (2009). Learning to be literate: Multilingual perspectives. Bristol; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Haarmann, Harald (2006). Language planning: Graphization and the development of writing systems [Sprachplanung: Graphisation und die Entwicklung von Schreibsystemen]. In Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier, & Peter Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society [Ein internationales Handbuch zur Wissenschaft von Sprache und Gesellschaft] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistic and Communication Science 3.3) (pp. 2402–2420). Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110184181.3.11.2402
    • Herbert, Pat, & Robinson, Clinton. (1999). Another language, another literacy? Evidence from Africa. Written Language & Literacy, 2(2), 247–266.
    • Jones, Mari C., & Mooney, Damien (Eds.). (2017). Creating orthographies for endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316562949
    • Karolij, Edeltraud, & Nehr, Monika. (1996). Schriftspracherwerb unter Bedingungen der Mehrsprachigkeit [Acquisition of written language under conditions of multilingualism]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1191–1205). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Fishman, Joshua A., (Ed.). (1977). Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8). The Hague; Paris: Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110807097 Cited by24
    • Clement, Victoria. (2008). Emblems of independence: Script choice in post-Soviet Turkmenistan [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.042
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Genee, Inge. (2020). “It's written niisto but it sounds like knee stew.” Handling multiple orthographies in Blackfoot language web resources. Written Language & Literacy, 23(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00031.gen
    • Glück, Helmut. (1994). Schriften im Kontakt [Writing systems in contact]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 745–766). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Johnson, Sally. (2005). Spelling trouble? Language, ideology and the reform of German orthography. Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.1017/s004740450707025x
    • Jones, Mari C., & Mooney, Damien (Eds.). (2017). Creating orthographies for endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316562949
    • McCarthy, Suzanne. (1995). The Cree syllabary and the writing system riddle: A paradigm in crisis. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 59–75). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2018). What is natural in writing? Prolegomena to a Natural Grapholinguistics [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00010.mel
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Mountford, John. (1996). A functional classification. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 627–632). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Nerius, Dieter. (1994). Orthographieentwicklung und Orthographiereform [Development and reform of orthography]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 720–739). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Rogers, Henry. (1995). Optimal orthographies. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 31–43). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina. (2018). English compounds and their spelling (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sebba, Mark. (2007). Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486739
    • Sebba, Mark. (2009). Sociolinguistic approaches to writing systems research. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp002
    • Sirat, Colette. (1994). Handwriting and the writing hand. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 375–460). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Smalley, William A. (1994a). Codification by means of foreign systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 697–708). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Smalley, William, Chia Koua Vang, & Gnia Yee Yang. (1990). Mother of writing: The origin and development of a Hmong messianic script. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
    • Stebbins, Tonya. (2001). Emergent spelling patterns in Sm'algyax (Tsimshian, British Columbia). Written Language & Literacy, 4(2), 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.4.2.03ste
    • Weingarten, Rüdiger. (2011). Comparative graphematics [Special issue: Typology of writing systems, edited by Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 12–38. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.02wei [2013, Republished in Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Terry Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems (Benjamins current topics 51) (pp. 13–39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins]
    • Zhou, Minglang. (2001). Language policy and reforms of writing systems for minority languages in China. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 31–65.
  • Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research, 57(4), 481–506. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057004481 Cited by7
    • Adams, Anne-Marie, Simmons, Fiona, Willis, Catherine, & Pawling, Ralph. (2010). Undergraduate students’ ability to revise text effectively: relationships with topic knowledge and working memory [Special Issue:Writing development: Cognitive, sociocultural, linguistic perspectives, edited b Debra Myhill & Ros Fisher]. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01432.x
    • Beaufort, Anne, & Iñesta, Anna. (2014). Author profiles: Awareness, competence, and skills. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 141–158). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Feilke, Helmut. (1996). Die Entwicklung der Schreibfähigkeiten [The development of writing skills]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1178–1191). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Lindgren, Eva, Westum, Asbjørg, Outakoski, Hanna, & Sullivan, Kirk P. H. (2019). Revising at the leading edge: Shaping ideas or clearing up noise. In Eva Lindgren & Kirk P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (Studies in Writing 38) (pp. 346–365). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_017
    • MacArthur, Charles A., & Lembo, Leah. (2009). Strategy instruction in writing for adult literacy learners. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1021–1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9142-x
    • Midgette, Ekaterina, Haria, Priti, & MacArthur, Charles. (2008). The effects of content and audience awareness goals for revision on the persuasive essays of fifth- and eighth-grade students [Special issue: Research on writing development, practice, instruction, and assessment, edited by Steve Graham]. Reading and Writing, 21(1/2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9067-9
    • Molitor-Lübbert, Sylvie. (1996). Schreiben als mentaler und sprachlicher Prozeß [Writing as a mental and linguistic process]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1005–1027). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relationships and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_5 Cited by14
    • Brandt, Deborah. (2015). The rise of writing: Redefining mass literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Graham, Steve. (2020). Reading and writing connections: A commentary. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 313–317). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_19
    • Hooper, Stephen R., Costa, Lara-Jeane, McBee, Matthew, Anderson, Kathleen L., Yerby, Donna C., Knuth, Sean B., & Childress, Amy. (2011). Concurrent and longitudinal neuropsychological contributors to written language expression in first and second grade students [Special issue: Writing development from early to middle childhood, edited by Virgina W. Berninger, Brett Miller & Victoria J. Molfese]. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 221–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9263-x
    • Jiménez, Juan E., García, Eduardo, Naranjo, Francisco, de León, Sara C., & Hernández-Cabrera, Juan A. (2020). An analysis and comparison of three theoretical models of the reading-writing relationships in Spanish-speaking children. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 35–53). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_3
    • Kaplan, Dafna. (2013). Development of reading comprehension from middle childhood to adolescence: Distributional and qualitative analyses of two genres. Written Language & Literacy, 16(2), 208–240. https://doi.org/10.1075/wlL16.2.04kap
    • Kim, Young-Suk Grace. (2020). Interactive dynamic literacy model: An integrative theoretical framework for reading-writing relations. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 11–34). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_2
    • MacArthur, Charles A., & Lembo, Leah. (2009). Strategy instruction in writing for adult literacy learners. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1021–1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9142-x
    • McElvain, Cheryl Marie. (2010). Transactional literature circles and the reading comprehension of English learners in the mainstream classroom. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 178–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01403.x
    • Morphy, Paul, & Graham, Steve. (2012). Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: A meta-analysis of research findings. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 641–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9292-5
    • Myhill, Debra, Lines, Helen, & Jones, Susan. (2020). Writing like a reader: Developing metalinguistic understanding to support reading-writing connections. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 107–122). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_7
    • Olinghouse, Natalie G., & Leaird, Jacqueline T. (2009). The relationship between measures of vocabulary and narrative writing quality in second- and fourth-grade students. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9124-z
    • Parodi, Giovanni. (2007). Reading-writing connections: Discourse-oriented research. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9029-7
    • Stavans, Anat, Seroussi, Batia, Rigbi, Amihai, & Zadunaisky-Ehrlich, Sara. (2020). The contribution of reading abilities to the writing quality of expository text structure in Hebrew speaking elementary school children. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 123–145). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_8
    • Uppstad, Per Henning, Solheim, Oddny Judith, & Skaftun , Atle. (2020). The reading – writing connection in assessment of reading comprehension. Exploring the role of a communicative aspect of writing. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 243–262). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_16
  • Fitzsimmons G., & Drieghe D. (2011). The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading. Psychonomic Bulleting & Review, 18(4), 736–741. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0105-x Cited by4
    • Cutter, Michael G., Drieghe, Denis, & Liversedge, Simon P. (2015). How is information integrated across fixations in reading? In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 245–260). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Halderman, Laura K., Ashby, Jane, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2012). Phonology: An early and integral role in identifying words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 207–228). London: Psychology Press.
    • Hermena, Ehab W., Bouamama, Sana, Liversedge, Simon P., & Drieghe, Denis. (2021). Does diacritics-based lexical disambiguation modulate word frequency, length, and predictability effects? An eye-movements investigation of processing Arabic diacritics. PLoS ONE, 16(11), e0259987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259987
    • Vitrano-Wilson, Seth. (2016). Reading syllable-spaced versus word-spaced text in Hmong Daw: Breaking up isn't so hard to do. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1225562
  • Flaherty, Mary. (1997). The role of abstract visual memory in the learning of kanji reading. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 389–399). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. Cited by1
    • Mori, Yoshiko. (2012). Five myths about kanji and kanji learning. Japanese Language and Literature, 46, 143–169.
  • Fleisher, L. S., Jenkins, J. R., & Pany, D. (1979). Effects on poor readers' comprehension of training in rapid decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 30–48. Cited by5
    • Berends, Inez E., & Reitsma, Pieter. (2006). Remediation of fluency: Word specific or generalised training effects? Reading and Writing, 19(3), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5259-3
    • LeVasseur, Valerie Marciarille, Macaruso, Paul, & Shankweiler, Donald. (2008). Promoting gains in reading fluency: A comparison of three approaches. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9070-1
    • Martin-Chang, Sandra Lyn, & Levy, Betty Ann. (2005). Fluency transfer: Differential gains in reading speed and accuracy following isolated word and context training. Reading and Writing, 18(4), 343–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-0668-x
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
  • Fleming, Juliet. (2016). Cultural graphology: Writing after Derrida. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Cited by2
    • Bodel, John, & Houston, Stephen (Eds.). (2021). The hidden language of graphic signs: Cryptic writing and meaningful marks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886505
    • Boeckeler, Erika Mary. (2017). Playful letters: A study in early modern alphabetics. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
  • Flesch, R. F. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221–233. Cited by5
    • Bailin, Alan, & Grafstein, Ann. (2016). Readability: Text and context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Gibson, Eleanor J., & Levin, Harry. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Harrison, Colin. (1986). New directions in text research and readability. In Asher Cashdan (Ed.), Literacy: Teaching and learning language skills (pp. 61–81). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • McNeil, Levi. (2011). Investigating the contributions of background knowledge and reading comprehension strategies to L2 reading comprehension: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing, 24(8), 883–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9230-6
    • Wright, Patricia. (1980). Usability: The criterion for designing written information (Tutorial paper). In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 183–205). New York; London: Plenum Press.
  • Flesch, R. (1955). Why Johnny can't read: And what you can do about it. New York: Harper & Brothers. Cited by6
    • Chartier, A.-M. (2009). The teaching of literacy skills in Western Europe: An historical perspective. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 451–467). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Connor, Carol McDonald. (2016a). Using cognitive development research to inform literacy instruction and improve practice in the classroom. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 166–185). London; New York: Routledge.
    • McGuinness, Diane. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Rasinski, Timothy. (2000). [Book review: Catherine E. Snow, M. Susan Burns, & Peg Griffin (Eds.), (1998), Preventing reading difficulties in young children]. Written Language & Literacy, 3(2), 281–285.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stubbs, Michael. (1980). Language and literacy: The sociolinguistics of reading and writing. London; Boston; Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Fletcher, J. M., Satz, P., & Scholes, R. J. (1981). Developmental changes in the linguistic performance correlates of reading achievement. Brain and Language, 13, 78–90. Cited by4
    • Leikin, Mark, & Assayag-Bouskila, Orit. (2004). Expression of syntactic complexity in sentence comprehension: A comparison between dyslexic and regular readers [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 801–821.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • So, Dominica, & Siegel, Linda S. (1997). Learning to read Chinese: Semantic, syntactic, phonological and working memory skills in normally achieving and poor Chinese readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007963513853
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Liberman, I. Y., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., Fowler, A. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.6 Cited by17
    • Blachman, Benita A., Tangel, Darlene M., Ball, Eileen Wynne, Black, Rochella, & McGraw, Colleen K. (1999). Developing phonological awareness and word recognition skills: A two-year intervention with low-income, inner-city children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 239–273. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008050403932
    • Frost, Stephen J., Sandak, Rebecca, Mencl, W. Einar, Landi, Nicole, Moore, Dina, Della Porta, Gina, Rueckl, Jay G., Katz, Leonard, & Pugh, Kenneth R. (2008). Neurobiological and behavioral studies of skilled and impaired word reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 355–376). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Keenan, Janice M., & Betjemann, Rebecca S. (2008a). Comprehension of single words: The role of semantics in word identification and reading disability. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 191–210). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • McBride, Catherine. (2017). Early literacy across languages. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 55–74). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Pennington, Bruce F., Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, Green, Phyllis A., & Lefly, Dianne L. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 707–755.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Fowler, Anne E. (2004). Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(5), 483–515. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044598.81628.e6
    • Share, David L., Jorm, Anthony F., MacLean, Rod, & Matthews, Russell. (2002). Temporal processing and reading disability [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 151–178.
    • Share, David L., & Shalev, Carmit. (2004). Self-teaching in normal and disabled readers [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 769–800.
    • Shuai, Lan, Frost, Stephen J., Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Neurocognitive markers of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 277–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.013
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Stringer, Ron, & Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). The connection between reaction time and variation in reading ability: Unravelling covariance relationships with cognitive ability and phonological sensitivity. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(1), 41–53.
    • Torgesen, Joseph K., Wagner, Richard K., Rashotte, Carol A., Burgess, Stephen, & Hecht, Stephen. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second-to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_4
    • Tunmer, William E. (2008). Recent developments in reading intervention research: Introduction to the special issue [Special issue: Recent developments in reading intervention research, edited by William E. Tunmer]. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9108-4
    • Vellutino, Frank R., Scanlon, Donna M., Zhang, Haiyan, & Schatschneider, Christopher. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties [Special issue: Recent developments in reading intervention research, edited by William E. Tunmer]. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 437–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9098-2
    • Wolf, Maryanne, O'Rourke, Alyssa Goldberg, Gidney, Calvin, Lovett, Maureen, Cirino, Paul, & Morris, Robin. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013816320290
  • Fletcher-Flinn, Claire M., Shankweiler, Donald, & Frost, Stephen J. (2004). Coordination of reading and spelling in early literacy development: An examination of the discrepancy hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 617–644. Cited by3
    • Bekebrede, Judith, van der Leij, Aryan, & Share, David L. (2009). Dutch dyslexic adolescents: Phonological-core variable-orthographic differences. Reading and Writing, 22(2), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9105-7
    • Thompson, G. Brian, McKay, Michael F., Fletcher-Flinn, Claire M., Connelly, Vincent, Kaa, Richard T., & Ewing, Jason. (2008). Do children who acquire word reading without explicit phonics employ compensatory learning? Issues of phonological recoding, lexical orthography, and fluency. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 505–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9075-9
    • Wijayathilake. M. A. D. K., & Parrila. R. (2014). Predictors of word reading skills in good and struggling readers in Sinhala [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.846844
  • Fletcher-Flinn, Claire M., Thompson, G. Brian, Yamada, Megumi, & Naka, Makiko. (2011). The acquisition of phoneme awareness in children learning the hiragana syllabary [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9257-8 Cited by2
    • Mori, Yoshiko. (2012). Five myths about kanji and kanji learning. Japanese Language and Literature, 46, 143–169.
    • Nakamura, Pooja R., Koda, Keiko, & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2014). Biliteracy acquisition in Kannada and English: A developmental study [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855620
  • Flores d'Arcais, Giovanni B. (1992). Graphemic, phonological and semantic activation processes during the recognition of Chinese characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 37–66). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. Cited by10
    • Chikamatsu, Nobuko. (2005). L2 Japanese kanji memory and retrieval: An experiment on the tip-of-the-pen (TOP) phenomenon. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 71–96). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Flores d'Arcais, Giovanni B. (1992). Graphemic, phonological and semantic activation processes during the recognition of Chinese characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 37–66). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2004). Modeling the Japanese mental lexicon: Morphological, orthographic and phonological considerations. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in Psychological Research: Volume 31 (pp. 27–61). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
    • Joyce, Terry, & Masuda, Hisashi. (2018). Introduction to the multi-script Japanese writing system and word processing. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 179–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Li, Hong, &Chen, Hsuan-Chih. (1997). Processing of radicals in Chinese character recognition. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 141–160). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Mori, Yoshiko. (2012). Five myths about kanji and kanji learning. Japanese Language and Literature, 46, 143–169.
    • Pak, Ada K. H., Cheng-Lai, Alice, Tso, Ivy F., Shu, Hua, Lia, Wenling, & Anderson, Richard C. (2005). Visual chunking skills of Hong Kong children. Reading and Writing, 18(5), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-6575-3
    • Wang, Hsiao-Lan Sharon, Huss, Martina, Hämäläinen, Jarmo A., & Goswami, Usha. (2012). Basic auditory processing and developmental dyslexia in Chinese. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 509–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9284-5
    • Yamada, Jun, & Takashima, Hiroomi. (2001). The semantic effect on retrieval of radicals in logographic characters. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1/2), 179–194.
  • Flores d'Arcais, G. B., Saito, H., & Kawakami, M. (1995). Phonological and semantic activation in reading kanji characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21(1), 34–42. Cited by10
    • Chikamatsu, Nobuko. (2005). L2 Japanese kanji memory and retrieval: An experiment on the tip-of-the-pen (TOP) phenomenon. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 71–96). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Flores d'Arcais, Giovanni B. (1992). Graphemic, phonological and semantic activation processes during the recognition of Chinese characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 37–66). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Joyce, Terry, & Masuda, Hisashi. (2018). Introduction to the multi-script Japanese writing system and word processing. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 179–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Kess, Joseph F., & Miyamoto, Tadao. (1999). The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Li, Hong, &Chen, Hsuan-Chih. (1997). Processing of radicals in Chinese character recognition. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 141–160). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Matsunaga, Sachiko. (2016). Teaching and learning to read kanji as L2: Why are they difficult? In Jun Xing, & Pak-sheung Ng (Eds.), Indigenous culture, education and globalization: Critical perspectives from Asia (pp. 245–262). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48159-2_13
    • Saito, H., Masuda, H., & Kawakami, M. (1998). Form and sound similarity effects in kanji recognition [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 323–357. [Also published as Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 169–203). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Yamada, Jun, & Takashima, Hiroomi. (2001). The semantic effect on retrieval of radicals in logographic characters. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1/2), 179–194.
    • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1999b). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837.
  • Flores d'Arcais, G. B., Saito, H., Kawakami, M., & Masuda, H. (1994). Figural and phonological effects in radical migration with kanji characters. In H.-W. Chang, J.-T. Huang, C.-W. Hue, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Advances in the study of Chinese language processing: Volume 1 (pp. 241–254). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University. Cited by4
    • Chikamatsu, Nobuko. (2005). L2 Japanese kanji memory and retrieval: An experiment on the tip-of-the-pen (TOP) phenomenon. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 71–96). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Kess, Joseph F., & Miyamoto, Tadao. (1999). The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Li, Hong, &Chen, Hsuan-Chih. (1997). Processing of radicals in Chinese character recognition. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 141–160). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Saito, Hirofumi, Kawakami, Masahiro, Masuda, Hisashi, & Flores d'Arcais, Giovanni B. (1997). Contributions of radical components to kanji character recognition and recall. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 109–140). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  • Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011). The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies? Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6 Cited by6
    • Ahmed, Yusra, & Wagner, Richard K. (2020). A “simple” illustration of a joint model of reading and writing using meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM). In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 55–75). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_4
    • Kim, Young-Suk Grace. (2020). Interactive dynamic literacy model: An integrative theoretical framework for reading-writing relations. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 11–34). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_2
    • McClung, Nicola A., & Pearson, P. David. (2019). Reading comprehension across languages: Seven European orthographies and two international literacy assessments. Written Language & Literacy, 22(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00019.mcc
    • Nakamura, Pooja R., Koda, Keiko, & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2014). Biliteracy acquisition in Kannada and English: A developmental study [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855620
    • Sadeghi, Amir, Everatt, John, & McNeill, Brigid. (2016). A simple model of Persian reading. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.1003768
    • Singh, Nandini Chatterjee, & Sumathi, T. A. (2019). The role of phonological processing and oral language in the acquisition of reading skills in Devanagari. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 261–276). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_14
  • Flouda, Georgia. (2013). Materiality of Minoan writing: Modes of display and perception. In Kathryn E. Piquette & Ruth D. Whitehouse (Eds.), Writing as material practice: Substance, surface and medium (pp. 143–174). London: Ubiquity Press. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai.h Cited by4
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Ferrara, Silvia, & Jasink, Anna Margherita. (2017). To have and to hold: Hieroglyphic seals as personal markers and objects of display. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 41–53). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Schoep, Ilse. (2017). The role of non-written communication in Minoan administrative practices. In Anna Margherita Jasink, Judith Weingarten, & Silvia Ferrara (Eds.), Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and surrounding areas: The semantics of a-literate and proto-literate media (seals, potmarks, mason's marks, seal-impressed pottery, ideograms and logograms, and related systems) (Strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca 196) (pp. 81–97). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
    • Steele, Philippa M. (2020a). Material entanglements of writing practices in the Bronze Age Aegean and Cyprus. Sustainability, 12, 10671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410671
  • Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–49). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by12
    • Alamargot, Denis, Lambert, Eric, Thebault, Claire, & Dansac, Christophe. (2007). Text composition by deaf and hearing middle-school students: The role of working memory. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9033-y
    • Antos, Gerd. (1996). Die Produktion schriftlicher Texte [The production of written texts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1527–1535). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Babayiğit, Selma, & Stainthorp, Rhona. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y
    • Beaufort, Anne, & Iñesta, Anna. (2014). Author profiles: Awareness, competence, and skills. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 141–158). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Beers, Scott F., Quinlan, Thomas, & Harbaugh, Allen G. (2010). Adolescent students' reading during writing behaviors and relationships with text quality: An eyetracking study [Special issue: Reading during writing. What does eyetracking research tell us about the interaction between reading and writing processes during text production?, edited by Luuk Van Waes, Mariëlle, Leijten, & Åsa Wengelin]. Reading and Writing, 23(7), 743–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9193-7
    • Eigler, Gunther. (1996). Methoden der Textproduktionsforschung [Research methods in the psychology of writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 992–1004). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Kellogg, Ronald T. (1994). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Kulikowich, Jonna M., Mason, Linda H., & Brown, Scott W. (2008). Evaluating fifth- and sixth-grade students' expository writing: Task development, scoring, and psychometric issues [Special issue: Research on writing development, practice, instruction, and assessment, edited by Steve Graham]. Reading and Writing, 21(1/2), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9068-8
    • Martlew, Margaret. (1983). The development of writing: Communication and cognition. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 257–275). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Midgette, Ekaterina, Haria, Priti, & MacArthur, Charles. (2008). The effects of content and audience awareness goals for revision on the persuasive essays of fifth- and eighth-grade students [Special issue: Research on writing development, practice, instruction, and assessment, edited by Steve Graham]. Reading and Writing, 21(1/2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9067-9
    • Viollet, Catherine. (1994). Schriftlichkeit und Literatur [Writing and literature]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 658–672). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Wagner. Richard K., Puranik, Cynthia S., Foorman, Barbara, Foster, Elizabeth, Wilson, Laura Gehron, Tschinkel, Erika, & Kantor, Patricia Thatcher. (2011). Modeling the development of written language [Special issue: Writing development from early to middle childhood, edited by Virgina W. Berninger, Brett Miller & Victoria J. Molfese]. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7
  • Flower, Linda S., & Hayes, John R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600 Cited by20
    • Ailhaud, Emilie, Chenu, Florence, & Jisa, Harriet. (2016). A developmental perspective on the units of written French. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 287–305). Cham: Springer.
    • Aldridge, Michelle, & Fontaine, Lise. (2019). Using keystroke logging to capture the impact of cognitive complexity and typing fluency on written language production. In Eva Lindgren & Kirk P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (Studies in Writing 38) (pp. 285–305). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_014
    • Beaufort, Anne, & Iñesta, Anna. (2014). Author profiles: Awareness, competence, and skills. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 141–158). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Bécotte-Boutin, Hélène-Sarah, Caporossi, Gilles, Hertz, Alain, & Leblay, Christophe. (2019). Writing and rewriting: The coloured numerical visualization of keystroke logging. In Eva Lindgren & Kirk P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (Studies in Writing 38) (pp. 96–124). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_006
    • Breuer, Esther Odilia. (2019). Fluency in L1 and FL writing: An analysis of planning, essay writing and final revision. In Eva Lindgren & Kirk P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (Studies in Writing 38) (pp. 190–211). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_010
    • Donahue, Christiane, & Lillis, Theresa. (2014). Models of writing and text production. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 55–78). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Jacobs, Geert, & Perrin, Daniel. (2014). Production modes: Writing as materializing and stimulating thoughts. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 181–208). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Jakobs, Eva-Maria, & Spinuzzi, Clay. (2014b). Professional domains: Writing as creation of economic value. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 359–384). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Kim, Young-Suk Grace. (2020). Interactive dynamic literacy model: An integrative theoretical framework for reading-writing relations. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 11–34). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_2
    • Leijten,Mariëlle, Van Waes, Luuk, & Van Horenbeeck, Eric. (2015). Analyzing writing process data: A linguistic perspective. In Georgeta Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface (pp. 277–302). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.14lei
    • Leyva, Diana, Hopson, Sarah, & Nichols, Ashley. (2012). Reading a note, reading a mind: children's notating skills and understanding of mind. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9296-9
    • Lillis, Theresa. (2013). The sociolinguistics of writing (Edinburgh Sociolinguistics). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    • Linnemann, Markus. (2019). Anticipation of audience during writing. In Eva Lindgren & Kirk P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (Studies in Writing 38) (pp. 326–345). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_016
    • Mahlow, Cerstin, & Dale, Robert. (2014). Production media: Writing as using tools in media convergent environments. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 209–230). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Manchón, Rosa M. (2010). [Book review: Mark Torrance, Luuk Van Waes & David Galbraith (Eds.), (2007), Writing and cognition: Research and applications]. Written Language & Literacy, 13(2), 282–286. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.2.07man
    • Münch, Christian, & Noack, Christina. (2020). From the oral-literate debate to the translanguaging paradigm – and back again: A German perspective on multilingual writing strategies [Special issue: Literacies in contact, edited by Constanze Weth & Manuela Böhm, in collaboration Daniel Bunčić]. Written Language & Literacy, 23(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00041.mun
    • Prior, Paul A. (2015). Writing, literate activity, semiotic remediation: A sociocultural approach. In Georgeta Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface (pp. 185–201). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.10pri
    • Prior, Paul, & Thorne, Steven L. (2014). Research paradigms: Beyond product, process, and social activity. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL] 10) (pp. 31–54). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    • Ravid, Dorit, Shalom, Tsila, Dattner, Elitzur, Katzenberger, Irit, & Sha'shoua, Guy. (2016). Top-down measures in 7th grade writing: The effects of genre and SES. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado, & Naymé Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky (Literacy Studies 11) (pp. 345–359). Cham: Springer.
    • Tiryakioglu, Gulay, Peters, Elke, & Verschaffel, Lieven. (2019). The effect of L2 proficiency level on composing processes of EFL learners: Data from keystroke loggings, think alouds and questionnaires. In Eva Lindgren & Kirk P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (Studies in Writing 38) (pp. 212–235). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_011
  • Floyd, Randy G., Bergeron, Renee, & Alfonso, Vincent C. (2006). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive ability profiles of poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 19(5), 427–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9002-5
  • Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faulty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cited by26
    • Akamatsu, Nobuhiko. (1999). The effects of first language orthographic features on word recognition processing in English as a second language [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008053520326
    • Andrews, Sally. (2006b). All about words: A lexicalist perspective on reading. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 318–347). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Andrews, Sally, & Bond, Rachel. (2009). Lexical expertise and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down processing of lexical ambiguity [Special issue: Lexical representations in reading and writing, edited by Joanne Arciuli]. Reading and Writing, 22(6), 687–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9137-7
    • Balota, David A., & Yap, Melvin J. (2006). Attentional control and the flexible lexical processor: Explorations of the magic moment of word recognition. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 229–258). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Davis, Chris, & Kim, Jeesun. (2006). Changing circumstance: How flexible is lexical access? In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 207–228). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Henderson, Edmund H. (1992). The interface of lexical competence and knowledge of written words. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 1–30). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Inhoff, Albrecht W., & Rayner, Keith. (1996). Das Blickverhalten beim Lesen [Eye movements during reading]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 942–957). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Leong, Che Kan, & Ho, Man Koon. (2008). The role of lexical knowledge and related linguistic components in typical and poor language comprehenders of Chinese. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9113-7
    • Li, Ping, & Yip, Michael C. (1998). Context effects and the processing of spoken homophones [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 223–243. [Also pulished in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 69–89). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Linell, Per. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations (Routledge Advances in Communication and Linguistic Theory). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Lumsden, Charles J. (1988). Gene-culture coevolution: Culture and biology in Darwinian perspective. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 17–42). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Magnuson, James S. (2008). Nondeterminism, pleiotropy, and single-word reading: Theoretical and practical concerns. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 377–404). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Mattingly, Ignatius G. (1992). Linguistic awareness and orthographic form. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 11–26). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Seidenberg, Mark S., & Plaut, David C. (2006). Progress in understanding word reading: Data fitting versus theory building. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 25–49). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Shillcock, Richard. (2007). Eye movements and visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Singer, Murray, Henderson, John M., & Ferreira, Fernanda. (1995). Reading and language processing: Paradigms, proposals, and procedures. In John M. Henderson, Murray Singer, & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 1–4). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Staub, Adrian. (2015). Reading sentences: Syntactic parsing and semantic interpretation. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 202–216). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Stringer, Ron, & Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). The connection between reaction time and variation in reading ability: Unravelling covariance relationships with cognitive ability and phonological sensitivity. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(1), 41–53.
