• Zabel, Hermann. (1986). Zur Schreibung von Fremdwörtern im Deutschen - Probleme der Regelformulierung [On the spelling of foreign words in german - Problems of rule formulation]. In Gerhard Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphematics and orthography (pp. 179–196). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Zachrison, R. E. (1930). Anglic, a new agreed simplified English spelling. Uppsala: Almquist & Wiksell. Cited by6
    • Coulmas, Florian. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Stubbs, Michael. (1980). Language and literacy: The sociolinguistics of reading and writing. London; Boston; Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Vachek, Josef. (1973). Written language: General problems and problems of English (Janua Linguarum, Series Critica 14). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Venezky, Richard L. (1970c). The structure of English orthography (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor 82). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Yule, Valerie, & Ishi, Yasuko. (2016). Spelling reform. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 413–427). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Zachrison, R. E. (1931). Four hundred years of English spelling reform. Studia Nephilologica, 4, 1–68. Cited by6
    • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag]
    • DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    • Gibson, Eleanor J., & Levin, Harry. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Nerius, Dieter. (1994). Orthographieentwicklung und Orthographiereform [Development and reform of orthography]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 1. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 1] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:1) (pp. 720–739). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Vachek, Josef. (1973). Written language: General problems and problems of English (Janua Linguarum, Series Critica 14). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
    • Venezky, Richard L. (1970c). The structure of English orthography (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor 82). The Hague; Paris: Mouton.
  • Zadeh, Zohreh Yaghoub, Farnia, Fataneh, & Geva, Esther. (2012). Toward modeling reading comprehension and reading fluency in English language learners. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9252-0
  • Zadka, Małgorzata. (2012). Differences in the level of literacy between Minoan and Mycenaean societies in the light of the analysis of types and probable use of inscribed objects. Lingua Posnaniensis, LIV(1), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10122-012-0010-4
  • Zadka, Małgorzata. (2018). Semasiographic principle in Linear B inscriptions. Writing Systems Research, 10(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2019.1588835
  • Žagar, Mateo. (2020). Orthographic solutions at the onset of Early Modern Croatian: An application of the grapholinguistic method. In Marco Condorelli (Ed.), Advances in historical orthography, c. 1500–1800 (pp. 176–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674171.009
  • Zaidel, E., & Peters, A. M. (1981). Phonological encoding and ideographic reading by the disconnected right hemisphere: Two case studies. Brain and Language, 14(2), 205–234. Cited by5
    • de Kerckhove, Derrick. (1988b). Critical brain processes involved in deciphering the Greek alphabet. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 401–421). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Taylor, Insup. (1988). Psychology of literacy: East and west. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 202–233). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Tzeng, Ovid J. L., & Hung, Daisy L. (1988b). Orthography, reading, and cerebral functions. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 273–290). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Tzeng, Ovid J. L., Hung, Daisy L., Lee, Wei Ling, & Chang, Ji-Mei. (1996). Cross-Linguistic analyses of basic reading processes. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1101–1117). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
  • Zair, Nicholas. (2013). Individualism in “Osco-Greek” orthography. In Esther-Miriam Wagner, Ben Outhwaite, & Bettina Beinhoff (Eds.), Scribes as agents of language change (Studies in Language Change 10) (pp. 217–226). Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter. Cited by1
    • Jones, Mari C., & Mooney, Damien (Eds.). (2017). Creating orthographies for endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316562949
  • Zang, Kehe. (2017a). Inaugural editorial: Promoting the understanding of ideographic writings. Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2513850217709221
  • Zang, Kehe. (2017b). A supplement to the studies of tralatitious editions of Shangshu and the character issues (II): A version comparison of Yueming. Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, 1(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2513850217709217
  • Zang, Kehe. (2018). On the cognitive strategy of ideographic writing: Taking the semanto-phonetic structure of Chu bamboo-strip scripts as an example. Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, 2(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2513850217748208
  • Zangwill, O. L., & Blakemore, C. (1972). Dyslexia: Reversal of eye movements during reading. Neuropsychologia, 10, 371–373. Cited by3
    • Levy-Schoen, Ariane, & O'Regan, Kevin. (1979). The control of eye movements in reading (tutorial paper). In Paul A. Kolers, Merald E. Wrolstad, & Herman Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language: Volume 1 New York; London: Plenum Press.
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
  • Zaretsky, E. (2002). Effects of oral language on sound segmentation skills: Cross linguistic evidence. In W. Fay & K. M. Louise (Eds.), Investigations in clinical phonetics and linguistics (pp. 201–212). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by7
    • Kerek, Eugenia, & Niemi, Pekka. (2012). Grain-size units of phonological awareness among Russian first graders. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1), 80–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.05ker
    • Leikin, Mark, Schwartz, Mila, & Share, David L. (2010). General and specific benefits of bi-literate bilingualism: A Russian–Hebrew study of beginning literacy [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9210-x
    • Leikin, Mark, Share, David L., & Schwartz, Mila. (2005). Difficulties in L2 Hebrew reading in Russian-speaking second graders. Reading and Writing, 18(59, 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-8919-4
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, Kogan, Nadya, & Walters, Joel. (2010). Universal and language-specific constraints on phonemic awareness: Evidence from Russian–Hebrew bilingual children. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9204-8
    • Schwartz, Mila, Geva, Esther, Share, David L., & Leikin, Mark. (2007). Learning to read in English as third language: The cross-linguistic transfer of phonological processing skills. Written Language & Literacy, 10(1), 25–52.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Leikin, Mark, & Share, David L. (2005). Bi-literate bilingualism versus mono-literate bilingualism: A longitudinal study of reading acquisition in Hebrew (L2) among Russian-speaking (L1) children [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 179–206.
    • Schwartz, Mila, Share, David L., Leikin, Mark, & Kozminsky, Ely. (2008). On the benefits of bi-literacy: Just a head start in reading or specific orthographic insights? Reading and Writing, 21(9), 905–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9097-3
  • Zaretsky, Elena. (2014). The role of L1 and L2 reading on L1 preservation and positive cross-linguistic transfer among sequential bilinguals [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.07zar
  • Zaretsky, Elena, Kraljevic, Jelena Kuvac, Core, Cynthia, & Lencek, Mirjana. (2009). Literacy predictors and early reading and spelling skills as a factor of orthography: Cross-linguistic evidence. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 52–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.03zar Cited by1
    • Kerek, Eugenia, & Niemi, Pekka. (2012). Grain-size units of phonological awareness among Russian first graders. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1), 80–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.05ker
  • Zaretsky, Elena, & Schwartz, Mila. (2014). Foreword: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual contexts – recent research trends [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), vii-x. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.001for Cited by1
    • Jones, Mari C., & Mooney, Damien (Eds.). (2017). Creating orthographies for endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316562949
  • Zavorin, Ilya, & Borovikov, Eugene. (2012). Data collection and annotation for Arabic document analysis. In Volker Märgner & Haikal El Abed (Eds.), Guide to OCR for Arabic scripts (pp. 375–394). Berlin: Springer. Cited by1
    • Borovikov, Eugene, & Zavorin, Ilya. (2012). A multi-stage approach to Arabic document analysis. In Volker Märgner & Haikal El Abed (Eds.), Guide to OCR for Arabic scripts (pp. 55–78). Berlin: Springer.
  • Zelenkauskaite, Asta. (2017). Abbreviate and insert? Message length, addressee and non-standard writing in Italian mobile texting and Facebook. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1389797
  • Zender, M. U. (1999). Diacritical marks and underspelling in the classic Maya script: Implications for decipherment (Unpublished M.A. thesis). Calgary, Canada: Department of Archaeology, University of Calgary. Cited by8
    • Boot, Erik. (2010b). Loanwords, “foreign words,” and foreign signs in Maya writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 129–177). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Boyes, Philip J., Steele, Philippa M., & Elvira Astoreca, Natalia (Eds). (2021). The social and cultural contexts of historic writing practices. Oxford; Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2012). The shape of script: How and why writing systems change (School for Advanced Research Advanced Seminar Series). Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
    • Matsumoto, Mallory E. (2017). From sound to symbol: Orthographic semantization in Maya hieroglyphic writing. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1335634
    • Mora-Marín, David F. (2003). The origin of Mayan syllabograms and orthographic conventions. Written Language & Literacy, 6(2), 193–238.
    • Mora-Marín, David. (2010). Consonant deletion, obligatory synharmony, typical suffixing: An explanation of spelling practices in Mayan writing. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 118–179. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.05mor
    • Mora-Marín, David. (2016). A study in Mayan paleography: The history of T168/2M1a ʔAJAW ‘Lord, Ruler’ and the origin of the syllabogram T130/2S2 wa. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 35–74. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.02mor
    • Osterkamp, Sven, & Schreiber, Gordian. (2021). Challenging the dichotomy between phonography and morphography: Transitions and gray areas. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 47–82). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-oste
  • Zeno, S. M., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator's word frequency guide. Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates. Cited by13
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., Hutchinson, Keith A., & Cortese, Michael J. (2012). Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 90–115). London: Psychology Press.
    • Brysbaert, Marc, & New, Boris. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
    • Cahill, Lynne, & Joyce, Terry. (2017). Introduction: Orthographic databases and lexicons [Special issue: Orthographic databases and lexicons, edited by Lynne Cahill & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 20(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.20.1.01cah
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, & Dhooge, Sarah. (2010). Developmental stability and changes in the impact of root consistency on children's spelling. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1055–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9195-5
    • Joshi, R. Malatesha, Høien, Torleiv, Feng, Xiwu, Chengappa, Rajni, & Boulware-Gooden, Regina. (2006). Learning to spell by ear any by eye: A cross-linguistic comparison. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 569–577). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Kessler, Brett. (2009). Statistical learning of conditional orthographic correspondences. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp004
    • Kessler, Brett, Treiman, Rebecca, & Mullennix, John. (2008). Feedback-consistency effects in single-word reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 159–174). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Morris, Darrell, Trathen, Woodrow, Lomax, Richard G., Perney, Jan, Kucan, Linda, Frye, Elizabeth M., Bloodgood, Janet W., Ward, Devery, & Schlagal, Robert. (2012). Modeling aspects of print-processing skill: Implications for reading assessment. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 189–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9253-z
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Schwanenflugel, Paula J., Morris, Robin D., Kuhn, Melanie R., Strauss, Gregory P., & Sieczko, Jennifer M. (2008). The influence of reading unit size on the development of Stroop interference in early word decoding. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 177–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9061-2
    • Vaughn, Sharon, Wanzek, Jeanne, Wexler, Jade, Barth, Amy, Cirino, Paul T., Fletcher, Jack, Romain, Melissa, Denton, Carolyn A., Roberts, Greg, & Francis, David. (2010). The relative effects of group size on reading progress of older students with reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 931–956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9183-9
    • Weekes, Brendan S., Castles, Anne E., & Davis, Robert A. (2006). Effects of consistency and age of acquisition on reading and spelling among developing readers. Reading and Writing, 19(2), 133–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2032-6
  • Zesiger, P., Orliaguet, J., Boë, L., & Mounoud, P. (1994). The influence of syllabic structure in handwriting and typing production. In C. Faure, P. Keuss, G. Lorette, & A. Vinter (Eds.), Advances in handwriting and drawing: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 389–401). Paris: Europia. Cited by5
    • Kandel, Sonia, Solger, Olga, Valdois, Sylivane, & Gros, Céline. (2006). Graphemes as motor units in the acquisition of writing skills. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4321-5
    • Lambert, Eric, Kandel, Sonia, Fayol, Michel, & Espéret, Eric. (2008). The effect of the number of syllables on handwriting production. Reading and Writing, 21(9), 859–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9095-5
    • Nottbusch, Guido. (2010). Grammatical planning, execution, and control in written sentence production [Special issue: Reading during writing. What does eyetracking research tell us about the interaction between reading and writing processes during text production?, edited by Luuk Van Waes, Mariëlle, Leijten, & Åsa Wengelin]. Reading and Writing, 23(7), 777–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9188-4
    • Nottbusch, Guido, Grimm, Angela, Weingarten, Rüdiger, & Will, Udo. (2005). Syllabic structures in typing: Evidence from deaf writers. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 497–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3178-y
    • Vilageliu, Olga Soler, & Kandel, Sonia. (2012). A longitudinal study of handwriting skills in pre-schoolers: The acquisition of syllable oriented programming strategies. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9251-1
  • Zevin, Jason D. (2019). Modeling developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 372–390). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.017
  • Zevin, J. D., & Balota, D. A. (2000). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 121–135. Cited by5
    • Balota, David A., & Yap, Melvin J. (2006). Attentional control and the flexible lexical processor: Explorations of the magic moment of word recognition. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 229–258). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., Hutchinson, Keith A., & Cortese, Michael J. (2012). Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 90–115). London: Psychology Press.
    • Kello, Christopher T. (2006). Considering the junction model of lexical processing. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 50–75). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Maurer, Urs, & McCandliss, Bruce D. (2008). The development of visual expertise for words: The contribution of electrophysiology. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 43–63). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 1–29. Cited by10
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Brysbaert, Marc, & New, Boris. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
    • Davies, Robert A. I., & Cuetos, Fernando. (2010). Reading acquisition and dyslexia in Spanish. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 155–180). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Janyan, Armina, & Andonova, Elena. (2006). Word reading in Bulgarian children and adults. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 275–290). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Raman, Ilhan, Raman, Evren, İkier, Simay, Kilecioğlu, Elçin, Eroğlu, Dilek Uzun, & Zeyveli, Şebnem. (2018). Differential effects of age of acquisition and frequency on memory: Evidence from free recall of pictures and words in Turkish. Writing Systems Research, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1420727
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Seidenberg, Mark S. (2007). Connectionist models of reading. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 235–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Volkovyskaya, Evgenia, Raman, Ilhan, & Baluch, Bahman. (2017). Age of acquisition (AoA) effect in monolingual Russian and bilingual Russian (L1)-English (L2) speakers in a free recall task. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1405136
    • Weekes, Brendan S. (2010). Lexical retrieval in alphabetic and non-alphabetic scripts: Evidence from brain imaging. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 273–289). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Weekes, Brendan S., Castles, Anne E., & Davis, Robert A. (2006). Effects of consistency and age of acquisition on reading and spelling among developing readers. Reading and Writing, 19(2), 133–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2032-6
  • Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory. Memory & Cognition, 32, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195818 Cited by5
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., Hutchinson, Keith A., & Cortese, Michael J. (2012). Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 90–115). London: Psychology Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2019). EPS mid-career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819829696
    • Volkovyskaya, Evgenia, Raman, Ilhan, & Baluch, Bahman. (2017). Age of acquisition (AoA) effect in monolingual Russian and bilingual Russian (L1)-English (L2) speakers in a free recall task. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1405136
    • Weekes, Brendan S., Castles, Anne E., & Davis, Robert A. (2006). Effects of consistency and age of acquisition on reading and spelling among developing readers. Reading and Writing, 19(2), 133–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2032-6
  • Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2006). Simulating consistency effects and individual differences in nonword naming: A comparison of current models. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 145–160. Cited by5
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Coltheart, Max. (2012). Dual-route theories of reading aloud. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–27). London: Psychology Press.