    • Templeton, Shane, & Bear, Donald R. (1992). A summary and synthesis: “Teaching the lexicon to read and spell”. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Tolchinsky, Liliana. (2009). The configuration of literacy as a domain of knowledge. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 468–486). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Will, Udo, Nottbusch, Guido, & Weingarten, Rüdiger. (2006). Linguistic units in word typing: Effects of word presentation modes and typing delay [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.10wil
  • Földes-Papp, K. (1966). Vom Felsbild zum Alphabet. Stuttgart. Cited by5
    • Brekle, Herbert E. (1994b). Die Buchstabenformen westlicher Alphabetschriften in ihrer historischen Entwicklung [The development of letter forms in western alphabets]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 171–204). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110111293.1.2.171
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1984). A history of writing. London: British Library. [1987, Second edition; 1992, Third revised edition, London: British Library; New York: Abbeville Press]
    • Jensen, Hans. (1935). Die Schrift in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Glückstadt; Hamburg: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften VEB. [1958, Second edition; 1968, Third edition; 1969, Sign, symbol and script: An account of man's efforts to write (Translated by George Unwin). London: George Allen & Unwin; New York: Putman's]
    • Stetter, Christian. (1994). Orthographie als Normierung des Schriftsystems [Orthography as a norm for the writing system]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 687–697). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Folk, J. R. (1999). Phonological codes are used to access the lexicon during silent reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 892–906. Cited by6
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2015). The work of the eyes during reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 44–59). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
  • Folk, J. R., & Morris, R. K. (1995). Multiple lexical codes in reading: Evidence from eye movements, naming time, and oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1412–1429. Cited by6
    • Binder, Katherine, & Borecki, Caren. (2008). The use of phonological, orthographic, and contextual information during reading: A comparison of adults who are learning to read and skilled adult readers. Reading and Writing, 21(8), 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9099-1
    • Jones, Lara L., & Estes, Zachary. (2012). Lexical priming: Associative, semantic, and thematic influences on word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 44–72). London: Psychology Press.
    • Kessler, Brett, & Treiman, Rebecca. (2015). Writing systems: Their properties and implications for reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 10–25). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Pollatsek, Alexander. (2015). The role of sound in silent reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 185–201). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
  • Foorman, Barbara R., Chen, Dung-Tsa, Carlson, Coleen, Moats, Louisa, Francis, David J., & Fletcher, Jack M. (2003). The necessity of the alphabetic principle to phonemic awareness instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 289–324. Cited by5
    • Ahmed, Yusra, Wagner, Richard K., & Kantor, Patricia Thatcher. (2012). How visual word recognition is affected by developmental dyslexia. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 196–215). London: Psychology Press.
    • Moats, Louisa, Foorman, Barbara, & Taylor, Patrick. (2006). How quality of writing instruction impacts high-risk fourth graders' writing. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 363–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4944-6
    • Piasta, Shayne B., & Wagner, Richard K. (2008). Dyslexia: Identification and classification. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 309–326). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Stringer, Ronald W., Toplak, Maggie E., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2004). Differential relationships between RAN performance, behaviour ratings, and executive function measures: Searching for a double dissociation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 891–914.
    • Wagner, Richard K., Piasta, Shayne B., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (2006). Learning to read. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 1111–1142). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
  • Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Lynn, A. (1996). Relation of phonological and orthographic processing to early reading: Comparing two approaches to regression-based, reading-level-match designs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 639–652. Cited by6
    • Burt, Jennifer S., & Fury, Mary B. (2000). Spelling in adults: The role of reading skills and experience. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 1–30.
    • Kroese, Judith M., Hynd, George W., Knight, Deborah F., Hiemenz, Jennifer R., & Hall, Josh. (2000). Clinical appraisal of spelling ability and its relationship to phonemic awareness (blending, segmenting, elision, and reversal), phonological memory, and reading in reading disabled, ADHD, and normal children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 105–131.
    • Morfidi, Eleni, van der Leij, Aryan, de Jong, Peter F., Scheltinga, Femke, & Bekebrede, Judith. (2007). Reading in two orthographies: A cross-linguistic study of Dutch average and poor readers who learn English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 753–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9035-9
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Samuelsson, Stefan, Gustavsson, Ann, Herkner, Birgitta, & Lundberg, Ingvar. (2000). Is the frequency of dyslexic problems among prison inmates higher than in a normal population? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 297–312.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.37 Cited by27
    • Catts, Hugh W. (2017). Early identification of reading disabilities. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 311–331). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Compton, Donald L. (2000). Modeling the growth of decoding skills in first-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(3), 219–259.
    • Connor, Carol McDonald. (2016a). Using cognitive development research to inform literacy instruction and improve practice in the classroom. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 166–185). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Connor, Carol McDonald, & Morrison, Frederick J. (2017). Child characteristics by instruction interactions, literacy, and implications for theory and practice. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 507–524). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (2006). Alphabetics instruction helps students learn to read. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 649–677). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Foorman, Barbara R., Chen, Dung-Tsa, Carlson, Coleen, Moats, Louisa, Francis, David J., & Fletcher, Jack M. (2003). The necessity of the alphabetic principle to phonemic awareness instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 289–324.
    • Frost, Stephen J., Sandak, Rebecca, Mencl, W. Einar, Landi, Nicole, Moore, Dina, Della Porta, Gina, Rueckl, Jay G., Katz, Leonard, & Pugh, Kenneth R. (2008). Neurobiological and behavioral studies of skilled and impaired word reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 355–376). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Hatcher, Peter J. (2000). Reading intervention need not be negligible: Response to Cossu (1999). Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 349–355.
    • Hintikka, Sini, Aro, Mikko, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2005). Computerized training of the correspondences between phonological and orthographic units [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 155–178.
    • Lau, Lily H.-S., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2005). Phonological awareness and spelling skill development in bilingual biscriptal children. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (357–371). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Mansion, Andre D., Connor, Carol McDonald, & Duncan, Greg J. (2016). Policy and community influences on learning to read. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 149–165). London; New York: Routledge.
    • McGuinness, Diane. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Moats, Louisa, Foorman, Barbara, & Taylor, Patrick. (2006). How quality of writing instruction impacts high-risk fourth graders' writing. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 363–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4944-6
    • Morrison, Frederick J., Connor, Carol MacDonald, & Hindman, Annemarie. (2010). Early schooling and growth of literacy in the transition to school. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 153–164). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_11
    • O'Connor, Rollanda E., & Padeliadu, Susana. (2000). Blending versus whole word approaches in first grade remedial reading: Short-term and delayed effects on reading and spelling words. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 159–182.
    • Piasta, Shayne B., & Wagner, Richard K. (2008). Dyslexia: Identification and classification. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 309–326). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rasinski, Timothy. (2000). [Book review: Catherine E. Snow, M. Susan Burns, & Peg Griffin (Eds.), (1998), Preventing reading difficulties in young children]. Written Language & Literacy, 3(2), 281–285.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Romain, Melissa A., Millner, Keith A., Moss, Victoria E., & Held, Marguerite. (2007). The effectiveness of classroom-based instructional assessments for progress monitoring purposes in Texas Reading First schools. Reading and Writing, 20(6), 619–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9057-y
    • Royer, James M., & Walles, Rena. (2008). Fluency training as an alternative intervention for reading-disabled and poor readers. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 327–353). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Fowler, Anne E. (2004). Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(5), 483–515. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044598.81628.e6
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Tunmer, William E. (2008). Recent developments in reading intervention research: Introduction to the special issue [Special issue: Recent developments in reading intervention research, edited by William E. Tunmer]. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9108-4
    • Vadasy, Patricia F., & Sanders, Elizabeth A. (2008). Code-oriented instruction for kindergarten students at risk for reading difficulties: A replication and comparison of instructional groupings. Reading and Writing, 21(9), 929–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9119-9
    • Wagner, Richard K., Piasta, Shayne B., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (2006). Learning to read. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 1111–1142). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Wesseling, Ralph, & Reitsma, Pieter. (2000). The transient role of explicit phonological recoding for reading acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 313–336.
  • Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Novy, D. M., & Liberman, D. (1991). How letter-sound instruction mediates progress in first-grade reading and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 456–469. Cited by10
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, & Sparks, Erin. (2015). Children's spelling development: Theories and evidence. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 311–325). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (2006). Alphabetics instruction helps students learn to read. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 649–677). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goikietxea, Edurne. (2005). Levels of phonological awareness in preliterate and literate Spanish-speaking children. Reading and Writing, 18(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-1955-7
    • Parkard, Jerome, Chen, Xi, Li, Wenling, Wu, Xinchun, Gaffney, Janet S., Li, Hong, & Anderson, Richard C. (2006). Explicit instruction in orthographic structure and word morphology helps Chinese children learn to write characters. Reading and Writing, 19(5), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9003-4
    • Piasta, Shayne B., & Wagner, Richard K. (2008). Dyslexia: Identification and classification. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 309–326). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Thompson, G. Brian, & Johnston, Rhona S. (2000). Are nonword and other phonological deficits indicative of a failed reading process? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 63–97.
    • Wagner, Richard K., Piasta, Shayne B., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (2006). Learning to read. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 1111–1142). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
  • Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1997). The case for early reading intervention. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 243–264). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by8
    • Blachman, Benita A., Tangel, Darlene M., Ball, Eileen Wynne, Black, Rochella, & McGraw, Colleen K. (1999). Developing phonological awareness and word recognition skills: A two-year intervention with low-income, inner-city children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 239–273. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008050403932
    • Brady, Susan, Gillis, Margie, Smith, Tara, Lavalette, MaryEllen, Liss-Bronstein, Linda, Lowe, Evelyn, North, Wendy, Russo, Evelyn, & Wilder, T. Diane. (2009). First grade teachers' knowledge of phonological awareness and code concepts: Examining gains from an intensive form of professional development and corresponding teacher attitudes [Special issue: Perspectives on teachers' disciplinary knowledge of reading processes, development, and pedagogy, edited by Anne Cunningham & Jamie Zibulsky]. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 425–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9166-x
    • Compton, Donald L. (2000). Modeling the growth of decoding skills in first-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(3), 219–259.
    • Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2010). Role of orthography in literacy acquisition and literacy problems among monolinguals and bilinguals. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 167–176). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_12
    • Moats, Louisa, Foorman, Barbara, & Taylor, Patrick. (2006). How quality of writing instruction impacts high-risk fourth graders' writing. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 363–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4944-6
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Fowler, Anne E. (2004). Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(5), 483–515. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044598.81628.e6
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Wolf, Maryanne, O'Rourke, Alyssa Goldberg, Gidney, Calvin, Lovett, Maureen, Cirino, Paul, & Morris, Robin. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013816320290
  • Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Winikates, D. Mehta, P., Schatschneider, C., & Fletcher, J. M. (1997). Early interventions for children with reading disabilities. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 255–276. Cited by4
    • Aaron, P. G., Joshi, R. M., Ayotollah, Mahboobeh, Ellsberry, Annie, Henderson, Janet, & Lindsey, Kim. (1999). Decoding and sight-word naming: Are they independent components of word recognition skill? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(2), 89–127.
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (2006). Alphabetics instruction helps students learn to read. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 649–677). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Jacobson, Christer, & Lundberg, Ingvar. (2000). Early prediction of individual growth in reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 273–296.
    • Share, David L., & Shalev, Carmit. (2004). Self-teaching in normal and disabled readers [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 769–800.
  • Foorman, B. R., & Moats, L. C. (2004). Conditions for sustaining research-based practices in early reading instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250010601 Cited by8
    • Al Otaiba, Stephanie, Lake, Vickie E., Greulich, Luana, Folsom, Jessica S. & Guidry, Lisa. (2012). Preparing beginning reading teachers: An experimental comparison of initial early literacy field experiences. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9250-2
    • Brady, Susan, Gillis, Margie, Smith, Tara, Lavalette, MaryEllen, Liss-Bronstein, Linda, Lowe, Evelyn, North, Wendy, Russo, Evelyn, & Wilder, T. Diane. (2009). First grade teachers' knowledge of phonological awareness and code concepts: Examining gains from an intensive form of professional development and corresponding teacher attitudes [Special issue: Perspectives on teachers' disciplinary knowledge of reading processes, development, and pedagogy, edited by Anne Cunningham & Jamie Zibulsky]. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 425–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9166-x
    • Carlisle, Joanne F., Correnti, Richard, Phelps, Geoffrey, & Zeng, Ji. (2009). Exploration of the contribution of teachers' knowledge about reading to their students' improvement in reading [Special issue: Perspectives on teachers' disciplinary knowledge of reading processes, development, and pedagogy, edited by Anne Cunningham & Jamie Zibulsky]. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 457–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9165-y
    • Cunningham, Anne E., & O'Donnell, Colleen Ryan. (2015). Teachers' knowledge about beginning reading development and instruction. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 447–462). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Cunningham, Anne, Zibulsky, Jamie, & Callahan, Mia D. (2009). Starting small: Building preschool teacher knowledge that supports early literacy development [Special issue: Perspectives on teachers' disciplinary knowledge of reading processes, development, and pedagogy, edited by Anne Cunningham & Jamie Zibulsky]. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9164-z
    • Foorman, Barbara R., Chen, Dung-Tsa, Carlson, Coleen, Moats, Louisa, Francis, David J., & Fletcher, Jack M. (2003). The necessity of the alphabetic principle to phonemic awareness instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 289–324.
    • Moats, Louisa. (2009). Knowledge foundations for teaching reading and spelling [Special issue: Perspectives on teachers' disciplinary knowledge of reading processes, development, and pedagogy, edited by Anne Cunningham & Jamie Zibulsky]. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9162-1
    • Moats, Louisa, Foorman, Barbara, & Taylor, Patrick. (2006). How quality of writing instruction impacts high-risk fourth graders' writing. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 363–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4944-6
  • Foorman, B. R., Schatschneider, C., Eakin, M. N., Fletcher, J. M., Moats, L. C., & Francis, D. J. (2006). The impact of instructional practices in grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.11.003 Cited by5
    • Brady, Susan, Gillis, Margie, Smith, Tara, Lavalette, MaryEllen, Liss-Bronstein, Linda, Lowe, Evelyn, North, Wendy, Russo, Evelyn, & Wilder, T. Diane. (2009). First grade teachers' knowledge of phonological awareness and code concepts: Examining gains from an intensive form of professional development and corresponding teacher attitudes [Special issue: Perspectives on teachers' disciplinary knowledge of reading processes, development, and pedagogy, edited by Anne Cunningham & Jamie Zibulsky]. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 425–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9166-x
    • Connor, Carol McDonald, & Morrison, Frederick J. (2017). Child characteristics by instruction interactions, literacy, and implications for theory and practice. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 507–524). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Denton, Carolyn A., Swanson, Elizabeth A., & Mathes, Patricia G. (2007). Assessment-based instructional coaching provided to reading intervention teachers. Reading and Writing, 20(6), 569–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9055-0
    • Moats, Louisa. (2009). Knowledge foundations for teaching reading and spelling [Special issue: Perspectives on teachers' disciplinary knowledge of reading processes, development, and pedagogy, edited by Anne Cunningham & Jamie Zibulsky]. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9162-1
    • Moats, Louisa, Foorman, Barbara, & Taylor, Patrick. (2006). How quality of writing instruction impacts high-risk fourth graders' writing. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 363–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4944-6
  • Foorman, Barbara R., York, Mary, Santi, Kristi L., & Francis, David. (2008). Contextual effects on predicting risk for reading difficulties in first and second grade [Special issue: Recent developments in reading intervention research, edited by William E. Tunmer]. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9079-5
  • Ford, Cecilia E. (1992). Variation in the intonation and punctuation of different adverbial clause types in spoken and written English. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 3–16). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Fordham, Paul E. (1994). The promotion of literacy in the “third world”. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 779–790). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Foreman, Grant. (1938). Sequoya. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. Cited by9
    • Bender, Margaret. (2008). Indexicality, voice, and context in the distribution of Cherokee scripts [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.037
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1992b). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 83–110). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Scancarelli, Janine. (1992). Aspiration and Cherokee orthographies. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 135–152). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Scancarelli, Janine. (1996). Cherokee writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 587–592). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Smalley, William A. (1994b). Native creation of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 708–720). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Fornés, Alicia, & Sánchez, Gemma. (2014). Analysis and recognition of music scores. In David Doermann & Karl Tombre (Eds.), Handbook of document image processing and recognition (pp. 749–774). London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-859-1_24
  • Forster, Iris. (2014). [Book review: Theresa Lillis, (2013), The sociolinguistics of writing]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 168–170. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.09for
  • Forster, Iris, Borgwald, Susanne R., & Neef, Martin. (2012). Form follows function: Interjections and onomatopoetica in comics [Special issue: The writing system at play, edited by Vivian Cook, Benedetta Bassetti, & Jyotsna Vaid]. Writing Systems Research, 4, 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.751348 Cited by5
    • Appelt, Annalen, Balestra, Miriam, & Neef, Martin. (2015). Orthographic constraints on the spelling of German a-sounds. Written Language & Literacy, 18(1), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.07app
    • Cook, Vivian, Bassetti, Benedetta, & Vaid, Jyotsna. (2012). The writing system at play [Special issue: The writing system at play, edited by Vivian Cook, Benedetta Bassetti, & Jyotsna Vaid]. Writing Systems Research, 4(2), 120–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.740432
    • Neef, Martin. (2012b). Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems. Writing Systems Research, 4(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.706658
    • Neef, Martin. (2015). Writing systems as modular objects: Proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics, 1, 708–721. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2015-0026
    • Wong, Andrew D. (2013). Brand names and unconventional spelling: A two-pronged analysis of the orthographic construction of brand identity. Written Language & Literacy, 16(2), 115–145. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.2.01won
  • Forster, K. I. (1970). Visual perception of rapidly-presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 215–221. Cited by6
    • Andrews, Sally. (2006b). All about words: A lexicalist perspective on reading. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 318–347). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Berninger, Virginia, Abbott, Robert D., & Alsdorf, Barbara J. (1997). Lexical- and sentence-level processes in comprehension of written sentences. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 135–162.
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2012). A parallel activation model with a sequential twist. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 52–69). London: Psychology Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Schotter, Elizabeth R., Masson, Michael E. J., Potter, Mary C., & Treiman, Rebecca. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. doi10.1177/1529100615623267
    • Smith, Frank. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [1978, second edition; 1982, third edition; 1988, fourth edition; 1994, fifth edition; 2004, sixth edition, Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
  • Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257–287). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Cited by30
    • Balota, David A., & Yap, Melvin J. (2006). Attentional control and the flexible lexical processor: Explorations of the magic moment of word recognition. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 229–258). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Baroni, Antonio. (2013). Eye dialect and casual speech spelling: Orthographic variation in OT. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 24–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.808155
    • Davis, Chris, & Kim, Jeesun. (2006). Changing circumstance: How flexible is lexical access? In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 207–228). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, Colin J. (2012). The orthographic similarity of printed words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 185–206). London: Psychology Press.
    • Forster, Kenneth. (1992). Memory-addressing mechanisms and lexical access. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 413–434). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2006). Five challenges for activation models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 95–121). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2012). A parallel activation model with a sequential twist. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 52–69). London: Psychology Press.
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Grainger, Jonathan. (1992). Orthographic neighborhoods and visual word recognition. In Ram Frost and Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 131–146). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2002a). Constituent-morpheme priming: Implications from the morphology of two-kanji compound words. Japanese Psychological Research, 44, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5884.00009
    • Joyce, Terry. (2004). Modeling the Japanese mental lexicon: Morphological, orthographic and phonological considerations. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in Psychological Research: Volume 31 (pp. 27–61). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
    • Joyce, Terry, & Masuda, Hisashi. (2018). Introduction to the multi-script Japanese writing system and word processing. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 179–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Keenan, Janice M., & Betjemann, Rebecca S. (2008a). Comprehension of single words: The role of semantics in word identification and reading disability. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 191–210). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Knuijt, Paul P. N. A., & Assink, Egbert M. H. (1997). Morphographic units in Dutch polysyllabic words: In search of the body of the BOSS. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_1
    • Masuda, Hisashi, & Joyce, Terry. (2018). Constituent-priming investigations of the morphological activation of Japanese compound words. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 221–244). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Nagler, Telse, Lindberg, Sven, & Hasselhorn, Marcus. (2016). A fact retrieval account of the acceleration phenomenon. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 107–123). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_7
    • Pexman, Penny M. (2012). Meaning-based influences on visual word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 24–43). London: Psychology Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Seidenberg, Mark S., & McClelland, James L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (1981a). Attentional and automatic context effects in reading. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 241–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Taft, Marcus. (2015). The nature of lexical representation in visual word recognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 99–113). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Williams, Clay, & Bever, Thomas. (2010). Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias? Reading and Writing, 23(5), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9228-0
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Balota, David A. (2015). Visual word recognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 26–43). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2016). Processing the written word. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 453–469). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Forster, K. I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W. E. Cooper & E. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psychological studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 27–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by8
    • Andrews, Sally, & Bond, Rachel. (2009). Lexical expertise and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down processing of lexical ambiguity [Special issue: Lexical representations in reading and writing, edited by Joanne Arciuli]. Reading and Writing, 22(6), 687–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9137-7
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Perdijk, Kors, Schreuder, Robert, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2005). The role of morphological family size in word recognition: A developmental perspective [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 121–135.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Van Orden, Guy C., Stone, Gregory O., Garlington, Karen L., Markson, Lori R., Pinnt, Greta Sue, Simonfy, Cynthia M., & Brichetto, Tony. (1992). “Assembled” phonology and reading: A case study in how theoretical perspective shapes empirical investigation. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 249–292). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Zhang, Biyin, & Peng, Danling. (1992). Decomposed storage in the Chinese lexicon. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 131–149). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
  • Forster, K. I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical context on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 465–495. Cited by6
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Colombo, Lucia, & Tabossi, Patrizia. (1992). Strategies and stress assignment: Evidence from a shallow orthography. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 319–340). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Li, Ping, & Yip, Michael C. (1998). Context effects and the processing of spoken homophones [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 223–243. [Also pulished in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 69–89). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Seidenberg, Mark S., & McClelland, James L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Forster, K. I. (1987). Form-priming with masked primes: The best match hypothesis. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), The psychology of reading: Attention and performance XII (pp. 127–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by6
    • Beauvillain, Cecile, & Segui, Juan. (1992). Representation and processing of morphological information. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 377–388). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Carello, Claudia, & Turvey, M. T., Lukatela, Georgije. (1992). Can theories of word recognition remain stubbornly nonphonological? In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 211–226). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2006). Morpho-Phonemic similarity within and between languages: A factor to be considered in processing Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9009-y
    • Peng, Dan-ling, Li, Yan-ping, & Yang, Hui 1997). Orthographic processing in the Identification of Chinese characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 85–108). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Schiff, Rachel, Raveh, Michal, & Kahta, Shani. (2008). The developing mental lexicon: Evidence from morphological priming of irregular Hebrew forms. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9088-4
    • Van Heuven, Walter J. B. (2005). Bilingual interactive activation models of word recognition in a second language. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (260–288). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
  • Forster, K. I. (1989). Basic issues in lexical processing. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and processing (pp. 75–107). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cited by10
    • Andrews, Sally. (2006b). All about words: A lexicalist perspective on reading. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 318–347). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Andrews, Sally. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Davis, Chris, & Kim, Jeesun. (2006). Changing circumstance: How flexible is lexical access? In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 207–228). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, Colin J. (2012). The orthographic similarity of printed words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 185–206). London: Psychology Press.
    • Forster, Kenneth. (1992). Memory-addressing mechanisms and lexical access. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 413–434). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2006). Five challenges for activation models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 95–121). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2004). Modeling the Japanese mental lexicon: Morphological, orthographic and phonological considerations. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in Psychological Research: Volume 31 (pp. 27–61). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
    • Öney, Banu, Peter, Mira, & Katz, Leonard. (1997). Phonological processing in printed word recognition: Effects of age and writing system. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0101_4
    • Perdijk, Kors, Schreuder, Robert, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2005). The role of morphological family size in word recognition: A developmental perspective [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 121–135.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Forster, Kenneth. (1992). Memory-addressing mechanisms and lexical access. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 413–434). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. Cited by1
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
  • Forster, K. I. (1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 203–233. Cited by7
    • Álvarez, Carlos J., Carreiras, Manuel, & Perea, Manuel. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000242 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 98–123). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Davis, Chris, & Kim, Jeesun. (2006). Changing circumstance: How flexible is lexical access? In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 207–228). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
    • Goikietxea, Edurne. (2005). Levels of phonological awareness in preliterate and literate Spanish-speaking children. Reading and Writing, 18(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-1955-7
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Balota, David A. (2015). Visual word recognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 26–43). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2016). Processing the written word. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 453–469). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Forster, K. I. (1999). The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access. Brain and Language, 68, 5–15. Cited by6
    • Boudelaa, Sami. (2014). Is the Arabic mental lexicon morpheme-based or stem-based? Implications for spoken and written word recognition. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 31–54). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Basnight-Brown, Dana M. (2008). The role of morphology in visual word recognition: Graded semantic influences due to competing senses and semantic richness of the stem. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 85–106). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2006). Five challenges for activation models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 95–121). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2012). A parallel activation model with a sequential twist. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 52–69). London: Psychology Press.
    • Hudson, Roxanne F., Lane, Holly B., & Mercer, Cecil D. (2005). Writing prompts: The role of various priming conditions on the compositional fluency of developing writers. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-7042-2
    • Schiff, Rachel, Raveh, Michal, & Kahta, Shani. (2008). The developing mental lexicon: Evidence from morphological priming of irregular Hebrew forms. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9088-4
  • Forster, K. I. (2000). The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1109–1115. Cited by5
    • Adelman, James S. (2012b). Methodological issues with words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 116–138). London: Psychology Press.
    • Balota, David A., & Yap, Melvin J. (2006). Attentional control and the flexible lexical processor: Explorations of the magic moment of word recognition. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 229–258). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., Hutchinson, Keith A., & Cortese, Michael J. (2012). Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 90–115). London: Psychology Press.
    • Macizo, Pedro, & Van Petten, Cyma. (2007). Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 295–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9032-z
    • Perea, Manuel. (2015). Neighborhoods effects in visual word recognition and reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 76–87). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Forster, Kenneth I. (2006). Five challenges for activation models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 95–121). Hove; New York: Psychology Press. Cited by1
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Forster, Kenneth I. (2012). A parallel activation model with a sequential twist. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 52–69). London: Psychology Press. Cited by1
    • Taft, Marcus. (2015). The nature of lexical representation in visual word recognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 99–113). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Forster, K. I., & Bednall, E. S. (1976). Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access. Memory & Cognition, 4, 53–61. Cited by3
    • Bouwhuis, Don G. (1979). Word knowledge and letter recognition as determinants of word recognition. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 269–281). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Hino, Yasushi, Lupker, Stephen J., Sears, Chris R., & Ogawa, Taeko. (1998). The effects of polysemy for Japanese katakana words [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 395–424. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 241–270). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
  • Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–635. Cited by32
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, & Siegel, Linda S. (2003). Reading skills in three orthographies: The case of trilingual Arabic-Hebrew-English-speaking Arab children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(7), 611–634.
    • Allport, D. Alan. (1979). Word recognition in reading (tutorial paper). In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 227–257). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Ashby, Jane, & Rayner, Keith. (2004). Representing syllable information during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 391–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000233 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 65–97). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Bouwhuis, Don G. (1979). Word knowledge and letter recognition as determinants of word recognition. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 269–281). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Buchanan, Lori, & Besner, Derek. (1993). Reading aloud: Evidence for the use of whole word nonsemantic pathway. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 133–152. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 5–24). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Colombo, Lucia, & Tabossi, Patrizia. (1992). Strategies and stress assignment: Evidence from a shallow orthography. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 319–340). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Coltheart, Max. (2012). Dual-route theories of reading aloud. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–27). London: Psychology Press.
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Basnight-Brown, Dana M. (2008). The role of morphology in visual word recognition: Graded semantic influences due to competing senses and semantic richness of the stem. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 85–106). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Forster, Kenneth. (1992). Memory-addressing mechanisms and lexical access. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 413–434). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Glushko, Robert J. (1981). Principles for pronouncing print: The psychology of phonography. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 61–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Hino, Yasushi, Lupker, Stephen J., Sears, Chris R., & Ogawa, Taeko. (1998). The effects of polysemy for Japanese katakana words [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 395–424. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 241–270). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Hoosain, Rumjahn. (2002). Speed of getting at the phonology and meaning of Chinese words. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 130-142). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Hue, Chih-Wei. (1992). Recognition processes in character naming. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 93–107). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Katz, Leonard, & Feldman, Laurie B. (1981). Linguistic coding in word recognition: Comparisons between a deep and a shallow orthography. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 85–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Lervåg, Arne, & Bråten, Ivar. (2002). Effects of memory load on word recognition: Are there dual-routers in Norway? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 233–259.
    • Liu, In-Mao. (1995). Script factors that affect literacy: Alphabetic vs. logographic languages. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 145–162). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Massaro, Dominic W., & Jesse, Alexandra. (2005). The magic of reading: Too many influences for quick and easy explanations. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 37–61). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Perdijk, Kors, Schreuder, Robert, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2005). The role of morphological family size in word recognition: A developmental perspective [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 121–135.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen, & Coltheart, Max. (2006). Is there serial processing in the reading system; and are there local representations? In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 3–24). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Schotter, Elizabeth R., Masson, Michael E. J., Potter, Mary C., & Treiman, Rebecca. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. doi10.1177/1529100615623267
    • Schiff, Rachel. (2003). The effects of morphology and word length on the reading of Hebrew nominals. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 263–287.
    • Seidenberg, Mark S., & McClelland, James L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Sibley, Daragh E., & Kello, Christopher T. (2012). Learned orthographic representations facilitates large-scale modeling of word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 28–51). London: Psychology Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Van Orden, Guy C., Stone, Gregory O., Garlington, Karen L., Markson, Lori R., Pinnt, Greta Sue, Simonfy, Cynthia M., & Brichetto, Tony. (1992). “Assembled” phonology and reading: A case study in how theoretical perspective shapes empirical investigation. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 249–292). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Weekes, Brendan S. (2010). Lexical retrieval in alphabetic and non-alphabetic scripts: Evidence from brain imaging. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 273–289). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Woollams, Anna M. (2015). What does acquired dyslexia tell us about reading in the mind and brain? In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 149–164). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.680 Cited by30
    • Álvarez, Carlos J., Carreiras, Manuel, & Perea, Manuel. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000242 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 98–123). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Andrews, Sally. (2006a). Preface. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. xix–xxix). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Andrews, Sally. (2012). Individual differences in skilled visual word recognition and reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 151–172). London: Psychology Press.
    • Andrews, Sally. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Beauvillain, Cecile, & Segui, Juan. (1992). Representation and processing of morphological information. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 377–388). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Carreiras, Manuel, Armstrong, Blair C., Perea, Manuel, & Frost, Ram. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005
    • Davis, Chris, & Kim, Jeesun. (2006). Changing circumstance: How flexible is lexical access? In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 207–228). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Basnight-Brown, Dana M. (2008). The role of morphology in visual word recognition: Graded semantic influences due to competing senses and semantic richness of the stem. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 85–106). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Katherine. (2012). Morphological processing: A comparison of graded and categorical accounts. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–22). London: Psychology Press.
    • Forster, Kenneth. (1992). Memory-addressing mechanisms and lexical access. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 413–434). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2006). Five challenges for activation models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 95–121). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2012). A parallel activation model with a sequential twist. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 52–69). London: Psychology Press.
    • Gijsel, Martine A. R., van Bon, Wim H. J., & Bosman, Anna M. T. (2004). Assessing reading skills by means of paper-and-pencil lexical decision: Issues of reliability, repetition, and word-pseudoword ratio. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(5), 517–536.
    • Goikietxea, Edurne. (2005). Levels of phonological awareness in preliterate and literate Spanish-speaking children. Reading and Writing, 18(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-1955-7
    • Hong, Ee-Li, & Yelland, Gregory W. (1997). The generality of lexical neighbourhood effects. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 187–203). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2006). Morpho-Phonemic similarity within and between languages: A factor to be considered in processing Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9009-y
    • Jeong, Junghye, Katz, Leonard, & Lee, Yang. (2018). The two-dimensional orthography of phonology and morphology in differentiating Korean and Chinese. Writing Systems Research, 10(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2018.1519482
    • Kinoshita, Sachiko. (2015). Visual word recognition in the Bayesian reader framework. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 63–75). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Ko, In Yeong, & Wang, Min. (2015). Reading compound words by adult Korean-English bilinguals [Special issue: Reading morphologically complex words in a second language, edited by Min Wang & Ludo Verhoeven]. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.981495
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Ko, In Yeong. (2018). The time course of activation of semantic and orthographic information in morphological decomposition by Korean adults and developing readers. Frontiers in Communication, 3:51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00051
    • Perea, Manuel. (2015). Neighborhoods effects in visual word recognition and reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 76–87). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Pollatsek, Alexander. (2015). The role of sound in silent reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 185–201). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2019). EPS mid-career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819829696
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Schiff, Rachel, Raveh, Michal, & Kahta, Shani. (2008). The developing mental lexicon: Evidence from morphological priming of irregular Hebrew forms. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9088-4
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Taft, Marcus, & Zhu, Xiaoping. (1997b). Using masked priming to examine lexical storage of Chinese compound words. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 233–241). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Weekes, Brendan, Chen, May Jane, & Yu, Bo-lin. (1997). Repetition priming effects of Chinese characters and pseudocharacters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 171–186). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  • Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1991). The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90008-8 Cited by7
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen, & Coltheart, Max. (2006). Is there serial processing in the reading system; and are there local representations? In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 3–24). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Taft, Marcus, & Zhu, Xiaoping. (1997b). Using masked priming to examine lexical storage of Chinese compound words. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 233–241). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • van Gorp, Karly, Segers, Eliane, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2016). Masked onset priming in lexical decision: Differential effects in adults and beginning readers. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.04van
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1999b). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837.
  • Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211–251. Cited by23
    • Andrews, Sally. (2012). Individual differences in skilled visual word recognition and reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 151–172). London: Psychology Press.
    • Andrews, Sally. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Andrews, Sally, & Bond, Rachel. (2009). Lexical expertise and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down processing of lexical ambiguity [Special issue: Lexical representations in reading and writing, edited by Joanne Arciuli]. Reading and Writing, 22(6), 687–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9137-7
    • Beauvillain, Cecile, & Segui, Juan. (1992). Representation and processing of morphological information. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 377–388). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Burani, Cristina., & Laudanna, Alessandro. (1992). Units of representation for derived words in the lexicon. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 361–376). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Davis, Colin J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
    • Feldman, Laurie B., & Andjelković, Darinka. (1992). Morphological analysis in word recognition. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Phonology, orthography, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 343–360). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2012). A parallel activation model with a sequential twist. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 52–69). London: Psychology Press.
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Grainger, Jonathan. (1992). Orthographic neighborhoods and visual word recognition. In Ram Frost and Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 131–146). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Hong, Ee-Li, & Yelland, Gregory W. (1997). The generality of lexical neighbourhood effects. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 187–203). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Kinoshita, Sachiko. (2015). Visual word recognition in the Bayesian reader framework. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 63–75). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Peng, Dan-ling, Li, Yan-ping, & Yang, Hui 1997). Orthographic processing in the Identification of Chinese characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 85–108). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Perea, Manuel. (2015). Neighborhoods effects in visual word recognition and reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 76–87). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Schiff, Rachel, Raveh, Michal, & Kahta, Shani. (2008). The developing mental lexicon: Evidence from morphological priming of irregular Hebrew forms. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9088-4
    • Schoonbaert, Sofie, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000198 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 12–42). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Taft, Marcus, & Zhu, Xiaoping. (1997b). Using masked priming to examine lexical storage of Chinese compound words. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 233–241). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo, & Hatsuzuka, Makiko. (1998). The effects of morphological semantics on the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 293–322. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 139–168). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Weekes, B. S., Chen, M. J., & Lin, Y-B. (1998). Differential effects of phonological priming on Chinese character recognition [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 201–222. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 47–68). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2016). Processing the written word. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 453–469). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503 Cited by13
    • Andrews, Sally, & Bond, Rachel. (2009). Lexical expertise and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down processing of lexical ambiguity [Special issue: Lexical representations in reading and writing, edited by Joanne Arciuli]. Reading and Writing, 22(6), 687–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9137-7
    • Beyersmann, Elisabeth, Kezilas, Yvette, Coltheart, Max, Castles, Anne, Ziegler, Johannes C., Taft, Marcus, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2018). Taking the book from the bookshelf: Masked constituent priming effects from compound words and nonwords. Journal of Cognition, 1(1): 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.11
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Chetail, Fabienne, & Mathey, Stéphanie. (2009). The syllable frequency effect in visual recognition of French words: A study in skilled and beginning readers. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 955–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9135-9
    • Holmes, V. M. (2012). Adult word recognition and visual sequential memory. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9245-z
    • Holmes, Virginia M., & Malone, N. (2004). Adult spelling strategies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 537–566.
    • Kim, Jeesun, & Davis, Chris. (2004). Characteristics of poor readers of Korean hangul: Auditory, visual and phonological processing [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 153–185. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000013804.76677.a9
    • Niolaki, Georgia Z., Terzopoulos, Aris R., & Masterson, Jackie. (2014). Varieties of developmental dyslexia in Greek children. Writing Systems Research, 6(2), 230–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.893862
    • Pae, Hye K., Kim, Sun-A, & Luo, Xiao (Peter). (2018). Constituent processing or gestalt processing?: How native Korean speakers read mutilated words in English. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 427–446). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Schiff, Rachel, Raveh, Michal, & Kahta, Shani. (2008). The developing mental lexicon: Evidence from morphological priming of irregular Hebrew forms. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9088-4
    • Schoonbaert, Sofie, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000198 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 12–42). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Taft, Marcus, Xu, Joe, & Li, Sonny. (2017). Letter coding in visual word recognition: The impact of embedded words. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.05.002
    • Williams, Clay, & Bever, Thomas. (2010). Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias? Reading and Writing, 23(5), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9228-0
  • Forster, K. I., & Hector, J. (2002). Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: The turple effect. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1106–1117. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194328 Cited by7
    • Davis, Colin J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, Colin J. (2012). The orthographic similarity of printed words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 185–206). London: Psychology Press.
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, Tong, Xiuli, & Mimeau, Catherine. (2019). Morphological and semantic processing in developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 327–349). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.015
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2006). Five challenges for activation models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 95–121). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Keenan, Janice M., & Betjemann, Rebecca S. (2008a). Comprehension of single words: The role of semantics in word identification and reading disability. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 191–210). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Forster, K. I., Mohan, K., & Hector, J. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In S. Kinoshita, & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 345–360). New York: Psychology Press. Cited by7
    • Álvarez, Carlos J., Carreiras, Manuel, & Perea, Manuel. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000242 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 98–123). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, Milin, Petar, Cho, Kit W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, & O'Connor, Patrick A. (2015). Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00111
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Schiff, Rachel, Raveh, Michal, & Kahta, Shani. (2008). The developing mental lexicon: Evidence from morphological priming of irregular Hebrew forms. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9088-4
    • Smolka, Eva, Preller, Katrin H., & Eulitz, Carsten. (2014). ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 696–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.696 Cited by11
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Davis, Colin J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
    • Davis, Colin J. (2012). The orthographic similarity of printed words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 185–206). London: Psychology Press.
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, Milin, Petar, Cho, Kit W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, & O'Connor, Patrick A. (2015). Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00111
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2006). Five challenges for activation models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 95–121). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Khateb, Asaid, Taha, Haitham Y., Elias, Inas, & Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2013). The effect of the internal orthographic connectivity of written Arabic words on the process of the visual recognition: A comparison between skilled and dyslexic readers [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.834244
    • Macizo, Pedro, & Van Petten, Cyma. (2007). Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 295–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9032-z
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Forster, K. I., & Taft, M. (1994). Bodies, antibodies, and neighborhood density effects in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 844–863. Cited by10
    • Álvarez, Carlos J., Carreiras, Manuel, & Perea, Manuel. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000242 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 98–123). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Andrews, Sally. (2012). Individual differences in skilled visual word recognition and reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 151–172). London: Psychology Press.
    • Andrews, Sally. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2006). Five challenges for activation models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 95–121). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Forster, Kenneth I. (2012). A parallel activation model with a sequential twist. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 52–69). London: Psychology Press.
    • Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2006). Morpho-Phonemic similarity within and between languages: A factor to be considered in processing Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9009-y
    • Schiff, Rachel, Raveh, Michal, & Kahta, Shani. (2008). The developing mental lexicon: Evidence from morphological priming of irregular Hebrew forms. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9088-4
    • Taft, Marcus, Xu, Joe, & Li, Sonny. (2017). Letter coding in visual word recognition: The impact of embedded words. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.05.002
    • Taft, Marcus, & Zhu, Xiaoping. (1997b). Using masked priming to examine lexical storage of Chinese compound words. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 233–241). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo, & Hatsuzuka, Makiko. (1998). The effects of morphological semantics on the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 293–322. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 139–168). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
  • Foss, D. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1973). On the psychological reality of the phoneme: Perception, identification and consciousness. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 246–257. Cited by5
    • Baroni, Antonio. (2011). Alphabetic vs. non-alphabetic writing: Linguistic fit and natural tendencies. Rivista di Linguistica [Italian Journal of Linguistics], 23(2), 127–159.
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Gibson, Eleanor J., & Levin, Harry. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Massaro, Dominic W. (1979b). Reading and listening (tutorial paper). In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 331–354). New York; London: Plenum Press.
  • Fossey, Charles. (1927). Notices sur les caractères éstrangers anciens et modernes, rédigées par un groups de savants. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale. [1948, Second edition] Cited by5
    • Diringer, David. (1948). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind. London: Hutchinson; New York: Philosophical Library. [1953, Second revised edition; 1968, Third revised edition (2 volumes), London: Hutchinson; New York: Funk & Wagnalls; 1996, Reprinted, Munshiram Maniharlal Publishers]
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Nakanishi, Akira. (1980). Writing systems of the word: Alphabets, syllabaries, pictograms (Revised translation). Boston; Vermont; Tokyo: Tuttle Publishing. [1975, Sekai no moji. Kyoto: Shōkadō; 1998, Revised edition, Tuttle Publishing]
    • Pierson, Morgane. (2021). Beyond the semantic. Typographic representation of ancient nonetary inscriptions. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 455–488). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-pier
  • Fossey, Charles. (1948). Notices sur les caractères éstrangers anciens et modernes, rédigées par un groups de savants (Second edition). Paris: Imprimerie Nationale. [1927, First edition] Cited by3
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
  • Foster, Jeremy J. (1979). The use of visual cues in text. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 189–203). New York; London: Plenum Press. Cited by3
    • Dyson, Mary C., & Gregory, Judy. (2002). Typographic cueing on screen. Visible Language, 36(3), 326–346.
    • Pugh, A. K. (1979). Styles and strategies in silent reading. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 431–443). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Twyman, Michael. (1979). A schema for the study of graphic language (tutorial paper). In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 117–150). New York; London: Plenum Press.
  • Foulin, Jean Noel. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2 Cited by13
    • Arciuli, Joanne, & Simpson, Ian C. (2011). Not all letters are created equal: Exploring letter name knowledge through spelling in school children and adults. Writing Systems Research, 3(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr001
    • Both-de Vries, Anna C., & Bus, Adriana G. (2010b). The proper name as starting point for basic reading skills. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9158-2
    • Both-de Vries, Anna C., & Bus, Adriana G. (2010a). It's all in the name. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 3–15). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_1
    • Byrne, Brian, Samuelsson, Stefan, Wadsworth, Sally, Hulslander, Jacqueline, Corley, Robin, DeFries, John C., Quain, Peter, Willcutt, Erik G., & Olson, Richard K. (2007). Longitudinal twin study of early literacy development: Preschool through Grade 1 [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9019-9
    • Elimelech, Adi, Aram, Dorit, & Levin, Iris. (2020). Mothers teaching their children the Hebrew writing system: The effects on children’s early writing and reading skills. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 263–287). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_17
    • Fricke, Silke, Szczerbinski, Marcin, Stackhouse, Joy, & Fox-Boyer, Annette V. (2008). Predicting individual differences in early literacy acquisition in German: The role of speech and language processing skills and letter knowledge [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 103–146. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.02fri
    • Georgiou, George K, Torppa, Minna, Manolitsis, George, Lyytinen, Heikki, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of reading and spelling across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9271-x
    • Kim, Young-Suk. (2009b). The foundation of literacy skills in Korean: The relationship between letter-name knowledge and phonological awareness and their relative contribution to literacy skills. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 907–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9131-0
    • Kim, Young-Suk. (2009c). The relationship between home literacy practices and developmental trajectories of emergent literacy and conventional literacy skills for Korean children. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9103-9
    • Levin, Iris. (2010). The role of Hebrew letter names in early literacy: The case of multi-phonemic acrophonic names. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 55–81). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_5
    • Manolitsis, George, & Tafa, Eufimia. (2011). Letter-name letter-sound and phonological awareness: Evidence from Greek-speaking kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 24(1), 27–53. doi10.1007/s11145-009-9200-z
    • Piasta, Shayne B., Purpura, David J., & Wagner, Richard K. (2010). Fostering alphabet knowledge development: A comparison of two instructional approaches. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 607–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9174-x
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
  • Fowler, A. E. (1988). Grammaticality judgments and reading skill in grade 2. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 73–94. Cited by5
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, Share, David, & Mansour, Maysaloon Said. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(5), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024237415143
    • Feldman, Laurie B., & Andjelković, Darinka. (1992). Morphological analysis in word recognition. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Phonology, orthography, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 343–360). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Leikin, Mark, & Assayag-Bouskila, Orit. (2004). Expression of syntactic complexity in sentence comprehension: A comparison between dyslexic and regular readers [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 801–821.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Fowler, A. E. (1991). How early phonological development might set the stage for phoneme awareness. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Liberman (pp. 97–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by42
    • Anthony, Jason L., Williams, Jeffrey M., Aghara, Rachel G., Dunkelberger, Martha, Novak, Barbara, & Mukherjee, Anuja Divatia. (2010). Assessment of individual differences in phonological representation. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 969–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9185-7
    • Burgess, Stephen R. (2002). The influence of speech perception, oral language ability, the home literacy environment, and pre-reading knowledge on the growth of phonological sensitivity: A one-year longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 709–737.
    • Chiappe, Penny, Stringer, Ron, Siegel, Linda S., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2002). Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 73–107.
    • Duncan, Lynne G. (2010). Phonological development from a cross-linguistic perspective. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 43–68). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Foulin, Jean Noel. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2
    • Foy, Judith G., & Mann, Virginia A. (2012). Speech production deficits in early readers: Predictors of risk. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 799–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9300-4
    • Gilliver, Megan Louise, & Byrne, Brian. (2009). What's in a name? Preschoolers' noun learning performance in relation to their risk for reading disability [Special issue: Lexical representations in reading and writing, edited by Joanne Arciuli]. Reading and Writing, 22(6), 637–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9155-5
    • Gottardo, Alexandra, Chiappe, Penny, Siegel, Linda S., & Stanovich, Keith E. (1999). Patterns of word and nonword processing in skilled and less-skilled readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 465–487.
    • Hu, Chieh-Fang. (2008). Use orthography in L2 auditory word learning: Who benefits? Reading and Writing, 21(8), 823–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9094-6
    • Jiménez, Juan E., García, Eduardo, Naranjo, Francisco, de León, Sara C., & Hernández-Cabrera, Juan A. (2020). An analysis and comparison of three theoretical models of the reading-writing relationships in Spanish-speaking children. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 35–53). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_3
    • Karemaker, Arjette M., Pitchford, Nicola J., & O'Malley, Claire. (2010). Does whole-word multimedia software support literacy acquisition? Reading and Writing, 23(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9148-4
    • Laing, Emma. (2002). Investigating reading development in atypical populations: The case of Williams syndrome [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 575–587.
    • Lewis, Barbara A., Freebairn, Lisa A., & Taylor, H. Gerry. (2002). Correlates of spelling abilities in children with early speech sound disorders. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 389–407.
    • Mann, Virginia, & Wimmer, Heinz. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 653–682.
    • McBride-Chang, C., Cheung, H., Chow, B. W.-Y., Chow, C. S.-L., & Choi, L. (2006). Metalinguistic skills and vocabulary knowledge in Chinese (L1) and English (L2) [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 695–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5742-x
    • Messbauer, Vera C. S., & de Jong, Peter F. (2006). Effects of visual and phonological distinctness on visual-verbal paired associate learning in Dutch dyslexic and normal readers. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 393–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5121-7
    • Miller, D. Gary. (1994). Ancient scripts and phonological knowledge (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Mody, Maria. (2003). Phonological basis in reading disability: A review and analysis of the evidence [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 21–39.
    • Monaghan, Josephine, & Ellis, Andrew W. (2002a). Age of acquisition and the completeness of phonological representations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 759–788.
    • Morais, José. (2003). Levels of phonological representation in skilled reading and in learning to read [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 123–151.
    • Morfidi, Eleni, van der Leij, Aryan, de Jong, Peter F., Scheltinga, Femke, & Bekebrede, Judith. (2007). Reading in two orthographies: A cross-linguistic study of Dutch average and poor readers who learn English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 753–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9035-9
    • Nergård-Nilssen, T. (2006). Word-decoding deficits in Norwegian: The impact of psycholinguistic marker effects. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5468-9
    • Pennington, Bruce F., Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, Green, Phyllis A., & Lefly, Dianne L. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 707–755.
    • Pennington, Bruce F., & Peterson, Robin L. (2015). Development of dyslexia. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 361–376). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Post, Yolanda V., & Carreker, Suzanne. (2002). Orthographic similarity and phonological transparency in spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 317–340.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Raynolds, Laura B., & Uhry, Joanna K. (2010). The invented spellings of non-Spanish phonemes by Spanish–English bilingual and English monolingual kindergarteners. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9169-7
    • Russak, Susie, amp; Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2011). Phonological awareness in Hebrew (L1) and English (L2) in normal and disabled readers [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9235-1
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3180-4
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Fowler, Anne E. (2004). Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(5), 483–515. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044598.81628.e6
    • Shanya, Michal, Geva, Esther, & Melech-Feder, Liat. (2010). Emergent literacy in children of immigrants coming from a primarily oral literacy culture. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 24–60. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.02sha
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Smith, Susan Lambrecht. (2009). Early phonological and lexical markers of reading disabilities. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9101-y
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Stringer, Ronald W., Toplak, Maggie E., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2004). Differential relationships between RAN performance, behaviour ratings, and executive function measures: Searching for a double dissociation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 891–914.
    • Treiman, Rebecca. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Geva, Esther. (2000). Processing novel phonemic contrasts in the acquisition of L2 word reading [Special issue: The development of second language reading in primary children–Research issues and trends, edited by Esther Geva & Ludo Verhoeven]. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0404_3
    • Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Siegel, Linda S. (1997). The spelling performance of ESL and native speakers of English as a function of reading skill [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 387–406.
    • Walley, Amanda C., Metsala, Jamie L., & Garlock, Victoria M. (2003). Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021789804977
    • Wang, Min, & Geva, Esther. (2003a). Spelling acquisition of novel English phonemes in Chinese children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 325–348.
    • Wesseling, Ralph, & Reitsma, Pieter. (2000). The transient role of explicit phonological recoding for reading acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 313–336.
  • Fowler, A. E., Doherty, B. J., & Boynton, L. (1995). The basis of reading skill in young adults with Down syndrome. In L. Nadel & D. Rosenthal (Eds.), Down syndrome: Living and learning in the community (pp. 182–196). New York: Wiley-Liss. Cited by6
    • Boudreau, Donna. (2002). Literacy skills in children and adolescents with Down syndrome [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 497–525.
    • Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, Peterson, Robin, Olson, Richard, & Pennington, Bruce. (2009). Component reading skills in Down Syndrome. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9114-6
    • Goetz, Kristina, Hulme, Charles, Brigstocke, Sophie, Carroll, Julia M., Nasir, Louise, & Snowling, M. (2008). Training reading and phoneme awareness skills in children with Down syndrome [Special issue: Recent developments in reading intervention research, edited by William E. Tunmer]. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9089-3
    • Laws, Glynis, & Gunn, Deborah. (2002). Relationships between reading, phonological skills and language development in individuals with Down syndrome: A five year follow-up study [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 527–548.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., Hulme, Charles, & Mercer, Robin C. (2002). A deficit in rime awareness in children with Down syndrome [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 471–495.
  • Fowler, A. E., & Liberman, I. Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by33
    • Bryant, Peter, Nunes, Terezinha, & Aidinis, Athanasios. (1999). Different morphemes, same spelling problems: cross-linguistic developmental studies. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Ed.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 112–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Bryant, Peter, Nunes, Terezinha, & Bindman, Miriam. (2000). The relations between children's linguistic awareness and spelling: The case of the apostrophe [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008152501105
    • Carlisle, Joanne F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008131926604
    • Carlisle, Joanne F., & Katz, Lauren A. (2006). Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 669–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5766-2
    • Carlisle, Joanne F., & Kearns, Devin M. (2017). Learning to read morphologically complex words. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 191–214). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Casalis, Séverine, & Louis-Alexandre, Marie-France. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 303–335. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008177205648
    • Chen, Xi, Hao, Meiling, Geva, Esther, Zhu, Jin, & Shu, Hua. (2009). The role of compound awareness in Chinese children's vocabulary acquisition and character reading. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9127-9
    • Chik, Pakey Pui-man, Ho, Connie Suk-han, Yeung, Pui-sze, Chan, David Wai-ock, Chung, Kevin Kien-hoa, Luan, Hui, Lo, Lap-yan, & Lau, Wendy Suet-yee. (2012). Syntactic skills in sentence reading comprehension among Chinese elementary school children. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 679–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9293-4
    • Egan, Joanne, & Pring, Linda. (2004). The processing of inflectional morphology: A comparison of children with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 567–591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044433.30864.23
    • Garcia, Noelia P., Abbott, Robert D., & Berninger, Virginia W. (2010). Predicting poor, average, and superior spellers in grades 1 to 6 from phonological, orthographic, and morphological, spelling, or reading composites. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 61–98. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.03gar
    • Geva, Esther, & Shafman, Dana. (2010). Rudiments of inflectional morphology skills in emergent English–Hebrew biliterates. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 191–204). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_14
    • Jarmulowicz, Linda, Hay, Sarah E., Taran, Valentina L., & Ethington, Corinna A. (2008). Fitting derivational morphophonology into a developmental model of reading. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9073-y
    • Kemp, Nenagh. (2006). Children's spelling of base, inflected, and derived words: Links with morphological awareness [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 737–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9001-6
    • Koda, Keiko. (2005). Learning to read across writing systems: Transfer, metalinguistic awareness, and second-language reading development. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (311–334). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Koda, Keiko. (2009). Learning to read in new writing systems. In Michael H. Long & Catherine J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching. Blackwell Publishing.
    • Koda, Keiko, & Miller, Ryan T. (2018). Cross-linguistic interactions in L2 word meaning inference in English as a foreign language. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 293–312). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Kruk, Richard S., & Bergman, Krista. (2013). The reciprocal relations between morphological processes and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 10–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.014
    • Ku, Yu-Min, & Anderson, Richard C. (2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(5), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024227231216
    • Leong, Che Kan. (2000b). Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words and grades 4, 5 and 6 children's spelling [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 277–302.
    • Lyster, Solveig-Alma Halaas. (2002). The effects of morphological versus phonological awareness training in kindergarten on reading development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 261–294. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015272516220
    • Mann, Virginia A. (2000). Introduction to special issue on morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 143–147.
    • Müller, Kurt, & Brady, Susan. (2001). Correlates of early reading performance in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 757–799.
    • Nunes, Terezinha, Bryant, Peter, & Bindman, Miriam. (1997a). Learning to spell regular and irregular verbs [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007951213624
    • Nunes, Terezinha, Bryant, P., & Bindman, Miriam. (2006). The effects of learning to spell on children's awareness of morphology [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 767–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9025-y
    • Ramirez, Gloria, Chen, Xi, Geva, Esther, & Kiefer, Heidi. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9
    • Ravid, Dorit. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: Phonological and morphological factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011192806656
    • Reddy, Pooja P., & Koda, Keiko. (2013). Orthographic constraints on phonological awareness in biliteracy development. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.748639
    • Schiff, Rachel. (2003). The effects of morphology and word length on the reading of Hebrew nominals. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 263–287.
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Fowler, Anne E. (2004). Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(5), 483–515. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044598.81628.e6
    • Singson, Maria, Mahony, Diana, & Mann, Virginia. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 219–252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008196330239
    • Terry, Nicole Patton. (2006). Relations between dialect variation, grammar, and early spelling skills. Reading and Writing, 19(9), 907–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9023-0
    • Tsesmeli, Styliani N., & Seymour, Philip H. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 587–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9011-4
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, & Carlisle, Joanne F. (2006). Introduction to the special issue: Morphology in word identification and word spelling [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9010-5
  • Fowler, C. A., Liberman, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1977). On interpreting the error pattern of the beginning reader. Language and Speech, 20, 162–173. Cited by5
    • Brady, Susan, Gillis, Margie, Smith, Tara, Lavalette, MaryEllen, Liss-Bronstein, Linda, Lowe, Evelyn, North, Wendy, Russo, Evelyn, & Wilder, T. Diane. (2009). First grade teachers' knowledge of phonological awareness and code concepts: Examining gains from an intensive form of professional development and corresponding teacher attitudes [Special issue: Perspectives on teachers' disciplinary knowledge of reading processes, development, and pedagogy, edited by Anne Cunningham & Jamie Zibulsky]. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 425–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9166-x
    • Cossu, Giuseppe. (1999b). Biological constraints on literacy acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 213–237.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Treiman, Rebecca. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L. B. (1985). Relations between regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 13, 241–255. Cited by9
    • Beauvillain, Cecile, & Segui, Juan. (1992). Representation and processing of morphological information. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 377–388). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Burani, Cristina., & Laudanna, Alessandro. (1992). Units of representation for derived words in the lexicon. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 361–376). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Feldman, Laurie B. (1992). Morphological relationships revealed through the repetition priming task. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 239–254). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Feldman, Laurie B., & Andjelković, Darinka. (1992). Morphological analysis in word recognition. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Phonology, orthography, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 343–360). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Katherine. (2012). Morphological processing: A comparison of graded and categorical accounts. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–22). London: Psychology Press.