    • Seidenberg, Mark S., & Plaut, David C. (2006). Progress in understanding word reading: Data fitting versus theory building. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 25–49). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Balota, David A. (2015). Visual word recognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 26–43). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2016). Processing the written word. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 453–469). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Zhang, Biyin, & Peng, Danling. (1992). Decomposed storage in the Chinese lexicon. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 131–149). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. Cited by11
    • Cheung, Him, McBride-Chang, Catherine, & Chow, Bonnie Wing-Yin. (2006). Reading Chinese. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 421–438). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Chikamatsu, Nobuko. (2005). L2 Japanese kanji memory and retrieval: An experiment on the tip-of-the-pen (TOP) phenomenon. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 71–96). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Dronjic, Vedran. (2011). Mandarin Chinese compounds, their representation, and processing in the visual modality [Special issue: Linguistic and cognitive factors in reading Chinese, edited by Xi Chen & Yang C. Luo]. Writing Systems Research, 3(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr005
    • Koda, Keiko, & Miller, Ryan T. (2018). Cross-linguistic interactions in L2 word meaning inference in English as a foreign language. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 293–312). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Ku, Yu-Min, & Anderson, Richard C. (2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(5), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024227231216
    • Lin, Tsu-Jung, Anderson, Richard C., Ku, Yu-Min, Christianson, Kiel, & Packard, Jerome L. (2011). Chinese children's concept of word [Special issue: Linguistic and cognitive factors in reading Chinese, edited by Xi Chen & Yang C. Luo]. Writing Systems Research, 3(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr007
    • Liu, Ying, & Peng, Dan-ling. (1997). Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 219–232). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo. (2005). The effect of morphemic homophony on the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words. Reading and Writing, 18(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3354-0
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo, & Hatsuzuka, Makiko. (1998). The effects of morphological semantics on the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 293–322. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 139–168). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo, & Taft, Marcus. (2010). The sensitivity of native Japanese speakers to On and Kun kanji readings. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 957–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9184-8
    • Zhang, Jie, Anderson, Richard C., Li, Hong, Dong, Qiong, Wu, Xinchun, & Zhang, Yan. (2010). Cross-language transfer of insight into the structure of compound words [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9205-7
  • Zhang, G., & Simon, H. A. (1985). STM capacity for Chinese words and idioms: Chunking and acoustical loop hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 13(3), 193–201. Cited by8
    • Chikamatsu, Nobuko. (2005). L2 Japanese kanji memory and retrieval: An experiment on the tip-of-the-pen (TOP) phenomenon. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 71–96). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Hoosain, Rumjahn. (1992). Psychological reality of the word in Chinese. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 111–130). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Koda, Keiko. (1995). Cognitive consequences of L1 and L2 orthographies. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 311–326). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Meuter, Renata F. I., & Ehrich, John F. (2012). The acquisition of an artificial logographic script and bilingual working memory: Evidence for L1-specific orthographic processing skills transfer in Chinese-English bilinguals [Special issue: Second language writing systems, edited by Benedetta Bassetti, Jyotsna Vaid, & Vivian Cook]. Writing Systems Research, 4(1), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.665011
    • Pak, Ada K. H., Cheng-Lai, Alice, Tso, Ivy F., Shu, Hua, Lia, Wenling, & Anderson, Richard C. (2005). Visual chunking skills of Hong Kong children. Reading and Writing, 18(5), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-6575-3
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1995). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.3 [2014, Revised edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14)]
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
  • Zhang, Hong-Mei, & Mao, Yuan-Ming. (2017). An overview of ancient Chinese character inscriptions of national minorities. Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, 1(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/2513850217709219
  • Zhang, Jie, Anderson, Richard C., Li, Hong, Dong, Qiong, Wu, Xinchun, & Zhang, Yan. (2010). Cross-language transfer of insight into the structure of compound words [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9205-7 Cited by3
    • Koh, Poh Wee, Chen, Xi, & Gottardo, Alexandra. (2018). How do phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and vocabulary knowledge relate to word reading within and between English and Chinese? In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 73–98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Luo, Yang Cathy, Chen, Xi, & Geva, Esther. (2014). Concurrent and longitudinal cross-linguistic transfer of phonological awareness and morphological awareness in Chinese-English bilingual children [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.05luo
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edition) (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 14). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [1995, First edition, (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 3)]
  • Zhang, Juan, & McBride-Chang, Catherine. (2011). Diversity in Chinese literacy acquisition [Special issue: Linguistic and cognitive factors in reading Chinese, edited by Xi Chen & Yang C. Luo]. Writing Systems Research, 3(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr011 Cited by3
    • Chang, Li-Yun, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2018). Visual factors in writing system variation: Measurement and implications for reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 49–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Kalindi, Sylvia Chanda, Chung, Kevin Kien Hoa, Liu, Duo Phil, & Wang, Li-Chih Angus. (2018). The complexities of written Chinese and the cognitive-linguistic precursors to reading, with consequent implications for reading interventions. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 99–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Tong, Xiuhong, Mo, Jianhong, Shu, Hua, Zhang, Yuping, Chan, Shingfong, & McBride-Chang, Catherine. (2014). Understanding Chinese children's complex writing: Global ratings and lower-level mechanical errors. Writing Systems Research, 6(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.873707
  • Zhang, S., & Perfetti, C. A. (1993). The tongue-twister effect in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1082–1093. Cited by12
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Koda, Keiko. (2009). Learning to read in new writing systems. In Michael H. Long & Catherine J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching. Blackwell Publishing.
    • Matsunaga, Sachiko. (2002b). Early phonological activation in reading kanji: An eye-tracking study. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 157–171). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Matsunaga, Sachiko. (2016). Teaching and learning to read kanji as L2: Why are they difficult? In Jun Xing, & Pak-sheung Ng (Eds.), Indigenous culture, education and globalization: Critical perspectives from Asia (pp. 245–262). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48159-2_13
    • Mori, Yoshiko. (2012). Five myths about kanji and kanji learning. Japanese Language and Literature, 46, 143–169.
    • Perfetti, Charles A., & Liu, Ying. (2005). Orthography to phonology and meaning: Comparisons across and within writing systems [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2344-y
    • Perfetti, Charles A., Liu, Ying, & Tan, Li-Tan. (2002). How the mind can meet the brain in reading: A comparative writing systems approach. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 35–60). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo. (2005). The effect of morphemic homophony on the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words. Reading and Writing, 18(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3354-0
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo. (2007). Rebounding activation caused by lexical homophony in the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9036-8
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo, & Hatsuzuka, Makiko. (1998). The effects of morphological semantics on the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 293–322. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 139–168). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Weekes, B. S., Chen, M. J., & Lin, Y-B. (1998). Differential effects of phonological priming on Chinese character recognition [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 201–222. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 47–68). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
  • Zhang, S., Perfetti, C. A., & Yang, H. (1999). Whole word, frequency-general phonology in semantic processing of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 858–875. Cited by4
    • Halderman, Laura K., Ashby, Jane, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2012). Phonology: An early and integral role in identifying words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 207–228). London: Psychology Press.
    • Kaminska, Zofia. (2003). Little Frog and Toad: Interaction of orthography and phonology in Polish spelling [Special issue: edited by São Luís Castro & Luz Cary]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1/2), 61–80.
    • Perfetti, Charles A., & Liu, Ying. (2005). Orthography to phonology and meaning: Comparisons across and within writing systems [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2344-y
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo. (2007). Rebounding activation caused by lexical homophony in the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9036-8
  • Zhao, Ping'an. (2018). A discussion on “zhenren” in Chu bamboo and silk manuscripts. Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, 2(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2513850217748369
  • Zhao, Shouhui. (2008). Chinese character modernisation in the digital era: A historical perspective. In Robert B. Kaplan & Richard B. Baldauf Jr. (Eds.), Language planning and policy in Asia, Volume 1: Japan, Nepal, Taiwan and Chinese characters (Language Planning and Policy) (pp. 38–101). Bristol; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
  • Zhao, Shouhui, & Baldauf, Richard B. Jr. (2008). Planning Chinese characters: Reaction, evolution or revolution (Language Policy 9). Dordrecht: Springer. Cited by8
    • Galambos, Imre. (2014b). The Chinese script. Chinese Studies, Oxford Bibliographies (added: 28/04/2014). http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/browse?module_0=obo-9780199920082
    • Kaplan, Robert B., & Baldauf, Richard B. Jr. (2008). Language policy and planning in Chinese characters, Japan, Nepal and Taiwan: Some common issues. In Robert B. Kaplan & Richard B. Baldauf Jr. (Eds.), Language planning and policy in Asia, Volume 1: Japan, Nepal, Taiwan and Chinese characters (Language Planning and Policy) (pp. 7–37). Bristol; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Leung, Genevieve Y., & Wu, Ming-Hsuan. (2012). Linguistic landscape and heritage language literacy education: A case study of linguistic rescaling in Philadelphia Chinatown. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1), 114–140. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.06leu
    • Li, Yu. (2020). The Chinese writing system in Asia: An interdisciplinary perspective. London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345333
    • Sproat, Richard. (2008). [Book review: Shouhui Zhao & Richard B. Baldauf, Jr., (2008), Planning Chinese characters: Reaction, evolution or revolution]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.07spr
    • Sproat, Richard. (2010). Language, technology, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Wang, Shaomei. (2012a). Chinese writing reform: A socio-psycholinguistic perspective. In Ken Goodman, Shaomei Wang, Mieko Shimizu Iventosch, & Yetta Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 45–67). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Zhao, Shouhui. (2008). Chinese character modernisation in the digital era: A historical perspective. In Robert B. Kaplan & Richard B. Baldauf Jr. (Eds.), Language planning and policy in Asia, Volume 1: Japan, Nepal, Taiwan and Chinese characters (Language Planning and Policy) (pp. 38–101). Bristol; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
  • Zheltukhin, Alexander. (2012). Variable norms in 16th-century Swedish orthography. In Susan Baddeley & Anja Voeste (Eds.), Orthographies in Early Modern Europe (pp. 193–218). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Cited by1
    • Condorelli, Marco (Ed.). (2020). Advances in historical orthography, c. 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674171
  • Zhou, Minglang. (2001). Language policy and reforms of writing systems for minority languages in China. Written Language & Literacy, 4(1), 31–65.
  • Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1994). Words, morphemes and syllables in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 393–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402125 Cited by9
    • Chikamatsu, Nobuko. (2005). L2 Japanese kanji memory and retrieval: An experiment on the tip-of-the-pen (TOP) phenomenon. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (pp. 71–96). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Dronjic, Vedran. (2011). Mandarin Chinese compounds, their representation, and processing in the visual modality [Special issue: Linguistic and cognitive factors in reading Chinese, edited by Xi Chen & Yang C. Luo]. Writing Systems Research, 3(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr005
    • Koda, Keiko, & Miller, Ryan T. (2018). Cross-linguistic interactions in L2 word meaning inference in English as a foreign language. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 293–312). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Koh, Poh Wee, Chen, Xi, & Gottardo, Alexandra. (2018). How do phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and vocabulary knowledge relate to word reading within and between English and Chinese? In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 73–98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Liu, Ying, & Peng, Dan-ling. (1997). Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 219–232). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Parkard, Jerome, Chen, Xi, Li, Wenling, Wu, Xinchun, Gaffney, Janet S., Li, Hong, & Anderson, Richard C. (2006). Explicit instruction in orthographic structure and word morphology helps Chinese children learn to write characters. Reading and Writing, 19(5), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9003-4
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo, & Hatsuzuka, Makiko. (1998). The effects of morphological semantics on the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 293–322. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 139–168). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo, & Taft, Marcus. (2010). The sensitivity of native Japanese speakers to On and Kun kanji readings. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 957–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9184-8
    • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1997). The abstractness of phonological representation in the mental lexicon. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 3–26). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  • Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1995). Morphological structure in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 545–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407114 Cited by5
    • Dronjic, Vedran. (2011). Mandarin Chinese compounds, their representation, and processing in the visual modality [Special issue: Linguistic and cognitive factors in reading Chinese, edited by Xi Chen & Yang C. Luo]. Writing Systems Research, 3(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr005
    • Leong, Che-Kan. (2002a). ‘Cognitive conjunction’ analysis of processing Chinese. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 1–31). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Singh, Anisha. (2018). Introduction to script processing in Chinese and cognitive consequences for bilingual reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 25–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Parkard, Jerome, Chen, Xi, Li, Wenling, Wu, Xinchun, Gaffney, Janet S., Li, Hong, & Anderson, Richard C. (2006). Explicit instruction in orthographic structure and word morphology helps Chinese children learn to write characters. Reading and Writing, 19(5), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9003-4
    • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1997). The abstractness of phonological representation in the mental lexicon. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 3–26). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  • Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1996). Direct visual access is the only way to access the Chinese mental lexicon. In G. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 714–719). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum. Cited by5
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Matsunaga, Sachiko. (2002b). Early phonological activation in reading kanji: An eye-tracking study. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 157–171). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Perfetti, Charles A., Liu, Ying, & Tan, Li-Tan. (2002). How the mind can meet the brain in reading: A comparative writing systems approach. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 35–60). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Yamada, Jun, & Takashima, Hiroomi. (2001). The semantic effect on retrieval of radicals in logographic characters. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1/2), 179–194.
  • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1997). The abstractness of phonological representation in the mental lexicon. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 3–26). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  • Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson,W. (1999). Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 579–606. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2663 Cited by6
    • Behr, Wolfgang. (2010). In the interstices of representation: Ludic writing and the locus of polysemy in the Chinese sign. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 281–314). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Cao, Fan. (2018). Brain mechanisms of Chinese word reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 137–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Cheung, Him, McBride-Chang, Catherine, & Chow, Bonnie Wing-Yin. (2006). Reading Chinese. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 421–438). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Shuai, Lan, Frost, Stephen J., Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Neurocognitive markers of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 277–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.013
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo. (2007). Rebounding activation caused by lexical homophony in the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9036-8
    • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1999b). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837.
  • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1999b). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837. Cited by2
    • Su, I-Fan, Klingebiel, Kathrin, & Weekes, Brendan S. (2010). Dyslexia in Chinese: Implications for connectionist models of reading. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 199–219). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo. (2007). Rebounding activation caused by lexical homophony in the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9036-8
  • Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1245–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1245 Cited by7
    • Cheung, Him, McBride-Chang, Catherine, & Chow, Bonnie Wing-Yin. (2006). Reading Chinese. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 421–438). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Ko, In Yeong. (2018). The time course of activation of semantic and orthographic information in morphological decomposition by Korean adults and developing readers. Frontiers in Communication, 3:51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00051
    • Liu, Duo, & Zhu, Xiaoqin. (2016). The associations of phonological awareness, morphological awareness, orthographic awareness and RAN with Hong Kong Chinese children's literacy performance at word level. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218747
    • Reid, Agnieszka A. (2006). Developmental dyslexia: Evidence from Polish. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 249–274). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Shuai, Lan, Frost, Stephen J., Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Neurocognitive markers of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 277–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.013
    • Williams, Clay, & Bever, Thomas. (2010). Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias? Reading and Writing, 23(5), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9228-0
    • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1999b). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837.
  • Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5–6), 525–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386185 Cited by7
    • Cheung, Him, McBride-Chang, Catherine, & Chow, Bonnie Wing-Yin. (2006). Reading Chinese. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 421–438). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Dronjic, Vedran. (2011). Mandarin Chinese compounds, their representation, and processing in the visual modality [Special issue: Linguistic and cognitive factors in reading Chinese, edited by Xi Chen & Yang C. Luo]. Writing Systems Research, 3(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr005
    • Handel, Zev. (2015). Logography and the classification of writing systems: A response to Unger. Scripta, 7, 109–150.
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Ko, In Yeong. (2018). The time course of activation of semantic and orthographic information in morphological decomposition by Korean adults and developing readers. Frontiers in Communication, 3:51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00051
    • Lin, Candise Yue, Wang, Min, & Singh, Anisha. (2018). Introduction to script processing in Chinese and cognitive consequences for bilingual reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 25–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Pae, Hye K., Bae, Sungbong, & Yi, Kwangoh. (2019). More than an alphabet: Linguistic features of Korean and their influences on Hangul word recognition [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00027.pae
    • Williams, Clay, & Bever, Thomas. (2010). Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias? Reading and Writing, 23(5), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9228-0
  • Zhou, Y. G. (1978). Xiandai hanzi zhong shengpangde biaoyin gongneng wenti [To what degree are the “phonetics” of present-day Chinese characters still phonetic?]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Chinese Languagel], 146(3), 172–177. Cited by21
    • Caravolas, Markéta, & Samara, Anna. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 326–343). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • DeFrancis, John. (1984a). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. [2011, Die chinesische Sprache: Fakten und Mythen (Translated by Stephan Puhl). Nettetal: Steyler Verlag]
    • Erbaugh, Mary S. (Ed.). (2002). Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing (Pathways to Advanced Skills 6). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center, Ohio State University.
    • Hanley, J. Richard, Tzeng, Ovid, & Huang, H.-S. (1999). Learning to read Chinese. In Margaret Harris & Giyoo Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 173–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Hue, Chih-Wei. (1992). Recognition processes in character naming. In Hsuan-Chih Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (Advances in Psychology 90) (pp. 93–107). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Hung, Daisy L., Tzeng, Ovid J. L., & Tzeng, Angela K. Y. (1992). Automatic activation of linguistic information in Chinese character recognition. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 119–130). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Kalindi, Sylvia Chanda, Chung, Kevin Kien Hoa, Liu, Duo Phil, & Wang, Li-Chih Angus. (2018). The complexities of written Chinese and the cognitive-linguistic precursors to reading, with consequent implications for reading interventions. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 99–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Liu, In-Mao. (1995). Script factors that affect literacy: Alphabetic vs. logographic languages. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy: Reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters (Neuropsychology and Cognition 7) (pp. 145–162). Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Liu, In-Mao. (1997). The issue of prelexical phonology in the reading of Chinese characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 65–75). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • McDougall, Siné, Brunswick, Nicola, & de Mornay Davies, Paul. (2010). Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies: An introduction and overview. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 3–21). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Myers, James. (2019). The grammar of Chinese characters: Productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthograhic system (Routledge Studies in East Asian Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Parkard, Jerome, Chen, Xi, Li, Wenling, Wu, Xinchun, Gaffney, Janet S., Li, Hong, & Anderson, Richard C. (2006). Explicit instruction in orthographic structure and word morphology helps Chinese children learn to write characters. Reading and Writing, 19(5), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9003-4
    • Perfetti, Charles A., Liu, Ying, & Tan, Li-Tan. (2002). How the mind can meet the brain in reading: A comparative writing systems approach. In Henry S. R. Kao, Cke-Kan Leong, & Ding-Guo Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 35–60). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    • Perfetti, Charles A., Zhang, Sulan, & Berent, Iris. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a “universal” phonological principle. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62798-3
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Tzeng, Ovid J. L., & Hung, Daisy L. (1988b). Orthography, reading, and cerebral functions. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 273–290). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Tzeng, Ovid J. L., Hung, Daisy L., Lee, Wei Ling, & Chang, Ji-Mei. (1996). Cross-Linguistic analyses of basic reading processes. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1101–1117). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Weekes, B. S., Chen, M. J., & Lin, Y-B. (1998). Differential effects of phonological priming on Chinese character recognition [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 201–222. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 47–68). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Wu, Jei-Tun, & Liu, In-Mao. (1997). Phonological activation in pronouncing characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 47–64). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  • Zhu, X., & Taft, M. (1994). The influence of perceptual experience on Chinese character processing. In H.-W. Chang, J.-T. Huang, C.-W. Hue, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Advances in the study of Chinese language processing (pp. 85–100). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University. Cited by5
    • Law, Nancy, Ki, W. W., Chung, A. L. S., Ko, P. Y., & Lam, H. C. (1998). Children's stroke sequence errors in writing Chinese characters [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 267–292. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008091730338 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 113–138). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Peng, Dan-ling, Li, Yan-ping, & Yang, Hui 1997). Orthographic processing in the Identification of Chinese characters. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 85–108). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Tamaoka, Katsuo, & Hatsuzuka, Makiko. (1998). The effects of morphological semantics on the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 293–322. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 139–168). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1999b). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837.
  • Zhukova, Marina, & Grigorenko, Elena. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Russian. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 133–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.007
  • Zide, Norman. (1996). Scripts for Munda languages. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 612–618). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited by3
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The writing revolution: Cuneiform to the internet (The Language Library). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Unseth, Peter. (2005). Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns
  • Ziegler, Johannes, Bertrand, Daisy, Tóth, Dénes, Csépe, Valéria, Reis, Alexandra, Faísca, Luís, Saine, Nina, Lyytinen, Heikki, Vaessen, Anniek, & Blomert, Leo. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21(4), 551–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363406 Cited by30
    • Abu Ahmad, Hanadi, Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Share, David L. (2014). Cognitive predictors of early reading ability in Arabic: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to grade 2. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 171–194). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A. (2017). Reading Arabic with the diacritics for short vowels: Vowelised but not necessarily easy to read. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1400493
    • Bar-Kochva, Irit, Khateb, Asaid, & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2016). Introduction. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 1–7). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_1
    • Borgwaldt, Susanne R. (2010). [Book review: Liliane Sprenger-Charolles, Pascale Colé & Willy Serniclaes, (2007), Reading acquisition and developmental dyslexia]. Written Language & Literacy, 13(2), 278–281. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.2.06bor
    • Caravolas, Markéta, & Samara, Anna. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 326–343). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Cho, Jeung-Ryeul. (2018). Cognitive-linguistic skills and reading and writing in Korean Hangul, Chinese Hanja, and English among Korean children. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 391–410). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, Desrochers, Alain, & Levesque, Kyle. (2017). Learning to read French. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Duncan, Lynne G., Castro, São Luís, Defior, Sylvia, Seymour, Philip H. K., Baillie, Sheila, Leybaert, Jacqueline, Mousty, Philippe, Genard, Nathalie, Sarris, Menelaos, Porpodas, Costas D., Lund, Rannveig, Sigurðsson, Baldur, Þráinsdóttir, Anna S., Sucena, Ana, & Serrano, Francisca. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009
    • Khateb, Asaid, Taha, Haitham Y., Elias, Inas, & Ibrahim, Raphiq. (2013). The effect of the internal orthographic connectivity of written Arabic words on the process of the visual recognition: A comparison between skilled and dyslexic readers [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.834244
    • Landerl, Karin. (2019). Behavioral precursors of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.011
    • Lee, Lay Wah, Low, Hui Min, & Mohamed, Abdul Rashid. (2012). Word count analysis of Malay language textbooks for the purpose of developing a Malay reading remedial programme [Special issue: Second language writing systems, edited by Benedetta Bassetti, Jyotsna Vaid, & Vivian Cook]. Writing Systems Research, 4(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.690713
    • Lipka, Orly, Katzir, Tami, & Shaul, Shelley. (2016). The basis of reading fluency in first grade of Hebrew speaking children. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 91–104). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_6
    • Liu, Duo, & Zhu, Xiaoqin. (2016). The associations of phonological awareness, morphological awareness, orthographic awareness and RAN with Hong Kong Chinese children's literacy performance at word level. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218747
    • Llaurado, Anna, & Tolchinsky, Liliana. (2016). The developmental pattern of spelling in Catalan from first to fifth school grade. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.1000812
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Nag, Sonali. (2014a). Akshara-phonology mappings: The common yet uncommon case of the consonant cluster [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855621
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Pennington, Bruce F., & Peterson, Robin L. (2015). Development of dyslexia. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 361–376). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Piper, Benjamin, & van Ginkel, Agatha J. (2017). Reading the script: How the scripts and writing systems of Ethiopian languages relate to letter and word identification. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 36–59, https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1220354
    • Roberts, David. (2014). [Book review: Meikal Mumin & Kees Versteegh (Eds.), (2014), The Arabic script in Africa: Studies in the use of a writing system]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 308–314. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.06rob
    • Sadeghi, Amir, Everatt, John, & McNeill, Brigid. (2016). A simple model of Persian reading. Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.1003768
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2013). A tale of one letter: Morphological processing in early Arabic spelling. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.857586
    • Share, David L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(752). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
    • Share, David L. (2020). Extricating reading science from entrenched anglocentricism, eurocentricism, and alphabetism and embracing global diversity: A personal journey. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 4(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.28987/ijrld.4.2.3
    • Shuai, Lan, Frost, Stephen J., Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Neurocognitive markers of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 277–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.013
    • Stenson, Nancy, & Hickey, Tina M. (2016). When regular is not easy: Cracking the code of Irish orthography. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1177481
    • Taha, Haitham. (2016). Deep and shallow in Arabic orthography: New evidence from reading performance of elementary school native Arab readers. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1114910
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Yamashita, Junko. (2018). Orthographic and phonological processing in L2-English word recognition: Longitudinal observations from Grade 9 to 11 in EFL learners in Japan. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 267–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Ziegler, Johannes C., Perry, Conrad, & Zorzi, Marco. (2019). Modeling the variability of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 350–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.016
  • Ziegler, J. C., Castel, C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., Alario, F. X., & Perry, C. (2008). Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition, 107, 151–178. Cited by6
    • Ahmed, Yusra, Wagner, Richard K., & Kantor, Patricia Thatcher. (2012). How visual word recognition is affected by developmental dyslexia. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 196–215). London: Psychology Press.
    • Barca, Laura, Bello, Arianna, Volterra, Virginia, & Burani, Cristina. (2010). Lexical-semantic reading in a shallow orthography: Evidence from a girl with Williams Syndrome. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9192-8
    • Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in French. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 50–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.003
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Dutch. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 73–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.004
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Perfetti, Charles, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Introduction: Developmental dyslexia – A cross-linguistic perspective. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.001
    • Ziegler, Johannes C., Perry, Conrad, & Zorzi, Marco. (2019). Modeling the variability of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 350–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.016
  • Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5(4), 683–689. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208845 Cited by8
    • Cao, Fan. (2018). Brain mechanisms of Chinese word reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 137–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Duncan, Lynne G., Castro, São Luís, Defior, Sylvia, Seymour, Philip H. K., Baillie, Sheila, Leybaert, Jacqueline, Mousty, Philippe, Genard, Nathalie, Sarris, Menelaos, Porpodas, Costas D., Lund, Rannveig, Sigurðsson, Baldur, Þráinsdóttir, Anna S., Sucena, Ana, & Serrano, Francisca. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Hannagan, Thomas. (2014). What is special about orthographic processing? [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 225–252. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.03gra
    • Kolinsky, Régine. (2015). How learning to read influences language and cognition. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 377–393). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Massaro, Dominic W., & Jesse, Alexandra. (2005). The magic of reading: Too many influences for quick and easy explanations. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 37–61). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Nelson, Jessica R., Balass, Michal, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2005). Differences between written and spoken input in learning new words [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 101–120.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., & Grainger, J. (2000). Visual and phonological codes in letter and word recognition: Evidence from incremental priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A(3), 671–692. Cited by6
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). Sublexical representations and the ‘front end’ of visual word recognition [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000288 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 1–10). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., & Montant, M. (2004). Visual phonology: The effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks. Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 732–741. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195863 Cited by5
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Presutti, Stefano. (2021a). The interdependence between speech and writing. Towards a greater awareness. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 83–101). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-prea
    • Rahbari, Noriyeh, & Sénéchal, Monique. (2009). Lexical and nonlexical processes in the skilled reading and spelling of Persian. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9122-1
    • Thomson, Jennifer M., & Goswami, Usha. (2010). Learning novel phonological representations in developmental dyslexia: Associations with basic auditory processing of rise time and phonological awareness. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9167-9
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ziegler J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 Cited by134
    • Ahlberg, Aija Katriina. (2020). How abugida readers learn alphabetic literacy skills: The role of phonological awareness in the transfer process in the Konso language, Southwest Ethiopia (JYU Dissertations 237). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-8188-4
    • Ahlberg, Aija Katriina, Eklund, Kenneth, Otieno, Suzanne C. S. A., & Nieminen, Lea. (2019). From abugida to alphabet in Konso, Ethiopia: The interplay between script and phonological awareness. Written Language & Literacy, 22(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00018.ahl
    • Ahmed, Yusra, Wagner, Richard K., & Kantor, Patricia Thatcher. (2012). How visual word recognition is affected by developmental dyslexia. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 196–215). London: Psychology Press.