    • Kim, Jeesun, Taft, Marcus, & Davis, Chris. (2004). Orthographic-phonological links in the lexicon: When lexical and sublexical information conflict [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 187–218.
    • Masuda, Hisashi, & Joyce, Terry. (2005). A database of two-kanji compound words featuring morphological family, morphological structure, and semantic category data. In Katsuo Tamaoka, (Ed.), Corpus studies on Japanese kanji (Glottometrics 10) (pp. 30–44). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo; Lüdenschied, Germany: RAM-Verlag.
    • Ohala, John J. (1992). The costs and benefits of phonological analysis. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 211–237). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Smolka, Eva, Preller, Katrin H., & Eulitz, Carsten. (2014). ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
  • Fox, B., & Routh, D. K. (1975). Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables, and phonemes: A developmental study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 331–342. Cited by15
    • Bentin, Shlomo. (1992). Phonological awareness, reading, and reading acquisition: A survey and appraisal of current knowledge. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 193–210). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Burgess, Stephen R. (2002). The influence of speech perception, oral language ability, the home literacy environment, and pre-reading knowledge on the growth of phonological sensitivity: A one-year longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 709–737.
    • Casalis, Séverine, & Louis-Alexandre, Marie-France. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 303–335. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008177205648
    • Duncan, Lynne G. (2010). Phonological development from a cross-linguistic perspective. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 43–68). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2010). A psycholinguistic grain size view of reading acquisition across languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 23–42). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Kess, Joseph F., & Miyamoto, Tadao. (1999). The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Patel, Purushottam G. (1995). Brahmi scripts, Orthographic units and reading acquisition. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 265–275). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Veldhuis, Dorina, & Kurvers, Jeanne. (2012). Offline segmentation and online language processing units: The influence of literacy [Special issue: Units of language – units of writing, edited by Terry Joyce & David Roberts]. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.2.03vel
    • Wagner, Richard K., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192
    • Wang, Hsiao-Lan Sharon, Huss, Martina, Hämäläinen, Jarmo A., & Goswami, Usha. (2012). Basic auditory processing and developmental dyslexia in Chinese. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 509–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9284-5
  • Fox, B., & Routh, D. K. (1976). Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word-attack skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 70–74. Cited by7
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (2006). Alphabetics instruction helps students learn to read. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 649–677). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Harris, Margaret, & Gianouli, Vicky. (1999). Learning to read and spell in Greek: the importance of letter knowledge and morphological awareness. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 51–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Taylor, Insup. (1988). Psychology of literacy: East and west. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 202–233). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Wagner, Richard K., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192
  • Fox, B., & Routh, D. K. (1984). Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word attack skills: Revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1059–1064. Cited by12
    • Aaron, P. G., Joshi, R. M., Ayotollah, Mahboobeh, Ellsberry, Annie, Henderson, Janet, & Lindsey, Kim. (1999). Decoding and sight-word naming: Are they independent components of word recognition skill? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(2), 89–127.
    • Duncan, Lynne G., & Johnson, Rhona S. (1999). How does phonological awareness relate to nonword reading skill amongst poor readers? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 405–439.
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (2006). Alphabetics instruction helps students learn to read. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 649–677). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Ho, Connie Suk-Han, Law, Teresa Pui-Sze, & Ng, Penny Man. (2000). The phonological deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008040922662
    • Johnston, Rhona S., & Watson, Joyce E. (2004). Accelerating the development of reading, spelling and phonemic awareness skills in initial readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(4), 327–357.
    • Johnston, Rhona S., & Watson, Joyce E. (2006). The effectiveness of synthetic phonics teaching in developing reading and spelling skills in English-speaking boys and girls. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 679–691). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • O'Connor, Rollanda E., & Padeliadu, Susana. (2000). Blending versus whole word approaches in first grade remedial reading: Short-term and delayed effects on reading and spelling words. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 159–182.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Stringer, Ronald W., Toplak, Maggie E., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2004). Differential relationships between RAN performance, behaviour ratings, and executive function measures: Searching for a double dissociation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 891–914.
    • Wagner, Richard K., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192
  • Fox, James A., & Justeson, John S. (1984). Polyvalence in Mayan hieroglyphic writing. In John Justeson & Lyle Campbell (Eds.), Phoneticism in Maya hieroglyphic writing (Institute for Mesoamerican Studies 9) (pp. 17–76). Albany: State University of New York. Cited by7
    • Grube, Nikolai. (1994a). Mittelamerikanische Schriften [Central American scripts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 405–415). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Justeson, John. (1986). The origin of writing systems: Preclassic Mesoamerica. World Archaeology, 17(3), 437–457.
    • Macri, Martha J. (2000). Numeral classifiers and counted nouns in the classic Maya inscriptions [Special issue: Language and dialect in the Maya hieroglyphic script, edited by Gabrielle Vail & Martha J. Macri]. Written Language & Literacy, 3(1), 13–36.
    • Matsumoto, Mallory E. (2017). From sound to symbol: Orthographic semantization in Maya hieroglyphic writing. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1335634
    • Mora-Marín, David F. (2003). The origin of Mayan syllabograms and orthographic conventions. Written Language & Literacy, 6(2), 193–238.
    • Mora-Marín, David. (2010). Consonant deletion, obligatory synharmony, typical suffixing: An explanation of spelling practices in Mayan writing. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 118–179. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.05mor
    • Mora-Marín, David. (2016). A study in Mayan paleography: The history of T168/2M1a ʔAJAW ‘Lord, Ruler’ and the origin of the syllabogram T130/2S2 wa. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 35–74. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.02mor
  • Foy, J. G., & Mann, V. (2006). Changes in letter sound knowledge are associated with development of phonological awareness in pre-school children. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00279.x Cited by5
    • Foy, Judith G., & Mann, Virginia A. (2012). Speech production deficits in early readers: Predictors of risk. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 799–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9300-4
    • Homer, Bruce D. (2009). Literacy and metalinguistic development. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 487–500). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Jasińska, Kaja K., Frost, Stephen, Molfese, Peter, Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, Rueckl, Jay, & Pugh, Ken. (2016). Neuroimaging perspectives on skilled and impaired reading and the bilingual experience. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_3
    • Manolitsis, George, & Tafa, Eufimia. (2011). Letter-name letter-sound and phonological awareness: Evidence from Greek-speaking kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 24(1), 27–53. doi10.1007/s11145-009-9200-z
    • Treiman, Rebecca, Levin, Iris, & Kessler, Brett. (2012). Linking the shapes of alphabet letters to their sounds: The case of Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9286-3
  • Foy, Judith G., & Mann, Virginia A. (2012). Speech production deficits in early readers: Predictors of risk. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 799–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9300-4
  • Franceschini, S., Gori, S., Ruffino, M., Pedrolli, K., & Facoetti, A. (2012). A causal link between visual spatial attention and reading acquisition. Current Biology, 22(9), 814–819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.013 Cited by5
    • Catts, Hugh W. (2017). Early identification of reading disabilities. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 311–331). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Facoetti, Andrea, Franceschini, Sandro, & Gori, Simone. (2019). Role of visual attention in developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 307–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.014
    • Parrila, Rauno K., & Protopapas, Athanassios. (2017). Dyslexia and word reading problems. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 333–358). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Pennington, Bruce F., & Peterson, Robin L. (2015). Development of dyslexia. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 361–376). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Ziegler, Johannes C., Perry, Conrad, & Zorzi, Marco. (2019). Modeling the variability of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 350–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.016
  • Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Catts, H. W. & Tomblin, J. B. (2005). Dimensions affecting the assessment of reading comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 369–394). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by5
    • Adlof, Suzanne M., Catts, Hugh W., & Little, Todd D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19(9), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z
    • Andreassen, Rune, & Bråten, Ivar. (2010). Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different multiple-choice tests. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(3), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01413.x
    • Kim, Young-Suk, & Pallante, Daniel. (2012). Predictors of reading skills for kindergartners and first grade students in Spanish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9244-0
    • Landi, Nicole. (2010). An examination of the relationship between reading comprehension, higher-level and lower-level reading sub-skills in adults. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9180-z
    • Mellard, Daryl F., Fall, Emily, & Mark, Caroline. (2009). Reading profiles for adults with low-literacy: Cluster analysis with power and speeded measures. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 975–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9136-8
  • Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.3 Cited by17
    • Caravolas, Markéta, & Samara, Anna. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 326–343). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Compton, Donald L. (2000). Modeling the growth of decoding skills in first-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(3), 219–259.
    • Jacobson, Christer, & Lundberg, Ingvar. (2000). Early prediction of individual growth in reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 273–296.
    • Katzir, Tami, Lesaux, Nonie K., & Kim, Young-Suk. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9112-8
    • Lesaux, Nonie K., Lipka, Orly, & Siegel, Linda S. (2006). Investigating cognitive and linguistic abilities that influence the reading comprehension skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds [Special issue: Reading comprehension - Part II]. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4713-6
    • Lonigan, Christopher J., Farver, JoAnn M., Phillips, Beth M., & Clancy-Menchetti, Jeanine. (2011). Promoting the development of preschool children's emergent literacy skills: A randomized evaluation of a literacy-focused curriculum and two professional development models. Reading and Writing, 24(3), 305–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9214-6
    • Mancilla-Martinez, Jeannette, Kieffer, Michael J., Biancarosa, Gina, Christodoulou, Joanna A., & Snow, Catherine E. (2011). Investigating English reading comprehension growth in adolescent language minority learners: Some insights from the simple view. Reading and Writing, 24(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9215-5
    • Mansion, Andre D., Connor, Carol McDonald, & Duncan, Greg J. (2016). Policy and community influences on learning to read. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 149–165). London; New York: Routledge.
    • McDougall, Siné J. P., & Donohoe, Rachael. (2002). Reading ability and memory span: Long-term memory contributions to span for good and poor readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 359–387.
    • Nakamoto, Jonathan, Lindsey, Kim A., & Manis, Franklin R. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of English language learners' word decoding and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 20(7), 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9045-7
    • Nesan, Mimisha, Sadeghi, Amir, & Everatt, John. (2019). Literacy acquisition in the Malayalam orthography: Cognitive/linguistic influences within a multilingual context. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 85–101). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_5
    • Piasta, Shayne B., & Wagner, Richard K. (2008). Dyslexia: Identification and classification. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 309–326). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Stringer, Ron, & Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). The connection between reaction time and variation in reading ability: Unravelling covariance relationships with cognitive ability and phonological sensitivity. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(1), 41–53.
    • Vaughn, Sharon, & Hall, Colby. (2017). Theoretically guided interventions for adolescents who are poor readers. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 489–506). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Wagner, Richard K., Piasta, Shayne B., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (2006). Learning to read. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 1111–1142). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
  • Francis, W. N., & Kučera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Cited by18
    • Ashby, Jane, & Rayner, Keith. (2004). Representing syllable information during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 391–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000233 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 65–97). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Brysbaert, Marc, & New, Boris. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
    • Carello, Claudia, & Turvey, M. T., Lukatela, Georgije. (1992). Can theories of word recognition remain stubbornly nonphonological? In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 211–226). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Cheng, Chin-Chuan. (2000). Frequently-used Chinese characters and language cognition [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin W. Kim, Elmer H. Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 107–118.
    • Corrigan, Roberta. (2011). Effects of pre-service teachers' receptive vocabulary knowledge on their interactive read-alouds with elementary school students. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 749–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9223-5
    • Deavers, Rachael P., & Brown, Gordon D. A. (1997). Rules versus analogies in children's spelling: Evidence for task dependence [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 339–361.
    • Ku, Yu-Min, & Anderson, Richard C. (2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(5), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024227231216
    • Leong, Che-Kan. (2002a). ‘Cognitive conjunction’ analysis of processing Chinese. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 1–31). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • LeVasseur, Valerie Marciarille, Macaruso, Paul, & Shankweiler, Donald. (2008). Promoting gains in reading fluency: A comparison of three approaches. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9070-1
    • Meuter, Renata F. I., & Ehrich, John F. (2012). The acquisition of an artificial logographic script and bilingual working memory: Evidence for L1-specific orthographic processing skills transfer in Chinese-English bilinguals [Special issue: Second language writing systems, edited by Benedetta Bassetti, Jyotsna Vaid, & Vivian Cook]. Writing Systems Research, 4(1), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.665011
    • Pollatsek, Alexander, & Hyönä, Jukka. (2006). Processing of morphemically complex words in context: What can be learned from eye movements. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 275–298). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Reichle, Erik D., & Sheridan, Heather. (2015). E-Z reader: An overview of the model and two recent applications. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 277–290). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Riano, Adriana, & Margolin, Sara J. (2017). But spell checker always corrects witch words eye misspelled: Spell checker use among good and poor spellers. Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00001.ria
    • Smith-Lock, Karen M., Nickels, Lyndsey, & Mortensen, Lynne. (2009). Story writing skills of adults with a history language-impairment [Special issue: Lexical representations in reading and writing, edited by Joanne Arciuli]. Reading and Writing, 22(6), 713–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9138-6
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1995). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.3 [2014, Revised edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14)]
  • Frangou, Satu-Maarit, Ruokamo, Heli, Parviainen, Tiina, & Wikgren, Jan. (2018). Can you put your finger on it? The effects of writing modality on Finnish students' recollection. Writing Systems Research, 10(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/17586801.2018.1536015 Cited by1
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
  • Franklin, S. (2002). Writing, society and culture in Early Rus, c. 950–1300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by5
    • Boeckeler, Erika Mary. (2017). Playful letters: A study in early modern alphabetics. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
    • Kornicki, Peter Francis. (2018). Languages, scripts, and Chinese texts in East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198797821.001
    • Rhoby, Andreas. (2017). Text as art? Byzantine inscriptions and their display. In Irene Berti, Katharina Bolle, Fanny Opdenhoff, & Fabian Stroth (Eds.), Writing matters: Presenting and perceiving monumental inscriptions in antiquity and the middle ages (Materiale Textkulturen 14) (pp. 265–283). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110534597-011
    • Salomon, Corinna. (2021). Comparative perspectives on the study of script transfer, and the origin of the runic script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 143–199). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-salo
    • van den Hout, Theo. (2020). A history of Hittite literacy: Writing and reading in Late Bronze-Age Anatolia (1650–1200 BC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860161
  • Franks, Bridget A., Mulhern, Sharon L., & Schillinger, Susan M. (1997). Reasoning in a reading context: Deductive inferences in basal reading series. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(4), 285–312.
  • Frase, L. T., Keenan, S. A., & Dever, J. J. (1980). Human performance in computer aided writing and documentation. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma, (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 405–416). New York; London: Plenum Press. Cited by1
    • Wright, Patricia. (1980). Textual literacy: An outline sketch of psychological research on reading and writing. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 517–535). New York; London: Plenum Press.
  • Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance: VII. The psychology of reading (pp. 559–586). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cited by5
    • Ferreira, Fernanda, & Henderson, John M. (1993). Reading processes during syntactic analysis and reanalysis. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 247–275. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 119–147). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina. (2018). English compounds and their spelling (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Staub, Adrian. (2015). Reading sentences: Syntactic parsing and semantic interpretation. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 202–216). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291–325. Cited by6
    • Flores d'Arcais, Giovanni B. (1992). Graphemic, phonological and semantic activation processes during the recognition of Chinese characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 37–66). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Just, Marcel Adam, & Carpenter, Patricia A. (1995). The intensity dimension of thought: Pupillometric indices of sentence processing. In John M. Henderson, Murray Singer, & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 182–211). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Magnuson, James S. (2008). Nondeterminism, pleiotropy, and single-word reading: Theoretical and practical concerns. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 377–404). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Mishra, Ramesh K., Pandey, Aparna, & Srinivasan, Narayanan. (2011). Revisiting the scrambling complexity hypothesis in sentence processing: A self-paced reading study on anomaly detection and scrambling in Hindi [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 709–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9255-x
    • Pynte, Joël, & Noizet, Georges. (1980). Optimal segmentation for sentences displayed on a video screen. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 375–385). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
  • Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1 Cited by23
    • Bailin, Alan, & Grafstein, Ann. (2016). Readability: Text and context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Bredel, Ursula. (2002). The dash in German. In Martin Neef, Anneke Neijt, & Richard Sproat, (Eds.), The relation of writing to spoken language (Linguistische Arbeiten, 460) (pp. 131–146). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
    • Ferreira, Fernanda, & Henderson, John M. (1993). Reading processes during syntactic analysis and reanalysis. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 247–275. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 119–147). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Henderson, John M., & Ferreira, Fernanda. (1993). Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 201–221. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 73–93). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Hermena, Ehab W., Bouamama, Sana, Liversedge, Simon P., & Drieghe, Denis. (2021). Does diacritics-based lexical disambiguation modulate word frequency, length, and predictability effects? An eye-movements investigation of processing Arabic diacritics. PLoS ONE, 16(11), e0259987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259987
    • Inhoff, Albrecht W., & Rayner, Keith. (1996). Das Blickverhalten beim Lesen [Eye movements during reading]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 942–957). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Magnuson, James S. (2008). Nondeterminism, pleiotropy, and single-word reading: Theoretical and practical concerns. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 377–404). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Minkoff, Scott R. B., & Raney, Gary E. (2000). Letter-detection errors in the word the: Word frequency versus syntactic structure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(1), 55–76.
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Rayner, Keith, Schotter, Elizabeth R., Masson, Michael E. J., Potter, Mary C., & Treiman, Rebecca. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. doi10.1177/1529100615623267
    • Reichle, Erik D., & Sheridan, Heather. (2015). E-Z reader: An overview of the model and two recent applications. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 277–290). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2012). Eye movements and word recognition during reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 73–101). London: Psychology Press.
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2015). The work of the eyes during reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 44–59). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Shillcock, Richard. (2007). Eye movements and visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Slattery, Timothy J. (2016). Eye movements: From psycholinguistics to font design. In Mary C. Dyson & Ching Y. Suen (Eds.), Digital fonts and reading Series on Computer Processing of Languages 1) (pp. 54–78). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Spivey-Knowlton, Michael J., Trueswell, John C., & Tanenhaus, Michael K. (1995). Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: Discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. In John M. Henderson, Murray Singer, & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 148–181). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Staub, Adrian. (2015). Reading sentences: Syntactic parsing and semantic interpretation. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 202–216). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • White, Sarah J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.205
  • Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1987). Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movments in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 505–526. Cited by5
    • Liu, In-Mao. (1998). A slot-filling model of sentence comprehension [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 255–266. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 101–112). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Minkoff, Scott R. B., & Raney, Gary E. (2000). Letter-detection errors in the word the: Word frequency versus syntactic structure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(1), 55–76.
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Rayner, Keith, Schotter, Elizabeth R., Masson, Michael E. J., Potter, Mary C., & Treiman, Rebecca. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. doi10.1177/1529100615623267
  • Frederiksen, J. R. (1978). Assessment of perceptual, decoding, and lexical skills and their relation to reading proficiency. In A. M. Lesgold, J. W. Pellegrino, S. D. Fokkema, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Cognitive psychology and instruction. New York: Plenum. Cited by3
    • Barron, Roderick W. (1981). Reading skill and reading strategies. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 299–327). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Lesgold, Alan M., & Curtis, Mary E. (1981). Learning to read words efficiently. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 329–360). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Lesgold, Alan M., & Perfetti, Charles A. (1981). Interactive processes in reading: Where do we stand? In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 387–407). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Frederiksen, John R. (1981). Sources of process interactions in reading. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 361–386). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by1
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
  • Frederiksen, J. R., & Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 361–379. Cited by20
    • Ashby, Jane, & Rayner, Keith. (2004). Representing syllable information during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 391–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000233 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 65–97). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Besner, Derek, & Smith, Marilyn Chapnik. (1992). Basic processes in reading: Is the orthographic depth hypothesis sinking? In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 45–66). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Bijeljac-Babic, Ranka, Millogo, Victor, Farioli, Fernand, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). A developmental investigation of word length effects in reading using a new on-line word identification paradigm. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(4), 411–431.
    • Carlisle, Joanne F., & Katz, Lauren A. (2006). Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 669–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5766-2
    • Colombo, Lucia, & Tabossi, Patrizia. (1992). Strategies and stress assignment: Evidence from a shallow orthography. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 319–340). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Coltheart, Max. (2012). Dual-route theories of reading aloud. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–27). London: Psychology Press.
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Glushko, Robert J. (1981). Principles for pronouncing print: The psychology of phonography. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 61–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Katz, Leonard, & Feldman, Laurie B. (1981). Linguistic coding in word recognition: Comparisons between a deep and a shallow orthography. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 85–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Liu, In-Mao. (1995). Script factors that affect literacy: Alphabetic vs. logographic languages. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 145–162). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Marcolini, Stefania, Burani, Cristina, & Colombo, Lucia. (2009). Lexical effects on children's pseudoword reading in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9123-0
    • Paradis, Michel, Hagiwara, Hiroko, & Hildebrandt, Nancy. (1985). Neurolinguistic aspects of the Japanese writing system (Perspectives in Neurolinguistics, Neuropsychology, and Psycholinguistics). Tokyo; Orlando, FL; London: Academic Press.
    • Raman, Ilhan, Raman, Evren, İkier, Simay, Kilecioğlu, Elçin, Eroğlu, Dilek Uzun, & Zeyveli, Şebnem. (2018). Differential effects of age of acquisition and frequency on memory: Evidence from free recall of pictures and words in Turkish. Writing Systems Research, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1420727
    • Seidenberg, Mark S., & McClelland, James L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Vitrano-Wilson, Seth. (2016). Reading syllable-spaced versus word-spaced text in Hmong Daw: Breaking up isn't so hard to do. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1225562
    • Volkovyskaya, Evgenia, Raman, Ilhan, & Baluch, Bahman. (2017). Age of acquisition (AoA) effect in monolingual Russian and bilingual Russian (L1)-English (L2) speakers in a free recall task. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1405136
  • Freebody, P., & Byrne, B. (1988). Word-reading strategies in elementary school children: Relations to comprehension, reading time, and phonemic awareness. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(4), 441–453. Cited by9
    • Aaron, P. G., Joshi, R. M., Ayotollah, Mahboobeh, Ellsberry, Annie, Henderson, Janet, & Lindsey, Kim. (1999). Decoding and sight-word naming: Are they independent components of word recognition skill? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(2), 89–127.
    • Andrews, Sally. (2012). Individual differences in skilled visual word recognition and reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 151–172). London: Psychology Press.
    • Cunningham, Anne E., Perry, Kathryn E., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011100226798
    • Eme, Elsa, & Golder, Caroline. (2005). Word-reading and word-spelling styles of French beginners: Do all children learn to read and spell in the same way? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 157–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-6409-8
    • McClung, Nicola A., O'Donnell, Colleen R., & Cunningham, Anne E. (2012). Orthographic learning and the development of visual word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 173–195). London: Psychology Press.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Templeton, Shane, & Bear, Donald R. (1992). A summary and synthesis: “Teaching the lexicon to read and spell”. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Vellutino, Frank. (1992). Afterword. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 353–357). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Frehner, C. (2008). Email – SMS – MMS: The linguistic creativity of asynchronous discourse in the new media age (Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication). Bern; New York: Peter Lang. Cited by5
    • Forster, Iris, Borgwald, Susanne R., & Neef, Martin. (2012). Form follows function: Interjections and onomatopoetica in comics [Special issue: The writing system at play, edited by Vivian Cook, Benedetta Bassetti, & Jyotsna Vaid]. Writing Systems Research, 4, 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.751348
    • Grace, Abbie, Kemp, Nenagh, Martin, Frances Heritage, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Undergraduates' use of text messaging language: Effects of country and collection method [Special issue: The writing system at play, edited by Vivian Cook, Benedetta Bassetti, & Jyotsna Vaid]. Writing Systems Research, 4, 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.712875
    • Shortis, Tim. (2016). Texting and other messaging: Written system in digitally mediated vernaculars. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 487–516). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Verheijen, Lieke. (2018). Orthographic principles in computer-mediated communication: The SUPER-functions of textisms and their interaction with age and medium [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 111–145. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00012.ver
    • Wood, Clare, Kemp, Nenagh, & Plester, Beverley. (2013). Text messaging and literacy - The evidence (Routledge Psychology in Education). London; New York: Routledge.
  • Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey. Cited by6
    • Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [2007, Second edition]
    • Graff, Harvey J. (1987a). The labyrinths of literacy: Reflections on literacy past and present. London: The Falmer Press. [1995, Revised and expanded edition, (Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture), Pittsburgh, PA; London: University of Pittsburgh Press]
    • Johnson, Merieta. (1994). Literacy movements in Central and South America and in the Carribean. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 824–834). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Lloyd, Carol V. (2003). [Book review: Margaret A. Gallego & Sandra Hollingsworth (Eds.), (2000), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard]. Written Language & Literacy, 6(1), 111–115.
    • Street, Brian V., & Lefstein, Adam. (2007). Literacy: An advanced resource book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Weth, Constanze, & Juffermans, Kasper. (2018b). Introduction: The tyranny of writing in language and society. In Constanze Weth & Kasper Juffermans (Eds.), Tyranny of writing: Ideologies of the written word (Bloomsbury Advances in Sociolinguistics) (pp. 1–17). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Frellesvig, B. (2010). A history of the Japanese language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by10
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Handel, Zev. (2019). Sinography: The borrowing and adaptation of the Chinese script (Language, Writing and Literary Culture in the Sinographic Cosmopolis 1). Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352223
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2019). What do kanji graphs represent in the current Japanese writing system? Towards a unified model of kanji as written signs. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 185–208). Brest: Fluxus Editions. http://www.fluxus-editions.fr/gla1-hond.pdf
    • Honda, Keisuke. (2021). A modular theoretic approach to the Japanese writing system: Possibilities and challenges. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 621–643). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-hond
    • Kornicki, Peter Francis. (2018). Languages, scripts, and Chinese texts in East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198797821.001
    • Matsumoto, Mallory E. (2017). From sound to symbol: Orthographic semantization in Maya hieroglyphic writing. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1335634
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Robertson, Wesley C. (2020). Scripting Japan: Orthography, variation, and the creation of meaning in written Japanese (Routledge Studies in Sociolinguistics). London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331008
    • Sato, Eriko. (2018). Sociocultural implications of the Japanese multi-scripts: Translanguaging in translation. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 313–332). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Unger, J. Marshall. (2012). Describing old Japanese kanji usage: The inadequacy of traditional terminology. Scripta, 4, 93–105.
  • French, M. A. (1976). Observations on the Chinese script, and classification of writing-systems. In William Haas (Ed.), Writing without letters (pp. 101–129). Manchester: Manchester University Press. Cited by9
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Cruttenden, Alan. (2021). Writing systems and phonetics. London; New York: Routledge.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag]
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Haas, William. (1983). Determining the level of a script. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 15–29). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Osterkamp, Sven, & Schreiber, Gordian. (2021). Challenging the dichotomy between phonography and morphography: Transitions and gray areas. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 47–82). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-oste
    • Stubbs, Michael. (1980). Language and literacy: The sociolinguistics of reading and writing. London; Boston; Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Friberg, Jöran. (1984). Numbers and measures in the earliest written records. Scientific American, 250(2), 110–118. Cited by5
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Jasim, Sabah Abboud, & Oates, Joan. (1986). Early tokens and tablets in Mesopotamia: New information from Tell Abada and Tell Brak. World Archaeology, 17(3), 348–362.
    • Nissen, Hans. (1986). The archaic texts from Uruk. World Archaeology, 17(3), 317–334.
    • Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. (1984). Before numerals. Visible Language, 18(1), 48–60.
    • Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. (1992). Before writing [Two volumes: Volume 1. From counting to cuneiform; Volume 2. A catalog of near eastern tokens]. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Fricke, Silke, Szczerbinski, Marcin, Stackhouse, Joy, & Fox-Boyer, Annette V. (2008). Predicting individual differences in early literacy acquisition in German: The role of speech and language processing skills and letter knowledge [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 103–146. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.02fri Cited by2
    • Noack, Christina. (2009). Can secondary pupils train decoding skills?: An empirical study on phonological reading errors. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.05noa
    • Treutlein, Anke, Zöller, Isabelle, Roos, Jeanette, & Schöler, Hermann. (2008). Effects of phonological awareness training on reading achievement [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.03tre
  • Friedman, R. B. (1980). Identity without form: Abstract representations of letters. Perception and Psychophysics, 28(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204315 Cited by6
    • Jurdant, Baudouin. (1988). The role of vowels in alphabetic writing. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 381–400). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Primus, Beatrice. (2004). A featural analysis of the Modern Roman Alphabet [Special issue: From letter to sound, edited by Martin Neef & Beatrice Primus]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(2), 235–274. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.2.06pri
    • Rayner, Keith, Schotter, Elizabeth R., Masson, Michael E. J., Potter, Mary C., & Treiman, Rebecca. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. doi10.1177/1529100615623267
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Taylor, M. Martin. (1988). The bilateral cooperative model of reading. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 322–361). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Friedmann, Naama, & Haddad-Hanna, Manar. (2014). Types of Developmental Dyslexia in Arabic. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 119–151). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Friedrich, Bodo. (1996). Aspekte und Probleme des Schreibunterrichts: Rechtschreiben [Aspects and problems of the teaching of writing: Spelling]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1249–1260). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Friedrich, Johannes. (1954). Entzifferung verschollener Schriften und Sprachen. Berlin: Springer. [1957, Extinct languages (Translated by Frank Gaynor). New York: Philosophical Library; 1966a, Second edition, (Verständliche Wissenschaft 51), Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer] Cited by13
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996d). Methods of decipherment. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 141–159). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2020). The decipherment of ancient Near Eastern languages. In Rebecca Hasselbach-Andee (Ed.), A companion to ancient Near Eastern languages (pp. 3–25). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Ehlich, Konrad. (1983). Development of writing as social problem solving. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 99–129). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Gaur, Albertine. (1984). A history of writing. London: British Library. [1987, Second edition; 1992, Third revised edition, London: British Library; New York: Abbeville Press]
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Pope, Maurice. (1975). The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphics to Linear B. London: Thames & Hudson: New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. [1999, Revised edition, The story of decipherment: From Egyptian hieroglyphs to Maya script. London; New York: Thames & Hudson]
    • Schoch, Robert M., & Melka, Tomi S. (2021). A “Sacred Amulet from Easter Island—1885/6—”: Analyzing enigmatic glyphic characters in the context of the rongorongo script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 847–903). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-scho
    • Segert, Stanislav. (1983). Decipherment of forgotten writing systems: Two different approaches. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 131–156). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Segert, Stanislav. (1994). Decipherment. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 416–423). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • The Unicode Consortium. (1991). The Unicode Standard: Version 1.0. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [1996, Version 2.0; 2003, Version, 4.0.0; 2005, Version 5.0; 2011, Version 6.0.0; 2016, Version 9.0.0; 2018, Version 11.0.0]
  • Friedrich, Johannes. (1957). Extinct languages (Translated by Frank Gaynor). New York: Philosophical Library. [1954, Entzifferung verschollener Schriften und Sprachen. Berlin: Springer; 1966a, Second edition, (Verständliche Wissenschaft 51), Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer] Cited by10
    • Bhatt, Prath M. (1988). Graphic systems, phonic systems, and linguistic representations. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 106–120). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Boone, Elizabeth Hill. (1994a). Introduction: Writing and recorded knowledge. In Elizabeth Hill Boone & Walter D. Mignolo (Eds.), Writing without words: Alternative literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes (pp. 3–26). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996d). Methods of decipherment. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 141–159). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2020). The decipherment of ancient Near Eastern languages. In Rebecca Hasselbach-Andee (Ed.), A companion to ancient Near Eastern languages (pp. 3–25). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Schoch, Robert M., & Melka, Tomi S. (2021). A “Sacred Amulet from Easter Island—1885/6—”: Analyzing enigmatic glyphic characters in the context of the rongorongo script. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 847–903). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-scho
    • Segert, Stanislav. (1994). Decipherment. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 416–423). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • The Unicode Consortium. (1991). The Unicode Standard: Version 1.0. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [1996, Version 2.0; 2003, Version, 4.0.0; 2005, Version 5.0; 2011, Version 6.0.0; 2016, Version 9.0.0; 2018, Version 11.0.0]
    • Trager, George L. (1974). Writing and writing systems. In Thomas A. Sebeok (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics (Linguistics and Adjacent Arts and Sciences 12) (pp. 373–469). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
  • Friedrich, Johannes. (1966a). Entzifferung verschollener Schriften und Sprachen (Second edition) (Verständliche Wissenschaft 51), Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer. [1954, First edition; 1957, Extinct languages (Translated by Frank Gaynor). New York: Philosophical Library] Cited by4
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996d). Methods of decipherment. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 141–159). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (1997). Rongorongo: The Easter Island script: History, traditions, texts (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 14). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Krebernik, Manfred, & Nissen, Hans J. (1994). Die sumerisch-akkadische Keilschrift [Sumerian-Accadic cuneiform scripts]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 274–288). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Parpola, Asko. (1986). The Indus script: A challenging puzzle. World Archaeology, 17(3), 399–419.
  • Friedrich, Johannes. (1966b). Geschichte der Schrift unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer geistigen Entwicklung. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. Cited by18
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996b). The study of writing systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 3–17). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2001). Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 43–80). Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. [2017, Second edition, (pp. 75–94)]
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2006). On beyond alphabets [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.03dan
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2009a). Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 25–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2017a). The writing systems of Indo-European. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph, & Matthias Fritz (Eds.) in cooperation with Mark Wenthe, Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 41.1) (pp. 26–61). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261288-00
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Eisenberg, Peter. (1996a). Sprachsystem und Schriftsystem [Language system and writing system]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1368–1380). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (1997). Rongorongo: The Easter Island script: History, traditions, texts (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 14). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Gallmann, Peter. (1986). The graphic elements of German written Language. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 43–79). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Glück, Helmut. (1994). Schriften im Kontakt [Writing systems in contact]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 745–766). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Haas, William. (1983). Determining the level of a script. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 15–29). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • Jensen, Hans. (1935). Die Schrift in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Glückstadt; Hamburg: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften VEB. [1958, Second edition; 1968, Third edition; 1969, Sign, symbol and script: An account of man's efforts to write (Translated by George Unwin). London: George Allen & Unwin; New York: Putman's]
    • O'Connor, M. (1996b). The Berber scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 112–116). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • The Unicode Consortium. (1991). The Unicode Standard: Version 1.0. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [1996, Version 2.0; 2003, Version, 4.0.0; 2005, Version 5.0; 2011, Version 6.0.0; 2016, Version 9.0.0; 2018, Version 11.0.0]
  • Fries, Charles C. (1952). The structure of English. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. Cited by5
    • Cook, Vivian. (2004). The English writing system. (The English Language series). London Hodder Arnold. [2014, reprinted, London: New York: Routledge]
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Dutka, Julia To. (1980). Anaphoric relations, comprehension and readability. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 537–549). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Gibson, Eleanor J., & Levin, Harry. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
  • Fries, Charles C. (1962). Linguistics and reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Cited by15
    • Berry, Jack. (1977). ‘The making of alphabets’ revisited. In Joshua A. Fishman, (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 3–16). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Calfee, Robert C. (2005). The exploration of English orthography. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 1–19). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Gibson, Eleanor J., & Levin, Harry. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Gough, Philip B. (1972). One second of reading. In James F. Kavanagh & Ignatius G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 331–358). Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
    • Hung, Yueh-Nu. (2012b). Similarities and dissimilarities in reading Chinese and English: Goodman's reading model perspective. In Ken Goodman, Shaomei Wang, Mieko Shimizu Iventosch, & Yetta Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 32–44). New York; London: Routledge.
    • LeVasseur, Valerie Marciarille, Macaruso, Paul, & Shankweiler, Donald. (2008). Promoting gains in reading fluency: A comparison of three approaches. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9070-1
    • Manolitsis, George, & Tafa, Eufimia. (2011). Letter-name letter-sound and phonological awareness: Evidence from Greek-speaking kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 24(1), 27–53. doi10.1007/s11145-009-9200-z
    • Mattingly, Ignatius G. (1972). Reading, the linguistic process, and linguistic awareness. In James F. Kavanagh & Ignatius G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 133–147). Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
    • Rector, Monica. (1994). A note on teaching writing to Rio slum children. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 59–65). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Savin, Harris B. (1972). What the child knows about speech when he starts to learn to read. In James F. Kavanagh & Ignatius G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 319–326). Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Liberman, Isabelle Y. (1972). Misreading: A search for causes. In James F. Kavanagh & Ignatius G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 293–317). Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Venezky, Richard L. (1970c). The structure of English orthography (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor 82). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Venezky, Richard L. (1977). Principles for the design of practical writing systems. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 8) (pp. 37–54). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Woodrome, Stacey E., & Johnson, Kathy E. (2009). The role of visual discrimination in the learning-to-read process. Reading and Writing, 22(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9104-8
  • Friesen, Deanna C., & Joanisse, Marc F. (2012). Homophone effects in deaf readers: Evidence from lexical decision. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9275-6
  • Frijters, J. C., Barron, R. W., & Brunello, M. (2000). Direct and mediated influences of home literacy and literacy interest on prereaders' oral vocabulary and early written language skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 466–477. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.466 Cited by8
    • Davidse, Neeltje J., De Jong, Maria T., Bus, Adriana G., Huijbregts, Stephan C. J., & Swaab, Hanna. (2011). Cognitive and environmental predictors of early literacy skills [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9233-3
    • Evans, Mary Ann, & Saint-Aubin, Jean. (2010). An eye for print: Child and adult attention to print during shared book reading. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 43–53). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_4
    • Foulin, Jean Noel. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2
    • Kim, Young-Suk. (2009c). The relationship between home literacy practices and developmental trajectories of emergent literacy and conventional literacy skills for Korean children. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9103-9
    • Schwarz, Mila, & Shaul, Shelley. (2018). Towards a better understanding of the link between executive functions, early literacy, and emergent mathematical abilities. Written Language & Literacy, 21(2), 238–268. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00016.sch
    • Sénéchal, Monique. (2015). Young children's home literacy experiences. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 397–414). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Sénéchal, Monique, Whissell, Josée, & Bildfell, Ashley. (2017). Starting from home: Home literacy practices that make a difference. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 384–407). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Frinken, Volkmar, & Bunke, Horst. (2014). Continuous handwritten script recognition. In David Doermann & Karl Tombre (Eds.), Handbook of document image processing and recognition (pp. 391–425). London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-859-1_12
  • Frisson, S., Niswander-Klement, E., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712607X181304 Cited by6
    • Hyönä, Jukka. (2015). Are polymorphemic words processed differently from other words during reading? In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 114–128). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Koh, Poh Wee, Chen, Xi, & Gottardo, Alexandra. (2018). How do phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and vocabulary knowledge relate to word reading within and between English and Chinese? In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 73–98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Pollatsek, Alexander, & Hyönä, Jukka. (2006). Processing of morphemically complex words in context: What can be learned from eye movements. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 275–298). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Vitrano-Wilson, Seth. (2016). Reading syllable-spaced versus word-spaced text in Hmong Daw: Breaking up isn't so hard to do. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1225562
  • Frisson, S., Rayner, K., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 862–877. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.862 Cited by6
    • Hermena, Ehab W., Bouamama, Sana, Liversedge, Simon P., & Drieghe, Denis. (2021). Does diacritics-based lexical disambiguation modulate word frequency, length, and predictability effects? An eye-movements investigation of processing Arabic diacritics. PLoS ONE, 16(11), e0259987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259987
    • Lin, Tsu-Jung, Anderson, Richard C., Ku, Yu-Min, Christianson, Kiel, & Packard, Jerome L. (2011). Chinese children's concept of word [Special issue: Linguistic and cognitive factors in reading Chinese, edited by Xi Chen & Yang C. Luo]. Writing Systems Research, 3(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr007
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, & Pollatsek, Alexander. (2006). Eye-movement control in reading. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 613–657). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Shillcock, Richard. (2007). Eye movements and visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Frisson, S., & Sandra, D. (2002). Homophonic forms of regularly inflected verbs have their own orthographic representations: A developmental perspective on spelling errors. Brain and Language, 81, 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2546 Cited by8
    • Bosman, Anna M. T. (2005). Development of rule-based verb spelling in Dutch students. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.01bos
    • Brissaud, Catherine, & Chevrot, Jean-Pierre. (2011). The late acquisition of a major difficulty of French inflectional orthography: The homophonic /E/ verbal endings. Writing Systems Research, 3(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr003
    • Chamalaun, Robert J. P. M., Bosman, Anna M. T., & Ernestus, Mirjam T. C. (2021). The role of grammar in spelling homophonous regular verbs. Written Language & Literacy, 24(1), 38–80. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00047.cha
    • Hanssen, Esther, Schreuder, Robert, & Neijt, Anneke. (2015). From t-bias to d-bias in Dutch: Evidence from children's spelling and pronunciation. Written Language & Literacy, 18(1), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.05han
    • Juul, Holger, & Elbro, Carsten. (2004). The links between grammar and spelling: A cognitive hurdle in deep orthographies? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 915–942.
    • Sandra, Dominiek, Frisson, Steven, & Daems, Frans. (2004). Still errors after all those years ...: Limited attentional resources and homophone frequency account for spelling errors on silent verb suffixes in Dutch [Special issue: Process and acquisition of written language, edited by Robert Schreuder & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(1), 61–77.
    • Surkyn, Hanne, Vandekerckhove, Reinhild, & Sandra, Dominiek. (2021). The impact of analogical effects and social factors on the spelling of partially homophonous verb forms in informal social media writing. Written Language & Literacy, 24(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00046.sur
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, & Carlisle, Joanne F. (2006). Introduction to the special issue: Morphology in word identification and word spelling [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9010-5
  • Frith, Uta. (1979). Reading by eye and writing by ear. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 379–390). New York; London: Plenum Press. Cited by17
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Frith, Uta. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). Hove; Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Kolers, Paul A. (1983). Polarization of reading performance. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 371–391). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
    • McConkie, George W., & Zola, David. (1981). Language constraints and the functional stimulus in reading. In Alan M. Lesgold & Charles A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 155–175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Mora-Marín, David. (2010). Consonant deletion, obligatory synharmony, typical suffixing: An explanation of spelling practices in Mayan writing. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 118–179. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.05mor
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [1987, Reprinted with corrections; 2015, Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing]
    • Schaefer, Ronald P. (1992). Interpreting Emai orthographic strategies. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 153–168). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Smith, Philip T., & Groat, Anne. (1979). Spelling patterns, letter cancellation and the processing of text. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 (pp. 309–324). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Tzeng, Ovid J. L., & Hung, Daisy L. (1988b). Orthography, reading, and cerebral functions. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 273–290). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Tzeng, Ovid J. L., Hung, Daisy L., Lee, Wei Ling, & Chang, Ji-Mei. (1996). Cross-Linguistic analyses of basic reading processes. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1101–1117). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Underwood, Geoffrey, & Underwood, Jean. (1986). Cognitive processes in reading and spelling. In Asher Cashdan (Ed.), Literacy: Teaching and learning language skills (pp. 32–60). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Wright, Patricia. (1980). Textual literacy: An outline sketch of psychological research on reading and writing. In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 2 (pp. 517–535). New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Yule, Valerie, & Ishi, Yasuko. (2016). Spelling reform. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 413–427). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Frith, Uta. (1980a). Introduction. In Uta Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 1–5). London; New York: Academic Press.
  • Frith, Uta. (1980b). Unexpected spelling problems. In Uta Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 495–515). London; New York: Academic Press. Cited by43
    • Andrews, Sally, & Bond, Rachel. (2009). Lexical expertise and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down processing of lexical ambiguity [Special issue: Lexical representations in reading and writing, edited by Joanne Arciuli]. Reading and Writing, 22(6), 687–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9137-7
    • Angelelli, Paola, Marinelli, Chiara Valeria, & Zoccolotti, Pierluigi. (2010). Single or dual orthographic representations for reading and spelling? A study of Italian dyslexic-dysgraphic and normal children. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(4), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2010.543539
    • Burt, Jennifer S., & Fury, Mary B. (2000). Spelling in adults: The role of reading skills and experience. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 1–30.
    • Caravolas, Marketa. (2006). Learning to spell in different languages: How orthographic variables might affect early literacy. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 497–511). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Caravolas, Markéta, Mikulajová, Marína, & Kuchaská, Anna. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Czech and Slovak. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 96–117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.005
    • Cho, Jeung-Ryeul. (2018). Cognitive-linguistic skills and reading and writing in Korean Hangul, Chinese Hanja, and English among Korean children. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 391–410). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Cossu, Giuseppe. (1999a). The acquisition of Italian orthography. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 10–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Curtin, Suzanne, Manis, Franklin R., & Seidenberg, Mark. S. (2001). Parallels between the reading and spelling deficits of two subgroups of developmental dyslexics. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 515–547. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011122219046
    • Dixon, Maureen, & Kaminska, Zofia. (1997). Is it misspelled or is it mispelled? The influence of fresh orthographic information on spelling [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 483–498.
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (1992b). Review and commentary: Stages of spelling development. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 307–332). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Fletcher-Flinn, Claire M., Shankweiler, Donald, & Frost, Stephen J. (2004). Coordination of reading and spelling in early literacy development: An examination of the discrepancy hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 617–644.
    • Frith, Uta. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). Hove; Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Frith, Uta. (1986b). Psychologische Aspekte des orthographischen Wissens: Entwicklung und Entwicklungsstörung [Psychological aspects of orthographic skills : Development and disorder]. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 218–233). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Gill, J. Thomas. (1992). The relationship between word recognition and spelling. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 79–104). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Hatta, Takeshi, Kawakami, Ayako, & Hatasa, Yukiko. (1997). Kanji writing errors in Japanese college students and American Japanese learners. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 401–416). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Holmes, Virginia M., & Babauta, Mariko L. (2005). Single or dual representations for reading and spelling? [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 257–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-8129-5
    • Holmes, Virginia M., & Malone, N. (2004). Adult spelling strategies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 537–566.
    • Invemizzi, Marcia A. (1992). The vowel and what follows: A phonological frame of orthographic analysis. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 105–136). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Kay, Janice. (1996). Psychological aspects of spelling. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1074–1094). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Kwong, Tru E., Desjarlais, Malinda, & Duffy, Megan L. (2015). Aer yuo looking cloesly? Even good spellers are impacted by partial cue reading. Written Language & Literacy, 18(1), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.04kwo
    • Landerl, Karin. (2017). Learning to read German. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 299–322). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Lewis, Barbara A., Freebairn, Lisa A., & Taylor, H. Gerry. (2002). Correlates of spelling abilities in children with early speech sound disorders. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 389–407.
    • Liu, Duo, & Zhu, Xiaoqin. (2016). The associations of phonological awareness, morphological awareness, orthographic awareness and RAN with Hong Kong Chinese children's literacy performance at word level. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218747
    • McGuinness, Diane. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Mohamed, Wessam, Landerl, Karin, & Elbert, Thomas. (2014). An epidemiological survey of specific reading and spelling disabilities in Arabic speaking children in Egypt. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 99–117). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Mora-Marín, David. (2010). Consonant deletion, obligatory synharmony, typical suffixing: An explanation of spelling practices in Mayan writing. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 118–179. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.05mor
    • Pattison, Helen. (1986). Orthographic skills in the hearing-impaired. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 341–353). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Porpodas, Costas D. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Greek: Research review of the role of phonological and cognitive factors. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 189–199). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Roncoli, Silvia, & Masterson, Jackie. (2016). ‘Unexpected’ spelling difficulty in a 10-year-old child with good reading skills: An intervention case study. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1159539
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [1987, Reprinted with corrections; 2015, Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing]
    • Schaefer, Ronald P. (1992). Interpreting Emai orthographic strategies. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 153–168). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Lundquis, Eric. (1992). On the relations between learning to spell and learning to read. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 179–192). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Smith, Philip T. (1996). Research methods in the psychology of reading. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 932–942). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Tsesmeli, Styliani N., & Seymour, Philip H. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 587–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9011-4
    • Underwood, Geoffrey, & Underwood, Jean. (1986). Cognitive processes in reading and spelling. In Asher Cashdan (Ed.), Literacy: Teaching and learning language skills (pp. 32–60). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Varnhagen, Connie K., McCallum, Michelle, & Burstow, Meridith. (1997). Is children's spelling naturally stage-like? [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 451–481. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007903330463
    • Yamada, Jun. (1995). Asymmetries between reading and writing for Japanese children. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 215–230). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Frith, Uta. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). Hove; Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by118
    • Aaron, P. G., Joshi, R. M., Ayotollah, Mahboobeh, Ellsberry, Annie, Henderson, Janet, & Lindsey, Kim. (1999). Decoding and sight-word naming: Are they independent components of word recognition skill? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(2), 89–127.
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, & Taha, Haitham. (2004). Reading and spelling error analysis of native Arabic dyslexic readers [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 651–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2657-x
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, & Taha, Haitham. (2006b). Reading in Arabic orthography: Characteristics, research findings, and assessment. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron, (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 321–338). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Akita, Kiyomi, & Hatano, Giyoo. (1999). Learning to read and write in Japanese. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 214–234). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Alcock, Katie, & Ngorosho, Damaris. (2007). Learning to spell and learning phonology: The spelling of consonant clusters in Kiswahili. Reading and Writing, 20(7), 643–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9043-9
    • Allyn, Frances A., & Burt, Jennifer S. (1998). Pinch my wig or winch my pig: Spelling, spoonerisms and other language skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 51–74.
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A., Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Khateb, Asaid. (2017). What contributes to spelling in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218748
    • Bernstein, Stuart E. (2009). Phonology, decoding, and lexical compensation in vowel spelling errors made by children with dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9116-z
    • Bertelson, Paul, Chen, Hsuan-Chih, & de Gelder, Béatrice. (1997). Explicit speech analysis and orthographic experience in Chinese readers. In Hsuan-Chih Chen, (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 27–46). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Blair, Rebecca, & Savage, Robert. (2006). Name writing but not environmental print recognition is related to letter-sound knowledge and phonological awareness in pre-readers. Reading and Writing, 19(9), 991–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9027-9
    • Bosse, Marie-Line, Valdois, Sylviane, & Tainturier, Marie-Josèphe. (2003). Analogy without priming in early spelling development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(7), 693–716.
    • Both-de Vries, Anna C., & Bus, Adriana G. (2010a). It's all in the name. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 3–15). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_1
    • Boudreau, Donna. (2002). Literacy skills in children and adolescents with Down syndrome [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 497–525.
    • Bourke, Lorna, & Adams, Anne-Marie. (2010). Cognitive constraints and the early learning goals in writing [Special Issue:Writing development: Cognitive, sociocultural, linguistic perspectives, edited b Debra Myhill & Ros Fisher]. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01434.x
    • Bråten, Ivar, Lie, Alfred, Andreassen, Rune, & Olaussen, Bodil S. (1999). Leisure time reading and orthographic processes in word recognition among Norwegian third- and fourth-grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(1), 65–88.
    • Bredel, Ursula, Müller, Astrid, & Hinney, Gabriele. (2010). Einleitung. In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller, & Gabriele Hinney (Eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch - didaktisch - empirisch [Writing system and writing acquisition: Linguistic, didactic, empirical]. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 289) (pp. 1–7). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Cardoso-Martins, Claudia. (2006). Beginning reading acquisition in Brazilian Portuguese. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 171–187). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, Resenda, Selmara Mamede, & Rodrigues, Larissa Assunção. (2002). Letter name knowledge and the ability to learn to read by processing letter–phoneme relations in words: Evidence from Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 409–432.
    • Carver, Ronald P. (1998). Predicting reading level in grades 1 to 6 from listening level and decoding level: Testing theory relevant to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 121–154.
    • Cassar, Marie, Treiman, Rebecca, Moats, Louisa, Pollo Tatiana Cury, & Kessler, Brett. (2005). How do the spellings of children with dyslexia compare with those of nondyslexic children? Reading and Writing, 18(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2345-x
    • Castles, Anne, & Nation, Kate. (2006). How does orthographic learning happen? In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From ink marks to ideas: Challenges and controversies about word recognition and reading (pp. 151–179). Hove; New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203841211
    • Connelly, Vincent, Johnston, Rhona, & Thompson, G. Brian. (2001). The effect of phonics instruction on the reading comprehension of beginning readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 423–457.
    • Cook, Vivian. (2004). The English writing system. (The English Language series). London Hodder Arnold. [2014, reprinted, London: New York: Routledge]
    • Cook, Vivian. (2016). Background to the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 5–23). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Dahlgren Sandberg, Annika. (1998). Reading and spelling among nonvocal children with cerebral palsy: Influence of home and school literacy environment. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 23–50.
    • Dahlgren Sandberg, Annika, & Hjelmquist, Erland. (1997). Language and literacy in nonvocal children with cerebral palsy. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 107–133.
    • Danielsson, Kristina. (2001). Beginning readers' sensitivity to different linguistic levels: An error and correction analysis at the lexical, syntactic, and semantic levels. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 395–421.
    • Davies, Robert A. I., & Cuetos, Fernando. (2010). Reading acquisition and dyslexia in Spanish. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 155–180). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • de Abreu, Mônica Dourado, & Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia. (1998). Alphabetic access route in beginning reading acquisition in Portuguese: The role of letter-name knowledge. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 85–104.
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, & Dhooge, Sarah. (2010). Developmental stability and changes in the impact of root consistency on children's spelling. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1055–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9195-5
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, & Sparks, Erin. (2015). Children's spelling development: Theories and evidence. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 311–325). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Deavers, Rachael P., & Brown, Gordon D. A. (1997). Rules versus analogies in children's spelling: Evidence for task dependence [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 339–361.
    • Defior, Sylvia, & Serrano, Francisca. (2005). The initial development of spelling in Spanish: From global to analytical. Reading and Writing, 18(1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5893-1
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Duncan, Lynne G., & Johnson, Rhona S. (1999). How does phonological awareness relate to nonword reading skill amongst poor readers? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 405–439.
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (1992b). Review and commentary: Stages of spelling development. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 307–332). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Ellis, Nick C., Miwa, Natsume, Stavropoulou, Katerina, Hoxhallari, Lorenc, Van Daal, Victor H.P., Polyzoe, Nicoletta, Tsipa, Maria-Louisa, & Petalas, Michalis. (2004). The effects of orthographic depth on learning to read alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic scripts. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 438–468. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.4.5
    • Eme, Elsa, & Golder, Caroline. (2005). Word-reading and word-spelling styles of French beginners: Do all children learn to read and spell in the same way? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 157–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-6409-8
    • Floyd, Randy G., Bergeron, Renee, & Alfonso, Vincent C. (2006). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive ability profiles of poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 19(5), 427–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9002-5
    • Frost, Jørgen. (2001a). Phonemic awareness, spontaneous writing, and reading and spelling development from a preventive perspective. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 487–513.
    • Frost, Jørgen. (2001b). Differences in reading development among Danish beginning-readers with high versus low phonemic awareness on entering grade one. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 615–642.
    • Goetz, Kristina, Hulme, Charles, Brigstocke, Sophie, Carroll, Julia M., Nasir, Louise, & Snowling, M. (2008). Training reading and phoneme awareness skills in children with Down syndrome [Special issue: Recent developments in reading intervention research, edited by William E. Tunmer]. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9089-3
    • Goswami, Usha. (2006). Orthography, phonology, and reading development: A cross-linguistics perspective. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 463–480). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Günther, Klaus-B. (1986). Entwicklungs- und sprachpsychologische Begründung der Notwendigkeit spezifischer Methoden für den Erwerb der Schriftsprache bei sprachentwicklungsgestörten, lernbehinderten und hörgeschädigten Kindern [On the necessity of specific methods for teaching written language to language-developmental-disturbed, learning-disabled, and hearing-impaired children - Arguments from developmental psychology and psycholinguistics]. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 354–382). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Hagiliassis, Nick, Pratt, Chris, & Johnston, Michael. (2006). Orthographic and phonological processes in reading. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4123-9
    • Hanley, J. Richard, Tzeng, Ovid, & Huang, H.-S. (1999). Learning to read Chinese. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 173–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Harris, Margaret, & Hatano, Giyoo. (1999). Introduction: a cross-linguistic perspective on learning to read and write. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 1–9). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ho, Connie Suk-Han, Law, Teresa Pui-Sze, & Ng, Penny Man. (2000). The phonological deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008040922662
    • Holmes, Virginia M., & Babauta, Mariko L. (2005). Single or dual representations for reading and spelling? [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 257–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-8129-5
    • Holmes, Virginia M., & Malone, N. (2004). Adult spelling strategies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 537–566.
    • Holopainen, Leena, Ahonen, Timo, Tolvanen, Asko, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2000). Two alternative ways to model the relation between reading accuracy and phonological awareness at preschool age. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 77–100.
    • Jaffré, Jean-Pierre, & Fayol, Michel. (2006). Orthography and literacy in French. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 81–103). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Jiménez, Juan E., García, Eduardo, Naranjo, Francisco, de León, Sara C., & Hernández-Cabrera, Juan A. (2020). An analysis and comparison of three theoretical models of the reading-writing relationships in Spanish-speaking children. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 35–53). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_3
    • Job, Remo, Peressotti, Francesca, & Mulatti, Claudio. (2006). The acquisition of literacy in Italian. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 105–119). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Karanth, Prathibha. (2006). The Kagunita of Kannada - Learning to read and write an Indian alphasyllabary. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 389–404). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Kay, Janice. (1996). Psychological aspects of spelling. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1074–1094). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Kemp, Nenagh. (2016). Children's first language acquisition of the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 191–204). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Khateb, Asaid, Taha, Haitham Y., Elias, Inas, & Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2013). The effect of the internal orthographic connectivity of written Arabic words on the process of the visual recognition: A comparison between skilled and dyslexic readers [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.834244
    • Laws, Glynis, & Gunn, Deborah. (2002). Relationships between reading, phonological skills and language development in individuals with Down syndrome: A five year follow-up study [Special issue: edited by Margaret J. Snowling & Jean-Emile Gombert]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(5/6), 527–548.
    • Lehtonen, Annukka. (2006). Sources of information children use in learning to spell: The case of Finnish geminates. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 63–79). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Luelsdorff, Philip A., & Chesnokov, Sergei V. (1994). Determinacy analysis and constrastive orthography. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 183–213). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Mayer, Peter, Crowley, Kevin, & Kaminska, Zofia. (2007). Reading and spelling processes in Welsh–English bilinguals: Differential effects of concurrent vocalisation tasks. Reading and Writing, 20(7), 671–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9044-8
    • McGuinness, Diane. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Meyler, Ann, & Breznitz, Zvia. (1998). Developmental associations between verbal and visual short-term memory and the acquisition of decoding skill. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(6), 519–540.
    • Mohamed, Wessam, Elbert, Thomas, & Landerl, Karin. (2011). The development of reading and spelling abilities in the first 3 years of learning Arabic [Special issue: Literacy acquisition in Arabic, edited by Abdessatar Mahfoudhi, John Everatt & Gad Elbeheri]. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 1043–1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9249-8
    • Mohamed, Wessam, Landerl, Karin, & Elbert, Thomas. (2014). An epidemiological survey of specific reading and spelling disabilities in Arabic speaking children in Egypt. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 99–117). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Nation, Kate. (1997). Children's sensitivity to rime unit frequency when spelling words and nonwords [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007938810898
    • Nation, Kate, & Castles, Anne. (2017). Putting the learning into orthographic learning. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 147–168). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Nunes, Terezinha, Bryant, Peter, & Bindman, Miriam. (1997a). Learning to spell regular and irregular verbs [Special issue: Spelling, edited by Rebecca Treiman]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(5/6), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007951213624
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Orsolini, Margherita, Fanari, Rachele, Cerracchio, Sara, & Famiglietti, Luisa. (2009). Phonological and lexical reading in Italian children with dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 933–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9134-x
    • Patel, Purushottam G. (1995). Brahmi scripts, Orthographic units and reading acquisition. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 265–275). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Pattison, Helen. (1986). Orthographic skills in the hearing-impaired. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 341–353). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Pennington, Bruce F., Cardoso-Martins, Cláudia, Green, Phyllis A., & Lefly, Dianne L. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 707–755.
    • Pietras, Izabela, & Łockiewicz, Marta. (2020). The development of reading and spelling in Polish: A semi-transparent orthography. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 203–222). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_13
    • Pollo, Tatiana Cury, Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2008). Three perspectives on spelling development. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 175–189). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Porpodas, Costas D. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Greek: Research review of the role of phonological and cognitive factors. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 189–199). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Prakash, P., & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (1995). Orthography and reading in Kannada: A Dravidian language. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 95–108). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Rahbari, Noriyeh, Sénéchal, Monique, & Arab-Moghaddam, Narges. (2007). The role of orthographic and phonological processing skills in the reading and spelling of monolingual Persian children. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9042-x
    • Rego, Lucia Lins Browne. (1999). Phonological awareness, syntactic awareness and learning to read and spell in Brazilian Portuguese. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 51–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Rickard Liow, Susan. (1999). Reading skill development in bilingual Singaporean children. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 196–213). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Rickard Liow, Susan J., & Lee, Lay Choo. (2004). Metalinguistic awareness and semi-syllabic scripts: Children's spelling errors in Malay [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 7–26.
    • Roncoli, Silvia, & Masterson, Jackie. (2016). ‘Unexpected’ spelling difficulty in a 10-year-old child with good reading skills: An intervention case study. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1159539
    • Rupley, William H., Rodriquez, Maximo, Mergen, Sandra L., Willson, Victor L., & Nichols, William Dee. (2000). Effects of structural features on word recognition development of hispanic and non-hispanic second graders. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 337–347.
    • Savage, Robert, & Stuart, Morag. (2001). Orthographic analogies and early reading: Explorations of performance and variation in two transfer tasks. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 571–598.
    • Scheerer-Neumann, Gerheid. (1996a). Der Erwerb der basalen Lese- und Schreibfertigkeiten [The acquisition of basic reading and writing skills]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1153–1169). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Scheerer-Neumann, Gerheid. (1996b). Störungen des Erwerbs der Schriftlichkeit bei alphabetischen Schriftsystemen [Disorders in written language acquisition]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1329–1351). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Schiff, Rachel. (2003). The effects of morphology and word length on the reading of Hebrew nominals. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 263–287.
    • Seidenberg, M. S. (1992a). Beyond orthographic depth: Equitable division of labor. In R. Frost & K. Katz (Eds.), Orthography; phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 85–118). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    • Sénéchal, Monique, Ouellette, Gene, Pagan, Stephanie, & Lever, Rosemary. (2012). The role of invented spelling on learning to read in low-phoneme awareness kindergartners: A randomized-control-trial study. Reading and Writing, 25(4), 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9310-2
    • Seymour, Philip H. K. (2006). Theoretical framework for beginning reading in different orthographies. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 441–462). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Seymour, Philip H. K. (2008). Continuity and discontinuity in the development of single-word reading: Theoretical speculations. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 1–24). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Share, David L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(752). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
    • Share, David L. (2020). Extricating reading science from entrenched anglocentricism, eurocentricism, and alphabetism and embracing global diversity: A personal journey. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 4(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.28987/ijrld.4.2.3
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sproat, Richard, & Gutkin, Alexander. (2021). The taxonomy of writing systems: How to measure how logographic a system is. Computational Linguistics, 47(3), 477–528. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00409
    • Sprugevica, Ieva, & Høien, Torleiv. (2003). Enabling skills in early reading acquisition: A study of children in Latvian kindergartens. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 159–177.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Sucena, Ana, Castro, São Luís, & Seymour, Philip. (2009). Developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth: The case of European Portuguese [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9156-4
    • Taha, Haitham, & Khateeb, Hala. (2018). Statistical learning and orthographic preferences among native Arab kindergarten and first graders. Writing Systems Research, 10(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2018.1473313
    • Tiwari, Shivani, Nair, Remya, & Krishnan, Gopee. (2011). A preliminary investigation of akshara knowledge in the Malayalam alphasyllabary: Extension of Nag's (2007) study. Writing Systems Research, 3(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr013
    • Treiman, Rebecca. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Treiman, Rebecca. (2006). Knowledge about letters as a foundation for reading and spelling. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 581–599). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Tsesmeli, Styliani N., & Seymour, Philip H. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 587–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9011-4
    • Van Berkel, Ans. (2005). The role of the phonological strategy in learning to spell in English as a second language. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (97–121). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Vellutino, Frank. (1992). Afterword. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 353–357). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Walker, Joanne, & Hauerwas, Laura Boynton. (2006). Development of phonological, morphological, and orthographic knowledge in young spellers: The case of inflected verbs. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 819–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9006-1
    • Wimmer, Heinz, Landerl, Karin, & Frith, Uta. (1999). Learning to read German: normal and impaired acquisition. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 34–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Winskel, Heather, & Iemwanthong, Kanyarat. (2010). Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1021–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9194-6
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Yang, Hui, & Peng, Dan-ling. (1997). The learning and naming of Chinese characters of elementary school children. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 323–346). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Yassin, Rana, Share, David L., & Shalhoub-Awwad, Yasmin. (2020). Learning to spell in Arabic: The impact of script-specific visual-orthographic features. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:2059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02059
    • Yin, Wengang, & Butterworth, Brian. (1992). Deep and surface dyslexia in Chinese. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 349–366). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
  • Frith, U. (1986a). A developmental framework for developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 36, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648022 Cited by10
    • Andrews, Sally. (2012). Individual differences in skilled visual word recognition and reading. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 151–172). London: Psychology Press.
    • Andrews, Sally. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Andrews, Sally, & Bond, Rachel. (2009). Lexical expertise and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down processing of lexical ambiguity [Special issue: Lexical representations in reading and writing, edited by Joanne Arciuli]. Reading and Writing, 22(6), 687–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9137-7
    • Bastien-Toniazzo, Mireille, & Jullien, Sandrine. (2001). Nature and importance of the logographic phase in learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1/2), 119–143.
    • Cao, Fan. (2018). Brain mechanisms of Chinese word reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 137–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Groth, Katarina, Lachmann, Thomas, Riecker, Axel, Muthmann, Irene, & Steinbrink, Claudia. (2011). Developmental dyslexics show deficits in the processing of temporal auditory information in German vowel length discrimination. Reading and Writing, 24(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9213-7
    • Kroese, Judith M., Hynd, George W., Knight, Deborah F., Hiemenz, Jennifer R., & Hall, Josh. (2000). Clinical appraisal of spelling ability and its relationship to phonemic awareness (blending, segmenting, elision, and reversal), phonological memory, and reading in reading disabled, ADHD, and normal children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 105–131.
    • Miller, Paul. (2004a). The importance of vowel diacritics for reading in Hebrew: What can be learned from readers with prelingual deafness? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 593–615.
    • Mohamed, Wessam, Landerl, Karin, & Elbert, Thomas. (2014). An epidemiological survey of specific reading and spelling disabilities in Arabic speaking children in Egypt. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 99–117). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Sun-Alperin, M. Kendra, & Wang, Min. (2011). Cross-language transfer of phonological and orthographic processing skills from Spanish L1 to English L2. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9221-7
  • Frith, Uta. (1986b). Psychologische Aspekte des orthographischen Wissens: Entwicklung und Entwicklungsstörung [Psychological aspects of orthographic skills : Development and disorder]. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 218–233). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter. Cited by6
    • Dehn, Mechthild, & Sjölin, Amelie. (1996). Frühes Lesen und Schreiben [Early reading and writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1141–1153). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Fichtner, Bernd. (1986). Wie lernen Kinder lesen und schreiben? - Aspekte einer pädagogischen Fragestellung [How do children learn to read and to write? - Aspects of a pedagogical problem]. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 444–462). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Friedrich, Bodo. (1996). Aspekte und Probleme des Schreibunterrichts: Rechtschreiben [Aspects and problems of the teaching of writing: Spelling]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1249–1260). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Hinney, Gabriele. (2010). Wortschreibungskompetenz und sprachbewusster Unterricht. Eine Alternativkonzeption zur herkömmlichen Sicht auf den Schriftspracherwerb. In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller, & Gabriele Hinney (Eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch - didaktisch - empirisch [Writing system and writing acquisition: Linguistic, didactic, empirical]. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 289) (pp. 47–100). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Knobloch, Clemens. (1996). Historisch-systematischer Aufriß der psychologischen Schreibforschung [Historical outline of psychological research on writing]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 983–992). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Meyler, Ann, & Breznitz, Zvia. (1998). Developmental associations between verbal and visual short-term memory and the acquisition of decoding skill. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(6), 519–540.
  • Frith, U. (1997). Brain, mind and behaviour in dyslexia. In C. Hulme & M. Snowling (Eds.), Dyslexia: Biology, cognition and intervention (pp. 1–19). London: Whurr. Cited by7
    • Frost, Jørgen. (2001b). Differences in reading development among Danish beginning-readers with high versus low phonemic awareness on entering grade one. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 615–642.
    • Miller-Guron, Louise, & Lundberg, Ingvar. (2000). Dyslexia and second language reading: A second bite at the apple? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 41–61.
    • Savage, Robert. (2004). Motor skills, automaticity and developmental dyslexia: A review of the research literature. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(3), 301–324.
    • Seymour, Philip H. K. (2008). Continuity and discontinuity in the development of single-word reading: Theoretical speculations. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 1–24). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Valdois, Sylviane, Bosse, Marie-Line, Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., Zorman, Michel, David, D., & Pellat, Jacques. (2003). Phonological and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from two case studies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(6), 541–572.
    • Wolff, Ulrika. (2010). Subgrouping of readers based on performance measures: A latent profile analysis. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9160-8
  • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press. Cited by23
    • Alcock, Katherine J., & Ngorosho, Damaris. (2003). Learning to spell a regularly spelled language is not a trivial task - Patterns of errors in Kiswahili. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(7), 635–666.
    • Bhatt, Prath M. (1988). Graphic systems, phonic systems, and linguistic representations. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 106–120). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Bus, A. G., & Out, D. (2009). Unraveling genetic and environmental components of early literacy: A twin study. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9115-0
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Fischer, Steven Roger. (2001). A history of writing. London: Reaktion Books.
    • Günther, Klaus-B. (1986). Entwicklungs- und sprachpsychologische Begründung der Notwendigkeit spezifischer Methoden für den Erwerb der Schriftsprache bei sprachentwicklungsgestörten, lernbehinderten und hörgeschädigten Kindern [On the necessity of specific methods for teaching written language to language-developmental-disturbed, learning-disabled, and hearing-impaired children - Arguments from developmental psychology and psycholinguistics]. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 354–382). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Hatta, T., Kawakami, A., & Tamaoka, K. (1998). Writing errors in Japanese kanji: A study with Japanese students and foreign learners of Japanese [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 457–470. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 303–316). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Henderson, Edmund H. (1992). The interface of lexical competence and knowledge of written words. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 1–30). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Hong, Su Chin, & Chen, Shu Hui. (2011). Roles of position, stress, and proficiency in L2 children's spelling: A developmental perspective. Reading and Writing, 24(3), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9216-4
    • Iwahara, Akihiko, Hatta, Takeshi, & Maehara, Aiko. (2003). The effects of a sense of compatibility between type of script and word in written Japanese. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 377–397.
    • Kay, Janice. (1996). Psychological aspects of spelling. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1074–1094). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • McBride, Catherine. (2017). Early literacy across languages. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 55–74). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Nag, Sonali, & Snowling, Margaret J. (2011a). Cognitive profiles of poor readers of Kannada [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9258-7
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Raynolds, Laura B., & Uhry, Joanna K. (2010). The invented spellings of non-Spanish phonemes by Spanish–English bilingual and English monolingual kindergarteners. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9169-7
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [1987, Reprinted with corrections; 2015, Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing]
    • Scheerer-Neumann, Gerheid. (1996b). Störungen des Erwerbs der Schriftlichkeit bei alphabetischen Schriftsystemen [Disorders in written language acquisition]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1329–1351). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Smith, Philip T. (1996). Research methods in the psychology of reading. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 932–942). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Treiman, Rebecca. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Watt, W. C. (1994a). Foreword. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. vii-xiii). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Frith, Uta, & Frith, Christopher. (1980). Relationships between reading and spelling. In J. B. Kavanagh & R. L. Venezky (Eds.), Orthography, reading and dyslexia (pp. 287–295). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press. Cited by7
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Frith, Uta. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). Hove; Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Frith, Uta (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. London: Hutchinson; Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [1987, Reprinted with corrections; 2015, Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing]
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
    • Yule, Valerie, & Ishi, Yasuko. (2016). Spelling reform. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 413–427). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Frith, U., & Snowling, M. (1983). Reading for meaning and reading for sound in autistic and dyslexic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 329–342. Cited by9
    • Cain, Kate, Oakhill, Jane, & Bryant, Peter. (2000a). Investigating the causes of reading comprehension failure: The comprehension-age match design. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008058319399
    • Duncan, Lynne G., & Johnson, Rhona S. (1999). How does phonological awareness relate to nonword reading skill amongst poor readers? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5/6), 405–439.
    • Frith, Uta. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). Hove; Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2010). Role of orthography in literacy acquisition and literacy problems among monolinguals and bilinguals. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 167–176). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_12
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sparks, Richard L. (2001). Phonemic awareness and reading skill in hyperlexic children: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 333–360.
    • Sparks, Richard L. (2004). Orthographic awareness, phonemic awareness, syntactic processing, and working memory skill in hyperlexic children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(4), 359–386.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Frith, Uta, Wimmer, Heinz, & Landerl, Karin. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German- and English-speaking children. Scientific Study of Reading, 2(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0201_2 Cited by42
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Brunswick, Nicola. (2010). Unimpaired reading development and dyslexia across different languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 131–154). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Cholewa, Jürgen, Mantey, Stefanie, Heber, Stefanie, & Hollweg, Wibke. (2010). Developmental surface and phonological dysgraphia in German 3rd graders. Reading and Writing, 23(1), 97–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9153-7
    • Dich, Nadya. (2010). Development of sensitivity to phonological context in learning to spell in English: Evidence from Russian ESL speakers. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.04dic
    • Goswami, Usha. (2006). Orthography, phonology, and reading development: A cross-linguistics perspective. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 463–480). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2009). The basic processes in reading: Insights from neuroscience. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 134–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2010). A psycholinguistic grain size view of reading acquisition across languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 23–42). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Kerek, Eugenia, & Niemi, Pekka. (2012). Grain-size units of phonological awareness among Russian first graders. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1), 80–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.05ker
    • Ktori, Maria, & Pitchford, Nicola J. (2010). Letter position encoding across deep and transparent orthographies. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 69–85). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Landerl, Karin. (2006). Reading acquisition in different orthographies: Evidence from direct comparisons. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 513–530). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Landerl, Karin. (2017). Learning to read German. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 299–322). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Landerl, Karin. (2019). Behavioral precursors of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.011
    • Mann, Virginia, & Wimmer, Heinz. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7/8), 653–682.
    • Miller-Guron, Louise, & Lundberg, Ingvar. (2000). Dyslexia and second language reading: A second bite at the apple? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 41–61.
    • Müller, Kurt, & Brady, Susan. (2001). Correlates of early reading performance in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 757–799.
    • Noack, Christina. (2009). Can secondary pupils train decoding skills?: An empirical study on phonological reading errors. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.05noa
    • Noack, Christina. (2010). Orthographie als Leserinstruktion: Die Leistung schriftsprachlicher Strukturen für den Dekodierprozess. In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller, & Gabriele Hinney (Eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch - didaktisch - empirisch [Writing system and writing acquisition: Linguistic, didactic, empirical]. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 289) (pp. 151–170). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Papadopoulos, Timothy C., Georgiou, George K., & Apostolou, Theodosia. (2020). The role of distal and proximal cognitive processes in literacy skills in Greek. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 171–184). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_11
    • Paulesu, Eraldo, Brunswick, Nicola, & Paganelli, Federica. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in unimpaired and dyslexic reading: Behavioural and functional anatomical observations in readers of regular and irregular orthographies. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 249–271). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Perfetti, Charles, & Harris, Lindsay. (2017). Learning to read English. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 347–370). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Perfetti, Charles, & Harris, Lindsay. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in English. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 25–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.002
    • Piper, Benjamin, & van Ginkel, Agatha J. (2017). Reading the script: How the scripts and writing systems of Ethiopian languages relate to letter and word identification. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 36–59, https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1220354
    • Post, Yolanda V., & Carreker, Suzanne. (2002). Orthographic similarity and phonological transparency in spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 317–340.
    • Rahbari, Noriyeh, Sénéchal, Monique, & Arab-Moghaddam, Narges. (2007). The role of orthographic and phonological processing skills in the reading and spelling of monolingual Persian children. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9042-x
    • Schmalz, Xenia, Marinus, Eva, Coltheart, Max, & Castles, Anne. (2015). Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1614–1629. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0835-2
    • Schwartz, Mila, Geva, Esther, Share, David L., & Leikin, Mark. (2007). Learning to read in English as third language: The cross-linguistic transfer of phonological processing skills. Written Language & Literacy, 10(1), 25–52.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Leikin, Mark, & Share, David L. (2005). Bi-literate bilingualism versus mono-literate bilingualism: A longitudinal study of reading acquisition in Hebrew (L2) among Russian-speaking (L1) children [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 179–206.
    • Seymour, Philip H. K. (2006). Theoretical framework for beginning reading in different orthographies. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 441–462). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Seymour, Philip H. K. (2008). Continuity and discontinuity in the development of single-word reading: Theoretical speculations. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 1–24). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane, & Béchennec, Danielle. (2004). Variability and invariance in learning alphabetic orthographies: From linguistic description to psycholinguistic processing [Special issue: Process and acquisition of written language, edited by Robert Schreuder & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(1), 9–33.
    • Stavans, Anat. (2015). Monolingual and multilingual discrimination of written sequences' readability. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.898574
    • Taha, Haitham. (2016). Deep and shallow in Arabic orthography: New evidence from reading performance of elementary school native Arab readers. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1114910
    • Tong, Xiuli, & McBride-Chang, Catherine. (2010). Chinese-English biscriptal reading: Cognitive component skills across orthographies [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9211-9
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, & Perfetti, Charles. (2017). Introduction: Operating principles in learning to read. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Wesseling, Ralph, & Reitsma, Pieter. (2000). The transient role of explicit phonological recoding for reading acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3/4), 313–336.
    • Wimmer, Heinz, Landerl, Karin, & Frith, Uta. (1999). Learning to read German: normal and impaired acquisition. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 34–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Winskel, Heather, & Iemwanthong, Kanyarat. (2010). Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1021–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9194-6
    • Wolff, Ulrika. (2010). Subgrouping of readers based on performance measures: A latent profile analysis. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9160-8
    • Zaretsky, Elena, Kraljevic, Jelena Kuvac, Core, Cynthia, & Lencek, Mirjana. (2009). Literacy predictors and early reading and spelling skills as a factor of orthography: Cross-linguistic evidence. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 52–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.03zar
  • Fritzsche, Joachim. (1996). Der außerschulische Erwerb der Schriftlichkeit [The acquisition of literacy outside of school]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1318–1329). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Frost, Jørgen. (2001a). Phonemic awareness, spontaneous writing, and reading and spelling development from a preventive perspective. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 487–513. Cited by2
    • Both-de Vries, Anna C., & Bus, Adriana G. (2010a). It's all in the name. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 3–15). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_1
    • Moats, Louisa, Foorman, Barbara, & Taylor, Patrick. (2006). How quality of writing instruction impacts high-risk fourth graders' writing. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 363–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4944-6
  • Frost, Jørgen. (2001b). Differences in reading development among Danish beginning-readers with high versus low phonemic awareness on entering grade one. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 615–642. Cited by2
    • Frost, Jørgen. (2001a). Phonemic awareness, spontaneous writing, and reading and spelling development from a preventive perspective. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 487–513.
    • Sprugevica, Ieva, & Høien, Torleiv. (2003). Enabling skills in early reading acquisition: A study of children in Latvian kindergartens. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 159–177.
  • Frost, Ram. (1992). Orthography and phonology: The psychological reality of orthographic depth. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 255–274). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Cited by11
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1996a). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Habib, Sandy, & Kurzon, Dennis. (2008). The systematization and typology of the instant messaging writing system used by young Israeli Arabs. Written Language & Literacy, 11(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.1.04hab
    • Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. (2000). Sejong's theory of literacy and writing [Special issue: Literacy and writing systems in Asia, edited by Chin w. Kim, Elmer H., Antonsen, William Bright, & Braj B. Kachru]. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), 30, 13–45.
    • Llaurado, Anna, & Tolchinsky, Liliana. (2016). The developmental pattern of spelling in Catalan from first to fifth school grade. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.1000812
    • Ravid, Dorit. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: Phonological and morphological factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011192806656
    • Ravid, Dorit. (2006a). Hebrew orthography and literacy. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Ravid, Dorit Diskin. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling (Literacy Studies 3). New York: Springer.
    • Ravid, Dorit, & Haimowitz, Sarit. (2006). The vowel path: Learning about vowel representation in written Hebrew [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 67–93.
    • Share, David L. & Daniels, Peter T. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
    • Treiman, Rebecca. (2006). Knowledge about letters as a foundation for reading and spelling. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 581–599). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Frost, R. (1994). Prelexical and postlexical strategies in reading: Evidence from a deep and a shallow orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(1), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.1.116 Cited by18
    • Akamatsu, Nobuhiko. (2005). Effects of second language reading proficiency and first language orthography on second language word recognition. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 238–259). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Akamatsu, Nobuhiko. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Japanese-English bilinguals. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron, (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 481–496). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Breznitz, Zvia, Oren, Revital, & Shaul, Shelley. (2004). Brain activity of regular and dyslexic readers while reading Hebrew as compared to English sentences [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 707–737.
    • Brunswick, Nicola. (2010). Unimpaired reading development and dyslexia across different languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 131–154). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Fendel, Victoria. (2021). A small step for a man, a giant leap for a aeople—The Coptic language. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 775–786). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-fend
    • Frost, Ram, & Bentin, Shlomo. (1992b). Reading consonants and guessing vowels: Visual word recognition in Hebrew orthography. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 27–44). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Hansen, Gunna Funder. (2014). Word recognition in Arabic: Approaching a language-specific reading model. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 55–76). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Katz, Leonard, & Frost, Ram. (1992b). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62789-2
    • Katzir, Tami, Shaul, Shelly, Bretnitz, Zvia, & Wolf, Maryanne. (2004). The universal and the unique in dyslexia: A cross-linguistic investigation of reading and reading fluency in Hebrew-and English-speaking children with reading disorders [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 739–768.
    • Knuijt, Paul P. N. A., & Assink, Egbert M. H. (1997). Morphographic units in Dutch polysyllabic words: In search of the body of the BOSS. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_1
    • Matsumoto, Mallory E. (2017). From sound to symbol: Orthographic semantization in Maya hieroglyphic writing. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1335634
    • Miller, Paul. (2004a). The importance of vowel diacritics for reading in Hebrew: What can be learned from readers with prelingual deafness? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 593–615.
    • Mimran, R. Cohen. (2006). Reading disabilities among Hebrew-speaking children in upper elementary grades: The role of phonological and nonphonological language skills. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5461-3
    • Rao, Chaitra, Vaid, Jyotsna, Srinivasan, Narayanan, & Chen, Hsin-Chin. (2011). Orthographic characteristics speed Hindi word naming but slow Urdu naming: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu biliterates [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9256-9
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2003a). Bilingual oral reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of Arabic/Hebrew (L1) - English (L2) readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(8), 717–736.
    • Schmalz, Xenia, Marinus, Eva, Coltheart, Max, & Castles, Anne. (2015). Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1614–1629. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0835-2
    • Shimron, Joseph. (1999). The role of vowel signs in Hebrew: Beyond word recognition [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008045316692
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
  • Frost, R. (1995). Phonological computation and missing vowels: Mapping lexical involvement in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 398–408. Cited by10
    • Leong, Che Kan, & Tamaoka, Katsuo. (1998). Cognitive processing of Chinese characters, words, sentences and Japanese kanji and kana: An introduction [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 155–164. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers].
    • Miller, Paul. (2004a). The importance of vowel diacritics for reading in Hebrew: What can be learned from readers with prelingual deafness? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 593–615.
    • Ravid, Dorit. (2006a). Hebrew orthography and literacy. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Ravid, Dorit, & Schiff, Rachel. (2006). Roots and patterns in Hebrew language development: Evidence from written morphological analogies. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 789–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9004-3
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2003a). Bilingual oral reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of Arabic/Hebrew (L1) - English (L2) readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(8), 717–736.
    • Schiff, Rachel. (2003). The effects of morphology and word length on the reading of Hebrew nominals. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 263–287.
    • Schiff, Rachel, & Ravid, Dorit. (2004b). Vowel representation in written Hebrew: Phonological, orthographic and morphological contexts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(3), 241–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000017668.48386.90
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
  • Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123(1), 71–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.1.71 Cited by46
    • Álvarez, Carlos J., Carreiras, Manuel, & Perea, Manuel. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000242 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 98–123). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A. (2017). Reading Arabic with the diacritics for short vowels: Vowelised but not necessarily easy to read. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1400493
    • Ashby, Jane. (2016). Why does prosody accompany fluency? Re-conceptualizing the role of phonology in reading. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 65–89). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_5
    • Ashby, Jane, & Rayner, Keith. (2004). Representing syllable information during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 391–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000233 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 65–97). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Bedoin, Nathalie, & dos Santos, Christophe. (2008). How do consonant feature values affect the processing of a CVCV structure? Evidence from a reading task [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.05bed
    • Berent, Iris, & Van Orden, Guy C. (2000). Homophone dominance modulates the phonemic-masking effect. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 133–167.
    • Beyermann, Sandra. (2013). Orthographic cues to word stress in German: Word endings and number of final consonant letters. Written Language & Literacy, 16(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.1.02bey
    • Bijeljac-Babic, Ranka, Millogo, Victor, Farioli, Fernand, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). A developmental investigation of word length effects in reading using a new on-line word identification paradigm. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(4), 411–431.
    • Binder, Katherine, & Borecki, Caren. (2008). The use of phonological, orthographic, and contextual information during reading: A comparison of adults who are learning to read and skilled adult readers. Reading and Writing, 21(8), 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9099-1
    • Carreiras, Manuel, Armstrong, Blair C., Perea, Manuel, & Frost, Ram. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005
    • Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). Sublexical representations and the ‘front end’ of visual word recognition [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000288 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 1–10). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Chetail, Fabienne, & Mathey, Stéphanie. (2009). The syllable frequency effect in visual recognition of French words: A study in skilled and beginning readers. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 955–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9135-9
    • Cheung, Him, McBride-Chang, Catherine, & Chow, Bonnie Wing-Yin. (2006). Reading Chinese. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 421–438). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Clifton, Charles, Jr. (2015). The roles of phonology in silent reading: A selective review. In Lyn Frazier & Edward Gibson (Eds.), Explicit and implicit prosody in sentence processing: Studies in honor of Janet Dean Fodor (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 46) (pp. 161–176). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3–319-12961-7_9
    • Cunningham, Anne E., Perry, Kathryn E., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011100226798
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Frost, Stephen J., Sandak, Rebecca, Mencl, W. Einar, Landi, Nicole, Moore, Dina, Della Porta, Gina, Rueckl, Jay G., Katz, Leonard, & Pugh, Kenneth R. (2008). Neurobiological and behavioral studies of skilled and impaired word reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 355–376). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Gutiérrez-Palma, Nicolás, & Palma-Reyes, Alfonso. (2008). On the use of lexical stress in reading Spanish. Reading and Writing, 21(6), 645–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9082-x
    • Halderman, Laura K., Ashby, Jane, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2012). Phonology: An early and integral role in identifying words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 207–228). London: Psychology Press.