    • Andrews, Sally. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A. (2017). Reading Arabic with the diacritics for short vowels: Vowelised but not necessarily easy to read. Writing Systems Research, 9(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1400493
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., Hutchinson, Keith A., & Cortese, Michael J. (2012). Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 90–115). London: Psychology Press.
    • Barca, Laura, Ellis, Andrew W., & Burani, Cristina. (2007). Context-sensitive rules and word naming in Italian children. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9040-z
    • Bar-Kochva, Irit, Khateb, Asaid, & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2016). Introduction. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 1–7). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_1
    • Bekebrede, Judith, van der Leij, Aryan, & Share, David L. (2009). Dutch dyslexic adolescents: Phonological-core variable-orthographic differences. Reading and Writing, 22(2), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9105-7
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Both-de Vries, Anna C., & Bus, Adriana G. (2010b). The proper name as starting point for basic reading skills. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9158-2
    • Brunswick, Nicola. (2010). Unimpaired reading development and dyslexia across different languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 131–154). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Burani, Cristina, Thornton, Anna M., & and Zoccolotti, Pierluigi. (2017). Learning to read Italian. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 211–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Candan, Ecehan, Babür, Nalan, Haznedar, Belma, & Erçetin , Gülcan. (2020). Reading and spelling skills in transparent orthographies: Phonological encoding and rapid automatized naming in Turkish. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 185–201). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_12
    • Cao, Fan. (2018). Brain mechanisms of Chinese word reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 137–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Caravolas, Markéta, & Samara, Anna. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 326–343). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Chan, David W., Ho, Connie S.-H., Tsang, Suk-Man, Lee, Suk-Han, & Chung, Kevin K. H. (2006). Exploring the reading-writing connection in Chinese children with dyslexia in Hong Kong. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 543–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9008-z
    • Chang, Li-Yun, Chen, Yen-Chi, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2018). GraphCom: A multidimensional measure of graphic complexity applied to 131 written languages. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0881-y
    • Chang, Li-Yun, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2018). Visual factors in writing system variation: Measurement and implications for reading. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 49–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Cho, Jeung-Ryeul, McBride-Chang, Catherine, & Park, Soon-Gil. (2008). Phonological awareness and morphological awareness: Differential associations to regular and irregular word recognition in early Korean Hangul readers. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9072-z
    • Cholewa, Jürgen, Mantey, Stefanie, Heber, Stefanie, & Hollweg, Wibke. (2010). Developmental surface and phonological dysgraphia in German 3rd graders. Reading and Writing, 23(1), 97–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9153-7
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2019). Indic scripts: History, typology, study. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 11–42). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_2
    • Davies, Robert A. I., & Cuetos, Fernando. (2010). Reading acquisition and dyslexia in Spanish. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 155–180). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Duncan, Lynne G. (2010). Phonological development from a cross-linguistic perspective. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 43–68). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Duncan, Lynne G., Castro, São Luís, Defior, Sylvia, Seymour, Philip H. K., Baillie, Sheila, Leybaert, Jacqueline, Mousty, Philippe, Genard, Nathalie, Sarris, Menelaos, Porpodas, Costas D., Lund, Rannveig, Sigurðsson, Baldur, Þráinsdóttir, Anna S., Sucena, Ana, & Serrano, Francisca. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009
    • Everatt, John, Ocampo, Dina, Veii, Kazuvire, Nenopoulou, Styliani, Smythe, Ian, al Mannai, Haya, & Elbeheri, Gad. (2010). Dyslexia in biscriptal readers. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 221–245). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Farran, Lama K., Bingham, Gary E., & Matthews, Mona W. (2014). Environmental contributions to language and literacy outcomes in bilingual English-Arabic children in the U.S. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 351–379). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Fendel, Victoria. (2021). A small step for a man, a giant leap for a aeople—The Coptic language. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 775–786). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-fend
    • Fricke, Silke, Szczerbinski, Marcin, Stackhouse, Joy, & Fox-Boyer, Annette V. (2008). Predicting individual differences in early literacy acquisition in German: The role of speech and language processing skills and letter knowledge [Special issue: The role of phonology in reading, edited by Martina Penke]. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 103–146. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.02fri
    • Frost, Stephen J., Sandak, Rebecca, Mencl, W. Einar, Landi, Nicole, Moore, Dina, Della Porta, Gina, Rueckl, Jay G., Katz, Leonard, & Pugh, Kenneth R. (2008). Neurobiological and behavioral studies of skilled and impaired word reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 355–376). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1308239
    • Goswami, Usha. (2006). Orthography, phonology, and reading development: A cross-linguistics perspective. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 463–480). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2008). Phonological representations for reading acquisition across languages. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 65–84). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2009). The basic processes in reading: Insights from neuroscience. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 134–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2010). A psycholinguistic grain size view of reading acquisition across languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 23–42). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Goswami, Usha, Gerson, Danielle, & Astruc, Luisa. (2010). Amplitude envelope perception, phonology and prosodic sensitivity in children with developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 995–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9186-6
    • Gottardo, Alexandra, Javier, Christine, Farnia, Fataneh, Mak, Lorinda, & Geva, Esther. (2014). Bidirectional cross-linguistic relations of first and second language skills in reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English learners [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 62–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.04got
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Halderman, Laura K., Ashby, Jane, & Perfetti, Charles A. (2012). Phonology: An early and integral role in identifying words. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 207–228). London: Psychology Press.
    • Hu, Chieh-Fang. (2008). Use orthography in L2 auditory word learning: Who benefits? Reading and Writing, 21(8), 823–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9094-6
    • Jasińska, Kaja K., Frost, Stephen, Molfese, Peter, Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, Rueckl, Jay, & Pugh, Ken. (2016). Neuroimaging perspectives on skilled and impaired reading and the bilingual experience. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_3
    • Jeong, Junghye, Katz, Leonard, & Lee, Yang. (2018). The two-dimensional orthography of phonology and morphology in differentiating Korean and Chinese. Writing Systems Research, 10(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2018.1519482
    • Jiménez, Juan E., García de la Cadena, Claudia, Siegel, Linda S., O'Shanahan, Isabel, García, Eduardo, & Rodríguez, Cristina. (2011). Gender ratio and cognitive profiles in dyslexia: A cross-national study. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 729–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9222-6
    • Joshi, R. Malatesha, & McBride, Catherine. (2019). Introduction: Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 3–9). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_1
    • Kalindi, Sylvia Chanda, Chung, Kevin Kien Hoa, Liu, Duo Phil, & Wang, Li-Chih Angus. (2018). The complexities of written Chinese and the cognitive-linguistic precursors to reading, with consequent implications for reading interventions. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 99–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Keenan, Janice M., & Betjemann, Rebecca S. (2008a). Comprehension of single words: The role of semantics in word identification and reading disability. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 191–210). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Kerek, Eugenia, & Niemi, Pekka. (2012). Grain-size units of phonological awareness among Russian first graders. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1), 80–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.05ker
    • Kim, Young-Suk. (2009a). Crosslinguistic influence on phonological awareness for Korean–English bilingual children [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 843–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9132-z
    • Koh, Poh Wee, Chen, Xi, & Gottardo, Alexandra. (2018). How do phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and vocabulary knowledge relate to word reading within and between English and Chinese? In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 73–98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Ktori, Maria, & Pitchford, Nicola J. (2010). Letter position encoding across deep and transparent orthographies. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 69–85). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Lee, Lay Wah, Low, Hui Min, & Mohamed, Abdul Rashid. (2012). Word count analysis of Malay language textbooks for the purpose of developing a Malay reading remedial programme [Special issue: Second language writing systems, edited by Benedetta Bassetti, Jyotsna Vaid, & Vivian Cook]. Writing Systems Research, 4(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.690713
    • Leikin, Mark, Share, David L., & Schwartz, Mila. (2005). Difficulties in L2 Hebrew reading in Russian-speaking second graders. Reading and Writing, 18(59, 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-8919-4
    • Leong, Che Kan, & Ho, Man Koon. (2008). The role of lexical knowledge and related linguistic components in typical and poor language comprehenders of Chinese. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9113-7
    • López-Escribano, Carmen. (2016). Training reading fluency and comprehension of Spanish children with dyslexia. In Asaid Khateb & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 141–158). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_9
    • Manolitsis, George, & Tafa, Eufimia. (2011). Letter-name letter-sound and phonological awareness: Evidence from Greek-speaking kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 24(1), 27–53. doi10.1007/s11145-009-9200-z
    • Marcolini, Stefania, Burani, Cristina, & Colombo, Lucia. (2009). Lexical effects on children's pseudoword reading in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9123-0
    • Marinelli, Chiara Valeria, Angelelli, Paola, Notarnicola, Alessandra, & Luzzatti, Claudio. (2009). Do Italian dyslexic children use the lexical reading route efficiently? An orthographic judgment task. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9118-x
    • McBride, Catherine. (2017). Early literacy across languages. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 55–74). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • McClung, Nicola A., O'Donnell, Colleen R., & Cunningham, Anne E. (2012). Orthographic learning and the development of visual word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 2: Meaning and context, individuals and development (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 173–195). London: Psychology Press.
    • McClung, Nicola A., & Pearson, P. David. (2019). Reading comprehension across languages: Seven European orthographies and two international literacy assessments. Written Language & Literacy, 22(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00019.mcc
    • McDougall, Siné, Brunswick, Nicola, & de Mornay Davies, Paul. (2010). Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies: An introduction and overview. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 3–21). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • McKay, Michael F., & Thompson, G. Brian. (2009). Reading vocabulary influences in phonological recoding during the development of reading skill: A re-examination of theory and practice. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9106-6
    • Meletis, Dimitrios. (2020a). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications 3). Brest: Fluxus Editions.
    • Mirza, Amna, & Gottardo, Alexandra. (2019). Learning to read in their heritage language: Hindi-English speaking children reading two different orthographies. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 329–351). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_17
    • Morfidi, Eleni, van der Leij, Aryan, de Jong, Peter F., Scheltinga, Femke, & Bekebrede, Judith. (2007). Reading in two orthographies: A cross-linguistic study of Dutch average and poor readers who learn English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 20(8), 753–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9035-9
    • Nag, Sonali. (2014b). Alphabetism and the science of reading: From the perspective of the akshara languages [General commentary article]. Frontiers in Psycholology, 5:866. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00866
    • Nation, Kate, & Castles, Anne. (2017). Putting the learning into orthographic learning. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 147–168). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Neijt, Anneke, Peters, Mijntje, & Zuidema, Johan. (2012). The 12321 model of Dutch spelling acquisition. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.29.09nei
    • Nergård-Nilssen, T. (2006). Word-decoding deficits in Norwegian: The impact of psycholinguistic marker effects. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5468-9
    • Nesan, Mimisha, Sadeghi, Amir, & Everatt, John. (2019). Literacy acquisition in the Malayalam orthography: Cognitive/linguistic influences within a multilingual context. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 85–101). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_5
    • Pae, Hye K. (2011). Is Korean a syllabic alphabet or an alphabetic syllabary? Writing Systems Research, 3(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr002
    • Pae, Hye K. (2018b). The Korean writing system, Hangul, and word processing. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 335–352). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Pae, Hye K., Bae, Sungbong, & Yi, Kwangoh. (2019). More than an alphabet: Linguistic features of Korean and their influences on Hangul word recognition [Special issue: Writing systems: Past, present (… and future?), edited by Terry Joyce & Robert Crellin]. Written Language & Literacy, 22(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00027.pae
    • Pae, Hye K., Kim, Sun-A, Mano, Quintino R., & Wang, Min. (2018). Crosslinguistic influences of script format: L1-derived syllabification in reading L2 English among native Korean readers. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 353–372). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Paizi, Despina, Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, & Burani, Cristina. (2010). Lexical reading in Italian developmental dyslexic readers. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 181–198). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Paizi, Despina, Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, & Burani, Cristina. (2011). Lexical stress assignment in Italian developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9236-0
    • Pandey, Krishna Kumar, & Jha, Smita. (2019). Tracing the identity and ascertaining the nature of Brahmi-derived Devanagari script. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 9(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.9.1.59-73
    • Pandey, Pramod. (2014). Akshara-to-sound rules for Hindi [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855622
    • Papadopoulos, Timothy C., Georgiou, George K., & Apostolou, Theodosia. (2020). The role of distal and proximal cognitive processes in literacy skills in Greek. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 171–184). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_11
    • Parrila, Rauno K., & Protopapas, Athanassios. (2017). Dyslexia and word reading problems. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 333–358). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Perfetti, Charles, & Harris, Lindsay. (2017). Learning to read English. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 347–370). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Petersson, Karl Magnus, Ingvar, Martin, & Reis, Alexandra. (2009). Language and literacy from a cognitive neuroscience perspective. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 152–181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Pietras, Izabela, & Łockiewicz, Marta. (2020). The development of reading and spelling in Polish: A semi-transparent orthography. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 203–222). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_13
    • Piper, Benjamin, & van Ginkel, Agatha J. (2017). Reading the script: How the scripts and writing systems of Ethiopian languages relate to letter and word identification. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 36–59, https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1220354
    • Rahbari, Noriyeh, Sénéchal, Monique, & Arab-Moghaddam, Narges. (2007). The role of orthographic and phonological processing skills in the reading and spelling of monolingual Persian children. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9042-x
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2019). EPS mid-career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819829696
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Reddy, Pooja P., & Koda, Keiko. (2013). Orthographic constraints on phonological awareness in biliteracy development. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.748639
    • Rimzhim, Anurag, Katz, Leonard, & Fowler, Carol A. (2014). Brāhmī-derived orthographies are typologically Āksharik but functionally predominantly alphabetic [Special issue: Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Sonali Nag & Charles A. Perfetti]. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855618
    • Russak, Susie, amp; Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2011). Phonological awareness in Hebrew (L1) and English (L2) in normal and disabled readers [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9235-1
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2013). A tale of one letter: Morphological processing in early Arabic spelling. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.857586
    • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Elouty, Arige. (2018). Inflectional and derivational morphological awareness in Arabic-speaking High versus Low EFL literacy students. Written Language & Literacy, 21(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00013.sai
    • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, Esther. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, & Geva, Esther. (2010). Acquiring reading in two languages: An introduction to the special issue [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9208-4
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, & Henkin-Roitfarbm Roni. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, Kogan, Nadya, & Walters, Joel. (2010). Universal and language-specific constraints on phonemic awareness: Evidence from Russian–Hebrew bilingual children. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9204-8
    • Schwartz, Mila, Leikin, Mark, & Share, David L. (2005). Bi-literate bilingualism versus mono-literate bilingualism: A longitudinal study of reading acquisition in Hebrew (L2) among Russian-speaking (L1) children [Special issue: Literacy processes and literacy, edited by Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 179–206.