    • Hoosain, Rumjahn. (2002). Speed of getting at the phonology and meaning of Chinese words. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 130-142). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Jasińska, Kaja K., Frost, Stephen, Molfese, Peter, Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, Rueckl, Jay, & Pugh, Ken. (2016). Neuroimaging perspectives on skilled and impaired reading and the bilingual experience. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_3
    • Jeong, Junghye, Katz, Leonard, & Lee, Yang. (2018). The two-dimensional orthography of phonology and morphology in differentiating Korean and Chinese. Writing Systems Research, 10(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2018.1519482
    • Katz, Leonard, & Frost, Stephen J. (2001). Phonology constrains the internal orthographic representation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 297–332.
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Singh, Anisha. (2018). Introduction to script processing in Chinese and cognitive consequences for bilingual reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 25–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Mann, Virginia A. (2000). Introduction to special issue on morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 143–147.
    • Miller, Paul. (2004a). The importance of vowel diacritics for reading in Hebrew: What can be learned from readers with prelingual deafness? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 593–615.
    • Miller, Paul. (2004b). The word decoding strategies of Hebrew readers with and without hearing impairments: Some insight from an associative learning task [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 823–845.
    • Mody, Maria. (2003). Phonological basis in reading disability: A review and analysis of the evidence [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 21–39.
    • Nazir, Tatjana A., & Huckauf, Anke. (2008). The visual skill “reading”. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 25–42). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Penke, Martina. (2008). Introduction: The role of phonology in reading [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.01pen
    • Penke, Martina, & Schrader, Kathrin. (2008). The role of phonology in visual word recognition: Reading acquisition vs. skilled reading [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.04pen
    • Perfetti, Charles A., Liu, Ying, & Tan, Li-Tan. (2002). How the mind can meet the brain in reading: A comparative writing systems approach. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 35–60). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2019). EPS mid-career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819829696
    • Schiff, Rachel. (2003). The effects of morphology and word length on the reading of Hebrew nominals. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 263–287.
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Taft, Marcus. (2006). A localist-cum-distributed (LCD) framework for lexical processing. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 76–94). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Taft, Marcus, Xu, Joe, & Li, Sonny. (2017). Letter coding in visual word recognition: The impact of embedded words. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.05.002
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Balota, David A. (2015). Visual word recognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 26–43). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1999b). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837.
  • Frost, Ram. (2005). Orthographic systems and skilled word recognition processes in reading. In Margaret J. Snowling & Charles Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology) (pp. 272–295). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch15 Cited by17
    • Bar-Kochva, Irit, Khateb, Asaid, & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2016). Introduction. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 1–7). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_1
    • Brunswick, Nicola. (2010). Unimpaired reading development and dyslexia across different languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 131–154). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Kahn-Horwitz, Janina, Kuash, Sara, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Schwartz, Mila. (2014). How do previously acquired languages affect acquisition of English as a foreign language: The case of Circassian [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.03kah
    • Leikin, Mark, Schwartz, Mila, & Share, David L. (2010). General and specific benefits of bi-literate bilingualism: A Russian–Hebrew study of beginning literacy [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9210-x
    • Levin, Iris, Aram, Dorit, Tolchinsky, Liliana, & McBride, Catherine. (2013). Maternal mediation of writing and children's early spelling and reading: The Semitic abjad versus the European alphabet [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.797335
    • McClung, Nicola A., O'Donnell, Colleen R., & Cunningham, Anne E. (2012). Orthographic learning and the development of visual word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 173–195). London: Psychology Press.
    • McClung, Nicola A., & Pearson, P. David. (2019). Reading comprehension across languages: Seven European orthographies and two international literacy assessments. Written Language & Literacy, 22(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00019.mcc
    • McDougall, Siné, Brunswick, Nicola, & de Mornay Davies, Paul. (2010). Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies: An introduction and overview. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 3–21). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Geva, Esther, Share, David L., & Leikin, Mark. (2007). Learning to read in English as third language: The cross-linguistic transfer of phonological processing skills. Written Language & Literacy, 10(1), 25–52.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Leikin, Mark, & Share, David L. (2005). Bi-literate bilingualism versus mono-literate bilingualism: A longitudinal study of reading acquisition in Hebrew (L2) among Russian-speaking (L1) children [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 179–206.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Share, David L., Leikin, Mark, & Kozminsky, Ely. (2008). On the benefits of bi-literacy: Just a head start in reading or specific orthographic insights? Reading and Writing, 21(9), 905–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9097-3
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Share, David L. (2020). Extricating reading science from entrenched anglocentricism, eurocentricism, and alphabetism and embracing global diversity: A personal journey. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 4(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.28987/ijrld.4.2.3
    • Share, David L. & Daniels, Peter T. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
    • Taha, Haitham. (2016). Deep and shallow in Arabic orthography: New evidence from reading performance of elementary school native Arab readers. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1114910
    • Tahan, Sandy, Cline, Tony, & Messaoud-Galusi, Souhila. (2011). The relationship between language dominance and pre-reading skills in young bilingual children in Egypt [Special issue: Literacy acquisition in Arabic, edited by Abdessatar Mahfoudhi, John Everatt & Gad Elbeheri]. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 1061–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9301-3
  • Frost, R. (2006). Becoming literate in Hebrew: The grain-size hypothesis and Semitic orthographic systems. Developmental Science, 9, 439–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00523.x Cited by7
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A., Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Khateb, Asaid. (2017). What contributes to spelling in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218748
    • Farran, Lama K., Bingham, Gary E., & Matthews, Mona W. (2014). Environmental contributions to language and literacy outcomes in bilingual English-Arabic children in the U.S. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 351–379). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Hansen, Gunna Funder. (2014). Word recognition in Arabic: Approaching a language-specific reading model. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 55–76). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2013). A tale of one letter: Morphological processing in early Arabic spelling. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.857586
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, & Henkin-Roitfarbm Roni. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Winskel, Heather, & Iemwanthong, Kanyarat. (2010). Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1021–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9194-6
  • Frost, R. (2012a). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11001841 Cited by35
    • Andrews, Sally. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A. (2017). Reading Arabic with the diacritics for short vowels: Vowelised but not necessarily easy to read. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1400493
    • Burani, Cristina, Thornton, Anna M., & and Zoccolotti, Pierluigi. (2017). Learning to read Italian. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 211–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Carlisle, Joanne F., & Kearns, Devin M. (2017). Learning to read morphologically complex words. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 191–214). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Carreiras, Manuel, Armstrong, Blair C., Perea, Manuel, & Frost, Ram. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005
    • Chang, Li-Yun, Chen, Yen-Chi, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2018). GraphCom: A multidimensional measure of graphic complexity applied to 131 written languages. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0881-y
    • Chang, Li-Yun, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2018). Visual factors in writing system variation: Measurement and implications for reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 49–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Goldwasser, Orly. (2015). The invention of the alphabet: On “lost papyri” and the Egyptian “alphabet”. In Christophe Rico & Claudia Attucci (Eds.), Origins of the alphabet: Proceedings of the First Polis Institute Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 124–141). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    • Jared, Debra. (2015). Literacy and literacy development in bilinguals. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 165–182). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Jasińska, Kaja K., Frost, Stephen, Molfese, Peter, Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, Rueckl, Jay, & Pugh, Ken. (2016). Neuroimaging perspectives on skilled and impaired reading and the bilingual experience. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_3
    • Kinoshita, Sachiko. (2015). Visual word recognition in the Bayesian reader framework. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 63–75). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Koda, Keiko, & Miller, Ryan T. (2018). Cross-linguistic interactions in L2 word meaning inference in English as a foreign language. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 293–312). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • McClung, Nicola A., & Pearson, P. David. (2019). Reading comprehension across languages: Seven European orthographies and two international literacy assessments. Written Language & Literacy, 22(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00019.mcc
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Nag, Sonali. (2014a). Akshara-phonology mappings: The common yet uncommon case of the consonant cluster [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855621
    • Nag, Sonali. (2014b). Alphabetism and the science of reading: From the perspective of the akshara languages [General commentary article]. Frontiers in Psycholology, 5:866. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00866
    • Perfetti, Charles, Pugh, Kenneth, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2019). Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems: The big picture. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 441–461). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.020
    • Perfetti, Charles, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2017). Epilogue: Universals and particulars in learning to read across seventeen orthographies. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 455–466). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2019). EPS mid-career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819829696
    • Rimzhim, Anurag, Katz, Leonard, & Fowler, Carol A. (2014). Brāhmī-derived orthographies are typologically Āksharik but functionally predominantly alphabetic [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855618
    • Sadeghi, Amir, Everatt, John, & McNeill, Brigid. (2016). A simple model of Persian reading. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.1003768
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2013). A tale of one letter: Morphological processing in early Arabic spelling. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.857586
    • Schmalz, Xenia, Marinus, Eva, Coltheart, Max, & Castles, Anne. (2015). Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1614–1629. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0835-2
    • Share, David L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(752). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
    • Share, David L. (2017). Learning to read Hebrew. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 155–180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Share, David L. & Daniels, Peter T. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
    • Shuai, Lan, Frost, Stephen J., Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Neurocognitive markers of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 277–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.013
    • Smolka, Eva, Preller, Katrin H., & Eulitz, Carsten. (2014). ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
    • Stenson, Nancy, & Hickey, Tina M. (2016). When regular is not easy: Cracking the code of Irish orthography. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1177481
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, & Perfetti, Charles. (2017). Introduction: Operating principles in learning to read. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Perfetti, Charles, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Introduction: Developmental dyslexia – A cross-linguistic perspective. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.001
    • Winskel, Heather, & Perea, Manuel. (2014). Can parafoveal-on-foveal effects be obtained when reading an unspaced alphasyllabic script (Thai)? [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.843440
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2016). Processing the written word. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 453–469). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Frost, R. (2012). A universal approach to modeling visual word recognition and reading: Not only possible, but also inevitable. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 310–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000635 Cited by5
    • Carreiras, Manuel, Armstrong, Blair C., Perea, Manuel, & Frost, Ram. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Mirza, Amna, & Gottardo, Alexandra. (2019). Learning to read in their heritage language: Hindi-English speaking children reading two different orthographies. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 329–351). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_17
    • Overmann, Karenleigh A. (2016). Beyond writing: The development of literacy in the ancient Near East. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000019
    • Zevin, Jason D. (2019). Modeling developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 372–390). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.017
  • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Frost, R., Ahissar, M., Gotesman, R., & Tayeb, S. (2003). Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(2), 346–378. Cited by5
    • Álvarez, Carlos J., Carreiras, Manuel, & Perea, Manuel. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000242 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 98–123). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). Sublexical representations and the ‘front end’ of visual word recognition [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000288 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 1–10). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Massaro, Dominic W., & Jesse, Alexandra. (2005). The magic of reading: Too many influences for quick and easy explanations. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 37–61). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1992a). Processing phonological and semantic ambiguity: Evidence from semantic priming at different SOAs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(1), 58–68. Cited by10
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim. (1997b). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(1), 65–78.
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim. (1998). Reading Arabic texts: Effects of text type, reader type and vowelization. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007906222227
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim. (2001). The role of vowels in reading Semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1/2), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008147606320
    • Carello, Claudia, & Turvey, M. T., Lukatela, Georgije. (1992). Can theories of word recognition remain stubbornly nonphonological? In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 211–226). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Frost, Ram, & Bentin, Shlomo. (1992b). Reading consonants and guessing vowels: Visual word recognition in Hebrew orthography. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 27–44). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Hansen, Gunna Funder. (2014). Word recognition in Arabic: Approaching a language-specific reading model. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 55–76). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2006). Morpho-Phonemic similarity within and between languages: A factor to be considered in processing Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9009-y
    • Koda, Keiko. (2009). Learning to read in new writing systems. In Michael H. Long & Catherine J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching. Blackwell Publishing.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2003a). Bilingual oral reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of Arabic/Hebrew (L1) - English (L2) readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(8), 717–736.
    • Share, David L., Shany, Michal, & Lipka, Orly. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Hebrew. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 152–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.008
  • Frost, Ram, & Bentin, Shlomo. (1992b). Reading consonants and guessing vowels: Visual word recognition in Hebrew orthography. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 27–44). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. Cited by15
    • Akamatsu, Nobuhiko. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Japanese-English bilinguals. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron, (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 481–496). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Eviatar, Zohar, & Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2004). Morphological and orthographic effects on hemispheric processing of nonwords: A cross-linguistic comparison [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2659-8
    • Geva, Esther. (1995). Orthographic and cognitive processing in learning to read English and Hebrew. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 277–291). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Geva, Esther, Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Shany, Michal. (1997). Development of reading efficiency in first and second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_2
    • Hansen, Gunna Funder. (2014). Word recognition in Arabic: Approaching a language-specific reading model. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 55–76). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Kahn-Horwitz, Janina, Shimron, Joseph, & Sparks, Richard L. (2005). Predicting foreign language reading achievement in elementary school students. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 527–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3179-x
    • Ravid, Dorit, & Haimowitz, Sarit. (2006). The vowel path: Learning about vowel representation in written Hebrew [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 67–93.
    • Roberts, David, Boyd, Ginger, Merz, Johannes, & Vydrin, Valentin. (2020). Quantifying written ambiguities in tone languages: A comparative study of Elip, Mbelime and Eastern Dan. Language Documentation and Conservation, 14, 108-138. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24915
    • Schiff, Rachel. (2003). The effects of morphology and word length on the reading of Hebrew nominals. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 263–287.
    • Schiff, Rachel, & Ravid, Dorit. (2004b). Vowel representation in written Hebrew: Phonological, orthographic and morphological contexts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(3), 241–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000017668.48386.90
    • Schmalz, Xenia, Marinus, Eva, Coltheart, Max, & Castles, Anne. (2015). Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1614–1629. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0835-2
    • Share, David, & Levin, Iris. (1999). Learning to read and write in Hebrew. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 89–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Share, David L., & Shalev, Carmit. (2004). Self-teaching in normal and disabled readers [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 769–800.
    • Taouk, Miriam, & Coltheart, Max. (2004). The cognitive processes involved in learning to read in Arabic [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000013831.91795.ec
    • Wade-Woolley, Lesly, & Geva, Esther. (1999). Processing inflected morphology in second language word recognition: Russian-speakers and English-speakers read Hebrew [Special issue: Linguistic processes in reading across orthographies, edited by Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(4), 321–343.
  • Frost, R., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2000). Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 751–765. Cited by5
    • Dichy, Joseph. (2017). The analytics of writing, exemplified by Arabic, the youngest of the Semitic scripts. In Manuel Sartori, Manuela E. B. Giolfo, & Philippe Cassuto (Eds), Approaches to the history and dialectology of Arabic in honor of Pierre Larcher (Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics 88) (pp. 29–56). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Basnight-Brown, Dana M. (2008). The role of morphology in visual word recognition: Graded semantic influences due to competing senses and semantic richness of the stem. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 85–106). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Ravid, Dorit, & Schiff, Rachel. (2006). Roots and patterns in Hebrew language development: Evidence from written morphological analogies. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 789–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9004-3
    • Schiff, Rachel, Raveh, Michal, & Kahta, Shani. (2008). The developing mental lexicon: Evidence from morphological priming of irregular Hebrew forms. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9088-4
  • Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 829–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.829 Cited by20
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim, & Taha, Haitham. (2004). Reading and spelling error analysis of native Arabic dyslexic readers [Special issue: Regular and impaired reading in semitic languages, edited by Zvia Breznitz]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(7/8), 651–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2657-x
    • Boudelaa, Sami. (2014). Is the Arabic mental lexicon morpheme-based or stem-based? Implications for spoken and written word recognition. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 31–54). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Dichy, Joseph. (2017). The analytics of writing, exemplified by Arabic, the youngest of the Semitic scripts. In Manuel Sartori, Manuela E. B. Giolfo, & Philippe Cassuto (Eds), Approaches to the history and dialectology of Arabic in honor of Pierre Larcher (Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics 88) (pp. 29–56). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Hansen, Gunna Funder. (2014). Word recognition in Arabic: Approaching a language-specific reading model. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 55–76). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2006). Morpho-Phonemic similarity within and between languages: A factor to be considered in processing Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9009-y
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Ko, In Yeong. (2018). The time course of activation of semantic and orthographic information in morphological decomposition by Korean adults and developing readers. Frontiers in Communication, 3:51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00051
    • Mimran, R. Cohen. (2006). Reading disabilities among Hebrew-speaking children in upper elementary grades: The role of phonological and nonphonological language skills. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5461-3
    • Rao, Chaitra, Vaid, Jyotsna, Srinivasan, Narayanan, & Chen, Hsin-Chin. (2011). Orthographic characteristics speed Hindi word naming but slow Urdu naming: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu biliterates [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9256-9
    • Ravid, Dorit. (2006a). Hebrew orthography and literacy. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Ravid, Dorit Diskin. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling (Literacy Studies 3). New York: Springer.
    • Ravid, Dorit, & Bar-On, Amalia. (2005). Manipulating written Hebrew roots across development: The interface of semantic, phonological and orthographic factors [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-1802-5
    • Ravid, Dorit, & Schiff, Rachel. (2006). Roots and patterns in Hebrew language development: Evidence from written morphological analogies. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 789–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9004-3
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, Esther. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
    • Schiff, Rachel. (2003). The effects of morphology and word length on the reading of Hebrew nominals. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 263–287.
    • Schiff, Rachel, Raveh, Michal, & Kahta, Shani. (2008). The developing mental lexicon: Evidence from morphological priming of irregular Hebrew forms. Reading and Writing, 21(7), 719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9088-4
    • Schiff, Rachel, & Ravid, Dorit. (2004b). Vowel representation in written Hebrew: Phonological, orthographic and morphological contexts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(3), 241–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000017668.48386.90
    • Share, David L., Shany, Michal, & Lipka, Orly. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Hebrew. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 152–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.008
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Frost, R., & Katz, L. (1989). Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 17(3), 302–310. Cited by8
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Frost, Ram. (1992). Orthography and phonology: The psychological reality of orthographic depth. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 255–274). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Frost, Ram, & Bentin, Shlomo. (1992b). Reading consonants and guessing vowels: Visual word recognition in Hebrew orthography. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 27–44). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Hung, Yueh-Nu. (2012b). Similarities and dissimilarities in reading Chinese and English: Goodman's reading model perspective. In Ken Goodman, Shaomei Wang, Mieko Shimizu Iventosch, & Yetta Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 32–44). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Katz, Leonard, & Feldman, Laurie B. (1996). The influence of an alphabetic writing system on the reading process. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1094–1101). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Katz, Leonard, & Frost, Ram. (1992b). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62789-2
    • Lervåg, Arne, & Bråten, Ivar. (2002). Effects of memory load on word recognition: Are there dual-routers in Norway? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 233–259.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Frost, Ram, & Katz, Leonard (Eds.). (1992). Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. Cited by16
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A., Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Khateb, Asaid. (2017). What contributes to spelling in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218748
    • Assink, Egbert M. H., Vooijs, Caroline, & Knuijt, Paul P. N. A. (2000). Prefixes as access units in visual word recognition: A comparison of Italian and Dutch data [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 149–168.
    • Bird, Steven. (1999a). Strategies for representing tone in African writing systems. Written Language & Literacy, 2(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.02bir
    • Bird, Steven. (2001). Orthography and identity in Cameroon. Written Language & Literacy, 4(2), 131–162. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.4.2.02bir [Reprinted in SIL Notes on Literacy, 26(1-2), 3–44]
    • Cossu, Giuseppe. (1999b). Biological constraints on literacy acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 213–237.
    • Danielsson, Kristina. (2001). Beginning readers' sensitivity to different linguistic levels: An error and correction analysis at the lexical, syntactic, and semantic levels. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(5/6), 395–421.
    • Katz, Leonard, & Feldman, Laurie B. (1996). The influence of an alphabetic writing system on the reading process. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1094–1101). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Leong, Che Kan. (2000b). Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words and grades 4, 5 and 6 children's spelling [Special issue: Morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems, edited by Virginia A. Mann]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 277–302.
    • Leong, Che-Kan. (2002c). Segmental analysis and reading in Chinese. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 227–245). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Leong, Che Kan, & Tamaoka, Katsuo. (1998). Cognitive processing of Chinese characters, words, sentences and Japanese kanji and kana: An introduction [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 155–164. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers].
    • McDougall, Siné, Brunswick, Nicola, & de Mornay Davies, Paul. (2010). Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies: An introduction and overview. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 3–21). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Öney, Banu, Peter, Mira, & Katz, Leonard. (1997). Phonological processing in printed word recognition: Effects of age and writing system. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0101_4
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Tenny, Carol. (2016). A linguist looks at AAC: Language representation systems for augmentative and alternative communication, compared with writing systems and natural language. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 84–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.959459
    • Young-Scholten, Martha. (2015). Introduction: Who are adolescents and adults who develop literacy for the first time in an L2, and why are they of research interest? [Special issue: Adolescents and adults who develop literacy for the first time in L2, edited by Martha Young-Scholten]. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.998443
  • Frost, Ram, Katz, Leonard, & Bentin, Shlomo. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.104 Cited by88
    • Abdelhadi, Souad, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Eviatar, Zohar. (2011). Perceptual load in the reading of Arabic: Effects of orthographic visual complexity on detection. Writing Systems Research, 3(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr014
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim. (1997b). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(1), 65–78.
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim. (1998). Reading Arabic texts: Effects of text type, reader type and vowelization. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007906222227
    • Abu-Rabia, Salim. (2001). The role of vowels in reading Semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1/2), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008147606320
    • Ahmed, Yusra, Wagner, Richard K., & Kantor, Patricia Thatcher. (2012). How visual word recognition is affected by developmental dyslexia. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 196–215). London: Psychology Press.
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A. (2017). Reading Arabic with the diacritics for short vowels: Vowelised but not necessarily easy to read. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1400493
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., Hutchinson, Keith A., & Cortese, Michael J. (2012). Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 90–115). London: Psychology Press.
    • Baluch, Bahman. (2006). Perian orthography and its relation to literacy. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 365–376). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Barca, Laura, Bello, Arianna, Volterra, Virginia, & Burani, Cristina. (2010). Lexical-semantic reading in a shallow orthography: Evidence from a girl with Williams Syndrome. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9192-8
    • Besner, Derek, & Smith, Marilyn Chapnik. (1992). Basic processes in reading: Is the orthographic depth hypothesis sinking? In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 45–66). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Beyermann, Sandra. (2013). Orthographic cues to word stress in German: Word endings and number of final consonant letters. Written Language & Literacy, 16(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.1.02bey
    • Bird, Steven. (2001). Orthography and identity in Cameroon. Written Language & Literacy, 4(2), 131–162. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.4.2.02bir [Reprinted in SIL Notes on Literacy, 26(1-2), 3–44]
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Hellwig, Frauke M., & de Groot, Annette M. B. (2004). Word-initial entropy in five languages: Letter to sound, and sound to letter. [Special issue: From letter to sound, edited by Martin Neef & Beatrice Primus]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(2), 165–184.
    • Buchanan, Lori, & Besner, Derek. (1993). Reading aloud: Evidence for the use of whole word nonsemantic pathway. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 133–152. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 5–24). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Caravolas, Marketa. (2006). Learning to spell in different languages: How orthographic variables might affect early literacy. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 497–511). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Carello, Claudia, & Turvey, M. T., Lukatela, Georgije. (1992). Can theories of word recognition remain stubbornly nonphonological? In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 211–226). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Colombo, Lucia, & Tabossi, Patrizia. (1992). Strategies and stress assignment: Evidence from a shallow orthography. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 319–340). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Cook, Vivian, & Bassetti, Benedetta. (2005). An introduction to researching second language writing systems. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 1–67). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Duncan, Lynne G., Castro, São Luís, Defior, Sylvia, Seymour, Philip H. K., Baillie, Sheila, Leybaert, Jacqueline, Mousty, Philippe, Genard, Nathalie, Sarris, Menelaos, Porpodas, Costas D., Lund, Rannveig, Sigurðsson, Baldur, Þráinsdóttir, Anna S., Sucena, Ana, & Serrano, Francisca. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009
    • Eme, Elsa, & Golder, Caroline. (2005). Word-reading and word-spelling styles of French beginners: Do all children learn to read and spell in the same way? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 157–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-6409-8
    • Frost, Ram. (1992). Orthography and phonology: The psychological reality of orthographic depth. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (Typological Studies in Language 21) (pp. 255–274). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Frost, Ram, & Bentin, Shlomo. (1992b). Reading consonants and guessing vowels: Visual word recognition in Hebrew orthography. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 27–44). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Georgiou, George K, Torppa, Minna, Manolitsis, George, Lyytinen, Heikki, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of reading and spelling across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9271-x
    • Geva, Esther, & Siegel, Linda S. (2000). Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in two languages. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1/2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008017710115
    • Gijsel, Martine A. R., van Bon, Wim H. J., & Bosman, Anna M. T. (2004). Assessing reading skills by means of paper-and-pencil lexical decision: Issues of reliability, repetition, and word-pseudoword ratio. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(5), 517–536.
    • Hansen, Gunna Funder. (2014). Word recognition in Arabic: Approaching a language-specific reading model. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 55–76). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Hino, Yasushi, Lupker, Stephen J., Sears, Chris R., & Ogawa, Taeko. (1998). The effects of polysemy for Japanese katakana words [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 395–424. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 241–270). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Hue, Chih-Wei. (1992). Recognition processes in character naming. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 93–107). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Jasińska, Kaja K., Frost, Stephen, Molfese, Peter, Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, Rueckl, Jay, & Pugh, Ken. (2016). Neuroimaging perspectives on skilled and impaired reading and the bilingual experience. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_3
    • Jeong, Junghye, Katz, Leonard, & Lee, Yang. (2018). The two-dimensional orthography of phonology and morphology in differentiating Korean and Chinese. Writing Systems Research, 10(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2018.1519482
    • Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2010). Role of orthography in literacy acquisition and literacy problems among monolinguals and bilinguals. In Dorit Aram & Ofra Korat (Eds.), Literacy development and enhancement across orthographies and cultures (Literacy Studies 2) (pp. 167–176). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_12
    • Joyce, Terry, & Crellin, Robert. (2019). Introduction. Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?) [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00024.joy
    • Katz, Leonard, & Feldman, Laurie B. (1996). The influence of an alphabetic writing system on the reading process. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1094–1101). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Katz, Leonard, & Frost, Ram. (1992b). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62789-2
    • Katz, Leonard, & Frost, Stephen J. (2001). Phonology constrains the internal orthographic representation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3/4), 297–332.
    • Kinoshita, Sachiko. (1998). The role of phonology in reading Japanese: Or why I don't hear myself when reading Japanese [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 439–455. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 285–301). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Koda, Keiko. (2013). Second language reading, scripts, and orthographies. In Carol A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1053
    • Koda, Keiko, & Miller, Ryan T. (2018). Cross-linguistic interactions in L2 word meaning inference in English as a foreign language. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 293–312). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Lefrançois, Pascale, & Armand, Françoise. (2003). The role of phonological and syntactic awareness in second-language reading: The case of Spanish-speaking learners of French. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 219–246.
    • Levin, Iris, Aram, Dorit, Tolchinsky, Liliana, & McBride, Catherine. (2013). Maternal mediation of writing and children's early spelling and reading: The Semitic abjad versus the European alphabet [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.797335
    • McClung, Nicola A., & Pearson, P. David. (2019). Reading comprehension across languages: Seven European orthographies and two international literacy assessments. Written Language & Literacy, 22(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00019.mcc
    • Meyler, Ann, & Breznitz, Zvia. (1998). Developmental associations between verbal and visual short-term memory and the acquisition of decoding skill. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(6), 519–540.
    • Müller, Kurt, & Brady, Susan. (2001). Correlates of early reading performance in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7/8), 757–799.