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Share, David L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(752). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
    • Share, David L. (2020). Extricating reading science from entrenched anglocentricism, eurocentricism, and alphabetism and embracing global diversity: A personal journey. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 4(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.28987/ijrld.4.2.3
    • Share, David L. & Daniels, Peter T. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
    • Shuai, Lan, Frost, Stephen J., Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Neurocognitive markers of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 277–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.013
    • Sibley, Daragh E., & Kello, Christopher T. (2012). Learned orthographic representations facilitates large-scale modeling of word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 28–51). London: Psychology Press.
    • Silvén, Maarit, & Rubinov, Evgenia. (2010). Language and preliteracy skills in bilinguals and monolinguals at preschool age: Effects of exposure to richly inflected speech from birth. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 385–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9206-6
    • Singh, Nandini Chatterjee, & Sumathi, T. A. (2019). The role of phonological processing and oral language in the acquisition of reading skills in Devanagari. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 261–276). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_14
    • Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in French. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 50–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.003
    • Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane, Colé, Pascale, Kipffer-Piquard, Agnès, Pinton, Florence, & Billard, Catherine. (2009). Reliability and prevalence of an atypical development of phonological skills in French-speaking dyslexics [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 811–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9117-y
    • Stenson, Nancy, & Hickey, Tina M. (2016). When regular is not easy: Cracking the code of Irish orthography. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1177481
    • Sucena, Ana, Castro, São Luís, & Seymour, Philip. (2009). Developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth: The case of European Portuguese [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9156-4
    • Surányi, Zsuzsanna, Csépe, Valéria, Richardson, Ulla, Thomson, Jennifer M., Honbolygó, Ferenc, & Goswami, Usha. (2009). Sensitivity to rhythmic parameters in dyslexic children: A comparison of Hungarian and English. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9102-x
    • Taha, Haitham. (2016). Deep and shallow in Arabic orthography: New evidence from reading performance of elementary school native Arab readers. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1114910
    • Taibah, Nadia J., & Haynes, Charles W. (2011). Contributions of phonological processing skills to reading skills in Arabic speaking children [Special issue: Literacy acquisition in Arabic, edited by Abdessatar Mahfoudhi, John Everatt & Gad Elbeheri]. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 1019–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9273-8
    • Thompson, G. Brian, McKay, Michael F., Fletcher-Flinn, Claire M., Connelly, Vincent, Kaa, Richard T., & Ewing, Jason. (2008). Do children who acquire word reading without explicit phonics employ compensatory learning? Issues of phonological recoding, lexical orthography, and fluency. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 505–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9075-9
    • Tong, Xiuli, & McBride-Chang, Catherine. (2010). Chinese-English biscriptal reading: Cognitive component skills across orthographies [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9211-9
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, & Perfetti, Charles. (2017). Introduction: Operating principles in learning to read. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Perfetti, Charles, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Introduction: Developmental dyslexia – A cross-linguistic perspective. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.001
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Reitsma, Pieter, & Siegel, Linda S. (2011). Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9232-4
    • Wagner, Richard K., Piasta, Shayne B., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (2006). Learning to read. In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 1111–1142). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Wang, Hsiao-Lan Sharon, Huss, Martina, Hämäläinen, Jarmo A., & Goswami, Usha. (2012). Basic auditory processing and developmental dyslexia in Chinese. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 509–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9284-5
    • Weiss, Silvana, Grabner, Roland H., Kargl, Reinhard, Purgstaller, Christian, & Fink, Andreas. (2010). Behavioral and neurophysiological effects of morphological awareness training on spelling and reading. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 645–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9177-7
    • Winskel, Heather. (2009). Reading in Thai: The case of misaligned vowels. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9100-z
    • Winskel, Heather, & Iemwanthong, Kanyarat. (2010). Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1021–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9194-6
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Winskel, Heather, & Ratitamkul, Theeraporn. (2019). Learning to read and write in Thai. In R. Malatesha Joshi & Catherine McBride (Eds.), Handbook of literacy in akshara orthography (Literacy Studies 17) (pp. 217–231). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05977-4_12
    • Woore, Robert. (2014). Beginner learners' progress in decoding L2 French: Transfer effects in typologically similar L1-L2 writing systems. Writing Systems Research, 6(2), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.838536
    • Wydell, Taeko N. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Japanese. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 176–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.009
    • Xu, Min, Tan, Li Hai, & Perfetti, Charles. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Chinese. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 200–225). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.010
    • Yamashita, Junko. (2018). Orthographic and phonological processing in L2-English word recognition: Longitudinal observations from Grade 9 to 11 in EFL learners in Japan. In Hye K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7) (pp. 267–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2016). Processing the written word. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 453–469). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Yassin, Rana, Share, David L., & Shalhoub-Awwad, Yasmin. (2020). Learning to spell in Arabic: The impact of script-specific visual-orthographic features. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:2059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02059
    • Yuan, Han, Segers, Eliane, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2020). Factors affecting L2 phonological awareness in Chinese-Dutch preschoolers. Written Language & Literacy, 23(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00035.yua
  • Ziegler J. C., & Goswami, U. (2006). Becoming literate in different languages: Similar problems, different solutions. Developmental Science, 9(5), 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00509.x Cited by19
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Davies, Robert A. I., & Cuetos, Fernando. (2010). Reading acquisition and dyslexia in Spanish. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 155–180). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Fern-Pollak, Liory, & Masterson, Jackie. (2016). Dyslexia and the English writing system. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 223–233). Oxon: Routledge.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2009). The basic processes in reading: Insights from neuroscience. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 134–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2010). A psycholinguistic grain size view of reading acquisition across languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 23–42). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Kerek, Eugenia, & Niemi, Pekka. (2012). Grain-size units of phonological awareness among Russian first graders. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1), 80–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.05ker
    • Kim, Young-Suk. (2009a). Crosslinguistic influence on phonological awareness for Korean–English bilingual children [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 843–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9132-z
    • Koda, Keiko. (2013). Second language reading, scripts, and orthographies. In Carol A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1053
    • Koda, Keiko. (2017). Learning to read Japanese. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 57–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Kurvers, Jeanne. (2015). Emerging literacy in adult second-language learners: A synthesis of research findings in the Netherlands [Special issue: Adolescents and adults who develop literacy for the first time in L2, edited by Martha Young-Scholten]. Writing Systems Research, 7(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.943149
    • Loizidou-Ieridou, Nataly, Masterson, Jackie, & Hanley, J. Richard. (2010). Spelling development in 6–11-year-old Greek-speaking Cypriot children. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(3), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01411.x
    • Marcolini, Stefania, Burani, Cristina, & Colombo, Lucia. (2009). Lexical effects on children's pseudoword reading in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9123-0
    • McClung, Nicola A., & Pearson, P. David. (2019). Reading comprehension across languages: Seven European orthographies and two international literacy assessments. Written Language & Literacy, 22(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00019.mcc
    • Nag, Sonali. (2017b). Learning to read alphasyllabaries. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 75–97). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Ramirez, Gloria, Chen, Xi, Geva, Esther, & Kiefer, Heidi. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9
    • Reddy, Pooja P., & Koda, Keiko. (2013). Orthographic constraints on phonological awareness in biliteracy development. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.748639
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Stenson, Nancy, & Hickey, Tina M. (2016). When regular is not easy: Cracking the code of Irish orthography. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1177481
    • Winskel, Heather, & Iemwanthong, Kanyarat. (2010). Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1021–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9194-6
  • Ziegler, J. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (1995). Phonological information provides early sources of constraint in the processing of letter strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 567–593. Cited by5
    • Berent, Iris, & Van Orden, Guy C. (2000). Homophone dominance modulates the phonemic-masking effect. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 133–167.
    • Berent, Iris, & Van Orden, Guy C. (2003). Do null phonemic masking effects reflect strategic control of phonology? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 349–376.
    • Beyermann, Sandra. (2013). Orthographic cues to word stress in German: Word endings and number of final consonant letters. Written Language & Literacy, 16(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.1.02bey
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
  • Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(4), 504–515. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200539 Cited by25
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Asadi, Ibrahim A., Ibrahim, Raphiq, & Khateb, Asaid. (2017). What contributes to spelling in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1218748
    • Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & de Groot, Annette M. B. (2002). Beyond the rime: Measuring the consistency of monosyllabic and polysyallabic words. In Martin Neef, Anneke Neijt, & Richard Sproat (Eds.), The relation of writing to spoken language (Linguistische Arbeiten, 460) (pp. 49–69). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
    • Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Hellwig, Frauke M., & de Groot, Annette M. B. (2004). Word-initial entropy in five languages: Letter to sound, and sound to letter. [Special issue: From letter to sound, edited by Martin Neef & Beatrice Primus]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(2), 165–184.
    • Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Hellwig, Frauke M., & de Groot, Annette M. B. (2005). Onset entropy matters – Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3001-9
    • Bosman, Anna M. T., de Graaff, Saskia, & Gijsel, Martine A. R. (2006). Double Dutch: The Dutch spelling system and learning to spell in Dutch. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 135–150). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Caravolas, Marketa. (2006). Learning to spell in different languages: How orthographic variables might affect early literacy. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 497–511). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Caravolas, Markéta, & Samara, Anna. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 326–343). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Commissaire, Eva, Pasquarella, Adrian, Chen, Xi, & Deacon, S. Hélène. (2014). The development of orthographic processing skills in children in early French immersion programs [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.02com
    • Deacon, S. Hélène, Desrochers, Alain, & Levesque, Kyle. (2017). Learning to read French. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Eme, Elsa, & Golder, Caroline. (2005). Word-reading and word-spelling styles of French beginners: Do all children learn to read and spell in the same way? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 157–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-6409-8
    • Goswami, Usha. (2006). Orthography, phonology, and reading development: A cross-linguistics perspective. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 463–480). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Jaffré, Jean-Pierre, & Fayol, Michel. (2006). Orthography and literacy in French. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 81–103). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Juul, Holger, & Elbro, Carsten. (2004). The links between grammar and spelling: A cognitive hurdle in deep orthographies? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 915–942.
    • Kandel, Sonia, Solger, Olga, Valdois, Sylivane, & Gros, Céline. (2006). Graphemes as motor units in the acquisition of writing skills. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4321-5
    • Massaro, Dominic W., & Jesse, Alexandra. (2005). The magic of reading: Too many influences for quick and easy explanations. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 37–61). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Perfetti, Charles A., & Liu, Ying. (2005). Orthography to phonology and meaning: Comparisons across and within writing systems [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2344-y
    • Pollo, Tatiana Cury, Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2008). Three perspectives on spelling development. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 175–189). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rahbari, Noriyeh, & Sénéchal, Monique. (2009). Lexical and nonlexical processes in the skilled reading and spelling of Persian. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9122-1
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane, & Béchennec, Danielle. (2004). Variability and invariance in learning alphabetic orthographies: From linguistic description to psycholinguistic processing [Special issue: Process and acquisition of written language, edited by Robert Schreuder & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(1), 9–33.
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Venezky, Richard L. (2004). In search of the perfect orthography [Special issue: From letter to sound, edited by Martin Neef & Beatrice Primus]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(2), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.2.02ven
    • Venezky, Richard L. (2006). Foundations for studying basic processes in reading. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 7359–758). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ziegler, J. C., Montant, M., &Jacobs, A. M. (1997). The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(4), 533–554. Cited by12
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Berent, Iris, & Van Orden, Guy C. (2000). Homophone dominance modulates the phonemic-masking effect. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 133–167.
    • Berent, Iris, & Van Orden, Guy C. (2003). Do null phonemic masking effects reflect strategic control of phonology? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 349–376.
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Fletcher-Flinn, Claire M., Shankweiler, Donald, & Frost, Stephen J. (2004). Coordination of reading and spelling in early literacy development: An examination of the discrepancy hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 617–644.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Holmes, Virginia M., & Babauta, Mariko L. (2005). Single or dual representations for reading and spelling? [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 257–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-8129-5
    • Kessler, Brett, Treiman, Rebecca, & Mullennix, John. (2008). Feedback-consistency effects in single-word reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 159–174). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Massaro, Dominic W., & Jesse, Alexandra. (2005). The magic of reading: Too many influences for quick and easy explanations. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 37–61). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Tan, Li-Tan, & Perfetti, Charles A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343 [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 11–46). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Weekes, Brendan S., Castles, Anne E., & Davis, Robert A. (2006). Effects of consistency and age of acquisition on reading and spelling among developing readers. Reading and Writing, 19(2), 133–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2032-6
  • Ziegler, J. C., Muneaux, M., & Grainger, J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(4), 779–793. Cited by5
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Macizo, Pedro, & Van Petten, Cyma. (2007). Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 295–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9032-z
    • Magnuson, James S. (2008). Nondeterminism, pleiotropy, and single-word reading: Theoretical and practical concerns. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 377–404). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Marian, Viorica. (2017). Orthographic and phonological neighborhood databases across multiple languages [Special issue: Orthographic databases and lexicons, edited by Lynne Cahill & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 20(1), 6–26. doi 10.1075/wll.20.1.02mar
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., Dufau, S., & Grainger, J. (2010). Rapid processing of letters, digits and symbols: what purely visual-attentional deficit in developmental dyslexia? Developmental Science, 13, F8–F14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00983.x Cited by8
    • Bosse, Marie-Line. (2015). Learning to read and spell: How children acquire word orthographic knowledge. Child Development Perspectives, 9(4), 222–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12133
    • Grainger, Jonathan & Dufau, Stéphane. (2012). The front end of visual word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 159–184). London: Psychology Press.
    • Nation, Kate, & Castles, Anne. (2017). Putting the learning into orthographic learning. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 147–168). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Niolaki, Georgia Z., Terzopoulos, Aris R., & Masterson, Jackie. (2014). Varieties of developmental dyslexia in Greek children. Writing Systems Research, 6(2), 230–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.893862
    • Parrila, Rauno K., & Protopapas, Athanassios. (2017). Dyslexia and word reading problems. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 333–358). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in French. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 50–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.003
    • Winskel, Heather, & Padakannaya, Prakash (Eds.). (2014). South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ziegler, Johannes C., Perry, Conrad, & Zorzi, Marco. (2019). Modeling the variability of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 350–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.016
  • Ziegler, J. C., & Perry, C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: Resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition, 68, B53–B62. Cited by5
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Macizo, Pedro, & Van Petten, Cyma. (2007). Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 295–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9032-z
    • Post, Yolanda V., & Carreker, Suzanne. (2002). Orthographic similarity and phonological transparency in spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3/4), 317–340.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., + Coltheart, M. (2000). The DRC model of visual word recognition and reading aloud: An extension to German. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 413–430. Cited by7
    • Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Hellwig, Frauke M., & de Groot, Annette M. B. (2004). Word-initial entropy in five languages: Letter to sound, and sound to letter. [Special issue: From letter to sound, edited by Martin Neef & Beatrice Primus]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(2), 165–184.
    • Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Hellwig, Frauke M., & de Groot, Annette M. B. (2005). Onset entropy matters – Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3001-9
    • Conrad, Markus, & Jacobs, Arthur M. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000224 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 44–64). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Davies, Robert A. I., & Cuetos, Fernando. (2010). Reading acquisition and dyslexia in Spanish. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 155–180). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Manolitsis, George, & Tafa, Eufimia. (2011). Letter-name letter-sound and phonological awareness: Evidence from Greek-speaking kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 24(1), 27–53. doi10.1007/s11145-009-9200-z
    • Presutti, Stefano. (2021b). Graphemic complexity for the new Romance phonemes in Italian. Some reflections. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 755–773). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-preb
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
  • Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Jacobs, A. M., & Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science, 12(5), 379–384. Cited by16
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Bolger, Patrick, Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & Jakab, Emőke. (2009). Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 12(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.1.06bol
    • Coltheart, Max. (2012). Dual-route theories of reading aloud. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 3–27). London: Psychology Press.
    • Conrad, Markus, & Jacobs, Arthur M. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000224 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 44–64). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Davies, Robert A. I., & Cuetos, Fernando. (2010). Reading acquisition and dyslexia in Spanish. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 155–180). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Duncan, Lynne G., Castro, São Luís, Defior, Sylvia, Seymour, Philip H. K., Baillie, Sheila, Leybaert, Jacqueline, Mousty, Philippe, Genard, Nathalie, Sarris, Menelaos, Porpodas, Costas D., Lund, Rannveig, Sigurðsson, Baldur, Þráinsdóttir, Anna S., Sucena, Ana, & Serrano, Francisca. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009
    • Figueredo, L. (2006). Using the known to chart the unknown: A review of first-language influence on the development of English-as-a-second-language spelling skill. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 873–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9014-1
    • Frost, Stephen J., Sandak, Rebecca, Mencl, W. Einar, Landi, Nicole, Moore, Dina, Della Porta, Gina, Rueckl, Jay G., Katz, Leonard, & Pugh, Kenneth R. (2008). Neurobiological and behavioral studies of skilled and impaired word reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 355–376). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Papadopoulos, Timothy C., Georgiou, George K., & Apostolou, Theodosia. (2020). The role of distal and proximal cognitive processes in literacy skills in Greek. In Rui A. Alves, Teresa Limpo & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (Literacy Studies: Perspectives from Cognitive Neurosciences, Linguistics, Psychology and Education 19) (pp. 171–184). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_11
    • Rastle, Kathleen, & Coltheart, Max. (2006). Is there serial processing in the reading system; and are there local representations? In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 3–24). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Rickard Liow, Susan J., & Lee, Lay Choo. (2004). Metalinguistic awareness and semi-syllabic scripts: Children's spelling errors in Malay [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 7–26.
    • Sasaki, Miho. (2005). The effect of L1 reading processes on L2: A crosslinguistic comparison of Italian and Japanese users of English. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (Second Language Acquisition 11) (289–308). Clevedon; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    • Sibley, Daragh E., & Kello, Christopher T. (2012). Learned orthographic representations facilitates large-scale modeling of word recognition. In James S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language) (pp. 28–51). London: Psychology Press.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Winskel, Heather. (2009). Reading in Thai: The case of misaligned vowels. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9100-z
    • Yap, Melvin J., & Rickard Liow, Susan J. (2016). Processing the written word. In Vivian Cook & Des Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the English writing system (pp. 453–469). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Ma-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Language-specific or universal? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 169–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00139-5 Cited by18
    • Aro, Mikko, & Lyytinen, Heikki. (2016). Training reading skills in Finnish: From reading acquisition to fluency and comprehension. In Asaid Khateb & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 125–140). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_8
    • Cholewa, Jürgen, Mantey, Stefanie, Heber, Stefanie, & Hollweg, Wibke. (2010). Developmental surface and phonological dysgraphia in German 3rd graders. Reading and Writing, 23(1), 97–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9153-7
    • Elbro, Carsten, & de Jong, Peter F. (2017). Orthographic learning is verbal learning: The role of spelling pronunciations. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 169–189). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Frost, Stephen J., Sandak, Rebecca, Mencl, W. Einar, Landi, Nicole, Moore, Dina, Della Porta, Gina, Rueckl, Jay G., Katz, Leonard, & Pugh, Kenneth R. (2008). Neurobiological and behavioral studies of skilled and impaired word reading. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 355–376). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Jasińska, Kaja K., Frost, Stephen, Molfese, Peter, Landi, Nicole, Mencl, W. Einar, Rueckl, Jay, & Pugh, Ken. (2016). Neuroimaging perspectives on skilled and impaired reading and the bilingual experience. In Asaid Khateb, & Irit Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency: Current insights from neurocognitive research and intervention studies (Literacy Studies 12) (pp. 25–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30478-6_3
    • Landerl, Karin. (2006). Reading acquisition in different orthographies: Evidence from direct comparisons. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 513–530). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Landerl, Karin. (2019). Behavioral precursors of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.011
    • Nergård-Nilssen, T. (2006). Word-decoding deficits in Norwegian: The impact of psycholinguistic marker effects. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5468-9
    • Orsolini, Margherita, Fanari, Rachele, Cerracchio, Sara, & Famiglietti, Luisa. (2009). Phonological and lexical reading in Italian children with dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 22(8), 933–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9134-x
    • Paizi, Despina, Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, & Burani, Cristina. (2010). Lexical reading in Italian developmental dyslexic readers. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 181–198). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Perfetti, Charles, & Harris, Lindsay. (2017). Learning to read English. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 347–370). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sainz, Javier S. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Spanish. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 151–169). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane, Colé, Pascale, Kipffer-Piquard, Agnès, Pinton, Florence, & Billard, Catherine. (2009). Reliability and prevalence of an atypical development of phonological skills in French-speaking dyslexics [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 811–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9117-y
    • Su, Yi-Fen, & Samuels, S. Jay. (2010). Developmental changes in character-complexity and word-length effects when reading Chinese script. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1085–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9197-3
    • Sucena, Ana, Castro, São Luís, & Seymour, Philip. (2009). Developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth: The case of European Portuguese [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9156-4
    • van Gorp, Karly, Segers, Eliane, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2016). Masked onset priming in lexical decision: Differential effects in adults and beginning readers. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.04van
    • Ziegler, Johannes C., Perry, Conrad, & Zorzi, Marco. (2019). Modeling the variability of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 350–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.016
  • Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20120397. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0397 Cited by9
    • Bosse, Marie-Line. (2015). Learning to read and spell: How children acquire word orthographic knowledge. Child Development Perspectives, 9(4), 222–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12133
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Hannagan, Thomas. (2014). What is special about orthographic processing? [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 225–252. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.03gra
    • Nation, Kate, & Castles, Anne. (2017). Putting the learning into orthographic learning. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 147–168). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2019). EPS mid-career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819829696
    • Share, David L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(752). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
    • Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in French. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 50–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.003
    • Verhoeven, Ludo. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Dutch. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 73–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.004
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, Perfetti, Charles, & Pugh, Kenneth. (2019). Introduction: Developmental dyslexia – A cross-linguistic perspective. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.001
    • Ziegler, Johannes C., Perry, Conrad, & Zorzi, Marco. (2019). Modeling the variability of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 350–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.016
  • Ziegler, Johannes C., Perry, Conrad, & Zorzi, Marco. (2019). Modeling the variability of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 350–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.016
  • Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 29(4), 600–618. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210615 Cited by27
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Bekebrede, Judith, van der Leij, Aryan, & Share, David L. (2009). Dutch dyslexic adolescents: Phonological-core variable-orthographic differences. Reading and Writing, 22(2), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9105-7
    • Borgwaldt, Susanne R., & de Groot, Annette M. B. (2002). Beyond the rime: Measuring the consistency of monosyllabic and polysyallabic words. In Martin Neef, Anneke Neijt, & Richard Sproat (Eds.), The relation of writing to spoken language (Linguistische Arbeiten, 460) (pp. 49–69). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
    • Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Hellwig, Frauke M., & de Groot, Annette M. B. (2004). Word-initial entropy in five languages: Letter to sound, and sound to letter. [Special issue: From letter to sound, edited by Martin Neef & Beatrice Primus]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(2), 165–184.
    • Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Hellwig, Frauke M., & de Groot, Annette M. B. (2005). Onset entropy matters – Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3001-9
    • Commissaire, Eva, Pasquarella, Adrian, Chen, Xi, & Deacon, S. Hélène. (2014). The development of orthographic processing skills in children in early French immersion programs [Special issue: Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual context - recent research trends, edited by Elena Zaretsky & Mila Schwartz]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.02com
    • Conrad, Markus, & Jacobs, Arthur M. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000224 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 44–64). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Dich, Nadya. (2010). Development of sensitivity to phonological context in learning to spell in English: Evidence from Russian ESL speakers. Written Language & Literacy, 13(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.04dic
    • Goswami, Usha. (2006). Orthography, phonology, and reading development: A cross-linguistics perspective. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 463–480). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2009). The basic processes in reading: Insights from neuroscience. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 134–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Goswami, Usha. (2010). A psycholinguistic grain size view of reading acquisition across languages. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 23–42). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Juul, Holger, & Elbro, Carsten. (2004). The links between grammar and spelling: A cognitive hurdle in deep orthographies? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 915–942.
    • Kessler, Brett. (2009). Statistical learning of conditional orthographic correspondences. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp004
    • Macizo, Pedro, & Van Petten, Cyma. (2007). Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 295–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9032-z
    • Massaro, Dominic W., & Jesse, Alexandra. (2005). The magic of reading: Too many influences for quick and easy explanations. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 37–61). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • McDougall, Siné, Brunswick, Nicola, & de Mornay Davies, Paul. (2010). Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies: An introduction and overview. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 3–21). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Rahbari, Noriyeh, & Sénéchal, Monique. (2009). Lexical and nonlexical processes in the skilled reading and spelling of Persian. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9122-1
    • Rahbari, Noriyeh, Sénéchal, Monique, & Arab-Moghaddam, Narges. (2007). The role of orthographic and phonological processing skills in the reading and spelling of monolingual Persian children. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9042-x
    • Rastle, Kathleen. (2019). EPS mid-career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819829696
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane, & Béchennec, Danielle. (2004). Variability and invariance in learning alphabetic orthographies: From linguistic description to psycholinguistic processing [Special issue: Process and acquisition of written language, edited by Robert Schreuder & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(1), 9–33.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Sun-Alperin, M. Kendra, & Wang, Min. (2011). Cross-language transfer of phonological and orthographic processing skills from Spanish L1 to English L2. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9221-7
    • Treiman, Rebecca, & Kessler, Brett. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Weekes, Brendan S., Castles, Anne E., & Davis, Robert A. (2006). Effects of consistency and age of acquisition on reading and spelling among developing readers. Reading and Writing, 19(2), 133–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2032-6
  • Ziegler, J. C., Tan, L. H., Perry, C., & Montant, M. (2000). Phonology matters: The phonological frequency effect in written Chinese. Psychological Science, 11, 234–238. Cited by4
    • Leong, Che Kan, & Cheng, Pui-Wan. (2003). Consistency effects on lexical decision and naming of two-character Chinese words. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(5), 455–474.
    • Leong, Che Kan, & Ho, Man Koon. (2008). The role of lexical knowledge and related linguistic components in typical and poor language comprehenders of Chinese. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9113-7
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Su, I-Fan, Klingebiel, Kathrin, & Weekes, Brendan S. (2010). Dyslexia in Chinese: Implications for connectionist models of reading. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 199–219). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
  • Ziegler, J. C., Van Orden, G. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). Phonology can help or hurt the perception of print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(3), 845–860. Cited by5
    • Berent, Iris, & Van Orden, Guy C. (2000). Homophone dominance modulates the phonemic-masking effect. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(2), 133–167.