    • Myhill, John. (2014). The effect of diglossia on literacy in Arabic and other languages. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 197–223). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Nag, Sonali. (2014a). Akshara-phonology mappings: The common yet uncommon case of the consonant cluster [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855621
    • Nag, Sonali. (2017b). Learning to read Kannada and other languages of South Asia. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 104-126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Öney, Banu, Peter, Mira, & Katz, Leonard. (1997). Phonological processing in printed word recognition: Effects of age and writing system. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0101_4
    • Pae, Hye K., Bae, Sungbong, & Yi, Kwangoh. (2019). More than an alphabet: Linguistic features of Korean and their influences on Hangul word recognition [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00027.pae
    • Penke, Martina. (2008). Introduction: The role of phonology in reading [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.01pen
    • Penke, Martina, & Schrader, Kathrin. (2008). The role of phonology in visual word recognition: Reading acquisition vs. skilled reading [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.04pen
    • Perfetti, Charles A., Zhang, Sulan, & Berent, Iris. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a “universal” phonological principle. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62798-3
    • Presutti, Stefano. (2021b). Graphemic complexity for the new Romance phonemes in Italian. Some reflections. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 755–773). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-preb
    • Rahbari, Noriyeh, & Sénéchal, Monique. (2009). Lexical and nonlexical processes in the skilled reading and spelling of Persian. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9122-1
    • Rao, Chaitra, Vaid, Jyotsna, Srinivasan, Narayanan, & Chen, Hsin-Chin. (2011). Orthographic characteristics speed Hindi word naming but slow Urdu naming: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu biliterates [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9256-9
    • Reid, Agnieszka A. (2006). Developmental dyslexia: Evidence from Polish. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 249–274). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Russak, Susie, & Fragman, Alon. (2014). The development of grapho-phonemic representations among native Hebrew speakers learning Arabic as a foreign language. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 381–393). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2003a). Bilingual oral reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of Arabic/Hebrew (L1) - English (L2) readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(8), 717–736.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3180-4
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2013). A tale of one letter: Morphological processing in early Arabic spelling. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.857586
    • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, Esther. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
    • Sasaki, Miho. (2005). The effect of L1 reading processes on L2: A crosslinguistic comparison of Italian and Japanese users of English. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (289–308). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Schmalz, Xenia, Marinus, Eva, Coltheart, Max, & Castles, Anne. (2015). Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1614–1629. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0835-2
    • Scholfield, Phil, & Chwo, Gloria Shu-Mei. (2005). Are the L1 and L2 word reading processes affected more by writing system or instruction? In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 215–237). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Seidenberg, M. S. (1992a). Beyond orthographic depth: Equitable division of labor. In R. Frost & K. Katz (Eds.), Orthography; phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 85–118). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    • Shuai, Lan, Frost, Stephen J., Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Neurocognitive markers of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 277–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.013
    • Simpson, Greg B., & Kang, Hyewon. (2004). Syllable processing in alphabetic Korean [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000013808.65933.a1
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems (Studies in Natural Language Processing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Stenson, Nancy, & Hickey, Tina M. (2016). When regular is not easy: Cracking the code of Irish orthography. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1177481
    • Sucena, Ana, Castro, São Luís, & Seymour, Philip. (2009). Developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth: The case of European Portuguese [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9156-4
    • Taha, Haitham. (2016). Deep and shallow in Arabic orthography: New evidence from reading performance of elementary school native Arab readers. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1114910
    • Tahan, Sandy, Cline, Tony, & Messaoud-Galusi, Souhila. (2011). The relationship between language dominance and pre-reading skills in young bilingual children in Egypt [Special issue: Literacy acquisition in Arabic, edited by Abdessatar Mahfoudhi, John Everatt & Gad Elbeheri]. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 1061–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9301-3
    • Tammelin-Laine, Taina, & Martin, Maisa. (2015). The simultaneous development of receptive skills in an orthographically transparent second language. [Special issue: Adolescents and adults who develop literacy for the first time in L2, edited by Martha Young-Scholten]. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.943148
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, & Perfetti, Charles. (2017). Introduction: Operating principles in learning to read. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Perfetti, Charles, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Introduction: Developmental dyslexia – A cross-linguistic perspective. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.001
    • Wagner, Richard K., Piasta, Shayne B., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (2006). Learning to read. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 1111–1142). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Winskel, Heather. (2009). Reading in Thai: The case of misaligned vowels. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9100-z
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Wydell, Taeko N. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Japanese. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 176–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.009
    • Yamashita, Junko. (2018). Orthographic and phonological processing in L2-English word recognition: Longitudinal observations from Grade 9 to 11 in EFL learners in Japan. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 267–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2016). Processing the written word. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 453–469). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Zevin, Jason D. (2019). Modeling developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 372–390). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.017
    • Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, De Luca, Maria, Di Filippo, Gloria, Judica, Anna, & Martelli, Marialuisa. (2009). Reading development in an orthographically regular language: effects of length, frequency, lexicality and global processing ability. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1053–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9144-8
  • Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1293–1326. Cited by8
    • Boudelaa, Sami. (2014). Is the Arabic mental lexicon morpheme-based or stem-based? Implications for spoken and written word recognition. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 31–54). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, & Katherine. (2012). Morphological processing: A comparison of graded and categorical accounts. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–22). London: Psychology Press.
    • Frost, Ram. (2015). Cross-linguistic perspectives on letter-order processing: Empirical findings and theoretical considerations. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 88–98). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Hansen, Gunna Funder. (2014). Word recognition in Arabic: Approaching a language-specific reading model. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 55–76). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • McClung, Nicola A., & Pearson, P. David. (2019). Reading comprehension across languages: Seven European orthographies and two international literacy assessments. Written Language & Literacy, 22(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00019.mcc
    • Rao, Chaitra, Vaid, Jyotsna, Srinivasan, Narayanan, & Chen, Hsin-Chin. (2011). Orthographic characteristics speed Hindi word naming but slow Urdu naming: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu biliterates [Special issue: Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages, edited by Sonali Nag-Arulmani, Markéta Caravolas & Margaret J. Snowling]. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9256-9
    • Smolka, Eva, Preller, Katrin H., & Eulitz, Carsten. (2014). ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Frost, Stephen J., Sandak, Rebecca, Mencl, W. Einar, Landi, Nicole, Moore, Dina, Della Porta, Gina, Rueckl, Jay G., Katz, Leonard, & Pugh, Kenneth R. (2008). Neurobiological and behavioral studies of skilled and impaired word reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 355–376). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by2
    • Ehri, Linnea C. (2015). How children learn to read words. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 293–310). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Jasińska, Kaja K., Frost, Stephen, Molfese, Peter, Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, Rueckl, Jay, & Pugh, Ken. (2016). Neuroimaging perspectives on skilled and impaired reading and the bilingual experience. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_3
  • Fry, Edmund. (1799). Pantographia. London: Cooper and Wilson. Cited by5
    • Diringer, David. (1948). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind. London: Hutchinson; New York: Philosophical Library. [1953, Second revised edition; 1968, Third revised edition (2 volumes), London: Hutchinson; New York: Funk & Wagnalls; 1996, Reprinted, Munshiram Maniharlal Publishers]
    • Diringer, David. (1962). Writing (Ancient Peoples and Places 25). London: Thames & Hudson; New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
    • Drucker, Johanna. (1995). The alphabetic labyrinth: The letters in history and imagination. London: Thames & Hudson.
    • Firmage, R. A. (1993). The alphabet abecedarium: Some notes on letters. Boston, MA: David R. Godine. [2000, Reprinted, London: Bloomsbury]
    • Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. (1992). Before writing [Two volumes: Volume 1. From counting to cuneiform; Volume 2. A catalog of near eastern tokens]. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Fuchs, Douglas, Compton, Donald L., Fuchs, Lynn S., Bryant, Joan, & Davis, G. Nicole. (2008). Making “secondary intervention” work in a three-tier responsiveness-to-intervention model: findings from the first-grade longitudinal reading study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities [Special issue: Recent developments in reading intervention research, edited by William E. Tunmer]. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9083-9
  • Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N., Braun, M., & O'Connor, R. (2001). Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251–267. Cited by5
    • Al Otaiba, Stephanie, Lake, Vickie E., Greulich, Luana, Folsom, Jessica S. & Guidry, Lisa. (2012). Preparing beginning reading teachers: An experimental comparison of initial early literacy field experiences. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9250-2
    • Aram, Dorit. (2006). Early literacy interventions: The relative roles of storybook reading, alphabetic activities, and their combination. Reading and Writing, 19(5), 489–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9005-2
    • Foorman, Barbara R., Chen, Dung-Tsa, Carlson, Coleen, Moats, Louisa, Francis, David J., & Fletcher, Jack M. (2003). The necessity of the alphabetic principle to phonemic awareness instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 289–324.
    • Vadasy, Patricia F., & Sanders, Elizabeth A. (2008). Code-oriented instruction for kindergarten students at risk for reading difficulties: A replication and comparison of instructional groupings. Reading and Writing, 21(9), 929–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9119-9
    • Wagner, Richard K., Piasta, Shayne B., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (2006). Learning to read. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 1111–1142). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
  • Fuchs, Lynn S., Fuchs, Douglas, & Hamlett, Carol L. (2007). Using curriculum-based measurement to inform reading instruction. Reading and Writing, 20(6), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9051-4
  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3 Cited by21
    • Adlof, Suzanne M., Catts, Hugh W., & Little, Todd D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19(9), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z
    • Baker, Doris Luft, Park, Yonghan, & Baker, Scott K. (2012). The reading performance of English learners in grades 1-3: The role of initial status and growth on reading fluency in Spanish and English. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9261-z
    • Barth, Amy Elizabeth, Catts, Hugh W., & Anthony, Jason L. (2009). The component skills underlying reading fluency in adolescent readers: A latent variable analysis. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9125-y
    • Biancarosa, Gina. (2005). Speed and time, texts and sentences: Choosing the best metric for relating reading rate to comprehension [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 79–100.
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Crosson, Amy C., & Lesaux, Nonie K. (2010). Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers' text-reading fluency in English. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9168-8
    • Fuchs, Lynn S., Fuchs, Douglas, & Hamlett, Carol L. (2007). Using curriculum-based measurement to inform reading instruction. Reading and Writing, 20(6), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9051-4
    • Hudson, Roxanne F., Torgesen, Joseph K., Lane, Holly B., & Turner, Stephen J. (2012). Relations among reading skills and sub-skills and text-level reading proficiency in developing readers. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9283-6
    • Kershaw, Sarah, & Schatschneider, Chris. (2012). A latent variable approach to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 433–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9278-3
    • Lems, Kristin. (2012). The effect of L1 orthography on the oral reading of adult English language learners [Special issue: Second language writing systems, edited by Benedetta Bassetti, Jyotsna Vaid, & Vivian Cook]. Writing Systems Research, 4(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2011.635951
    • LeVasseur, Valerie Marciarille, Macaruso, Paul, & Shankweiler, Donald. (2008). Promoting gains in reading fluency: A comparison of three approaches. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9070-1
    • Lipka, Orly, Katzir, Tami, & Shaul, Shelley. (2016). The basis of reading fluency in first grade of Hebrew speaking children. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 91–104). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_6
    • Little, Callie W., Wang, Frances, & Hart, Sara A. (2016). Behavioral and molecular genetic influences on reading-related outcomes. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 14–32). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Nunes, Terezinha. (2016). Teaching literacy to English children: Policy and practice. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 205–221). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Roberts, David, & Walter, Stephen L. (Eds.). (2021). Tone orthography and literacy: The voice of evidence in ten Niger-Congo languages (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 18). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.18
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2003a). Bilingual oral reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of Arabic/Hebrew (L1) - English (L2) readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(8), 717–736.
    • Shany, Michal, & Biemiller, Andrew. (2010). Individual differences in reading comprehension gains from assisted reading practice: Pre existing conditions, vocabulary acquisition, and amounts of practice. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9196-4
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Spear-Swerling, Louise. (2006). Children's reading comprehension and oral reading fluency in easy text. Reading and Writing, 19(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4114-x
    • van den Broek, Paul, & Kendeou, Panayiota. (2017). Development of reading comprehension: Change and continuity in the ability to construct coherent representations. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 283–305). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Wexler, Jade, Vaughn, Sharon, Edmonds, Meaghan, & Reutebuch, Colleen Klein. (2008). A synthesis of fluency interventions for secondary struggling readers [Special issue: Recent developments in reading intervention research, edited by William E. Tunmer]. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 317–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9085-7
  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal measures of reading comprehension. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258800900206 Cited by8
    • Adlof, Suzanne M., Catts, Hugh W., & Little, Todd D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19(9), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z
    • Barth, Amy Elizabeth, Catts, Hugh W., & Anthony, Jason L. (2009). The component skills underlying reading fluency in adolescent readers: A latent variable analysis. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9125-y
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Crosson, Amy C., & Lesaux, Nonie K. (2010). Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers' text-reading fluency in English. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9168-8
    • Lems, Kristin. (2012). The effect of L1 orthography on the oral reading of adult English language learners [Special issue: Second language writing systems, edited by Benedetta Bassetti, Jyotsna Vaid, & Vivian Cook]. Writing Systems Research, 4(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2011.635951
    • Lipka, Orly, Katzir, Tami, & Shaul, Shelley. (2016). The basis of reading fluency in first grade of Hebrew speaking children. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 91–104). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_6
    • Roberts, David, & Walter, Stephen L. (Eds.). (2021). Tone orthography and literacy: The voice of evidence in ten Niger-Congo languages (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 18). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.18
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2003a). Bilingual oral reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of Arabic/Hebrew (L1) - English (L2) readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(8), 717–736.
  • Fuhrhop, Nanna. (2005). Orthografie [Orthography]. Heidelberg: Winter. [2006, Second edition; 2009, Third edition; 2015, Fourth edition] Cited by4
    • Blatt, Inge, Müller, Astrid, & Voss, Andreas. (2010). Schriftstruktur als Lesehilfe. Konzeption und Ergebnisse eines Hamburger Leseförderprojekts in Klasse 5 (HeLp). In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller, & Gabriele Hinney (Eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch - didaktisch - empirisch [Writing system and writing acquisition: Linguistic, didactic, empirical]. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 289) (pp. 171–202). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Evertz, Martin. (2018). Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441
    • Neef, Martin. (2012b). Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems. Writing Systems Research, 4(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.706658
    • Schmidt, Karsten. (2014). Morphophonographic regularities in German: The graphematic syllable boundary. A non-linear graphematic approach [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 253–281. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.04sch
  • Fuhrhop, Nanna. (2006). Orthografie [Orthography] (Second edition). Heidelberg: Winter. [2005, First edition; 2009, Third edition; 2015, Fourth edition] Cited by1
    • Noack, Christina. (2009). Can secondary pupils train decoding skills?: An empirical study on phonological reading errors. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.05noa
  • Fuhrhop, Nanna (2008). Das graphematische Wort (im Deutschen). Eine erste Annäherung. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 27, 189–228. https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFSW.2008.010 Cited by10
    • Böhm, Manuela, & Mehlem, Ulrich. (2020). What is a word? Word segmentation in multilingual writers writing French and Moroccan Arabic [Special issue: Literacies in contact, edited by Constanze Weth & Manuela Böhm, in collaboration Daniel Bunčić]. Written Language & Literacy, 23(2), 154–179. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00038.boh
    • Evertz, Martin. (2016). Minimal graphematic words in English and German: Lexical evidence for a theory of graphematic feet. Written Language & Literacy, 19(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.2.03eve
    • Evertz, Martin. (2018). Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441
    • Evertz-Rittich, Martin. (2021). What is a written word? And if so, how many? In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 25–45). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-ever
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Neef, Martin. (2012a). Boundaries in written representations: The potential beginning of words in German [Special issue: Units of language – units of writing, edited by Terry Joyce & David Roberts]. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.2.05nee
    • Primus, Beatrice. (2010). Strukturelle Grundlagen des deutschen Schriftsystems. In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller & Gabriele Hinney (Eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch - didaktisch - empirisch [Writing system and writing acquisition: Linguistic, didactic, empirical]. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 289) (pp. 9–45). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter; .Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110232257.9
    • Schmidt, Karsten. (2014). Morphophonographic regularities in German: The graphematic syllable boundary. A non-linear graphematic approach [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 253–281. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.04sch
    • Schroeder, Christoph. (2020). The advanced acquisition of orthography in heritage Turkish in Germany [Special issue: Literacies in contact, edited by Constanze Weth & Manuela Böhm, in collaboration Daniel Bunčić]. Written Language & Literacy, 23(2), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00043.sch
    • Symanczyk Joppe, Vilma. (2018). Optimal spaces and hyphens: A constraint-based analysis of compound word formation [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00011.sym
  • Fuhrhop, Nanna. (2009). Orthografie [Orthography] (Third edition). Heidelberg: Winter. [2005, First edition; 2006, Second edition; 2015, Fourth edition] Cited by5
    • Appelt, Annalen, Balestra, Miriam, & Neef, Martin. (2015). Orthographic constraints on the spelling of German a-sounds. Written Language & Literacy, 18(1), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.07app
    • Kirchhoff, Frank, & Primus, Beatrice. (2016). Punctuation. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 93–109). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Noack, Christina. (2010). Orthographie als Leserinstruktion: Die Leistung schriftsprachlicher Strukturen für den Dekodierprozess. In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller, & Gabriele Hinney (Eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch - didaktisch - empirisch [Writing system and writing acquisition: Linguistic, didactic, empirical]. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 289) (pp. 151–170). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Primus, Beatrice. (2010). Strukturelle Grundlagen des deutschen Schriftsystems. In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller & Gabriele Hinney (Eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch - didaktisch - empirisch [Writing system and writing acquisition: Linguistic, didactic, empirical]. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 289) (pp. 9–45). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter; .Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110232257.9
    • Schmidt, Karsten. (2014). Morphophonographic regularities in German: The graphematic syllable boundary. A non-linear graphematic approach [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 253–281. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.04sch
  • Fuhrhop, Nanna. (2010). Getrennt- und Zusammenschreibung: Kern und Peripherie. Rechtschreibdidaktische Konsequenzen aus dieser Unterscheidung. In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller, & Gabriele Hinney (Eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch - didaktisch - empirisch [Writing system and writing acquisition: Linguistic, didactic, empirical]. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 289) (pp. 235–257). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter. Cited by1
    • Primus, Beatrice. (2010). Strukturelle Grundlagen des deutschen Schriftsystems. In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller & Gabriele Hinney (Eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch - didaktisch - empirisch [Writing system and writing acquisition: Linguistic, didactic, empirical]. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 289) (pp. 9–45). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter; .Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110232257.9
  • Fuhrhop, Nanna. (2015). Orthografie [Orthography] (Fourth edition). Heidelberg: Winter. [2005, First edition; 2006, Second edition; 2009, Third edition] Cited by2
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Symanczyk Joppe, Vilma. (2018). Optimal spaces and hyphens: A constraint-based analysis of compound word formation [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00011.sym
  • Fuhrhop, N., & Buchmann, F. (2009). Die Längenhierarchie: Zum Bau der graphematischen Silbe [The length hierarchy: On the structure of the graphematic syllable]. Linguistische Berichte, 218, 127–155. Cited by7
    • Condorelli, Marco (Ed.). (2020). Advances in historical orthography, c. 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674171
    • Evertz, Martin. (2018). Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441
    • Fuhrhop, Nanna, Buchmann, Franziska, & Berg, Kristian. (2011). The length hierarchy and the graphematic syllable: Evidence from German and English. Written Language & Literacy, 14(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.05fuh
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2018). What is natural in writing? Prolegomena to a Natural Grapholinguistics [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00010.mel
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Primus, Beatrice. (2010). Strukturelle Grundlagen des deutschen Schriftsystems. In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller & Gabriele Hinney (Eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch - didaktisch - empirisch [Writing system and writing acquisition: Linguistic, didactic, empirical]. (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 289) (pp. 9–45). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter; .Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110232257.9
    • Schmidt, Karsten. (2014). Morphophonographic regularities in German: The graphematic syllable boundary. A non-linear graphematic approach [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 253–281. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.04sch
  • Fuhrhop, Nanna, Buchmann, Franziska, & Berg, Kristian. (2011). The length hierarchy and the graphematic syllable: Evidence from German and English. Written Language & Literacy, 14(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.05fuh Cited by8
    • Baroni, Antonio. (2013). Eye dialect and casual speech spelling: Orthographic variation in OT. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 24–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.808155
    • Berg, Kristian, Buchmann, Franziska, Dybiec, Katharina, & Fuhrhop, Nanna. (2014). Morphological spellings in English [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 282–307. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.05ber
    • Evertz, Martin. (2016). Minimal graphematic words in English and German: Lexical evidence for a theory of graphematic feet. Written Language & Literacy, 19(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.2.03eve
    • Evertz, Martin. (2018). Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441
    • Evertz, Martin, & Primus, Beatrice. (2017). Rhythmic constraints in handwriting: A review of Pagliarini et al. (2017). Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00006.eve
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Ryan, Des. (2017). Principles of English spelling formation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Trinity College Dublin, Dublin.
    • Schmidt, Karsten. (2014). Morphophonographic regularities in German: The graphematic syllable boundary. A non-linear graphematic approach [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 253–281. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.04sch
  • Fuhrhop, N., & Peters, J. (2013). Einführung in die Phonologie und Graphematik. Stuttgart: Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑3‑476‑00597‑7 Cited by7
    • Evertz, Martin. (2018). Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110583441
    • Evertz, Martin. (2019). The history of the graphematic foot in English and German. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 27–40). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-ever
    • Evertz-Rittich, Martin. (2021). What is a written word? And if so, how many? In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 25–45). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-ever
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020). Types of allography. Open Linguistics, 6, 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0006
    • Schmidt, Karsten. (2014). Morphophonographic regularities in German: The graphematic syllable boundary. A non-linear graphematic approach [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 253–281. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.04sch
    • Symanczyk Joppe, Vilma. (2018). Optimal spaces and hyphens: A constraint-based analysis of compound word formation [Special issue: Understanding writing systems, edited by Merijn Beeksma & Martin Neef]. Written Language & Literacy, 21(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00011.sym
  • Fuller, B., Edwards, J., & Gorman, K. (1987). Does rising literacy spark economic growth? Commercial expansion in Mexico. In D. Wagner (Ed.), The future of literacy in a changing world (pp. 319–340). New York: Pergamon Press. Cited by3
    • Olson, David R. (1994a). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Olson, David R. (1994b). Writing and industrialization. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 635–638). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Funnell, E. (1983). Phonological processes in reading: New evidence from acquired dyslexia. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 159–180. Cited by13
    • Buchanan, Lori, & Besner, Derek. (1993). Reading aloud: Evidence for the use of whole word nonsemantic pathway. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 133–152. [1995, Republished in John M.Henderson, Murray Singer & Fernanda Ferreira (Eds.), Reading and language processing (pp. 5–24). Mahwah, NJ; Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]
    • Cook, Vivian. (2004). The English writing system. (The English Language series). London Hodder Arnold. [2014, reprinted, London: New York: Routledge]
    • Cook, Vivian. (2016). Background to the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 5–23). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Jurdant, Baudouin. (1988). The role of vowels in alphabetic writing. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 381–400). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Kello, Christopher T. (2006). Considering the junction model of lexical processing. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 50–75). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Paap, Kenneth R., Noel, Ronald W., & Johansen, Linda S. (1992). Dual-route models of print to sound: Red herrings and real horses. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 293–318). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Peressotti, Francesca, & Job, Remo. (2003). Reading aloud: Dissociating the semantic pathway from the non-semantic pathway of the lexical route. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 179–194.
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Seidenberg, M. S. (1992a). Beyond orthographic depth: Equitable division of labor. In R. Frost & K. Katz (Eds.), Orthography; phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 85–118). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Woollams, Anna M. (2015). What does acquired dyslexia tell us about reading in the mind and brain? In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 149–164). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Funnell, E. (1992). On recognising misspelled words. In C. M. Sterling & C. Robson (Eds.), Psychology, spelling and education (pp. 87–99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Cited by4
    • Angelelli, Paola, Marinelli, Chiara Valeria, & Zoccolotti, Pierluigi. (2010). Single or dual orthographic representations for reading and spelling? A study of Italian dyslexic-dysgraphic and normal children. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(4), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2010.543539
    • Dixon, Maureen, Stuart, Morag, & Masterson, Jackie. (2002). The relationship between phonological awareness and the development of orthographic representations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 295–316.
    • Holmes, Virginia M., & Babauta, Mariko L. (2005). Single or dual representations for reading and spelling? [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 257–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-8129-5
    • Holmes, Virginia M., & Malone, N. (2004). Adult spelling strategies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 537–566.
  • Furet, F., & Ozouf, J. (1977). Lire et écrire: L'alphabétisation des français de Calvin à Jules Ferry (2 volumes). Paris: Éditions de Minuit. 1982, English translation, Reading and writing: Literacy in France from Calvin to Jules Ferry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press] Cited by5
    • Böhm, Manuela. (2018). The tyranny of orthography: Multilingualism and Frenchification at primary schools in late-nineteenth-century France. In Constanze Weth & Kasper Juffermans (Eds.), Tyranny of writing: Ideologies of the written word (Bloomsbury advances in sociolinguistics) (pp. 64–80). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    • Chartier, A.-M. (2009). The teaching of literacy skills in Western Europe: An historical perspective. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 451–467). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Graff, Harvey J. (1987a). The labyrinths of literacy: Reflections on literacy past and present. London: The Falmer Press. [1995, Revised and expanded edition, (Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture), Pittsburgh, PA; London: University of Pittsburgh Press]
    • Lyons, Martyn, & Marquilhas, Rita (Eds.). (2017). Approaches to the history of written culture: A world inscribed (New Directions in Book History). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54136-5
    • Pontecorvo, Clotilde (Ed.). (1997). Writing development: An interdisciplinary view (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 6). Amsterdam; Philadelpha: John Benjamins.
  • Furet, F., & Ozouf, J. (1982). Reading and writing: Literacy in France from Calvin to Jules Ferry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [1977, French original, Lire et écrire: L'alphabétisation des français de Calvin à Jules Ferry (2 volumes). Paris: Éditions de Minuit] Cited by5
    • Brandt, Deborah. (2015). The rise of writing: Redefining mass literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Cook-Gumperz, Jenny (Ed.). (2006). The social construction of literacy (Second edition) (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [1986, First edition]
    • Graff, Harvey J. (1987a). The labyrinths of literacy: Reflections on literacy past and present. London: The Falmer Press. [1995, Revised and expanded edition, (Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture), Pittsburgh, PA; London: University of Pittsburgh Press]
    • Lyons, Martyn, & Marquilhas, Rita (Eds.). (2017). Approaches to the history of written culture: A world inscribed (New Directions in Book History). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54136-5
    • Rubinger, Richard. (2000). Who can't read and write? Illiteracy in Meiji Japan. Monumenta Nipponica, 55(2), 163–198.
  • Furnes, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2009). Preschool cognitive and language skills predicting Kindergarten and Grade 1 reading and spelling: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‑9817.2009.01393.x Cited by5
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A., Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Khateb, Asaid. (2017). What contributes to spelling in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218748
    • Caravolas, Markéta, & Samara, Anna. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 326–343). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Georgiou, George K, Torppa, Minna, Manolitsis, George, Lyytinen, Heikki, & Parrila, Rauno. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of reading and spelling across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9271-x
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Yuan, Han, Segers, Eliane, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2020). Factors affecting L2 phonological awareness in Chinese-Dutch preschoolers. Written Language & Literacy, 23(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00035.yua
  • Furnes, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2011). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming predicting early development in reading and spelling: Results from a cross-linguistic longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 85–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.10.005 Cited by10
    • Ahmed, Yusra, & Wagner, Richard K. (2020). A “simple” illustration of a joint model of reading and writing using meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM). In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 55–75). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_4
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A., Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Khateb, Asaid. (2017). What contributes to spelling in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218748
    • Caravolas, Markéta, Mikulajová, Marína, & Kuchaská, Anna. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Czech and Slovak. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 96–117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.005
    • Caravolas, Markéta, & Samara, Anna. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 326–343). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Landerl, Karin. (2019). Behavioral precursors of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.011
    • Lipka, Orly, Katzir, Tami, & Shaul, Shelley. (2016). The basis of reading fluency in first grade of Hebrew speaking children. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 91–104). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_6
    • Papadopoulos, Timothy C., Georgiou, George K., & Apostolou, Theodosia. (2020). The role of distal and proximal cognitive processes in literacy skills in Greek. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 171–184). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_11
    • Shechter, Ady, Lipka, Orly, & Katzir, Tami. (2018). Predictive models of word reading fluency in Hebrew. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:1882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01882
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Perfetti, Charles, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Introduction: Developmental dyslexia – A cross-linguistic perspective. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.001
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fushimi, T., Ijuin, M., Patterson, K., & Tatsumi, I. F. (1999). Consistency, frequency, and lexicality effects in naming Japanese kanji. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 382–407. Cited by5
    • Joyce, Terry. (2004). Modeling the Japanese mental lexicon: Morphological, orthographic and phonological considerations. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in Psychological Research: Volume 31 (pp. 27–61). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
    • Joyce, Terry. (2005). Constructing a large-scale database of Japanese word associations. In Katsuo Tamaoka (Ed.), Corpus studies on Japanese kanji (Glottometrics 10) (pp. 82–98). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo; Lüdenschied, Germany: RAM-Verlag.
    • Masuda, Hisashi, & Joyce, Terry. (2005). A database of two-kanji compound words featuring morphological family, morphological structure, and semantic category data. In Katsuo Tamaoka, (Ed.), Corpus studies on Japanese kanji (Glottometrics 10) (pp. 30–44). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo; Lüdenschied, Germany: RAM-Verlag.
    • Uno, Akira, Wydell, Taeko N., Haruhara, Noriko, Kaneko, Masato, & Shinya, Naoko. (2009). Relationship between reading/writing skills and cognitive abilities among Japanese primary-school children: Normal readers versus poor readers (dyslexics) [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 755–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9128-8
    • Wydell, Taeko N. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Japanese. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 176–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.009
  • Fyfe, Aileen. (2016). Journals and periodicals. In Bernard Lightman (Ed.), A companion to the history of science (Blackwell Companions to History) (pp. 358–371). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Compiled and edited by Terry Joyce. © April, 2022