    • Berent, Iris, & Van Orden, Guy C. (2003). Do null phonemic masking effects reflect strategic control of phonology? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 349–376.
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Ziegler, Johannes C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (New Directions in Communication Disorders Research: Integrative Approaches) (pp. 129–157). New York; London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Winskel, Heather, & Iemwanthong, Kanyarat. (2010). Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1021–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9194-6
  • Zifcak, M. (1981). Phonological awareness and reading acquisition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 117–126. Cited by4
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Lundquis, Eric. (1992). On the relations between learning to spell and learning to read. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 179–192). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
    • Wagner, Richard K., & Torgesen, Joseph K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192
  • Zikmund, Hans. (1996). Transliteration [Transliteration]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 1591–1604). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. Cited by1
    • Koch, Christian. (2021). Language identity through Cyrillic script. From Romanian to Moldovan by automatic transliteration in the Wikimoldia Project. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 1067–1082). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-koch
  • Zima, P. (1974). Digraphia: The case of Hausa. Linguistics, 124, 57–69. Cited by4
    • Angermeyer, Philipp Sebastian. (2012). Bilingualism meets digraphia: Script alternation and hybridity in Russian-American writing and beyond. In Mark Sebba, Shahrzad Mahootian, & Carla Jonsson (Eds.), Language mixing and code-switching in writing: Approaches to mixed-language written discourse (Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism 2) (pp. 255–272). New York; London: Routledge.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Elti di Rodeano, Sveva. (2019). Digraphia: The story of a sociolinguistic typology. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Graphemics in the 21st century. Brest, June 13-15, 2018. Proceedings (Grapholinguistics and its applications 1) (pp 111–126). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2018-graf-elti
    • Unseth, Peter. (2008). The sociolinguistics of script choice: An introduction [Special issue: The sociolinguistics of script choice, edited by Peter Unseth]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2008.030
  • Zimansky, Paul. (1993). [Book review: Denise Schmandt-Besserat, (1992), Before writing: From counting to cuneiform]. Journal of Field Archaeology, 20(4), 513–517. Cited by8
    • Chrisomalis, Stephen. (2009). The origins and co-evolution of literacy and numeracy. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 59–74). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (1996c). The first civilization. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (Eds.), The world's writing systems (pp. 21–32). New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Daniels, Peter T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    • Englehardt, Joshua (Ed.). (2012). Agency in ancient writing. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
    • Englund, Robert K. (1998). [Book review: Denise Schmandt-Besserat, (1996), How writing came about]. Written Language & Literacy, 1(2), 257–261.
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2004). The first writing: Script invention as history and process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edition). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing. [1985, First edition, Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1987, Reprinted with corrections]
    • Woolf, Greg (2015). Ancient illiteracy? Ancient literacies: Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 58(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.2015.12010.x
  • Zimmermann, Günter. (1956). Die Hieroglyphen der Maya-Handschriften (Abhandlungen aus dem Gebiet der Auslandskunde 62 – Reihe B). Hamburg: Universität Hamburg. Cited by5
    • Boot, Erik. (2010a). Substitution, substitution, substitution: The many faces of Maya writing. In Alex de Voogt & Irving Finkel (Eds.), The idea of writing: Play and complexity (pp. 43–70). Leiden; Boston: Brill.
    • Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1958, German translation with revisions, Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet: Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1963, Second revised edition, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 1973, French translation, Pour une théorie de l'écriture. Paris: Flammarion ]
    • Houston, Stephen D. (Ed.). (2012). The shape of script: How and why writing systems change (School for Advanced Research Advanced Seminar Series). Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
    • Mora-Marín, David. (2016). A study in Mayan paleography: The history of T168/2M1a ʔAJAW ‘Lord, Ruler’ and the origin of the syllabogram T130/2S2 wa. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 35–74. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.02mor
    • Prem, Hanns J., & Riese, Berthold. (1983). Autochthonous American writing systems: The Aztec and Maya examples. In Florian Coulmas & Konrad Ehlich (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 167–186). Berlin; New York; Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.
  • Zinn, Katharina. (2018). Literacy in pharaonic Egypt: Orality and literacy between agency and memory. In Anne Kolb (Ed.), Literacy in ancient everyday life (pp. 67–97). Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Zinna, D. R., Liberman, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1986). Children's sensitivity to factors influencing vowel reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 465–479. Cited by6
    • Bear, Donald R. (1992). The prosody of oral reading and stages of word knowledge. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 137–189). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Elbro, Carsten. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Danish: A deep orthography in cross-linguistic light. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 31–45). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Fletcher-Flinn, Claire M., Shankweiler, Donald, & Frost, Stephen J. (2004). Coordination of reading and spelling in early literacy development: An examination of the discrepancy hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(6), 617–644.
    • McGuinness, Diane. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Paap, Kenneth R., Noel, Ronald W., & Johansen, Linda S. (1992). Dual-route models of print to sound: Red herrings and real horses. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Advances in Psychology 94) (pp. 293–318). Amsterdam; London; New York; Tokyo: North-Holland.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
  • Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cited by10
    • Ellis, Nick C., Miwa, Natsume, Stavropoulou, Katerina, Hoxhallari, Lorenc, Van Daal, Victor H.P., Polyzoe, Nicoletta, Tsipa, Maria-Louisa, & Petalas, Michalis. (2004). The effects of orthographic depth on learning to read alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic scripts. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 438–468. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.4.5
    • Feldman, Laurie Beth, Milin, Petar, Cho, Kit W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, & O'Connor, Patrick A. (2015). Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00111
    • Henderson, Leslie. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London; New York: Academic Press.
    • Myers, James. (2019). The grammar of Chinese characters: Productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthograhic system (Routledge Studies in East Asian Linguistics). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Pae, Hye K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (Literacy Studies 21). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
    • Roberts, David. (2010a). Exploring written ambiguities can help assess where to mark tone. Writing Systems Research, 2(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq003
    • Steenbeek-Planting, Esther G., van Bon, Wim H. J., & Schreuder, Robert. (2017). Instability of word reading errors of typical and poor readers. Written Language & Literacy, 20(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00002.ste
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
    • Unger, J. Marshall. (2011). What linguistic units do Chinese characters represent? Written Language & Literacy, 14(2), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.06ung
    • Watt, William C. (1988a). Canons of alphabetic change. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 122–152). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. New York: Hafner. Cited by9
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Coulmas, Florian. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061063
    • Elti di Rodeano, Sveva. (2021). Scripts in contact: Transmission of the first alphabets. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part I (Grapholinguistics and its applications 4) (pp. 223–239). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-rode
    • Farmer, Steve, Sproat, Richard, & Witzel, Michael. (2004). The collapse of the Indus-script thesis: The myth of a literate Harappan civilization. Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 11(2), 19–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/ejvs.2004.2.620
    • Hegenbarth-Reichardt, Ina, & Altmann, Gabriel. (2008). On the decrease of complexity from hieroglyphs to hieratic symbols. In Gabriel Altmann & Fengxiang Fan (Eds.), Analyses of script: Properties of characters and writing systems (Quantitative Linguistics 63) (pp. 105–114). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    • Jee, Hana, Tamariz, Monica, & Shillcock, Richard. (2021). Quantifying sound-graphic systematicity: Application to multiple phonographic orthographies. In Yannis Haralambous (Ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: /gʁafematik/ June 17–19, 2020. Proceedings, Part II (Grapholinguistics and its applications 5) (pp. 905–925). Brest: Fluxus Editions. https://doi.org/10.36824/2020-graf-jeeh
    • Kemp, Nenagh, & Grace, Abbie. (2017). Txting across time: Undergraduates' use of ‘textese’ in seven consecutive first-year psychology cohorts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1285220
    • Roberts, David. (2010a). Exploring written ambiguities can help assess where to mark tone. Writing Systems Research, 2(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq003
    • Surkyn, Hanne, Vandekerckhove, Reinhild, & Sandra, Dominiek. (2021). The impact of analogical effects and social factors on the spelling of partially homophonous verb forms in informal social media writing. Written Language & Literacy, 24(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00046.sur
  • Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, De Luca, Maria, Di Filippo, Gloria, Judica, Anna, & Martelli, Marialuisa. (2009). Reading development in an orthographically regular language: effects of length, frequency, lexicality and global processing ability. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1053–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9144-8 Cited by2
    • Angelelli, Paola, Marinelli, Chiara Valeria, & Zoccolotti, Pierluigi. (2010). Single or dual orthographic representations for reading and spelling? A study of Italian dyslexic-dysgraphic and normal children. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(4), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2010.543539
    • Burani, Cristina, Thornton, Anna M., & and Zoccolotti, Pierluigi. (2017). Learning to read Italian. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 211–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Gasperini, F., Judica, A., & Spinelli, D. (2005). Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 93, 369–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.10.010 Cited by12
    • Angelelli, Paola, Marinelli, Chiara Valeria, & Zoccolotti, Pierluigi. (2010). Single or dual orthographic representations for reading and spelling? A study of Italian dyslexic-dysgraphic and normal children. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(4), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2010.543539
    • Burani, Cristina, Thornton, Anna M., & and Zoccolotti, Pierluigi. (2017). Learning to read Italian. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 211–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Davies, Robert A. I., & Cuetos, Fernando. (2010). Reading acquisition and dyslexia in Spanish. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 155–180). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Elbro, Carsten, & de Jong, Peter F. (2017). Orthographic learning is verbal learning: The role of spelling pronunciations. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 169–189). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Marinelli, Chiara Valeria, Angelelli, Paola, Notarnicola, Alessandra, & Luzzatti, Claudio. (2009). Do Italian dyslexic children use the lexical reading route efficiently? An orthographic judgment task. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9118-x
    • Paizi, Despina, Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, & Burani, Cristina. (2010). Lexical reading in Italian developmental dyslexic readers. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 181–198). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Paizi, Despina, Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, & Burani, Cristina. (2011). Lexical stress assignment in Italian developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9236-0
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2013). A tale of one letter: Morphological processing in early Arabic spelling. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.857586
    • Su, Yi-Fen, & Samuels, S. Jay. (2010). Developmental changes in character-complexity and word-length effects when reading Chinese script. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1085–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9197-3
    • van Gorp, Karly, Segers, Eliane, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2016). Masked onset priming in lexical decision: Differential effects in adults and beginning readers. Written Language & Literacy, 19(1), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.1.04van
    • Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, De Luca, Maria, Di Filippo, Gloria, Judica, Anna, & Martelli, Marialuisa. (2009). Reading development in an orthographically regular language: effects of length, frequency, lexicality and global processing ability. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1053–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9144-8
  • Zoccolotti, P., de Luca, M., di Pace, E., Judica, A., Orlandi, M., & Spinelli, D. (1999). Markers of developmental surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme-phoneme correspondence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716499002027 Cited by18
    • Angelelli, Paola, Marinelli, Chiara Valeria, & Zoccolotti, Pierluigi. (2010). Single or dual orthographic representations for reading and spelling? A study of Italian dyslexic-dysgraphic and normal children. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(4), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2010.543539
    • Aro, Mikko. (2006). Learning to read: The effect of orthography. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 531–550). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Burani, Cristina, Thornton, Anna M., & and Zoccolotti, Pierluigi. (2017). Learning to read Italian. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 211–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Davies, Robert A. I., & Cuetos, Fernando. (2010). Reading acquisition and dyslexia in Spanish. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 155–180). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Grigorenko, Elena L., Naples, Adam, Chang, Joseph, Romano, Christina, Ngorosho, Damaris, Kungulilo, Selemani, Jukes, Matthew, & Bundy, Donald. (2007). Back to Africa: Tracing dyslexia genes in east Africa [Special issue: Genes, environment, and reading, edited by Richard K. Olson]. Reading and Writing, 20(1/2), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9017-y
    • Gupta, Ashum. (2004). Reading difficulties of Hindi-speaking children with developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts, edited by Jyotsna Vaid & Prakash Padakannaya]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1/2), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000013823.56357.8b
    • Job, Remo, Peressotti, Francesca, & Mulatti, Claudio. (2006). The acquisition of literacy in Italian. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 105–119). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Khamis-Dakwar, Reem, & Makhoul, Baha. (2014). The development of ADAT (Arabic Diglossic Knowledge and Awareness Test): A theoretical and clinical overview. In Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (Literacy Studies 9) (pp. 279–300). Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Landerl, Karin, & Thaler, Verena. (2006). Reading and spelling acquisition and dyslexia in German. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 121–134). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Marinelli, Chiara Valeria, Angelelli, Paola, Notarnicola, Alessandra, & Luzzatti, Claudio. (2009). Do Italian dyslexic children use the lexical reading route efficiently? An orthographic judgment task. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9118-x
    • Niolaki, Georgia Z., Terzopoulos, Aris R., & Masterson, Jackie. (2014). Varieties of developmental dyslexia in Greek children. Writing Systems Research, 6(2), 230–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.893862
    • Paizi, Despina, Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, & Burani, Cristina. (2010). Lexical reading in Italian developmental dyslexic readers. In Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, & Paul de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 181–198). Hove; New York. Psychology Press.
    • Paizi, Despina, Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, & Burani, Cristina. (2011). Lexical stress assignment in Italian developmental dyslexia [Special issue: Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading acquisition, edited by Ludo Verhoeven, Pieter Reitsma & Linda Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9236-0
    • Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. (2013). A tale of one letter: Morphological processing in early Arabic spelling. [Special issue: Processing Semitic scripts: Reading and writing in Arabic and Hebrew, edited by Zohar Eviatar & David L. Share]. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.857586
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Sucena, Ana, Castro, São Luís, & Seymour, Philip. (2009). Developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth: The case of European Portuguese [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9156-4
    • Zevin, Jason D. (2019). Modeling developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 372–390). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.017
    • Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, De Luca, Maria, Di Filippo, Gloria, Judica, Anna, & Martelli, Marialuisa. (2009). Reading development in an orthographically regular language: effects of length, frequency, lexicality and global processing ability. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1053–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9144-8
  • Zola, D. (1984). Redundancy and word perception during reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 277–284. Cited by6
    • Inhoff, Albrecht W., & Rayner, Keith. (1996). Das Blickverhalten beim Lesen [Eye movements during reading]. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung 2. Halbband [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research. Volume 2] (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10:2) (pp. 942–957). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
    • Rayner, Keith. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Rayner, Keith, Schotter, Elizabeth R., Masson, Michael E. J., Potter, Mary C., & Treiman, Rebecca. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. doi10.1177/1529100615623267
    • Schotter, Elizabeth R., & Rayner, Keith. (2015). The work of the eyes during reading. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 44–59). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
  • Zorzi, M. (2000). Serial processing in reading aloud: No challenge for a parallel model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 847–856. Cited by5
    • Andrews, Sally. (2006b). All about words: A lexicalist perspective on reading. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 318–347). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Hellwig, Frauke M., & de Groot, Annette M. B. (2005). Onset entropy matters – Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages [Special issue: Reading and spelling words: General and specific principles, edited by Dominiek Sandra & Anneke Neijt]. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3001-9
    • Massaro, Dominic W., & Jesse, Alexandra. (2005). The magic of reading: Too many influences for quick and easy explanations. In Tom Trabasso, John Sabatini, Dominic W. Massaro, & Robert C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 37–61). Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Rastle, Kathleen, & Coltheart, Max. (2006). Is there serial processing in the reading system; and are there local representations? In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 3–24). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
  • Zorzi, M., Barbiero, C., Facoetti, A. Longciari, I., Carrozzi, M., Montico, M., Bravar, L., George, F., Pech-Georgel, C, & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(28), 11455–11459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205566109 Cited by5
    • Facoetti, Andrea, Franceschini, Sandro, & Gori, Simone. (2019). Role of visual attention in developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 307–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.014
    • Grainger, Jonathan, & Hannagan, Thomas. (2014). What is special about orthographic processing? [Special issue: The architecture of writing systems, edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann & Nanna Fuhrhop]. Written Language & Literacy, 17(2), 225–252. doi 10.1075/wll.17.2.03gra
    • Pennington, Bruce F., & Peterson, Robin L. (2015). Development of dyslexia. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 361–376). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Slattery, Timothy J. (2016). Eye movements: From psycholinguistics to font design. In Mary C. Dyson & Ching Y. Suen (Eds.), Digital fonts and reading Series on Computer Processing of Languages 1) (pp. 54–78). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
    • Ziegler, Johannes C., Perry, Conrad, & Zorzi, Marco. (2019). Modeling the variability of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 350–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.016
  • Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(4), 1131–1161. Cited by18
    • Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., & Cortese, Michael J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In Matthew J. Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (Second edition) (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
    • Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). Sublexical representations and the ‘front end’ of visual word recognition [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000288 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 1–10). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Conrad, Markus, & Jacobs, Arthur M. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000224 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 44–64). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Davis, Colin J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
    • Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: Viking.
    • Kessler, Brett. (2009). Statistical learning of conditional orthographic correspondences. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp004
    • Rastle, Kathleen, & Coltheart, Max. (2006). Is there serial processing in the reading system; and are there local representations? In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 3–24). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Schoonbaert, Sofie, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters [Special issue: Sublexical representations in visual word recognition, edited by Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000198 [Republished in Carreiras, Manuel, & Grainger, Jonathan. (Eds.). (2004). Sublexical representations in visual word recognition: A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 12–42). Hove: Psychological Press]
    • Seidenberg, Mark S. (2007). Connectionist models of reading. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 235–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Share, David L. (2008a). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Sucena, Ana, Castro, São Luís, & Seymour, Philip. (2009). Developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth: The case of European Portuguese [Special issue: Reading and dyslexia in different languages, edited by Linda S. Siegel]. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9156-4
    • Tiwari, Shivani, Nair, Remya, & Krishnan, Gopee. (2011). A preliminary investigation of akshara knowledge in the Malayalam alphasyllabary: Extension of Nag's (2007) study. Writing Systems Research, 3(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr013
    • Weekes, Brendan S., Castles, Anne E., & Davis, Robert A. (2006). Effects of consistency and age of acquisition on reading and spelling among developing readers. Reading and Writing, 19(2), 133–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2032-6
    • Will, Udo, Nottbusch, Guido, & Weingarten, Rüdiger. (2006). Linguistic units in word typing: Effects of word presentation modes and typing delay [Special issue: Script adjustment and phonological awareness, edited by Martin Neef & Guido Nottbusch]. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.10wil
    • Wydell, Taeko Nakayama. (1998). What matters in kanji word naming: Consistency, regularity, or On/Kun-reading difference? [Special issue: Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages, edited by Che Lan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3/5), 359–373. [Also published in Che Kan Leong & Katsuo Tamaoka (Eds.), Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages (pp. 205–219). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers]
    • Ziegler, Johannes C., Perry, Conrad, & Zorzi, Marco. (2019). Modeling the variability of developmental dyslexia. In Ludo Verhoeven, Charles Perfetti, & Kenneth Pugh (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 350–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.016
  • Zuidema, Johan, & Neijt, Anneke. (2017). The BasisSpellingBank: A spelling database with knowledge stored as a lexicon of triplets [Special issue: Orthographic databases and lexicons, edited by Lynne Cahill & Terry Joyce]. Written Language & Literacy, 20(1), 52–79. doi 10.1075/wll.20.1.04zui Cited by1
    • Beeksma, Merijn, Neijt, Anneke, & Zuidema, Johan. (2016). SHOTGUN: Converting words into triplets: A hybrid approach to grapheme-phoneme conversion in Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 19(2), 157–188. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.2.02bee
  • Zurif, E. B., & Carson, G. (1970). Dyslexia in relation to cerebral dominance and temporal analysis. Neuropsychologia, 8(3), 351–361. Cited by7
    • Breznitz, Zvia. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Breznitz, Zvia, & Share, David. (2002). Introduction on timing and phonology [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 1–3.
    • Chiappe, Penny, Stringer, Ron, Siegel, Linda S., & Stanovich, Keith E. (2002). Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults [Special issue: Timing and phonology, edited by Zvia Breznitz & David Share]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(1/2), 73–107.
    • Jurdant, Baudouin. (1988). The role of vowels in alphabetic writing. In Derrick de Kerckhove & Charles J. Lumsden (Eds.), The alphabet and the brain: The lateralization of writing (pp. 381–400). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
    • Shankweiler, Donald, & Liberman, Isabelle Y. (1972). Misreading: A search for causes. In James F. Kavanagh & Ignatius G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 293–317). Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
    • Taylor, Insup, & Taylor, M. Martin. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York; London: Academic Press.
  • Zutell, J. (1975). Spelling strategies of primary school children and their relationships to the Piagetian concept of decentration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville. Cited by3
    • Abouzeid, Mary P. (1992). Stages of word knowledge in reading disabled children. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 279–306). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Gill, J. Thomas. (1992). The relationship between word recognition and spelling. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 79–104). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Invemizzi, Marcia A. (1992). The vowel and what follows: A phonological frame of orthographic analysis. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 105–136). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Zutell, J. (1979). Spelling strategies of primary school children and their relationship to Piaget's concept of decentration. Research in the Teaching of English, 13(1), 69–80. Cited by3
    • Henderson, Edmund H. (1992). The interface of lexical competence and knowledge of written words. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 1–30). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Schlagal, Robert C. (1992). Patterns of orthographic development into the intermediate grades. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 31–52). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Zutell, Jerry. (1992). An integrated view of word knowledge: Correlational studies of the relationships among spelling, reading, and conceptual development. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 213–230). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Zutell, J. (1980). Children's spelling strategies and their cognitive development. In E. Henderson & J. Beers (Eds.), Developmental and cognitive aspects of learning to spell: A reflection of word knowledge (pp. 52–73). Newark DE: International Reading Association. Cited by4
    • Beers, Carol S., & Beers, James W. (1992). Children's spelling of English inflectional morphology. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 231–251). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Juul, Holger, & Elbro, Carsten. (2004). The links between grammar and spelling: A cognitive hurdle in deep orthographies? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 915–942.
    • Kemp, Nenagh. (2006). Children's spelling of base, inflected, and derived words: Links with morphological awareness [Special issue: Morphology in word identification, edited by Ludo Verhoeven & Joanne F. Carlisle]. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 737–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9001-6
    • Luelsdorff, Philip A., & Chesnokov, Sergei V. (1994). Determinacy analysis and constrastive orthography. In W. C. Watt (Ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics (Neuropsychology and Cognition 6) (pp. 183–213). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Zutell, Jerry. (1992). An integrated view of word knowledge: Correlational studies of the relationships among spelling, reading, and conceptual development. In Shane Templeton & Donald R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 213–230). Hillsdale, NJ; Hove; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cited by2
    • Kroese, Judith M., Hynd, George W., Knight, Deborah F., Hiemenz, Jennifer R., & Hall, Josh. (2000). Clinical appraisal of spelling ability and its relationship to phonemic awareness (blending, segmenting, elision, and reversal), phonological memory, and reading in reading disabled, ADHD, and normal children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1/2), 105–131.
    • Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
  • Zutell, J., & Allen, V. (1988). The English spelling strategies of Spanish-speaking bilingual children. TESOL Quarterly, 22(2), 333–340. Cited by5
    • Allaith, Zainab A., & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2011). Spelling performance of English consonants among students whose first language is Arabic [Special issue: Literacy acquisition in Arabic, edited by Abdessatar Mahfoudhi, John Everatt & Gad Elbeheri]. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 1089–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9294-3
    • Figueredo, L. (2006). Using the known to chart the unknown: A review of first-language influence on the development of English-as-a-second-language spelling skill. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 873–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9014-1
    • Leikin, Mark, Schwartz, Mila, & Share, David L. (2010). General and specific benefits of bi-literate bilingualism: A Russian–Hebrew study of beginning literacy [Special issue: Acquiring reading in two languages, edited by Elinor Saiegh-Haddad & Esther Geva]. Reading and Writing, 23(3/4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9210-x
    • Raynolds, Laura B., & Uhry, Joanna K. (2010). The invented spellings of non-Spanish phonemes by Spanish–English bilingual and English monolingual kindergarteners. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9169-7
    • Rolla San Francisco, Andrea, Mo, Elaine, Carlo, María, August, Diane, & Snow, Catherine. (2006). The influences of language of literacy instruction and vocabulary on the spelling of Spanish–English bilinguals. Reading and Writing, 19(6), 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9012-3
  • Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162 Cited by13
    • Cain, Kate, & Barnes, Marcia A. (2017). Reading comprehension: What develops and when? In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 257–281). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Caracciolo, Marco. (2014). Punctuating minds: Non-verbal cues for consciousness representation in literary narrative. Journal of Literary Semantics, 43(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/jls-2014-0003
    • Corrigan, Roberta. (2011). Effects of pre-service teachers' receptive vocabulary knowledge on their interactive read-alouds with elementary school students. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 749–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9223-5
    • Fesel, Sabine S., Segers, Eliane, de Leeuw, Linda, & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2016). Strategy training and mind-mapping facilitates children's hypertext comprehension. Written Language & Literacy, 19(2), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.19.2.01fes
    • Kaplan, Dafna. (2013). Development of reading comprehension from middle childhood to adolescence: Distributional and qualitative analyses of two genres. Written Language & Literacy, 16(2), 208–240. https://doi.org/10.1075/wlL16.2.04kap
    • O'Brien, Edward J., & Cook, Anne E. (2015). Models of discourse comprehension. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 217–231). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Parodi, Giovanni. (2007). Reading-writing connections: Discourse-oriented research. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9029-7
    • Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Ashby, Jane, & Clifton, Charles Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (Second edition). New York; Hove: Pyschological Press. [1989, First edition, Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall]
    • Rayner, Keith, Schotter, Elizabeth R., Masson, Michael E. J., Potter, Mary C., & Treiman, Rebecca. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. doi10.1177/1529100615623267
    • Roschke, Kristy, & Radach, Ralph. (2016). Perception, reading, and digital media. In Carol McDonald Connor (Ed.), The cognitive development of reading and reading comprehension (pp. 33–52). London; New York: Routledge.
    • Snowling, Margaret J., & Hulme, Charles (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook (Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Stafura, Joseph Z., & Perfetti, Charles A. (2017). Integrating word processing with text comprehension: Theoretical frameworks and empirical examples. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton, & Rauno K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15) (pp 9–31). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Verhoeven, Ludo, & Perfetti, Charles. (2017). Introduction: Operating principles in learning to read. In Ludo Verhoeven & Charles Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 341–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402123 Cited by8
    • Beyersmann, Elisabeth, Kezilas, Yvette, Coltheart, Max, Castles, Anne, Ziegler, Johannes C., Taft, Marcus, & Grainger, Jonathan. (2018). Taking the book from the bookshelf: Masked constituent priming effects from compound words and nonwords. Journal of Cognition, 1(1): 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.11
    • Dronjic, Vedran. (2011). Mandarin Chinese compounds, their representation, and processing in the visual modality [Special issue: Linguistic and cognitive factors in reading Chinese, edited by Xi Chen & Yang C. Luo]. Writing Systems Research, 3(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr005
    • Liu, Ying, & Peng, Dan-ling. (1997). Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course. In Hsuan-Chih Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 219–232). Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    • Pollatsek, Alexander, & Hyönä, Jukka. (2006). Processing of morphemically complex words in context: What can be learned from eye movements. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 275–298). Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
    • Sahel, Said, Nottbusch, Guido, Grimm, Angela, & Weingarten, Rüdiger. (2008). Written production of German compounds: Effects of lexical frequency and semantic transparency. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.11.2.06sah
    • Sandra, Dominiek, Frisson, Steven, & Daems, Frans. (2004). Still errors after all those years ...: Limited attentional resources and homophone frequency account for spelling errors on silent verb suffixes in Dutch [Special issue: Process and acquisition of written language, edited by Robert Schreuder & Ludo Verhoeven]. Written Language & Literacy, 7(1), 61–77.
    • Wang, Min, Lin, Candise Y., & Gao, Wei. (2010). Bilingual compound processing: The effects of constituent frequency and semantic transparency. Writing Systems Research, 2(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsq012
    • Zhou, Xiaolin, & Marslen-Wilson, William. (1999b). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837.
Compiled and edited by Terry Joyce. © April, 2022